Monthly Forecast
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Why Peace Fails in Guinea Bissau? a Political Economy Analysis of the ECOWAS-Brokered Conakry Accord
d Secur n ity a e S c e a r i e e s P FES SENEGAL GUINEA-BISSAU NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN GUINEA Habibu Yaya Bappah Why Peace Fails in Guinea Bissau? A Political Economy Analysis of the ECOWAS-brokered Conakry Accord SENEGAL GUINEA-BISSAU NORTH ATLANTIC OCEAN GUINEA Habibu Yaya Bappah Why Peace Fails in Guinea Bissau? A Political Economy Analysis of the ECOWAS-brokered Conakry Accord About the author Dr Habibu Yaya Bappah is a full time Lecturer in the Department of Political Science/International Studies at Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria. His teaching and research interests are in regional integration, regional security and governance, human rights, democracy and development with a particular focus on the African Union and ECOWAS. He has had stints and research fellowships in the Department of Political Affairs, Peace and Security at the ECOWAS Commission and in the African Union Peace & Security Programme at the Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. He is an alumnus of the African Leadership Centre (ALC) at King’s College London. Imprint Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Peace and Security Centre of Competence Sub-Saharan Africa Point E, boulevard de l’Est, Villa n°30 P.O. Box 15416 Dakar-Fann, Senegal Tel.: +221 33 859 20 02 Fax: +221 33 864 49 31 Email: [email protected] www.fes-pscc.org ©Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung 2017 Layout : Green Eyez Design SARL, www.greeneyezdesign.com ISBN : 978-2-490093-01-4 “Commercial use of all media published by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is not permitted without the written consent of the FES. -
Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform
\\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\53-2\HLI202.txt unknown Seq: 1 22-MAY-12 12:26 Volume 53, Number 2, Summer 2012 Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform Bart M.J. Szewczyk Table of Contents Introduction .............................................. 451 R I. Identifying the Security Council’s Problem ....... 452 R A. Conventional Critiques and Reforms ................... 455 R B. Misdiagnoses of the Council’s Power ................... 458 R C. Misdiagnoses of the Council’s Legitimacy................ 462 R D. Theoretical Limitations of Existing Reforms ............. 466 R II. Interpreting the Security Council’s Purpose ...... 471 R A. Text, Context, and Practice of Article 24 ............... 472 R B. Uncertainty of Law and Power in Complex Orders ....... 475 R C. Empirical Analysis of Legitimacy ..................... 480 R D. Norms of Legitimacy ................................ 483 R III. Inclusive Contextual Cooperation in the United Nations ............................................. 488 R A. Development of Shared Understandings ................. 488 R B. Expected Future Scenarios of the World ................. 495 R C. Reforms for the Security Council....................... 497 R D. Reforms for the General Assembly ..................... 499 R IV. Conclusion ......................................... 500 R \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLI\53-2\HLI202.txt unknown Seq: 2 22-MAY-12 12:26 450 Harvard International Law Journal / Vol. 53 Variable Multipolarity and U.N. Security Council Reform Bart M.J. Szewczyk* One of the fundamental international law questions over the past two decades has been the structure of the United Nations Security Council. In a world of variable multipolarity, whereby changing crises demand different combinations of actors with relevant resources and shared interests, the Council’s reform should be based not on expanded permanent membership—as mistakenly held by conventional wisdom—but on inclusive contextual participation in decisionmaking. -
Security Council Reform STUDENT OFFICER: Cate Goldwater-Breheney POSITION: Assistant Chair
FORUM: Security Council ISSUE: Security Council Reform STUDENT OFFICER: Cate Goldwater-Breheney POSITION: Assistant Chair Introduction What is the UNSC and how does it work? The United Nations Security Council is an organ of the United Nations with “primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security”. Its powers include the establishment of international sanctions and peacekeeping operations, as well as the authorization of military action and investigation of conflicts. It is the only UN body that can issue binding resolutions to other member states – in other words, you have to do what it says. Furthermore, it deals with the admittance of new UN member states and Secretary-General (UN “leader”) candidacies. It is thus a very powerful body within the UN, and has been involved in serious international issues, including the Korean War, the Suez Canal Crisis and more recently the Rwandan Genocide. The UNSC has a complicated set-up. It has 15 members, five of whom are permanent members: France, the UK, the USA, China and Russia (essentially the victors from WW2). These permanent members have veto powers; should they vote against a resolution, it automatically does not pass. Resolutions otherwise require a 2/3 majority to pass, or 10 votes in favour. The 10 non-permanent members are elected for two year terms on a regional basis; the African Group holds 3 seats, the Latin America and the Caribbean, Asia-Pacific, and Western European and Others groups, 2 seats, and the Eastern European group, 1 seat. The presidency of the UNSC rotates monthly. UNSC non-permanent members in 2019 are: Germany, Belgium, South Africa, the Dominican Republic, Indonesia, the Ivory Coast, Equatorial Guinea, Kuwait, Peru, and Poland. -
Responsibility to Protect Or Reform?
