DOCSLIB.ORG

Toronto (3-4 May).P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Toronto (3-4 May).P65 hours available CLE/CPD * A conference presented by the Antitrust and Trade Law Section of the International Bar Association and the National Competition Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association. International Bar Association and Canadian Bar Association combined Spring Competition Law Conference NorthNorth AmericaAmerica andand thethe globalisationglobalisation ofof 3-4 May 2007 antitrustantitrust Sutton Place Hotel TORONTO, Canada Supported by * Up to 9.5 hours available as per the Law Society of England and Wales. Up to 12 hours available as per the Law Society of Upper Canada. The Who should attend? number of CPD points/hours Antitrust, competition, commercial and corporate lawyers in private available may vary for other bar practice, in-house counsel, economists, enforcement officials and associations and law societies depending on their criteria. academics. Conference Co-Chairs Bruno Ciuffetelli Hogan & Hartson LLP, Caracas; Chair, Antitrust Committee, IBA Legal Practice Division Programme James Musgrove Lang Michener LLP, Toronto, Ontario; Chair, National Competition Law Section, Canadian Bar Association Thursday 3 May 0800 – 1730 Richard Parker O’Melveny & Myers LLP, • Are efficiency enhancing mergers between Registration Washington DC competitors in the national interest? Madeleine Renaud McCarthy Tétrault LLP, What about the multinational interest? 0900 – 0910 Montreal, Quebec Co-Moderators Opening remarks Richard Taylor Deputy Commissioner of Calvin Goldman Blake Cassels & Graydon By the conference co-chairs Competition, Civil Matters Branch, LLP, Toronto, Ontario Canadian Competition Bureau, Gatineau, Inigo Igartua Arregui Gomez-Acebo & 0910 – 0945 Quebec Pombo, Barcelona; Senior Vice-Chair, Keynote address Antitrust Committee, IBA Legal Practice Sheridan Scott Commissioner of 1045 – 1115 Coffee/Tea break Division Competition, Canadian Competition Bureau, Gatineau, Quebec Panellists 1230 – 1400 Lunch Melanie Aitken Acting Deputy Introduction and appreciation by the Sponsored by Cole and Partners Commissioner of Competition, Mergers conference co-chairs Keynote address Branch, Canadian Competition Bureau, Tom Barnett Assistant Attorney General, Gatineau, Quebec 0945 – 1230 Antitrust Division, US Department of Steve Newborn Weil Gotshal & Manges Abuse of dominance: Justice, Washington DC LLP, Washington DC international convergence or Jonathan Scott Herbert Smith LLP, Introduction divergence? London Ronan Harty Davis Polk & Wardwell, With a new ICN working group on unilateral New York; Senior Vice-Chair, Antitrust conduct, the release of guidelines on Article 1500 – 1730 Committee, IBA Legal Practice Division 82 expected in Europe during the first half of Mergers: advocacy with 2007, hearings on section 2 of the Sherman Appreciation reviewing agencies Act and the first ever appellate decision on Don Affleck Affleck Greene Orr LLP, This roundtable session will explore abuse of dominance in Canada, this area of Toronto, Ontario; Past Chair, National the importance of effective advocacy to law has come under a worldwide spotlight. Competition Law Section, Canadian Bar the outcome of complex merger review. At the same time, it has become increasingly Association Recent decisions by regulators in a number complex and more difficult to navigate, of high-profile merger cases highlight the particularly for cross-border businesses. 1400 – 1500 Showcase panel importance of qualitative assessment criteria This panel of experts from Canada, the and regulatory strategy to the outcome United States and Europe will explain the Merger efficiencies in Canada, of merger review. What approaches for implications of recent changes and cases the United States and Europe presenting your case to regulators will tip such as Canada Pipe, British Airways and Mergers between competitors have the their decision – to challenge your merger Trinko on firms’ pricing, marketing and potential to generate significant efficiencies. or to close their investigation without a distribution practices. Such mergers may not materialise, however, challenge – in your client’s favour? if merger rules do not accord efficiencies Topics to be addressed by this panel include: In particular, how do you establish: significant weight or agencies take too long • What conduct falls foul of the rules and • whether entry or expansion is likely to to clear efficiency enhancing mergers. The when? Rebates? Tying? Single branding? occur post merger? Canadian Commissioner of Competition has Low pricing? • that foreign imports will or will not be recently announced that the Competition • In what circumstances is effects-based sufficient to constrain the market power Bureau will both clear anti-competitive analysis of economic evidence more of the merging parties? mergers where the efficiencies defence is appropriate than per se rules? • whether coordinated behaviour will occur? met, and do so quickly, without resort to a • How to minimise the burden of complying • the extent to which buyers really do have lengthy