DOCSLIB.ORG

RIZ) (Formerly Known As the East Rockingham Industrial Park (IP14) Area) (Figure 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RIZ) (Formerly Known As the East Rockingham Industrial Park (IP14) Area) (Figure 1) RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION No. of Report File Name Report Date Prepared for: Initials copies Status 1 ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic V10 27 November LandCorp JH Environmental 2009 Asssessment_002-pvdm 1 ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic V10 27 November EPA JH Environmental 2009 Asssessment_002-pvdm 1 ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic V10 27 November Coffey Environments Pty JH Environmental 2009 Ltd Asssessment_002-pvdm Coffey Environments ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic Environmental Asssessment_002-pvdm-V10 27 November 2009 AN INVITATION TO COMMENT ON THIS STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) invites people to make a submission on this proposal. The environmental impact assessment process is designed to be transparent and accountable, and includes specific points for public involvement, including opportunities for public review of environmental review documents. In releasing this document for public comment, the EPA advises that no decisions have been made to allow this proposal to be implemented. LandCorp proposes development of the Rockingham Industry Zone (RIZ) (formerly known as the East Rockingham Industrial Park (IP14) area) (Figure 1). This proposal was referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) by the Western Australian Government through LandCorp requesting that the redevelopment of the nominated area be assessed as a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). The area of the RIZ being considered for assessment (Figure 5) contains ecological values that are of conservation significance. The EPA resolved to set the level of assessment for the project as a SEA (Assessment No. 1534) under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 . In accordance with the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), a Strategic Environmental Assessment has been prepared which describes this proposal and its likely effects on the environment. The SEA is available for a public review period of 12 weeks from 7 December 2009 closing on 2 March 2010. Comments from government agencies and from the public will help the EPA to prepare an assessment report in which it will make recommendations to government. Where to get copies of this document Printed and CD copies of this document may be obtained from Ben McCarthy at: LandCorp Level 3, Wesfarmers House 40 The Esplanade Perth 6000 WA Ph: 08 9482 7475 Fax: 08 9481 3315 Copies of the SEA will be available for $5 for a CD or $10 for the SEA main document (inc. postage) and $10 for a copy of the appendices (inc. postage). A summary document is available free of charge. The document/s may also be accessed through the proponent’s website at www.landcorp.com.au/rockinghamindustryzone I Coffey Environments ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic Environmental Asssessment_002-pvdm-V10 27 November 2009 Why write a submission? A submission is a way to provide information, express your opinion and put forward your suggested course of action - including any alternative approach. It is useful if you indicate any suggestions you have to improve the proposal. All submissions received by the EPA will be acknowledged. Electronic submissions will be acknowledged electronically. The proponent will be required to provide adequate responses to points raised in submissions. In preparing its assessment report for the Minister for the Environment, the EPA will consider the information in submissions, the proponent’s responses and other relevant information. Submissions will be treated as public documents unless provided and received in confidence, subject to the requirements of the Freedom of Information Act 1992 , and may be quoted in full or in part in each report. Why not join a group? If you prefer not to write your own comments, it may be worthwhile joining with a group or other groups interested in making a submission on similar issues. Joint submissions may help to reduce the workload for an individual or group, as well as increase the pool of ideas and information. If you form a small group (up to 10 people) please indicate all the names of the participants. If your group is larger, please indicate how many people your submission represents. Developing a submission You may agree or disagree with, or comment on, the general issues discussed in the SEA or the specific proposals. It helps if you give reasons for your conclusions, supported by relevant data. You may make an important contribution by suggesting ways to make the proposal environmentally more acceptable. When making comments on specific proposals in the SEA: • clearly state your point of view; • indicate the source of your information or argument if this is applicable; and • suggest recommendations, safeguards or alternatives. Points to keep in mind By keeping the following points in mind, you will make it easier for your submission to be analysed: • attempt to list points so that issues raised are clear. A summary of your submission is helpful; • refer each point to the appropriate section, chapter or recommendation in the SEA; • if you discuss different sections of the SEA, keep them distinct and separate, so there is no confusion as to which section you are considering; and • attach any factual information you may wish to provide and give details of the source. Make sure your information is accurate. II Coffey Environments ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic Environmental Asssessment_002-pvdm-V10 27 November 2009 Remember to include: • your name, • address, • date; and • whether you want your submission to be confidential. The closing date for submissions is: 2 March 2010. The EPA prefers submissions to be made electronically using one of the following: • the submission form on the EPA’s website: www.epa.wa.gov.au/submissions.asp ; • by email to [email protected] . Alternatively submissions can be: • posted to: Chairman, Environmental Protection Authority, Locked Bag 33, CLOISTERS SQUARE WA 6850, Attention: Shandell Raddock; or • delivered to the Environmental Protection Authority, Level 4, The Atrium, 168 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Attention: Shandell Raddock; or • faxed to (08) 6467 5562. If you have any questions on how to make a submission, please ring the EPA assessment officer, Shandell Raddock 6467 5497. III Coffey Environments ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic Environmental Asssessment_002-pvdm-V10 27 November 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strategic Environmental Assessment This Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) has been undertaken for 339 hectares (the SEA Area) within the Rockingham Industry Zone (RIZ), previously known as the Improvement Plan 14 (IP14) Area. The SEA Area of 339 hectares is part of a greater strategic Structure Plan for the RIZ that is zoned Industrial under the Metropolitan Region Scheme (MRS). The SEA Area excludes most of the land within the RIZ that is completely degraded and does not have any environmentally significant features. The SEA boundary also excludes areas that for various reasons are required to be developed urgently. These areas will be subject to separate environmental assessments. A strategic proposal can be a plan, program, or conceptual development that will lead to future specific proposals with likely environmental impacts. The objective of the RIZ SEA is to determine an appropriate development footprint in which future industry can be located. The SEA will also identify the parts of the SEA Area that have environmental values considered worthy of protection from future development and which need ongoing management. The SEA is seeking approval for development in the SEA Area which includes: • Clearing of vegetation in the Development Area; • Earthworks in the Development Area; • Installation of services in the Development Area; • Construction of roads in the Development Area; and • Construction of stormwater drainage infrastructure in the Development Area. When a future proposal is referred to the EPA, which is consistent with the outcomes of this strategic assessment, the EPA may declare that this proposal is a ‘derived proposal’. These are proposals that have been identified in the Structure Plan and do not have significant environmental issues that have not already been addressed in the SEA. Conditions from the strategic assessment, if any, could then be applied by the Minister for Environment to this ‘derived proposal’ and no further assessment by the EPA would be required. The desired objective of the SEA is to provide environmental approval for those activities and infrastructure associated with establishing future land uses in the development area and for them to be considered derived proposals. If the proposal raises other significant environmental issues not addressed in the SEA, then the proposal is deemed not to be a derived proposal and the EPA can formally assess the proposal separately on the basis of these additional issues. Any future development not considered a derived proposal may be subject to separate approvals under Part IV of the EP Act, 1986 or as a Works Approval under Part V of the EP Act, 1986 . RIZ Industrial Development The RIZ is located in the City of Rockingham approximately 40km south of the Perth Central Business District, adjacent to the Cockburn Sound coastal area. The RIZ consists of a total of 1160ha and has been developed progressively for many years however a significant area of land remains undeveloped. A Structure Plan prepared for the RIZ in 1999 proposed development over most of the RIZ and recommended retention of some areas in their natural state. These areas were considered to be buffers to surrounding land uses including the Leda Reserve to the east and residential areas to the south-west and the coastal area to the north-west. Since 1999, some environmental features of the RIZ IV Coffey Environments ENVIPERT00101AA_Strategic Environmental Asssessment_002-pvdm-V10 27 November 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY have increased in importance to such an extent that the 1999 Structure Plan was revised in 2008 to incorporate these features. The Proposed Structure Plan and this SEA proposes to retain an area of 78ha in the south-central part of the RIZ and expects that the remainder of the area assessed in the SEA will not be constrained for development by any of the terrestrial or biophysical environmental factors discussed in this report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Size Relationship of the Tympanic Bullae and Pinnae in Bandicoots and Bilbies (Marsupialia: Peramelemorphia)
