2012 Annual Report Notice of 2013 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement Putting the Pieces Together the Lilly Promise Advancing Health

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2012 Annual Report Notice of 2013 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement Putting the Pieces Together the Lilly Promise Advancing Health PROGRESS AGAINST ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2012 ANNUAL REPORT NOTICE OF 2013 ANNUAL MEETING PROXY STATEMENT PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER THE LILLY PROMISE ADVANCING HEALTH. IMPROVING LIFE. In 2012, Eli Lilly and Company saw promising signs Our Mission For more than 136 years, Lilly has demonstrated its people suffering from deadly multidrug-resistant that we’re beginning to piece together the puzzle that is Lilly makes medicines that help people live longer, commitment to be a responsible global citizen. Today, tuberculosis. Alzheimer’s disease—a disease that has so far defied the healthier, more active lives. our understanding of corporate responsibility is evolv- • In 2011, we announced Lilly TruAssist, an easy-to- best efforts of medical science. While most of the public ing beyond philanthropy and reaching into the core of use, one-stop resource for the U.S.-based patient- attention was on Phase III trial results for solanezumab, our Our Values our business operations. assistance programs that we have long offered to monoclonal antibody being studied as a potential therapy Integrity | Excellence | Respect for People help people obtain the Lilly medications they need. for patients with Alzheimer’s disease, we continued to We promise to operate our business with absolute Increasingly, we’re bringing to the table our business • Through a partnership with Heifer International®, advance a multifaceted effort. (Please see pages 6–9.) integrity and earn the trust of all, set the highest assets and expertise, along with our financial resourc- our Elanco animal health business aims to bring standards for our performance and for the performance es, to address global health challenges. And we’re cre- 100,000 families worldwide out of hunger. At the same time, we also began to complete the puzzle of of our products, and demonstrate caring and respect ating shared value—for society and for Lilly—through how we navigate through the current “YZ” period of patent for all those who share in our mission and are touched efforts that include partnering with leading global Improving life. We’re committed to maintaining a sup- expirations and return to growth in the years that follow. In by our work. health organizations to find new solutions to the rising portive working environment, serving our local commu- the year after our Zyprexa® patent expired in most major burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). nities, and reducing our environmental footprint. markets, we met our financial performance goals, and Our Vision received encouraging data from late-stage clinical trials for We will make a significant contribution to humanity by All told, our corporate responsibility efforts can be We put special emphasis on flexibility in the workplace, potential medicines across our therapeutic areas. improving global health in the 21st century. Starting summed up in two goals: Advancing health. Improving life. and we were honored to have been named as Diversity- with the work of our scientists, we will place improved Inc’s Top Company for Working Families in 2012. We also Lilly’s progress against Alzheimer’s and other diseases outcomes for individual patients at the center of what Advancing health. Our vision as a company is to make a provide opportunities for our employees to share their reflects our resolute commitment to innovation, and we do. We will listen carefully to understand patient significant contribution to humanity by improving global expertise with communities around the world through exemplifies the work of Lilly scientists in neuroscience, needs and work with health care partners to provide health in the 21st century. We do this, first and fore- Connecting Hearts Abroad, a program that sends 200 cancer, diabetes, autoimmunity, and other therapeutic meaningful benefits for the people who depend on us. most, by creating innovative medicines that help people Lilly ambassadors each year on two-week community areas. That work goes on today, and there is much more live longer, healthier, more active lives. development assignments in Asia, Africa, and Central to do. But our scientific achievements and operating Our Strategy and South America. performance in 2012 strengthen our confidence that new We will create value for all our stakeholders by accel- We’re also spearheading broad, strategic partnerships and better medicines for patients around the world will erating the flow of innovative medicines that provide to improve access to health care and reduce hunger. Our commitment to corporate responsibility is reflected continue to flow from our laboratories. improved outcomes for individual patients. For example: in our ongoing support for the United Nations Global • The Lilly NCD Partnership, launched in 2011, will Compact’s 10 principles related to human rights, labor, provide $30 million over five years to fight NCDs in the environment, and anticorruption. developing nations, with an emphasis on diabetes. • The Lilly MDR-TB Partnership, launched in 2003, You can review our performance across all areas of our works to build health care provider capacity and business in our 2011/2012 Lilly Corporate Responsibility Year in Review Proxy Statement access to needed drugs in order to improve care for Update at www.lilly.com/responsibility/our-approach. 