DOCSLIB.ORG

CURRICULUM VITAE March 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CURRICULUM VITAE March 2016 PERSONAL INFORMATION Name: David R. Edds Job Title: Professor Business Address: Department of Biological Sciences Emporia State University ESU Campus Box 4050 One Kellogg Circle Emporia, KS 66801-5415 Office Telephone: 620-341-5622 Fax: 620-341-5607 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: emporia.edu/biosci/people/david-edds.html Languages: English, Nepali EDUCATION Degree Year Institution & location Major field Ph.D. 1989 Oklahoma State University Zoology Stillwater, Oklahoma (Fish ecology) Doctoral dissertation title: Multivariate analysis of fish assemblage composition and environmental correlates in a Himalayan river – Nepal's Kali Gandaki/Narayani (Major advisor A.A. Echelle) M.S. 1984 Oklahoma State University Zoology Stillwater, Oklahoma (Fish conservation genetics) Master's thesis title: The genetic structure of endangered desert fishes: natural versus captive populations (Major advisor A.A. Echelle) B.S. 1977 University of Kansas Biology Lawrence, Kansas (Systematics & Ecology) (Advisor F.B. Cross) A.A. 1974 Independence CC Liberal Arts Independence, Kansas HONORS 2015 ESU College of Liberal Arts & Sciences Excellence in Scholarship and Creativity Award 2014 Best professional paper award from Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, Edds, D., B. Smith and J. Goeckler. Zebra mussels in the Neosho River Basin. Kansas Natural Resources Conference, Wichita 2014 1st place poster award, McCullough, D., K. Hase and D. Edds, Fishes of the Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve. Kansas Academy of Science, Emporia 2014 2nd place poster award, Bilyea, J., D. Edds, S. Crupper and J. Goeckler. Early detection and distribution of the zebra mussel in La Cygne Reservoir and the Marais des Cygnes River, Kansas. Kansas Academy of Science, Emporia 2014 Dean's Award for Scholarship, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Emporia State University 2013 Roe R. Cross Distinguished Professor, Emporia State University 2013 Faculty Mentor Award, ESU Student Athlete Advisory Committee 2013 Commencement Speaker, Emporia State University 2012 1st place master’s division oral presentation. Smith, B.R., D.R. Edds and J.M. Goeckler. Lowhead dam influence on downstream zebra mussel dispersal. Kansas Academy of Science, Wichita 2012 1st place master’s division poster presentation. Smith, B.R. and D.R. Edds. Differential utilization of surfaces by colonizing zebra mussels, and the effectiveness of a foul release coating system. Kansas Academy of Science, Wichita 2012 Best student poster award – fisheries. Holoubek, N., J. Goeckler, B. Smith and D. Edds. Comparison of zebra mussel veliger sampling techniques. Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, Wichita 2011 Included in Ad Astra Kansas’ “Science in Kansas: 150 Years and Counting,” a project for the Kansas Sesquicentennial highlighting 150 Kansas scientists, past and present, with a series of trading cards. 2010 Robert L. Packard Outstanding Educator Award, Southwestern Association of Naturalists, presented to a member of the society who, in his or her career, has made significant contributions to the understanding of the biota of the southwestern United States, Mexico, and Central America through teaching or presenting scientific information to the general public. 2010 Balitora eddsi, a hillstream loach from Nepal, named in my honor by Conway & Mayden (Journal of Fish Biology 76: 1466-1473). The authors stated that “The new species is named in honour of D.R. Edds, who collected the type series, in recognition of his contribution to the knowledge of the fish fauna of Nepal.” 2009 Graduate advisee Alan Butler named ESU Durst Research Award winner 2007 Undergraduate advisee James Whitney named outstanding fisheries student in Kansas by the Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 2006 Pseudecheneis eddsi, a sucker catfish from Nepal, was named in my honor (Ng, 2006. Zootaxa 1254: 45-68). In the article, Ng stated that “This species is named after David Edds, who collected part of the type series and in honor of his work on Nepalese fishes.” 2004 Best professional poster award at 134th annual meeting of the American Fisheries Society, Madison, Wisconsin, for Tiemann, J., D. Gillette, M. Wildhaber and D. Edds. Effects of lowhead dams on fish assemblages in the Neosho River, Kansas, with emphasis on the Neosho madtom, a federally-listed threatened species 2003 ESU President’s Award for Research and Creativity 2003 Graduate student David Gillette received Laurence C. Boylan Award for the outstanding ESU master’s thesis produced during 2001-02 academic year 2002 Graduate student Jeremy Tiemann named outstanding fisheries graduate student in Kansas by the Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 2001 Graduate student David Gillette named outstanding fisheries graduate student in Kansas by the Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 