DOCSLIB.ORG

Between Modern and Postmodern: Nietzsche on Truth and Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Between Modern and Postmodern: Nietzsche on Truth and Knowledge NIETZSCHE ON TRUTH AND KNOWLEDGE BETWEEN MODERN AND POSTMODERN: NIETZSCHE ON TRUTH AND KNOWLEDGE By KARL W. L. LADEROUTE, B.A. (HONS.), M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright by Karl W. L. Laderoute, August 2013 McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2013) (Philosophy) TITLE: Between Modern and Postmodern: Nietzsche on Truth and Knowledge AUTHOR: Karl W. L. Laderoute, B.A.(Hons.), M.A. (Wilfrid Laurier University) SUPERVISOR: Professor Barry Allen NUMBER OF PAGES: viii, 178 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines Nietzsche’s epistemology. Its main interlocutors are two previously existing attempts to explain Nietzsche’s views on truth and knowledge. One of these interpretations I dub the ‘postmodern’ reading, held most notably by Sarah Kofman, Jacques Derrida, and Paul de Man. The other is the ‘modern’ reading of Walter Kaufmann, John T. Wilcox, and most prominently Maudemarie Clark and Brian Leiter. Each of these readings emphasizes one aspect of Nietzsche’s thought. The postmodern reading focuses on Nietzsche’s more radical pronouncements, and promotes a type of scepticism and subjectivism. The modern reading, by contrast, emphasizes Nietzsche’s more traditional claims, and argues that he lauds science and preserves our ability to attain truth. However, neither reading is entirely satisfactory. In what follows, I first critically examine both of these readings in detail. The first chapter highlights the major points of these two readings, as well as some issues in each. After detailing these positions, I then turn to a largely chronological reading of Nietzsche’s works to establish an alternative account of his epistemology. Chapters two through four provide readings of Nietzsche’s epistemological claims in his major works from Human, All Too Human (1878) until Twilight of the Idols (1888). I combine this chronological reading with other informative aspects of Nietzsche’s thought. These other aspects include Nietzsche’s reading of Roger Boscovich (1711-1787) and his adoption of force-point ontology, his ontological commitment to nominalism, his views on evolution and its role in epistemology, and his similarities with Ernst Mach (1838-1916). Finally, I also connect Nietzsche’s epistemology with his critiques of morality and religion. I show that my reading is buttressed by the deep congruity between Nietzsche’s epistemology and his critiques, while the modern and postmodern readings are both unable to account for this congruity in a satisfactory manner. iii To Ruthann iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are a great many people whose love and support have contributed to the writing of this thesis. I would like to extend my hearty thanks to my supervisor, Dr. Barry Allen. His rigorous and penetrating comments and questions pushed me to rethink my position on a number of occasions, as well as clarify my thoughts. This thesis would not be what it is without him. I would also like to thank the other members of my committee. Dr. Stefan Sciaraffa asked some excellent questions which helped me further clarify issues, as well as gave support along the way. Dr. Brigitte Sassen also provided helpful comments, and a wonderful year teaching together. Dr. Sam Ajzenstat also deserves special mention. Although he was unable to finish this thesis officially, his probing questions and brilliant style have deeply impacted my own thinking. Over the course of many lunches he helped shape this project into what it has become. I would also like to extend my thanks to all the members of McMaster’s philosophy department. They have all been friendly, welcoming, and a wonderful influence. Special thanks also go to Kim Squissato, Daphne Kilgour, and Rabia Awan, whose assistance in navigating the university administration has been invaluable. I would also like to thank the many students at McMaster who have contributed to my thinking and personal life, particularly Josh Zaslow. Thanks also go to the Ontario Graduate Scholarship for funding this project. A great many people outside of McMaster have been instrumental as well. First and foremost I would like to thank my wife Ruthann. Her love and support kept my spirits high throughout the writing of this thesis. She also provided excellent editorial suggestions and was a great sounding board for ideas. I would also like to acknowledge a deep gratitude to my parents, Carrol and Joan. They have long encouraged me to pursue my dreams and are a continuing source of comfort and support. Thanks also go to my second family, Michael and Andrea in particular. I also thank a great many friends whose company and intelligence have been most welcome over the years. Finally, I thank Yoda for being a constant source of entertainment and for keeping things in perspective. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter One: Setting the Scene: Secondary Readings 6 of Nietzsche’s Epistemology Chapter Two: Nietzsche’s Developing Epistemology 36 Chapter Three: Evolution, Force Points, and 75 Perspectivism: Nietzsche’s Gay Science and Alternative Epistemology Chapter Four: Nietzsche’s Mature Epistemology 121 Chapter Five: The Compatibility of Nietzsche’s 145 Epistemological Views with his Moral and Religious Critiques Conclusion 165 Bibliography 172 vi Abbreviations Nietzsche’s collected works (in German): KSA – Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe KGW – Nietzsche Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe KGB – Nietzsche Briefwechsel: Kritische Gesamtausgabe Nietzsche’s works (in English translation): A – The Antichrist AOM – Assorted Opinions and Maxims BGE – Beyond Good and Evil BT – The Birth of Tragedy out of the Spirit of Music CW – The Case of Wagner D – Daybreak, Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality EH – Ecce Homo GS – The Gay Science GM – On the Genealogy of Morals HH – Human, All Too Human NCW – Nietzsche contra Wagner TI – Twilight of the Idols TL – “On Truth and Lies in a Non-Moral Sense” (referenced by page number) UH – On the Uses and Disadvantages of History for Life WP – The Will to Power Z – Thus Spoke Zarathustra Nietzsche’s works are referenced by section number, unless otherwise noted. Certain works (TI, EH, NCW) first give an abbreviated section title followed by the relevant section number (e.g. EH, ‘Books’ BT 1). On the Genealogy of Morals first provides the essay number, followed by the relevant section number (e.g. GM, I, 12) vii DECLARATION OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT This thesis first provides a critical overview of two different interpretations of Nietzsche’s epistemology. It then develops an alternative reading which utilizes the best aspects of both of these interpretations. The reading of Nietzsche’s epistemology developed in this thesis is also connected to his critiques of morality and religion. Connecting these two aspects of Nietzsche’s thought brings both into clearer focus. The two alternative accounts of Nietzsche’s epistemology surveyed cannot adequately explain this connection, while my account is buttressed by it. viii Ph.D. Thesis – Karl W. L. Laderoute; McMaster University – Philosophy Introduction: Nietzsche on Truth and Knowledge The philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche has been a long-standing source of interpretive controversy. Due to his aphoristic writing style, and the wide range of topics his works engage with, it has proved difficult to precisely determine Nietzsche’s stance on many issues. His thought touches upon topics as varied as the ancient Greeks, figures in the history of philosophy, art, music, medicine, evolution, morality, religion, language, the nature of thought, and epistemology. Arguably his views on truth and knowledge are the most important of these topics. After all, if it turns out that Nietzsche is a sceptic, who rejects any notion of truth, and holds that no claim is more justified than any other, then the rest of his views will be mere subjective preferences, which should elicit no evaluative scrutiny from his readers. On such a sceptical view, Nietzsche’s works should be relegated to the field of literature rather than philosophy, and his claims viewed as rhetorical attempts to elicit responses in his readers rather than as a series of truth- apt propositions. Such a view may be not entirely inappropriate for Nietzsche. His major fictional enterprise, Thus Spoke Zarathustra (1883-1885), is amenable to this view. However, we are forced to consider whether all of Nietzsche’s works fit such a paradigm. Throughout his works, Nietzsche consistently engages in a practice of making assertions and attempting to convey information to his readers. In particular, his critiques of morality and religion appear to take the form of arguments. As Nietzsche claims in Daybreak (1881), “I deny morality as I deny alchemy, that is, I deny their premises.”1 Passages such as these surely sound argumentative, and so it is tempting to take Nietzsche’s claims seriously. But when we attempt to interpret Nietzsche as a traditional philosopher providing arguments for his readers, we are again faced with passages which lend themselves to the sceptical reading, such as his claim that “all of our consciousness refers to errors!”2 This thesis is an attempt to make sense of Nietzsche’s epistemological views. It provides a more satisfactory reading of his views on truth and knowledge than have been provided by two alternative groups. The first is what I label the ‘postmodern’ reading of Nietzsche. This reading embraces the sceptical side of Nietzsche’s thought, and as a result largely ignores any claims that appear factual in his texts. In response to this sceptical reading, a largely Anglo- American ‘modern’ reading has arisen. This reading embraces the evaluative side of Nietzsche’s thought and attempts to make sense of the sceptical passages in a way that allows him to make the factual claims that he does. A prominent, but by no means undisputed, modern reading has come from Maudemarie Clark. She has provided a developmental reading of Nietzsche that sees his scepticism rooted in a form of Kantianism, which she holds permeates his early and middle works.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Abstract the Shelter of Philosophy