1 Financial Highlights 1 Notice of 2013 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement 2 Letter to Shareholders 2 Proxy Statement Overview 6 Progress Against Alzheimer’s Disease 4 Board of Directors 10 Pipeline of Molecules in Clinical Development 9 Director Compensation For more information on Lilly’s commitment to corporate responsibility 11 Highlights of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines www.lilly.com/responsibility Form 10-K 16 Committees of the Board of Directors 3 Business 16 Membership and Meetings of the Board and Its Committees For more information on Lilly’s commitment to transparency and links to 16 Risk Factors 17 Directors and Corporate Governance Committee Matters • Lilly Clinical Trial Registry 19 Properties 18 Audit Committee Matters • Lilly Grant Registry 20 Legal Proceedings 20 Compensation Committee Matters 23 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of 22 Compensation Discussion and Analysis • Lilly Physician Payment Registry Operations and Financial Condition 37 Executive Compensation • Lilly Political Contributions 40 Consolidated Statements of Operations 37 Summary Compensation Table www.lilly.com/about/business-practices/Pages/transparency.aspx 41 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 47 Ownership of Company Stock 42 Consolidated Balance Sheets 48 Items of Business To Be Acted Upon at the Meeting For more information on Lilly and pharmaceutical industry patient-assistance programs 43 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 52 Meeting and Voting Logistics Lilly TruAssist: 44 Segment Information 54 Other Matters www.lillytruassist.com 46 Selected Quarterly Data or call toll-free 1.855.LLY.TRUE (1.855.559.8783) 47 Selected Financial Data 55 Executive Committee and Senior Leadership 49 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 56 Corporate Information Partnership for Prescription Assistance (program sponsored by America’s pharmaceutical research companies): 82 Management’s Reports 57 Annual Meeting Admission Ticket www.pparx.org 84 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm For perspectives on health care innovation For more information on Lilly’s commitment to corporate LillyPAD, an official blog of Eli Lilly and Company: responsibility, please see the inside back cover of this report. lillypad.lilly.com © 2013 Eli Lilly and Company YEAR2012AR 2012 Financial Highlights ELI LILLY AND COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES (Dollars in millions, except per-share data) Year Ended December 31 2012 2011 Change % R evenue . $22,603.4 $24,286 .5 (7) Research and development . $5,278.1 $5,020 .8 5 Research and development as a percent of revenue . 23.4% 20 7%. Net income . $4,088.6 $4,347 7. (6) Earnings per share—diluted . 3.66 3 90 . (6) Reconciling items1: A cquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) . — 0 .23 A sset impairments, restructuring, and other special charges . 0.16 0 .29 Income from early payment of Amylin revenue-sharing obligation . (0.43) — Non-GAAP earnings per share—diluted . 3.39 4 .412 (23) Dividends paid per share . 1.96 1 9. 6 Capital expenditures . 905.4 672 .0 35 Employees . 38,350 38,080 1 1 For more information on these reconciling items, see the Financial Results section of the Executive Overview on page 24 of the Form 10-K . 2 Numbers in the 2011 column do not add due to rounding . Revenue Growth Across Business Areas Return on Assets and Shareholders’ Equity Total Shareholder Return ($ millions, percent growth) ROA and ROE declined in In 2012, the steady Revenue in Neuroscience 26.4% 51.0% 2012 as a result of the dividend stream and 24.9% decreased 22 percent Zyprexa patent loss, increase in the stock price 24.0% 46.1% due to the loss of patent offset in part by growth contributed to Lilly’s total protection for Zyprexa 16.3% in other products and shareholder return of 15.0% in most major markets, $6,810.9 0% cost-containment efforts. 24.0 percent, which once partially offset by a again compared 20 percent increase 31.4% favorably against the 3.7% $7,575.1 27.8% in Cymbalta. $3,281.6 S&P 500 benchmark. 2.1% Excluding Zyprexa, -22% -1% Neuroscience revenue 17.7% increased 15 percent. 15.8% 12.3% Animal Health grew 13.4% 21 percent driven by -6.1% strong growth in both food and companion $2,036.5 $266.8 $2,632.5 animal products. +21% -1% +6% -21.4% Return on Assets (ROA) Lilly Neuroscience -7.5% Endocrinology Return on Shareholders’ S&P 500 Oncology Equity (ROE) Cardiovascular -36.9% -16.3% Other Pharmaceutical Animal Health 08 09 10 11 12 08 09 10 11 12 To Our Shareholders In 2012, Eli Lilly and Company completed one of the understanding Alzheimer’s disease and develop- most challenging yet encouraging years in its 136-year ing potential treatments is just one of the fruits of ® history.