12 April 2012 Responsibility to Protect or Reform? The doctrine of Responsibility to Protect is not going to disappear soon — and neither is the question of UN Security Council Reform. As time passes, they are becoming more and more intertwined. But which should take precedent? By Casey L. Coombs for ISN UN Security Council (UNSC) resolution 1973 -- the legal basis for NATO’s six month bombing campaign to enforce a no-fly zone in Libya -- was the first unambiguous use of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine. R2P is an emerging international humanitarian and security norm which grants the Council power to intervene if a sovereign state is unable, or unwilling, to protect its population from war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing or other crimes against humanity. In 2005, all 191 member states in the UN General Assembly (GA) endorsed the doctrine in principle. After the experiences of the Libyan intervention however, UN members are now torn over how or even if R2P can be fairly implemented in practice. The debate has crippled the UNSC on Syria and according to former UN Assistant Secretary-General Ramesh Thakur, rekindled serious concerns about the need to reform the 15-nation body to bring it into the twenty-first century. The Controversy The NATO air campaign over Libya was a qualified success. Successful in that it fulfilled its R2P obligations of averting what appeared at the time to be the almost certain slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Benghazians at the hand of Colonel Muammar Qaddafi’s army; qualified, however, because NATO went beyond just protecting anti-Qaddafi rebels by supplying them with arms (in contravention of the arms embargo imposed on Libya in resolution 1973) and then actively facilitating the rebels’ eventual takeover of Tripoli. -
Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World
Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Raymond, C. (2018). Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World. Paper presented at European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, Hamburg, Germany. Document Version: Other version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2018 The Author. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:26. Sep. 2021 Religious Diversity and the Number of Religious Parties Around the World Christopher D. Raymond Lecturer in Politics Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] Key Words Religious parties; religious diversity; religious markets; party system fragmentation; social cleavages Abstract Arguing that religious diversity creates incentives for political cooperation, recent research questions the assumption that religious diversity leads to more fragmented party systems and finds a negative association between religious diversity and the fragmentation of vote shares. -
Critical Currents No.4 May 2008
critical currents Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation Occasional Paper Series The Quest for Regional Representation Reforming the United Nations Security Council no.4 May 2008 Beyond Diplomacy – Perspectives on Dag Hammarskjöld 1 critical currents no.4 May 2008 The Quest for Regional Representation Reforming the United Nations Security Council Edited by Volker Weyel With contributions by Richard Hartwig Kaire M. Mbuende Céline Nahory James Paul Volker Weyel Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation Uppsala 2008 The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation pays tribute to the memory of the second Secretary-General of the UN by searching for and examining workable alternatives for a socially and economically just, ecologically sustainable, peaceful and secure world. In the spirit of Dag Hammarskjöld's integrity, his readiness to challenge the Critical Currents is an dominant powers and his passionate plea Occasional Paper Series for the sovereignty of small nations and published by the their right to shape their own destiny, the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation. Foundation seeks to examine mainstream It is also available online at understanding of development and bring to www.dhf.uu.se. the debate alternative perspectives of often unheard voices. Statements of fact or opinion are those of the authors and By making possible the meeting of minds, do not imply endorsement experiences and perspectives through the by the Foundation. organising of seminars and dialogues, Manuscripts for review the Foundation plays a catalysing role should be sent to in the identifi cation of new issues and [email protected]. the formulation of new concepts, policy proposals, strategies and work plans towards Series editor: Henning Melber solutions. The Foundation seeks to be at the Language editor: Wendy Davies cutting edge of the debates on development, Design & Production: Mattias Lasson security and environment, thereby Printed by X-O Graf Tryckeri AB continuously embarking on new themes ISSN 1654-4250 in close collaboration with a wide and Copyright on the text is with the constantly expanding international network. -
