Bryozoarios Marinhos Brasileiros-II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bryozoarios Marinhos Brasileiros-II Bryozoarios Marinhos Brasileiros-II- por Ernst Marcus (Departamento de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo) Recebido para publicação a 1-III-38. (Com 29 Estampas: 1-XX1X) A. Parte especial. Pag. I. O material e a sua proveniencia .. 3 II. Entoprocta . 5 III. Ectoprocta, Cheilostomata .. 11 IV. Ectoprocta, Ctenostomata .. ... 51 V. Notas zoogeographicas ................................. ... .. .. 60 B. Parte geral. VI. Gemmação normal e reguladora ...................... 66 VII. Polymorphismo em Hippothoidae . .... 74 VIII. Observações embryologicas ... .... 79 1. Seminação e alimentação do ovo .................. .. .. 80 2. Clivagem e formação dos folhetos germinativos .. .. 93 3. Organogénesis da larva e larvas viventes ... 99 4. Conclusões............. 111 C. Summary .. ................................................................. .. 116 D. Bibliographia . .. ................................. ......................... 124 E. Registro dos nomes dos generos e das especies . 135 F. Estampas...................................................................... ................ 138 A. Parte especial i. O material e a sua proveniencia. Conjunctamente com a minha esposa Exma. Sra. D. E v e l i n e í)U Bois-Reymond M arcus, continuei a estudar os Bryozoarios ma­ rinhos brasileiros, nomeadamente da bahía de Santos. Penhora- ram-nos e por terem colleccionado material interessante, as Senhoras D. Rosina de Barros, D. Margarida Kaufmann e D. Gertrudes Siegel e os Senhores R. L. Araujo, Dr. K. Arens, Barão Dr. O. de Fiore, Dr. O. da Fonseca, Dr. F. Rawitscher, Dr. H. Stettiner e Dr. P.. Tibiriçá. A todos elles havemos de agradecer o inte­ resse que tomaram por nosso trabalho. Ao meu amigo e muito prezado collaborador no Departamento de Zoologia, profes­ sor de Physiologia comparativa, Dr. Paulo Sawaya, devemos a parte essencial do material no qual se baseam as pesquisas do ca­ pitulo geral do trabalho presente. Agradeço além d’isso a elle e ao Snr. Michel Pedro Sawaya, licenciado em sciencias naturaes e professor de Zoologia no Collegio Universitario, por se terem en­ carregado da revisão lingüistica do meu manuscripto e da revisão das provas respectivamente. Cumpre-me, outrosim, agradecer de maneira especial aos Senhores directores do Clube de Pesca de Santos, os quaes sempre facilitaram de modo excepcional as pes­ quisas do Departamento de Zoologia na bahia de Santos. Em virtude da distribuição quasi nunca restrictamente locali- sada dos Bryozoarios marinhos, será evitada a enumeração das es­ pecies encontradas em Itanhaen, ca. de 50 km. ao sul de Santos se já tiverem sido anteriormente (Marcus, 1937) mencionadas entre as de Santos. Da bahia de Guanabara, porém, tal lista po­ derá conduzir a comparações zoogeographicas futuras. D’alli o Snr. Prof. Dr. Olympio da Fonseca nos mandou, graças á amabili- dade do meu prezado collega Dr. Flavio da Fonseca, as especies seguintes. PccIícbIIwiGs c c t t i u c v (Pall.), Cotiopgutyi T G t i o u l o j w i Scrupocellaria cornígera (Pourt.), (L) porella pungens (Can. & Bassl.), Watersipom cucullata (Bsk ) Zoobotryon pellucidum Ehrbg. O material inteiro á nossa disposição provem do litoral su­ perior. Quanto á bahia de Santos, evidentemente não estamos muito longe de conhecer a sua bryozoofauna da agua rasa, por se