DOCSLIB.ORG

Crop Rotation on Organic Farms a PLANNING MANUAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crop Rotation on Organic Farms a PLANNING MANUAL Crop Rotation on Organic Farms A PLANNING MANUAL Charles L. Mohler & Sue Ellen Johnson, editors Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) Plant and Life Sciences Publishing (PALS) CROP ROTATION ON ORGANIC FARMS a planning manual CHARLES L. MOHLER AND SUE ELLEN JOHNSON, EDITORS Published by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program. SARE is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Deparment of Agriculture. Formerly published by Plant and Life Sciences Publishing (PALS). NRAES-177 Published July 2009 (NRAES-177) Reprinted 2020 This book was first published in 2009 by the Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES). As of 2020 it is published by the Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) program. SARE is supported by the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture under award No. 2019-38640-29881. Learn more about NRAES and SARE on pages 155-156. ISBN 978-1-933395-21-0 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Crop rotation on organic farms : a planning manual / Charles L. Mohler and Sue Ellen Johnson, editors. p. cm. -- (Cooperative Extension NRAES ; 177) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-933395-21-0 1. Crop rotation--Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Organic farming--Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Mohler, Charles L., date II. Johnson, Sue Ellen, date III. Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service. Cooperative Extension. IV. Series: NRAES (Series) ; 177. S603.C756 2009 631.5’82--dc22 200901605 Disclaimer The SARE program provides information to everyone, without regard to race, religion, national origin, sex, age, disability, familial or veteran status. Every effort has been made to make this publication as complete and as accurate as possible. It is only a guide, however, and should be used in conjunction with other information sources. The editors/authors and publisher disclaim any liability, loss or risk, personal or otherwise, which is incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly, of the use and application of any if the contents of this publication. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the USDA or SARE. Ordering information For online orders visit www.sare.org/webstore. Call (301) 779-1007 to order by phone with credit card payment. To pay by check or purchase order, make payable to Sustainable Agriculture Publications and send to: SARE Outreach Publications c/o International Fulfillment Corporation 3570 Bladensburg Rd. Brentwood, MD 20722 Cost: • $24 for orders of 1-9 books • $18 for 10-24 books (a 25% discount) • $12 for 25 or more books (a 50% discount) Shipping: • $6.95 for first book (within the United States). Add $2 s/h for each additional book—up to nine books—shipped within the United States. • For s/h on orders of 10 or more books, call (301) 779-1007 or visit www.sare.org/WebStore. International orders: Call (301) 779-1007 or visit www.sare.org/WebStore. ii CONTENTS Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………….…………………………v About the Authors……………………………………………………………………………..………………………...vi Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………………..…………….…………………1 Charles L. Mohler How This Manual Was Constructed……………………….…………………………………….…………2 How to Use This Manual………………………………………………………………………………………2 Chapter 2: How Expert Organic Farmers Manage Crop Rotations……………………………………3 Sue Ellen Johnson and Eric Toensmeier Why Rotate Crops?……………………………………………………………………………………………3 Basics of Crop Rotation………………………………………………………………………………………5 Crop Rotation and Farm Management………………………….………….……………………………6 The NEON “Managing a Crop Rotation System” Chart……….………………………………………9 Key Responsibilities and Related Tasks in the Chart………………………………………………...10 Chapter 3: Physical and Biological Processes in Crop Rotation………………………….………....…21 What This Chapter Is About ……………………………………………………………....………………21 Charles L. Mohler Crop Rotation and Soil Tilth………………………………………………………..…………………....