Peace and Democracy at the Crossroads: 14 Peacebuilding Dilemmas After Civil War
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Peace and democracy at the crossroads: 14 peacebuilding dilemmas after civil war A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law, Education, Business and Arts (LEBA) School of Creative Arts and Humanities Charles Darwin University Izabela da Costa Pereira Watts January 2019 This page intentionally left blank Declaration This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying online via the University’s Open Access repository eSpace. Izabela da Costa Pereira Watts January 2019 This page intentionally left blank Abstract When a civil war ends, what are the main dilemmas involved in seeking to mutually achieve “peace, democracy, and a functional state”? And, what role do UN operations play in bringing simultaneously peace and democracy to post-civil war countries? After 30 years since the end of the Cold War, something seems wrong with the “democratic peacebuilding” agenda. The political transition to civil democratic peace is often conflict-ridden. Despite an unprecedented number of UN interventional operations “to enforce peace and build democracy”, rarely can war-torn countries make a transition to both peace and democracy. Either they are trapped in an endless cycle of conflict or achieve stability only through nondemocratic rule. Contrary to the common belief that peace and democracy go hand in hand after a civil war, this research explores how they are at a crossroads. It proposes an innovative set of 14 dynamic dilemmas with respective trade-offs called the Philosophical – Actors – Tactical (P-A-T) platform of democratic peacebuilding dilemmas. It focuses on understanding the contradictions in post-conflict recovery, the challenges facing interim governments and the role of the international community when transitioning from internal armed conflict towards political, legal, civil and social orders from 1989 to 2018. The conceptual framework of transitional dilemmas is used to analyze a set of 12 issues commonly found during transition times: elections and political parties; the constitution, checks and balances and power sharing; transitional justice: human rights and amnesty, truth commissions and ad hoc war crime tribunals; disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration (DDR) & SSR; media reform and civil society. Solving one dilemma leads to at least one or more other dilemmas that shape a complex apparatus for the restoration of peace and the installation of a new political regime. This research contributes theoretically by advancing the paradoxes already identified by the literature (temporal, systemic, horizontal and vertical) with an additional ten dilemmas: central, existential, design, moral, operational, resource, security, sequencing, financial and, transparency. Understanding this systematic set of dilemmas may provide the key to guiding disrupted states through the difficult process of transition after conflict. With a new procedural approach, it also helps to explain why UN missions sometimes bring some peace but rarely a functional democracy to civil war-torn countries; it claims that often a moderate level of each is achieved. Civil wars represent contemporary challenges, not only to a state’s stability and legitimacy, but also to regional and international order and security. So that they often become “global civil wars”. The transition is invested by hybrid forms of peace, along with hybrid forms of political structures and processes, imposed via a top-down approach by international actors. Beyond understanding the causes and consequences of civil wars, more research is required to foresee the challenges after civil war on the path towards sustainable democratic peace, state-building, and perhaps, even nation-building. Therefore, this research addresses the contemporaneous paradoxes interrelated to civil war, fragile states, peacebuilding, democratization, state-building and the United Nations. With the objective to avoid failed states, the research proposes a tool for better decision-taking through awareness of probable dilemmas that are faced in any post-civil war situation. v Acknowledgments Whether by coincidence or not, the scope of this research shares the same acronym as Charles Darwin University (CDU): it is all about Conflict, Democracy and the United Nations! I dedicate this research to those who are the main characters: the past and future generations of modern civil wars. To choose a political topic that involves so much despair and unfairness requires the strong equilibrium to maintain research objectivity and a methodological structure for years without ever losing the vision of what it is all about: humanity. Having been a peacekeeper myself with the ability to speak different languages certainly added a different layer of comprehension to the proposed field of knowledge. This was particularly effective when analyzing the cases of Angola, Timor-Leste, Mozambique, Haiti, Côte d' Ivoire and DRC. With the large literature on democratization, peacebuilding and state-building, this researcher does not pretend to have discovered a miracle truth that somehow eluded all predecessors. There is no magic formula for success. Nonetheless, pulling together the strands of the various theories, practices, and case analyses, the study provides interesting insights into the contradictions of building peace, democracy, and a strong state as simultaneous goals in the aftermath of civil war. I have never been alone. I owe a debt of gratitude to Professor Wayne Cristaudo, my principal “super-supervisor”, who guided me throughout the entire journey with excellence. Not only has he provided academic insights but, most of all, he gave me respect, support and opportunities without ever doubting my capacities. In the same way, Dr. Joakim Kreutz was a great supervisor who assisted with substantive methodological understanding as well as with supporting the incredible opportunity for me to be a visitor scholar at the prestigious Department of Peace and Conflict Research of the Uppsala University in Sweden. This experience also gave me the chance to interview key academic experts on civil war transitions whose comments were fundamental to achieving this research. I also thank Anna Jarstad and the contributing authors of the book From War to Democracy: Dilemmas of Peacebuilding (2008) whose work inspired this research. My deepest thankfulness is also expressed to all those who contributed with special insights during field trips in Kosovo and Serbia and interviews in the United States, Ireland and Northern Ireland. Special thanks go to all senior current and former UN officials of DPKO, DPA, UNMIK, UNMIT, MINUSTAH, and MINUCA, and members of the Presidency and the Parliament of Kosovo and the Presidency of the Philippines. I am also grateful to the former President of Timor-Leste and Nobel Peace Laureate José Ramos-Horta, for his contributions. Furthermore, gratefulness must also be given to CDU staff in the Darwin and Sydney campuses who provided absolutely all the necessary support for this higher degree research to be completed. I owe everything to my family, particularly my mother Marli, who echoes perseverance, elegance and moral principles without comparison. I also dedicate this to my sister Gleice and my father Jonas, who suddenly passed away during this research journey. To my friends all over the world; my deepest gratitude. Last, but definitely not least, my husband Anthony Watts deserves to co-share the title of Doctor of Philosophy due to his unquestionable intellectual, financial, and emotional support when I most needed. Meu amor, eu te amo mais e mais! I must vi also confess that I did not foresee the experience of undergoing and surviving cancer surgery and later being blessed with my first pregnancy, which certainly added to the challenging journey. And then another miracle brought even more happiness with a second pregnancy as I submit my thesis. Far from any naivety, motherhood made the space to widen my intellectual horizons and understanding from a perspective that I never thought would be possible. My babies Daniel and Julia have shown me the obvious: freedom and safety, also commonly known as “peace”, should not be a privilege of the few. And that is precisely what keeps me passionate to continue in the turbulent areas of humanitarian affairs, good governance and political affairs, international development cooperation and peacebuilding. vii Publications Some extracts of this doctoral research have been published. • Pereira Watts, Izabela (2016). From war to peace: when democracy prevails? Saint Louis University Public Law Review. Vol. XXXV/2 ISSN: 0898-8404 (Includes extracts of chapters 1, 6 and 7) • Pereira Watts, Izabela (2017). Beyond the Rhetoric on Gender and Peacekeeping: Victims of war, freedom fighters and wonder women in blue helmets? UA: Ukraine Analytica. Vol 1. Issue 7. ISSN 2518-7481 • Pereira Watts, Izabela (2016), 'The Role of Independent Volunteers in Humanitarian Crises', E- International Relations, Jun 29 2016. ISSN 2053-8626 Available at http://www.e-ir.info/2016/06/29/the-role-of-independent-volunteers-in-humanitarian- crises/ (Includes extracts from chapter