repetirem as especies nas varias collecções feitas ahi. Eliminada Eucratea loricata (L.) por razões expostas anteriormente (Marcus 1937, p. 32) e não contadas as variedades nos casos onde a espe­ cie typica figura nas nossas listas, o inventario das especies deno­ minadas, até agora verificadas na bahia de Santos entre 0 e 20 m. de profundidade, importa em 95. Sem duvida é um resultado agradavel em comparação com as 81 especies conhecidas da região de Woods Hole, intensamente pesquisada em todas as profundi­ dades entre 0 e 36 m. Mas, para igualar o numero de 15Q espe­ cies dos mares dinamarquezes, nem mesmo todos favoraveis para Bryozoarios por causa da salobridade do sudeste e dos fundos are­ nosos e limosos no oeste, precisamos explorar profundidades maio­ res. Para muitas especies a região continuamente batida até pelas ondas minimas e mais superficiaes não se acha habitavel; teremos de dragar estes elementos de profundidades de 20 metros para baixo. Do litoral do Rio de Janeiro temos tido na mão até agora 12 especies. Se deixarmos de lado as indicações da literatura, mais ou menos dignas de confiança quanto á exactidão do lugar de pro­ veniencia, torna-se claro que se precisa esperar augmento do ma­ terial, antes de confrontar zoogeographicamente as duas bryozoo- faunas. Tres das mencionadas 12 especies da bahia de Guana­ bara ainda não conhecemos da bahia de Santos, a saber: Scrupo- cellaria cornígera (Pourt.), Bowerbankia caudata (Hcks.) e Bus- kia socialis Hincks. Lista das especies tratadas. Entoprocta: 1 — Pedicellina cernua (P all.) 2 — Barentsia gracilis (M. S ars) 3 — Barentsia laxa Kirkp. Ectoprocta: C heilostomata A ñ a s c a : 4 — Aetea tnmcata (L andsb.) 5 — Conopeum reticulum (L.) 6 — Conopeum commensale Kirkp. & Metz. 7 — Electra ha&tingsae, nom nov. 8 — Crassimargifiatella leucocypha M arc. 9 — Steganoporella buskii H arm . 10 — Thalamoporqlla gothica (Bsk.) var. prom inens Lev. 11 — Scrupocellaria bertholletn (A ud.) 12 — Synnotum aegyptiacum (A ud.) 13 — Bugula flabella+a (J. V. Thomps.) 14 — Caulibugula armata (V err.) 15 — Membraniporella aragoi (A ud.) C heilostomata A s c o p h o r a : 16 — Catenicella contei (Aud.) 1 7 — Euteleia evelinae, gen. nov., spec. nov. 18 — Trypostega venusta (Norm.) 19 — Pasythea tulipifera (Ell. Sol.) 20 — Escharoides costifera (Osb.) 21 — Schizoporella horsti (Osb.) 22 — Hippodiplosia otto-mülleriana (Moll) var. parva, var. nov. 23 — Hippodiplosia pertusa (E sp.) 24 — Smittina trispinosa (Johnst.) var. m um ta (H cks.) 25 —. S m ittin a-species 26 —· Watersipora cucullata (Bsk.) 27 — Cellepora dichotomy Hcks. 28 — Siniopelta diota, spec. nov. C t e n o s t o m a t a : 29 — Arachnidium fibrosum Hcks. 30 — Nolella sawayai, spec. nov. 31 — Nolella dilatata (Hcks.) 32 — Nolella alta (Kirkp·.) 3 3 — Bowerbankia gracilis Leidy 34 — Mimosella vertidllata (Hell.) var. firm ata, var. nov. 3 5 — Buskia nitens Alder II. Bryozoa Ehrenberg 1831. I.a subclasse Entoprocta Nitsche 1869 *) Pedicellina cernua (Pall.) (Est. I Fig. 1). Pedicellina echinata Nitsche 1869, p. 13-31 t. 2,3. Pedicellina cernua Hincks 1880, p. 565 f. 36 & 39 t. 81 1. l-o. Pedicellina echinata Harmer 1887, p. 239 t. 21 t. 22 f. 16. Pedicellina cernua Levinsen 1894, p. 96 t. 9 f. 18-29. Pedicellina echinata Robertson 1900, p. 344. Pedicellina cernua Osburn 1912, p. 213 t. 18 f. 3. Pedicellina cernua Osburn 1914, p. 184. Pedicellina cernua Waters 1918, p. 43 (synonymia). Pedicellina