…23 Harold van Es Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Fertility and Plant Nutrition………….………………..…………...…27 Anusuya Rangarajan Managing Plant Diseases with Crop Rotation……………………………………………………....…32 Margaret Tuttle McGrath Management of Insect Pests with Crop Rotation and Field Layout……………..………………41 Kimberly A. Stoner The Role of Crop Rotation in Weed Management………………………….………..………….…..44 Charles L. Mohler Chapter 4: Crop Sequences from Expert Farmers’ Fields……………………………….....……..……47 Sue Ellen Johnson Reading the “Real Fields on Real Farms” Tables………………………………………...……………47 Observation on the Sample Sequences……………………………………………..……....…………56 Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………...…………57 iii Chapter 5: A Crop Rotation Planning Procedure……………………….…………………..……………58 Charles L. Mohler Tips for Sequencing Crops……………………………………………………………………....…….……59 A Complete, Step-by-Step Rotation Planning Guide……………………………………..…………69 A More Complex Example: Summer Acres Vegetable Farm………………………………………83 Chapter 6: Crop Rotation during the Transition from Conventional to Organic Agriculture………………………………………..……………………..………91 Charles L. Mohler Transition from Old Sod to Vegetable Production……………………………………………....……91 Transition from Conventional Cropping on a Farm with Forages……………………………...…92 Transition to Cash Grain or Vegetables on a Farm without Forages…………….………….…...93 Chapter 7: Guidelines for Intercropping…………………………………………………………………...95 Charles L. Mohler and Kimberly A. Stoner Interplanting Crops with Partially Overlapping Growing Seasons……………………………......96 Intercropping Legumes with Nonlegumes……………………………………………………....……..96 Using Tall Crops to Reduce Drought or Heat Stress of Shorter Crops……………………....…….96 Using Intercropping to Disrupt Host Finding by Some Host-Specific Insect Pests…………......98 How Intercrops Affect Populations of Beneficial Parasitoids and Pest Predators………….....99 Using Trap Crops to Reduce Pests………………………………………………………………….....….99 A Glossary of Intercropping Terms………………………………………………………………….......100 Appendix 1: Characteristics of Crops Commonly Grown in the Northeastern United States....101 Charles L. Mohler and Anusuya Rangarajan Appendix 2: Crop Sequence Problems and Opportunities…………………………………….....…104 Charles L. Mohler Appendix 3: Sources of Inoculum for Crop Diseases in the Northeastern United States……....124 Margaret Tuttle McGrath Appendix 4: Characteristics of Common Agricultural Weeds Relevant to Crop Rotation.....…138 Charles L. Mohler Appendix 5: Crop Disease Pathogens Hosted by Common Agricultural Weeds………….…....142 Charles L. Mohler and Margaret Tuttle McGrath Appendix 6: Linking a Field Map and Spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel…………………………....148 Jody Bolluyt, Peter Lowy, and Charles L. Mohler References………………………………………………………..………………………………………………………..150 About SARE……..………………………………………………………………………………………………………155 About PALS .......................................................................................................................................................... 156 iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Production of Crop Rotation on Organic Farms: A Planning Manual was made possible with funding from Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). See page 155 for more information about SARE. This project was a collaboration between researchers, extension educators, and growers. The authors especially thank the twelve farmers who participated in the DACUM process, and whose efforts created the foundation for this project: Polly Amour, Four Winds Farm, Gardiner, NY; Paul Arnold, Pleasant Valley Farm, Argyle, NY; David Blyn, Riverbank Farm, Roxbury, CT; Roy Brubaker, Village Acres Farm, Mifflintown, PA; Jean-Paul Courtens, Roxbury Farm, Kinderhook, NY; Jim Gerritsen, Wood Prairie Farm, Bridgewater, ME; Brett Grohsgal, Even Star Organic Farm, Lexington Park, MD; Jack Gurley, Calvert’s Gift Farm, Sparks, MD; Don Kretschmann, Kretschmann Farm, Rochester, PA; Drew Norman, One Straw Farm, White Hall, MD; Eero Ruuttila, Nesenkeag Farm, Litchfield, NH; and Will Stevens, Golden Russet Farm, Shoreham, VT. Tina Overtoom, The Center on Education and Training for Employment, The Ohio State University, was