DOCSLIB.ORG

Transurethral Alprostadil with MUSETM (Medicated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transurethral Alprostadil with MUSETM (Medicated International Journal of Impotence Research (1997) 9, 187±192 ß 1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0955-9930/97 $12.00 Transurethral Alprostadil with MUSETM (medicated urethral system for erection) vs intracavernous AlprostadilÐa comparative study in 103 patients with erectile dysfunction H Porst Urological Of®ce, Neuer Jungfernstieg 6a, 20354 Hamburg, Germany A comparative study in 103 unselected patients with erectile dysfunction between MUSETM up to 1000 mg and intracavernous Alprostadil (ProstavasinTM)upto20mg provided total response-rates of 43% (MUSETM) vs 70% (ProstavasinTM). Complete rigid erections were reached in 10% (MUSETM) vs 48% (ProstavasinTM). The average end-diastolic ¯ow values in the deep penile arteries ranged between 9.2±9.4 cm/s after MUSETM and 4.5±4.8 cm/s after i.c. Alprostadil con®rming the investigator's assessment, that in the vast majority of patients MUSETM were not able to induce a complete cavernous smooth muscle relaxation. In terms of side effects the reported penile pain/burning-rate after MUSETM was 31.4% compared to 10.6% after i.c. Alprostadil. In addition after MUSETM clinically relevant systemic side-effects like dizziness, sweating and hypotension occurred in 5.8% with syncope in 1%. No circulatory side-effects were encountered after i.c. Alprostadil. Urethral bleeding after MUSETM-application was observed in 4.8%. Due to the superior ef®cacy and lower side-effects self-injection therapy with Alprostadil remains the `Gold Standard' in the management of male impotence. MUSETM should be reserved for a subset of patients suffering from erectile dysfunction. TM Keywords: erectile dysfunction; Alprostadil; Prostaglandin E1; transurethral therapy; MUSE ; self-injection therapy Introduction adenylate cyclase with intracellular accumulation of cAMP and subsequent intracellular calcium decrease, direct stimulation of the maxi K (potas- Alprostadil was proposed for intracavernous injec- sium)-channels resulting in hyperpolarization, in- tion-therapy by Adaikan and Ishii, 1986 in Prague at hibition of the noradrenaline release via presynaptic the Second World Meeting on Impotence.1,2 The EP-receptors at the alpha1 adrenoceptors, resulting publications of its usefulness and safety in larger in a decrease of sympathetic (adrenergic) tone, and patient groups paved the way for a world-wide suppression of Angiotensin II secretion.7±10 Each of acceptance of Alprostadil in self-injection ther- these different pharmacological effects contributes apy.3,4 The high ef®cacy and low side-effect-rates to cavernous smooth muscle relaxation. with priapisms < 1% and ®brotic alterations about Irrespective of the administered vasoactive drug, 1% con®rmed in comprehensive retrospective lit- all published series with self-injection therapy of erature reviews prompted the Clinical Guidelines cavernous bodies reveal relatively high drop out Panel on Erectile Dysfunction of the American rates up to 40±50% in long-term follow up.5 This Urological Association to the statement that Alpros- disadvantage of self-injection therapy is at least tadil (PGE1) monotherapy should be preferred to partly due to the necessity of needle-application as other vasoactive drugs in self-injection therapy.5,6 many patients exhibit needle-phobia. Padma- The convincing ef®cacy of Alprostadil with Nathan et al, 1994 for the ®rst time introduced response-rates (complete rigid erections) of > 70% transurethral application of Alprostadil by means of in large series is attributed to several pharmacolo- MUSETM (Medicated Urethral System for Erection).11 gical properties of the drug: stimulation of the Due to the uncomplicated handling with a ready for use device and the needleless application MUSETM enjoyed great popularity in a very short time and Correspondence: Prof H Porst. was registered in the USA in December 1996. Received 1 August 1997; revised/accepted 22 September 1997 Presently only one comprehensive publication on Transurethral Alprostadil with MUSETM H Porst 188 this subject is available with a follow-up of three months.12 According to this publication, the inves- tigated patients developed erections, which were considered suf®cient for sexual intercourse by several investigators in 65.9% (996 out of 1511) after transurethral Alprostadil up to 1000 mg. With the of®cial approval followed by a tremendous increase of its use in erectile dysfunction critical statements on the