DOCSLIB.ORG

Trial by Space for a 'Radical Rural': Introducing Alternative Localities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trial by Space for a 'Radical Rural': Introducing Alternative Localities ARTICLE IN PRESS Journal of Rural Studies 23 (2007) 125–141 www.elsevier.com/locate/jrurstud Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives Keith Halfacree Department of Geography, University of Wales Swansea, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK Abstract This paper is concerned with bringing together and drawing out some diverse strands of thought and action that are striving—from within a broadly green anti-capitalist agenda—to produce a rural space that is different from and a challenge to the mainstream trajectories that the production of the rural is taking in the global North. First, I outline the main elements of a new model for thinking about rural space in general that tries to incorporate three different facets of ‘space’ that have been teased out through geographical scholarship. This draws inspiration from work by Henri Lefebvre. After demonstrating this model in respect of the post-1945 productivist rural, I introduce it to debates about the emerging contours of the post-productivist countryside. Drawing predominantly on British examples, the second half of the paper develops one element within the heterogeneous potentiality of this post-productivism to consider some key aspects of what I term an example of ‘radical’ rural spatiality. This examines its perceived localities, conceived formal representations and partially lived everyday lives. The final main section gives brief consideration to opportunities now being presented to this radical rurality but also notes the considerable challenges that lie ahead. r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Rural space; Rurality; Post-productivism; Green radicalism; Utopia; Theory 1. Introduction: getting to grips with rural change The structure of the paper is as follows. First, I introduce the model for thinking about rural space, one that tries to Throughout much of the global North today, challen- incorporate the different facets of ‘space’ so beloved of ging and critical questions are being asked with respect to theoretical geographical debate. Second, I operationalise how the ‘rural’ parts of these countries are developing and, this model in the context of debates about the changing perhaps still more importantly, should or could be spatiality of the British countryside. I develop one under- developing1. This reflects a strong feeling that rural change, researched and under-conceptualised element within the although something that has of course always been with us, heterogeneous post-productivist countryside by examining has intensified in terms of both pace and persistence, and a (potential) ‘radical’ rural spatiality. I then go on to that this change is also seen as being increasingly total and consider some of the opportunities and challenges facing interconnected (Woods, 2005). The key aim of this paper is any production of such a radical rurality in the present day. to use a recently developed model of rural space to This paper is set within a resurgence of interest in illuminate currents within this changing rurality that inject ‘utopian’ ideas within geography (e.g. Harvey, 2000), albeit a politically radical spatial challenge to the predominant that these have been strongly ‘urban’ to date (e.g. Baeten, scripting of the countryside that is emerging. 2002), perhaps partly reflecting a failure to appreciate the rural’s potentially radical ‘message’ (Halfacree, 2003a). Opening up the debate about our future rural(s) argues against teleology, inevitability, and unidirectional or E-mail address: [email protected]. 1Of course, the rural South is also in considerable transition but, singular models of socio-spatial change. Some element of without wishing to exaggerate a North-South dualism, the detailed our (rural) future is always there for the making. The paper changes here are in many ways quite different. also implicitly cautions against premature writing-off of 0743-0167/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.002 ARTICLE IN PRESS 126 K. Halfacree / Journal of Rural Studies 23 (2007) 125–141 the ‘rural’ as a relatively distinctive spatial category, not urban in his own life and work but his ideas can still be least at the level of everyday life, where it retains ‘an unruly used to re-interrogate the former. and intractable popular significance’ (Whatmore, 1993, Lefebvre’s model