    ABSTRACT THE SHELTER OF PHILOSOPHY: REPRESSION AND CONFRONTATION OF THE TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE IN THE WORKS OF SARAH KOFMAN by Ashlee M. Cummings Sarah Kofman, philosopher and survivor of the Holocaust, contributed to the treatment of the traumatic narrative as something to be feared and suppressed, yet she also broke from this tradition with the writing of her autobiography, Rue Ordener, rue Labat, which detailed the horrors she suffered during the German occupation of France and the aftermath of her father’s death in Auschwitz. This thesis aims to show that while her autobiography was a drastic separation from her previous writings, in which she denies any such telling of a traumatic story is necessary, all of Kofman’s final texts that were written immediately preceding her suicide express a certain urgency with regard to her personal history. This project considers how Kofman treated her autobiography, from paradoxically hiding and showcasing it, to her claims that it didn’t exist outside of her bibliography. THE SHELTER OF PHILOSOPHY: REPRESSION AND CONFRONTATION OF THE TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE IN THE WORKS OF SARAH KOFMAN A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of French and Italian by Ashlee M. Cummings Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2009 Advisor: _____________________________ Dr. James Creech Reader: ______________________________ Dr. Elisabeth Hodges Reader: ______________________________ Dr. Sven-Erik Rose Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Aestheticism
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 Nietzsche and Aestheticism Brian Leiter Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian Leiter, "Nietzsche and Aestheticism," 30 Journal of the History of Philosophy 275 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Notes and Discussions Nietzsche and Aestheticism 1o Alexander Nehamas's Nietzsche: L~fe as Literature' has enjoyed an enthusiastic reception since its publication in 1985 . Reviewed in a wide array of scholarly journals and even in the popular press, the book has won praise nearly everywhere and has already earned for Nehamas--at least in the intellectual community at large--the reputation as the preeminent American Nietzsche scholar. At least two features of the book may help explain this phenomenon. First, Nehamas's Nietzsche is an imaginative synthesis of several important currents in recent Nietzsche commentary, reflecting the influence of writers like Jacques Der- rida, Sarah Kofman, Paul De Man, and Richard Rorty. These authors figure, often by name, throughout Nehamas's book; and it is perhaps Nehamas's most important achievement to have offered a reading of Nietzsche that incorporates the insights of these writers while surpassing them all in the philosophical ingenuity with which this style of interpreting Nietzsche is developed. The high profile that many of these thinkers now enjoy on the intellectual landscape accounts in part for the reception accorded the "Nietzsche" they so deeply influenced.
    [Show full text]
  • Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James Magrini College of Dupage, [email protected]
    College of DuPage [email protected]. Philosophy Scholarship Philosophy 7-1-2012 Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James Magrini College of DuPage, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub Part of the Education Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Magrini, James, "Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education" (2012). Philosophy Scholarship. Paper 30. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at [email protected].. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Scholarship by an authorized administrator of [email protected].. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James M. Magrini Existentialism, and specifically phenomenology, in qualitative educational research, tends to be misunderstood. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is that scholars/researchers writing in the field often emulate and imitate the dense writing styles of philosophical forerunners in phenomenology such as Hegel, Brentano, Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Thus the writing is beyond the comprehension of many education professionals and practitioners. Existentialism and phenomenology need not be highly complex. Here I provide a summary of existentialism and phenomenology in accessible terms so that educators might see the potential this type of philosophy holds for enhancing our educational endeavors. 1. Existentialism is a modern philosophy emerging (existence-philosophy) from the 19th century, inspired by such thinkers as Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Unlike traditional philosophy, which focuses on “objective” instances of truth, existentialism is concerned with the subjective, or personal, aspects of existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Descartes' Influence in Shaping the Modern World-View
