Open Access http://jept.ir Publish Free doi 10.34172/jept.2020.36 Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Original Article Volume 7, Issue 1, 2021, 2020, p. 17-21 Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of bedside ultrasonography and radiography for calcaneal fractures in the emergency department Majid Zamani ID , Maliheh Mazaheri ID , Farhad Heydari* ID , Babak Masoumi ID Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Received: 1 June 2020 Abstract Accepted: 14 September 2020 Objective: Ultrasonography (US) is not the method of choice for the diagnosis of calcaneal Published online: 24 September fractures. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of US with plain 2020 radiography in the diagnosis of calcaneus fractures following blunt ankle and foot trauma. *Corresponding author: Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 214 patients (over 18 years) presenting to the Farhad heydari; Emergency emergency department (ED) with suspicion of traumatic calcaneus fracture following acute Medicine Specialist; Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty blunt trauma, were enrolled. Bedside ultrasonography was performed and interpreted by of Medicine, Isfahan University of emergency physicians. After that, plain radiography was performed. Furthermore, all the Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran patients were assessed by computed tomography (CT) scan as the gold standard. Alzahra Hospital, Sofeh Ave, Keshvari Results: Finally, 193 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 29.4 ± 15.7 years (85.5% Blvd., Isfahan, Iran. male). Fractures in the calcaneus were detected in 49 patients. The sensitivity and specificity Tel: +989131367643; Email:
[email protected] of ultrasonography in the detection of calcaneal fractures were 83.6%, (confidence interval (CI), 69.7 –92.2) and 100% (95% CI, 96.7 –100), while the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray Competing interests: None.