DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis on the Impact of Madrid Protocol for the Economies of Developing Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis on the Impact of Madrid Protocol for the Economies of Developing Countries WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) ANALYSIS ON THE IMPACT OF MADRID PROTOCOL FOR THE ECONOMIES OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES Researcher: Chaudhry Asfand Ali Assistant Director IPO-Pakistan Supervisor: Prof. Yoshitoshi Tanaka Tokyo Institute of Technology Tokyo, Japan Coordinators: Japan Patent Office & Asia-Pacific Industrial Property Centre, Japan Institute of Invention and Innovation Tokyo, September 2008 1 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) ABSTRACT The study is based on the Impact of Madrid Protocol for the Economies of Developing Countries. In this aspect, different parameters are studied which can play an important role for Developing Nations before acceding to Madrid Protocol. These parameters includes the Amendments in the Trade Marks legislation, Awareness and Support Measures for facilitation of the user of the system, Fees for the International Registration of a Mark through Madrid Protocol, Strategy of the Japanese Companies with emphasis on Small and Medium Enterprises to utilize the Madrid Protocol and the Operating System of Japan Patent Office (JPO) for handling the International Applications filed via Madrid Protocol both as an “Office of Origin” and as a “Designated Contracting Party”. Tokyo, September 2008 2 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) TABLE OF CONTENTS S. No. NAME OF THE CHAPTERS Page No. INTRODUCTION 06-07 1.1 Background of the Research Theme; 06 1.2 Objectives of the Research Theme; and 06-07 1.3 Methodology of the Research Theme. 07 OVERVIEW OF THE MADRID PROTOCOL 08-34 2.1 What is Madrid Protocol; 08-10 2.2 Difference in procedure between Paris Convention 10-12 and Madrid Protocol for International Registration of Marks; 2.3 Essentials of Madrid Protocol; 12 2.3.1 Eligible Applicant; 13 2.3.2 Requirements of Marks for International 13 Registration; 2.3.3 Forms for Procedures; 13 2.3.4 Acceptable Language; 14 2.3.5 Points to be noted in using the Protocol; 14 2.3.5.1 Designating United States; 14 2.3.5.2 Designating European Community; 14-15 2.3.5.3 Designating Ireland, Singapore or the United 15 Kingdom; 2.3.5.4 Central Attack; and 15-16 2.3.5.5 Safeguard Clause. 16-17 2.3.6 Fees for International Registration; 17-19 2.3.7 Responsibilities of the Office of Origin; 19-21 2.3.8 Responsibilities of the International Bureau; 21-22 2.3.9 Responsibilities of the Designated Contracting 22-24 Parties; 2.3.10 Effects of International Registration; 24-25 2.3.11 Post Registration Procedures. 25 2.3.11.1 Renewal of Registration; 25-26 2.3.11.2 Subsequent Designation; 26-28 Tokyo, September 2008 3 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) 2.3.11.3 Assignment; 28-29 2.3.11.4 Limitation, Renunciation or Cancellation; 29-30 2.3.11.5 Amendment; 30 2.3.11.6 Licenses; and 30 2.3.11.7 Change of Name or Address of the Right Holder or 30-31 its Representative. 2.4 Pros and Cons of the Madrid Protocol. 31-34 IMPLEMENTATION OF METHODOLOGY 35-121 3.1 Comparison of the Common Provisions of the 35-57 Madrid Protocol in the National Trade Marks Legislations of Japan, Singapore and United States of America and the Conflicts between the National Trade Marks Legislation of Pakistan and Madrid Protocol; 3.2 Study of the Public Awareness Strategy and 57-73 Support for Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan; 3.3 Comparison of the Fees of National registration of 74-77 a Mark in Pakistan with the Fees of International Registration of a Mark via Madrid Protocol; 3.4 Distribution of Questionnaire to the Japanese 77-95 Companies particularly small and medium enterprises and Interviews of Trademark Attorneys practicing Madrid Protocol in Japan; and 3.5 Distribution of questionnaire to the Japan Patent 95-121 Office and Interview of the Officials of JPO. CONSIDERATION OF THE RESULTS 122-146 4.1 Consequence of the comparison of common 122-123 provisions of the Madrid Protocol in the National Trade Marks Legislations of Japan, Singapore and United States of America and Conflicts between the National Trade Marks Legislation of Pakistan and Madrid Protocol; 4.2 Effect of the Awareness Strategy and Support for 123-125 SMEs in Japan; 4.3 Outcome of the Comparison of Fees; 125-126 4.4 Upshot of the Questionnaires to Japanese 126-141 Companies and Interviews of Trademark Tokyo, September 2008 4 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) Attorneys; and 4.5 Corollary of the Questionnaire to Japan Patent 141-146 Office and Interview of the Officials of JPO. RECOMMENDATIONS 147-150 5.1 First Hypothesis; 147 5.2 Second Hypothesis; 147-148 5.3 Third Hypothesis; 148 5.4 Fourth Hypothesis; and 148-149 5.5 Fifth Hypothesis. 