    R ené Descartes (1596-1650) is generally regarded as the “father of modern philosophy.” He stands as one of the most important figures in Western intellectual history. His work in mathematics and his writings on science proved to be foundational for further development in these fields. Our understanding of “scientific method” can be traced back to the work of Francis Bacon and to Descartes’ Discourse on Method. His groundbreaking approach to philosophy in his Meditations on First Philosophy determine the course of subsequent philosophy. The very problems with which much of modern philosophy has been primarily concerned arise only as a consequence of Descartes’thought. Descartes’ philosophy must be understood in the context of his times. The Medieval world was in the process of disintegration. The authoritarianism that had dominated the Medieval period was called into question by the rise of the Protestant revolt and advances in the development of science. Martin Luther’s emphasis that salvation was a matter of “faith” and not “works” undermined papal authority in asserting that each individual has a channel to God. The Copernican revolution undermined the authority of the Catholic Church in directly contradicting the established church doctrine of a geocentric universe. The rise of the sciences directly challenged the Church and seemed to put science and religion in opposition. A mathematician and scientist as well as a devout Catholic, Descartes was concerned primarily with establishing certain foundations for science and philosophy, and yet also with bridging the gap between the “new science” and religion. Descartes’ Influence in Shaping the Modern World-View 1) Descartes’ disbelief in authoritarianism: Descartes’ belief that all individuals possess the “natural light of reason,” the belief that each individual has the capacity for the discovery of truth, undermined Roman Catholic authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • “Modern” Philosophy: Introduction
    “Modern” Philosophy: Introduction [from Debates in Modern Philosophy by Stewart Duncan and Antonia LoLordo (Routledge, 2013)] This course discusses the views of various European of his contemporaries (e.g. Thomas Hobbes) did see philosophers of the seventeenth century. Along with themselves as engaged in a new project in philosophy the thinkers of the eighteenth century, they are con- and the sciences, which somehow contained a new sidered “modern” philosophers. That might not seem way of explaining how the world worked. So, what terribly modern. René Descartes was writing in the was this new project? And what, if anything, did all 1630s and 1640s, and Immanuel Kant died in 1804. these modern philosophers have in common? By many standards, that was a long time ago. So, why is the work of Descartes, Kant, and their contempor- Two themes emerge when you read what Des- aries called modern philosophy? cartes and Hobbes say about their new philosophies. First, they think that earlier philosophers, particu- In one way this question has a trivial answer. larly so-called Scholastic Aristotelians—medieval “Modern” is being used here to describe a period of European philosophers who were influenced by time, and to contrast it with other periods of time. So, Aristotle—were mistaken about many issues, and modern philosophy is not the philosophy of today as that the new, modern way is better. (They say nicer contrasted with the philosophy of the 2020s or even things about Aristotle himself, and about some other the 1950s. Rather it’s the philosophy of the 1600s previous philosophers.) This view was shared by and onwards, as opposed to ancient and medieval many modern philosophers, but not all of them.
    [Show full text]
  • SPINOZA's ETHICS: FREEDOM and DETERMINISM by Alfredo Lucero
    SPINOZA’S ETHICS: FREEDOM AND DETERMINISM by Alfredo Lucero-Montaño 1. What remains alive of a philosopher's thought are the realities that concern him, the problems that he addresses, as well as the questions that he poses. The breath and depth of a philosopher's thought is what continues to excite and incite today. However, his answers are limited to his time and circumstances, and these are subject to the historical evolution of thought, yet his principal commitments are based on the problems and questions with which he is concerned. And this is what resounds of a philosopher's thought, which we can theoretically and practically adopt and adapt. Spinoza is immersed in a time of reforms, and he is a revolutionary and a reformer himself. The reforming trend in modern philosophy is expressed in an eminent way by Descartes' philosophy. Descartes, the great restorer of science and metaphysics, had left unfinished the task of a new foundation of ethics. Spinoza was thus faced with this enterprise. But he couldn't carry it out without the conviction of the importance of the ethical problems or that ethics is involved in a fundamental aspect of existence: the moral destiny of man. Spinoza's Ethics[1] is based on a theory of man or, more precisely, on an ontology of man. Ethics is, for him, ontology. He does not approach the problems of morality — the nature of good and evil, why and wherefore of human life — if it is not on the basis of a conception of man's being-in-itself, to wit, that the moral existence of man can only be explained by its own condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche's Comparative Religion: an Analysis of the Anti-Christ