1999 Graduate student John Tollefson named outstanding herpetology student in Kansas by the Kansas Herpetological Society 1998 Graduate student Chris Wilkinson named outstanding fisheries student in Kansas by Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 1997 Elected at-large member of Sigma Xi 1996 Fulbright Research Scholar, Nepal 1994 Best paper award, Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society annual meeting, Lawrence 1994 Former graduate student Paul Shipman named outstanding student of Kansas herpetology by the Kansas Herpetological Society 1993 Dean's Award for Scholarship, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Emporia State University 1993 Graduate student Jay Jeffrey honorable mention Skinner Memorial Award, American Fisheries Society 1993 Graduate student Jay Jeffrey named outstanding fisheries student in Kansas by the Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 1993 Undergraduate advisee Daren Riedle named outstanding herpetology student in Kansas by the Kansas Herpetological Society 1992 Graduate student Linda Fuselier recipient of Skinner Memorial Award, American Fisheries Society 1992 Graduate student Linda Fuselier named outstanding fisheries student in Kansas by the Kansas Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 1989 Runner-up, Phoenix Award, Outstanding Graduate Student, Oklahoma State University 1988 Top Ten Finalist, Phoenix Award, Outstanding Graduate Student, Oklahoma State University 1987 Outstanding Graduate Student Award, Department of Zoology, Oklahoma State University 1984 Selected to Phi Kappa Phi 1984-85 Pre-doctoral Fulbright Scholar, Nepal 1983 Ken Johnston Award from National Wildlife Federation/Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation as outstanding fisheries student in Oklahoma PEER-REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS B.R. Smith, D.R. Edds and J.M. Goeckler. 2016. Distribution and density of zebra mussels in four Kansas reservoirs. Southwestern Naturalist 61(1): in press. B.R. Smith, D.R. Edds and J.M. Goeckler. 2015. Lowhead dams and the downstream dispersal of zebra mussels. Hydrobiologia 755: 1-12. Delmott, S.E. and D.R. Edds. 2014. Zebra mussel maturation and seasonal gametogenesis in Marion Reservoir, KS, USA. BioInvasions Records 3(4): 247-260. Smith, B.R. and D.R. Edds. 2014. Zebra mussel colonization of construction materials, and effectiveness of a foul release coating. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 117(3-4): 159-166. Holoubek, N.S., J.M. Goeckler, B.R. Smith and D.R. Edds. 2014. Comparison of zebra mussel veliger laboratory enumeration and sampling techniques. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 117(1-2): 69-75. Shrestha, O.H. and D.R. Edds. 2012. Fishes of Nepal: Mapping distributions based on voucher specimens. Emporia State Research Studies 48(2): 14-74. Conway, K.W., R.L. Mayden, J. Shrestha and D.R. Edds. 2012. Redescription of the Nepalese endemic torrent minnow Psilorhynchus pseudecheneis with comments on P. homaloptera (Teleostei: Psilorhynchidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 23(2): 193-210. Conway, K.W., D.R. Edds, J. Shrestha and R.L. Mayden. 2011. A new species of gravel-dwelling loach (Ostariophysi: Nemacheilidae) from the Nepalese Himalayan foothills. Journal of Fish Biology 79(7): 1746-1759. Edds, D.R. 2007. Fishes in Nepal: ichthyofaunal surveys in seven nature reserves. Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 18(3): 277-287. Edds, D.R. and H.H. Ng. 2007. Additions to the ichthyofauna of Nepal, with a redescription of Neoeucirrhichthys maydelli (Teleostei: Cobitidae). Ichthyological Exploration of Freshwaters 18(2): 125-132. Gillette, D.P., J.S. Tiemann, D.R. Edds and M.L. Wildhaber. 2006. Habitat use by a Midwestern U.S.A. riverine fish assemblage: effects of season, water temperature and river discharge. Journal of Fish Biology 68(5): 1494-1512. Gillette, D.P., J.S. Tiemann, D.R. Edds and M.L. Wildhaber. 2005. Spatiotemporal patterns of fish assemblage structure in a river impounded by low-head dams. Copeia 2005(3): 539-549. Tiemann, J.S., D.P. Gillette, M.L. Wildhaber and D.R. Edds. 2005. Effects of lowhead dams on the ephemeropterans, plecopterans, and trichopterans group in a North American river. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 20(3): 519-525. Combes, M. and D. Edds. 2005. Mussel assemblages upstream from three Kansas reservoirs. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 20(1): 139-148. Haslouer, S.G., M.E. Eberle, D.R. Edds, K.B. Gido, C.S. Mammoliti, J.R. Triplett, J.T. Collins, D.A. Distler, D.G. Huggins and W.J. Stark. 2005. Current status of native fish species in Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 108(1-2): 32-46. Ng, H.H. and D.R. Edds. 2005. Two new species of Pseudecheneis, rheophilic catfishes (Teleostei:
Recommended publications
  • Habitat Suitability and Detection Probability of Longnose Darter (Percina Nasuta) in Oklahoma