cernua Kramp· 1918, p. 318. Pedicellina cernua Robertson 1921, p. 63. Pedicellina cernua Marcus 1921b, p. 118, fig. 11. Pedicellina cernua Barroso 1922, p. 88. Pedicellina cernua O’Donoghue 1926, p. 53 t. 1 i. 1,2. c 11Ttlg clareza rara até na literatura, quando se trata de introduzir uma denomi- - de uma unidade taxonomica de ordem superior, foi explicado o termo “Entoprocta”. naçao e 34| uníu sob este nome a famüia constituída pelos tres generös: Pedicellina, .Nitsche i Cori (1929 p. 2) indica “Bryozoa entoprocta” como nome usado rmr°S Nitsche mas isso não é correcto. O termo «Entoprocta” foi applicado ao grupo no sentido inalterado da descripção original em todos os livros, tanto por elles que separam , , Entoproeta dos Ectoprocta, como pelos outros que manteem os dois subd.S. da classe Bryozo, (= Polysoa). Merece porls.o adoeção ,er.l · ·- d Harmer (1931, P- 146) que considerou supérflua a nova denominação Kamptozoa propòsta°por Cori (1. c.). Dá-se, é claro, o mesmo quanto ao nome Calyssozoa, empregado por Clark (1921). O material inteiro á nossa disposição provem do litoral su­ perior. Quanto á bahia de Santos, evidentemente não estamos muito longe de conhecer a sua bryozoofauna da agua rasa, por se repetirem as especies nas varias colleeções feitas ahi. Eliminada Eucratea loricata (L.) por razões expostas anteriormente (Marcus 1937, p. 32) e não contadas as variedades nos casos onde a espe­ cie typica figura nas nossas listas, o inventario das especies deno­ minadas, até agora verificadas na bahia de Santos entre 0 e 20 m. de profundidade, importa em 95. Sem duvida é um resultado agradavel em comparação com as 81 especies conhecidas da região de Woods Hole, intensamente pesquisada em todas as profundi­ dades entre 0 e 36 m. Mas, para igualar o numero de 150 espe­ cies dos mares dinamarquezes, nem mesmo todos favoraveis para Bryozoarios por causa da salobridade do sudeste e dos fundos are­ nosos e limosos no oeste, precisamos explorar profundidade^ maio­ res. Para muitas especies a região continuamente batida até pelas ondas mínimas e mais superficiaes não se acha habitavel; teremos de dragar estes elementos de profundidades de 20 metros para baixo. Do litoral do Rio de Janeiro temos tido na mão até agora 12 especies. Se deixarmos de lado as indicações da literatura, mais ou menos dignas de confiança quanto á exactidão do lugar de pro­ veniencia, torna-se claro que se precisa esperar augmento do ma­ terial, antes de confrontar zoogeographicamente as duas bryozoo- faunas. Tres das mencionadas 12 especies da bahia de Guana­ bara ainda não conhecemos da bahia de Santos, a saber: Scrupo- cellaria cornígera (Pourt.), Boiuerbankia caudata (Hcks.) e Bus- kia socialis Hincks. Lista das especies tratadas. Entoprocta: 1 — Pedicellina cernua (P all.) 2 — Barentsia gracilis (M. S ars) 3 — Barentsia laxa Kirkp. Ectoprocta: C heilostomata A ñ a s c a : 4 — Aetea truncata (L andsb.) 5 — Conopeum reticulum (L.) 6 — Conopeum commensale Kirkp. & Metz. 7 — Electra hastingsae, nom nov. 8 — C ras simar gipatella leucocypha M arc. 9 — Steganoporella buskii H arm . 10 — Thalamoporqlla gothica (Bsk.) var. prom inens Lev. 11 — Scrupocellaria bertholletn (A ud.) 12 — Synnotum aegyptiacum (A ud.) 13 — Bugula flabellata (J. V. Thomps.) 14 — Caulibugula armata (V err.) 15 — Membraniporella aragoi (A ud.) C heilostomata A s c o p h o r a : 16 — Catenicella contei (Aud.) 17 — Euteleia evelinae, gen.
