DOCSLIB.ORG

The and So the Story Continues: the River and the Road, Each Changing River in Response to the Other — the So Inclined

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The and So the Story Continues: the River and the Road, Each Changing River in Response to the Other — the So Inclined The Riverand the Road The compelling story of the Big Thompson River, US 34, and human resilience in the face of tragedy Published by the Colorado Department of Transportation Big Thompson River Waterbody Big Thompson US Highway/ Community Interstate Historical River & Road Other Road Other River/Creek Features City/Town N O M R I T H L B L L F E A O R NORTH R C F O K B K U B R C I K C E C G D K A F R K T O C K H E D X H R E RT H O R C O O F R R N N Y O O N E M S E K P R K K C B C E R E I G R E R Glen T E E E C H K Haven O M K N P S O N Horseshoe I A W D S O Curve N E S T K 43 P N I C R E E M Drake C Y O 43 O N N A H E R T V Stony The Waltonia I River Lodge The Dam R Store LOVELAND G Narrows Cedar 34 To 34 N Colorado Rocky I O Cove Cherry Loveland P S Mountain Heights H O M Company National T Cottages B Park G C I O B T T O N Glen W O K Comfort Pole E 34 O E Hill D R S C Whispering OL Pines Motel I T U Olympus D E ESTES Dam C Bald K N O R T H PARK F O Mtn R K L I T T L E T H 36 O M P S Fort L O Collins LAKE I ESTES T N Rattlesnake T CA Rocky L R Park E MUGGINS GULCH Mtn Greeley K I Estes R NP T V 34 E Park TER LAKE H E 34 E Loveland R O to C R E M 36 Wray, S H A Wiggins I S P Lyons I-25 F T S O N F R O I R V E 36 K R 7 F Boulder I S H C To Lyons K 021.25 .5 57.5 10 Miles Denver The Big Thompson River and US 34, Larimer County, Colorado The Riverand the Road This book is dedicated to the people who lost their lives in the Big Thompson Canyon floods of 1976 and 2013, and to Scott Ellis, late CDOT Region 4 Resident Engineer and first 2013 post-flood Project Manager. Created by for the October 2019 ii — The River and the Road Project Lead Colorado Department of Transportation Jason Marmor Historical Research & Writing Jacobs Engineering Group Patricia Steinholtz Historical Research and Contributors Centennial Archaeology Kristin A. Gensmer Eva M. Garner Document & Graphic Design Jacobs Engineering Group Patricia Steinholtz Proofreading Jacobs Engineering Group Misty Swan Printing Steuben Press, Longmont, CO Published by the Colorado Department of Transportation 2019 Front Cover Image: Colorado Department of Transportation, 2013 flood Back Cover Image: Colorado State University, 1976 flood The River and the Road — iii Table of Contents Foreword v Introduction vii Chapter 1: The River 1-1 Chapter 2: The Road 2-1 Chapter 3: The 1976 Flood 3-1 Chapter 4: The 2013 Flood 4-1 Chapter 5: The Future 5-1 Image source: CDOT iv — The River and the Road The River and the Road – v Foreword This is the story of the enduring struggle to forge and maintain a transportation connection through the Big Thompson Canyon to Estes Park. Constructed more than 100 years ago, the first road established Image source: CDOT that connection and paved the way for recreation and settlement in the canyon. Since then, major flooding of the Big Thompson River has claimed lives and caused catastrophic damage to property, infrastructure, and natural habitats. Throughout both the 1976 and 2013 floods, the human spirit was tested, but not broken. Meet the people who barely survived these disasters, those who tragically did not, as well as those who tended to the injured, picked up the pieces, and did the seemingly impossible. As a member of the Colorado Department of Transportation team who Johnny Olson has been part of this story, I encourage you to learn more about the river, the road, CDOT Deputy Director and most importantly, the power of human persistence. June 28, 2019 Image source: CDOT vi — The River and the Road Foreword The River and the Road – vii Introduction This is the story of the Big Thompson River, its namesake canyon, and United States Highway (US) 34 ...which hugs the river’s Despite its alluring natural meandering curves. beauty, the Big Thompson It is the story of the river River, which is confined by and the road. high walls of the surrounding canyon, is prone to dramatic Image source: CDOT flood events. This story speaks of awe-inspiring plains, each influencing the other ever the first natural beauty, human determination, since travelers began venturing through mountain exceptional feats of engineering, and the canyon. range west of the Great Plains. The tragically, staggering devastation and precipitous roads from the flatlands to poignant acts of heroism — all of which Lauded as “the very gem of beauty,”1 Estes Park presented a multi-day trial coalesce around one thing — the Big