DOCSLIB.ORG

P2P Cryptocurrency Exchange and Blockchain Size Reduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
P2P Cryptocurrency Exchange and Blockchain Size Reduction Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics P2P Cryptocurrency Exchange and Blockchain Size Reduction Ph.D. Thesis Proposal Michal Zima Advisor: Eva Hladká Brno, Autumn 2017 Signature of Thesis Advisor Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries in Bitcoin Blockchain 4 2.1 Blockchain ...........................4 2.2 Merkle Trees ..........................7 2.3 Transaction Structure .....................8 2.4 Scripting ...........................9 2.5 Simple Payment Validation .................. 10 2.6 Spendability of Transactions ................. 10 3 State of the Art 12 3.1 Exchanging Cryptocurrencies without Intermediaries .... 12 3.2 Pruning of Merkle Trees ................... 14 3.3 Pruning with UTXO Set ................... 15 3.4 Redactable Blockchain ..................... 16 3.5 Mini-blockchain ........................ 16 3.6 UTXO Set Commitment ................... 18 3.7 Merged Mining ........................ 19 4 Aims of the Thesis 21 4.1 Objectives and Expected Results ............... 21 4.2 Plan of Work ......................... 22 5 Achieved Results 24 5.1 Decentralisation of Cryptocurrency Exchange ........ 24 5.2 Scheme of Sustainable Blockchain .............. 25 5.3 Hash Reduction ........................ 27 6 Author’s Publications 29 Bibliography 30 A Publications 35 A.1 Cryptography Enhanced Ad-Hoc Approach to P2P Overlays 36 A.2 Coincer: Decentralised Trustless Platform for Exchanging Decentralised Cryptocurrencies ................ 42 i 1 Introduction Digital money was for a long time a goal of many efforts. Indistin- guishability of originals from copies served as the most challenging point. There had to be a central database system that allowed verifi- cation of money and execution of transfers. Naturally, this approach caused concerns about users’ privacy. David Chaum in 1990 addressed this issue by introducing a cryptographic approach to anonymous digital money [1]. Nonetheless, it was not until Satoshi Nakamoto invented Bitcoin in 2008 that anonymous digital money came into general use. Using a novel combination of several known cryptographic primitives and P2P networking he devised trustless digital money which lacks any central authority or centralised database. Being a new approach to digital money, Bitcoin also brought new challenges. One of them has been its scalability in recent years. As of early 2017 Bitcoin’s distributed database (called blockchain) is capable of storing 1MB of data per 10 minutes on average, which translates into approximately 3–4 transactions per second1. For comparison, PayPal processed 200 transactions per second on average in 2016 [2] and Visa 2,600 transactions per second [3]. Since popularity of Bitcoin rises (evidenced also by its rising ex- change rate to traditional fiat currencies [4]), this throughput limitation becomes more visible. There are also SPAM attacks against Bitcoin [5] that cause transaction fees to rise for ordinary users to get their transactions verified. Proposals for scaling Bitcoin in general revolve around increasing the main limit of 1MB per 10 minutes (either di- rectly [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12] or only effectively [13]), although this is not the only proposed measure. While this may lessen current issues, it may as well worsen other aspects. The Bitcoin blockchain is designed as an ever growing storage that contains all transactions since Bitcoin’s inception. Due to this fact, the blockchain size is at 119GiB as of July 2017. The aforementioned limit restricts the growth to approximately 49GiB per year. Growth of blockchain size can be observed on Fig. 1.1 and while it may seem to grow exponentially, the 49GiB limit says that it is in fact on linear 1. Given the average size of a transaction in 2016 of 515 bytes. 