Recommended publications
  • Sepkoski, J.J. 1992. Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 83 March 1,1992 A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Families 2nd edition J. John Sepkoski, Jr. Department of the Geophysical Sciences University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois 60637 Milwaukee Public Museum Contributions in Biology and Geology Rodney Watkins, Editor (Reviewer for this paper was P.M. Sheehan) This publication is priced at $25.00 and may be obtained by writing to the Museum Gift Shop, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Orders must also include $3.00 for shipping and handling ($4.00 for foreign destinations) and must be accompanied by money order or check drawn on U.S. bank. Money orders or checks should be made payable to the Milwaukee Public Museum. Wisconsin residents please add 5% sales tax. In addition, a diskette in ASCII format (DOS) containing the data in this publication is priced at $25.00. Diskettes should be ordered from the Geology Section, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800 West Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233. Specify 3Y. inch or 5Y. inch diskette size when ordering. Checks or money orders for diskettes should be made payable to "GeologySection, Milwaukee Public Museum," and fees for shipping and handling included as stated above. Profits support the research effort of the GeologySection. ISBN 0-89326-168-8 ©1992Milwaukee Public Museum Sponsored by Milwaukee County Contents Abstract ....... 1 Introduction.. ... 2 Stratigraphic codes. 8 The Compendium 14 Actinopoda.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States Erect Bryozoa
    NOAA Technical Report NMFS 99 February 1991 Marine Flora and Fauna of the Northeastern United States Erect Bryozoa John S. Ryland Peter J. Hayward U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Report NMFS _ The major responsibilities of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) are to monitor and assess the abundance and geographic distribution of fishery resources, to understand and predict fluctuations in the quantity and distribution of these resources, and to establish levels for their optimum use. NMFS i also charged with the development and implementation of policies for managing national fishing grounds, development and enforcement of domestic fisheries regulations, urveillance of foreign fishing off nited States coastal waters, and the development and enforcement of international fishery agreements and policies. NMFS also assists the fishing industry through marketing service and economic analysis programs, and mortgage in­ surance and ve sel construction subsidies. It collects, analyzes, and publishes statistics on various phases of the industry. The NOAA Technical Report NMFS series was established in 1983 to replace two subcategories of the Technical Reports series: "Special Scientific Report-Fisheries" and "Circular." The series contains the following types of reports: Scientific investigations that document long-term continuing programs of NMFS; intensive scientific report on studies of restricted scope; papers on applied fishery problems; technical reports of general interest intended to aid conservation and management; reports that review in considerable detail and at a high technical level certain broad areas of research; and technical papers originating in economics studies and from management investigations. Since this is a formal series, all submitted papers receive peer review and those accepted receive professional editing before publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryozoa; Cheilostomata) Into Four Major Clades
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution xxx (2007) xxx–xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication Molecular phylogeny supports division of the ‘cosmopolitan’ taxon Celleporella (Bryozoa; Cheilostomata) into four major clades Roger N. Hughes a,*, Africa Go´mez b, Peter J. Wright a, Hugo I. Moyano c, Juan M. Cancino d, Gary R. Carvalho a, David H. Lunt b a School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK b Department of Biological Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK c Departamento de Zoologia, Universidad de Concepcio´n, Casilla 2407, Concepcio´n, Chile d Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Cato´lica de la Santı´sima Concepcio´n, Casilla 297, Concepcio´n, Chile Received 14 December 2006; revised 30 July 2007; accepted 23 August 2007 1. Introduction unilaminar or bilaminar) allow grouping of known morpho- species into four categories, which Moyano (1987) defined as The bryozoan family Hippothoidae is represented the subgenera Celleporella, Antarctothoa, Austrothoa and throughout the oceans by mm-scale vine-like or discoid Neothoa. A sparsely documented fossil record, however, colonies that encrust firm substrata such as macroalgae, impedes phylogenetic assessment of the proposed taxon- colonial invertebrates, living serolian isopods, shells of omy. Here we use mtDNA sequence data and phylogenetic living molluscs, dead shells, rocks, glass and plastics (Has- analysis to verify the morphologically defined taxonomy, tings, 1979; Morris, 1980; Moyano, 1987; Barnes, 2002). assess the contribution of cryptic species to diversity, and Classical taxonomy (Gordon and Hastings, 1979) recog- provide a phylogenetic framework for further studies of nizes three extant hippothoid genera: Hippothoa, Plesiot- these Bryozoa, especially in the southern oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Cheilostome Bryozoans (Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata): Structure, Research History, and Modern Problematics A
