Coal Mining and Production

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coal Mining and Production Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook WORLD BANK GROUP Effective July 1998 Coal Mining and Production Industry Description and Practices waste streams: fine materials that are discharged as a slurry to a tailings impoundment, and coarse Coal is one of the world’s most plentiful energy material (typically greater than 0.5 millimeters) resources, and its use is likely to quadruple by that is hauled away as a solid waste. 2020. Coal occurs in a wide range of forms and qualities; but there are two broad categories: (a) Waste Characteristics hard coal, which includes coking coal, used to produce steel, and other bituminous and anthra- The main impacts of surface mining are, in gen- cite coals used for steam and power generation, eral, massive disturbances of large areas of land and (b) brown coal (subbituminous and lignite), and possible disruption of surface and ground- which is used mostly as onsite fuel. Coal has a water patterns. In some surface mines, the gen- wide range of moisture content (2–40%), sulfur eration of acid mine drainage (AMD) is a major content (0.2–8%), and ash content (5–40%). These problem. Other significant impacts include fugi- can affect the value of the coal as a fuel and cause tive dust and disposal of overburden and waste environmental problems in its use. rock. The depth, thickness, and configuration of the In underground mines, the surface disturbance coal seams determine the mode of extraction. is less obvious, but the extent of subsidence can Shallow, flat coal deposits are mined by surface be very large. Methane generation and release can processes, which are generally less costly per ton also be a problem under certain geological con- of coal mined than underground mines of simi- ditions. If groundwater systems are disturbed, lar capacity. Strip mining is one of the most eco- the possibility of serious pollution from highly nomical surface processes. Here removal of saline or highly acidic water exists. Impacts may overburden and coal extraction proceed in par- continue long after mining ceases. allel strips along the face of the coal deposit, with Table 1 presents the levels of liquid effluents, the spoil being deposited behind the operation solid waste, and dust generated by the major in the previously mined areas. In open pit min- mining techniques. ing, thick seams (tens of meters) are mined by Beneficiation plants produce large volumes of traditional quarrying techniques. Underground tailings and solid wastes. Storage and handling mining is used for deep seams. Underground of coal generates dust at rates of as much as 3 mining methods vary according to the site con- kilograms per metric ton (kg/t) of coal mined, ditions, but all involve the removal of seams fol- with the ambient dust concentration ranging lowed by more or less controlled subsidence of from 10 to 300 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/ the overlying strata. m3) above the background level at the mine site. Raw coal may be sold as mined or may be pro- cessed in a beneficiation/washing plant to re- Pollution Prevention and Control move noncombustible materials (up to 45% reduction in ash content) and inorganic sulfur (up Early planning and careful design of operations to 25% reduction). Coal beneficiation is based on are the key to minimizing pollution associated wet physical processes such as gravity separa- with mining activities. Specific responsibilities tion and flotation. Beneficiation produces two should be assigned for the implementation and 282 Coal Mining and Production 283 Table 1. Loads Per Unit of Coal Production, by Mining Technique (tons per 1,000 tons coal produced) Surface mining Underground mining Waste characteristic Contour Area Conventional Longwall Liquid effluents 0.24 1.2 1 1.6 Solid waste 10 10 3 5 Dust 0.1 0.06 0.006 0.01 Note: Local conditions will form the basis for choosing the appropriate mining method. Source: Based on Edgar 1983. monitoring of environmental measures. Before • Reduction of dust by early revegetation and mining begins, a mining plan and a mine closure by good maintenance of roads and work ar- and restoration plan must be prepared and ap- eas. Specific dust suppression measures, such proved. These plans define the sequence and as minimizing drop distances, covering equip- nature of extraction operations and detail the ment, and wetting storage piles, may be re- methods to be used in closure and restoration. quired for coal handling and loading facilities. The plans should be updated regularly (every 3 Release of dust from crushing and other coal to 5 years) as mining progresses. processing and beneficiation operations should be controlled. Development Plan • Control of the release of chemicals (includ- ing floatation chemicals) used in beneficiation The development plan defines the sequence and processes. nature of extraction operations and describes in • Minimization of the effects of subsidence by detail the methods to be used in closure and res- careful extraction methods in