The Cryosphere, 9, 465–478, 2015 www.the-cryosphere.net/9/465/2015/ doi:10.5194/tc-9-465-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Geophysical mapping of palsa peatland permafrost Y. Sjöberg1, P. Marklund2, R. Pettersson2, and S. W. Lyon1 1Department of Physical Geography and the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden 2Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden Correspondence to: Y. Sjöberg (
[email protected]) Received: 15 August 2014 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 13 October 2014 Revised: 3 February 2015 – Accepted: 10 February 2015 – Published: 4 March 2015 Abstract. Permafrost peatlands are hydrological and bio- ing in these landscapes are influenced by several factors other geochemical hotspots in the discontinuous permafrost zone. than climate, including hydrological, geological, morpholog- Non-intrusive geophysical methods offer a possibility to ical, and erosional processes that often combine in complex map current permafrost spatial distributions in these envi- interactions (e.g., McKenzie and Voss, 2013; Painter et al., ronments. In this study, we estimate the depths to the per- 2013; Zuidhoff, 2002). Due to these interactions, peatlands mafrost table and base across a peatland in northern Swe- are often dynamic with regards to their thermal structures and den, using ground penetrating radar and electrical resistivity extent, as the distribution of permafrost landforms (such as tomography. Seasonal thaw frost tables (at ∼ 0.5 m depth), dome-shaped palsas and flat-topped peat plateaus) and talik taliks (2.1–6.7 m deep), and the permafrost base (at ∼ 16 m landforms (such as hollows, fens, and lakes) vary with cli- depth) could be detected.