    Nietzsche's Comparative Religion: An Analysis of The Anti-Christ t. I Gary Wilson Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The University of Cape Town 1994 University of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town i f f I I SUMMARY OF TIIESIS ! r ' This thesis explores the argument that Nietzsche's aim in his book The Anti-Christ is to reveal what he regards as the truth about Christianity, and that he uses detailed comparisons to prove this. Many forms of comparison are used by Nietzsche in The Anti-Christ. One is the comparison between Christianity and other religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, and Islam. Another is the comparison between different forms or even levels of Christianity. And yet another is the comparison between Christianity, science, and Buddhism, based on their degree of contact with reality. As these comparisons are traced in this thesis, a number of contradictions are encountered, and it would appear that these are due to Nietzsche's attempt to address two groups of readers - Christi~ readers, and those readers who are prepared for Nietzsche's radical philosophy. The contradictions arise when Nietzsche tries to i.' please both groups of readers, to be both blunt and sophisticated at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrice Bougon
    Revue électronique internationale www.sens-public.org Sartre, Sarah Kofman et Jacques Derrida La déconstruction et son héritage PATRICE BOUGON Résumé : Jacques Derrida et Sarah Kofman ont hérité de Jean Paul Sartre, mais la pratique de la déconstruction a mis en question la démarche du fondateur des Temps Modernes, notamment en ce qui concerne la relation entre la philosophie et la littérature. Il est intéressant d 'analyser comment, après avoir écrit une bonne partie de leurs œuvres, ces deux philosophes ont pris la peine de remarquer les traces de l'oeuvre de Sartre dans leur autobiographie intellectuelle. L'héritage est pour une part de l'ordre de l'inconnu. La temporalité du sujet lecteur, la dette, le rapport entre théorie et autobiographie, le rapport au suicide (S.K.) sont aussi ici analysés. Contact : [email protected] Sartre, Sarah Kofman et Jacques Derrida La déconstruction et son héritage1 Patrice Bougon2 A la mémoire de S.K. « On ne peut pas souhaiter un héritier ou une héritière qui n'invente pas l'héritage, qui ne le porte pas ailleurs, dans la fidélité. Une fidélité infidèle. On retrouve cette double injonction qui ne me quitte pas. »3 Jacques Derrida n guise d'introduction pour situer mon propos dans le cadre de ce colloque « Que faire de Sartre ? » et plus précisément de cette session Sartre philosophe, deux Eremarques préliminaires s'imposent. Une double chance nous est offerte par ces mots donnés que nous lèguent les organisateurs. Il nous faut donc hériter de cette question dont la simplicité n'est qu'apparente : Que faire de Sartre ? Que nous donne à penser Sartre par cet héritage ? La déconstruction hérite de Sartre, mais réciproquement, comme l'indique le double génitif de mon sous-titre, le texte de Sartre hérite aussi de l'apport de cette démarche philosophique sur laquelle je reviendrai.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOSOPHY 27 Early Modern Philosophy in This Course We Will
    PHILOSOPHY 27 Early Modern Philosophy Michael Epperson CSUS Office: Mendocino Hall # 3036 Fall 2010 Telephone: 278-4535 T & TH 10:30 – 11:45, Amador 152 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: By Appointment Description In this course we will examine the ways in which the scientific and political innovations of 16th, 17th, and 18th century Europe both influenced and were influenced by the rationalist and empiricist philosophical traditions that competed and flourished during this period. We will study the works of several philosophers working within these two traditions as they struggled to make sense of the scientific and social revolutions sweeping through their world; and we will see how their work would, in turn, help shape these revolutions, even as they continue to evolve today. One focus of the course, then, will be to examine the ways in which these philosophical traditions have maintained their relevance and influence in our own millennium as 21st century science struggles with its most difficult questions yet. Our survey will entail a careful reading and critique of the metaphysical and epistemological schemes developed by key philosophers of the early modern period, beginning with the work of Bacon, Galileo, and Descartes and concluding with Kant and his revolutionary synthesis of the rationalist and empiricist worldviews. The course website can be found at: www.csus.edu/cpns/epperson. Requirements Our work will primarily be lecture and discussion, so both careful attention to the readings and class participation will be crucial for a lively course. Please bring your text to class. There will be two examinations--one take-home mid-term paper and one in-class final--as well as several homework assignments and unannounced short answer quizzes on the readings.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Philosophy