hearing in certain circumstances. with different rules in different countries? countervailing power? This showcase panel will put the Bureau’s Co-Moderators Drawing on their experiences in complex new position in global context, examining Brian A Facey Blake Cassels & Graydon merger cases, including Whirlpool/Maytag, the role of merger efficiencies in Canada, LLP, Toronto, Ontario AO Smith/GSW, Airtours and Diageo/Pernod Europe and the United States and Gregory McCurdy Microsoft Corporation, Ricard/Seagram, the panel will discuss what implications for cross-border cases. It will Seattle, Washington; Vice-Chair, Antitrust constitutes effective advocacy in the merger address issues such as: Committee, IBA Legal Practice Division review context, and strategies for addressing • What role do merger efficiencies now play the factual issues and overcoming the legal Panellists in Canada, the EC and the United States? hurdles that antitrust counsel face in Lorena Boix Alonso Policy Adviser, • Will US and EC agencies match the complex merger cases. Cabinet of the Commissioner for Canadian approach? Or will Canadian Co-Moderators Competition, European Commission, businesses gain a competitive advantage? Ronan Harty Brussels • How do different approaches affect Jay Holsten Torys LLP, Toronto, Ontario; Kenneth L Glazer Deputy Director, Bureau timing/acceptance of efficiencies in cross- Chair, CBA National Competition Law of Competition, US Federal Trade border cases? Section Mergers Committee Commission, Washington DC • Are efficiencies being left on the table Gil Ohana Director, Antitrust and because of procedural roadblocks or Competition, Cisco Systems Inc, San Jose, substantive uncertainty? California Friday 4 May Panellists 0815 – 1230 1130 – 1230 Paul Cuomo Howrey LLP, Washington DC Registration Roundtable: Peter Franklyn Osler Hoskin & Harcourt judging economics LLP, Toronto, Ontario 0845 – 1130 Economic theories and techniques are Malcolm Nicholson Slaughter and May, International cartel evolving continuously and competition London enforcement litigation is becoming more complex. This Margaret Sanderson CRA International, Cartels continue to be a top enforcement panel will examine how economic evidence Toronto, Ontario priority in North America, Europe and, can best be presented to and adjudicated by Jeff Schmidt Director, Bureau of increasingly, in other jurisdictions. Over courts/tribunals. In particular, the panellists Competition, US Federal Trade the past year there have been numerous will discuss: Commission, Washington DC changes to leniency programmes and • The uses and limitations of various types practices, with a particular focus on the of expert economic evidence ranging from 1545 – 1615 Coffee/Tea break treatment of second and subsequent theories/models to econometric cooperating parties. simulations • Challenges to expert witnesses based on This panel will cover important developments qualifications and methodology standards 1800 – 1945 Reception in the following areas: (eg the US ‘Daubert’ standards), acting as Gardiner Museum • Revisions to immunity programmes advocates or becoming fact witnesses 111 Queen’s Park, Toronto • The treatment of subsequent cooperating • Best practices for leading direct economic Sponsored by CRA International parties evidence and cross-examining experts • Access of private plaintiffs to evidence • Alternatives to the traditional ‘opposing generated from cooperation with experts’ model including panels of experts enforcement agencies (‘hot tubbing’) and tribunal-appointed • The implications and risks for companies experts which defend rather than cooperate Co-Moderators Co-Moderators Joe Angland Heller Ehrman LLP, New York; Neil Campbell McMillan Binch Chair, Antitrust Section, American Bar Mendelsohn LLP, Toronto, Ontario; Association Vice-Chair, Antitrust Committee, IBA J William Rowley QC McMillan Binch Legal Practice Division Mendelsohn, Toronto, Ontario; Chair, IBA Sandra Forbes Davies Ward Phillips & Global Forum for Competition and Trade Vineberg LLP, Toronto, Ontario Policy Panellists Panellists Peter Armitage Blake Dawson, Waldron, Dennis Carlton Deputy Assistant Attorney Sydney, New South Wales General, Antitrust Division, US Randy Hughes McCarthy Tetrault LLP, Department of Justice and Commissioner, Toronto, Ontario US Antitrust Modernisation Commission, Katherine Kay Stikeman Elliott LLP, Chicago, Illinois Toronto, Ontario Hon Mr Justice Marshall Rothstein James H Mutchnik Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Supreme Court
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pan-Canadian Conference on Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Restructuring Law