149-150 ANNEXES Annex-I Chapter VIIBIS of the Trademark Law of Japan. 151-169 Annex-II Part VII of the Trademarks Act 1998 of Singapore. 170-171 Annex-III Sub Chapter-IV of Chapter-22 of Title 15 of the 172-187 United States Code. Annex-IV Questionnaire for the Japanese Companies 188-193 particularly SMEs. Annex-V Interview Questions for Trade Mark Attorneys of 194-196 Japan. Annex-VI Questionnaire for the Japan Patent Office. 197-199 Annex-VII Follow-Up Questionnaire for the Japan Patent 200-202 Office. REFERENCES 203-204 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 205 Tokyo, September 2008 5 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Research Theme; Madrid Protocol is an effective international procedural mechanism for the registration of Marks around the globe but there are a number of things concerning this protocol that are of great concern for the developing nations. The objectives of my research theme are based on the following background information: The current legislation is required to be amended before acceding to the Madrid Protocol in order to prevent implications after the accession to the treaty; Most of the industries in Pakistan consist of Small and Medium Enterprises that are not well aware of the importance of registration of trademarks at national and international levels; The SME sector of developing countries is financially not so strong to afford the fees for the international registration of marks via Madrid Protocol; The economy of Japan is mainly based on Small and Medium Enterprises; and The staff requirements, capacity building of the staff, workload analysis and automation requirements are also the key factors before accession to the Madrid Protocol. 1.2 Objectives of the Research Theme; The objective of my research theme is to study the impact of Madrid Protocol for the economies of developing countries in terms of the following hypotheses based on the aforesaid information: 1.2.1 Current Trade Marks Law have to be amended in line with the Madrid Protocol; Tokyo, September 2008 6 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) 1.2.2 Capacity building of the SME sector of Pakistan to understand the importance of registration of marks through public awareness campaigns; 1.2.3 Financial support to the SME sector for the international registration of marks via Madrid Protocol; 1.2.4 Strategy by the Japanese companies especially the small and medium enterprises to draw maximum benefit from the Madrid Protocol; and 1.2.5 Study of the operating system of Japan for handling applications filed through Madrid Protocol. 1.3 Methodology of the Research Theme; The following methodology will be adopted in order to accomplish the above mentioned objectives of the research: 1.3.1 Comparison of the Common Provisions of the Madrid Protocol in the National Trade Marks Legislations of Japan, Singapore and United States of America and the Conflicts between the National Trade Marks Legislation of Pakistan and Madrid Protocol; 1.3.2 Study of the public awareness strategy and support for Small and Medium Enterprises in Japan; 1.3.3 Comparison of the fees of national registration of a mark in Pakistan with the fees of international registration of a mark via Madrid Protocol; 1.3.4 Distribution of questionnaire to the Japanese companies particularly small and medium enterprises and interviews of Trademark Attorneys practicing Madrid Protocol in Japan; 1.3.5 Distribution of questionnaire to the Japan Patent Office and Interview of the Officials of JPO; and 1.3.6 Recommendations. Tokyo, September 2008 7 WIPO Six Months Study-cum-Research Fellowship (April – September, 2008) OVERVIEW OF THE MADRID PROTOCOL 2.1 What is Madrid Protocol; The Madrid Protocol is a part of the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks. Madrid System is composed of two separate treaties namely Madrid Agreement concerning the International Registration of Marks of April 14, 1891 and revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Nice on June 