Elect the Council Concept Note
Elect the Council Motivation and Proposals Version 4 Towards a legitimate and effective UN Security Council At a time of unprecedented global insecurity and turmoil the world needs a legitimate and effective United Nations Security Council (UNSC). There is little prospect of progress towards this goal in the intergovernmental negotiations in New York that is charged with this process. Elect the Council invites comments on this fourth revised version of its proposals for reform of the UNSC. A final document will be the basis for a global mobilization and advocacy campaign. That campaign will work with civil society partners and academics to advocate for an enabling resolution by two thirds of the member states of the UN General Assembly (UNGA). Elect the Council proposes to do away with permanent seats on the UNSC and the veto and to move towards a system where countries are elected to the Council bound to four technical requirements for candidacy. In addition, global powers that exceed a set proportion of the world’s population, economy and defence expenditure will automatically qualify for seats. As a result, after a 15-year transition the UNSC will consist of 24 elected countries plus the two or three countries that will expectedly automatically qualify due to their size and influence. Eight of the 24 elected countries will be elected for five-year terms and will be immediately re-electable. The remaining 16 countries will be elected for three years but not be re- electable. The current five electoral regions that elect the ten non-permanent members of the UNSC will nominate candidates for election by simple majority in the UNGA in line with current practice although changes to the composition of the regions should be pursued. -
Amerimuncvi BG UNSC.Pdf
© 2018 American University Model United Nations Conference All rights reserved. No part of this background guide may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever without express written permission from the American University Model United Nations Conference Secretariat. Please direct all questions to [email protected] Emily Michels & Sophia Casabonne Chairs Dear Delegates, Welcome to AmeriMUNC VI at American University! Our names are Sophia and Emily, and we’ll be your committee chairs for this year’s conference. We very excited to meet each and every one of you when the day comes, but in the meantime please make the most of your pre-conference research. Sophia is a junior at American University in the School of International Service, with a minor in Russian Studies. She is also a member of the AU Honors Program. Sophia is currently studying abroad in St. Petersburg, Russia. Originally from Albany, New York, Sophia joined the AU Model United Nations Team her freshman year, and also served on the AmeriMUNC V Secretariat as the Director of Communications. In her free time, Sophia loves talking about Russia, spending time with her Phi Mu sisters, and watching Law and Order. She can't wait to be back on campus for AmeriMUNC VI! Emily is a junior at American University majoring in International Studies. She grew up in Huntington Beach, California and was very involved in her high school's Model UN team, participating in around 18 conferences before she graduated. Upon coming to American, she has remained involved in Model UN by staffing Amerimunc and was a Vice Chair for the Russian Cabinet last year. -
General Assembly Distr.: General 30 April 2020
United Nations A/AC.121/2020/INF/4 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 April 2020 English only Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations New York, 17 February–13 March 2020 List of participants Chair Mr. Samson Sunday Itegboje (Nigeria) Vice-Chairs Mr. Alejandro Guillermo Verdier (Argentina) Mr. Richard Arbeiter (Canada) Mr. Hiroyuki Namazu (Japan) Mr. Mariusz Lewicki (Poland) Rapporteur Mr. Abdullah Ibrahim Abdelhamid Alsayed Attelb (Egypt) 21-01243 (E) 030221 *2101243* A/AC.121/2020/INF/4 Members Afghanistan Albania Algeria Angola H.E. Ms. Maria de Jesus dos Reis Ferreira Mrs. Cesaltina De Almeida Da Silva Dias Ferreira Mr. Manuel Alberto Mr. Tomas Ferreira Marcos Mr. Jose Manuel Da Rocha Cristovao Argentina H.E. Mr. Martín García Moritán Mr. Alejandro Guillermo Verdier Mr. Fernando Andrés Marani Ms. Natalia Virginia Babio Mr. Gonzalo Sebastián Mazzeo Mr. Alejandro Norberto Leonardi Armenia Australia Austria Mr. Jochen Hans-Joachim Almoslechner Ms. Andrea Bacher Mr. Manfred Hanzl Mr. Gernot-Siegfried Schröttner Mr. Hans Horst Ehling Azerbaijan Bangladesh H.E. Ms. Rabab Fatima Mr. Tareq Md Ariful Islam Mr. Nirupam Dev Nath Belarus Belgium Mrs. Delphine Delieux Mr. Ruben Ballegeer Mr. Danny Geerinck Benin Bhutan H.E. Ms. Doma Tshering Mr. Karma Sonam Tshosar Colonel Kinley Dhondup Namda Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Bosnia and Herzegovina H.E. Mr. Sven Alkalaj Mr. Jasmin Katica Mr. Saša Milanović Brazil Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria H.E. Mr. Georgi Velikov Panayotov Mr. Svetoslav Stankov Stankov 2/11 21-01243 A/AC.121/2020/INF/4 Burkina Faso H.E. Mr. Yemdaogo Eric Tiare Mr. Gervais Remen Mrs. Hama Mariam Natama Mr. -