the DACUM facilitator, and Eric Toensmeier, then with the New England Small Farm Institute, assisted her. Many additional growers reviewed and verified the DACUM chart: Frank Albani, Jay Armour, Mike and Terra Brownback, Judy Dornstreitch, Pam Flory, Darrell Frey, Les and Debbie Guile, Rick Hood, Jason Kafka, Dwain Livengood, Bryan O’Hara, Robin Ostfeld, L. Smith, Ed Stockman, Paul Volcklawen, and several anonymous reviewers. The authors also thank the following reviewers for the many improvements they suggested: Brian Caldwell, farm education coordinator, NOFA-NY; Kathryne L. Everts, associate professor, Plant Pathology, University of Maryland and University of Delaware; Caragh B. Fitzgerald, extension educator, Maryland Cooperative Extension; Eric Gallandt, assistant professor, Weed Ecology and Management, University of Maine; Vern Grubinger, vegetable and berry specialist, University of Vermont Extension and regional coordinator, Northeast SARE; Jerzy Nowak, professor, Horticulture Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Ginny Rozenkranz, extension educator, Maryland Cooperative Extension; Elsa Sanchez, assistant professor, Horticulture Systems Management, The Pennsylvania State University; Abby Seaman, senior extension associate, Cornell Cooperative Extension; Eric Sideman, organic crop specialist, Maine Organic Farmers & Gardeners
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 11 Prospectus.Indd
    2011 SPRING PROSPECTUS Portland State VIKINGS 2011 PORTLAND STATE VIKINGS SCHEDULE Date Opponent Location Kickoff Sept. 3 SOUTHERN OREGON JELD-WEN FIELD TBA Sept. 10 open Sept. 17 NORTHERN ARIZONA* JELD-WEN FIELD TBA Sept. 24 @ TCU Fort Worth, TX TBA Oct. 1 @ Idaho State* Pocatello, ID TBA Oct. 8 MONTANA STATE* JELD-WEN FIELD TBA Oct. 15 @ Montana* Missoula, MT TBA Oct. 22 WILLAMETTE JELD-WEN FIELD TBA Oct. 29 @ Eastern Washington* Cheney, WA TBA Nov. 5 SACRAMENTO STATE* JELD-WEN FIELD TBA Nov. 12 @ Northern Colorado* Greeley, CO TBA Nov. 19 WEBER STATE* JELD-WEN FIELD TBA NCAA Playoffs: First Round, Nov. 20; Second Round, Dec. 3; Quarterfinals, Dec. 10 Semifinals, Dec. 16/17; National Championship, Jan. 6, Frisco, TX * Big Sky Conference game Game times will be released in June Radio: KXFD Freedom 970 AM TV: TBA Live Streaming Video: www.b2tv.com Live Stats: www.GoViks.com SR QB Connor Kavanaugh SR RB Cory McCaffrey Honorable Mention 1st team All-Big Sky All-Big Sky Conference Conference 2011 Spring Practice Portland State will practice every Monday, Wednesday and Friday from April 4 through May 4. Practice takes place at Stott Com- munity Field on the PSU campus from 1:30-4 p.m. 2011 Spring Game SR SS DeShawn Shead Portland State’s Annual Spring Game takes place on Saturday, 2nd team All-Big Sky Conference May 7, at 1 p.m. at Lincoln High School 2011 SPRING PROSPECTUS Portland State VIKINGS Physical Address ____________ 527 SW Hall, Suite 415, Portland, OR 97201 VIKING FOOTBALL COACHING STAFF Mailing Address _______________________
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fishfarming Systems in the Tropics DEC 2 1
    S'H ICLARM STUDIESAND REVIEWS16 I. 207 I SR76 #.16 C.t 1 Research and Education for the Development of , r Integrated Crop-livestock-Fish Farming t \ Systems in the Tropics P. Edwards R.S.V. Pullin J.A. Gartner I If - I:' '!Io, .. .... \D ',- .'. , r . ~ _frl~TERNATIONAL C~NTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAG.EMENT , " i ' :1 i I .I earch and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fish Farming Systems in the Tropics J.A. Gartner INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANILA, PHILIPPINES Research and education for the development of integrated crop-livestock-fishfarming systems in the tropics DEC 2 1 P. EDWARDS R.S.V. hum J. A. GARTNER Published by the International Center for Living Aauatic Reswrces Mana~ement.MC P.O. Box 1501. ~hcati,Metm Manila, Pklippiis with fmancid assistance from the United Nations Development Programme New York. USA Printed in Manila. Philippines Edwards. P.. R.S.V. Pullin and J.A. Gamer. 1988. Research and education for the development of integrated cmp-livestock-fish farming systems in the tropics. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 16.53 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines. ISSN 01 15-4389 ISBN 97 1-1022-46-X Cover: Small-scale integrated crop-livestock-fish farming in a rainfed area of Northeast ?hailand. ?his ria farm has a small fishpond that provides fish. pennits dry season cultivation of vegetables on rhe dikes and suppliis drinking water for livestock. ICLARM Contribution No. 470 Contents Preface ................................................. Introduction .............................................. The Concept of Integrated Farming Systems A Definition of Integrated Farming ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Cropping Systems: Increasing Adaptability Amid an Uncertain Future
    Published online June 5, 2007 Dynamic Cropping Systems: Increasing Adaptability Amid an Uncertain Future J. D. Hanson,* M. A. Liebig, S. D. Merrill, D. L. Tanaka, J. M. Krupinsky, and D. E. Stott ABSTRACT was »6.5 billion in late 2005, and is projected to rise Future trends in population growth, energy use, climate change, to 7.6 billion by 2020 and 9.1 billion by 2050 (United and globalization will challenge agriculturists to develop innovative Nations Population Division, 2006). To meet the demand production systems that are highly productive and environmentally for food, agriculture will need to produce as much food sound. Furthermore, future agricultural production systems must pos- in the next 25 yr as it has produced in the last 10 000 yr sess an inherent capacity to adapt to change to be sustainable. Given (Mountain, 2006). Increasing food production to this this context, adoption of dynamic cropping systems is proposed to extent will have significant ramifications on resource meet multiple agronomic and environmental objectives through the use. From 1961 to 1996, the doubling of agricultural food enhancement of management adaptability to externalities. Dynamic production was associated with a 6.9-fold increase in cropping systems are a form of agricultural production that relies on an annual strategy to optimize the outcome of (i) production, (ii) eco- N fertilization, a 3.5-fold increase in P fertilization, a nomic, and (iii) resource conservation goals using ecologically-based 1.7-fold increase of irrigated cropland, and a 1.1-fold management principles. Dynamic cropping systems are inherently increase of land under cultivation (Tilman, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • HAND-ROLLED Omelets GERMAN PANCAKES TRADITIONAL
    Add “the ADD FRUIT HAND-ROLLED omelets works” to GERMAN PANCAKES Topping! crepes & waffles sandwiches your hash Northwest Triple-Berry, Fluffy three-egg omelets served with choice of Famous Buttermilk browns Almost as big as Crater Lake! A delightful combination of farm-fresh “AA” Strawberry, Freshly-made crepes and waffles accompanied by two farm-fresh “AA” eggs*, and your choice of Served with your choice of Northwest Fries, cottage cheese or creamy coleslaw. Substitute sweet Pancakes, Northwest Hash Browns or fresh seasonal fruit. Hash brown Daily’s® smokehouse bacon, eggs, milk and flour is blended and baked to golden brown. Cinnamon Apple breakfast meat. onion rings, a cup of soup or a Yellow Bowl Dinner Salad for an additional charge. Tillamook® Cheddar cheese, or Lingonberry Butter and seasonal fruit choice also accompanied by a freshly-baked buttermilk green onions and a dollop biscuit. Omelets may be prepared with egg whites upon request. of sour cream for an CLASSIC GERMAN PANCAKE BELGIAN WAFFLE FRUIT FESTIVAL CREPES CASCADE CLUB GARDEN FRESH additional charge. Lemon wedges, whipped butter and powdered sugar. Thick and crispy Belgian waffle served with whipped Two freshly-made crepes with your choice of Daily’s® smokehouse bacon, honey-cured ham, Fresh avocado, baby spinach, sweet onion, DENVER & TILLAMOOK® FARMER’s Add fruit topping for an additional charge. butter and your choice of warm Elmer’s pancake Northwest triple-berry, strawberry, or cinnamon roasted turkey breast, Tillamook® Cheddar cheese provolone cheese, sliced hard-boiled egg, tomato CHEDDAR Hickory smoked ham, Daily’s® smokehouse syrup or Oregon Marionberry syrup. apple drizzled with cream cheese icing.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversifying Cropping Systems PROFILE: THEY DIVERSIFIED to SURVIVE 3