1 1. Introduction 140 Bitcoin blockchain size 120 100 80 GB 60 40 20 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Time Figure 1.1: Cumulative size of the raw blockchain data. growth trajectory in 2017. Yet the steepness of the linear curve slowly starts to change as of August 2017 with deployment of a new scaling approach called Segregated Witness [13]. While it is said [14] that Bitcoin nodes may only store small block- chain metadata (amounting to 36MiB as of July 2017) and not the whole data, there is a trade-off between the size of the stored data on one side and security and privacy on the other. Moreover, these lightweight nodes cannot exist on their own—they depend on other nodes (so called full nodes) that do store the full blockchain data. However, with such a growth it becomes increasingly costly to run a full node. Besides the storage itself, among rising demands are bandwidth, computational resources (due to the need to verify all the data) and time for initial synchronisation with the Bitcoin network. As a result, less nodes can afford to be full nodes, thence decentralisation suffers. An obvious way towards solving this issue is through pruning the blockchain data from data that should not be needed anymore, i. e., data of already spent transactions as described in Sect. 7 of [14]. This 2 1. Introduction approach serves as a basis for further approaches, nonetheless, it does not stop the blockchain from unbounded growth in size. There are many transactions that we know cannot be ever spent (for instance [15]), but from computational point of view it is an undecidable prob- lem. Besides centralisation risks stemming from blockchain growth, cryptocurrencies suffer from centralisation on a level of entry and exit points for users—cryptocurrency exchanges [16]. Success of the Bitcoin model led to emergence of countless alternative cryptocur- rencies following the principles of Bitcoin. A natural consequence was demand of their users to exchange and trade these cryptocurren- cies which further led to a rise of many exchange platforms focused specifically on cryptocurrencies. Centralisation to a limited number of exchanges attracts attackers who successfully exploit vulnerabilities in the platforms, which accounts for more than 26 million USD of losses as of 2017 [17]. To date, various approaches were developed. There are methods for exchanges to easily prove their solvency [18, 19], but neither they were widely adopted nor they could solve the aforementioned prob- lem. Different approach is to completely remove intermediaries from the process of exchanging cryptocurrencies. However, even though the first solution was proposed in 2013 [20], due to its real-world limi- tations it has never had any practical, decentralised implementation. Aim of my work is focused on two important challenges that can improve decentralisation of cryptocurrencies ecosystem. First, I plan to develop a set of network and cryptocurrency protocols for safe decentralised trading of different cryptocurrencies. My second goal is to propose both technical and incentive mechanisms for maintaining a blockchain with a bounded size. The remainder of this thesis proposal is organised as follows. In- troduction to the area of blockchain and cryptocurrencies is given in Chap. 2. Chapter 3 describes state-of-the-art decentralised cryptocur- rency exchange and blockchain minification approaches. Chapter 4 sets goals of my work and outlines a time plan for them. An overview of achieved results is provided in Chap. 5, followed by a list of publi- cations in Chap. 6. The proposal concludes with a bibliography and a selection of my published papers. 3 2 Preliminaries in Bitcoin Blockchain This chapter introduces the terminology and the basics of Bitcoin and blockchain. 2.1 Blockchain Blockchain is a database of transactional data. It is a decentralised system without any central coordinator where all data are distributed over a network of interconnected nodes. This eliminates the need for trusted parties as each node can independently verify integrity and validity of all stored data by themselves. Since contents of blockchain are shared among all nodes in its network, it is important that it converges to a single shared state. This is achieved by grouping transactions into blocks every 10 minutes on average. Hence, the blocks fulfil a role of synchronisation points. Blocks form a chain by being linked into a hash chain: each block (except the first one, so called genesis block) includes a link (i. e., hash) of the previous block, as illustrated in Fig. 2.1. An important property inherited from a regular hash chain is immutability of stored data. To change a block inside a hash chain, it is required to also update all links to previous blocks inside blocks following the changed block. The change is therefore easily detectable. 