the high alpine valley that would become even for those who came prepared.2 Thompson River. The river and the the Town of Estes Park lured explorers road are inextricably bound together, and travelers from afar. However, The Big Thompson Canyon beckoned. journeying side-by-side from lofty visitors faced a formidable obstacle The river had already cleaved a twisted mountain valleys to expansive, sweeping upon reaching Colorado’s Front Range, path through a high-walled chasm viii — The River and the Road “No motorist can really claim to have seen Colorado scenery at its zenith who has not driven the Big Thompson canon [sic],”4 proclaimed a journalist in 1920. Introduction The canyon’s natural beauty also lured settlers to put down roots along the river’s banks. People built summer cabins and permanent residences, and established businesses catering to Image source: Collection of P. Steinholtz Image source: Collection of P. an ever-increasing number of visitors and recreationists. Small residential communities sprang The canyon’s natural beauty up, some of which remain in the Big lured settlers to put down Thompson Canyon roots along the river’s banks. today.5 Yet few people knew Image source: P. Steinholtz the canyon held a devastating secret only those keen It wasn’t just the destination, but the journey through the Big to its clues could decipher. Stranded trees lodged uncharacteristically high Thompson Canyon that made the drive to Estes Park so extraordinary. above the stream bank, deeply incised canyon walls soaring up to 3,000 feet between the mountain town of Estes proved it could be done — barely.3 high, and sharply curving hairpin turns Park and the City of Loveland, situated Despite the road’s precarious condition, attest to millennia of violent scouring.6 prominently at the river’s mouth its use exploded, and with it, years of The beckoning beauty of the river and approximately 20 miles downstream. So challenging upgrades and modifications. canyon belied their potential peril — why not build a road along the river’s Word soon spread that it wasn’t just the flash floods. A 1971 study prepared edge? In 1903, construction of the destination, but the journey through by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “rough and bad” Riley’s Road through Big Thompson Canyon that made the determined that the Big Thompson River the canyon (the precursor to US 34) drive to Estes Park so extraordinary. flooded an average of once every six The River and the Road — ix years, the worst of which killed seven Yet just 37 years later, a Towering thunderheads in July 1976 people in 1951.7 But these floods were devastating flood struck just a precursor of the devastation that Colorado’s northern Front unleashed a year’s worth of rain. would soon come. Range in September 2013, once again hitting the Big Thompson On July 31, 1976, the Big Thompson particularly hard. While the 1976 Canyon was the site of one of the storm was over within hours, the rain most catastrophic natural disasters that began September 9, 2013, didn’t in Colorado history. The canyon was end until six days later. During that alive with activity, as thousands of time, “biblical” record-breaking rainfall people celebrated the state’s 100-year dropped the equivalent of one year’s birthday. Towering thunderheads worth of precipitation yet again.12 Ten unleashed a year’s worth of rain in people died in the 2013 flood throughout just over one hour. The river exploded the state, including two women who from an average depth of 18 inches lived in Big Thompson Canyon.13 to a 20-foot wall of water. By the time it was finished, Colorado’s deadliest The 2013 flood completely washed out or recorded flood had killed 144 people and significantly damaged nearly nine miles injured 250 more, destroyed 418 houses of US 34.14 The Colorado Department and 52 businesses, damaged 138 of Transportation (CDOT) immediately houses, washed away much of US 34, mobilized for emergency repairs, demolished the Big Thompson Siphon, reopening US 34 and caused more than $35 million in in November 2013. On July 31, 1976, the Big damages.8 Permanent repairs Thompson Canyon was alive were undertaken People wanted US 34 to be replaced later, with CDOT with activity, soon to become the 9 precisely where it had been.