relation to sur- toration. At a minimum, the plan must address face uses. the following: • Control of methane, a greenhouse gas, to less than 1% by volume, to minimize the risk of • Removal and proper storage of topsoil. explosion in closed mines; recovery of meth- • Early restoration of worked-out areas and of ane where feasible. (When methane content is spoil heaps to minimize the extent of open above 25% by volume, it normally should be areas. recovered.) • Diversion and management of surface and • Development of restoration and revegeta- groundwater to minimize water pollution tion methods appropriate to the specific site problems. Simple treatment to reduce the dis- conditions. charge of suspended solids may also be nec- • Proper storage and handling of fuel and chemi- essary. (Treatment of saline groundwater may cals used on site, to avoid spills. be difficult.) • Identification and management of areas with Mine Closure and Restoration Plan high potential for AMD generation. • Minimization of AMD generation by reducing The plan should include reclamation of open pits, disturbed areas and isolating drainage streams waste piles, beneficiation tailings, sedimentation from contact with sulfur-bearing materials. basins, and abandoned mine, mill, and camp • Preparation of a water management plan for sites. Mine reclamation plans should incorporate operations and postclosure that includes the following measures: minimization of liquid wastes by methods such as recycling water from the tailings wash • Return of the land to conditions capable of plant. supporting prior land use, equivalent uses, or • Minimization of spillage losses by proper de- other environmentally acceptable uses sign and operation of coal transport and trans- • Use of overburden for backfill and of topsoil (or fer facilities. other plant growth medium) for reclamation 284 PROJECT GUIDELINES: INDUSTRY SECTOR GUIDELINES • Contouring of slopes to minimize erosion and from these levels must be described in the World runoff Bank Group project documentation. The emis- • Planting of native vegetation to prevent sions levels given here can be consistently erosion and encourage self-sustaining devel- achieved by well-designed, well-operated, and opment of a productive ecosystem on the re- well-maintained pollution control systems. claimed land The guidelines are expressed as concentrations • Management of postclosure AMD and benefi- to facilitate monitoring. Dilution of air emissions ciation tailings or effluents to achieve these guidelines is un- • Budgeting and scheduling of pre- and post- acceptable. abandonment reclamation activities. All of the maximum levels should be achieved for at least 95% of the time that the plant or unit Upon mine closure, all shaft openings and is operating, to be calculated as a proportion of mine adits should be sealed or secured. annual operating hours. There is a need to reserve money over the life of the mine to cover the costs associated with Air Emissions mine closure. The amount of money and the type of financing required will depend on a number Controls may be required on individual sources, of factors, such as the projected life of the mine, such as ventilation exhausts, if they have a sig- the nature of the operations, the complexity of nificant effect on ambient particulate levels. If environmental issues, the financial and environ- coal crushers or dryers are used, fabric filters or mental management capacity of the borrower or other systems should be used to recover coal and project sponsor, and the jurisdiction in which the reduce particulate emissions to levels below 50 mine is located. The mine reclamation and clo- milligrams per normal cubic meter (mg/Nm3). sure plan, the timing of its submission, and its financing should be discussed and agreed on Liquid Effluents with the borrower or sponsor as early as possible. Target Pollution Loads Settling ponds to catch stormwater and to reduce suspended solids should be provided for all ef- fluent before discharge from the site. Implementation of cleaner production processes Where treatment of AMD or other effluents is and pollution prevention measures can provide required, the effluent levels presented in Table 2 both economic and environmental benefits. The should be achieved during operation and after loads presented in Table 1 can be used as a guide mine closure. for pollution prevention purposes. The figures relate to each of the production processes before Ambient Noise the addition of pollution control measures. Emissions Guidelines Noise abatement measures should achieve either the levels given below or a maximum increase in Emissions levels for the design and operation of each project must be established through the en- Table 2. Acid Mine Drainage and Liquid vironmental assessment (EA) process, on the ba- Effluents from Coal Mining sis of country legislation and the Pollution Prevention (milligrams per liter, except for pH) and Abatement Handbook as applied to local con- Parameter Maximum value ditions. The emissions levels selected must be justified in the EA and acceptable to the World pH 6–9 a Bank Group.