2.1.1 Mining/Proof of Work Practical immutability of blockchain data is secured by a condition that each block’s hash1 has to meet requirements for a proof of work. 1. In this work all mentions of “hash” mean output of a cryptographic hash function, e. g., SHA-2. h(root) h(node 1) h(node 2) root node 1 node 2 node 3 (node 0) Figure 2.1: Illustration of the hash chain/blockchain structure: hash of each node in the chain is influenced by contents of all preceding nodes through their direct predecessor’s hash. 4 2. Preliminaries in Bitcoin Blockchain Proof of work is a mechanism that certifies that a certain amount of computational work was performed. In Bitcoin, the proof of work consists of a double SHA-256 hash of a block header. The bitcoin protocol computes in a decentralised manner a difficulty of the required proof. The difficulty is a parameter that sets a constraint on the value of the proof of work hash. Every 2016 blocks the difficulty gets adjusted by the network so that the interval between blocks is on average 10 minutes, regardless of the computational power dedicated for mining. Mining is a process of finding a valid proof of work hash by iterating through anonce space in the block header. 2.1.2 51% attack Security of Bitcoin lies to some extent on economic incentives. Miners are motivated to behave honestly and work on a single, longest chain of blocks.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bitcoin Tumbles As Miners Face Crackdown - the Buttonwood Tree Bitcoin Tumbles As Miners Face Crackdown
    6/8/2021 Bitcoin Tumbles as Miners Face Crackdown - The Buttonwood Tree Bitcoin Tumbles as Miners Face Crackdown By Haley Cafarella - June 1, 2021 Bitcoin tumbles as Crypto miners face crackdown from China. Cryptocurrency miners, including HashCow and BTC.TOP, have halted all or part of their China operations. This comes after Beijing intensified a crackdown on bitcoin mining and trading. Beijing intends to hammer digital currencies amid heightened global regulatory scrutiny. This marks the first time China’s cabinet has targeted virtual currency mining, which is a sizable business in the world’s second-biggest economy. Some estimates say China accounts for as much as 70 percent of the world’s crypto supply. Cryptocurrency exchange Huobi suspended both crypto-mining and some trading services to new clients from China. The plan is that China will instead focus on overseas businesses. BTC.TOP, a crypto mining pool, also announced the suspension of its China business citing regulatory risks. On top of that, crypto miner HashCow said it would halt buying new bitcoin mining rigs. Crypto miners use specially-designed computer equipment, or rigs, to verify virtual coin transactions. READ MORE: Sustainable Mineral Exploration Powers Electric Vehicle Revolution This process produces newly minted crypto currencies like bitcoin. “Crypto mining consumes a lot of energy, which runs counter to China’s carbon neutrality goals,” said Chen Jiahe, chief investment officer of Beijing-based family office Novem Arcae Technologies. Additionally, he said this is part of China’s goal of curbing speculative crypto trading. As result, bitcoin has taken a beating in the stock market.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrency: the Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues
    Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and Selected Policy Issues Updated April 9, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45427 SUMMARY R45427 Cryptocurrency: The Economics of Money and April 9, 2020 Selected Policy Issues David W. Perkins Cryptocurrencies are digital money in electronic payment systems that generally do not require Specialist in government backing or the involvement of an intermediary, such as a bank. Instead, users of the Macroeconomic Policy system validate payments using certain protocols. Since the 2008 invention of the first cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies have proliferated. In recent years, they experienced a rapid increase and subsequent decrease in value. One estimate found that, as of March 2020, there were more than 5,100 different cryptocurrencies worth about $231 billion. Given this rapid growth and volatility, cryptocurrencies have drawn the attention of the public and policymakers. A particularly notable feature of cryptocurrencies is their potential to act as an alternative form of money. Historically, money has either had intrinsic value or derived value from government decree. Using money electronically generally has involved using the private ledgers and systems of at least one trusted intermediary. Cryptocurrencies, by contrast, generally employ user agreement, a network of users, and cryptographic protocols to achieve valid transfers of value. Cryptocurrency users typically use a pseudonymous address to identify each other and a passcode or private key to make changes to a public ledger in order to transfer value between accounts. Other computers in the network validate these transfers. Through this use of blockchain technology, cryptocurrency systems protect their public ledgers of accounts against manipulation, so that users can only send cryptocurrency to which they have access, thus allowing users to make valid transfers without a centralized, trusted intermediary.