    Size Relationship of the Tympanic Bullae and Pinnae in Bandicoots and Bilbies (Marsupialia: Peramelemorphia) by Melissa Taylor BSc This thesis is presented for the degree of Bachelor of Science Honours, School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, of Murdoch University Perth, Western Australia, 2019 Author’s Declaration I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not previously been submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. Melissa Taylor iii Abstract Hearing is an important factor allowing species to obtain information about their environment. Variation in tympanic bullae and external pinnae morphology has been linked with hearing sensitivity and sound localisation in different mammals. Bandicoots and bilbies (Order Peramelemorphia) typically occupy omnivorous niches across a range of habitats from open, arid deserts to dense, tropical forests in Australia and New Guinea. The morphology of tympanic bullae and pinnae varies between peramelemorphian taxa. Little is known about the relationship between these structures, or the extent to which they vary with respect to aspects of ecology, environment or behaviour. This thesis investigated the relationship between tympanic bulla and pinna size in 29 species of bandicoot and bilby. Measurements were taken from museum specimens to investigate this relationship using direct measuring methods and linear dimensions. It was hypothesised that an inverse relationship between bullae and pinnae may exist and that species residing in arid regions would have more extreme differences. Environmental variables were examined to determine the level of influence they had on bullae and pinnae. This study found that there was a phylogenetic correlation between the structures and that they were significantly influenced by temperature (max/average) and precipitation (average).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Living and Recently Extinct Bandicoots Based on Nuclear and Mitochondrial DNA Sequences ⇑ M
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 97–108 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogenetic relationships of living and recently extinct bandicoots based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences ⇑ M. Westerman a, , B.P. Kear a,b, K. Aplin c, R.W. Meredith d, C. Emerling d, M.S. Springer d a Genetics Department, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia b Palaeobiology Programme, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden c Australian National Wildlife Collection, CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia d Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA article info abstract Article history: Bandicoots (Peramelemorphia) are a major order of australidelphian marsupials, which despite a fossil Received 4 November 2010 record spanning at least the past 25 million years and a pandemic Australasian range, remain poorly Revised 6 September 2011 understood in terms of their evolutionary relationships. Many living peramelemorphians are critically Accepted 12 September 2011 endangered, making this group an important focus for biological and conservation research. To establish Available online 11 November 2011 a phylogenetic framework for the group, we compiled a concatenated alignment of nuclear and mito- chondrial DNA sequences, comprising representatives of most living and recently extinct species. Our Keywords: analysis confirmed the currently recognised deep split between Macrotis (Thylacomyidae), Chaeropus Marsupial (Chaeropodidae) and all other living bandicoots (Peramelidae). The mainly New Guinean rainforest per- Bandicoot Peramelemorphia amelids were returned as the sister clade of Australian dry-country species. The wholly New Guinean Per- Phylogeny oryctinae was sister to Echymiperinae.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Advice Isoodon Obesulus Obesulus Southern Brown
    THREATENED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Established under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 The Minister approved this conservation advice on 5 May 2016; and confirmed this subspecies 4 Apr 2001 inclusion in the Endangered category. Conservation Advice Isoodon obesulus obesulus southern brown bandicoot (eastern) Note: The information contained in this Conservation Advice was primarily sourced from ‘The Action Plan for Australian Mammals 2012’ (Woinarski et al., 2014). Any substantive additions obtained during the consultation on the draft are cited within the advice. Readers may note that Conservation Advices resulting from the Action Plan for Australian Mammals show minor differences in formatting relative to other Conservation Advices. These reflect the desire to efficiently prepare a large number of advices by adopting the presentation approach of the Action Plan for Australian Mammals, and do not reflect any difference in the evidence used to develop the recommendation. Taxonomy Paull (2008) recognised three subspecies of southern brown bandicoot in the south-eastern states: I. o. obesulus (New South Wales (NSW), Victoria and South Australia), I. o. nauticus (Nuyts Archipelago, South Australia) and I. o. affinus (Tasmania). Following Pope et al. (2001), Zenger et al. (2005) and Westerman et al. (2012), Woinarski et al. (2014) included I. o. affinis and I. o. nauticus as part of I. o. obesulus. This taxonomic grouping was accepted by the Australian Faunal Directory, and contributed to the re-evaluation of the status of I. o. obesulus undertaken here. However, recent genetic analysis suggests that I. o. affinis is genetically distinct from the mainland populations (Cooper et al., unpublished).