Recommended publications
  • Table 9. Major U.S. Coal Mines, 2019
    Table 9. Major U.S. Coal Mines, 2020 Rank Mine Name / Operating Company Mine Type State Production (short tons) 1 North Antelope Rochelle Mine / Peabody Powder River Mining LLC Surface Wyoming 66,111,840 2 Black Thunder / Thunder Basin Coal Company LLC Surface Wyoming 50,188,766 3 Antelope Coal Mine / Navajo Transitional Energy Com Surface Wyoming 19,809,826 4 Freedom Mine / The Coteau Properties Company Surface North Dakota 12,592,297 5 Eagle Butte Mine / Eagle Specialty Materials LLC Surface Wyoming 12,303,698 6 Caballo Mine / Peabody Caballo Mining, LLC Surface Wyoming 11,626,318 7 Belle Ayr Mine / Eagle Specialty Materials LLC Surface Wyoming 11,174,953 8 Kosse Strip / Luminant Mining Company LLC Surface Texas 10,104,901 9 Cordero Rojo Mine / Navajo Transitional Energy Com Surface Wyoming 9,773,845 10 Buckskin Mine / Buckskin Mining Company Surface Wyoming 9,699,282 11 Spring Creek Coal Company / Navajo Transitional Energy Com Surface Montana 9,513,255 12 Rawhide Mine / Peabody Caballo Mining, LLC Surface Wyoming 9,494,090 13 River View Mine / River View Coal LLC Underground Kentucky 9,412,068 14 Marshall County Mine / Marshall County Coal Resources Underground West Virginia 8,854,604 15 Bailey Mine / Consol Pennsylvania Coal Company Underground Pennsylvania 8,668,477 16 Falkirk Mine / Falkirk Mining Company Surface North Dakota 7,261,161 17 Mc#1 Mine / M-Class Mining LLC Underground Illinois 7,196,444 18 Tunnel Ridge Mine / Tunnel Ridge, LLC Underground West Virginia 6,756,696 19 Lively Grove Mine / Prairie State Generating Company
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE GUIDE to Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water
    REFERENCE GUIDE to Treatment Technologies for Mining-Influenced Water March 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation EPA 542-R-14-001 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms and Abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 Notice and Disclaimer..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 9 Passive Technologies Technology: Anoxic Limestone Drains ........................................................................................ 11 Technology: Successive Alkalinity Producing Systems (SAPS).................................................. 16 Technology: Aluminator© ............................................................................................................ 19 Technology: Constructed Wetlands .............................................................................................. 23 Technology: Biochemical Reactors .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coal and Coal Mining in Washington
    State of Washington ARTHUR B. LANGLIE, Governor Department of Conservation and Development ED DAVIS , Director DIVISION OF MINES AND MINING SHELDON L. GLOVER, Supervisor • Report of Investigations No. 4 Coal and Coal Mining in Washington By STEPHEN H. GREEN OLYMPIA STA1'E PRINTING PL ANT 19'1 (' CONTENTS Page Foreword .. 3 Introduction . • . 5 Selected bibliography . 6 Historical . 7 Coal areas of the State. 8 :Northwestern Washington ..................................... 8 King County . 9 Pierce County . 10 Southwestern Washington ..................................... 11 Kittitas County .. ............ .. ........................... 11 Anthracite . 12 Whatcom County ............................ .................... 12 Lewis County ........ ................... ....................... 13 Coal production ..................................... .. ..... ........ 18 Coal mining methods.. 20 Coke industry ...... ·.... -· ................ , ......... : ................ 16 Conditions affecting mining.. 20 Carbonization and hydrogenation of coal. ............................... 17 Fuel briquets . 16 :New prospects and developments.. 41 Present status of the coal mining industry ............................... 24 Properties operating in 1943. 25 King County . 26 Kittitas County . 38 Lewis County . 36 Pierce County . 33 Thurston County . 35 Whatcom County .......................... ..... ................ 25 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Map showing principal coal areas of Washington ........ Facing 8 Figure 2. Graph of production 1860-1942, inclusive .
