3 April 1996 I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
VOTES and PROCEEDINGS No
1993 THE PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS No. 1 FIRST SESSION OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTH PARLIAMENT TUESDAY, 4 MAY 1993 The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia begun and held in Parliament House, Canberra, on Tuesday, the fourth day of May, in the forty-second year of the Reign of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, and in the year of our Lord One thousand nine hundred and ninety-three. 1 On which day, being the first day of the meeting of the Parliament for the despatch of business pursuant to a Proclamation (which follows), Lyndal McAlpin Barlin, Clerk of the House of Representatives, Ian Charles Harris, Acting Deputy Clerk, Bernard Clive Wright, Acting First Clerk Assistant and Philip Francis Bergin, Serjeant-at-Arms, attending in the House according to their duty, the said Proclamation was read at the Table by the Clerk: PROCLAMATION I, WILLIAM GEORGE HAYDEN, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting in accordance with section 5 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia which provides, among other things, that the Governor-General may appoint such times for holding the sessions of the Parliament as he thinks fit, by this Proclamation: " appoint Tuesday, 4 May 1993 at 10.30 a.m. as the day and time for all Senators and Members of the House of Representatives to assemble at Parliament House; and * summon all Senators and Members of the House of Representatives to attend accordingly. Signed and sealed with the Great Seal of Australia on 21 April 1993 BILL HAYDEN Governor-General By His Excellency's Command PAUL KEATING Prime Minister No. -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1902-2002
INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2002–03 House of Representatives By-elections 1901–2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1440-2009 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2002–03 House of Representatives By-elections 1901–2002 Gerard Newman, Statistics Group Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group 3 March 2003 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Murray Goot, Martin Lumb, Geoff Winter, Jan Pearson, Janet Wilson and Diane Hynes in producing this paper. -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1901-2005
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 16 August 2005, no. 1, 2005–06, ISSN 1832-2883 House of Representatives by-elections 1901–2005 The first part of this revised brief discusses the 141 by-elections for the House of Representatives since Federation, including the most recent for the New South Wales division of Werriwa. The brief’s appendices give a full set of by-election figures. Gerard Newman, Statistics Section Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Section Contents Party abbreviations ................................................... 1 Executive summary ................................................... 2 Contests ......................................................... 2 Causes .......................................................... 2 Outcomes ........................................................ 2 The organisation of Commonwealth by-elections.............................. 3 The reasons why by-elections have been held .............................. 3 The timing of by-elections ............................................ 4 By-elections 1994–05 ............................................. 5 Vacancies for which no by-election was held 1901–2005 ................... 6 Number of nominations .............................................. 6 Candidates per by-election ......................................... 7 Voter turnout ..................................................... 7 Party performance ................................................... -
House of Representatives By-Elections: 1901–2018
RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2018–19 8 MAY 2019 House of Representatives by-elections: 1901–2018 Stephen Barber Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper provides details of House of Representatives by-elections, from that held for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 20 October 2018 for Wentworth. The following observations can be made about those by-elections: • there have been 158 by-elections, an average of 3.5 per parliament. • the nine by-elections held during the current, 45th, Parliament is the second highest number in an individual parliament—seven of these related to dual citizenship; 10 by-elections—nine caused by the deaths of members—were held during the 20th Parliament (1951–1954) • the average number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 11.5 per by-election • in only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate • an increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats • in only ten cases have the opposition party failed to contest a by-election • eighty-three of the by-elections followed the resignation of the member, 68 members died in office, there have been six voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House • since 1949 resignations account for over two-thirds of by-elections and over half the resignations have occurred in safe seats • on 36 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election; five of the losses have been by the opposition of the day • the average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 3.8 per cent and • since 1949 the largest two-party swing against a government (16.1 per cent) occurred against Labor in Canberra in 1995. -
Seminar on the Twentieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the House of Representatives Committee System
Seminar on the Twentieth Anniversary of the Establishment of the House of Representatives Committee System Main Committee Room Parliament House Canberra Friday 15 February 2008 2 Table of Contents Program 5 Notes on participants 7 Presenter papers 17 Professor John Langmore Introduction to session one: overview 19 Mr Rod Sawford Introduction to session two: community participation and member education 25 Professor Ian Marsh Can parliamentary committees contribute to ‘social learning? 29 Ms Siobhan Leyne The changing role of parliamentary committees and the place of the community 63 Hon. Kevin Rozzoli Evolution of the committee system in the House of Representatives 85 Dr Phil Larkin The changing committee system of the British Parliament 95 Background discussion papers 109 Dr Phil Larkin The committees of the House of Representatives in comparative perspective 111 Mr John Baczynski House committee use of information communication technology 129 3 Ms Catherine Cornish Parliament to the people and back again: a discussion of the House Legal Committee’s inquiry into human cloning and stem cell research 149 Ms Clare James Government responses to parliamentary inquiries 159 Mr David Monk Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: A framework for testing the effectiveness of parliamentary committees 179 Mr David Monk A statistical analysis of government responses to committee reports: Reports tabled between the 2001 and 2004 elections 205 Mr Mark Rodrigues Parliamentary inquiries as a form of policy evaluation 249 4 20th Anniversary of the Establishment of the House of Representatives Committee System Friday 15 February 2008 Main Committee Room Parliament House Canberra 8.45 am Registration and light refreshments 9.00 am Welcome & Introduction Mr Harry Jenkins MP 9.10 am Session One: Overview: significant achievements and challenges Chair: Professor John Langmore Panel: Professor John Halligan Professor the Hon. -