of space has, of course, been outlined p.605). and developed in numerous locations (e.g. Gregory, 1994; Merrifield, 1993, 2000, 2002; Shields, 1999). One of its core 2. A model for interrogating rural change elements is its attempt to transcend the dualism of conceived/abstract versus perceived/concrete to incorpo- The country is a foreign land. It shouldn’t be, yet it is rate its embodiment as lived (Elden, 2004, pp. 187–90); its (Perec, 1997 [1974], p. 68). entanglement with everyday life. I now consider each element in terms of my own understanding2. Critics may 2.1. A three-fold model of space feel that such use of Lefebvre’s ideas takes liberties but, as Merrifield (2000, p. 173) has observed, this is in many ways A few years ago, in a report on social exclusion, in the spirit of his own wide-ranging inquiries. It can also Shucksmith (2000, p. 6) observed how ‘Most people in be noted that my appropriation here is not atypical of Britain know little about rural areas beyond a purely visual Anglophone geographers’ interpretations of Lefebvre’s appreciation’. He went on to suggest reasons for this: ‘Seen work on space, such as Harvey (1987), Merrifield (1993) through a car window, or a TV screen, it is easy to see rural or even Soja (1996); cf. Elden (2001). areas as idyllic and changeless y [especially when we] First, there are spatial practices. These are the actions carry a picture of an imagined countryside where farming that ‘secrete’ a particular society’s space, facilitating both families till the same land as their forebears, where material expression and societal reproduction. Spatial everyone knows and supports one another in ‘commu- practices are inscribed routine activities and their expres- nities’, where life is slower and somehow better’ (p. 6). sion bears similarities with the concept of locality (Half- Moreover, this powerful representation of the rural is often acree, 1993). They are associated with how we perceive not challenged in the daily lives of many rural residents, ‘real’ (Elden, 2004, p.190) space. whose quotidian practices centre on working in the city and Second, there are representations of space. These formal for whom the rural is reduced to a ‘lifestyle’, the village a conceptions of space, as articulated by businesspeople, mere ‘dormitory’. We have what the radical French farmer planners, scientists and academics, refer to space as Jose´Bove´(quoted in Bove´and Dufour, 2001, p. 125) conceived or ‘imagined’ (Elden, 2004, p.190). They are disparages as a ‘cardboard-cutout countryside’. abstract and expressed through signs, plans, blueprints, Recognising the partiality of having such a perspective jargon, codes, etc. on the rural, whilst also acknowledging the central role of Third, there are spaces of representation. These diverse representations, daily lives and practices (all noted in the and often incoherent images and symbols are associated paragraph above), leads me to advocate the model of rural with space as directly lived—the spatial performance of space summarised below. This model is rooted in earlier everyday life. Although clearly linked to perceived and work (e.g. Halfacree, 1993) but now adds inspiration from conceived space—the ‘real-and-imagined’ (Elden, 2004, the late Henri Lefebvre (especially Lefebvre, 1991 [1947]). p.190)—spaces of representation refer to more symbolic Lefebvre was, of course, a social theorist (and much more) generations and appropriations by users into quotidian who recognised and promoted the importance of the meanings and local knowledges. Spaces of representation critical study of everyday life (e.g. Lefebvre, 1991 [1974]) can be subversive when they result in space being throughout his work (see appraisals in Elden, 2004; substantially (re)appropriated by marginal groups. Merrifield, 2000; Shields, 1999). One of Lefebvre’s most influential theorisations, at least to date in Anglophone interpretations (cf. Elden, 2004), is 2Lefebvre’s work has been very little used in Anglophone rural studies his seminal ‘conceptual triad’ for understanding space. This to date; as such, the introduction of his spatial conceptualisation here is, it is hoped, useful in its own right. This neglect is particularly notable given model attempted to bring together the diverse interpreta- Lefebvre’s early career as a rural sociologist (see Elden, 2004, Chapter 4; tions we have of space, which are all too often inadequately Unwin, 2000) and the inspiration he got from the rural throughout his life problematised (see Massey, 1992), into a unitary social (e.g. Merrifield, 2002; Lefebvre, 1991 [1947], pp. 131–132, Chapter 5). theory (Shields, 1999, Chapter 10). Although coming to Indeed, although Unwin (2000, p. 15) argued that Lefebvre ‘had very little fruition in a strongly urban context in the 1970s that to say about rural life’, some of his work on the rural is starting to come through in English translation (e.g. Lefebvre, 2003, pp. 111–120) and reflected, for example, the highly prominent, dynamic but appreciating this context helps us to understand more broadly how his contested character of urbanisation Lefebvre noted in ideas of space developed. (As one referee usefully noted, there is still very numerous works, the model can be applied to the rural if much at least a paper to be written on Lefebvre’s rurality.) One noted we see the latter as a category that can emerge—not as a exception to the neglect of Lefebvre in rural studies is Phillips’s (2002) dualistic ‘response’ to the urban (see Lefebvre, 1996, pp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the Culture Industry to the Society of the Spectacle: Critical Theory and the Situationist International
    FROM THE CULTURE INDUSTRY TO THE SOCIETY OF THE SPECTACLE: CRITICAL THEORY AND THE SITUATIONIST INTERNATIONAL Kevin Fox Gotham and Daniel A. Krier ABSTRACT Since Karl Marx fashioned his theory of capitalism in the nineteenth century, scholars have continually updated Marxian theory to capture the pervasiveness of commodity relations in modern society. Influenced by Georg Luka´cs and Henri Lefebvre, the members of the French avant- guard group, the Situationist International (1957–1972), developed an intransigent critique of consumer capitalism based on the concept of the spectacle. In the spectacle, media and consumer society replace lived experience, the passive gaze of images supplants active social participa- tion, and new forms of alienation induce social atomization at a more abstract level than in previous societies. We endeavor to make two theoretical contributions: First, we highlight the contributions of the Situationist International, pointing out how they revised the Marxian categories of alienation, commodification, and reification in order to analyze the dynamics of twentieth century capitalism and to give these No Social Science Without Critical Theory Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Volume 25, 155–192 Copyright r 2008 by Emerald Group Publishing Limited All rights of reproduction in any form reserved ISSN: 0278-1204/doi:10.1016/S0278-1204(08)00005-4 155 156 KEVIN FOX GOTHAM AND DANIEL A. KRIER concepts new explanatory power. Second, we build a critical theory of consumer capitalism that incorporates the theoretical assumptions and arguments of the Situationists and the Frankfurt School. Today, critical theory can make an important contribution to sociology by critically examining the plurality of spectacles and their reifying manifestations.
    [Show full text]
  • Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Music Streaming Spaces (Doi: 10.2383/82481)
    Il Mulino - Rivisteweb Robert Prey Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Music Streaming Spaces (doi: 10.2383/82481) Sociologica (ISSN 1971-8853) Fascicolo 3, settembre-dicembre 2015 Ente di afferenza: () Copyright c by Societ`aeditrice il Mulino, Bologna. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Per altre informazioni si veda https://www.rivisteweb.it Licenza d’uso L’articolo `emesso a disposizione dell’utente in licenza per uso esclusivamente privato e personale, senza scopo di lucro e senza fini direttamente o indirettamente commerciali. Salvo quanto espressamente previsto dalla licenza d’uso Rivisteweb, `efatto divieto di riprodurre, trasmettere, distribuire o altrimenti utilizzare l’articolo, per qualsiasi scopo o fine. Tutti i diritti sono riservati. Symposium / Other Senses of Place: Socio-Spatial Practices in the Contemporary Media Environment, edited by Federica Timeto Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Music Streaming Spaces by Robert Prey doi: 10.2383/82481 Human reasoning is innately spatial. [W]e are embodied, situated beings, who comprehend even disembodied commu- nications through the filter of embodied, situated experience [Cohen 2007, 213]. This appears to be why we constantly invoke place- and space-based metaphors to describe our online experiences. We visit a website; we join a virtual community in cyberspace, etc. However, to take the spatiality of “cyberspace” for granted is to forfeit any critical questioning of precisely how and why this network of networks has been spatialized. As Christian Schmid puts it, space ‘in itself’ can never serve as an epistemological starting position. Space does not exist ‘in itself’; it is produced [2008, 28]. This is where turning to the late French philosopher Henri Lefebvre becomes particularly useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Henri Lefebvre
