M E Lb O U Rn E a U G M E N Ta Tio N P Ro G Ra M W a Ter R Ecyclin G O P Tio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

M E Lb O U Rn E a U G M E N Ta Tio N P Ro G Ra M W a Ter R Ecyclin G O P Tio Technical Report June 2007 Prepared by Capital Projects Division Department of Sustainability and Environment Water Recycling Options Melbourne Augmentation Program Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, June 2007 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2007 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 . Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne Printed by Classic Colour Copying, Melbourne. Printed on 100% Recycled paper ISBN 978-1-74152-968-5 For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Water Recycling Options 1.0 Context...........................................................................................1 2.0 Eastern Treatment Plant Upgrade...............................................2 2.1 Summary ..............................................................................2 2.2 Project overview ...................................................................2 Table contents of 2.2.1 Upgrade proposal and timelines..................................... 4 2.3 Opportunities for recycling of treated ETP water..................5 2.3.1 Volume of recycled water available from ETP................ 5 2.3.2 Classes of recycled water............................................... 6 2.3.3 Strategy for identifying recycling uses............................ 7 3.0 Eastern Water Recycling Proposal (EWRP) ...............................9 3.1 Summary ..............................................................................9 3.2 Project overview ...................................................................9 3.3 Project components ............................................................10 3.3.1 Recycled Water Scheme.............................................. 10 3.3.2 Released Water Scheme.............................................. 13 3.3.3 Recycled Water Health and Environmental Requirements............................................................................... 15 3.3.4 EWRP under the 100-year inflow scenario .................. 15 3.3.5 EWRP under reduced inflow scenarios........................ 16 3.3.6 Timelines ...................................................................... 17 3.4 Potential benefits of the EWRP proposal ...........................17 3.4.1 Securing water for cities, towns and industry for the future 17 3.4.2 Water for rivers ............................................................. 18 3.4.3 Improving the health of Lake Wellington ...................... 18 3.4.4 Significant reductions in ocean outfall discharges........ 18 3.4.5 Closure of the Gippsland Regional Outfall Sewer........ 19 3.4.6 Increased economic development in the Gippsland Region 19 3.5 Key issues for further investigation.....................................19 3.5.1 Industry requirements and agreements........................ 19 3.5.2 Water availability in an altered climate ......................... 20 3.5.3 Technical specifications................................................ 21 3.5.4 Environmental, social and economic issues................. 21 3.5.5 Procurement options .................................................... 22 4.0 Substitution of environmental flows: Yarra River ...................23 4.1 Summary ............................................................................23 4.2 Project overview .................................................................23 4.3 Project components ............................................................24 Water Recycling Options Table of contents (continued) 4.3.1 Further advanced treatment at ETP ............................. 24 4.3.2 Transfer infrastructure from ETP to Yarra River........... 26 4.3.3 Winneke Water Treatment Plant requirements ............ 27 4.3.4 Overall scheme............................................................. 28 4.3.5 Scheme capacity and potential additional water supply yield 29 4.3.6 Operational regimes ..................................................... 29 4.4 Project costs and timelines.................................................30 4.4.1 Estimated scheme costs............................................... 30 4.4.2 Capital costs ................................................................. 30 4.4.3 Operating costs ............................................................ 31 4.4.4 Preliminary estimated project timelines........................ 31 4.4.5 Contribution to water supply for Melbourne.................. 31 4.5 Environmental and social issues ........................................31 4.5.1 Pipeline route................................................................ 31 4.5.2 River discharge location ............................................... 32 4.5.3 Receiving water quality implications............................. 