    [Show full text]
  • Health Impact Assessment of Coal and Clean Energy Options in Kentucky
    Health Impact Assessment of Coal and Clean Energy Options in Kentucky A Report from Kentucky Environmental Foundation By Elizabeth Walker, PhD Deborah Payne, MPH Acknowledgements The authors thankfully acknowledge the following experts for reviews and comments on drafts of this report: Carla Baumann, MSN, RN Philip Curd, M.D., MSPH Richard Futrell, PhD Michael Hendryx, PhD David Mannino, MD John Patterson, MD, MSPH Monica Unseld, PhD Any remaining errors are entirely our own. The authors also thank contributions of interviews carried out by students of Berea College’s Health in Appalachia course (HEA/APS 210), Fall 2010 and 2011. About Kentucky Environmental Foundation: The Kentucky Environmental Foundation (KEF) is a non-pro!t organization dedicated to securing solutions to environmental problems in a manner, which safeguards human health, promotes environmental justice, preserves ecological systems and encourages sustainability. Design and layout: Rob Gorstein Graphic Design, Inc. i Health Impact Assessment of Coal and Clean Energy Options in Kentucky Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................3 Health Impacts of Coal Mining ............................................................................................5 1. Surface mining ...........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Waste Water Quality Management in Iilawarra Coal Mines
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Coal Operators' Conference Sciences 1998 Study of Waste Water Quality Management in IIlawarra Coal Mines R. N. Singh University of Wollongong H. B. Dharmappa University of Wollongong Muttucumaru Sivakumar University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/coal Recommended Citation R. N. Singh, H. B. Dharmappa, and Muttucumaru Sivakumar, Study of Waste Water Quality Management in IIlawarra Coal Mines, in Naj Aziz and Bob Kininmonth (eds.), Proceedings of the 1998 Coal Operators' Conference, Mining Engineering, University of Wollongong, 18-20 February 2019 https://ro.uow.edu.au/coal/268 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Study of Waste Water Quality Management in IIlawarra Coal Mines ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with two case histories of wastewater quality management in underground coal mines in the I1lawarra region. The first investigation briefly presents an analysis of mine water discharge having an extremely high concentration of suspended solids and consistently high barium concentrations, averaging 14.4 mg/l Barium, over the sampling period. A laboratory study of chemical precipitation processes has indicated that about 91% of barium could be removed by using ferric sulphate and lime. On the basis of the information obtained from the environmental audit process an alternative water treatment and reuse system incorporating 51% reduction in the water consumption with 32% less off-site discharge has been suggested (Thomas, 1995). The second case history is concerned with the storm water management at a mine situated in the Illawarra escarpment where only 20% of the wastewater generated in the colliery is discharged off -site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Impacts from Coal Cradle to Grave: the Environmental Impacts from Coal © 2001, Photostogo © 2001, Photostogo
    Cradle to Grave: The Environmental Impacts from Coal Cradle to Grave: The Environmental Impacts from Coal © 2001, PhotosToGo © 2001, PhotosToGo Clean Air Task Force 77 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02110 June, 2001 Clean Air Task Force 77 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02110 Tel: (617) 292-0234 Fax: (617) 292-4933 CATF gratefully acknowledges support for this report from the following foundations: The Turner Foundation The John Merck Fund The Joyce Foundation The Heinz Endowments The Rockefeller Brothers Fund The Energy Foundation The Kapor Foundation Credits: Writer: Martha Keating, Clean Air Task Force Editing: Ellen Baum, Clean Air Task Force Amy Hennen, Izaak Walton League of America Design Editor: Bruce Hill, Clean Air Task Force Design: Jill Bock Design Printing: Spectrum Printing & Graphics, Inc. June, 2001 Cradle to Grave: The Environmental Impacts from Coal Cradle to Grave: The Environmental Impacts from Coal he electric power industry is health. Some are known to cause the largest toxic polluter in cancer, others impair reproduc- the country, and coal, which tion and the normal development Tis used to generate over half of of children, and still others the electricity produced in the damage the nervous and immune U.S., is the dirtiest of all fuels.1 systems. Many are also respira- From mining to coal cleaning, tory irritants that can worsen from transportation to electricity respiratory conditions such as generation to disposal, coal asthma. They are an environmen- © 2001, PhotosToGo releases numerous toxic pollut- tal concern because they ants into our air, our waters and onto our lands.2 Nation- damage ecosystems. Power plants also emit large ally, the cumulative impact of all of these effects is quantities of carbon dioxide (CO2), the “greenhouse gas” magnified by the enormous quantities of coal burned each largely responsible for climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 River Basin Management Plan