H.E. Mr. Ghulam Mohammad Isaczai Permanent Representative of Afghanistan to the United Nations 633 Third Avenue, 27Th Floor
H.E. Mr. Ghulam Mohammad Isaczai H.E. Ms. Besiana Kadare Permanent Representative of Afghanistan Permanent Representative of the Republic to the United Nations of Albania to the United Nations 633 Third Avenue, 27 th Floor 320 East 79 th Street New York, N.Y. 10017 New York, N.Y. 10075 H.E. Mr. Sofiane Mimouni H.E. Mrs. Elisenda Vives Balmaña Permanent Representative of Algeria Permanent Representative of the Principality to the United Nations of Andorra to the United Nations 326 East 48 th Street Two United Nations Plaza, 27th Floor New York, N.Y. 10017 New York, N.Y. 10017 H.E. Mr. Walton Alfonso Webson H.E. Ms. Maria de Jesus dos Reis Ferreira Permanent Representative of Permanent Representative of the Republic Antigua and Barbuda to the United Nations of Angola to the United Nations 3 Dag Condominiums 820 Second Avenue, 12 th Floor 305 East 47th Street, 6th Floor New York, N.Y. 10017 New York, N.Y. 10017 H.E. Mr. María del Carmen Squeff H.E. Mr. Mher Margaryan Permanent Representative of Argentina Permanent Representative of the Republic to the United Nations of Armenia to the United Nations One United Nations Plaza, 25 th Floor 119 East 36 th Street New York, N.Y. 10017 New York, N.Y. 10016 H.E. Mr. Mitchell Peter Fifield H.E. Mr. Alexander Marschik Permanent Representative of Australia Permanent Representative of Austria to the United Nations to the United Nations 150 East 42 nd Street, 33 rd Floor 600 Third Avenue, 31 st Floor New York, N.Y. -
Reforming Multilateralism in Post-Covid Times
ited for A NEW MULTILATERALISM EDITED BY MARIO TELÒ REFORMING MULTILATERALISM IN POST-COVID TIMES FOR A MORE REGIONALISED, BINDING AND LEGITIMATE UNITED NATIONS EDITED BY Mario Telò REFORMING MULTILATERALISM IN POST-COVID TIMES IN POST-COVID REFORMING MULTILATERALISM PUBLISHED IN DECEMBER 2020 BY Foundation for European Progressive Studies Avenue des Arts 46 B-1000 Brussels, Belgium +32 2 234 69 00 [email protected] www.feps-europe.eu @FEPS_Europe EDITOR AND PROJECT SCIENTIFIC DIRECTOR Mario Telò LEADER OF THE PROJECT Maria João Rodrigues, President, Foundation for European Progressive Studies FEPS COORDINATORS OF THE PROJECT Hedwig Giusto, Susanne Pfeil IAI COORDINATOR OF THE PROJECT Ettore Greco COPYRIGHT © 2020 Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS) PROOFREADING AND COPY EDITING Nicky Robinson GRAPHIC DESIGN Triptyque.be COVER PHOTO Shutterstock PRINTED BY Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR Published with the financial support of the European Parliament. The views expressed in this report are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Parliament. ISBN 978-2-930769-46-2 PROJECT PARTNERS FRIEDRICH-EBERT-STIFTUNG NEW YORK OFFICE 747 Third Avenue, Suite 34D, New York, NY 10017, United States +1 (212) 687-0208 [email protected] https://www.feps-europe.eu @fesnewyork FONDATION JEAN-JAURÈS 12 Cité Malesherbes, 75009 Paris, France +33 (0)1 40 23 24 00 https://jean-jaures.org [email protected] @j_jaures CENTRO STUDI DI POLITICA INTERNAZIONALE (CeSPI) Piazza Venezia 11, 00187 Roma, Italy +39 -
September 2018 Forecast.Indd
September 2018 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 1 In Hindsight: South Sudan Arms Embargo 3 Status Update since our The US has the presidency in September. At press a meeting on the current unrest in Nicaragua, but August Forecast time, the intention appears to be to hold all Coun- some members may oppose having this issue dis- cil meetings in public, with consultations only cussed by the Council. 5 Peacekeeping Operations scheduled for the adoption of the programme of Early in the month Council members expect work for the month. Although no meetings are to receive briefings on Libya by Special Repre- 7 Libya currently foreseen for the last week of Septem- sentative and head of UNSMIL Ghassan Sala- 8 Haiti ber, the US could still choose the presence of the mé and the chair of the 1970 Libya Sanctions 10 Colombia world’s top officials in New York to schedule a Committee, Ambassador Olof Skoog (Sweden). 11 Somalia high-level meeting in the Council. An adoption to renew UNSMIL is scheduled for 13 Syria The US has two signature events: on peace- mid-September. keeping, and on corruption and conflict. The Other African issues this month include: 15 Afghanistan meeting on corruption will include a briefing by • Somalia, on the activities of UNSOM; 16 South Sudan Secretary-General António Guterres and a repre- • Sudan, on the activities of UNISFA in Abyei; 18 Sudan/South Sudan sentative from civil society. The Council will also and 19 Corruption and Conflict receive the first comprehensive annual briefing • South Sudan, on the activities of UNMISS.