32 4.5.4 Environmental flow implications ................................... 35 4.5.5 Implications for the marine environment at Boags Rocks 36 4.5.6 Community concerns.................................................... 36 4.5.7 Public health ................................................................. 36 4.6 Key issues for further investigation.....................................37 5.0 Other options...............................................................................39 5.1 Increased commercial reuse of recycled water ..................39 5.2 Indirect potable reuse .........................................................39 6.0 Appendices..................................................................................41 Appendix 1: Pipeline route report: ETP to the Yarra River Appendix 2: Preliminary assessment of waterway health issues arising from the ‘ETP to Yarra’ water supply augmentation proposal Water Recycling Options 1.0 Context In response to the extended drought and potential for climate change to cause reduced inflows to water supply catchments, the Government has investigated options to deliver significant augmentations to Melbourne’s potable water supply. A new desalination plant will be constructed, and modernisation of irrigation systems in northern Victoria will provide for the transfer of water by pipe to Sugarloaf Reservoir. The Government has also committed to investigating a broad range of options for the use of recycled water, including from the Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP). This report sets out the proposal to upgrade the ETP, and summarises past and recent investigations into two significant opportunities to use high quality treated water from the ETP in order to free up additional potable supply to Melbourne: • the Eastern Water Recycling Proposal (EWRP), which would see recycled water sent to the Latrobe Valley for use by industry, substituting their current regional water supplies and releasing a proportion of these supplies for augmentation of Melbourne’s supply • adding recycled water to environmental flows in the Yarra River below Yering Gorge, allowing additional water to be harvested from the Yarra River into Sugarloaf Reservoir for conventional treatment for potable supply (the ‘ETP to Yarra’ option). Melbourne Water will upgrade the Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) by 2012 to a full- scale tertiary treatment facility. The ETP tertiary treatment facility will be capable of treating up to 780 million litres of wastewater per day, ensuring that the ETP can treat all normal and wet weather flows to a Class A recycled water standard. This facility will be the largest of its type in Australia, and one of the largest in the world. Class A recycled water is suitable and safe for a wide range of agricultural, industrial and non-potable domestic uses. With further treatment, the water would be suitable for an even wider range of uses, including further industrial, commercial and domestic uses and substitution of environmental flows. Providing recycled water to these uses would free up the potable water they currently take from the reticulated supply system. The recent investigations into the EWRP and ETP to Yarra option have included: • design (or update) of the system components required for each of the options to deliver the maximum amount of potable water to augment Melbourne’s water supply • evaluation of the options under different climate/inflow scenarios set out in the Victorian Water Plan • costing of the options in different climate/inflow scenarios • desktop review (or update) of the environmental, social and economic issues associated with each option • identification of the issues that would need to be addressed in any further business case evaluation on the options. This report firstly summarises the proposal to upgrade the ETP, then describes and evaluates the EWRP and ETP to Yarra options. Appendices contain more details on the proposals, including a technical report on the environmental health issues associated with substitution of environmental flows in the Yarra River. Water Recycling Options 2.0 Eastern Treatment Plant Upgrade 2.1 Summary The Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) will be upgraded by 2012 to tertiary standard,
Recommended publications
  • DUCK HUNTING in VICTORIA 2020 Background