    Habitat Suitability and Detection Probability of Longnose Darter (Percina Nasuta) in Oklahoma

    HABITAT SUITABILITY AND DETECTION PROBABILITY OF LONGNOSE DARTER (PERCINA NASUTA) IN OKLAHOMA By COLT TAYLOR HOLLEY Bachelor of Science in Natural Resource Ecology and Management Oklahoma State University Stillwater, OK 2016 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2018 HABITAT SUITABILITY AND DETECTION PROBABILITY OF LONGNOSE DARTER (PERCINA NASUTA) IN OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Dr. James M. Long Thesis Advisor Dr. Shannon Brewer Dr. Monica Papeş ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am truly thankful for the support of my advisor, Dr. Jim Long, throughout my time at Oklahoma State University. His motivation and confidence in me was invaluable. I also thank my committee members Dr. Shannon Brewer and Dr. Mona Papeş for their contributions to my education and for their comments that improved this thesis. I thank the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC) for providing the funding for this project and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit (OKCFWRU) for their logistical support. I thank Tommy Hall, James Mier, Bill Rogers, Dick Rogers, and Mr. and Mrs. Terry Scott for allowing me to access Lee Creek from their properties. Much of my research could not have been accomplished without them. My field technicians Josh, Matt, and Erick made each field season enjoyable and I could not have done it without their help. The camaraderie of my friends and fellow graduate students made my time in Stillwater feel like home. I consider Dr. Andrew Taylor to be a mentor, fishing partner, and one of my closest friends.
  • Endangered Species

    Endangered Species

    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
  • Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report

    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
  • Puntius Terio) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Puntius Terio) Ecological Risk Screening Summary