    Russian Journal of Marine Biology, Vol. 30, Suppl. 1, 2004, pp. S43–S55. Original Russian Text Copyright © 2004 by Biologiya Morya, Ostrovskii. IINVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY Brood Chambers (Ovicells) of Cheilostome Bryozoans (Bryozoa: Gymnolaemata): Structure, Research History, and Modern Problematics A. N. Ostrovskii Faculty of Biology & Soil Science, Saint-Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, 199034 Russia e-mail: [email protected] Received December 24, 2003 Abstract—The basic stages characterizing research of brood chambers (ovicells) in cheilostome bryozoans are reviewed, from their first description by J. Ellis in 1755 up to the present. The problems concerning contradic- tory views of researchers on the structure, formation, and function of ovicells are considered in detail. Special attention was paid to the development of modern terminology. Based on recent data, including paleontological data, the prospects are displayed of studying brood structures in Cheilostomata in order to better understand the phylogeny and evolution of their reproductive strategies. Key words: brooding, ovicells, anatomy, Bryozoa, Cheilostomata, evolution. Bryozoa is a widespread group of fouling suspension its reproductive strategies, in particular. Moreover, as feeders, mostly marine, with a long geological history the vast majority of cheilostome bryozoans brood their stretching back to the Early Ordovician [10]. Their colo- larvae in special brood chambers called ovicells, the nies form a significant part of the fouling in many marine presence of ovicells and their morphology are consid- biotopes, from upper sublittoral horizons to depths ered relevant taxonomic characters in bryozoology. exceeding 6000 m. Many bryozoans are extremely important components of such biotopes; they form shel- Several morphological types of brood chambers ter and are food for a broad spectrum of organisms have been distinguished, but the most widespread are inhabiting the sea floor.
    [Show full text]
  • EVOS PROPOSAL SUMMARY PAGE (Trustee Council Use Only)
    EVOS PROPOSAL SUMMARY PAGE (Trustee Council Use Only) Project No. G-030642 Date Received 9/3/02; TC approved 11/25/02 Project Title: Database on the Marine Invertebrate Macrofauna of Prince William Sound: An Addition to the University of Alaska Museum’s ARCTOS Network Project Period: FY 03-04 Proposer: Nora R. Foster University of Alaska Museum 907 Yukon Drive Fairbanks, Alaska 99099 (907) 474-7731 (907) 474-5469 fax [email protected] EVOS Funding: $19,200 Matching Funds: Study Location: Prince William Sound Trustee Agency: ADF&G ABSTRACT Data sets that present basic taxonomic and biogeographic information at the species level for 1876 plant and animal species from Prince William Sound were compiled as part of research on potential introductions of nonindigenous species. This proposal seeks funding to edit the data on the 1343 invertebrate species, and to make the literature and specimen records of their occurrences available on the University of Alaska Museum’s ARCTOS web-accessible database. 06/16/05 -1- I. INTRODUCTION Biological surveys in Prince William Sound have documented the presence of over 1645 animal species in Prince William Sound. However, most research and restoration efforts have focused on a very small set of species, primarily vertebrates, and those invertebrate species with economic value. The scientific validity of long-term monitoring of biodiversity responses to environmental change in the GEM program depends on both accurate species-level identifications, and better resolution of data on species distributions. Data sets describing biodiversity of Prince William Sound invertebrates have been compiled as part of an investigation of ballast-water mediated introductions of species into Port Valdez/Prince William Sound (Appendix I) (Foster and Feder, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Transoceanic Rafting of Bryozoa (Cyclostomata, Cheilostomata, and Ctenostomata) Across the North Pacific Ocean on Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris
    Aquatic Invasions (2018) Volume 13, Issue 1: 137–162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2018.13.1.11 © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Special Issue: Transoceanic Dispersal of Marine Life from Japan to North America and the Hawaiian Islands as a Result of the Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011 Research Article Transoceanic rafting of Bryozoa (Cyclostomata, Cheilostomata, and Ctenostomata) across the North Pacific Ocean on Japanese tsunami marine debris Megan I. McCuller1,2,* and James T. Carlton1 1Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies Program, Mystic, Connecticut 06355, USA 2Current address: Southern Maine Community College, South Portland, Maine 04106, USA Author e-mails: [email protected] (MIM), [email protected] (JTC) *Corresponding author Received: 3 April 2017 / Accepted: 31 October 2017 / Published online: 15 February 2018 Handling editor: Amy E. Fowler Co-Editors’ Note: This is one of the papers from the special issue of Aquatic Invasions on “Transoceanic Dispersal of Marine Life from Japan to North America and the Hawaiian Islands as a Result of the Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011." The special issue was supported by funding provided by the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) of the Government of Japan through the North Pacific Marine Science Organization (PICES). Abstract Forty-nine species of Western Pacific coastal bryozoans were found on 317 objects (originating from the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of 2011) that drifted across the North Pacific Ocean and landed in the Hawaiian Islands and North America. The most common species were Scruparia ambigua (d’Orbigny, 1841) and Callaetea sp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Broadly Resolved Molecular Phylogeny of New Zealand Cheilostome Bryozoans As a Framework for Hypotheses of Morphological Evolu
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.415943; this version posted December 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A broadly resolved molecular phylogeny of New Zealand cheilostome bryozoans as a framework for hypotheses of morphological evolution. RJS Orra*, E Di Martinoa, DP Gordonb, MH Ramsfjella, HL Melloc, AM Smithc & LH Liowa,d* aNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway bNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand cDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand dCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway *corresponding authors bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.08.415943; this version posted December 9, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Larger molecular phylogenies based on ever more genes are becoming commonplace with the advent of cheaper and more streamlined sequencing and bioinformatics pipelines. However, many groups of inconspicuous but no less evolutionarily or ecologically important marine invertebrates are still neglected in the quest for understanding species- and higher- level phylogenetic relationships. Here, we alleviate this issue by presenting the molecular sequences of 165 cheilostome bryozoan species from New Zealand waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida) A
    Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 84: 15–24 (January 2003) OvicellBlackwell Science, Ltd structure in Callopora dumerilii and C. lineata (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida) A. N. Ostrovsky1 and P. Schäfer2 Abstract 1Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Ostrovsky, A.N. and Schäfer P. 2002. Ovicell structure in Callopora dumerilii and Faculty of Biology and Soil Science, C. lineata (Bryozoa: Cheilostomatida). — Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 84: 15–24 St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaja nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, Anatomical and SEM-studies of the brood-chambers (ovicells) in two bryozoans 199034, Russia; 2Institut für (Callopora dumerilii and C. lineata) were undertaken to resolve a long-term Geowissenschaften, Christian-Albrechts- controversy existing in the literature about the origin of the ovicells. In contrast Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, with the interpretation of Silén (1945), both species investigated possess 24118 Kiel, Germany hyperstomial ovicells with the ooecium formed by the distal (daughter) zooid. The ooecial coelomic cavity communicates with the zooidal coelom through a Keywords: anatomy, development, brooding, ovicells, pore-like canal or canals remaining after the closure of an arch-shaped slit. The Callopora, Cheilostomatida, Bryozoa slit forms during ovicellogenesis. The communication canals are normally plugged by epithelial cells, however incompletely closed canals were also found Accepted for publication: in Callopora lineata. SEM-studies of noncleaned, air-dried specimens showed 1 February 2002 a relationship between membranous and calcified parts during early ovicellogenesis. It starts from a transverse wall as the calcification of the proximal part of the daughter zooid frontal wall, and has the shape of two flat rounded plates. There are no knobs or any other outgrowths.