promised ef®cacy of MUSETM could be heard which prompted us to compare ef®cacy and safety of transurethral (MUSETM) vs intracavernously injected Alprostadil in the diag- nostic evaluation of male impotence. Table 1 Intracavernous vs transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) Materials and methods One hundred and three consecutive patients (51.7 y mean) with chronic erectile dysfunction ( > 6 and all involved patients agreed to participate in the months) underwent a complete diagnostic evalua- trial. tion with patient's history, physical examination including penile palpation, determination of serum hormone-, (testosterone, prolactine) and glucose Results levels and pharmacotesting of cavernous bodies. In all patients an intracavernous pharmacotesting Ef®cacy (Table 1 and 2) with Alprostadil was performed up to dosages of 20 mg, in few cases up to 40 mg, respectively, and the Investigator's assessment: Complete rigid erec- results were compared with the outcome of transur- tion (ED-score 5) was obtained in 48% (49 out of ethral application of Alprostadil with MUSETM up to 103) after i.c. Alprostadil and in 10% (10 out of 103) the highest dosage of 1000 mg. All investigations, after MUSETM. Full tumescence with partial rigidity including the drug administrations, were performed (ED-Score 4) occurred in further 22% after i.c. and in by the author himself. The start doses were 500 mg 33% (34 out of 103) after transurethral Alprostadil. TM MUSE or 10 mg PGE1 i.c., respectively, with a wash These numbers indicate a total response rate of 70% out interval of at least 48 h. In responders the (72 out of 103) after i.c. Alprostadil compared to dosages were lowered to 250 mg MUSETM or 5 mg 43% (44 out of 103) after MUSETM. The dosages PGE1, and in non-responders increased to 1000 mg required for ®nal assessment of the highest erection TM MUSE or 20 m PGE1, respectively. Both investiga- score are presented in Table 2. This table empha- tions were combined with a duplex-sonography of sizes the observations that in the majority of patients the penile arteries with determination of the systolic (77%) the high MUSETMdosages of 500 mg (21%) or peak ¯ow velocities as well as the enddiastolic ¯ow in the deep penile arteries. The degree of erection was assessed according to an erection score of 1±5, as it was suggested in the MUSETM studies.12 Patients with an erection score 5 (full rigid erection) and 4 (full tumescence, partial rigidity) were considered as responders. The start of the trial either with intracavernous or with transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) was by chance. After each investigation the patients were observed for at least 60 min in the of®ce with blood pressure monitoring in a sitting position and the registration of possible adverse events. At the end of the study each patient was asked upon his estimation which drug was more effective and/or better-tolerated and which drug he would prefer for home use. All patients were informed on the objective of the trial that is to ®nd out the best tolerable and most effective pharmacological treatment for the individual patient Table 2 Intracavernous vs transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) Transurethral Alprostadil with MUSETM H Porst 189 Table 3 Intracavernous vs Transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) Table 5 Intracavernous vs Transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) 1000 mg (56%) were necessary for achievement of the highest ED-score. After i.c. Alprostadil in most patients dosages of 10 mg (28%) and 20 mg (65%) had to be applied in order to reach the highest erection quality. Patients' subjective assessments (Table 3) After termination of the comparative trial 37.9% of the patents estimated i.c. Alprostadil superior and 15.5% inferior to MUSETM. 46.6% of all patients indicated that they were not aware of great differ- Table 6 Intracavernous vs Transurethral Alprostadil (MUSETM) ences in terms of ef®cacy between the both methods with the majority of these patients falling under the non-responder category. than after i.c. Alprostadil (Table 6). Duplex-sonography ®ndings (Table 4 and 5) Systolic peak ¯ow velocities: Whereas after Side-Effects (Table 7) MUSETM-administration the systolic peak ¯ow velo- cities in the dorsal arteries were 55.6 cm/s (left side) and 53.4 cm/s (right side) were somewhat higher After i.c. Alprostadil 3.9% of the patients com- than after i.c. Alprostadil (49.7 and 49.0 cm/s), the plained of severe penile pain and 6.7% of slight ratio was conversely in terms of the deep penile