    Onespot Barb (Puntius terio) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2013 Revised, March 2019 Web Version, 8/7/2019 Photo: The International Barcode of Life Consortium. Licensed under Creative Commons BY. Available: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/2251398993. (August 7, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Asia: Pakistan, India, Bangladesh [Talwar and Jhingran 1991] and Myanmar [Menon 1999].” 1 From Dahanukar (2010): “Puntius terio occurs widely in northern India (Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Assam, West Bengal, Orissa, Manipur, and Meghalaya), Bangladesh and Pakistan (Jayaram 1991). Recently recorded from Nepal [considered to be a previously unrecorded part of the native range] (Edds and Ng 2007).” Status in the United States There are no records of Puntius terio in the wild or in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States There are no records of Puntius terio in the wild in the United States. Remarks No additional remarks. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From Fricke et al. (2019): “Current status: Valid as Puntius terio (Hamilton 1822).” From ITIS (2019): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Ostariophysi Order Cypriniformes Superfamily Cyprinoidea Family Cyprinidae Genus Puntius Species Puntius terio (Hamilton, 1822)” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Max length : 10.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Menon 1999]” 2 Environment From Froese and Pauly (2019): “Freshwater; benthopelagic; pH range: 7.0 - 8.0; dH range: 15 - 30.
  • PHYLOGENY and ZOOGEOGRAPHY of the SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, Title CYPRINIFORMES)

    PHYLOGENY and ZOOGEOGRAPHY of the SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, Title CYPRINIFORMES)

    PHYLOGENY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, Title CYPRINIFORMES) Author(s) SAWADA, Yukio Citation MEMOIRS OF THE FACULTY OF FISHERIES HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY, 28(2), 65-223 Issue Date 1982-03 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/21871 Type bulletin (article) File Information 28(2)_P65-223.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP PHYLOGENY AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY OF THE SUPERFAMILY COBITOIDEA (CYPRINOIDEI, CYPRINIFORMES) By Yukio SAWADA Laboratory of Marine Zoology, Faculty of Fisheries, Bokkaido University Contents page I. Introduction .......................................................... 65 II. Materials and Methods ............... • • . • . • . • • . • . 67 m. Acknowledgements...................................................... 70 IV. Methodology ....................................•....•.........•••.... 71 1. Systematic methodology . • • . • • . • • • . 71 1) The determinlttion of polarity in the morphocline . • . 72 2) The elimination of convergence and parallelism from phylogeny ........ 76 2. Zoogeographical methodology . 76 V. Comparative Osteology and Discussion 1. Cranium.............................................................. 78 2. Mandibular arch ...................................................... 101 3. Hyoid arch .......................................................... 108 4. Branchial apparatus ...................................•..••......••.. 113 5. Suspensorium.......................................................... 120 6. Pectoral
  • The Endangered White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa)

    The Endangered White Sands Pupfish (Cyprinodon Tularosa)

    The Endangered White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa) genome reveals low diversity and heterogenous patterns of differentiation Andrew Black1, Janna Willoughby2, Anna Br¨uniche-Olsen3, Brian Pierce4, and Andrew DeWoody1 1Purdue University 2Auburn University 3University of Copenhagen 4Texas A and M University College Station November 24, 2020 Abstract The White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa), endemic to New Mexico in Southwestern North America, is of conservation concern due in part to invasive species, chemical pollution, and groundwater withdrawal. Herein, we developed a high quality draft reference genome and use it to provide biological insights into the evolution and conservation of C. tularosa. Specifically, we localized microsatellite markers previously used to demarcate Evolutionary Significant Units, evaluated the possibility of introgression into the C. tularosa genome, and compared genomic diversity among related species. The de novo assembly of PacBio Sequel II error-corrected reads resulted in a 1.08Gb draft genome with a contig N50 of 1.4Mb and 25,260 annotated protein coding genes, including 95% of the expected Actinopterigii conserved orthologs. Many of the previously described C. tularosa microsatellite markers fell within or near genes and exhibited a pattern of increased heterozygosity near genic areas compared to those in intergenic regions. Genetic distances between C. tularosa and the widespread invasive species C. variegatus, which diverged ~1.6-4.7 MYA, were 0.027 (nuclear) and 0.022 (mitochondrial). Nuclear alignments revealed putative tracts of introgression that merit further investigation. Genome-wide heterozygosity was markedly lower in C. tularosa compared to estimates from related species, likely because of smaller long-term effective population sizes constrained by their isolated and limited habitat.
  • Review Article Cyprinodontid Fishes of the World