    [Show full text]
  • Redesign of PCR Primers for Mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase Subunit I for Marine Invertebrates and Application in All-Taxa Biotic Surveys
    Molecular Ecology Resources (2013) doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12138 Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys J. GELLER,* C. MEYER,† M. PARKER† and H. HAWK*1 *Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, 8272 Moss Landing Road, Moss Landing CA 95309, USA, †Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC 20013-7012, USA Abstract DNA barcoding is a powerful tool for species detection, identification and discovery. Metazoan DNA barcoding is primarily based upon a specific region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene that is PCR amplified by primers HCO2198 and LCO1490 (‘Folmer primers’) designed by Folmer et al. (Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology,3, 1994, 294). Analysis of sequences published since 1994 has revealed mismatches in the Folmer primers to many meta- zoans. These sequences also show that an extremely high level of degeneracy would be necessary in updated Folmer primers to maintain broad taxonomic utility. In primers jgHCO2198 and jgLCO1490, we replaced most fully degener- ated sites with inosine nucleotides that complement all four natural nucleotides and modified other sites to better match major marine invertebrate groups. The modified primers were used to amplify and sequence cytochrome c oxi- dase subunit I from 9105 specimens from Moorea, French Polynesia and San Francisco Bay, California, USA repre- senting 23 phyla, 42 classes and 121 orders. The new primers, jgHCO2198 and jgLCO1490, are well suited for routine DNA barcoding, all-taxon surveys and metazoan metagenomics. Keywords: biotic surveys, cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, DNA barcoding, Moorea, universal primers Received 20 March 2013; revision received 22 May 2013; accepted 5 June 2013 databases at the Web of Science on 21 February 2013 Introduction revealed 2967 citations of the Folmer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Biodiversity: a Taxonomic Inventory of Fauna
    Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna Irish Wildlife Manual No. 38 Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna S. E. Ferriss, K. G. Smith, and T. P. Inskipp (editors) Citations: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Section author (2009) Section title . In: Ferriss, S. E., Smith K. G., & Inskipp T. P. (eds.) Irish Biodiversity: a taxonomic inventory of fauna. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 38. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photos: © Kevin G. Smith and Sarah E. Ferriss Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: N. Kingston and F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 1393 - 6670 Inventory of Irish fauna ____________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................3 Methodology........................................................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Ostrovsky, Andrew N., 2008. the Parental Care in Cheilostome Bryozoans
    Paper in: Patrick N. Wyse Jackson & Mary E. Spencer Jones (eds) (2008) Annals of Bryozoology 2: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association, Dublin, pp. viii+442. PARENTAL CARE IN CHEILOSTOME BRYOZOANS: HISTORICAL REVIEW 211 The parental care in cheilostome bryozoans: a historical review Andrew N. Ostrovsky Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology & Soil Science, St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaja nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia Current address: Institut für Paläontologie, Geozentrum, Universität Wien, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090, Wien, Austria. e-mail: [email protected] 1. Ovicells, oviposition and placental brooding 2. Other types of external brood chambers with calcified walls 3. Internal brood chambers and intracoelomic brooding 4. External brooding sacs 5. Acknowledgements Cheilostome bryozoans possess a range of methods for embryonic incubation. Embryos are brooded in the external membranous sacs, skeletal (calcified) chambers and internal brooding sacs formed by non-calcified zooidal walls, or develop intracoelomically in viviparous species. In some instances extraembryonic nutrition has been evolved. Most cheilostomes keep their young in the skeletal chambers called ovicells. Presence or absence of the ovicells as well as their morphology is considered to be important characters in the taxonomy of Cheilostomata. There are several morphological types of ovicells, and most common are hyperstomial ones that often look like hemispherical bubbles or helmets on the colony surface. Basically, the hyperstomial ovicell consists of a two-walled calcified fold (ooecium) with a coelomic cavity inside, a non-calcified distal wall of the maternal autozooid (that produces eggs), and the brooding cavity between them (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • THE SUBTIDAL BRYOZOAN FAUNA OFF CAPE ARAGO, OREGON By
    THE SUBTIDAL BRYOZOAN FAUNA OFF CAPE ARAGO, OREGON By Dylan M. Cottrell A THESIS Presented to the Department of Biology And the Robert D. Clark Honors College of the University of Oregon In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Bachelor of Science May 2013 ii Copyright 2013 Dylan Cottrell iii An Abstract of the Thesis of Dylan Michael Cottrell for the degree of Bachelor of Science In the Department of Biology to be taken June 17th, 2013. Title: SUBTIDAL BRYOZOAN FAUNA OFF CAPE ARAGO, OREGON Approved: Dr. Craig M. Young The subtidal marine biodiversity off the Oregon coast is poorly studied and not well understood. The few subtidal studies in Oregon have focused on vertebrates with little regard to invertebrate assemblages. Oregon’s subtidal Bryozoa play key roles in these assemblages by providing habitat, food, and, potentially, pollution sequestration. Using dredge samples collected over two years, we assembled a comprehensive list of Bryozoa found between 30-60 m depth off Cape Arago, Oregon. A total of 41 species were collected, including one new species in the genus Fenestruloides. Although 25 families were represented in our samples, 17 (68%) families were only represented by one species and only two families (8%) were represented by more than three species. This data provides the first comprehensive survey of Oregon’s subtidal bryozoan biodiversity and is an important first step in understanding the region’s biodiversity. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Craig Young for his support and guidance that made this research possible as well as his work editing this thesis.
    [Show full text]