Recommended publications
  • The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Receptors As Novel Molecular Targets in Schizophrenia Treatment— a Narrative Review
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Receptors as Novel Molecular Targets in Schizophrenia Treatment— A Narrative Review Waldemar Kryszkowski 1 and Tomasz Boczek 2,* 1 General Psychiatric Ward, Babinski Memorial Hospital in Lodz, 91229 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular Neurochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92215 Lodz, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Schizophrenia is a severe neuropsychiatric disease with an unknown etiology. The research into the neurobiology of this disease led to several models aimed at explaining the link between perturbations in brain function and the manifestation of psychotic symptoms. The glutamatergic hypothesis postulates that disrupted glutamate neurotransmission may mediate cognitive and psychosocial impairments by affecting the connections between the cortex and the thalamus. In this regard, the greatest attention has been given to ionotropic NMDA receptor hypofunction. However, converging data indicates metabotropic glutamate receptors as crucial for cognitive and psychomotor function. The distribution of these receptors in the brain regions related to schizophrenia and their regulatory role in glutamate release make them promising molecular targets for novel antipsychotics. This article reviews the progress in the research on the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in schizophrenia etiopathology. Citation: Kryszkowski, W.; Boczek, T. The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Keywords: schizophrenia; metabotropic glutamate receptors; positive allosteric modulators; negative Receptors as Novel Molecular Targets allosteric modulators; drug development; animal models of schizophrenia; clinical trials in Schizophrenia Treatment—A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm10071475 1. Introduction Academic Editors: Andreas Reif, Schizophrenia is a common debilitating disease affecting about 0.3–1% of the human Blazej Misiak and Jerzy Samochowiec population worldwide [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of N-Acetylcysteine on Brain Glutamate Levels and Resting Perfusion in Schizophrenia
    Psychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-018-4997-2 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Effects of N-acetylcysteine on brain glutamate levels and resting perfusion in schizophrenia Grant McQueen1 & John Lally1,2 & Tracy Collier1 & Fernando Zelaya3 & David J. Lythgoe3 & Gareth J. Barker3 & James M. Stone1,4 & Philip McGuire1 & James H. MacCabe1 & Alice Egerton1 Received: 6 March 2018 /Accepted: 6 August 2018 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Rationale N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is currently under investigation as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia. The therapeutic potential of NAC may involve modulation of brain glutamate function, but its effects on brain glutamate levels in schizophrenia have not been evaluated. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine whether a single dose of NAC can alter brain glutamate levels. A secondary aim was to characterise its effects on regional brain perfusion. Methods In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study, 19 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia underwent two MRI scans, following oral administration of 2400 mg NAC or matching placebo. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy was used to investigate the effect of NAC on glutamate and Glx (glutamate plus glutamine) levels scaled to creatine (Cr) in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and in the right caudate nucleus. Pulsed continuous arterial spin labelling was used to assess the effects of NAC on resting cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the same regions. Results Relative to the placebo condition, the NAC condition was associated with lower levels of Glx/Cr, in the ACC (P <0.05), but not in the caudate nucleus. There were no significant differences in CBF in the NAC compared to placebo condition.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,114,138 B2 Cid-Nunez Et Al