painful sensations during full rigid erections. On the arteries with a slight advantage in favour of i.c. other hand after MUSETM-application in a total of Alprostadil (Table 4 and 5). Concerning the re- 31% painful or burning sensations in the penis or corded enddiastolic ¯ow, which represents an urethra were encountered with additional 2.9% indirect parameter for the degree of the complete- with severe testicle pain. Reddening of the varicose ness of cavernous smooth muscle relaxation, the veins of the lower limbs with simultaneous painful measured values were twice as high after MUSETM sensations occurred in 2.9%. Temporary urethral bleeding after MUSETM-application was observed in 4.8% (5 out of 103) and repeatedly occurred in four of these ®ve patients after further administration during the titration phase. Adverse events of general health conditions attributable to a blood pressure decay, beginning 8±15 min after application and lasting for about 10 min were observed in seven (6.8%) patients with one patient suffering from a short-term syncope.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Status of Local Penile Therapy
    International Journal of Impotence Research (2002) 14, Suppl 1, S70–S81 ß 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0955-9930/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/ijir Current status of local penile therapy F Montorsi1*, A Salonia1, M Zanoni1, P Pompa1, A Cestari1, G Guazzoni1, L Barbieri1 and P Rigatti1 1Department of Urology, University Vita e Salute – San Raffaele, Milan, Italy Guidelines for management of patients with erectile dysfunction indicate that intraurethral and intracavernosal injection therapies represent the second-line treatment available. Efficacy of intracavernosal injections seems superior to that of the intraurethral delivery of drugs, and this may explain the current larger diffusion of the former modality. Safety of these two therapeutic options is well established; however, the attrition rate with these approaches is significant and most patients eventually drop out of treatment. Newer agents with better efficacy-safety profiles and using user-friendly devices for drug administration may potentially increase the long-term satisfaction rate achieved with these therapies. Topical therapy has the potential to become a first- line treatment for erectile dysfunction because it acts locally and is easy to use. At this time, however, the crossing of the barrier caused by the penile skin and tunica albuginea has limited the efficacy of the drugs used. International Journal of Impotence Research (2002) 14, Suppl 1, S70–S81. DOI: 10.1038= sj=ijir=3900808 Keywords: erectile dysfunction; local penile therapy; topical therapy; alprostadil Introduction second patient category might be represented by those requesting a fast response, which cannot be obtained by sildenafil; however, sublingual apomor- Management of patients with erectile dysfunction phine is characterized by a fast onset of action and has been recently grouped into three different may represent an effective solution for these 1 levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Trimix Injection Information for Patients
    Individualized Medications to Fit Your Needs 5 0 3 BEXCELLENCEYOUCANRELYON TRIMIX INJECTION PHYSCIAN INFORMATION WWW.OLYMPIAPHARMACY.COM TriMix Injection Physician Information TriMix injections are an alternative to PDE5 Inhibitor tablets (Viagra®, Levitra®, Cialis®) and most commonly include the mixture of 3 drugs; phentolamine, papaverine and alprostadil. TriMix is especially useful when patients are unable to take PDE5 Inhibitors because they are taking nitrates, certain beta blockers, or experience severe side effects from the oral medications. Alternative to Tablets TriMix injections are an alternative to PDE5 Inhibitor tablets (Viagra®, Levitra®, Cialis®) and most commonly include the mixture of 3 drugs; phentolamine, papaverine and alprostadil. TriMix is especially useful when patients are unable to take PDE5 Inhibitors because they are taking nitrates, certain beta blockers, or experience severe side effects from the oral medications How It Works: An intracavernous injection, is the most effective non-surgical treatment for ED, according to the American Urologic Association. Injections into the penis, unlike oral medications, trigger an automatic erection in less than 5 minutes. TriMix is a mixture of three vasodilators that when injected, cause the corpus cavernosum to relax, expand and fill with blood, creating a powerful erection Dosage: The initial dose should be 0.1 cc Wait 3 days before increasing dosage. Increase by 0.025 cc until a satisfactory dose is reached. The maximum dose is 0.50 cc. Do not be discouraged by a poor result with the first few injections, as the initial dose has been kept low to avoid a prolonged erection Reversing The Test Dose: Phenylephrine is commonly used to reverse the effects of TriMix to prevent an erection lasting too long while the patient is learning their correct dosage.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Sexual Impotence: a Case Study in Evaluation and Treatment