15, 1957 and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967 and as amended on September 28, 19791 and Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the International Registration of Marks adopted at Madrid on June 27, 1989, entered into force on December 1, 1995, came into operation on April 1, 1996 and amended on October 3, 20062. Due to the lengthy names, the former usually referred as the Madrid Agreement or sometimes only Agreement and the latter usually referred as the Madrid Protocol or sometimes only Protocol. The Madrid System is administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), a specialized agency of the United Nations3 for developing a balanced and accessible International Intellectual Property System.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts Between Trademarks and Geographical Indications
    University of Arkansas ∙ System Division of Agriculture [email protected] ∙ (479) 575-7646 An Agricultural Law Research Article Quibbling Siblings: Conflicts between Trademarks and Geographical Indications by Dev Gangjee Originally published in CHICAGO-KENT LAW REVIEW 82 CHI.-KENT L. REV. 1253 (2007) www.NationalAgLawCenter.org QUIBBLING SIBLINGS: CONFLICTS BETWEEN TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICAnONS DEY GANGJEE* INTRODUCTION The relationship between trademarks and geographical indications ("GIs") has historically been tempestuous. Each of these quibbling siblings, members of the broader family of unfair competition law, entitles regis­ trants to the exclusive use of a sign. So what happens when a GI collective and a trademark proprietor lay claim to the same sign within a single juris­ diction? In the spirit of this conference-accommodating and reconciling differences between national laws-this paper explores a newly emerging space, which just may be big enough for the both of them. The analysis is prompted by a recent World Trade Organization ("WTO") Panel Reportl which identifies the legal foundations for cohabitation. The Report coin­ cides with doctrinal developments at the national and regional level which initially identified this zone of compromise: the geographical "descriptive use" defense in trademark law. Coexistence is significant as it alters the dynamic of a venerable conflict between trademark and GI regimes, which has been locked in the language of trumps for several decades. Accord­ ingly, this paper introduces the players and describes the game of one­ upmanship prior to this development in Part I; outlines the WTO decision in Part II; and then draws parallels with doctrinal developments in the EU and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • World Trade Organization Organisation Mondiale Du
    WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DU COMMERCE IP/N/1/LCA/T/2 1 September 2004 ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DEL COMERCIO (04-3623) Council for Trade-Related Aspects Original: English/ of Intellectual Property Rights anglais/ inglés MAIN DEDICATED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AND REGULATIONS NOTIFIED UNDER ARTICLE 63.2 OF THE AGREEMENT SAINT LUCIA The present document reproduces the text1 of the Trademarks Regulations Statutory Instrument Nº 17 of 2003, as notified by Saint Lucia under Article 63.2 of the Agreement (see document IP/N/1/LCA/2). Conseil des aspects des droits de propriété intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce PRINCIPALES LOIS ET RÉGLEMENTATIONS CONSACRÉES À LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE NOTIFIÉES AU TITRE DE L'ARTICLE 63:2 DE L'ACCORD SAINTE-LUCIE Le présent document contient le texte1 du Règlement sur les marques de fabrique ou de commerce - Texte réglementaire n° 17 de 2003, notifié par Sainte-Lucie au titre de l'article 63:2 de l'Accord (voir le document IP/N/1/LCA/2). Consejo de los Aspectos de los Derechos de Propiedad Intelectual relacionados con el Comercio PRINCIPALES LEYES Y REGLAMENTOS DEDICADOS A LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL NOTIFICADOS EN VIRTUD DEL PÁRRAFO 2 DEL ARTÍCULO 63 DEL ACUERDO SANTA LUCÍA En el presente documento se reproduce el texto1 del Reglamento de Marcas de Fábrica o de Comercio - Instrumento Nº 17 de 2003, que Santa Lucía ha notificado en virtud del párrafo 2 del artículo 63 del Acuerdo (véase el documento IP/N/1/LCA/2). 1 In English only./En anglais seulement./En inglés solamente. IP/N/1/LCA/T/2 Page 2 Trade Marks Regulations SAINT LUCIA ———— No.
