Α-Secretase Processing of the Alzheimer Amyloid-Β Precursor Protein and Its Homolog APLP2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Α-Secretase Processing of the Alzheimer Amyloid-Β Precursor Protein and Its Homolog APLP2 α-Secretase processing of the Alzheimer amyloid-β precursor protein and its homolog APLP2 Kristin Jacobsen 1 Doctoral dissertation, 2013 Department of Neurochemistry Arrhenius Laboratories for Natural Sciences Stockholm University Cover: Schematic illustration of APP and APLP2 processing during stimulated conditions ©Kristin T. Jacobsen, Stockholm University 2013 ISBN 978-91-7447-732-0 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2013 Distributor: Department of Neurochemistry, Stockholm University 2 To my family 3 4 List of Publications I. Jacobsen KT, Adlerz L, Multhaup G and Iverfeldt K. IGF-1-induced processing of amyloid-β precursor protein and APP-like protein 2 is mediated by different enzymes Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010; 285 (14): 10223-10231 II. Holback S, Adlerz L, Gatsinzi T, Jacobsen KT and Iverfeldt K PI3-K- and PKC-dependent up-regulation of APP processing enzymes by retinoic acid Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2008; 365(2): 298-303 III. Jacobsen KT and Iverfeldt K. O-GlcNAcylation increases non-amyloidogenic processing of the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2011; 404(3): 882-886 IV. Jacobsen KT, Strååt Y, Koistinen N and Iverfeldt K. O-GlcNAcylation of the α-secretase ADAM10 selectively affects APP processing in neuron-like cells Manuscript V. Jacobsen KT and Iverfeldt K The E1 domain of APP and APLP2 determines α-secretase specificity Manuscript 5 Additional publications . Jacobsen KT and Iverfeldt K Amyloid precursor protein and its homologues: a family of proteolysis-dependent receptors Cellular and Molecular Life Science. 2009; 66: 2299-2318 (Review) . Tracy, LM, Bergqvist F, Ivanova EV, Jacobsen KT and Iverfeldt K Exposure to the saturated free fatty acid palmitate alters BV-2 microglia inflammatory response Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. 2013; 51(3): 805-812 6 Abstract The amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) has been widely studied due to its role in Alzheimer´s disease (AD). When APP is sequentially cleaved by β- and γ-secretase, amyloid-β (Aβ) is formed. Aβ is prone to aggregate and is toxic to neurons. However, the main processing pathway for APP involves initial cleavage at the α-site, within the Aβ region, instead generating a neu- roprotective soluble fragment, sAPPα. APP is a member of a protein family, also including the proteins APLP1 and APLP2, which are processed in a similar way as APP. In addition, knock-out studies in mice have shown that the three proteins have overlapping functions where APLP2 play a key phys- iological role. The aim of this thesis was to study mechanisms regulating the α-secretase processing of APP and APLP2. We have used the human neuro- blastoma cell line SH-SY5Y as a model system and have stimulated α- secretase processing with insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) or retinoic acid (RA). Our results show that the stimulated α-site cleavage of APP and APLP2 is regulated by different signaling pathways and that the cleavage is mediated by different enzymes. APP was shown to be cleaved by ADAM10 in a PI3K-dependent manner, whereas APLP2 was cleaved by TACE in a PKC-dependent manner. We further show that protein levels and maturation of ADAM10 and TACE is increased in response to RA, mediated by a PI3K- or PKC-dependent signaling pathway, respectively. Another focus of our research has been O-GlcNAcylation, a dynamic post-translational modifica- tion regulated by the enzymes O-GlcNAc transferase and O-GlcNAcase (OGA). We show that decreased OGA activity stimulates sAPPα secretion, without affecting APLP2 processing. We further show that ADAM10 is O- GlcNAcylated. Lastly, we show that APP can be manipulated to be cleaved in a similar way as APLP2 during IGF-1 stimulation by substituting the E1 domain in APP with the E1 domain from APLP2. Together our results show distinct α-site processing mechanisms of APP and APLP2. 7 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 13 1.1 The role of APP in Alzheimer’s disease ......................................................... 13 1.2 The APP family .................................................................................................. 14 1.2.1 Structure ................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Proteolytic processing ............................................................................. 17 1.2.3 Biological functions ................................................................................. 19 1.3 Processing enzymes ......................................................................................... 21 1.3.1 α-Secretase .............................................................................................. 21 1.3.1.1 Substrate selectivity of TACE and ADAM10 ............................... 23 1.3.2 β-Secretase .............................................................................................. 