    FAMILY PRACTICE GRAND ROUNDS Male Sexual Impotence: A Case Study in Evaluation and Treatment John G. Halvorsen, MD, MS, Craig Mommsen, MD, James A. Moriarty, MD, David Hunter, MD, Michael Metz, PhD, and Paul Lange, MD Minneapolis, Minnesota R. JOHN HALVORSEN {Assistant Professor, De­ cavernosa. There is also a very important suspensory lig­ D partment o f Family Practice and Community ament—a triangular structure attached at the base of the Health)-. Male sexual impotence is the inability to obtain penis and to the pubic arch blending with Buck’s fascia and sustain an erection adequate to permit satisfactory around the penis—that is responsible for forming the angle penetration and completion of sexual intercourse. Im­ of the erect penis. potence is defined as primary if erections have never oc­ The arterial supply to the penis flows from the aorta curred, and secondary if they have previously occurred through the common iliac, hypogastric, and internal pu­ but subsequently have ceased. The cause of sexual im­ dendal systems. The artery of the penis is a branch of the potence may be psychogenic, organic, or mixed. In the internal pudendal artery and has four branches. The first past, the common belief was that 90 percent of impotence branch, the artery to the bulb, supplies the corpus spon­ was psychological.1,2 Recent research indicates, however, giosum, the glans, and the bulb. The second branch is the that over one half of men with impotence suffer from an urethral artery. The artery of the penis then terminates organic disorder, although often there is considerable into the dorsal artery of the penis (which supplies the deep overlap between both psychological and organic causes.3,4 fascia, the penile skin, and the frenulum) and the deep or A knowledge of the anatomy of the penis and the com­ profunda branch (which supplies the corpora cavernosa plex physiology of erection is necessary to understand the on each side).
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCAVERJECT® STERILE POWDER (Alprostadil for Injection) 20 mcg Vials Prostaglandin Pfizer Canada Inc. Date of Revision: 17,300 Trans-Canada Highway June 01, 2016 Kirkland, Quebec H9J 2M5 Control No. 193414 ® TM Pharmacia Enterprises SARL Pfizer Canada Inc., Licensee Pfizer Canada Inc. 2016 PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCAVERJECT STERILE POWDER (Alprostadil for Injection) Prostaglandin ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Alprostadil is a prostaglandin with various pharmacological actions that include vasodilation and inhibition of platelet aggregation, inhibition of gastric secretion, stimulation of intestinal smooth muscle and stimulation of uterine smooth muscle. Alprostadil, when given to impotent men by intracavernous injection, induces erections within 5 to 20 minutes after administration. The duration of erection is dose-dependent. The mechanism of penile erection involves a complex series of neurovascular events. Alprostadil injected intracavernosally causes tumescence by increasing cavernous blood flow through relaxation of trabecular smooth muscle and dilation of cavernosal arteries. With regards to the action of alprostadil on penile structures, in most animal species tested, alprostadil had relaxant effects on retractor penis and corpus cavernosum urethrae in vitro. Alprostadil also relaxed isolated preparations of human corpus cavernosum and spongiosum as well as cavernous arterial segments previously contracted by either noradrenaline or PGF2α. In pigtail monkeys (Macaca nemestrina), alprostadil increased cavernous arterial blood flow in vivo. The degree and duration of cavernous smooth muscle relaxation in this animal model was dose-dependent. Other actions of PGE1 involve the cardiovascular system, central nervous system (CNS), autonomic nervous system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal system and hematopoietic system. Pharmacokinetics Absorption The absolute bioavailability of alprostadil following intracavernosal injection has not been determined.