    [Show full text]
  • Isoodon Obesulus) in South Australia
    Conservation genetics of the endangered southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) in South Australia You Li Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of Adelaide August 2013 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. VI List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. VII Abstract ........................................................................................................................................VIII Declaration ....................................................................................................................................... X Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... XI Chapter One: Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Species decline and extinction in Australia .................................................................................... 2 Habitat loss and fragmentation ....................................................................................................... 2 Dispersal and habitat fragmentation .................................................................................... 2 Matrix in fragmented habitat ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Recovery Plan for the Southern Brown Bandicoot in the Mount Lofty Ranges
    Recovery Plan for the Southern Brown Bandicoot in the Mount Lofty Ranges, South Australia, 2004 to 2009 Prepared by Nerissa Haby and Kirstin Long JANUARY 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................................................I INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................................... I STATUS........................................................................................................................................................................... I THREATS AND THREATENING PROCESSES ....................................................................................................................... I RECOVERY PLAN OBJECTIVE........................................................................................................................................... I PRIMARY RECOVERY ACTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... I ESTIMATED COSTS OVER 5 YEAR PERIOD (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)........................................................................ II CONSERVATION STATUS..................................................................................................................................... 1 STAKEHOLDERS....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bandicoot Fact Sheet
    Southern Brown Bandicoot Common Name: Southern Brown Bandicoot F a c Scientific Name: Isoodon obesulus t S Description: The Southern Brown Bandicoot has brown fur h e with distinct golden streaks that cover most of its body. The fur e underneath is often dull white or cream colour. The bandicoot t is a small and quick marsupial that varies in size and weight. The adult males can grow up to 45 centimeters and adult females 41 centimeters. The average weight for males is around 850 grams and females are around 700 grams. Males Southern Brown Bandicoot Photo courtesy of N. Haby are almost always bigger and heavier than the females. Breeding: The availability of food, the temperature, rainfall and even the length of sunlight in a day can influence the number of young bandicoots a mother has each year. On average the female bandicoot will have around three young in each litter and between two and five litters per year. Unfortunately less than half of these young babies will make it to adult life. The most common time of year for breeding is between June and December. Bandicoot nest Photo courtesy of M. Turner Young bandicoot Photo courtesy of N. Haby Habitat: The bandicoot prefers areas that have a dense ground and shrub environment including the under-story in forests, wood- lands, scrub and heathlands and grasslands. The vegetation cover provides the bandicoot with protection from predators and ideal nesting sites. Nests are made into distinct mounds from the sur- rounding leaf litter and soil. Some nests have even been lo- cated in rabbit warrens.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Brown Bandicoots Can Be Successfully Returned to the Wild After Physiological Experiments
    Southern brown bandicoots can be successfully returned to the wild after physiological experiments. Christine E. Cooper Environment and Agriculture, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia. Running head: successful release of bandicoots *Corresponding Author: Dr. Christine Cooper, Environment & Agriculture, Curtin University, PO Box U1987 Perth Western Australia 6845 Phone: (08) 9266 7965 Fax: (08) 9266 2495 e-mail: [email protected] Keywords bandicoot, marsupial, movement, release, respirometry, survivorship 1 Abstract Context The poor survivorship of many animals released into the wild for translocation, re- introduction or rehabilitation may be cited as a reason not to release experimental animals, but there is only limited information available on