    USOO9114138B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,114,138 B2 Cid-Nunez et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 25, 2015 (54) 1',3'-DISUBSTITUTED-4-PHENYL-3,4,5,6- (58) Field of Classification Search TETRAHYDRO-2H, 1'H-14' CPC .......................... A61K 31/4545; CO7D 401/04 BPYRIDINYL-2'-ONES USPC ........................................... 546/194; 514/318 (75) Inventors: Jose Maria Cid-Nunez, Toledo (ES); See application file for complete search history. Andres Avelino Trabanco-Suarez, (56) References Cited Toledo (ES); Gregor James MacDonald, Beerse (BE); Guillaume U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Albert Jacques Duvey, Geneva (CH): 4,051,244. A 9/1977 Mattioda et al. Robert Johannes Lutjens, Geneva 4,066,651 A 1/1978 Brittain et al. (CH); Terry Patrick Finn, Geneva (CH) (Continued) (73) Assignees: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Titusville, NJ (US); Addex Pharma SA, BE 841390 11, 1976 Geneva (CH) CA 1019323 1Of 1977 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (Continued) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 OTHER PUBLICATIONS U.S.C. 154(b) by 287 days. Adam, Octavian R. “Symptomatic Treatment of Huntington Dis (21) Appl. No.: 12/677,618 ease” Neurotherapeutics: The Journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics Apr. 2008, vol. 5, 181-197.* (22) PCT Filed: Sep. 12, 2008 Hook V. Y.H. “Neuroproteases in Peptide Neurotransmission and Neurodegenerative Diseases Applications to Drug Discovery (86). PCT No.: PCT/EP2008/007551 Research” Biodrugs 2006, 20, 105-119.* 371 1 Conn, P.J. “Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors as a novel S (c)(1), approach for the treatment of schizophrenia.” Trends in Pharmaco (2), (4) Date: Jun.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Schizophrenia Course Director: Philip Janicak, M.D
    S6735- Treatment of Schizophrenia Course Director: Philip Janicak, M.D. #APAAM2016 Saturday, May 14, 2016 Marriott Marquis - Marquis Ballroom D psychiatry.org/ annualmeetingS4637 ANNUAL MEETING May 14-18, 2016 • Atlanta Reference • Janicak PG, Marder SR, Tandon R, Goldman M (Eds.). Schizophrenia: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. Schizophrenia: Recent Diagnostic Advances, Neurobiology, and the Neuropharmacology of Antipsychotic Drug Therapy Rajiv Tandon, MD Professor of Psychiatry University of Florida College of Medicine Gainesville, Florida Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association New York, New York May 3–7, 2014 Disclosure Information MEMBER, WPA PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY SECTION MEMBER, DSM-5 WORKGROUP ON PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS A CLINICIAN AND CLINICAL RESEARCHER Pharmacological Treatment of Any Disease • Know the Disease that you are treating • Nature; Treatment targets; Treatment goals; • Know the Treatments at your disposal • What they do; How they compare; Costs; • Principles of Treatment • Measurement-based; Targeted; Individualized Program Outline • Nature and Definition of psychosis? • Clinical description • What is wrong in psychotic illness • Dimensions of Psychopathology • Neurobiological Abnormalities • Mechanisms underlying antipsychotic effects? • What contributes to Efficacy • Basis of Side-effect differences 5 Challenges in DSM-IV Construct of Psychotic Disorders ♦ Indistinct Boundaries ♦ With Other Disorders (eg., with OCD) ♦ Within Group of Psychotic Disorders (eg. between
    [Show full text]
  • Hippocampal Dysfunction in the Pathophysiology of Schizophrenia: a Selective Review and Hypothesis for Early Detection and Intervention