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation
    Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation Third Edition Contributing Editor: Josias N. Dewey Global Legal Insights Blockchain & Cryptocurrency Regulation 2021, Third Edition Contributing Editor: Josias N. Dewey Published by Global Legal Group GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – BLOCKCHAIN & CRYPTOCURRENCY REGULATION 2021, THIRD EDITION Contributing Editor Josias N. Dewey, Holland & Knight LLP Head of Production Suzie Levy Senior Editor Sam Friend Sub Editor Megan Hylton Consulting Group Publisher Rory Smith Chief Media Officer Fraser Allan We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Josias N. Dewey of Holland & Knight LLP for all of his assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2020 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-83918-077-4 ISSN 2631-2999 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. Printed and bound by TJ International, Trecerus Industrial Estate, Padstow, Cornwall, PL28 8RW October 2020 PREFACE nother year has passed and virtual currency and other blockchain-based digital assets continue to attract the attention of policymakers across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigative Study of Cryptocurrency Abuses in the Dark Web
    Cybercriminal Minds: An investigative study of cryptocurrency abuses in the Dark Web Seunghyeon Leeyz Changhoon Yoonz Heedo Kangy Yeonkeun Kimy Yongdae Kimy Dongsu Hany Sooel Sony Seungwon Shinyz yKAIST zS2W LAB Inc. {seunghyeon, kangheedo, yeonk, yongdaek, dhan.ee, sl.son, claude}@kaist.ac.kr {cy}@s2wlab.com Abstract—The Dark Web is notorious for being a major known as one of the major drug trading sites [13], [22], and distribution channel of harmful content as well as unlawful goods. WannaCry malware, one of the most notorious ransomware, Perpetrators have also used cryptocurrencies to conduct illicit has actively used the Dark Web to operate C&C servers [50]. financial transactions while hiding their identities. The limited Cryptocurrency also presents a similar situation. Apart from coverage and outdated data of the Dark Web in previous studies a centralized server, cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin [58] and motivated us to conduct an in-depth investigative study to under- Ethereum [72]) enable people to conduct peer-to-peer trades stand how perpetrators abuse cryptocurrencies in the Dark Web. We designed and implemented MFScope, a new framework which without central authorities, and thus it is hard to identify collects Dark Web data, extracts cryptocurrency information, and trading peers. analyzes their usage characteristics on the Dark Web. Specifically, Similar to the case of the Dark Web, cryptocurrencies MFScope collected more than 27 million dark webpages and also provide benefits to our society in that they can redesign extracted around 10 million unique cryptocurrency addresses for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Monero. It then classified their usages to financial trading mechanisms and thus motivate new business identify trades of illicit goods and traced cryptocurrency money models, but are also adopted in financial crimes (e.g., money flows, to reveal black money operations on the Dark Web.
    [Show full text]
  • Application-Of-Kraken-Financial-For