    DUCK HUNTING IN VICTORIA 2020 Background The Wildlife (Game) Regulations 2012 provide for an annual duck season running from 3rd Saturday in March until the 2nd Monday in June in each year (80 days in 2020) and a 10 bird bag limit. Section 86 of the Wildlife Act 1975 enables the responsible Ministers to vary these arrangements. The Game Management Authority (GMA) is an independent statutory authority responsible for the regulation of game hunting in Victoria. Part of their statutory function is to make recommendations to the relevant Ministers (Agriculture and Environment) in relation to open and closed seasons, bag limits and declaring public and private land open or closed for hunting. A number of factors are reviewed each year to ensure duck hunting remains sustainable, including current and predicted environmental conditions such as habitat extent and duck population distribution, abundance and breeding. This review however, overlooks several reports and assessments which are intended for use in managing game and hunting which would offer a more complete picture of habitat, population, abundance and breeding, we will attempt to summarise some of these in this submission, these include: • 2019-20 Annual Waterfowl Quota Report to the Game Licensing Unit, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries • Assessment of Waterfowl Abundance and Wetland Condition in South- Eastern Australia, South Australian Department for Environment and Water • Victorian Summer waterbird Count, 2019, Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research As a key stakeholder representing 17,8011 members, Field & Game Australia Inc. (FGA) has been invited by GMA to participate in the Stakeholder Meeting and provide information to assist GMA brief the relevant Ministers, FGA thanks GMA for this opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water Corporation 1998/1999 Annual Report
    MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C ONTENTS 2 Chairman’s Report 4 Managing Director’s Overview 6 Business Performance Overview 10 Maximise Shareholder Value 18 Achieve Excellent Customer Service 22 Be a Leader in Environmental Management 28 Fulfil Our Community Obligations 34 Corporate Governance 38 Five Year Financial Summary 39 Financial Statements 33 Statement of Corporate Intent The birds illustrated on the front cover are the Great-billed Heron and the White Egret. MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 1 M ELBOURNE WATER C ORPORATION 1998/1999 A NNUAL R EPORT Melbourne Water is a statutory corporation wholly owned by the Government of Victoria. The responsible Minister is the Hon. Patrick McNamara, Minister for Agriculture and Resources. VISION To be a leader in urban water cycle management P URPOSE Melbourne Water exists to add value for its customers and the community by operating a successful commercial business which supplies safe water, treats sewage and removes stormwater at an acceptable cost and in an environmentally sensitive manner. VALUES Melbourne Water’s values determine its behaviour as an organisation. The values are innovation, cooperation, respect, enthusiasm, integrity and pride. They are a guide to employees on how they should conduct their activities. Through embracing and abiding by the values, employees demonstrate to others the principles by which Melbourne Water conducts its business. 1 MW AR1999 TextV3 for PDF 5/11/99 4:09 PM Page 2 C HAIRMAN’S REPORT During the year Melbourne Water produced a solid financial result and completed several major projects for the long-term benefit of our customers and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Microbial Pollution in Surface Waters and the Coastal Ocean Through a Program of Review, Field Experimentation and Numerical Modelling
    Dynamics of microbial pollution in aquatic systems Matthew Richard Hipsey B.Sc (Hons) (Environmental Science) M.Eng.Sc (Environmental Engineering) This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Adelaide School of Earth and Environmental Sciences May 2007 Microbial pollution in aquatic systems M.R. Hipsey Pg iii Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ...........................................................................................................................................xi Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... xvii Preface .................................................................................................................................................. xix Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 An Emerging Threat .............................................................................................................................3 Surrogates for Indicating Pathogen Threats.........................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents
    Lake Eildon Land and On-Water Management Plan 2012 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................3 3.5 Healthy Ecosystems ...........................................24 1. Objectives of the Plan ..........................................4 3.5.1 Native Flora and Fauna ............................24 2. Context .......................................................................4 3.5.2 Foreshore Vegetation Management .........25 3.5.3 Pest and Nuisance Plants ........................26 2.1 Lake Eildon Development ....................................4 3.5.4 Pest Animals .............................................27 2.2 Lake Eildon as a Water Supply ............................4 3.5.5 References ...............................................27 2.3 Storage Operations ..............................................5 2.4 Land Status ...........................................................5 3.6 Land Management ..............................................28 2.5 Legal Status ..........................................................5 3.6.1 Permits, Licences and Lease Arrangements ................................28 2.6 Study Area .............................................................5 3.6.2 Fire ............................................................29 3. A Plan for the Management 3.6.3 Foreshore Erosion ....................................30 of Lake Eildon ..........................................................5 3.6.4 Stream Bank Erosion ................................31 3.1 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Recreational Fishing Guide 2021
    FREE TARGET ONE MILLION ONE MILLION VICTORIANS FISHING #target1million VICTORIAN RECREATIONAL FISHING A GUIDE TO FISHING RULES AND PRACTICES 2021 GUIDE 2 Introduction 55 Waters with varying bag and size limits 2 (trout and salmon) 4 Message from the Minister 56 Trout and salmon regulations 5 About this guide 60 Year-round trout and salmon fisheries 6 Target One Million 61 Trout and salmon family fishing lakes 9 Marine and estuarine fishing 63 Spiny crays 10 Marine and estuarine scale fish 66 Yabbies 20 Sharks, skates and rays 68 Freshwater shrimp and mussels 23 Crabs INTRODUCTION 69 Freshwater fishing restrictions 24 Shrimps and prawns 70 Freshwater fishing equipment 26 Rock lobster 70 Using equipment in inland waters 30 Shellfish 74 Illegal fishing equipment 33 Squid, octopus and cuttlefish 74 Bait and berley 34 Molluscs 76 Recreational fishing licence 34 Other invertebrates 76 Licence information 35 Marine fishing equipment 78 Your fishing licence fees at work 36 Using equipment in marine waters 82 Recreational harvest food safety 40 Illegal fishing equipment 82 Food safety 40 Bait and berley 84 Responsible fishing behaviours 41 Waters closed to recreational fishing 85 Fishing definitions 41 Marine waters closed to recreational fishing 86 Recreational fishing water definitions 41 Aquaculture fisheries reserves 86 Water definitions 42 Victoria’s marine national parks 88 Regulation enforcement and sanctuaries 88 Fisheries officers 42 Boundary markers 89 Reporting illegal fishing 43 Restricted areas 89 Rule reminders 44 Intertidal zone
    [Show full text]
  • The Gippsland Lakes Fishery
    The Gippsland Lakes fishery An overview The Gippsland Lakes are a network of lakes, marshes and lagoons in east Gippsland, covering an area of about 354 square kilometres. The waterway is collectively fed by the Avon-Perry, Latrobe, Mitchell, Nicholson and Tambo rivers and a number of smaller creeks and comprises several large lakes including Lake Wellington, Lake King and Lake Victoria. The region supports a range of natural values important to fisheries resources and is home to several commercial and recreational fisheries. Fishing in the Lakes provides significant value to recreational and commercial fishers, consumers of commercially caught fish and the broader local community. Both sectors are economically important to the region. Commercial fishing in Gippsland Lakes Commercial fishing in Gippsland Lakes is authorised under a number of commercial fishing licences. Those that use nets to harvest fish include Gippsland Lakes Fishery Access Licences, Gippsland Lakes (Bait) Fishery Access Licences and Eel Fishery Access Licences. There are currently ten Gippsland Lakes Fishery Access Licence holders who use a range of methods (mostly mesh and haul seine nets) to harvest a range of species, ten Gippsland Lakes (Bait) Fishery Access Licence holders who use dip and seine nets (and other equipment) to harvest species such as anchovies, spider crabs, bass yabby and marine worms and two Eel Fishery Access Licence holders who use fyke nets to catch long and short finned eels. Commercial catch and value The annual catch of all species by commercial fishers in the Gippsland Lakes since the 1978/79 fishing season can be seen in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Coastal Awards for Excellence 2008
    1 coastlineEdition 43. ISSN 1329-0835 autumn update 2008 State Coordinator’s Message In this issue Matthew Fox Statewide Program Coordinator State Coordinator’s Message 1 I’d like to welcome you to Coastline Autumn Update; the first for me in the role of State Coordinator, Approach to diversity and the first in this new newsletter format. The new-look newsletter has been developed to better rewarded 1 inform those with an interest in Victoria’s coast. There will be an issue in autumn, winter and spring Keeping up with change 2 Victorian Coastal Awards and in summer, the usual Coastline magazine will be printed and distributed. In the interests of for Excellence 2008 2 reducing our environmental footprint, we have decided to distribute this newsletter electronically. Twitchers wanted 3 By doing so, we have already saved more than half a tonne of paper, as well