    OPEN Molecular Psychiatry (2018) 23, 1764–1772 www.nature.com/mp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hippocampal dysfunction in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia: a selective review and hypothesis for early detection and intervention JA Lieberman1,2, RR Girgis1,2, G Brucato1,2, H Moore1,2, F Provenzano3, L Kegeles1,2, D Javitt1,2, J Kantrowitz1,2, MM Wall1,2,4, CM Corcoran1, SA Schobel1 and SA Small1,3,5 Scientists have long sought to characterize the pathophysiologic basis of schizophrenia and develop biomarkers that could identify the illness. Extensive postmortem and in vivo neuroimaging research has described the early involvement of the hippocampus in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. In this context, we have developed a hypothesis that describes the evolution of schizophrenia—from the premorbid through the prodromal stages to syndromal psychosis—and posits dysregulation of glutamate neurotransmission beginning in the CA1 region of the hippocampus as inducing attenuated psychotic symptoms and initiating the transition to syndromal psychosis. As the illness progresses, this pathological process expands to other regions of the hippocampal circuit and projection fields in other anatomic areas including the frontal cortex, and induces an atrophic process in which hippocampal neuropil is reduced and interneurons are lost. This paper will describe the studies of our group and other investigators supporting this pathophysiological hypothesis, as well as its implications for early detection and therapeutic intervention. Molecular Psychiatry advance online publication, 9 January 2018; doi:10.1038/mp.2017.249 INTRODUCTION between dementia praecox and manic-depressive illness by Background and historical context painstaking description of symptoms and illness course. Since Scientists have been challenged to elucidate the pathological then, researchers have continued to search for the neuropatho- basis of mental illness.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Dependent Dopamine System Regulation Using Current and Novel Antipsychotic Drug Mechanisms: Developmental Implications in a Schizophrenia Model
    Title Page STATE-DEPENDENT DOPAMINE SYSTEM REGULATION USING CURRENT AND NOVEL ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG MECHANISMS: DEVELOPMENTAL IMPLICATIONS IN A SCHIZOPHRENIA MODEL by Susan Franklin Sonnenschein B.S., Psychology and Neuroscience, Michigan State University, 2014 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2020 Committee Page UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Susan Franklin Sonnenschein It was defended on December 19, 2019 and approved by Anissa Abi-Dargham, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Stony Brook University Beatriz Luna, PhD, Department of Psychiatry Robert Turner, PhD,, Department of Neurobiology David Volk, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry Dissertation Advisor: Anthony Grace, PhD, Department of Neuroscience Dissertation Chair: Susan Sesack, PhD, Department of Neuroscience ii Copyright © by Susan Franklin Sonnenschein 2020 iii STATE-DEPENDENT DOPAMINE SYSTEM REGULATION USING CURRENT AND NOVEL ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG MECHANISMS: DEVELOPMENTAL IMPLICATIONS IN A SCHIZOPHRENIA MODEL Susan Franklin Sonnenschein PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2020 Current antipsychotic drugs act on dopamine (DA) D2 receptors for their therapeutic effects, but their limitations have driven a search for novel treatments. Pharmaceutical research is generally performed in normal rats, whereas models that account for variables including disease- relevant pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Protective Effect of Pro-Cognitive Training During Adolescence on Neuronal Coordination Deficit in a Pharmacological Model of Schizophrenia
    Charles University Faculty of Science Study programme: Biology Branch of study: Animal physiology, Neurobiology Mgr. Branislav Krajčovič Protective effect of pro-cognitive training during adolescence on neuronal coordination deficit in a pharmacological model of schizophrenia Protektívny vplyv kognitívneho tréningu počas adolescencie na deficit neuronálnej koordinácie vo farmakologickom modeli schizofrénie Diploma thesis Supervisor: RNDr. Štěpán Kubík, PhD. Institute of Physiology AS CR Department of Neurophysiology of Memory Prague 2017 PREHLÁSENIE Prehlasujem, že som záverečnú prácu vypracoval samostatne na základe konzultácií so školiteľom a že som uviedol všetky použité informačné zdroje a literatúru. Táto práca ani jej podstatná časť nebola predložená k získaniu iného alebo rovnakého akademického titulu. V Prahe dňa 13.8.2017 Mgr. Branislav Krajčovič