Rosser Reeves from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rosser Reeves from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Rosser Reeves From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Rosser Reeves (1910–24 January 1984) was a hugely successful American advertising executive and pioneer of television advertising. He believed the purpose of advertising is to sell. He insisted that an advertisement or commercial should show off the value of a product, not the cleverness of a copywriter. His most typical ad is probably that for Anacin, a headache medicine. The ad was considered grating and annoying by almost all viewers but it was remarkably successful, tripling the product's sales. In 7 years the 59-second commercial made more money than the movie Gone With The Wind had in a quarter-century. Reeves generated millions for his clients, the Ted Bates agency where he rose to chairman (existing today as Bates 141. The AMC program, Mad Men, uses Reeves as the model for the professional accomplishments of the series' protagonist, Don Draper (Jon Hamm). His ads were focused around what he called the unique selling proposition, the one reason the product needed to be bought or was better than its competitors. These often took the form of slogans — Reeves oversaw the introduction of dozens, some that still exist to this day, such as M&M's "melt in your mouth, not in your hand." He argued that advertising campaigns should be unchanging with a single slogan for each product. His commercials for Bic pens, Minute Maid orange juice, M&M candies, Colgate toothpaste and other products used similar methods, often making dramatic demonstrations. Reeves pointed out that to work, advertising had to be honest. He insisted the product being sold actually be superior, and argued that no amount of advertising could move inferior goods. He also disagreed that advertising was able to create demand where it did not exist. Successful advertising for a flawed product would only increase the number of people who tried the product and became dissatisfied with it. If advertising is effective enough and a product flawed enough, the advertising will accelerate the destruction of the brand. Similarly, Reeves believed it was a waste of money to claim uniqueness that doesn't exist, because consumers will soon find out, and they won't come back to the brand. This is important because historically fortunes are made from repeat business. Money would be better spent building some kind of meaningful advantage into a product before launching a costly advertising campaign to promote it. Reeves advised clients to be wary of brand image advertising which is less likely to be successful than his claim-based strategy. This is because when communication relies on an image, the claim is unarticulated. An image can almost always be interpreted different ways, many if not most of which won't do a product any good. The message that a viewer takes away from an image is often very different than what the advertiser had intended. Or to put it another way: practically every product has a number of benefits that might be claimed. Commonly one of the benefits is more popular than the others, even more popular than the others combined. Therefore, it's imperative to do everything to make people understand the most important benefit, to achieve credibility and to avoid distractions. The aim is to have as high a percentage of people as possible take out of an advertisement what the advertiser intends to put into it. This is most likely to be achieved if a claim is articulated and proven with credible evidence—in a brief commercial, some kind of dramatic demonstration. Reeves expressed his views in his 1961 book, Reality in Advertising (Knopf). An interview with Reeves was included in The Art of Writing Advertising (1965). His greatest contributions were to express more clearly than anyone else the philosophy of a claim and to show how the philosophy could be applied to commercials that involve severe time constraints. Reeves is also notable for creating Dwight Eisenhower's presidential ads for the 1952 election. He packaged Eisenhower as a forthright, strong, yet friendly leader. The commercials all included a regular person asking a question to the upper right of the screen. They would cut to Eisenhower, not wearing glasses to look stronger, looking to the lower left and then turning to the camera and responding. They were created by letting Eisenhower speak for a number of hours. Then questions were crafted later that best fit his answers. In the 1960s Reeves' techniques began to fail. Consumers became more savvy and learnt to tune out uninteresting commercials, and within the advertising industry itself the Creative Revolution (exemplified by Bill Bernbach's "Think Small" campaign for the Volkswagen Beetle), which rejected many of his precepts, began. At age 55 Reeves retired. He declared that he had always planned to retire at that age, but many felt it was because of the decline in his influence. Reeves did not shy from questionable ethics, including using doctors to sell cigarettes. He came out of retirement in 1967 to form the Tiderock Corporation, which he described as a "think tank" for corporate business. [1] One of its projects was a promotion in 1968 of a pro-smoking article by Stanley Frank published in True magazine. The promotion was paid for by the Tobacco Institute, who also paid Frank to write the article. [2] [edit] Notes Reeves also wrote a well received novel, Popo, (Knopff Press) about a poet who leaves a life of material wealth to move to Greeenwich Village in New York City, to pursue his poetry, and also wrote The 99 Critical Shots in Pool to explain Euclid and Sir Issac Newtons' geometric proofs. Born the son of Baptist Preacher in Virginia, he briefly attended The University of Virginia until he was expelled for drunkenly crashing a friends motor car during the prohibition era. Luckily he had just won 100 hundred dollars as a prize for a state wide chemistry contest that served as his final exam for first year Chem 101. While other students wrote novel chemical fourmulae as their submission, Reeves, not knowing anything about chemistry having spent the semester drinking, dancing and gambling, submitted an essay titled " Better Living Through Chemistry" He would later use this title for DuPont campaign. The 100 Dollars was enough money to move to Richmond where he was hired at a new bank that was hiring young contest winners. Finding that he was horrible at accounting but verbally gifted he began writing advertisements. He soon moved to New York City to found Ted Bates & Co with Ted Bates. .