    Understanding Henri Lefebvre Theory and the Possible Stuart Elden continuum LONDON • NEW YORK Continuum The Tower Building, 15 East 26th Street 11 York Road New York London SE1 7NX NY 10010 www.continuumbooks.com © Stuart Elden 2004 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN: 0-8264-7002-5 (HB) 0-8264-7003-3 (PB) Typeset by Refinecatch Ltd, Bungay Suffolk Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall Contents Acknowledgements v Introduction: Henri Lefebvre 1901-91 1 1 Rethinking Marxism 15 A new reading of Marx 15 The 'juvenile presumptions' of existentialism 19 Structuralism as the French ideology 22 Logic and dialectics 27 Applications of the dialectic 36 Alienation 39 Production 43 The Party and beyond 46 2 Engaging with philosophy 65 Beyond Marxism 65 The Philosophies group, Schelling and Hegel 67 Nietzsche against the fascists 73 Heidegger and the metaphysics of the Grand Guignol 76 Metaphilosophy 83 Descartes and literature 85 3 The critique of everyday life 110 A day in the life 111 A critique of the present 115 Festival and revolution 117 4 From the rural to the urban 127 The town and the country 129 A sack of potatoes 135 Reading rural spaces 13 7 The
    [Show full text]
  • Political Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre: Ideology and Utopia
    5/2012-13 Political Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre: Ideology and Utopia Grégory BUSQUET, UMR LAVUE (Mosaïques), Université Paris Ouest Nanterre The ideas of philosopher and sociologist Henri Lefebvre (1901-1991) are currently experiencing a revival in urban studies in France, while his theories on the city and urban society have been discussed and modified for many years in Anglophone social science literature. This new interest, which moreover extends to Europe, demonstrates however various uses of his philosophy: while some attempt to draw practical applications and to identify the influences of his theories on the practices of The Production of Space and on the usual uses of The Right to the City (Stanek, 2011), some philosophical or biographical exegeses ignore the concrete purpose of his reflections, namely, the socio-spatial processes of alienation, and occasionally at the same time turn up their noses at the setting in which they are expressed (social, political, urbanistic, etc.) and the conditions of their development. While some depoliticize his philosophy, giving it the currently popular slant (post-marxist) and emptying it of its subversive content and emancipating aim, as well as all references to conflict and the class struggle, others, conversely, especially abroad in the work of the supporters of Anglo-Saxon “radical geography”, take their inspiration from Lefebvre and do not allow their thoughts on space to be disassociated from an analysis of class or an analysis in terms of politics1. This article would be in alignment with the latter perspective, resituating Lefebvre’s thought on space and all its criticism, theoretical and practical alike, at the heart of that which in our opinion makes it unique, namely, it’s relationship with the political.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Jamming
    Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank Vincent de Jong for introducing me to the intricacy of the easyCity action, and for taking the time to answer my questions along my exploration of the case. I also want to thank Robin van t’ Haar for his surprising, and unique, contribution to my investigations of the easyCity action. Rozalinda Borcila, the insights you have shared with me have been a crucial reminder of my own privilieged position – your reflections, I hope, also became a marker in what I have written. Also, I would like to thank others that somehow made my fieldwork possible, and influenced my ‘learning’ of activism and culture jamming. Of these I would especially like to thank Nina Haukeland for introducing me to the politics of activism, Kirsti Hyldmo for reminding me of the realities of exploitation, Åse Brandvold for a skilled introduction to the thoughts and tools of culture jamming, and Maria Astrup for showing me the pleasures and powers of aesthetics. Also, I