POĎAKOVANIE V prvom rade by som chcel poďakovať svojmu školiteľovi, RNDr. Štěpánovi Kubíkovi, PhD., za odborné vedenie, množstvo venovaného času stráveného praktickým príkladom aj diskusiami a prejavenú trpezlivosť, ktorú si veľmi vážim. Mgr. Hanke najprv Hatalovej, neskôr Brožke, za pomoc pri molekulárnych metódach, analýze dát a diskusie o filozofii aj pragmatike vedy. Mgr. Helene Buchtovej za uvedenie k práci so zvieratami a podpore pri mojich prvých samostatnejších krokoch v laboratóriu i zverinci. Michaele Fialovej za zručnú pomoc pri kriticky dôležitom kroku získavania mozgov. Mgr. et Mgr. Ivete Fajnerovej, PhD. za pomoc pri konfokálnej mikroskopii, a ľuďom z oddelenia 32 Fyziologického ústavu, vedeného prof. Alešom Stuchlíkom, za príjemné pracovné prostredie. Blízkym ďakujem za trpezlivosť pri počúvaní nevyžiadaných prednášok o schizofrénií, mapovaní neuronálnych populácií u potkanov, priebežných nárekov a ďalšom prednášaní. A hlavne ďakujem rodine za dlhoročnú podporu mojich záujmov počas štúdia sociálnej práce v Bratislave i biológie v Prahe, a neľahkom prechode medzi odbormi i mestami.
    [Show full text]
  • SEP-363856, a Novel Psychotropic Agent with a Unique, Non-D2 Receptor Mechanism of Action S
    Supplemental material to this article can be found at: http://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/suppl/2019/08/01/jpet.119.260281.DC1 1521-0103/371/1/1–14$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.119.260281 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS J Pharmacol Exp Ther 371:1–14, October 2019 Copyright ª 2019 by The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC Attribution 4.0 International license. SEP-363856, a Novel Psychotropic Agent with a Unique, Non-D2 Receptor Mechanism of Action s Nina Dedic,1 Philip G. Jones,1 Seth C. Hopkins, Robert Lew, Liming Shao, John E. Campbell, Kerry L. Spear, Thomas H. Large, Una C. Campbell, Taleen Hanania, Emer Leahy, and Kenneth S. Koblan Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, Marlborough, Massachusetts (N.D., P.G.J., S.C.H., R.L., L.S., J.E.C., K.L.S., T.H.L., U.C.C., K.S.K.); and PsychoGenics, Paramus, New Jersey (T.H., E.L.) Received May 24, 2019; accepted July 10, 2019 Downloaded from ABSTRACT For the past 50 years, the clinical efficacy of antipsychotic amine-associated receptor 1 and 5-HT1A receptors is integral to medications has relied on blockade of dopamine D2 receptors. its efficacy. Based on the preclinical data and its unique Drug development of non-D2 compounds, seeking to avoid mechanism of action, SEP-856 is a promising new agent for the limiting side effects of dopamine receptor blockade, has the treatment of schizophrenia and represents a new pharma- jpet.aspetjournals.org failed to date to yield new medicines for patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacological Treatment of Cognitive Deficits in Nondementing Mental Health Disorders Trevor W
    Original article Pharmacological treatment of cognitive deficits in nondementing mental health disorders Trevor W. Robbins, PhD Evidence for pharmacological remediation of cognitive deficits in three major psychiatric disorders—attention deficit- hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), schizophrenia, and depression—is reviewed. ADHD is effectively treated with the stimulant medications methylphenidate and d-amphetamine, as well as nonstimulants such as atomoxetine, implicating cognitive enhancing effects mediated by noradrenaline and dopamine. However, the precise mechanisms underlying these effects remains unclear. Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are less effectively treated, but attempts via a variety of neurotransmitter strategies are surveyed. The possibility of treating cognitive deficits in depression via antidepressant medication (eg, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and by adjunctive drug treatment has only recently received attention because of confounding, or possibly interactive, effects on mood. Prospects for future advances in this important area may need to take into account transdiagnostic perspectives on cognition (including neurodegenerative diseases) as well as improvements in neuropsychological, neurobiological, and clinical trial design approaches to cognitive enhancement. © 2019, AICH – Servier Group Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019;21(3):301-308. doi:10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/trobbins Keywords: cognition; memory; attention; ADHD; schizophrenia; depression; dopamine; noradrenaline; serotonin; glutamate; GABA Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • (NMDA) Receptor Glutamate Synapse