    cba.org Pan-Canadian Conference on Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Restructuring Law Presented by the Canadian Bar Association's Please join us in the beautiful historical city of Old Québec for this National Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law inaugural Pan-Canadian Conference on Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Section and the Continuing Legal Education Committee Restructuring Law. Highlights of the conference will include this country’s leading experts canvassing the latest developments in commercial and In collaboration with: consumer insolvency matters arising from coast to coast. This Pan- The Office of the Superintendent in Bankruptcy of Canada and The Canadian Canadian conference will focus on commercial as well as consumer Association of Insolvency and Restructuring insolvencies, small and large restructuring, inter-provincial issues and Professionals (CAIRP) international developments. We will also be examining all the hot issues September 15-16, 2005 surrounding Bill C-55, which is presently before Parliament. You will be Chateau Frontenac, Quebec City provided with an excellent opportunity to meet and mingle with insolvency law practitioners and restructuring professionals from across the country. We look forward to seeing you in Quebec City. This program has been accredited by the Corporate & Commercial Law Specialty Committee of the Law Society of Upper Canada for 6.5 hours towards the professional development requirement for certification Program Agenda THURSDAY, September 15, 2005 7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Welcoming Reception for all registered
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Bar Review
    THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW is the organ of the Canadian Bar Association, and it is felt that its pages should be open to free and fair discussion of all matters of interest to the legal profession in Canada. The Editor, however, wishes it to be understood that opinions expressed in signed articles are those of the individual writers only, and that the REVIEW does not assume any responsibility for them. IVSpecial articles must be typed before being sent to the Editor, Charles Morse, K.G., Room 707 Blackburn Building, Sparks Street, Ottawa. Notes of Cases must be sent to Mr. Sidney E. Smith, Dalhousie Law School, Halifax, -N.S. TOPICS OF THE MONTH. MR . ROwELL AT WASHINGTON--The Honourable Newton W. Rowell, K.C., President of the Canadian Bar Association, was guest of honour and principal speaker at the annual dinner of the American Bar Association held in Washington, D .C., on the 15th instant . The press refers to his speech as one of remarkable farce and brilliance. We quote from the Washington correspondent of the Ottawa Citizen : His speech indeed was of outstanding interest even on a programme which during the week had included the President of the United States, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, Lord Reading, former Viceroy of India,- and eminent members of the American Bar. Mr. Rowell spoke both as a lawyer and as close student of international problems. His speech particularly revealed his deep interest in the great subject of world peace. A FRIEND OF THE ASSOCIATION PASSES.-Members of the Canadian Bar Association who attended this year's meeting at Calgary will hear with deep regret of the death of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • June 11, 2019 Via Email: Assistance
    June 11, 2019 Via email: [email protected]; [email protected] The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada Leader, Liberal Party of Canada 350 Albert Street, Suite 920 Ottawa, ON K1P 6M8 Dear Party Leader, We are writing on behalf of the Canadian Bar Association, as you prepare for the coming federal election campaign, to urge your party to commit to access to justice for all Canadians. The Canadian Bar Association is a national association of lawyers, law student, notaries and academics, with a mandate that includes seeking improvements in the law and administration of justice, and access to justice. We are here to help with the legal expertise of over 36,000 members, who live in every jurisdiction of Canada. Many people believe legal problems only happen to others. But, over three years, 45% of Canadians will have a problem needing a legal solution. And predictably, people with less money have more legal problems. Equal access to justice is not a reality in Canada now. Legal aid, Canada’s most important access to justice program, is too often inconsistently available, even for essential legal needs. As federal contributions have waned, some provinces and territories have tried to fill gaps. As a result, services vary as to who gets help and for what across Canada, much more than for other essential public services. A single mother working for minimum wage might get a lawyer for a child custody problem in one province, but in the next province be directed to a website or self-help materials.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CENTENARY of OSGOODE HALL. on the 6Th of Last Month