the fate of ex-research animals returned to the wild. Aims This study tested the hypothesis that there was no difference in the recapture of bandicoots used for physiological experiments and control bandicoots. Methods Six adult male bandicoots were trapped and maintained in captivity for three weeks for physiological experiments, then released at the capture site. Sixteen other bandicoots were captured and released immediately. Seven weeks after the release of the bandicoots used for physiological studies, follow-up trapping was carried out, and the survival, body mass and distance moved of recaptured bandicoots was recorded. Key results Survivorship did not differ statistically for bandicoots used for physiological experiments and control bandicoots, with five of six experimental bandicoots (83 %) and 11 of 16 control bandicoots (69%) recaptured. Bandicoots used for physiological experiments lost a significantly greater proportion of body mass than control animals, but this occurred in captivity, not after release. The distance between recaptures for both groups (0-224m) was consistent with previously published observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Round Four Green Army Projects
    Approved Round Four Green Army projects Project Title Project Description State Project Host Service Provider Territory Partnering to Restore ACT and Region This project will build on the success of previous teams in engagement with local land carers and continue the land restoration activities targeting ACT Southern Act Conservation Threatened Ecosystems two fragmented threatened ecological communities in the ACT region. Under the collective guidance of three land management organisations with Catchment Group Volunteers extensive experience and accountabilities working with volunteers, and rural landowners, young adults will learn through hands on application, a Incorporated Australia diverse range of conservation skills to support the protection of threatened species, improve water quality, biodiversity, and habitat linkages. This project will leverage existing relationships to increase the number of work ready participants in our region whilst improving our local threatened ecological communities. Partnering to Restore ACT Threatened This project will build on the success of previous teams in engagement with local land carers and continue the land restoration activities targeting ACT Southern Act Conservation Ecosystems two fragmented threatened ecological communities in the ACT region. Under the collective guidance of three land management organisations with Catchment Group Volunteers extensive experience and accountabilities working with volunteers, and rural landowners, young adults will learn through hands on application, a Incorporated Australia diverse range of conservation skills to support the protection of threatened species, improve water quality, biodiversity, and habitat linkages. This project will leverage existing relationships to increase the number of work ready participants in our region whilst improving our local threatened ecological communities. Restoring Critically Endangered The ACT Region is a stronghold for the conservation of threatened Box-Gum Woodland and Natural Temperate Grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Environment and Planning Committee Inquiry Into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria
    LC EPC Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria Submission 449 Legislative Council Environment and Planning Committee Inquiry into Ecosystem Decline in Victoria Submission from Assoc Professor Barbara Wilson, Deakin University. The extent of decline of Victoria’s biodiversity has been of great concern to Victorians over many decades, particularly with regards to significant declines due to historic vegetation clearing, pest animals and weed invasion, river and marine declines. Weeds continue to have impacts over large areas of natural ecosystems e.g. Coast wattle and Pine invasions causing decline in ecosystem health in Brown Stringybark in western Victoria and impacts on food availability for endangered Black Cockatoos. Climate change impacts in Victorian ecosystems have only recently become more obvious and pervasive. In this submission I have taken the opportunity to focus on the extent of decline of Victoria’s biodiversity in the heathy woodland ecosystems of the eastern Otway ranges, and indicate opportunities to restore the environment. Decline in Heathy woodlands - Anglesea Heath, eastern Otway Ranges, Victoria The Anglesea Heath is recognised for its biodiversity, and a Land Management Cooperative Agreement was established to protect those values (Land Conservation Council Victoria 1985; McMahon and Brighton 2002). The Anglesea Heath (7141 ha) was leased for brown coal extraction over an area of 400 ha (1961–2015) and has recently been incorporated into the Great Otway National Park. The vegetation communities comprise a diverse mosaic of predominantly eucalypt forests, woodlands and heathlands, interspersed with dense wet shrublands. The rich mammal assemblage in the area consists of 15 small to medium-sized mammal species.