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00 UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL PARK. SERIES Copyright by WiswaU The Village of Estes Park nestles in a quiet little valley, surrounded by mountains Page two An Appreciation of Rocky Mountain National Park By ENOS A. MILLS, Author of "Wild Life on the Rockies," "The Rocky Mountain Wonderland," etc. Written Especially fer the United States Railroad Administration j]HE Rocky Mountain National Park is a marvelous grouping of gentle­ ness and grandeur; an eloquent, wordless hymn, sung in silent, poetic pictures; a wilderness mountain world of groves and grass plots, crags and canyons, rounded lakes with shadow-matted shores that rest in peace within the purple forest. There are wild flowers of every color, and many a silken meadow edged with ferns. Brokenness and beauty, terrace upon terrace, a magnificent hanging wild garden. Over these terraces waters rush and pour. From ice-sculptured, snow-piled peaks, young and eager streams leap in white cascades between crowding cliffs and pines. Through this wildness winds the trail, with its secrets of the centuries, where adventures come and go and where the magic camp fire blossoms in the night. In these primeval scenes the grizzly bear gives to the wilderness its master spell; the mountain ram poses on the cliff; the laughing, varied voice of the coyote echoes when the afterglow falls; the home-loving beaver builds his willow-fringed hut; the birds sing; the cheerful chipmunk frolics and never grows up; and here the world stays young. The Rocky Mountain National Park holds adventure for every visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properties and districts. See instruction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking ``x'' in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter ``N/A'' for ``not applicable.'' For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name East Longs Peak Trail; Longs Peak Trail; Keyhole Route; Shelf Trail other names/site number 5LR.11413; 5BL.10344 2. Location street & number West of State Highway 7 (ROMO) [N/A] not for publication city or town Allenspark [X] vicinity state Colorado code CO county Larimer; Boulder code 069; 013 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant [ ] nationally [ ] statewide [X] locally.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Merchants 4
    Merchant Name Date Registered Merchant Name Date Registered Merchant Name Date Registered 9001575*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9013807*HBC SRL 05/02/2018 9017439*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9001605*AGENZIA LAMPO SRL 05/02/2018 9013943*CASA EDITRICE LIB 05/02/2018 9017440*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003338*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014076*MAILUP SPA 05/02/2018 9017441*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003369*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014276*CCS ITALIA ONLUS 05/02/2018 9017442*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9003946*GIUNTI EDITORE SP 05/02/2018 9014368*EDITORIALE IL FAT 05/02/2018 9017574*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004061*FREDDY SPA 05/02/2018 9014569*SAVE THE CHILDREN 05/02/2018 9017575*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004904*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014616*OXFAM ITALIA 05/02/2018 9017576*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004949*ELEMEDIA SPA 05/02/2018 9014762*AMNESTY INTERNATI 05/02/2018 9017577*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9004972*ARUBA SPA 05/02/2018 9014949*LIS FINANZIARIA S 05/02/2018 9017578*PULCRANET SRL 05/02/2018 9005242*INTERSOS ASSOCIAZ 05/02/2018 9015096*FRATELLI CARLI SO 05/02/2018 9017676*PIERONI ROBERTO 05/02/2018 9005281*MESSAGENET SPA 05/02/2018 9015228*MEDIA SHOPPING SP 05/02/2018 9017907*ESITE SOCIETA A R 05/02/2018 9005607*EASY NOLO SPA 05/02/2018 9015229*SILVIO BARELLO 05/02/2018 9017955*LAV LEGA ANTIVIVI 05/02/2018 9006680*PERIODICI SAN PAO 05/02/2018 9015245*ASSURANT SERVICES 05/02/2018 9018029*MEDIA ON SRL 05/02/2018 9007043*INTERNET BOOKSHOP 05/02/2018 9015286*S.O.F.I.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 ON THE COVER Rocky Mountain National Park Photograph by: Billy Schweiger A Natural Resource Condition Assessment for Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2010/228 David M. Theobald1,2 Jill S. Baron2,3 Peter Newman1 Barry Noon4 John B. Norman III1,2 Ian Leinwand1 Sophia E. Linn1 Richard Sherer4 Katherine E. Williams2,5 Melannie Hartman2 1Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1480 2Natural Resource Ecology Lab, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1499 3U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, CO 80523 4Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1474 5Current address: Department of Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071 This report was prepared under Task Order J2380060103 (Cooperative Agreement #H1200040001) July 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. Natural Resource Reports are the designated medium for disseminating high priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This