would like to thank the Norwegian Adbusters Network, and the editorial groups of Vreng. To my main advisor Professor Kristian Stokke, I would like to thank you for the excellent support you have given me throughout my master studies. Your insights have been of grate value, and I cannot thank you enough for continually challenging me. Also, the feedback from Olve Krange, my second advisor, was crucial at the early stage of developing the thesis, to defining its object of inquiry, and finally when writing my conclusion. I would also like to express my appreciation to Professor Oddrun Sæther for an excellent introduction to the field of cultural studies, to Professor Matt Sparke at the University of Washington for demonstrating the intriguing complexities of political geography, and to PhD candidate Stephen Young, for proof reading and fruitful inputs at the final stage of writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities Within the City: Doityourself Urbanism and the Right to the City
    bs_bs_banner Volume 37.3 May 2013 941–56 International Journal of Urban and Regional Research DOI:10.1111/1468-2427.12053 Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City KURT IVESON Abstract In many cities around the world we are presently witnessing the growth of, and interest in, a range of micro-spatial urban practices that are reshaping urban spaces. These practices include actions such as: guerrilla and community gardening; housing and retail cooperatives; flash mobbing and other shock tactics; social economies and bartering schemes; ‘empty spaces’ movements to occupy abandoned buildings for a range of purposes; subcultural practices like graffiti/street art, skateboarding and parkour; and more. This article asks: to what extent do such practices constitute a new form of urban politics that might give birth to a more just and democratic city? In answering this question, the article considers these so-called ‘do-it-yourself urbanisms’ from the perspective of the ‘right to the city’. After critically assessing that concept, the article argues that in order for do-it-yourself urbanist practices to generate a wider politics of the city through the appropriation of urban space, they also need to assert new forms of authority in the city based on the equality of urban inhabitants. This claim is illustrated through an analysis of the do-it-yourself practices of Sydney-based activist collective BUGA UP and the New York and Madrid Street Advertising Takeovers. Introduction In many cities around the world we are presently witnessing the growth of, and interest in, a range of micro-spatial urban practices that are reshaping urban spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • …”The City Is an Oeuvre, Closer to a Work of Art Than to a Simple Material Product.” Henri Lefebvre
    …”the city is an oeuvre, closer to a work of art than to a simple material product.” Henri Lefebvre Connotations of ephemeral spaces of consumption: a case study in Singapore’s Little India Adriana Gonzalez Brun Little India Little India 1880s and 1980s SoHo or Theme park? Ephemeral spaces of consumption Ephemeral spaces of consumption Ephemeral spaces of consumption Fragments within a fragment Ephemeral events that punctuate the official urban master plan. The product of complex contestations and creative tactics. Composed by in between fragments. Campbell Lane Along Serangoon Road Street astrologer Thank you Bibliography and image credits Baudrillard, J. (2003) The consumer society: Myths and structures (London: Sage Publications) Bermann, M (1982), All that is solid melts into air (New York: Penguin books) Borden, I., Kerr, J., Pivaro, A. and Rendell, J. (eds) (1996) The unknown city ( London:Routledge) Chang, L. (2000) ‘Singapore’s Little India: A Tourist Attraction as a Contested Landscape’, Urban Studies, Vol.37, n.2 Chua, B.‐H. (2003) Life is not complete without shopping (Singapore: NUS Press) Clarke, D. (2010)“The seduction of space” in M. Goodman, D. Goodman and M. Redclift (eds) Consuming Spaces: Placing Consumption in Perspective (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company) Debord, G. (1994) The society of Spectacle (New York: Zone Books) De‐Certeau M. (1988) The Practice of Everyday Life (Berkeley: University California Press) Foucault, M. (1986) ‘Of Other Spaces’, Diacritics, 24(22) Hardt, M and Negri A. (2009) Commonwealth (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press) Kellner, D. ‘Jean Baudrillard and Art’, http://gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/baudrillardandart.pdf .(accessed 12 July 2012) Kong, L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again