24 1.3.3 γ-Secretase............................................................................................... 25 1.4 Signaling pathways affecting APP family processing ................................. 26 1.4.1 IGF-1 .......................................................................................................... 26 1.4.2 Retinoic acid ............................................................................................. 27 1.5 Regulation of APP family α-site processing ................................................. 28 1.5.1 Trafficking of enzyme and substrate .................................................... 28 1.5.2 Post-translational modifications of enzyme and substrate .............. 30 1.5.2.1 Post-translational modifications of ADAM10 and TACE............ 31 1.5.2.2 Post-translational modifications of the APP family ................... 32 2. Methodological considerations ..................................................... 34 2.1 Cell lines ............................................................................................................. 34 2.2 Cell treatments ................................................................................................. 35 2.2.1 Retinoic acid and IGF-1 .......................................................................... 35 2.2.2 Pharmacological inhibitors ..................................................................... 35 2.3 siRNA gene silencing ........................................................................................ 36 2.4 BCA assay .......................................................................................................... 36 2.5 Western blot ...................................................................................................... 37 2.6 ELISA .................................................................................................................. 37 2.7 32P-labeling and immunoprecipitation .......................................................... 38 2.8 sWGA precipitation ........................................................................................... 39 2.9 Biotinylation assay ........................................................................................... 39 2.10 Design and cloning of the APP/APLP2 chimer ........................................... 39 3. Aims ....................................................................................................... 41 4. Results and discussion .................................................................... 42 8 4.1 Stimulated α-secretase processing of APP is mediated by ADAM10 in a PI3K-dependent manner (Paper I and II) ........................................................... 42 4.2 Stimulated α-secretase processing of APLP2 is mediated by TACE in a PKC-dependent manner (Paper I and II) ............................................................ 44 4.3 O-GlcNAcylation induces α-secretase processing of APP but not of APLP2 (Paper III and IV) .................................................................................................... 45 4.3.1 O-GlcNAcylation selectively enhances α-secretase processing of APP in neuron-like cells (Paper IV) ................................................................. 46 4.3.2 ADAM10 is O-GlcNAcylated (Paper IV) ................................................ 47 4.4 The difference in regulation of α-secretase processing between APP and APLP2 is determined by their E1 domain (Paper III) ........................................ 48 4.5 What about APLP1? (Paper I and IV) ........................................................... 50 5. Conclusions ......................................................................................... 51 6. Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning på svenska ............... 53 7. Acknowledgements .......................................................................... 55 8. References ........................................................................................... 57 9 Abbreviations Aβ Amyloid-β AD Alzheimer’s Disease ADAM A disintegrin and metalloprotease AICD APP intracellular domain ALID APP-like intracellular domain ANOVA Analysis of variance APH-1 Anterior pharynx defective-1 APLP APP-like protein APP Amyloid-β precursor protein BACE β-site cleaving enzyme BCA Bicinchoninic acid BDNF Brain-derived neurotrophic factor C83 APP C-terminal stub of 83 amino acids C99 APP C-terminal stub of 99 amino acids CNS Central nervous system CRABs Cellular retinoic
Recommended publications
  • ACE2/ADAM17/TMPRSS2 Interplay May Be the Main Risk Factor for COVID-19