    [Show full text]
  • Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications
    E SCT/40/5 PROV. ORIGINAL: ENGLISH DATE: OCTOBER 12, 2018 Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications Fortieth Session Geneva, November 12 to 16, 2018 COMPILATION OF THE REPLIES TO QUESTIONNAIRE I ON THE NATIONAL AND REGIONAL SYSTEMS THAT CAN PROVIDE A CERTAIN PROTECTION TO GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Document prepared by the Secretariat INTRODUCTION 1. At the thirty-ninth session of the Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT), held in Geneva from April 23 to 26, 2018, the SCT requested the Secretariat to issue to members and Intergovernmental Intellectual Property Organizations with observer status, a Questionnaire on the national and regional systems that can provide a certain protection to geographical indications, in the agreed format (document SCT/39/10, paragraph 21). 2. Accordingly, the Secretariat prepared and addressed to all members of the SCT and Intergovernmental Intellectual Property Organizations with observer status, under Circular letter C. 8771 of June 11, 2018, Questionnaire I on the national and regional systems that can provide a certain protection to geographical indications (hereinafter “Questionnaire I”). In addition, an online version of Questionnaire I was also made available, in English, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish at: http://survey.mbeem.com/Geographical-Indication-surveys. SCT/40/5 Prov. page 2 3. At the closing date to return the completed questionnaire to WIPO (i.e., on September 10, 2018), replies from the following SCT members had been received: Australia, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, France, Georgia, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Iceland, Israel, Jamaica, Japan, Kazakhstan, Lithuania, Madagascar, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States of America, Uruguay, Viet Nam and the European Union (38).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft of the Trade Mark Law
    1 DRAFT OF THE TRADE MARK LAW Part One GENERAL PROVISIONS The Concept of a Trade Mark Article 1 (1) A trade or a service mark (hereinafter: a trade mark) shall protect a sign which may be represented graphically and which is capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking, from the identical or similar goods or services of other undertakings. (2) Trade marks may protect, in particular: words, letters, numerals, abbreviations, graphical representations, combinations of colours and the tints thereof, three- dimensional forms, shapes of the goods or of their packaging, provided that they are distinctive, as well as the combinations of all above indicated signs. (3) A seal, a stamp and a hallmark (official mark identifying precious metals, measures, etc.) shall not be considered marks under this Law. Distinctiveness Article 2 (1) A sign shall be capable of distinguishing if it gives to certain goods or services, comparing them with the identical or similar ones, a special, distinctive character. (2) In judging whether a sign is capable of distinguishing goods or services in the course of trade, all circumstances, particularly the time and scope of its previous use in the Republic of Croatia, shall be taken into consideration. Field of Application Article 3 This Law shall apply to individual, collective and certification marks which are registered or applied for before the State Intellectual Property Office (hereinafter: the Office) or which are internationally registered with the effect for the Republic of Croatia. National Status Article 4 (1) Foreign natural or legal persons shall enjoy, under this Law, the same rights as are enjoyed by the nationals of the Republic of Croatia or legal entities having their seat 2 in the Republic of Croatia, if it results from international treaties or conventions or from the application of the principle of reciprocity.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Rights Management in the Digital Single Market
    Implementation of the EU Trade Mark Directive 2015 Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Implementation of the EU Trade Mark Directive 2015 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Relevance of UK withdrawal from the EU ......................................................... 1 Our approach to implementation ...................................................................... 2 About this consultation ............................................................................................ 2 Proposed amendments in detail ............................................................................. 3 Article 3: Signs of which a trade mark may consist .......................................... 3 Article 3: Removal of requirement for ‘graphic representation’ in section 1 - new file formats ................................................................. 3 Article 3 (and Article 39.2): ‘Competent authorities’ ............................... 4 Article 4: Absolute grounds for refusal ............................................................ 5 Article 4.1(i),(j),(k) & (l) – specific references to geographical indications, traditional terms for wine, etc .............................................. 5 Article 4.5: distinctive character acquired after application date, but before registration date (optional) ............................................ 6 Article 5: Relative Grounds for refusal or invalidity ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Trade Marks: an Overview