    Functional NMDA receptor-based target engagement biomarkers for schizophrenia research Daniel C. Javitt, M.D., Ph.D. Professor & Director, Division of Experimental Therapeutics Columbia University Medical Center Director of Schizophrenia Research Nathan Kline Institute Disclosures • Consultant: Pfizer, FORUM, Autifony, Glytech, Lundbeck, Concert, Cadence • Scientific Advisory Board: Promentis, NeuroRx, Phytecs • Equity: Glytech, AASI, NeuroRx • Intellectual property rights: Glycine, D-serine and glycine transport inhibitors in Sz; D-cycloserine, combined NMDAR/5-HT2AR antagonism in depression & PTSD; visual ERP for early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease • Off-label treatment: pomaglumetad Functional target engagement biomarkers The challenge • Glutamatergic theories of schizophrenia have become increasingly established over the past 25 years • Many glutamate-base pharmacological approaches show encouraging effects in preclinical models • To date, none has translated into an effective medication The solution • Need target engagement biomarkers to permit better translation from animals to humans • Allow “FAST fail” decisions regarding mechanism of action: • No target engagement - “fail” drug • Target engagement but no beneficial clinical effect – “fail” mechanism • Permit informed dose selection Academia, Government, and Pharma contributions Sci Transl Med. 3:102mr2, 2011 TRANSLATION TYPE (Institute of Medicine, 2013) NMDAR-based treatment development Background • NMDAR antagonists such as phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine induce symptoms,
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Characterization of Novel Allosteric Modulators Acting on Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors 2 and 3
    DEVELOPMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF NOVEL ALLOSTERIC MODULATORS ACTING ON METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS 2 AND 3 By Cody James Wenthur Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in PHARMACOLOGY August, 2015 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Professor Craig W. Lindsley Professor P. Jeffrey Conn Professor Randy D. Blakely Professor Aaron B. Bowman Professor Joey V. Barnett To my beloved wife, Brielle, the author of my happiness and To the untested truths, out beyond the ragged frontier ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The following work was generously supported by financial assistance from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute / Vanderbilt University Medical Center Certificate Program in Molecular Medicine, the NIGMS Vanderbilt Pre-Doctoral Pharmacology Training Program, NCATS funds awarded through the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, the NIH Clinical Research Loan Repayment Program, and the NIH Molecular Libraries Program. These visionary awards enable scientific studies at the boundaries between disciplines, emphasize the importance of applied science, and champion the development of the next generation of translational researchers. It is no overstatement to say that without such incredible backing, this manuscript would never have come to fruition. Likewise, the continuous guidance and assistance of my committee members was essential. The insights and suggestions of Drs. Randy Blakely, Aaron Bowman, and Joey Barnett, along with their unwavering commitment to helping me pursue my career and research goals, were integral to the success of the project. The current and former chairs of my committee, Drs. Jeff Conn and Scott Daniels, respectively, have both gone far beyond the simple requirements of their positions, providing me with access to their labs, equipment, and expertise – I will always be grateful for the opportunity to have learned from them.
    [Show full text]