    REVIEW published: 07 October 2020 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.576745 ACE2/ADAM17/TMPRSS2 Interplay May Be the Main Risk Factor for COVID-19 † † Donato Zipeto 1 , Julys da Fonseca Palmeira 2 , Gustavo A. Argañaraz 2 and Enrique R. Argañaraz 2* 1 Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy, 2 Laboratory of Molecular Neurovirology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Bras´ılia, Brasilia, Brazil The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has already caused hundreds of thousands of deaths worldwide in a few months. Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes and chronic lung disease have been identified as the main COVID-19 comorbidities. Moreover, Edited by: despite similar infection rates between men and women, the most severe course of the Yolande Richard, Institut National de la Sante´ et de la disease is higher in elderly and co-morbid male patients. Therefore, the occurrence of Recherche Me´ dicale (INSERM), specific comorbidities associated with renin–angiotensin system (RAS) imbalance France mediated by the interaction between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and Reviewed by: desintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 17 (ADAM17), along with specific genetic Andreas Ludwig, RWTH Aachen University, factors mainly associated with type II transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2) Germany expression, could be decisive for the clinical outcome of COVID-19. Indeed, the Elena Ciaglia, — University of Salerno, Italy exacerbated ADAM17 mediated ACE2, TNF-a, and IL-6R secretion emerges as a Rumi Ueha, possible underlying mechanism for the acute inflammatory immune response and the University of Tokyo, Japan activation of the coagulation cascade. Therefore, in this review, we focus on the main *Correspondence: pathophysiological aspects of ACE2, ADAM17, and TMPRSS2 host proteins in COVID- Enrique R.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Glycation End Products Evoke Endothelial Cell Damage By
    Ishibashi et al. Cardiovascular Diabetology 2013, 12:125 CARDIO http://www.cardiab.com/content/12/1/125 VASCULAR DIABETOLOGY ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Open Access Advanced glycation end products evoke endothelial cell damage by stimulating soluble dipeptidyl peptidase-4 production and its interaction with mannose 6-phosphate/insulin- like growth factor II receptor Yuji Ishibashi1, Takanori Matsui1, Sayaka Maeda1, Yuichiro Higashimoto2 and Sho-ichi Yamagishi1* Abstract Background: Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and receptor RAGE interaction play a role in diabetic vascular complications. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a potential therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes. However, the role of DPP-4 in AGE-induced endothelial cell (EC) damage remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we investigated the effects of DPP-4 on reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and RAGE gene expression in ECs. We further examined whether an inhibitor of DPP-4, linagliptin inhibited AGE-induced soluble DPP-4 production, ROS generation, RAGE, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene expression in ECs. Results: DPP-4 dose-dependently increased ROS generation and RAGE gene expression in ECs, which were prevented by linagliptin. Mannose 6-phosphate (M6P) and antibodies (Ab) raised against M6P/insulin-like growth factor II receptor (M6P/IGF-IIR) completely blocked the ROS generation in DPP-4-exposed ECs, whereas surface plasmon resonance revealed that DPP-4 bound to M6P/IGF-IIR at the dissociation constant of 3.59 x 10-5 M. AGEs or hydrogen peroxide increased soluble DPP-4 production by ECs, which was prevented by N-acetylcysteine, RAGE-Ab or linagliptin.
    [Show full text]
  • 81969413.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector European Journal of Pharmacology 698 (2013) 74–86 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect European Journal of Pharmacology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejphar Molecular and cellular pharmacology Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibition upregulates GLUT4 translocation and expression in heart and skeletal muscle of spontaneously hypertensive rats Gisele Giannocco a,b, Kelen C. Oliveira a,b, Renato O. Crajoinas c, Gabriela Venturini c, Thiago A. Salles c, Miriam H. Fonseca-Alaniz c, Rui M.B. Maciel b, Adriana C.C. Girardi c,n a Department of Morphology and Physiology, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo Andre´,Sao~ Paulo, SP, Brazil b Department of Medicine, Federal University of Sao~ Paulo, Sao~ Paulo, SP, Brazil c University of Sao~ Paulo Medical School, Heart Institute, Laboratory of Genetics and Molecular Cardiology, Avenida Dr. Ene´as de Carvalho Aguiar 44, 101 andar, Bloco II, 05403-900 Sao Paulo, Brazil article info abstract Article history: The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that the dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV) Received 26 January 2012 inhibitor sitagliptin, which exerts anti-hyperglycemic and anti-hypertensive effects, upregulates GLUT4 Received in revised form translocation, protein levels, and/or mRNA expression in heart and skeletal muscle of spontaneously 19 September 2012 hypertensive rats (SHRs). Ten days of treatment with sitagliptin (40 mg/kg twice daily) decreased Accepted 21 September 2012 plasma DPPIV activity in both young (Y, 5-week-old) and adult (A, 20-week-old) SHRs to similar Available online 7 October 2012 extents (85%).