    [Show full text]
  • (Medical and Mechanical) Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction
    130 SOP Conservative (Medical and Mechanical) Treatment of Erectile Dysfunctionjsm_12023 130..171 Hartmut Porst, MD,* Arthur Burnett, MD, MBA, FACS,† Gerald Brock, MD, FRCSC,‡ Hussein Ghanem, MD,§ Francois Giuliano, MD,¶ Sidney Glina, MD,** Wayne Hellstrom, MD, FACS,†† Antonio Martin-Morales, MD,‡‡ Andrea Salonia, MD,§§ Ira Sharlip, MD,¶¶ and the ISSM Standards Committee for Sexual Medicine *Private Urological/Andrological Practice, Hamburg, Germany; †The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; ‡Division of Urology, University of Western, ON, Canada; §Sexology & STDs, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; ¶Neuro-Urology-Andrology Unit, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, Garches, France; **Instituto H.Ellis, São Paulo, Brazil; ††Department of Urology, Section of Andrology and Male Infertility, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA; ‡‡Unidad Andrología, Servicio Urología Hospital, Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain; §§Department of Urology & Urological Reseach Institute (URI), Universiti Vita Saluta San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; ¶¶University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12023 ABSTRACT Introduction. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is the most frequently treated male sexual dysfunction worldwide. ED is a chronic condition that exerts a negative impact on male self-esteem and nearly all life domains including interper- sonal, family, and business relationships. Aim. The aim of this study
    [Show full text]
  • Isoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia Should Be a New Requirement In
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Isofurane inhalation anesthesia should be a new requirement in intracavernosal pressure Received: 21 December 2016 Accepted: 19 October 2017 detection—the gold standard of Published: xx xx xxxx erectile function assessment Jinhong Li1,2, Changjing Wu1, Fudong Fu1, Xuanhe You1, Liang Gao1,2, Romel Wazir3, Feng Qin1, Ping Han2 & Jiuhong Yuan1,2 Intracavernosal pressure (ICP) is gold standard for the detection of erectile function in animals, but no consensus has yet been achieved on what kind of anesthetic protocol should be applied. A total of 16 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into two groups. In group A, chloral hydrate was injected intraperitoneally. Rats in group B were induced in 5% isofurane for 3 min and then maintained in 1.0–1.5% isofurane. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR) and heart rate were monitored during all experiments. After ICP detection, tail vein and carotid artery blood were collected. The maximum ICP value, MAP and ICP/MAP ratio in group B was signifcantly higher than in that of group A. The RR in group A was lower than in that of group B, but the heart rate in group A was higher than in group B. There were no signifcant diferences in both pO2 and pCO2 between groups. While the data showed that animals in group A were relatively hypoxemic. Isofurane inhalation anesthesia in detection of erectile function could ofer a relatively more stable physical state than in that under the efect of chloral hydrate intraperitoneal anesthesia. Isofurane inhalation anesthesia is more suitable for ICP test.