Recommended publications
  • David Ogilvy Versus Rosser Reeves and Their “Competing” Advertising Philosophies: the Real Story
    CHARM 2007 David Ogilvy versus Rosser Reeves and their “Competing” Advertising Philosophies: The Real Story Daniel Marshall Haygood, University of Tennessee - Knoxville, USA But were their advertising philosophies really that David Ogilvy and Rosser Reeves were legends in the different? Were they truly intense rivals? This paper looks making when their advertising philosophies collided in at the real relationship of these two advertising titans and American popular culture and the marketing and the differences in their philosophies, both real and advertising communities during the late 1950s and 1960s. imagined, revealing never before published material of the According to the industry press, Reeves’ “hard sell” two men and highlighting interesting and surprising bits of approach and Ogilvy’s “soft sell” approach supposedly marketing and advertising history. were vastly different, and the men were portrayed as fierce, even hated, rivals. Using primary research from two Ogilvy and Reeves archives, this research uncovers the true nature of the relationship between these two advertising icons and their Just who were these two men at the center of the debate beliefs about any differences in their advertising about how advertising should be created and how it should philosophies and creative work. Personal letters, internal work? Certainly, both Ogilvy and Reeves could be agency memos, and various business documents reveal considered renaissance men. They were well read, surprising and never before published findings about articulate, enjoyed good food and fine drink, had a range of Reeves and Ogilvy’s long and lengthy friendship, family hobbies and interests, and traveled extensively overseas. ties, cooperative working relationship, their conflicts, and Both took great pride in their writing skills and often the common, solid foundation of their advertising claimed that their only professional desire was to be good philosophies.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality-In-Advertising.Pdf
    Reality In Advertising By Rosser Reeves Reality in Advertising by Rosser Reeves Rarely has a book about advertising created such a commotion as this brilliant account of the principles of successful advertising. Published in 1961, Reality in Advertising was listed for weeks on the general best-seller lists, and is today acknowledged to be advertising's greatest classic. It has been translated into twelve languages — French, Japanese, Spanish, Dutch, German, Italian, Portuguese, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Finnish, Hebrew—and has been published in twenty-one separate editions in fifteen countries. Leading business executives, and the advertising cognoscenti, hail it as “the best book for professionals that has ever come out of Madison Avenue.” Rosser Reeves says: “'The book attempts to formulate certain theories of advertising, many quite new, and all based on 30 years of intensive research.” These theories, whose value has been proved in the marketplace, all revolve around the central concept that success in selling a product is the key criterion of advertising. In the course of explaining his own hard-headed approach, Mr. Reeves shows why the ad campaigns for many products are just so much money poured down the drain. He has some delightfully devastating things to say about advertising's misguided men: the “aesthetes” and the “puffers” who put art and technique ahead of' the client's sales. But even more important is the thoroughness and clarity with which he explains many of the mysteries of how to write advertising that produces these sales. Here, in short, is a concise, forcefully written guide that has been called “a ‘Rosetta Stone’ for the advertising business”—an essential book for anyone who works in advertising, uses advertising extensively, or simply wants to know how it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida State University Libraries