    [Show full text]
  • Prion Fragment Peptides Are Digested with Membrane Type Matrix Metalloproteinases and Acquire Enzyme Resistance Through Cu2+-Binding
    Biomolecules 2014, 4, 510-526; doi:10.3390/biom4020510 OPEN ACCESS biomolecules ISSN 2218-273X www.mdpi.com/journal/biomolecules/ Article Prion Fragment Peptides Are Digested with Membrane Type Matrix Metalloproteinases and Acquire Enzyme Resistance through Cu2+-Binding Aya Kojima 1,2, Motomi Konishi 1 and Toshifumi Akizawa 1,* 1 Analytical Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Setsunan University, 45-1 Nagaotoge-cho, Hirakata, Osaka 573-0101, Japan; E-Mails: [email protected] (A.K.); [email protected] (M.K.) 2 Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Cancer Biology, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 180-8639, Japan * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +81-72-866-3129. Received: 31 January 2014; in revised form: 2 April 2014 / Accepted: 11 April 2014 / Published: 8 May 2014 Abstract: Prions are the cause of neurodegenerative disease in humans and other mammals. The structural conversion of the prion protein (PrP) from a normal cellular protein (PrPC) to a protease-resistant isoform (PrPSc) is thought to relate to Cu2+ binding to histidine residues. In this study, we focused on the membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases (MT-MMPs) such as MT1-MMP and MT3-MMP, which are expressed in the brain as PrPC-degrading proteases. We synthesized 21 prion fragment peptides. Each purified peptide was individually incubated with recombinant MT1-MMP or MT3-MMP in the presence or absence of Cu2+ and the cleavage sites determined by LC-ESI-MS analysis. Recombinant MMP-7 and human serum (HS) were also tested as control.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for the Sheddase Function of Human Meprin Β Metalloproteinase at the Plasma Membrane
    Structural basis for the sheddase function of human meprin β metalloproteinase at the plasma membrane Joan L. Arolasa, Claudia Broderb, Tamara Jeffersonb, Tibisay Guevaraa, Erwin E. Sterchic, Wolfram Boded, Walter Stöckere, Christoph Becker-Paulyb, and F. Xavier Gomis-Rütha,1 aProteolysis Laboratory, Department of Structural Biology, Molecular Biology Institute of Barcelona, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Barcelona Science Park, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain; bInstitute of Biochemistry, Unit for Degradomics of the Protease Web, University of Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany; cInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Berne, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland; dArbeitsgruppe Proteinaseforschung, Max-Planck-Institute für Biochemie, D-82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; and eInstitute of Zoology, Cell and Matrix Biology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, D-55128 Mainz, Germany Edited by Brian W. Matthews, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, and approved August 22, 2012 (received for review June 29, 2012) Ectodomain shedding at the cell surface is a major mechanism to proteolysis” step within the membrane (1). This is the case for the regulate the extracellular and circulatory concentration or the processing of Notch ligand Delta1 and of APP, both carried out by activities of signaling proteins at the plasma membrane. Human γ-secretase after action of an α/β-secretase (11), and for signal- meprin β is a 145-kDa disulfide-linked homodimeric multidomain peptide peptidase, which removes remnants of the secretory pro- type-I membrane metallopeptidase that sheds membrane-bound tein translocation from the endoplasmic membrane (13). cytokines and growth factors, thereby contributing to inflammatory Recently, human meprin β (Mβ) was found to specifically pro- diseases, angiogenesis, and tumor progression.
    [Show full text]
  • ADAM10 Site-Dependent Biology: Keeping Control of a Pervasive Protease