    2013] F-1 Collective Trade Marks: An Overview Prachi Gupta* Collective marks are usually defined as signs which distinguish the geographical origin, material, mode of manufacture or other common characteristics of goods or services of different enterprises using the collective mark. The owner may be either an association of such enterprises who are members or any other entity. In other words, a collective Trade Mark or collective mark is a Trade Mark owned by an organization or an association), used by its members to identify themselves with a level of quality or accuracy, geographical origin, or other characteristics set by the organization. This article discusses collective Trade Marks vis-a- vis competition law and how there is a need to create a fine balance between the both. Under the Intellectual Property Law of that the trader belongs to the association most countries, there are provisions on who own the collective Trade Mark. the protection of collective marks. Collective marks are often used to Collective marks are usually defined as promote products which are signs which distinguish the characteristic of a given region. In such geographical origin, material, mode of cases, the creation of a collective mark manufacture or other common not only helps to market such products characteristics of goods or services of domestically and occasionally different enterprises using the collective internationally, but also provides a mark. The owner may be either an framework for cooperation between local association of such enterprises who are producers. The creation of the collective members or any other entity. In other mark, in fact, must go hand in hand with words, a collective Trade Mark or the development of certain standards collective mark is a Trade Mark owned and criteria and a common strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Open Access Journal available at jlsr.thelawbrigade.com 424 EXPANDING BOUNDARIES OF SCOPE OF TRADEMARKS: LEGAL STUDY AND RESEARCH ON IT Written by Sudipta Patra Ph.D. Research Scholar of F.M. University, Assistant Professor of Law, Midnapore Law College, V. U., (Guide- Under the guidance of Dr. R.L. Jati of F.M. University) Abstract Trademark is one of the areas of the intellectual property and its purpose is to protect the mark of the product or that of a service. It is said that a trademark is a valuable business asset and a marketing tool which could help in financing of the business in a smooth way. A great revolution was found in the sphere of economic and financial arena due to Industrial revolution. Industrial revolution increased the production of goods. Through the printing media the publicity and the advertisement of those goods were started. The manufacturers or the suppliers of goods had started to provide different identifying marks to their goods or services. They started to do it to provide better protection to their goods. In modern times also it helps the customers to identify the goods or services easily. So, it is clear that trademarks greatly and significantly affect the financial and mercantile developments of a country in the contemporary arena of globalization. The aim of this Article is to discuss the expanding boundaries of scope of trademarks and to do the legal study and research on it properly. Introduction A trademark is defined as a mark capable of being represented graphically and which is capable of distinguishing the goods and the services of one person from those of others and may include the shape of goods, their packaging and combination of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • TRADE MARKS GUIDE EVERYTHING YOU NEED to KNOW ABOUT TRADE MARKS in AUSTRALIA Spruson.Com CONTENTS
    TRADE MARKS GUIDE EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TRADE MARKS IN AUSTRALIA spruson.com CONTENTS Introduction 4 What is a Trade Mark? 5 Trade Mark Selection 5 Trade Mark Registration 7 National vs. International 9 Trade Marks Trade Mark Use 10 Trade Mark Enforcement, 11 Protection & Management Trade Mark Assignments 13 & Licensing Business Names, Company Names 15 & Domain Names Trade Mark Checklist 17 TRADE MARKS GUIDE Welcome! Thank you for taking the time to pick up our Trade Marks Guide. The guide is intended to be fairly comprehensive, providing you with an understanding of the importance of trade marks, including the trade mark lifecycle, how to protect and use a trade mark and how to maximise the value of your trade mark. We hope it helps you to gain an understanding and appreciation of the nuances of trade marks and their place in the commercial world. We’ve included tips throughout the guide to help you along the way. A LITTLE ABOUT SPRUSON & FERGUSON Spruson & Ferguson’s Trade Marks team acts for a Spruson & Ferguson is a leading intellectual property (IP) diverse range of clients from the world’s leading brands firm providing a range of IP services throughout the Asia- to Australian start-ups. Our highly qualified trade mark Pacific region from our our Bangkok, Beijing, Brisbane, attorneys file more than 5,000 trade mark applications each Hong Kong, Jakarta, Kuala Lumpur, Melbourne, Singapore year and provide a comprehensive trade mark protection and Sydney offices. service across the Asia-Pacific region. We advise on all aspects of the trade mark lifecycle, including brand creation, With a combined team of over 400 people, including patent registering a trade mark in Australia and overseas, filing, all attorneys, trade mark attorneys and IP lawyers, Spruson aspects of trade mark prosecution, defending actions for & Ferguson is one of the only IP firms with true regional removal and monitoring correct trade mark usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar on Geographical Indications