    [Show full text]
  • Isoodon Obesulus) in the SOUTH EAST of SOUTH AUSTRALIA: 1998 – 2016
    SURVEYS OF DIGGING ABUNDANCE OF THE SOUTHERN BROWN BANDICOOT (Isoodon obesulus) IN THE SOUTH EAST OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA: 1998 – 2016 Mark Bachmann and Andrea Fullagar June 2017 Report to the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. Surveys of Digging Abundance of the Southern Brown Bandicoot in the SE of SA: 1998-2016 Citation Bachmann, M. and Fullagar, A. (2017) Surveys of Digging Abundance of the Southern Brown Bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) in the South East of South Australia: 1998 – 2016. Report to Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia. Nature Glenelg Trust, Mount Gambier, South Australia. For correspondence in relation to this report please contact: Mr Mark Bachmann Principal Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust (08) 8797 8181 [email protected] Mr Bryan Haywood Senior Ecologist Nature Glenelg Trust (08) 8797 8596 [email protected] Cover photo Southern Brown Bandicoot digging in Lower Glenelg River Conservation Park, 2001 (Mark Bachmann). Disclaimer This report forms part of the Restoring Under-represented Ecological Communities project commissioned by the Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources. Although all efforts were made to ensure quality, it was based on the best information available at the time and no warranty express or implied is provided for any errors or omissions, nor in the event of its use for any other purposes or by any other parties. ii Surveys of Digging Abundance of the Southern Brown Bandicoot in the SE of SA: 1998-2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Restoring Under-represented Ecological Communities project was funded by the Australian Government’s Caring for our Country Program, through a regional allocation of grant funding to the South East Natural Resources Management Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Quenda Isoodon Obesulus (Shaw, 1797)
    Quenda Isoodon obesulus (Shaw, 1797) Description Coarse dark grey or yellow brown fur above and creamy-white below and a short, tapered, dark brown tail. The ears are short and rounded. The tail is lightly furred and often shortened or missing altogether, probably as a result of fighting. Other Common Names Southern Brown Bandicoot, Southern Short-nosed Bandicoot Isoodon obesulus fusciventer is known by the noongar name Quenda Distribution Widely distributed near the south west coast from Guilderton north of Size Perth to east of Esperance. Quenda have a patchy distribution Photo: Christine Groom/ DEC through the Jarrah and Karri forest, the Swan Coastal Plain, and Head and body length inland as far as Hyden. Quenda have been translocated to Julimar 300-360 (330) mm in males State Forest, Hills Forest near Mundaring, Tutanning Nature Reserve, Boyagin Nature Reserve, Dongolocking Nature Reserve, 280-330 (300) mm in females Leschenault Conservation Park, Karakamia Sanctuary, Paruna Sanctuary, Yalgorup National Park, Creery Wetlands, Avon Valley Tail length National Park, Nambung National Park, Francois Peron National 96-140 (124) mm in males Park and Thomson’s Lake Nature Reserve. 90-128 (113) mm in females For further information regarding the distribution of this species please refer to www.naturemap.dec.wa.gov.au Weight 500-1850 (890) g in males Habitat Scrubby, often swampy, vegetation with dense cover up to 1 m high, 400-1200 (620) g in females often feeds in adjacent forest and woodland that is burnt on a regular basis and in areas of pasture and cropland lying close to dense Subspecies cover.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Brown Bandicoot Isoodon Obesulus Obesulus
    Vulnerable Southern Brown Bandicoot Isoodon obesulus obesulus Southern Brown Bandicoots are medium-sized marsupials with long snouts, small rounded ears and large rumps. They are solitary animals that live for two to three years. Diet Southern Brown Bandicoots are omnivorous and forage for food under leaf litter and, in the soil, by digging distinctive cone-shaped Bioregion resources holes. They stay close to cover when they search for food and eat ants, insects and worms (both adults and larvae), fungi, fruits and other plant material. When vegetation becomes more mature and fully grown there may be fewer food resources available for the bandicoot, whereas after fire, there are abundant insects in the revegetation areas which provide food, and the new, diverse vegetation provides habitat. Therefore, in some habitats there is evidence that they prefer areas that are burnt from time to time. Breeding Breeding takes place from winter through to summer and females usually give birth from two to four young per litter. They can have several litters per breeding season, but less than half of their young survive to maturity. Habitat Southern Brown Bandicoots can be found in the Mount Lofty Ranges, Kangaroo Island and the South East of South Australia. This eastern subspecies is one of five subspecies of Southern Brown Bandicoot, two of which live in South Australia. The Southern Brown Bandicoot lives in dense scrubby habitats or areas with dense, low ground cover. They sleep in nests made of grass and other plant material that may be mixed with earth. These can be very well hidden in dense vegetation or among debris.
    [Show full text]