    Review Article Cyprinodontid Fishes of the World

    Archive ofIran. SID J. Ichthyol. (March 2018), 5(1): 1–29 Received: January 5, 2018 © 2018 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: March 1, 2018 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.22034/iji.v5i1.267 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review Article Cyprinodontid fishes of the world: an updated list of taxonomy, distribution and conservation status (Teleostei: Cyprinodontoidea) Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Tayebeh ASRAR1, Ali GHOLAMIFARD2 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Lorestan University, 6815144316 Khorramabad, Iran. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to list all the reported cyprinodontid fishes (superfamily Cyprinodontoidea/pupfishes) of the world. It lists 141 species in 8 genera and 4 families. The most diverse family is Cyprinodontidae (54 species, 38%), followed by Orestiidae (45 species, 32%), Aphaniidae (39 species, 28%), and Cubanichthyidae (3 species, 2%). Among 141 listed species, 73 (51.8%) species are Not Evaluated (NE), 15 (10.6%) Least Concern (LC), 9 (6.4%) Vulnerable (VU), 3 (2.1%) Data Deficient (DD), 11 (7.8%) Critically Endangered (CR), 4 (2.8%) Near Threatened (NT), 18 (12.8%) Endangered (EN), 3 (2.1%) Extinct in the Wild (EW) and 5 (3.5%) Extinct of the Red List of IUCN. They inhabit in the fresh, brackish and marine waters of the United States, Middle America, the West Indies, parts of northern South America, North Africa, the Mediterranean Anatolian region, coastal areas of the Persian Gulf and Makran Sea (Oman Sea), the northern Arabian Sea east to Gujarat in India, and some endorheic basins of Iran, Pakistan and the Arabian Peninsula.
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015

    Red List of Bangladesh 2015

    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
  • Download Article (PDF)

    Download Article (PDF)

    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION OCCASIO AL PAPER NO. 32 of h Zoologl al ur y 0 India On he Systematic of the In~i n Fi he of the Gen Lepidocephalus Blee er with Keys to t e Species of he Genu and Ge era of t e Subfamilies Doli· lae and Cobitinae ( Cobi idae : Cyprillifo mes ) By AJ ILAK AD. A LAQ HUSAIN Issued by the Director Zoological Survey of India. Calcutta RECORDS OF THE Zoological Survey of India MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 32 ON THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE INDIAN FISHES OF THE GENUS LEPIDeCEPHALUS BLEEKER WITH KEYS TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS AND GENERA OF THE SUBFAMILIES BOTIINAE AND COBITINAE (COBITIDAE: CYPRINIFORMES) By Raj Tilak and Akhlaq Husain Zoological Survey of India, Northern Regional Station, Dehra Dun Edited by the Director, Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta 1981 © Copyright 1981, Government of India Published in September, 1981 PRICE Inland: Rs. 18.00 Foreign: £ 2.00 $ 6.00 Printed in India at SAAKl-ll-lAR MVDRAN 4 Deshaprart Shastnal Road Calcutta 700 O~~\ and Published by the Controller of Publications Civil Lines Delhi 110006 RECORDS OF THE Zoological Survey of India MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 32 No. 32 1981 Pages 1-42 CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION I SYSTEMATIC NOTES 7 KEY TO THE GENERA OF THE COBlllD fISHES WITH A SUBORBITAL SPINE .. , 28 KEY TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIAN SPECIES OF THE GENUS Lepidocephalus BLEEKER 30 SUMMARY 32 ACKNOWLEDGE MEN rs 33 REFERENCES 34 ON THE SYSTEMATICS OF THE INDIAN FISHES OF THE GENUS LEPIDOCEPHALUS BLEEKER WITH KEYS TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS AND
  • Checklist of Kansas Fishes