as avoiding the few Coastal heroes 3 hundred kilograms of carbon emissions involved in the statewide transport process. We hope that you Rangers vegetation management workshop 3 find theCoastline Update both informative and useful, and we welcome your contributions. If you Coastal Fun 4 Kids 4 would like to contribute to the Update, please drop us a line or contact your local facilitator. Apollo Bay Music Festival cooler than ever 4 Evolution of estuary monitoring 4 Approach to diversity rewarded Venus Bay fox control project 5 The efforts of the Coast Action/Coastcare Easter by the Estuary 5 (CA/CC) team to build inclusiveness into its Grants available for volunteers 6 programs and projects, has been recognised Reporting on catchment health 6 with a DisAbility award from the Department of Coming Events 6 Coast Action/ Sustainability and Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Value of Water in Storage
    Melbourne School of Engineering Department of Infrastructure Engineering The economic value of water in storage 11th February 2018 Citation Western, Andrew W., Taylor, Nathan, Langford, John K., and Azmi, Mo, 2017. The economic value of water in storage. The University of Melbourne, Australia. Copyright © The University of Melbourne, 2017. To the extent permitted by law, all rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of The University of Melbourne. Contact Professor Andrew Western, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, 3010, Australia [email protected] Project Team The University of Melbourne Project team consisted of: • Professor Andrew Western, Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne; • Professor John Langford, Steering Committee Chair, University of Melbourne; and • Research Fellow, Nathan Taylor, University of Melbourne. Steering Committee The project was informed by the members of the Steering Committee consisting of: • Richard Smith; Business Planning and Regulation Manager; City West Water; • Udaya Kularathna; Team Leader Water Resource Assessment, Integrated Planning; Melbourne Water; • Bruce Rhodes, Manager Water Resources Management, Melbourne Water; • Ian Johnson; Manager Urban Water Policy; South East Water; • Dominic Keary; ESC Project Manager; Yarra Valley Water; and • Stephen, Sonnenberg, Manager Urban Water Security Policy, Department of Environment, Land, Water & Planning. The Steering Committee was Chaired by Professor John Langford, University of Melbourne. While this report was informed by the Steering Committee, the findings contained in the report are the responsibility of the Project Team and not the Steering Committee or the organisations they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • Melbourne Water's Key EPA Victoria Obligations
    Melbourne Water's Key EPA Victoria Obligations Sewage Transfer System Issue Regulatory Instrument Relevant SOO Required Standard Business response set out in« Key Activities over Water Plan Capital Expenditure ($M) 2009 Water Clause Period Plan Opex ($M) Environment Existing Obligations 2009 Water 2013 Water Plan Plan Spills Wet weather capacity EP Act, SEPP (Waters of New sewers to contain flows associated Sewerage System Review, Spills Northern Sewerage Project and Victoria) with at least one-in-five year rainfall Abatement Program commence Stage 3 of the Spill event. Existing sewers to be upgraded to Abatement Program. Metropolitan achieve containment through agreed Sewerage Strategy improvement plan - Northern sewerage project $192.2M Nil <$1M - Hawthorn main sewer upgrade $1.3M $14.1M <$1M - Kew North branch sewer upgrade $0.7M $7.2M <$1M - Ringwood South branch sewer $82.5M <$1M augmentation System failure As above Manage the sewerage system so that Sewerage System Review, Asset Renewals and maintenance programs BAU Nil spills due to system failure do not occur Management Plans - Melbourne Main Sewer $134.9M Nil <$1M - Mechanical & electrical renewals $31.7M Nil allocation - Werribee River Aqueduct $2.6M Nil <$1M Replacement Nil - Rehabilitation of Merri Creek / $5.8M <$1M Carlton main sewers - Significant civil assets renewals <$1M - North Yarra Main $2.2M duplication/relining $17.9M $21.4M Odour SEPP (Air Quality Management) EPA principles on offensive odours Odour Management Strategy as it Any investment arising from odour BAU relates to the Sewerage Transfer risk and benefit/cost assessments system - East Drop Structure odour control $3.8M Nil <$1M - Sewerage transfer network odour $0.3M Nil control Customer Existing Obligations 2009 Water 2013 Water Plan Plan Sewage quality EPA Licence, SEPP (Waters of SOO Part 5, Application of EPA Victoria Waste Contaminant Management Plans, WTP Review and implement Salt ~$1M Victoria), Bulk Service Trade Waste Hierarchy Principle.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. South East Coast (Victoria)