    2021 River Basin Management Plan Mine waters challenge Published: 22/10/2019 Contents 1. Summary .................................................................................................................. 1 2. Mine water pressures ............................................................................................... 3 3. Addressing the challenge ......................................................................................... 6 4. Future challenges and actions .................................................................................. 9 5. Case studies: abandoned metal mines ................................................................... 12 6. Choices ................................................................................................................... 17 7. Contacts and supporting information ...................................................................... 18 8. References ............................................................................................................. 18 1. Summary Mining played a major part in Britain’s rich industrial history, but this also led to thousands of abandoned mines left scattered across our landscape. Most of these mines closed well over 100 years ago but they still pollute our rivers, harm fish, river insects and ecosystems and can have an adverse impact on economic activity. Discharges from abandoned mines continue to pollute over 1,500km (3%) of rivers in England. Pollution from coal mines is easy to see, because the iron rich water they
    [Show full text]
  • Air Pollution Due to Opencast Coal Mining and It's Control in Indian Context M K Ghose • and S R Maj Ee Centre of Mining Environment
    Jou rn al of Scientific & Industrial Research Vol. 60, October 200 I, pp 786-797 Air Pollution due to Opencast Coal Mining and It's Control in Indian Context M K Ghose • and S R Maj ee Centre of Mining Environment. In dian School of Mines, Dhanb ad 826004, India Received: 29 Janu ary 200 I; accept ed : 29 June 200 I Open cast mining dominates th e coal production scenario in India. It creates more serious air pollution prob le m in the area. Coal producti on scenari o and its impact on air quality is descri bed. To maint ain th e energy demand in opencast min ing i~ growing at a phenomenon rate. There is no wcll-clefinccl method for assess in g the impact on air qu alit y clu e to minin g projects. An investi gati on is condu cted to evalu ate th e impact on ai r enviro nment due to opcncast coal mining. Emi ssion fac tor dat a arc utili zed for computati on of du st ge neration due to different mining ac ti viti es. Approach for the selec ti on of work zo ne and ambient air monitoring stations arc cl cscribccl. Work zone air qu alit y, ambient air qu alit y, and seasonal va riati ons arc di sc ussed. whi ch shows hi gh po llution potential clue to SPM. The statu s of air pollution clue to opencast mining is evaluated and its impac t on air environment is assessed. Characteristics SPM show a great concern to human hea lth .
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Finance Guide Updated July 2019
    EPA-400-D-09-001 Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Finance Guide Updated July 2019 Introduction such as the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Global methane emissions from the coal Implementation originally created financial mining sector can be reduced through markets and incentives to develop projects recovery and utilization projects that collect that reduce GHG emissions, and the California methane gas from coal mines for productive and Quebec Cap-and-Trade programs have use or through destruction when an economic expanded to include CMM offsets. More use is not feasible. recently, Article 6 of the Paris Agreement The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s provides a pathway for international (EPA’s) Coalbed Methane Outreach Program cooperation through markets and carbon (CMOP) is a voluntary program with the goal pricing associated with Nationally Determined of reducing methane emissions from coal Contributions. Third, multinational mining activities. Our mission is to promote collaborative initiatives such as the Global the profitable recovery and utilization of coal Methane Initiative (www.globalmethane.org) mine methane (CMM), a potent greenhouse have focused on overcoming policy, gas (GHG) that contributes to climate change regulatory, legal, and technical barriers that if emitted to the atmosphere. When collected inhibit project development. and used for energy, CMM is a valuable fuel Often, the critical barrier to developing CMM source. projects is securing financing. This is due, in CMOP estimates that more than 200 CMM part, to the lack of awareness of the sources projects exist worldwide. Many more project of finance and limited understanding of the opportunities exist in emerging market requirements to secure financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Particulate Matter (PM10) Related to Surface Coal Mining Operations in Appalachia