    Opportunities in Agriculture CONTENTS WHY DIVERSIFY? 2 Diversifying Cropping Systems PROFILE: THEY DIVERSIFIED TO SURVIVE 3 ALTERNATIVE CROPS 4 PROFILE: DIVERSIFIED NORTH DAKOTAN WORKS WITH MOTHER NATURE 9 PROTECT NATURAL RESOURCES, RENEW PROFITS 10 AGROFORESTRY 13 PROFILE: PROFITABLE PECANS WORTH THE WAIT 15 STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY, SHARE LABOR 15 PROFILE: STRENGTHENING TIES AMONG MAINE FARMERS 16 RESOURCES 18 Alternative grains and oilseeds – like, from left, buckwheat, amaranth and flax – add diversity to cropping systems and open profitable niche markets while contributing to environmentally sound operations. – Photos by Rob Myers Published by the Sustainable KARL KUPERS, AN EASTERN WASHINGTON GRAIN GROWER, Although growing alternative crops to diversify a Agriculture Network (SAN), was a typical dryland wheat farmer who idled his traditional farm rotation increase profits while lessen- the national outreach arm land in fallow to conserve moisture. After years of ing adverse environmental impacts, the majority of of the Sustainable Agriculture watching his soil blow away and his market price slip, U.S. cropland is still planted in just three crops: soy- Research and Education he made drastic changes to his 5,600-acre operation. beans, corn and wheat. That lack of crop diversity (SARE) program, with funding In place of fallow, he planted more profitable hard can cause problems for farmers, from low profits by USDA's Cooperative State red and hard white wheats along with seed crops like to soil erosion. Adding new crops that fit climate, Research, Education and condiment mustard, sunflower, grass and safflower. geography and management preferences can Extension Service. All of those were drilled using a no-till system Kupers improve not only your bottom line, but also your calls direct-seeding.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Effect of New Crops in the Agricultural Revolution? Evidence from an Arbitrage Model of Crop Rotation
    What was the Effect of New Crops in the Agricultural Revolution? Evidence from an Arbitrage Model of Crop Rotation Liam Brunt1 Abstract In this paper we develop an arbitrage model of crop rotation that enables us to estimate the impact of crop rotation on wheat yields, using only the yields and prices of each crop employed in the rotation. We apply this technique to eighteenth century England to assess the importance of two new crops – turnips and clover – in raising wheat yields. Contrary to the received wisdom, we show that turnips substantially pushed up wheat yields but clover pushed down wheat yields. We confirm this result by comparing our estimates to both experimental data and production function estimates. Further detailed analysis facilitated by the new model enables us to explain this surprising result in terms of the management practices pursued by farmers. Keywords: agriculture, crop rotation, technological change. JEL Classification: N01, N53, O13, Q12. 1 I would like to thank James Foreman-Peck and Lucy White for helpful comments. Any remaining errors are my own responsibility. An arbitrage model of crop rotation 2 I. Introduction. The defining feature of the Industrial Revolution in England was the transfer of labour resources from agriculture to industry, which occurred exceptionally early by international standards.2 But England had to remain virtually self-sufficient in food production during the eighteenth century because very few exportable surpluses were being generated by other European countries.3 The adoption of new technology was a crucial factor that permitted England to attain a high level of agricultural labour productivity – which in turn facilitated labour release.4 The number and range of innovations coming into general use in the eighteenth century has prompted commentators to dub it the period of the ‘Agricultural Revolution’.5 There were new animal breeds (the Shire horse and the dairy short horn cow); new crops (turnips and clover); new machines (seed drills and threshers); and new hand tools (the cradle scythe).