    THE CENTENARY OF OSGOODE HALL. On the 6th of last month occurred the one hundredth anniversary of the entry of the Law Society of Upper Canada into possession of that stately pile in the City of Toronto known as Osgoode Hall, to be thereafter used as the permanent home of the Society. The afternoon and evening of the 18th of that month were devoted to a formal celebration of the event by the Society, and the Hall was thrown open to a great throng of guests who welcomed the privilege of assisting in the commemoration of an event rich in associations with the progress of the Canadian people as a law-abiding community Nowhere else on the North American continent is to be found a central home for the Bar so closely akin, not only in purpose but also in spirit and activities, as is Osgoode Hall to the English Inns of Court. This estimate of its character is supported by the following extract from the pamphlet entitled "Osgoode Hall," printed by the Society as a memorial of the Centenary : "For a century the Society has been located and carrying on its work at Osgoode Hall holding its Convocation meetings, issuing its official Reports of the decisions of the Courts, controlling the educa tion of students-at-law, regulating their call to the Bar and admission as solicitors, maintaining its extensive library and supervising the conduct of its members generally . A rule of the Society has for a century read : 'The permanent seat of the Law Society shall be at Osgoode Hall in the City of Toronto.' Mat' it so continue for centuries to come!" * Probably the most interesting feature of the celebra- tion of the Centenary was the calling to the Bar of the Province of the Prime Minister of Canada, the Honourable R.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Effective Change
    INFLUENCE. LEADERSHIP. PROTECTION. Winner of the Award for Outstanding Achievement in Programming in the Association for Continuing Legal Education (ACLEA) "ACLEA's Best" for 2010. Sixth Annual Canadian Bar Association Law Firm Leadership Conference Best Practices for Effective Change November 22-23, 2010 Park Hyatt TORONTO Program Sixth Annual Canadian Bar Association Law Firm Leadership Conference - Best Practices for Effective Change Conference Co-Chairs: Norman Bacal, National Co-Managing Partner, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Toronto Gary Luftspring, Partner, Ricketts, Harris LLP, Toronto Conference Facilitator: Richard Susskind, CBA Special Adviser, Author, Transforming the Law and The End of Lawyers? London, UK Now in its sixth year, the CBA’s Law Firm Leadership Conference has become the essential professional development event for managing partners and up-and-coming law firm leaders in Canada. Building on the dialogue among law firm leaders, clients and industry experts at the 2009 Leadership Conference on Change Management, the CBA is pleased to offer in 2010 an interactive program on best practices for achieving effective change. You will come away from the conference with the tools and the practical “know-how” to tackle tomorrow’s challenges – how to prepare your firm for change, connecting social media with business results, understanding your IT needs and costs, considering outsourcing in the Canadian context, and more. This year, we are delighted to welcome Richard Susskind, legal futurist, author of The End of Lawyers? and Special Adviser to the CBA, as our conference facilitator. Richard Susskind will bring his considerable knowledge and expertise in the future of legal services to set the stage for our program, draw thematic links between the sessions, moderate our panels and facilitate questions from our participants.
    [Show full text]
  • R. B. BENNETT ED DUNSWORTH FINDS a a “Progressive” Alumnus PATHWAY to CHANGE Remembered on in NICARAGUA 80Th Anniversary
    LAW COMMUNITY PAYS TRIBUTE TO PHILLIP SAUNDERS’ DEANSHIP HEARSAYVOLUME 33, 2010/11 R. B. BENNETT ED DUNSWORTH FINDS A A “ProgressiVE” alumnus PATHWAY TO CHANGE remembered ON IN NICARAGUA 80TH anniVersary SPEAKER PETER MILLIKEN SPEAKS OF “HIS DAY” AT THE LAW SCHOOL PAULA TAYLOR SCALES KILIMANJARO FOR YOUTH AND MENTAL HEALTH Hearsay 2010/11 1 VOLUME 33, 2010/2011 THE FORREST BUILDING: Home of Dalhousie Law School 1887 to 1952 conContentsTEnts FEATURES: DEPARTMENTS: 36 SCHOOL NEWS A Progressive Prime Minister 6 Law community pays tribute to Dean Phillip R.B. Bennett—Canada’s Depression Prime Saunders Minister Douglas M. Johnston lecture launched IB&M Initiative wins Touchstone award 12 2010 Weldon Award Winner Hearsay Hats off to Brian Flemming THE DAlHouSiE lAw Alumni mAgAzinE 42 STUDENT NOTES 2010 Discretionary Award winners Volume 33 2010/11 Changing China 13 Students pitch in to help rebuild New Orleans Daniel Laprés’ impressions of China today 16 Pathway to Change 48 FacULty NEWS A trip to Nicaragua changes Ed Dunsworth’s life Professor Bill Charles joins former student in tar ponds cleanup Anne Matthewman joins the library 51 FacULty PROfiLES Dean Kim Brooks, B.A., LL.B., LL.M. 58 DONOR REPOrt Editors Professor John Yogis, LL.B. ‘64 62 GrapEvinE Karen Kavanaugh IN MEMOriaM Copy Editor 68 Judy Kavanagh Writers Michael Karanicolas Julie-Ann Sobowale Grapevine Editor Marlene MacDonald 20 In My Day An interview with the Honourable Peter Milliken Cover Photo: Corbis Images 23 Marshall’s Unsung Hero Stephen Aronson the man who freed Donald Marshall Jr. The editors welcome contributions, 25 The Road Less Traveled information, and ideas from alumni.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Bar Review