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2019 Empire of Direct Mail: Media, Fundraising, aTankahdito C Morinyamsaervative Political Consultants Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES EMPIRE OF DIRECT MAIL: MEDIA, FUNDRAISING, AND CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL CONSULTANTS By TAKAHITO MORIYAMA A Dissertation submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2019 Takahito Moriyama defended this dissertation on March 8, 2019. The members of the supervisory committee were: Guenter Kurt Piehler Professor Directing Dissertation Brad T. Gomez University Representative Jennifer L. Koslow Committee Member Suzanne M. Sinke Committee Member Michael Creswell Committee Member Michael McVicar Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1 Chapter One: The Rise of Political Consultants in the 1950s ........................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Advertising: the Production of Relationships in Historical Review Timothy De Waal Malefyt
    Writing Advertising: the Production of Relationships in Historical Review Timothy de Waal Malefyt Abstract Page 1 of 21 This article examines a range of writings on advertising. It shows that JBA 1 (2): 218-239 advertising has been written about as instrumental to an emerging Autumn 2012 capitalistic market, touted as a flamboyant lifestyle in autobiographical tales of charismatic advertising leaders, depicted as a coercive tool of © The Author(s) 2012 manipulation for creating false desires in consumers, and analyzed for ISSN 2245-4217 its complex social and political relations among its internal divisions and www.cbs.dk/jba suppliers. I argue that the many ways advertising is written about reveal an ever-changing structural alignment within advertising itself, in what Pierre Bourdieu (1993) calls a field of strategic relations and possibles. In this, advertising, as well as the writing about advertising, is shown from a shifting ‘production of relations’ relative to economic, political, social and self-intended issues. The article concludes with possible future directions that writings on advertising will take. Keywords Advertising, historical perspective, anthropology, consumption, strategic relations De Waal Malefyt/ Writing Advertising Introduction What is advertising? What are its products and its effects on intended and unintended others? How do we look at the business of what it is and does, and why it exists? Various writers over the years have vetted these questions to celebrate, admire, vilify or puzzle over what advertising provides society in general, and consumers in particular. Advertising has been written about as instrumental to an emerging capitalistic market, touted as a flamboyant lifestyle in autobiographical tales of charismatic advertising leaders, depicted as a coercive tool of manipulation for creating false desires in consumers, and analyzed for its complex social and political relations among its internal divisions and suppliers.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Scholar Volume
    University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Oshkosh Scholar Volume VII, 2012 Copyright © 2012 University of Wisconsin Board of Regents All rights reserved. No part of this journal may be reproduced in any form without the permission of University of Wisconsin Oshkosh. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh Scholar, Volume VII, December 2012. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Office of Grants and Faculty Development 800 Algoma Blvd. Oshkosh, WI 54901 (920) 424-3215 www.uwosh.edu/grants If you are interested in submitting a manuscript to Oshkosh Scholar, please see the guidelines at www.uwosh.edu/oshkoshscholar Preface Welcome to the seventh volume of Oshkosh Scholar, the undergraduate research journal of UW Oshkosh. This summer the editorial team was thrilled to discover that students submitted 34 essays for consideration. The Selection Committee reasoned that with so many articles to consider they could use the highest standards of rigor, and ultimately decided upon 11 final essays. These numbers mark this year with the highest submission sample and the lowest acceptance rate. We are extremely proud of this volume and hope you will agree that it showcases the best of undergraduate research and writing. The first section, “Art and the Imagination,” delves into the creative realm with essays about folklore, advertising, and music. Jackie Morrow explores both the original Cinderella tale and its modern Jewish version through the lens of feminist theory. The rise of an ad man felled by the cultural revolution of the 1960s is chronicled by Lance Spaude. Jordan King thoughtfully questions the authenticity of the popular folk group The Kingston Trio. Taken together, these three essays help us examine how our reality is filtered through artistry.
    [Show full text]