SENATE Official Hansard
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES SENATE Official Hansard TUESDAY, 30 APRIL 1996 THIRTY-EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION—FIRST PERIOD BY AUTHORITY OF THE SENATE CANBERRA CONTENTS TUESDAY, 30 APRIL Opening of The Parliament ................................ 1 Commission to Administer The Oath Or Affirmation of Allegiance .... 2 Representation of Victoria ................................ 2 Representation of Australian Capital Territory ................... 2 Representation of Tasmania ............................... 2 Senators: Swearing In .................................... 2 Representation of Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory . 2 Senators: Swearing-in .................................... 2 Governor-General’s Speech ................................ 2 Representation of Victoria ................................ 6 Senators: Swearing In .................................... 7 Representation of South Australia ........................... 7 Governor-General’s Speech ................................ 7 Ministerial Arrangements ................................. 7 Government: Leadership .................................. 9 Australian Labor Party: Leadership .......................... 9 Australian Democrats: Leadership ........................... 11 National Party of Australia: Leadership ....................... 11 Notices of Motion— Contingent Notices of Motion ............................ 11 Procedural Motions .................................... 11 Introduction of Legislation .............................. 11 Contingent -
Labor Section
Labor in Opposition 1996 - Are Labor Ready? The previous section highlighted the consequences for Australia the last time Labor were in Government. No opposition is unelectable, and the following section analyses the consequences for Australia if Labor are returned to Government. It demonstrates: Labor lack leadership and are divided. Labor are unable to take the tough but necessary decisions in the national interest. They offer no constructive policy alternative. Labor’s opportunism and disunity means that a Labor Government would be completely lacking in direction – in fact liable to be dragged in any direction by noisy special interest groups and trade unions. Labor are not up to the task of managing the economy or of protecting Australia’s security. Labor’s preference for higher taxes and higher spending will drive up interest rates, taking money out of the pockets of families and small business. Labor and the Economy Labor’s Deficit Denial Prior to the 1996 election, the Labor Party assured Australians that the budget was in surplus: “This strategy (fiscal consolidation) has led to a small Budget surplus in 1995-96 and growing surpluses forecast over our forward estimates period”. (Kim Beazley, Third Australian Pensions and Investments Conference 29-01-96) “We’re in a position where we’ve no plans to increase taxes..…Why would we? We’re operating in surplus and our projections are for surpluses in the future.” (Kim Beazley, The Age, 1-02-96) Straight after the election, a budget deficit was revealed: Remarkably, both Kim Beazley and Simon Crean continued to deny Labor’s budget black hole (the final result for the 1995-06 financial year was a deficit of $10.3 billion), long after it was revealed: “Well look, firstly there wasn’t a $10 billion black hole. -
Scangate Document
coun ts Valuing our older workers “The evidence that unemployment kills - particularly the middle-aged - now verges on the irrefutable. Losing a job after 20 or so years working is akin to losing a loved one or a limb. How would you feel if you lost your job because of your age?" Chair of the House Employment, Education and Workplace cities and some regional centres, and convened a round table to Relations Committee, Dr Brendan Nelson (Member for Bradfield, consider developing a code of conduct on how retrenched New South Wales), reflected on this following the launch of the workers might be supported. This round table brought together report, Age counts: Issues specific to mature-age workers, on representatives from key Commonwealth agencies and peak 14 August 2000. labour and social services associations. The House Employment Committee’s inquiry grew out of its “Throughout the inquiry, the Committee was grateful that so many concern about the difficulties faced by mature-age people trying people wanted to share their own personal and emotional to re-enter the workforce or establish a business following experiences. They believed it was important that we were aware unemployment. The inquiry began in March 1999 and focused on of the incredible difficulties that face many mature-age workers social, economic and industrial issues specific to workers over 45. when unemployed,” Dr Nelson explained. “Without these honest The Committee believed these issues were not sufficiently accounts we would not have such a valuable report.” recognised and dealt with in the policy arena. Age counts contains 38 recommendations that were developed During the inquiry, the House Employment Committee received from the personal and professional experiences presented to the more than 200 submissions, held public hearings in most capital House Employment Committee. -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2014
RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2015–16 4 APRIL 2016 House of Representatives by-elections: 1901–2015 Stephen Barber Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper provides details of House of Representatives by-elections, from that held for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 5 December 2015 for North Sydney. The following observations can be made about those by-elections: • there have been 149 by-elections, an average of 3.4 per parliament • the average number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 11.6 per by- election • in only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate • an increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats • in only ten cases have the opposition party failed to contest a by-election • seventy-five of the by-elections followed the resignation of the member, 68 members died in office, there have been five voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House • since 1949 most by-elections have been caused by the resignation of the sitting member and have occurred in safe seats • on 35 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election • five of the losses have been by the opposition of the day • the average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 4.0 per cent • since 1949 the largest two-party swing against a government occurred in Canberra in 1995. The largest swing to a government occurred in McPherson in 1981.