    [Show full text]
  • Priapism After Epidural Or Spinal Anesthesia
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Research Day WMU Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine 2017 Priapism After Epidural or Spinal Anesthesia Sarah Khalil Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine Kelly Quesnelle Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine Jeffrey Friedman Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine Audrey Jensen Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine Duncan Polot Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/medicine_research_day Part of the Life Sciences Commons, and the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons WMU ScholarWorks Citation Khalil, Sarah; Quesnelle, Kelly; Friedman, Jeffrey; Jensen, Audrey; Polot, Duncan; and Spitler, Sydney, "Priapism After Epidural or Spinal Anesthesia" (2017). Research Day. 77. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/medicine_research_day/77 This Abstract is brought to you for free and open access by the WMU Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Day by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Sarah Khalil, Kelly Quesnelle, Jeffrey Friedman, Audrey Jensen, Duncan Polot, and Sydney Spitler This abstract is available at ScholarWorks at WMU: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/medicine_research_day/77 Priapism After Epidural and
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Talk About ED
    LET’S TALK ABOUT ED Get the facts. And get back to your life. This content is intended for patient counseling purposes only. This content is for informational/educational purposes and is not intended to treat or diagnose any disease or person. No claims are made as to the safety or eicacy of mentioned preparations. The compounded medications featured in this piece have been prescribed and administered by physicians who work with Wedgewood Pharmacy. You are encouraged to speak with your health care provider as to the appropriate use of any medication. TELL ED TO TAKE A HIKE 2 Let’s Talk About ED You’re not alone. A lot of guys know ED. Nearly More than % 30million 50 men have erectile of men between the ages dysfunction (ED) in the of 40 and 70 experience United States. it to some degree1. The bottom line is this – you’re not alone, and you don’t have to go it alone. This guide focuses on a treatment option prescribed for erectile dysfunction, penile self-injection medications, also known as intracavernosal injections. If you have any questions after reading this guide, bring them to your doctor’s attention. Don’t let ED be the boss of you. It’s natural to feel some anxiety about erectile dysfunction. But ED is a medical condition that can be treated – and treatment can result in signiicantly improved quality of life2 for both you and your partner. Many men report that enhancing or even saving a relationship, enjoying a satisfying sex life and regaining conidence far outweigh any anxieties about pursuing treatment – it’s well worth it.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Product Characteristics
    SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT <Product name>25 micrograms / 2 mg solution for injection 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION <Product name> 25 micrograms / 2 mg: 1 dose (ampoule 0.35 ml) contains 25 micrograms of aviptadil and 2 mg of phentolamine mesilate. Excipients with known effect: This medicinal product contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per dose, i.e. essentially ‘sodium- free’. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Solution for injection. Appearance: Colorless to pale yellow solution. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications <Product name> is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males due to neurogenic, vasculogenic, psychogenic, or mixed aetiology. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Posology <Product name> 25 micrograms / 2 mg. The injection should provide the patient with an erection that is satisfactory for sexual intercourse. It is recommended that the duration of the erection does not exceed one hour. Injection frequency should not exceed once daily or 3 times weekly. Paediatric population: <Product name> is not recommended in children. Elderly: No formal studies have been performed in patients above 75 years of age. Impaired renal or hepatic function: No formal studies have been performed in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function. Method of administration The ampoule can be brought to room temperature before use, or it can be used directly from the refrigerator (see section 6.6). The intracavernosal injection must be done under sterile conditions. <Product name> should be administered by direct intracavernous injection.
    [Show full text]
  • Caverjecttm (Alprostadil)
    Pfizer Confidential Disclaimer While these labels are the most current Drug Control Authority (DCA) approved versions of content, these are not necessarily reflective of final printed labeling currently in distribution LPD Title : ALPROSTADIL LPD Date : 14 December 2016 Country : Malaysia Ref. Doc. : UK SmPC Dated November 2016 and UK PIL Dated March 2016 Reason : Addition of text regarding needle breakage to section 4.4 special warnings and precautions for use. To update the storage condition to “Store below 30°C” and section 6.5. Remove 5mcg and 10mcg SKU as product no longer registered 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT CAVERJECTTM (ALPROSTADIL) 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION CAVERJECT™ 20 μg Each powder vial contains: Alprostadil 20 μg – Lactose monohydrate - Sodium citrate - α-cyclodextrine - Hydrochloric acid - Sodium hydroxide. Each diluent syringe (1 ml) contains: Benzyl alcohol 9 mg - Water for injection. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Pharmaceutical form after reconstitution: injectable solution. Way of administration: intracavernosal. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS Distribution 4.1 Therapeutic Indication Alprostadil is indicated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males due to neurogenic, vasculogenic, psychogenic or mixed aetiology. Alprostadil may be a useful adjunct to other diagnostic tests in the diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. For 4.2 Posology and Method of Administration Alprostadil is administered by direct intracavernous injection. A half inch, 27 to 30 gauge needle is generally recommended. The dose of alprostadil should be individualised for each patient by careful titration under supervision by a physician. The intracavernosal injection must be done under sterile conditions. The site of injection is usually along the dorsolateral aspect of the proximal third of the penis.