    The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again Chris O’Kane John Jay, CUNY [email protected] There has been a renewed engagement with the idea of real abstraction in recent years. Scholars associated with the New Reading of Marx, such as Moishe Postone, Chris Arthur, Michael Heinrich, Patrick Murray, Riccardo Bellofiore and others,1 have employed the idea in their important reconstructions of Marx’s critique of political economy. Alberto Toscano, Endnotes, Jason W. Moore and others have utilized and extended these theorizations to concieve of race, gender, and nature as real abstractions. Both the New Reading and these new theories of real abstraction have provided invaluable work; the former in systematizing Marx’s inconsistent and unfinished theory of value as a theory of the abstract social domination of capital accumulation and reproduction; the latter in supplementing such a theory. Yet their exclusive focus on real abstraction in relation to the critique of political economy means that the critical marxian theories of real abstraction -- developed by Alfred Sohn- Rethel, Theodor W. Adorno and Henri Lefebvre -- have been mostly bypassed by the latter and have largely served as the object of trenchant criticism for their insufficient grasp of Marx’s theory of value by the former. Consequently these new readings and new theories of real abstraction elide important aspects of Sohn-Rethel, Adorno and Lefebvre’s critiques of real abstraction; which sought to develop Marx’s critique of political economy into objective-subjective critical theories of the reproduction of capitalist society.2 However, two recent works by 1 Moishe Postone’s interpretation of real abstraction will be discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Henri Lefebvre Published by the University of Minnesota Press
    HENR LEFEBVRE TOWARD AN ARCH TECTURE OF ENJOYMENT Edited by l:.ukasz Stanek I Translated by Robert Bononno TOWARD AN ARCHITECTURE OF ENJOYMENT Also by Henri Lefebvre Published by the University of Minnesota Press The Urban Revolution Translated by Robert Bononno Foreword by Neil Smith Dialectical Materialism Translated by John Sturrock Foreword by Stefan Kipfer State, Space, World: Selected Essays Edited by Neil Brenner and Stuart Elden Translated by Gerald Moore, Neil Brenner, and Stuart Elden Also on Henri Lefebvre Published by the University of Minnesota Press Henri Lefebvre on Space: Architecture, Urban Research, and the Production of Theory Łukasz Stanek TOWARD AN ARCHITECTURE OF ENJOYMENT Henri Lefebvre EDITED BY ŁUKASZ STANEK TRANSLATED BY ROBERT BONONNO University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis • London This book was supported by a grant from the Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts. English translation copyright 2014 by Robert Bononno Introduction copyright 2014 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Published by the University of Minnesota Press 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 290 Minneapolis, MN 55401– 2520 http://www.upress.umn.edu Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lefebvre, Henri, –, author. [Vers une architecture de la jouissance. English] Toward an architecture of enjoyment / Henri Lefebvre; edited by Lukasz Stanek; translated by Robert Bononno. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN ---- (hc) ISBN ---- (pb) .
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture, Space and Ideology: Between Adorno and Lefebvre
    S A J _ 2018 _ 10 _ admission date 01 12 2017 review article approval date 01 04 2018 UDC 72.01 14 Адорно Т. 14 Лефевр А. COBISS.SR-ID 271269644 ARCHITECTURE, SPACE AND IDEOLOGY: BETWEEN ADORNO AND LEFEBVRE A B S T R A C T Can architecture become a site of resistance to the machinery of estrangement and alienation? The German philosopher Theodor Adorno found art, where he included specific forms of architecture, to be the only exit from the dominance of machinery of the total system. If architecture in Adorno’s philosophy could, with its negative position, step behind the screens into an autonomous art, the French philosopher and sociologist, Henri Lefebvre, developed a more radical notion: the distinctive scenery of architecture, everyday life, is intensely subjected to alienation. As much as Lefebvre puts focus on abstract and social space as a specific production of social relations, he also argued that every architecture is a priori