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review ADAM10 Site-Dependent Biology: Keeping Control of a Pervasive Protease Francesca Tosetti 1,* , Massimo Alessio 2, Alessandro Poggi 1,† and Maria Raffaella Zocchi 3,† 1 Molecular Oncology and Angiogenesis Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico S. Martino Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy; [email protected] 2 Proteome Biochemistry, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 3 Division of Immunology, Transplants and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work as last author. Abstract: Enzymes, once considered static molecular machines acting in defined spatial patterns and sites of action, move to different intra- and extracellular locations, changing their function. This topological regulation revealed a close cross-talk between proteases and signaling events involving post-translational modifications, membrane tyrosine kinase receptors and G-protein coupled recep- tors, motor proteins shuttling cargos in intracellular vesicles, and small-molecule messengers. Here, we highlight recent advances in our knowledge of regulation and function of A Disintegrin And Metalloproteinase (ADAM) endopeptidases at specific subcellular sites, or in multimolecular com- plexes, with a special focus on ADAM10, and tumor necrosis factor-α convertase (TACE/ADAM17), since these two enzymes belong to the same family, share selected substrates and bioactivity. We will discuss some examples of ADAM10 activity modulated by changing partners and subcellular compartmentalization, with the underlying hypothesis that restraining protease activity by spatial Citation: Tosetti, F.; Alessio, M.; segregation is a complex and powerful regulatory tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Evolutionary Conserved Modules in Gene Networks As a Strategy to Leverage High Throughput Gene Expression Queries Jeanne M
    Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications 9-2010 Using Evolutionary Conserved Modules in Gene Networks as a Strategy to Leverage High Throughput Gene Expression Queries Jeanne M. Serb Iowa State University, [email protected] Megan C. Orr Iowa State University M. Heather West Greenlee Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/eeob_ag_pubs Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Systems Biology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ eeob_ag_pubs/19. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Using Evolutionary Conserved Modules in Gene Networks as a Strategy to Leverage High Throughput Gene Expression Queries Abstract Background: Large-scale gene expression studies have not yielded the expected insight into genetic networks that control complex processes. These anticipated discoveries have been limited not by technology, but by a lack of effective strategies to investigate the data in a manageable and meaningful way. Previous work suggests that using a pre-determined seednetwork of gene relationships to query large-scale expression datasets is an effective way to generate candidate genes for further study and network expansion or enrichment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Potential Role for APLP2 in Axogenesis
    The Journal of Neuroscience, October 1995, 15(10): 63144326 Distribution of an APP Homolog, APLP2, in the Mouse Olfactory System: A Potential Role for APLP2 in Axogenesis Gopal Thinakaran,1,5 Cheryl A. Kitt, 1,5 A. Jane I. Roskams,” Hilda H. Slunt,1,5 Eliezer Masliah,’ Cornelia von Koch,2,5 Stephen D. Ginsberg,i,5 Gabriele V. Ronnett,‘s4 Randall Ft. Reed,233I6 Donald L. Price,‘,2.4,5 and Sangram S. Sisodiaiz5 ‘Departments of Pathology, 2Neuroscience, 3Molecular Biology and Genetics, and 4Neurology, 5Neuropathology Laboratory, and the 6Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205 and ‘Departments of Neurosciences and Pathology and Neuroscience, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093 Deposition of l3-amyloid (AS) in senile plaques is a major APLP2, alternative splicing, chondroitin sulfate glycosami- pathological characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease. Ap is noglycan, glomeruli, olfactory epithelium, o/factory sen- generated by proteolytic processing of amyloici precursor sory neurons] proteins (APP). APP is a member of a family of related poly- peptides that includes amyloid precursor-like proteins A principal pathological feature of Alzheimer’s disease is the APLPl and APLPS. To examine the distribution of APLP2 deposition of Al3 in brain parenchyma (Glenner and Wong, in the nervous system, we generated antibodies specific 1984; Masters et al., 1985). Al3, an -4 kDa polypeptide, is for APLPS and used these reagents in immunocytochemi- derived from larger type I integral membrane glycoproteins, cal and biochemical studies of the rodent nervous system. termed the amyloid precursor proteins (APP) (Kang et al., 1987; In this report, we document that in cortex and hippocam- Kitaguchi et al., 1988; Ponte et al., 1988; Tanzi et al., 1988; pus, APLPS is enriched in postsynaptic compartments.