    October 5, 2020 SENT VIA E-MAIL Stephanie Martin, Esq. Senior Associate General Counsel Federal Reserve Board 20th & C Streets NW Washington, DC 20551 Re: Application of Kraken Financial for Access to Federal Reserve Account and Payments System Services Dear Ms. Martin: The Clearing House Payments Company (“The Clearing House”) and The Clearing House Association, American Bankers Association, Bank Policy Institute, Consumer Bankers Association, Credit Union National Association, Independent Community Bankers of America, Nacha, and National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions (collectively, the “Associations”) write to express concern over the potential application of Kraken Financial for access to a Federal Reserve account and payments system services. The Clearing House, as the private sector operator of the nation’s payments systems, and the Associations, as the trade associations representing users of the payments systems operated by both The Clearing House and the Federal Reserve Banks, are concerned that the nature of the business engaged in by Kraken Financial presents heightened risks that should be taken into consideration in determining whether the Federal Reserve should grant such access, and, if granted, on what conditions. Kraken Financial was formed as the result of a new and unique special purpose depository institution (“SPDI”) charter recently established under Wyoming law that appears to be targeted to cryptocurrency businesses.1 Kraken Financial presents a business model that is 1San Francisco based Kraken appears to have obtained the SPDI charter from Wyoming after previously running afoul of New York’s Virtual Currency Business Activity licensing requirements. Forbes, “New York Attorney General Warns that Kraken Cryptocurrency Exchange Could be Violating Regulations” (Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Facilitating Cross-Chain Cryptocurrency Exchanges: an Inquiry Into Blockchain Technology and Interoperability with an Emphasis on Cryptocurrency Arbitrage
    Eastern Michigan University DigitalCommons@EMU Senior Honors Theses & Projects Honors College 2020 Facilitating cross-chain cryptocurrency exchanges: An inquiry into blockchain technology and interoperability with an emphasis on cryptocurrency arbitrage Samuel Grone Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.emich.edu/honors Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Facilitating cross-chain cryptocurrency exchanges: An inquiry into blockchain technology and interoperability with an emphasis on cryptocurrency arbitrage Abstract Since the introduction and proliferation of the blockchain-based cryptocurrency Bitcoin, alternative cryptocurrencies also based on blockchain technology have exploded in number. It was once believed that one, or very few, cryptocurrencies would eventually dominate the market and drive out competitors. This assumption, however, was incorrect. Thousands of cryptocurrencies exist concurrently. The vast number of cryptocurrencies leads to a problem—what if the cryptocurrency that an individual possesses does not meet their current needs as well as another cryptocurrency might? The attempt to solve this problem has led to the rise of many cryptocurrency exchanges and exchange schemes. In this paper, we will discuss the motivations for an individual to be interested in exchanging two or more cryptocurrencies by describing and comparing various popular cryptocurrencies with different desirable attributes. While we will discuss these attributes, this paper will give special focus to arbitrage in particular. In addition, we will describe various cryptocurrency exchange schemes and their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we contribute to the understanding of cryptocurrency exchangeability and interoperability by comparing the historical price data of several cryptocurrencies to determine how often arbitrage has been possible in the past. Degree Type Open Access Senior Honors Thesis Department Computer Science First Advisor Weitian Tong Second Advisor S.
    [Show full text]
  • Blockchain Investment Banking
    BLOCKCHAIN INVESTMENT BANKIN G Whitepaper v.4.08 1 Contents Introduction 6 Banking 6 Our multi-currency exchange 6 Our investment platform 7 The Azbit.ID secure identification system 7 Problems and solutions 8 Tighter regulation of cryptocurrencies and ICOs 8 Regulatory complexity 8 Solution 9 Banking 9 The complicated relationship between the banking and cryptocurrency sectors 9 Payment cards 9 Banking services 10 Regulatory pressure on banks and payment systems 10 Solution 11 Exchanges 11 Challenges faced by cryptocurrency services 11 High-quality technical support 11 Listing new instruments 11 Readiness for explosive growth 12 2 Comprehensive initial functionality and a high-quality solution 12 Security and fault tolerance 12 Security and utility tokens 13 Solution 13 Alternative Trading System 14 A decentralized exchange and simplified