    THE CANADIAN BAR REVIEW VOL . XXXIV NOVEMBER 1956 No . 9 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL RESEARCH* Foreword At the Thirty-fifth Annual Meeting of the Canadian Bar Asso- ciation held-in Winnipeg in 1954,1 the President was authorized by the Executive Committee to appoint a special committee to look into the condition of legal research in Canada and to report to the Association on the following and other related matters 1 . What is the role of legal research in Canada? 2. What in the past has been the Canadian contribution in the way of legal research? , 3 . If in the committee's opiniop this, contribution has been less than it might, or ought, to have been, what are the reasons? 4. What steps should be taken, by the Association as well as other agencies, to encourage legal research? 5. If a programme of organized research were undertaken in Canada, what in the committee's opinion should be.the priorities? By the end of November 1954 the Committee on Legal Research was formed with the following membership : Professor F. R. Scott, F.R.S.C. (Chairman); Dean W. F. Bowker; Q.C. ; Arthur N. Carter, Q.C., LL.D. ; Léon Lalande, O.B.E., Q.C. ; The Hon. V. C. MacD.onald, LL.D. ; Professor Albert Mayrand, Q.C. ; G. V. V. Nicholls, Q.C. ; Sydney L. Robins ; Terence Sheard,. *This report was adopted by the Council of the Canadian Bar Asso- ciation at its meeting held on September 3rd, 1956, during the Thirty- eighth Annual Meeting of the Association at Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • Fédération Des Associations De Juristes D'expression
    FÉDÉRATION DES ASSOCIATIONS DE JURISTES D’EXPRESSION FRANÇAISE DE COMMON LAW INC. Bill C-78, Divorce Act Brief submitted to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on November 19, 2018 Foreword The mandate of the Fédération des associations de juristes d’expression française (FAJEF), which encompasses seven associations of French-speaking lawyers (AJEFs), is to promote access to justice in French in the majority anglophone provinces and territories of Canada. There are associations of French-speaking lawyers in the four Western provinces and in Ontario, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The seven associations of French-speaking lawyers together represent approximately 1,700 legal professionals and the number of French-speaking lawyers increases every year. The FAJEF works closely with the network of AJEFs, national legal organizations such as the Canadian Bar Association (CBA), and the Fédération des communautés francophones et acadienne du Canada (FCFA). In fact, the FAJEF is a member of the FCFA. In addition, the FAJEF has worked actively for about four years within the Réseau national de formation en justice (RNFJ). The RNFJ membership is made up of educational institutions outside Quebec such as the jurilinguistic centres in Moncton and Ottawa, the Centre canadien de français juridique inc., a number of francophone colleges and universities in Canada, and several anglophone Canadian universities that offer programs in French. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bilingualism and Bijuralism at the Supreme Court of Canada
    Bilingualism and Bijuralism at the Supreme Court of Canada Matthew Shoemaker Section 5 of the Supreme Court Act states “Any person may be appointed a judge who is or has been a judge of a superior court of a province or a barrister or advocate of at least ten years standing at the bar of a province.” Other than a legislated requirement for three judges to be members of the Québec Bar, there are no other qualifications. In June 2008, Bill C-559 was introduced by Yvon Godin, MP for Acadie-Bathurst. It required that candidates for the Supreme Court may be appointed only if he or she understands French and English without the assistance 2012 CanLIIDocs 295 of an interpreter. Although the Bill did not become law, this article shows that bilingualism for the Court is a highly controversial topic. It also argues that a more important issue, bijuralism, was largely ignored in the recent debate. The author believes that Canada would be better off if the debate about bilingualism included a debate about bijuralism. sk most people in Canada about bilingualism, law and the right to establish a “General Court of and chances are you will elicit an opinion, Appeal for Canada”. whether positive or negative. Ask people about A In 1875, the Supreme Court was established under bijuralism and chances are you will elicit a confused Prime Minister Alexander Mackenzie. Initially proposed look. Bilingualism is covered in the media, debated by Prime Minister MacDonald, it was Mackenzie’s regularly in Parliament and taught in schools. Few bill that eventually engrained Québec’s unique legal in Canada, outside the legal field, would even know system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Party Leader, We Are Writing on Behalf of the Canadian Bar