    5. South East Coast (Victoria) 5.1 Introduction ................................................... 2 5.5 Rivers, wetlands and groundwater ............... 19 5.2 Key data and information ............................... 3 5.6 Water for cities and towns............................ 28 5.3 Description of region ...................................... 5 5.7 Water for agriculture .................................... 37 5.4 Recent patterns in landscape water flows ...... 9 5. South East Coast (Vic) 5.1 Introduction This chapter examines water resources in the Surface water quality, which is important in any water South East Coast (Victoria) region in 2009–10 and resources assessment, is not addressed. At the time over recent decades. Seasonal variability and trends in of writing, suitable quality controlled and assured modelled water flows, stores and levels are considered surface water quality data from the Australian Water at the regional level and also in more detail at sites for Resources Information System (Bureau of Meteorology selected rivers, wetlands and aquifers. Information on 2011a) were not available. Groundwater and water water use is also provided for selected urban centres use are only partially addressed for the same reason. and irrigation areas. The chapter begins with an In future reports, these aspects will be dealt with overview of key data and information on water flows, more thoroughly as suitable data become stores and use in the region in recent times followed operationally available. by a brief description of the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Branch Newsletter – May 2019 Branch Meeting Notice
    ` Branch Newsletter – May 2019 Branch Meeting Notice WEDNESDAY JUNE 5, 2019 7.30 PM – 9.00 PM HARKAWAY HALL, KING ROAD, HARKAWAY Learn more about the history of Harkaway from guest speakers Find out more about the benefits of being a member of the National Trust Meet our new President, Tammy Lobato and our new Committee Enjoy discussion with friends over wine and nibbles ALL MEMBERS AND VISITORS ARE WELCOME There is ample parking at the Dalton Reserve, opposite the Hall RSVP by May 30 for catering purposes to National Trust shop at Pioneers Park on 9769 5653 or to Tammy Lobato 0408 722 380 Branch Trust News Beaconsfield Nature Conservation Reserve – Dam Refurbishment Project Do you know the Beaconsfield Nature Conservation Reserve? You may not, because it is a well hidden treasure more likely to be found in somewhere like the Warburton Ranges rather than our suburban growth corridor - https://goo.gl/maps/MFguY41BeNSKaY4U9 Construction of the historic Beaconsfield Reservoir, within the reserve commenced during World War 1, in order to provide an improved water supply for defence installations on the Mornington Peninsular. After World War 2, the reservoir became a source of water for factories opening up in the Dandenong area. The reservoir was decommissioned when the Cardinia Reservoir was constructed and the water authorities had no plans to re-open the facility as water quality could no longer be guaranteed. The Dam now needs to be refurbished to meet modern standards. This refurbishment provides an opportunity to sustain the ecological values of and add value to the Beaconsfield Nature Conservation Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Supply Options for Melbourne
    Submission to the Environment and Natural Resources Committee Inquiry into Melbourne’s Water Supply Water supply options for Melbourne An examination of costs and availabilities of new water supply sources for Melbourne and other urban areas in Victoria Alan Moran Director, Deregulation Unit, Institute of Public Affairs Institute of Public Affairs Occassional Paper, revised August 2008 Water supply options for Melbourne Summary greenfield developments. Recycling Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP) water appears to be prohibitively costly, while Melbourne’s water supply is suffering from a combination releasing treated water and substituting it for other sources of drought and a failure to build new storage facilities over is also expensive. Some variations of household rainwater the past 23 years when the population has increased by tanks rival the Wonthaggi desalination plant proposal in over 30 per cent. These matters may be aggravated by providing the most expensive solutions. Less expensive is long term climate change diminishing the precipitation to the government’s Sugarloaf approach, but this still entails the traditional sources in the Melbourne catchment. water costing two and a half times that from a new dam in The government policy of matching supply and the Melbourne catchment. demand has been, and largely remains, directed at The table below summarises the estimated costs measures that curtail demand; supply side measures and potential additional water supplies from the more have focused on tapping local sources, mainly through realistic options available. A major new Gippsland dam household water tanks. Additional supply sources have is the lowest cost option, though a river diversion into the been proposed over the past year or so.
    [Show full text]