    SEMINAR ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS Denis SAUTIER, PhD Agrofood Economist, CIRAD - FRANCE Brunei Darussalam | 18 September 2019 GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COMPLEMENTARITY WITH OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS GIs, Trademarks, Collective Trademarks, Certification Trademarks 3 Different Concepts of IP Protection Certification Geographical Trademark Collective Mark Mark Indication What is a Geographical Indication? Indication which identify a good as originating in a certain territory, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin. Kobe beef 5 Function of a GI Registering a GI confers an • individual right of use of the name • to each producer complying with the GI specific Standards • non-exclusive (applies to all compliant producers within the defined area) What is a trademark? Any signs capable of being represented graphically, • Particularly words, including: –personal names, –designs, –letters, –numerals, –the shape of goods or of their packaging • Provided that such signs are capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings 7 Collective and Certification Marks Collective Mark Certification Mark . Holder: association of producers . Holder: independent entity . Holder may use the mark . Holder cannot used the mark . Can only be used by members of . Control by owner of CTM the association . Can be used by all those who . Control by association of producers comply with the regulations for the use of the mark Trade Marks and GIs • Geographical Indications: • Geographical indications identify a product or service as originating from a particular geographical area, independently from the company that produces it.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Trade Mark Distinctive Function and the Role in Comparative Advertising
    Master’s Degree in Global Development and Entrepreneurship Final Thesis The “twilight” of trade mark distinctive function and the role in comparative advertising Supervisor Ch. Prof. Alessandra Zanardo Graduand Roberta Attanasi Matricolation number 851279 Academic Year 2018 / 2019 Index Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER Ⅰ: THE EVOLUTION OF TRADE MARK FUNCTIONS 1.1 The context: basics of intellectual property (IP) ................................................. 5 1.2 Trade mark: notions, role as a distinctive sign ................................................... 8 1.2.1 Typologies of trade mark ................................................................................... 10 1.2.2 Unregistered trademark ...................................................................................... 15 1.3 Trade mark: the development of functions ....................................................... 16 1.4 From the old system to the reform of 1992 ...................................................... 20 1.5 The changes after 1992 and the “crisis” of traditional origin function .................. 26 1.5.1 Further features of protection: the development of secondary meaning and vulgarization ............................................................................................................... 37 1.6 Qualitative guarantee function ....................................................................... 47 1.7 Advertising function ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Trade Marks: Online Use and Anticybersquatting a European Perspective
    CMS Adonnino Ascoli & Cavasola Scamoni CMS Albiñana & Suárez de Lezo CMS Bureau Francis Lefebvre CMS Cameron McKenna LLP CMS DeBacker CMS Derks Star Busmann CMS von Erlach Henrici CMS Hasche Sigle CMS Reich-Rohrwig Hainz Protection of Trade Marks: Online Use and Anticybersquatting A European Perspective A CMS IP Group Publication Introduction Trade marks are essential for building business reputations in the modern business world. They enable customers to identify goods and services and develop brand loyalty. Trade marks also strengthen the effectiveness of advertising. Over time, trade marks develop their own brand identity independent of the goods and services they promote. This is particularly relevant as trade marks are increasingly promoted and used in modern media, such as the Internet. Trade marks on the Internet may be used to distinguish the goods and services of one undertaking from those of another, or without reference to relevant goods and services. When trade marks are used in relation to specific goods or services on the Internet, trade mark infringement can be dealt with in much the same way as it would be in any other media. Problems arise when trade marks are used on the Internet without any reference to the goods or services to which they relate. Not all countries have legislation which allows trade mark owners to protect their trade marks against such unauthorised use. Trade marks can be used on the Internet without reference to goods and services in domain names, links, metatags, pop-up ads, framing and spam messages. Such use of trade marks may be either legally justified or constitute trade mark infringement.
    [Show full text]
  • The Registration of Trade Marks for Goods & Services
    General Information Concerning THE REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS FOR GOODS & SERVICES 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 1. What is a trade mark? 6 2. The benefi ts of trade mark registration 7 3. Is registration of a trade mark compulsory? 7 4. Grounds for refusal of registration of a trade mark 8 5. Use of state emblems 10 6. Classifi cation of goods and services 10 7. Trade Mark Searches 12 8. Cross Class Searching 13 9. Classifi cation of Figurative Trade Marks 13 10. How to Apply for Registration 13 11. What are the requirements for a fi ling date? 19 12. Claiming Priority 19 13. Amendment to an application after fi ling 20 14. The Application Procedure 20 Introduction 2 Registration of Trade Marks 15. Duration of registration & renewal of registration 21 16. Assignment of a Trade Mark 21 17. Licensing of Trade Marks 21 18. Alteration to Registered Trade Marks 21 19. Protection Abroad 22 20. Signs Used to identify Trade Marks 29 21. Trade Mark Agents 29 22. Journal of the Intellectual Property Oce of Ireland 30 23. Business Names 30 24. Domain Names 31 Annex 1 Nic cation 32 Annex 2 Cross class search list 35 Annex 3 Flowchart of trade mark application procedure 36 3 4 Registration of Trade Marks Introduction This booklet summarises certain important provisions and requirements of the Trade Marks Act, 1996, and the Trade Marks Rules, 1996, in relation to the registration of Trade Marks. It is intended as a general guide to the system of registration of trade marks and consequently does not analyse every aspect of the process of registering a Trade Mark ect a particular application.
    [Show full text]