ideological. Introducing the status architecture was given by Adorno and Lefebvre in the age of the birth of neoliberalism, thus paralleling the concepts of cultural industries with arts, social with abstract space, the paper outlines the basic entry point of two distinctive representatives of Neo-Marxism into architecture, in order to suggest an epistemology of architecture, which starts at a foremost critical point. Mateja Kurir 37 Centre for Advanced Studies, University of Rijeka KEY WORDS [email protected] ARCHITECTURE CRITICAL THEORY THEODOR ADORNO HENRI LEFEBVRE IDEOLOGY S A J _ 2018 _ 10 _ ARCHITECTURE, SPACE AND IDEOLOGY: ARCHITECTURE WITHIN CRITICAL THEORY: BETWEEN ADORNO AND LEFEBVRE WITH OR WITHOUT IDEOLOGY Architecture mainly finds its place in philosophy as an ideological power.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Peter Bratsis 410 West End Avenue, #5D New York, New York 10024 212-799-3623 [email protected] CURRENT POSITION: Assistant Professor of Political Science (2012-present) Department of Social Sciences Borough of Manhattan Community College, City University of New York EDUCATION: Ph.D. City University of New York, Political Science, 2002 Dissertation: Everyday Life and the State: A Materialist Revision of State Theory Committee: Stanley Aronowitz, John Bowman, David Harvey, Irving Leonard Markovitz and Frances Fox Piven B.A. University of Maryland, Political Science and Economics, 1991 PUBLICATIONS: Books 2006 Everyday Life and the State, Paradigm Publishers. Reviewed in: Cultural Sociology; Constellations; Historical Materialism. a. Spanish translation, forthcoming, Prometeo Libros. 2002 Paradigm Lost: State Theory Reconsidered (edited with Stanley Aronowitz), University of Minnesota Press. Reviewed in: Radical Society; Global Social Policy; Canadian Journal of Political Science; Review of Radical Political Economics; TheGlobalSite. a. Chinese translation, 2008, Jilin People’s Press. Refereed Journal Articles forthcoming “Political Corruption in the Age of Transational Capitalism: From the Relative Autonomy of the State to the White Man’s Burden,” Historical Materialism. a. Spanish translation, forthcoming, Revista Herramienta forthcoming, “Post-Political Sovereignty: Between Markets and Animals,” Critical Sociology. 2010 “Legitimation Crisis and the Greek Explosion,” International Journal for Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 34.1, 190-196. 2010 “Manifesto For A Left Turn: An Aristotelian-Marxist Critique,” Situations, Vol. 3 #2, 91-99. 2010 “The Greek Crisis - Politics, Economics, Ethics: A Debate” (with Etienne Balibar, Kevin Featherstone, Stathis Kouvelakis and Costas Lapavitsas), Journal of Modern Greek Studies, Vol. 28.2, 293-310. Peter Bratsis 2005 “Situations Manifesto” (with Stanley Aronowitz), Situations, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Debord: from Spectacle to Simulacrum Celso Frederico 1
    Debord: from spectacle to simulacrum Celso Frederico 1 Abstract Debord’s theory about the spectacle was conceived as a critique of the split between image and reality and also as a critique of mediacentrism. Its theoretical roots lie in the experience of aesthetic vanguards, in the theory of reification of G. Lukacs and to the reflections of H. Lefébvre on everyday life. Later, postmodernism appropriated Debord’s legacy to develop, in a different theoretical register, the theory of the simulacrum. Keywords: spectacle, image, reification, artistic communication crisis, simulacrum The term society of the spectacle , title of Debord's most important work, had been widely publicized in the media, and it went so far as to diverge completely from the strict sense that the author attributed to it. It met, thus, the fate of other famous expressions such as democracy as a universal value and ideas out of place , which have been abusively used, almost like advertising slogans, and have won distant senses and often contrary to the original intentions of their creators. Debord's case is even serious: what was a sharp critique to capitalist society and to the domination of image came to be understood - implicitly - as an apology of spectacularization promoted by mass media. It is therefore necessary to recover the ideas effectively defended by the author and to the context in which they were born. One part of the best productions on communication studies was created from reflections on the crisis of culture and art. Authors as R. Williams, U. Eco, T. Adorno, F. Jameson, P. Bordieu and many others are situated in this common field.
    [Show full text]