token listing 14 Our investment platform 14 The attractiveness and dangers of cryptocurrency investment 14 Investors’ lack of knowledge and information 16 Risks associated with cryptocurrency funds 17 Challenges faced by managing traders 17 Solution 17 Benefits of the investment platform for investors 17 Benefits of the investment platform for traders 18 Benefits for affiliates and thought leaders 18 Functionality 19 Banking 19 Account services and payments (SWIFT, SEPA) 20 Payments and accounts in national currencies 20 Fiat payment services 20 Custodial accounts 20 Segregated accounts 20 Issuing and processing debit cards. Contactless payments 21 Cryptocurrency portfolio-backed P2P lending 21 3 P2P
    [Show full text]
  • SBN 206441) CONSENSUS LAW 2 5245 Av
    Case 3:20-cv-08034 Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 197 1 Pavel I. Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq. (SBN 206441) CONSENSUS LAW 2 5245 Av. Isla Verde 3 Suite 302 Carolina, PR 00979 4 United States of America Telephone: (650) 469-3750 5 Facsimile: (650) 472-8961 Email: [email protected] 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Păun Gabriel-Razvan 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 Păun Gabriel-Razvan, Case No. 3:20-cv-08034 13 COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY TO Plaintiff, CONDUCT AND CONDUCTING 14 ENTERPRISE’S AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING 15 ACTIVITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 v. U.S.C. §§ 1962(d) AND (c) (RICO), 16 CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKET MANIPULATION IN VIOLATION OF 7 17 U.S.C. § 9(1) (USE OF DECEPTIVE OR HDR Global Trading Limited (A.K.A. MANIPULATIVE DEVICE), 7 U.S.C. §§ 18 BitMEX), ABS Global Trading Limited, 9(3) AND 13(a)(2) (PRICE Grape Park LLC, Mark Sweep LLC, MANIPULATION), PRINCIPAL 19 Unknown Exchange, Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, AGENT LIABILITY, AIDING AND Samuel Reed, Agata Maria Reed (A.K.A. ABETTING PRICE MANIPULATION 20 Agata Maria Kasza), Barbara A. Reed and IN VIOLATION OF 7 U.S.C. § 25(a)(1), Trace L. Reed, NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, CIVIL 21 CONSPIRACY, UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF CAL. 22 Defendants. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 ET SEQ, UNJUST ENRICHMENT 23 (RESTITUTION), CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST, ACCOUNTING, 24 CONVERSION, AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION, AIDING 25 AND ABBETING FRAUD AND VIOLATION OF CAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Discovery in Cryptocurrency Transactions
    Knowledge Discovery in Cryptocurrency Transactions: A Survey Xiao Fan Liua,∗, Xin-Jian Jiangb, Si-Hao Liub, Chi Kong Tsec aDepartment of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China bSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China cDepartment of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China Abstract Cryptocurrencies gain trust in users by publicly disclosing the full creation and transaction history. In return, the transaction history faithfully records the whole spectrum of cryptocurrency user behaviors. This article analyzes and summarizes the existing research on knowledge discovery in the cryptocurrency transactions using data mining techniques. Specifically, we classify the exist- ing research into three aspects, i.e., transaction tracings and blockchain address linking, the analyses of collective user behaviors, and the study of individual user behaviors. For each aspect, we present the problems, summarize the methodolo- gies, and discuss major findings in the literature. Furthermore, an enumeration of transaction data parsing and visualization tools and services is also provided. Finally, we outline several future directions in this research area, such as the current rapid development of Decentralized Finance (De-Fi) and digital fiat money. Keywords: cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, Ethereum, transaction analysis, data mining, complex network Contents arXiv:2010.01031v1 [cs.CR] 2 Oct 2020 1 Introduction 2 2 Preliminaries 4 2.1 Thecryptocurrencyeconomy . 4 2.2 DataModels ............................. 5 3 Traceability and Linkability Issues 8 3.1 Tracingcryptocurrencytransactions . 8 ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Xiao Fan Liu) Preprint submitted to Elsevier October 5, 2020 3.2 Counter-tracingmeasures . 9 3.3 Taint analysis techniques .