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture – Food Garden to Maximize Research Multiple Vegetable Yield – a Farmer Success Story
    Success Story Journal Home: www.bioticainternational.com Article: RT0402 Biotica How to cite this article? Bharathi, Permaculture – Food Garden to Maximize Research Multiple Vegetable Yield – A Farmer Success Story. Today [Biotica Research Today 2(11): 1137-1139. [ 1137 Abstract Vol 2:11 egetable cultivation is considered to be a high returned 1139 agri-business. The present case was documented for a 2020 VPermaculture technique adopted by a farmer under the technical guidance of KVK, Namakkal at Palapatti village of Namakkal Permaculture – Food District, Tamil Nadu, India. The observations revealed that sale of multi vegetables at a time and get a gross income of Rs. 1,500.00 Garden to Maximize per day than sole vegetable (Rs. 300.00 – 500.00). The permaculture farmer considers that there is a need to diversify the mono cropping Multiple Vegetable Yield – to multiple cropping in a piece of land for secure and sustainable A Farmer Success Story future. Background Information Sharmila Bharathi C. hri K. K. Velusamy is doing agriculture since 2007 and ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Veterinary College and practiced vegetable cultivation in conventional pattern. Research Institute Campus, TANUVAS, Namakkal, Tamil He cultivated each type of vegetable in a single field as Nadu (637 002), India S a monoculture in an area of 50 cent to 1 acre. He observed that the plants of the similar species compete for the same nutrients and become an attractive habitat for pests of that plant and in turn poor yield and return. He also noticed soil Open Access nutrient depletion in that cultivation system. Apart from these, he faced poor returns due to market fluctuation and huge Corresponding Author arrival of the same type of vegetable at that time (Rs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pork Production System and Its Development in Mainland China
    International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture Vol. 3(5), pp. 166-174, May 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/IJFA ISSN 2006-9839 ©2011 Academic Journals Review Pork production system and its development in mainland China Heng-wei Cheng 1*, You-ming Wang 2, Qing-ping Meng 2, Jia Guo 2 and Yi-zheng Wang 2 1Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, West Lafayette, IN 47906, USA. 2Institute of Feed Science, Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, P. R. China. Accepted 11 April, 2011 Livestock production and marketing have been driven by the growing consumer demand for high quality and low cost animal protein. As a result, intensive livestock industries have been rapidly developing globally. International trade, especially with China, creates new opportunities and challenges for the emerging international agriculture market. China provides an enormous market for international trade by stimulating its import and export activities. Pigs are the primary farm animals raised for human consumption in China, and the development of pork production systems in China will affect its trade globally. To meet the need for developing international animal agriculture and trade, this article describes the current status of the swine industry, its production in China and the factors that may affect its development. Urbanization, available farmland, grain production, water resources and management practices encompass some of these factors. In addition, the effects of the culture, religion and education of the populations on the development of swine sector in China are also discussed. Understanding the development of the swine production system and its associated factors is critical to assessing China’s impact and implication in the emerging international agricultural market.