    An Introduction to Philosophy W. Russ Payne Bellevue College Copyright (cc by nc 4.0) 2015 W. Russ Payne Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document with attribution under the terms of Creative Commons: Attribution Noncommercial 4.0 International or any later version of this license. A copy of the license is found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 1 Contents Introduction ………………………………………………. 3 Chapter 1: What Philosophy Is ………………………….. 5 Chapter 2: How to do Philosophy ………………….……. 11 Chapter 3: Ancient Philosophy ………………….………. 23 Chapter 4: Rationalism ………….………………….……. 38 Chapter 5: Empiricism …………………………………… 50 Chapter 6: Philosophy of Science ………………….…..… 58 Chapter 7: Philosophy of Mind …………………….……. 72 Chapter 8: Love and Happiness …………………….……. 79 Chapter 9: Meta Ethics …………………………………… 94 Chapter 10: Right Action ……………………...…………. 108 Chapter 11: Social Justice …………………………...…… 120 2 Introduction The goal of this text is to present philosophy to newcomers as a living discipline with historical roots. While a few early chapters are historically organized, my goal in the historical chapters is to trace a developmental progression of thought that introduces basic philosophical methods and frames issues that remain relevant today. Later chapters are topically organized. These include philosophy of science and philosophy of mind, areas where philosophy has shown dramatic recent progress. This text concludes with four chapters on ethics, broadly construed. I cover traditional theories of right action in the third of these. Students are first invited first to think about what is good for themselves and their relationships in a chapter of love and happiness. Next a few meta-ethical issues are considered; namely, whether they are moral truths and if so what makes them so.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Kofman: Effecting Self Translation Christie Mcdonald
    Document généré le 23 sept. 2021 09:18 TTR Traduction, terminologie, re?daction Sarah Kofman: Effecting Self Translation Christie McDonald Psychanalyse et traduction : voies de traverse Résumé de l'article Psychoanalysis and Translation: Passages Between and Beyond Sarah Kofman : la traduction de soi en effets — Dans le travail de Sarah Volume 11, numéro 2, 2e semestre 1998 Kofman, un déplacement s'opère de la philosophie et de la psychanalyse vers « l'écriture de vie » qui effectue une traduction que ni l'une ni l'autre ne URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/037340ar peuvent contenir. Traduire dans ce sens remonte aux sources des lectures DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/037340ar philosophiques, psychanalytiques et linguistiques de Kofman pour en changer les contours. Lisant Nietzsche à travers Freud, et Freud à travers Nietzsche, Sarah Kofman déploie des ressources puissantes d'analyse dont émerge une Aller au sommaire du numéro écriture personnelle dans Rue Ordener, rue Labat. Il y va du destin de la femme, de cette philosophe-écrivaine, et du rapport entre des systèmes de pensée et la vie. Éditeur(s) Association canadienne de traductologie ISSN 0835-8443 (imprimé) 1708-2188 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article McDonald, C. (1998). Sarah Kofman: Effecting Self Translation. TTR, 11(2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.7202/037340ar Tous droits réservés © TTR: traduction, terminologie, rédaction — Les auteurs, Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des 1998 services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne.
    [Show full text]
  • En Stanset Vandrer Nietzsche-Temaer I Knut Hamsuns Mysterier Pål Roar Brekke
    En stanset vandrer Nietzsche-temaer i Knut Hamsuns Mysterier Pål Roar Brekke Masteroppgave i idéhistorie Det humanistiske fakultet Institutt for filosofi, ide- og kunsthistorie og klassiske språk Veiledet av Espen Schaanning Universitetet i Oslo Vår 2012 ii Pål Roar Brekke En stanset vandrer Nietzsche-temaer i Knut Hamsuns Mysterier Masteroppgave i idéhistorie Universitetet i Oslo Vår 2012 iii © Pål Roar Brekke 2012 En stanset vandrer: Nietzsche-temaer i Knut Hamsuns Mysterier Pål Roar Brekke http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo iv SAMMENDRAG I denne oppgaven undersøker jeg hvilken betyding et knippe Nietzsche-temaer kan ha hatt for Knut Hamsuns bok Mysterier. I perioden når Hamsun skrev Mysterier begynte Nietzsche å bli ett hett samtaleemne i Norden. Mange kjente intellektuelle fra de nordiske landene kommenterte, fortolket og presenterte Nietzsches ideer. Noen utdrag og oversettelser fra Nietzsches bøker ble også publisert i tidskrifter og aviser. I oppgaven undersøker jeg slike oversatte utdrag, samt sekundære tekster, for å finne fram til aktuelle temaer. På den måten forsøker jeg å presisere hvilken rolle temaene kan spille i Mysterier. Aktuelle sekundære tekster som analyseres i oppgaven er alle fra forfattere som forskere har satt i sammenheng med Hamsun. Disse forfatterne er Georg Brandes, Ola Hansson, Arne Garborg og August Strindberg. Det vises i oppgaven at Hamsun-forskere flest gjerne hevder at de eventuelle Nietzsche-temaene som finnes i Mysterier har kommet fra en eller flere av disse fire. Jeg argumenterer for at et oversatt utdrag i et velkjent tidsskrift i samtiden også kan ha hatt en stor betydning for Mysteriers plott og tematikk.
    [Show full text]