    NPS Form 10-900 —. OMB No. 10024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determination for individual properti.es aTfa^IslftcTST6ee<iie^truction in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an Item does not apply to the property being documented, enter' N/A for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property__________________________________________ historic name East Longs Peak Trail: Longs Peak Trail: Keyhole Route: Shelf Trail________ other names/site number 5LR.11413: 5BL.10344___________________________ 2. Location_______________________________________________ street & number West of State Highway 7 (ROMO)______________ [N/A] not for publication city or town Allenspark_________________________________ [X] vicinity state Colorado___ code CO county Larimer; Boulder code 069: 013 zip code 3. State/Federal Agency Certification __ As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property [ ] meets [ ] does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (Elevation 8,640 Ft)
    1 NCSS Conference 2001 Field Tour -- Colorado Rocky Mountains Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:00 AM Depart Ft. Collins Marriott 8:30 Arrive Rocky Mountain National Park Lawn Lake Flood Interpretive Area (elevation 8,640 ft) 8:45 "Soil Survey of Rocky Mountain National Park" - Lee Neve, Soil Survey Project Leader, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:00 "Correlation and Classification of the Soils" - Thomas Hahn, Soil Data Quality Specialist, MLRA Office 6, Natural Resources Conservation Service 9:15-9:30 "Interpretive Story of the Lawn Lake Flood" - Rocky Mountain National Park Interpretive Staff, National Park Service 10:00 Depart 10:45 Arrive Alpine Visitors Center (elevation 11,796 ft) 11:00 "Research Needs in the National Parks" - Pete Biggam, Soil Scientist, National Park Service 11:05 "Pedology and Biogeochemistry Research in Rocky Mountain National Park" - Dr. Eugene Kelly, Colorado State University 11:25 - 11:40 "Soil Features and Geologic Processes in the Alpine Tundra"- Mike Petersen and Tim Wheeler, Soil Scientists, Natural Resources Conservation Service Box Lunch 12:30 PM Depart 1:00 Arrive Many Parks Curve Interpretive Area (elevation 9,620 ft.) View of Valleys and Glacial Moraines, Photo Opportunity 1:30 Depart 3:00 Arrive Bobcat Gulch Fire Area, Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 3:10 "Fire History and Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation Efforts" - Carl Chambers, U. S. Forest Service 3:40 "Involvement and Interaction With the Private Sector"- Todd Boldt; District Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service 4:10 "Current Research on the Fire" - Colorado State University 4:45 Depart 6:00 Arrive Ft. Collins Marriott 2 3 Navigator’s Narrative Tim Wheeler Between the Fall River Visitors Center and the Lawn Lake Alluvial Debris Fan: This Park, or open grassy area, is called Horseshoe Park and is the tail end of the Park’s largest valley glacier.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado 2-1-1 Get Connected. Get Answers
    Relief and Recovery Assistance Guide WELD COUNTY FLOOD September 2013 2-1-1 is a service of United Way of Weld County www.unitedway-weld.org/ Dial 2-1-1 or 1-800-559-5590 This version of the Relief and Recovery Guide was published on 10/16/2013. PURPOSE The purpose of this Relief and Recovery Guide is to connect Weld County residents affected by the 2013 Colorado Floods with disaster assistance and information. The Guide lists information on many programs and agencies in Weld County. Updates and verification are continuously being made to this document. Updates are available at www.UnitedWay-Weld.org/2013flood. The Guide is arranged in sections based on needs and the types of services provided. Where applicable, there are tables arranged to show resources available within the county and statewide. Phone numbers and specific information regarding service eligibility, hours, etc. may also be outlined. As this information is constantly changing, please contact services prior to deploying. You are welcome to dial 2-1-1, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for help in finding available disaster assistance services. Cell phone users call 970-353-8808, alternatively, call toll free 800-559-5590. Language translation services are available. Individuals with hearing and speech disabilities can call Relay Colorado at 7-1-1 (or 1-800-659-2656) to indirectly access Colorado 2-1-1. You can also visit www.211colorado.communityos.org to review resources and search the database of services in Weld County or your specific community. Colorado 2-1-1 will help identify the best local resources to fit your individual needs after a disaster or for life’s everyday situations.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Genetic Variation and Parasite Abundance in Bighorn Sheep from Rocky Mountain National Park