    [Show full text]
  • Intracavernosal Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
    International Journal of Impotence Research (2003) 15, 26–37 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0955-9930/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/ijir Intracavernosal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection and adeno-associated virus-mediated VEGF gene therapy prevent and reverse venogenic erectile dysfunction in rats RS Rogers1, TM Graziottin1, C-S Lin1, YW Kan2 and TF Lue1* 1Knuppe Molecular Urology Laboratory, Department of Urology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA; and 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA Penile veno-occlusive dysfunction (venogenic erectile dysfunction) is a common cause of erectile dysfunction (ED). We investigated whether vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) can be used to prevent and reverse venogenic ED in a rat model. Pharmacological cavernosometry was developed and validated using adult male rats with either arteriogenic or venogenic ED. Castrated animals were treated with intracavernous VEGF as either a recombinant protein (C+VEGF) or adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated VEGF gene therapy (C+VEGF gene) in an attempt to prevent the development of venogenic ED. Other animal groups received testosterone replacement (C+testosterone) or intracavernous AAV-LacZ gene (C+LacZ). Animals with documented venogenic ED were treated with intracavernous VEGF in an attempt to reverse their ED. Functional analysis (pharmacological infusion cavernosometry) was performed following treatment. Penile specimens were harvested for immunohistochemistry and electron microscopic evaluation. Castrated rats showed a decrease in papaverine-induced intracavernous pressure and an increase in maintenance and drop rates during pharmacological cavernosometry. These changes were prevented by systemic testosterone and intracavernous VEGF or AAV-VEGF therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Options for Male Erectile Dysfunction
    MTA98-016 I. Appendix 9: Intracavernous Injections for Erectile Dysfunction (ED) A. RCTs only, single-dose studies Study Name Drugs and Doses Study Design, Duration and Size Participants and Etiology of Impotence Outcomes Adverse Events Linet (1996) Alprostadil (PGE1) 2.5 mg, 5 Multi-center, randomized, double Inclusions: RigiScan response defined as > 70% DOSE-RESPONSE mg, 10 mg, 20 mg or placebo. blind, placebo-controlled, single fixed ED of vasculogenic, neurogenic, psychogenic rigidity at tip or base of penis lasting > PGE1 (all doses): dose, parallel group. Dose or mixed origin; duration of ED > 4 months. 10 consecutive minutes. Clinical Penile pain 23% administered in clinic by researcher. Exclusions: response defined as penile rigidity Priapism 1% penile deformity; history of priapism; sickle-cell sufficient for intercourse as assessed by Prolonged erection 3% Overall N=296 (100% follow-up) trait; recent major illness; uncontrolled diabetes researcher palpation. No response to Placebo: MDRC Technology AssessmentProgram - Placebo n=59 or hypertension; major psychiatric disorder; placebo. For both outcomes the No data given PGE1 2.5 mg n=57 infection with HIV or “other transmittable differences between each dose of PGE1 PGE1 5 mg n=60 disease”; smoking > 40 cigs/day; endocrine and placebo were statistically significant PGE1 10 mg n=62 etiology of ED. (p<0.01). There was a statistically PGE1 20 mg n=58 Demographics: significant dose-response relationship Ages 21 - 74 (mean 54) for clinical response (p<0.001) but not Etiology of ED: RigiScan response. Vascular 44% Psychogenic 14% Neurogenic 13% Mixed 29% Previous therapy for ED: 2% had prior injection treatment Colli (1996) PGE1 5 mg, 10 mg or placebo.
    [Show full text]