    Checklist of Kansas Fishes

    CHECKLIST OF KANSAS FISHES From "A Checklist of the Vertebrate Animals of Kansas", second edition, 1999, by George Potts, Joseph Collins and Kate Shaw (Species marked with an asterisk * are extirpated from the wild in Kansas.) 142 Species REFERENCE: Fishes in Kansas, 2nd edition, 1995 By Frank Cross and Joseph Collins, KU Press Order of Lampreys (Petromyzontiformes) Family Petromyzontidae Chestnut Lamprey - Ichthyomyzon castaneus Order of Sturgeons and Paddlefish (Acipenseriformes) Family Acipenseridae Lake Sturgeon - Acipenser fulvescens Pallid Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus albus Shovelnose Sturgeon - Scaphirhynchus platorynchus Family Polyodontidae Paddlefish - Polyodon spathula Order of Gars (Semionotiformes) Family Lepisosteidae Spotted Gar - Lepisosteus oculatus Longnose Gar - Lepisosteus osseus Shortnose Gar - Lepisosteus platostomus Order of Bowfins (Amiiformes) Family Amiidae Bowfin - Amia calva Order of Bony-tongued fishes (Osteoglossiformes) Family Hiodontidae Goldeye - Hiodon alosoides * Mooneye - Hiodon tergisus Order of Eels (Anguilliformes) Family Anguillidae American Eel - Anguilla rostrata Order of Herrings (Clupeiformes) Family Clupeidae Skipjack Herring - Alosa chrysochloris Gizzard Shad - Dorosoma cepedianum Threadfin Shad - Dorosoma petenense Page 1 of 5 Order of Carp-like fishes (Cypriniformes) Family Cyprinidae Central Stoneroller - Campostoma anomalum Goldfish - Carassius auratus Grass Carp - Ctenopharyngodon idella Bluntface Shiner - Cyprinella camura Red Shiner - Cyprinella lutrensis Spotfin Shiner - Cyprinella spiloptera
  • Comanche Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon Elegans)

    Comanche Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon Elegans)

    Comanche Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo Credit: Uvalde National Fish Hatchery, USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office Austin, TX August 2013 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Comanche Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................... 2 1.1 Reviewers ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: ............................................................................................. 3 1.3 Methodology Used To Complete the Review .................................................................. 3 1.4 Background ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy ............................... 4 2.2 Recovery Criteria ............................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status ............................................................ 5 2.4 Synthesis........................................................................................................................
  • Programmatic Evaluation: Activities of The

    Programmatic Evaluation: Activities of The

    Programmatic Evaluation ACTIVITIES OF THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE FISHERIES PROGRAM Sport Fishing FY 2005–2009 and Boating Partnership Council SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL Sport Fishing & Boating Partnership Council Programmatic Evaluation Activities of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fisheries Program FY 2005–2009 Report of the 2009 Ad Hoc Evaluation Team to the Sport Fishing and Boating Partnership Council June 21, 2010 PROGRAMMATIC ASSESSMENT OF THE FISHERIES PROGRAM SPORT FISHING AND BOATING PARTNERSHIP COUNCIL Table of Contents Report Summary and Findings i Introduction 1 Conduct of the Evaluation 2 PROGRAMMATIC EVALUATION 1. Accountability 9 Context 9 Basis for Evaluation 10 Results 11 Accountability to Authorities 11 Accountability to Stakeholders and Partners 13 Accountability to Open, Interactive Communication 15 Accountability through Performance Reporting Systems 15 Findings and Observations 18 Recommendations to Increase Effectiveness 20 2. Habitat Conservation and Management 21 Context 21 Basis for Evaluation 22 Results 23 National Fish Habitat Action Plan 23 National Fish Passage Program 28 Fish and Wildlife Conservation Offices 30 Findings and Observations 33 Recommendations to Increase Effectiveness 34 3. Species Conservation and Management 35 Context 35 Basis for Evaluation 35 Results 36 Native Species 36 Robust Redhorse Conservation Efforts (Box) 39 Interjurisdictional Species 39 Aquatic Invasive Species 40 Findings and Observations 43 Recommendations to Increase Effectiveness 45 4. Cooperation