    [Show full text]
  • APLP2 Regulates Refractive Error and Myopia Development in Mice and Humans
    Tkatchenko, A. V., Tkatchenko, T. V., Guggenheim, J. A., Verhoeven, V. J. M., Hysi, P. G., Wojciechowski, R., Singh, P. K., Kumar, A., Thinakaran, G., Williams, C. (2015). APLP2 Regulates Refractive Error and Myopia Development in Mice and Humans. PLoS Genetics, 11(8), [e1005432]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005432 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005432 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Public Library of Science at http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005432. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ RESEARCH ARTICLE APLP2 Regulates Refractive Error and Myopia Development in Mice and Humans Andrei V. Tkatchenko1,2☯*, Tatiana V. Tkatchenko1☯, Jeremy A. Guggenheim3☯, Virginie J. M. Verhoeven4,5, Pirro G. Hysi6, Robert Wojciechowski7,8, Pawan Kumar Singh9, Ashok Kumar9,10, Gopal Thinakaran11, Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM)¶, Cathy Williams12 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United
    [Show full text]
  • The Positive Side of Proteolysis in Alzheimer's Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Biochemistry Research International Volume 2011, Article ID 721463, 13 pages doi:10.1155/2011/721463 Review Article Zinc Metalloproteinases and Amyloid Beta-Peptide Metabolism: The Positive Side of Proteolysis in Alzheimer’s Disease Mallory Gough, Catherine Parr-Sturgess, and Edward Parkin Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Edward Parkin, [email protected] Received 17 August 2010; Accepted 7 September 2010 Academic Editor: Simon J. Morley Copyright © 2011 Mallory Gough et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by an accumulation of toxic amyloid beta- (Aβ-)peptides in the brain causing progressive neuronal death. Aβ-peptides are produced by aspartyl proteinase-mediated cleavage of the larger amyloid precursor protein (APP). In contrast to this detrimental “amyloidogenic” form of proteolysis, a range of zinc metalloproteinases can process APP via an alternative “nonamyloidogenic” pathway in which the protein is cleaved within its Aβ region thereby precluding the formation of intact Aβ-peptides. In addition, other members of the zinc metalloproteinase family can degrade preformed Aβ-peptides. As such, the zinc metalloproteinases, collectively, are key to downregulating Aβ generation and enhancing its degradation. It is the role of zinc metalloproteinases in this “positive side of proteolysis in Alzheimer’s disease” that is discussed in the current paper. 1. Introduction of 38–43 amino acid peptides called amyloid beta (Aβ)- peptides.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their
    [CANCER RESEARCH 53, 4493-4498, October 1, 1993] Secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors (Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases) by Human Prostate in Explant Cultures: Reduced Tissue Inhibitor of Metailoproteinase Secretion by Malignant Tissues 1 Balakrishna L. Lokeshwar, 2 Marie G. Seizer, Norman L. Block, and Zeenat Gunja-Smith Departments of Urology [B. L. L., M. G. S., N. L. B.] and Medicine [Z. G-S.], University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101 ABSTRACT V, and IX, as well as the noncollagenous components of the extracel- lular matrix, including laminin and fibronectin (6). In addition, Unregulated secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) or their MMP-3 is also known to activate procollagenases (7). Increased levels endogenous protein inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, of these proteinases have been implicated with the invasive potential TIMPs) has been implicated in tumor invasion and metastasis. Species of MMPs and TIMPs secreted by epithelial cultures of normal, benign, and of tumors (8-10). malignant prostate were identified and their levels were compared. Frag- Matrixins secreted by normal cells are proenzymes (zymogens) and ments of fresh tissue were cultured in a serum-free medium that supported are inactive (11). This is due to a highly conserved sequence of nine the outgrowth of prostatic epithelial cells. Biochemical analysis of the amino acid residues in the propeptide region containing a solitary conditioned media by gelatin zymography and enzyme assays showed that cysteine residue bound to the metal ion, Zn 2+, at the active center both normal and neoplastic tissues secreted latent and active forms of both (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Zinc Metalloproteinases and Amyloid Beta-Peptide Metabolism: the Positive Side of Proteolysis in Alzheimer’S Disease
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Biochemistry Research International Volume 2011, Article ID 721463, 13 pages doi:10.1155/2011/721463 Review Article Zinc Metalloproteinases and Amyloid Beta-Peptide Metabolism: The Positive Side of Proteolysis in Alzheimer’s Disease Mallory Gough, Catherine Parr-Sturgess, and Edward Parkin Division of Biomedical and Life Sciences, School of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK Correspondence should be addressed to Edward Parkin, [email protected] Received 17 August 2010; Accepted 7 September 2010 Academic Editor: Simon J. Morley Copyright © 2011 Mallory Gough et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Alzheimer’s disease is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by an accumulation of toxic amyloid beta- (Aβ-)peptides in the brain causing progressive neuronal death. Aβ-peptides are produced by aspartyl proteinase-mediated cleavage of the larger amyloid precursor protein (APP). In contrast to this detrimental “amyloidogenic” form of proteolysis, a range of zinc metalloproteinases can process APP via an alternative “nonamyloidogenic” pathway in which the protein is cleaved within its Aβ region thereby precluding the formation of intact Aβ-peptides. In addition, other members of the zinc metalloproteinase family can degrade preformed Aβ-peptides. As such, the zinc metalloproteinases, collectively, are key to downregulating Aβ generation and enhancing its degradation. It is the role of zinc metalloproteinases in this “positive side of proteolysis in Alzheimer’s disease” that is discussed in the current paper. 1. Introduction of 38–43 amino acid peptides called amyloid beta (Aβ)- peptides.
    [Show full text]