    Atmospheric Environment 54 (2012) 496e501 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Atmospheric Environment journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/atmosenv Short communication Characterization of particulate matter (PM10) related to surface coal mining operations in Appalachia Viney P. Aneja a,*, Aaron Isherwood b, Peter Morgan b a Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8208, USA b Sierra Club Environmental Law Program, San Francisco, CA 94105-3441, USA article info abstract Article history: This study investigates the environmental exposure of residents of a community in southwest Virginia to Received 20 June 2011 respirable concentrations of dust (PM-10 i.e. PM10) generated by trucks hauling coal from surface coal Received in revised form mining operations. The study site is representative of communities in southwest Virginia and other parts 13 February 2012 of Appalachia that are located in narrow hollows where homes are placed directly along roads that Accepted 15 February 2012 experience heavy coal truck traffic. Preliminary air sampling (Particulate Matter i.e. PM10) was conducted for a period of approximately Keywords: two weeks during early August 2008 in the unincorporated community of Roda, Virginia, at two locations Surface coal mining (about a mile apart along Roda Road (Route 685) in Wise County, Virginia). For the purposes of this study PM10 Elemental analysis (a combination of logistics, resource, and characterization of PM) we sited the PM samplers near the road Electron microscopy to ascertain the micro exposure from the road. The results revealed high levels of PM10 (the mean 3 3 Air toxic adjusted 24-h concentration at the Campbell Site 250.2 mgmÀ ( 135.0 mgmÀ ); and at the Willis 3 ¼ Æ 3 Site 144.8 60.0 mgmÀ ).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact of Methane Released from Coal Mines
    MATEC Web of Conferences 305, 00030 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202030500030 SESAM 2019 Environmental impact of methane released from coal mines Nicolae Ianc1*, Corneliu Boantă1, Ion Gherghe1, Cristian Tomescu1 1National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion – INSEMEX, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea Street, Petrosani, Hunedoara, Romania Abstract. Methane gas accompanying coal deposits was formed as a result of successive stages of the anaerobic process of vegetal material transformation into coal, at high temperatures and pressures, without external oxygen supply. During the metamorphism process, the content of C, H and O is modified, meaning an increase in carbon content, a decrease in hydrogen and oxygen, the nitrogen and sulphur content remaining constant. During this process, water and carbon dioxide is generated, the water being generated in the first transformation phases. Within the slow oxidation process, gas products result by using the oxygen content in plants, especially methane and carbon dioxide due to the fermentation stimulated by bacteria. Methane released into the atmosphere following the mining of coal have double ecological impact, participating in the destruction of the ozone layer and at the same time contributing to the enhancement of the greenhouse effect. At the same time, methane gas released into the atmosphere during coal mining may be used by mining operators as primary power resource for covering the power requirements of the mine or it can be used for commercial purposes. 1 Introduction The methane gas that accompanies the coal deposits was formed as a product in the successive stages of the process of anaerobic conversion of the vegetal material into coal at high temperatures and pressures, during the carbonization process, without oxygen supply from the outside.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-42 11.9 Western Surface Coal Mining
    Revision of Emission Factors for AP-42 Section 11.9 Western Surface Coal Mining Revised Final Report For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Factor and Inventory Group Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Attn: Ron Myers (MD-14) EPA Contract 68-D2-0159 Work Assignment No. 4-02 MRI Project No. 4604-02 September 1998 Revision of Emission Factors for AP-42 Section 11.9 Western Surface Coal Mining Revised Final Report For U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emission Factor and Inventory Group EPA Contract 68-D2-0159 Work Assignment No. 4-02 MRI Project No. 4604-02 September 1998 NOTICE The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-D2-0159 to Midwest Research Institute. It has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and has been approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. iii PREFACE This report was prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI) for the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under Contract No. 68-D2-0159, Work Assignment No.4-02. Mr. Ron Myers was the requester of the work. Approved for: MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE Roy Neulicht Program Manager Environmental Engineering Department Jeff Shular, Director Environmental Engineering Department July 1998 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Introduction ...................................................... 1 Section 2 Revision of AP-42 Section on Western Surface Coal Mining .................
    [Show full text]