    Dear Party Leader, We are writing on behalf of the Canadian Bar Association, as you prepare for the coming federal election campaign, to urge your party to commit to access to justice for all Canadians. The Canadian Bar Association is a national association of lawyers, law students, notaries and academics, with a mandate that includes seeking improvements in the law and administration of justice, and access to justice. We are here to help with the legal expertise of over 34,000 members, who live in every jurisdiction of Canada. Many people believe legal problems only happen to others. But, over three years, 45% of Canadians will have a problem needing a legal solution. And predictably, people with less money have more legal problems. Equal access to justice is not a reality in Canada now. Legal aid, Canada’s most important access to justice program, is too often inconsistently available, even for essential legal needs. As federal contributions have waned, some provinces and territories have tried to fill gaps. As a result, services vary as to who gets help and for what across Canada, much more than for other essential public services. A single mother working for minimum wage might get a lawyer for a child custody problem in one province, but in the next province be directed to a website or self-help materials. For criminal matters, we know too well about Canada’s excessive incarceration of certain populations, including Indigenous people and people with mental illnesses. For all those accused of crimes, and especially for vulnerable people, legal help at the appropriate time can make the difference between a just and unjust result.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick Task Force on Protecting Pensions
    New Brunswick Task Force on Protecting Pensions NATIONAL PENSIONS AND BENEFITS LAW SECTION CANADIAN BAR ASSOCIATION September 2011 500-865 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5S8 tel/tél : 613.237.2925 | toll free/sans frais : 1.800.267.8860 | fax/téléc : 613.237.0185 | [email protected] | www.cba.org PREFACE The Canadian Bar Association is a national association representing 37,000 jurists, including lawyers, notaries, law teachers and students across Canada. The Association's primary objectives include improvement in the law and in the administration of justice. This submission was prepared by the National Pensions and Benefits Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association, with assistance from the Legislation and Law Reform Directorate at the National Office. The submission has been reviewed by the Legislation and Law Reform Committee and approved as a public statement of the National Pensions and Benefits Law Section of the Canadian Bar Association. Copyright © 2011 Canadian Bar Association TABLE OF CONTENTS New Brunswick Task Force on Protecting Pensions I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................... 1 II. ISSUES ............................................................................. 1 A. Harmonization ........................................................................... 1 B. Target Benefit Plans .................................................................. 2 C. Minimum Solvency Funding ...................................................... 3 D. Surplus Use and Ownership .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 695 INTRODUCTION: BACK to the FUTURE of LAW SCHOOL Special
    INTRODUCTION 695 INTRODUCTION: BACK TO THE FUTURE OF LAW SCHOOL ERIC M. ADAMS* Special Issue Coordinator Just over one hundred years ago, the first law students arrived at the University of Alberta, Faculty of Law. The University — still just a handful of brick buildings dotting a freshly cleared campus conveying more hopeful promise than venerable history — provided space, but not much else: practicing lawyers travelled across the North Saskatchewan River from downtown Edmonton to give the lectures, and the Law Society of Alberta set the exams.1 Students purchased or borrowed the assigned texts and studied an array of courses still familiar: contracts, property, constitutional law, statute law, common law, equity, torts, criminal law, evidence, private international law, practice and procedure, commercial law, company law, and wills.2 By the early 1920s, the Faculty of Law had gained full control of the LL.B. program, now the exclusive route of admission to the Bar in the province of Alberta. “This year will see the graduation of the first law class trained entirely within the University,” the campus newspaper proudly proclaimed.3 Celebrating its Harvard-inspired “case method of study … recognized to be the best known system for the study of law,” “excellent teaching staff and an adequate library,” the Gateway set its eyes to the future, when “Alberta will have the best law school in the Dominion.”4 But, of course, learning the law predated the arrival of the law school and its ambitions. Before the establishment of the Faculty, admission to the Bar in Alberta followed the professional educational model of a period of law office study, occasional lectures, and required readings culminating in an examination on “the general principles of the common law and equity jurisprudence, the British North America Act, and amendments thereto, the Statutes of the Dominion, and the Ordinances of the North-west Territories.”5 But even * Associate Professor, University of Alberta, Faculty of Law.
    [Show full text]