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    (This is a sample cover image for this issue. The actual cover is not yet available at this time.) This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Aeolian Research 8 (2013) 29–38 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Aeolian Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aeolia Review Article Summary of the Third International Planetary Dunes Workshop: Remote Sensing and Image Analysis of Planetary Dunes, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA, June 12–15, 2012 ⇑ Lori K. Fenton a, , Rosalyn K. Hayward b, Briony H.N. Horgan c, David M. Rubin d, Timothy N. Titus b, Mark A. Bishop e,f, Devon M. Burr g, Matthew Chojnacki g, Cynthia L. Dinwiddie h, Laura Kerber i, Alice Le Gall j, Timothy I. Michaels a, Lynn D.V. Neakrase k, Claire E. Newman l, Daniela Tirsch m, Hezi Yizhaq n, James R. Zimbelman o a Carl Sagan Center at the SETI Institute, 189 Bernardo Ave., Suite 100, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA b United States Geological Survey, Astrogeology Science Center, 2255 N.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Dunes on Mars
    CHAPTER II: PLANET MARS – THE BACKGROUND Like Earth, its neighbour planet, Mars, is a terrestrial planet with a solid surface, an atmosphere, two ice-covered pole caps, and not one but two moons (Phobos and Deimos). Some differences, such as a greater distance to the sun, a smaller diameter, a thinner atmosphere, and the longer duration of a year distinguish Mars from the Earth, not to forget the absence of life…so far. Nevertheless, there are many correlations between terrestrial and Martian geological and geomorphological processes, permitting researchers to apply knowledge from terrestrial studies more or less directly to Mars. However, a closer look reveals that the dissimilarities, though few, can make fundamental differences in process background and development. The following chapter provides a brief but necessary insight into the geological and physical background of this planet, imparting to the reader some fundamental knowledge about Mars, which is useful for understanding this work. Fig. 1 presents an impression of Mars viewed from space. Figure 1: The planet Mars: a global view (Viking 1 Orbiter mosaic [NASA]). Chapter II Planet Mars – The Background 5 Table 1 provides a summary of some major astronomical and physical parameters of Mars, giving the reader an impression of the extent to which they differ from terrestrial values. Table 1: Parameters of Mars [Kieffer et al., 1992a]. Property Dimension Orbit 227 940 000 km (1.52 AU) mean distance to the Sun Diameter 6794 km Mass 6.4185 * 1023 kg 3 Mean density ~3.933 g/cm Obliquity
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Designing a Compliant Crop Rotation
    Guidance for Designing a Compliant Crop Rotation Crop rotation is an important cultural method for managing nutrients, combating pests, and protecting vital natural resources. Rotations designed using knowledge of plant biology, weed cycles, and nutrient cycling can boost yields and provide investments in soil fertility. It is important to consider, however, that while crop rotation has formal and informal meanings, NOP defines crop rotation as “the practice of certified organic operators are required to alternating the annual crops grown on a specific field in a planned pattern or sequence in create a crop rotation as defined through the successive crop years so that crops of the same National Organic Program (NOP). Certifiers, species or family are not grown repeatedly such as PCO, evaluate whether a crop rotation without interruption on the same field. Perennial is compliant with organic regulations based on cropping systems employ means such as alley the regulatory definition and several standards cropping, intercropping, and hedgerows to that refer to crop rotation (7 CFR 205.203, introduce biological diversity in lieu of crop 205.205 and 205.206). rotation.” (7 CFR 205.2) Crop rotation: a functional standard Crop rotation is a required practice in the NOP organic regulations. Generally, crop rotations are planned to take advantage of inherent crop characteristics that will benefit the land, the farmer, and subsequent crops. While there are multiple strategies and possibilities for rotating crops in a given field over time, there are specific functions that must be considered during its design and implementation. PCO will look at your rotation to determine whether it fulfills the following criteria: (1) Maintains or improves soil organic matter; (2) Assists with the management of pests in annual and perennial crops; (3) Manages deficient or excess plant nutrients; and (4) Provides erosion control.
    [Show full text]