    [Show full text]
  • Quoint Weekly Intelligence Bulletin 39
    Week 39 Weekly Intelligence Bulletin Date 28 September 2018 Reading Time 25-30 min Type Intelligence Bulletin Audience-Role Management Sub-Type Weekly Bulletin Audience-Industry Cross Industry R�������������� Period 20-09-2018 to 27-09-2018 TLP AMBER TLP: AMBER Intelligence Bullen TABLE OF CONTENTS CYBER 3 VULNERABILITIES .......................................... 3 Linux Kernel IP Fragment Reassembly Vulnerability impacting multiple Cisco Products . 3 New Exploit Variation of Recent VBScript Engine Vulnerability in theWild ............ 3 Zero Day Initiative Reports Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Jet Database Engine ...................................... 4 THREAT ACTOR ACTIVITY ...................................... 5 COBALT: Latest campaign activity spoofing Oracle ......................... 5 REPORTED INCIDENTS ........................................ 5 The United Nations Experiences Data Incidents on Third Party Platforms ............. 5 Energy Company RWE Suffers DDoS Attack ............................ 6 ROLLUP ............................................... 7 CRYPTOCURRENCY 8 Cryptocurrency Total Market Capitalization Declines ....................... 8 German Cryptoasset Exchanges Launches First Blockchain Bank Account ............ 8 French Government Reportedly Creating Legal Framework for Cryptoasset Providers . 9 ROLLUP ............................................... 9 GEOPOLITICS 11 Deutsche Telekom and German Armed Forces Cooperate on Cyber Defense . 11 U.N. General Assembly Annual Session .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Bitwise Asset Management, Inc., NYSE Arca, Inc., and Vedder Price P.C
    MEMORANDUM TO: File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-01 FROM: Lauren Yates Office of Market Supervision, Division of Trading and Markets DATE: March 20, 2019 SUBJECT: Meeting with Bitwise Asset Management, Inc., NYSE Arca, Inc., and Vedder Price P.C. __________________________________________________________________________ On March 19, 2019, Elizabeth Baird, Christian Sabella, Natasha Greiner, Michael Coe, Edward Cho, Neel Maitra, David Remus (by phone), and Lauren Yates from the Division of Trading and Markets; Charles Garrison, Johnathan Ingram, Cindy Oh, Andrew Schoeffler (by phone), Amy Starr (by phone), Sara Von Althann, and David Walz (by phone) from the Division of Corporation Finance; and David Lisitza (by phone) from the Office of General Counsel, met with the following individuals: Teddy Fusaro, Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. Matt Hougan, Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. Hope Jarkowski, NYSE Arca, Inc. Jamie Patturelli, NYSE Arca, Inc. David DeGregorio, NYSE Arca, Inc. (by phone) Tom Conner, Vedder Price P.C. John Sanders, Vedder Price P.C. The discussion concerned NYSE Arca, Inc.’s proposed rule change to list and trade, pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E, shares of the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust. Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. also provided the attached presentation to the Commission Staff. Bitwise Asset Management Presentation to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission March 19, 2019 About Bitwise 01 VENTURE INVESTORS Pioneer: Created the world’s first crypto index fund. 02 TEAM BACKGROUNDS Specialist: The only asset we invest in is crypto. 03 Experienced: Deep expertise in crypto, asset management and ETFs. 2 Today’s Speakers Teddy Fusaro Matt Hougan Chief Operating Officer Global Head of Research Previously Senior Vice President and Senior Previously CEO of Inside ETFs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptocurrency: a Primer for Policy-Makers
    August 2019 Cryptocurrency: A Primer for Policy-Makers Zack Gold and Megan McBride Approved for public release. Unlimited distribution. CRM-2019-U-020185-Final Abstract This primer is an effort to address a gap in knowledge about cryptocurrencies and the cryptocurrency ecosystem among the policymaking community and advance the understanding of cryptocurrencies and consideration of their national security implications. Cryptocurrencies are strictly digital currencies, are typically overseen by a decentralized peer-to-peer community, and are secured through cryptography. We use clear, non-technical language to describe complex concepts and demystify overly technical terms in order to explain the technical and economic aspects of cryptocurrency, why they are used, and the benefits and drawbacks to cryptocurrencies compared to conventional currencies—like the US dollar. We conclude by considering some cryptocurrency-related issues of which greater exploration would benefit US national security. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor or client. Distribution Approved for public release. Unlimited distribution. Cover image credit: “Photo of a mobile phone with a Bitcoin Cash wallet, Bitcoin whitepaper by Satoshi Nakamoto and Bitcoin.com pen.” BitcoinXio, Apr. 15, 2018. Approved by: August 2019 Jonathan Schroden, Research Program Director Special Operations Program Center for Stability & Development Strategy, Policy, Plans, and Programs Division (SP3) Request additional copies of this document through [email protected]. Copyright © 2019 CNA. All rights reserved Executive Summary In 2017, the value of one Bitcoin skyrocketed to more than $20,000. Media coverage increased, and even people who did not join the investment frenzy became aware of so-called “cryptocurrencies.” Despite this familiarity, few actually understand cryptocurrencies and the implications they may have on US interests, from global finance to national security to good governance.
    [Show full text]