    Project Summary Rocky Mountains Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit Project Title: Monitoring Genetic Variation and Parasite Abundance in Bighorn Sheep from Rocky Mountain National Park Discipline: Natural Resources Type of Project: Research Funding Agency: National Park Service Other Partners/Cooperators: University of Montana Effective Dates: 6/30/2010 – 9/30/2012 Funding Amount: $20,083 Investigators and Agency Representative: NPS Contact: Mary Kay Watry, Rocky Mountain National Park, 1000 Highway 36, Estes Park, Colorado 80517, 970-586-1285, Mary [email protected] Investigator: Gordon Luikart, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Health Sciences Building, Room 105, Missoula, 59812; (406) 243-5503; [email protected] Project Abstract: The Mummy Range bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) population is among the most important wildlife populations in Rocky Mountain National Park. Because of the population’s small size (N < 100) there is concern that it may suffer from reduced genetic variation and inbreeding, which could reduce the probability of the herd’s persistence and its ability to adapt to future environmental change (e.g., disease challenges, parasites or other environmental stresses). This population has suffered disease-related die-offs in the past and could become increasingly susceptible to parasites if it suffers loss of genetic variation. Our recent study suggested that individual Mummy Range sheep with reduced genetic variation might have increased susceptibility to lung worm parasites (Luikart et al. 2008); however the study included only 30 individuals sampled in only one year (2005). Fortunately, the increasing availability of hypervariable DNA markers (microsatellites; Maudet et al. 2004) make it feasible to determine if a population has recently suffered a genetic bottleneck and inbreeding.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Colorado Regulations
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Water Quality Control Commission REGULATION NO. 94 COLORADO’S MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST 5 CCR 1002-94 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] 94.1 Authority These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq C.R.S. as amended, and in particular, 25-8-202 (1) (a), (b), (i), (2) and (6); 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 94.2 Purpose This regulation establishes Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List. This list identifies water bodies where there is reason to suspect water quality problems, but there is also uncertainty regarding one or more factors, such as the representative nature of the data. Water bodies that are impaired, but it is unclear whether the cause of impairment is attributable to pollutants as opposed to pollution, are also placed on the Monitoring and Evaluation List. 94.3 Water Bodies Identified for Monitoring and Evaluation WBID Segment Description Portion Parameter COAR Arkansas River Basin . COARFO03 Tributaries to Fountain Fourmile Creek, on USFS sediment Creek on USFS or AFA Land lands, Monument Creek to Arkansas River COARFO03 Tributaries to Fountain Bear Creek on USFS sediment Creek on USFS or AFA Land lands, Monument Creek to Arkansas River COARFO03 Tributaries to Fountain Cheyenne Creek, on sediment Creek on USFS or AFA USFS Land lands, Monument Creek to Arkansas River COARLA07 Purgatoire River, I-25 to all sediment Arkansas River COARLA09a Mainstem of Adobe Horse Creek Cu Creek and Gageby Creek… COARLA09c Rule Creek, Muddy Rule Creek Zn Creek, Caddoa Creek, Clay Creek, Cat Creek… COARLA11 John Martin Reservoir all Se COARMA04a Wildhorse Creek all NO 2 , NO 3 COARMA18 Boggs Creek all NO 2 , NO 3 , D.O.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Geology of Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado
    A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK COLORADO For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 15 cents A Guide to the Geology of ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK [ COLORADO ] By Carroll H. Wegemann Former Regional Geologist, National Park Service UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HAROLD L. ICKES, Secretary NATIONAL PARK SERVICE . NEWTON B. DRURY, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1944 Table of Contents PAGE INTRODUCTION in BASIC FACTS ON GEOLOGY 1 THE OLDEST ROCKS OF THE PARK 2 THE FIRST MOUNTAINS 3 The Destruction of the First Mountains 3 NATURE OF PALEOZOIC DEPOSITS INDICATES PRESENCE OF SECOND MOUNTAINS 4 THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 4 Time and Form of the Mountain Folding 5 Erosion Followed by Regional Uplift 5 Evidences of Intermittent Uplift 8 THE GREAT ICE AGE 10 Continental Glaciers 11 Valley Glaciers 11 POINTS OF INTEREST ALONG PARK ROADS 15 ROAD LOGS 18 Thompson River Entrance to Deer Ridge Junction 18 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Pass via Fall River .... 20 Fall River Pass to Poudre Lakes 23 Trail Ridge Road between Fall River Pass and Deer Ridge Junction 24 Deer Ridge Junction to Fall River Entrance via Horseshoe Park 29 Bear Lake Road 29 ILLUSTRATIONS LONGS PEAK FROM BEAR LAKE Front and back covers CHASM FALLS Inside back cover FIGURE PAGE 1. GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE iv 2. LONGS PEAK FROM THE EAST 3 3. PROFILE SECTION ACROSS THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS 5 4. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN ON TRAIL RIDGE 6 5. ANCIENT EROSIONAL PLAIN FROM FLATTOP MOUNTAIN ... 7 6. VIEW NORTHWEST FROM LONGS PEAK 8 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies for Stream Restoration
    Flood Potential in the Southern Rocky Mountains Region Steven Yochum, PhD, PE Big Thompson River & US-34 Hydrologist U.S. Forest Service National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center Fort Collins, Colorado Flood Potential in the Southern Rocky Mountains Region Collaborators: Drake, Colorado Julian A. Scott (Image source: NRCS exigent EWP) U.S. Forest Service National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center Fort Collins, Colorado David H. Levinson, PhD U.S. Forest Service National Stream and Aquatic Ecology Center Fort Collins, Colorado Overview of Problem • Common flood analysis procedures do not facilitate a number of needs, such as: • Verification of at-a-station flood-frequency and regional regression analyses results • Quantifiable procedure for identifying and ranking extreme floods • Clear comparisons of how flood magnitudes and hazards vary across regions • Simple language for communicating expected flood hazards with the public and land managers Estes Park, Colorado Potential Solution • A space-for-time substitution can be utilized to address these needs. Procedure: • Regressions of record peak discharges at long-term streamgages used to predict the expected flood potential (across zones of similar flood response) • Upper 90% prediction limit provides the maximum likely flood potential (floods greater than this limit defined as extreme) • Paleoflood data and shorter streamgage records can be utilized • Flood hazards can easily be compared between zones (using developed indices) • Seasonality and trend analyses can be performed (currently
    [Show full text]
  • Thin Grey Lines
    Thin Grey Lines: Confrontations With Risk on Colorado’s Front Range Robert Soden Leah Sprain Leysia Palen Department of Computer Science Department of Communication Department of Information Science University of Colorado Boulder University of Colorado Boulder University of Colorado Boulder [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT underneath the light pointillism used by mapmakers to This paper reports on two years of ethnographic observation portray area, outlines of buildings, streets, and of the science and politics of flood risk in Colorado, as well neighborhood parks appear: they fall within a Special Flood as design research that examines citizen interaction with Hazard Area, a designation of the Federal Emergency expert knowledge about flooding in the region. We argue Management Agency (FEMA), for places with a greater that the 100-year floodplain standard that inform maps than 1% annual chance of major flooding — this is the 100 produced by the United States Federal Emergency year floodplain. Management Agency (FEMA)'s National Floodplain Insurance Program (NFIP) represent a problematic form of The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (Figure 1), discursive closure of scientific understanding of flood described above, does work – the side of the line that one’s hazard. We show that in order to meet the requirements of house or neighborhood falls on has meaningful the NFIP, this standard acts as a closure that conveys a consequences. Those seeking to construct homes or certainty that the underlying science does not warrant and businesses within the 100-year floodplain are required to foreshortens dialogue on disaster risk and public obtain flood insurance and subject to various restrictions understanding of flood hazard.
    [Show full text]