DOCSLIB.ORG

Logical and Religious Studies Volume 46 Issue 2 August 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Logical and Religious Studies Volume 46 Issue 2 August 2021 An International Journal for Students of Theo- logical and Religious Studies Volume 46 Issue 2 August 2021 EDITORIAL: A Biblical Theology of Education 257 Exclusion from the People of God: An 336 by D. A. Carson Examination of Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in 1 Corinthians 5 by Jeremy Kimble STRANGE TIMES: No Longer Humans, but 269 Angels (and Demons) by Daniel Strange Diognetus and the Parting of the Ways 354 by Florenc Mene Testimonies of Faith and Fear: Canaanite 279 Responses to YHWH’s Work in Joshua Beginning at the End of All Things: Abraham 366 by Cory Barnes Kuyper’s and Klaas Schilder’s Eschatological Visions of Culture by Dennis Greeson The Bows of the Mighty Are Broken: The “Fall” 290 of the Proud and the Exaltation of the Humble Stories that Gleam like Lightning: The 375 in 1 Samuel by Justin Jackson Outrageous Idea of Christian Fiction by Hans Madueme and Robert Erle Barham A Two-Dimensional Taxonomy of Forms for 306 the NT Use of the OT by Douglas S. Huffman A Tale of Two Stories: Amos Yong’s Mission after 391 Pentecost and T’ien Ju-K’ang’s Peaks of Faith Jesus, “Adopted Son of God”? Romans 1:4, 319 by Robert P. Menzies Orthodox Christology, and Concerns about a Contemporary Conclusion by Joshua Maurer The Making of Biblical Womanhood: A Review 402 and Ty Kieser by Kevin DeYoung Book Reviews 413 DESCRIPTION Themelios is an international, evangelical, peer-reviewed theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. Its primary audience is theological students and pastors, though scholars read it as well. Themelios began in 1975 and was operated by RTSF/UCCF in the UK, and it became a digital journal operated by The Gospel Coalition in 2008. The editorial team draws participants from across the globe as editors, essayists, and reviewers. Themelios is published three times a year online at The Gospel Coalition website in PDF and HTML, and may be purchased in digital format with Logos Bible Software and in print with Wipf and Stock. Themelios is copyrighted by The Gospel Coalition. Readers are free to use it and circulate it in digital form without further permission, but they must acknowledge the source and may not change the content. EDITORS BOOK REVIEW EDITORS General Editor: Brian Tabb Old Testament: Peter Lau Systematic Theology: David Garner Bethlehem College & Seminary OMF International Westminster Theological Seminary 720 13th Avenue South 18-20 Oxford St 2960 Church Road Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA Epping, NSW 1710, Australia Glenside, PA 19038, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Contributing Editor: D. A. Carson New Testament: David Starling Ethics and Pastoralia: Rob Smith Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Morling College Sydney Missionary & Bible College 2065 Half Day Road 120 Herring Road 43 Badminton Road Deerfield, IL 60015, USA Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, Australia Croydon, NSW 2132, Australia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Contributing Editor: Daniel Strange History and Historical Theology: Mission and Culture: Oak Hill Theological College Geoff Chang Matthew Bennett Chase Side, Southgate Midwestern Baptist Theological Cedarville University London, N14 4PS, UK Seminary 251 N. Main St. [email protected] 5001 N Oak Trafficway Cedarville, OH 45314 USA Kansas City, MO 64118 [email protected] Administrator: Andy Naselli [email protected] Bethlehem College & Seminary 720 13th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD Gerald Bray, Beeson Divinity School; Hassell Bullock, Wheaton College; Benjamin Gladd, Reformed Theological Seminary; Paul Helseth, University of Northwestern, St. Paul; Paul House, Beeson Divinity School; Andreas Köstenberger, Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary; Hans Madueme, Covenant College; Ken Magnuson, The Evangelical Theological Society; Gavin Ortlund, First Baptist Church, Ojai; Ken Stewart, Covenant College; Mark D. Thompson, Moore Theological College; Paul Williamson, Moore Theological College; Mary Willson, Second Presbyterian Church; Stephen Witmer, Pepperell Christian Fellowship; Robert Yarbrough, Covenant Seminary. ARTICLES Themeliostypically publishes articles that are 4,000 to 9,000 words (including footnotes). Prospective contributors should submit articles by email to the managing editor in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or Rich Text Format (.rtf). Submissions should not include the author’s name or institutional affiliation for blind peer-review. Articles should use clear, concise English and should consistently adopt either UK or USA spelling and punctuation conventions. Special characters (such as Greek and Hebrew) require a Unicode font. Abbreviations and bibliographic references should conform to The SBL Handbook of Style (2nd ed.), supplemented by The Chicago Manual of Style (17th ed.). For examples of the the journal's style, consult the most recent issues and the contributor guidelines. REVIEWS The book review editors generally select individuals for book reviews, but potential reviewers may contact them about reviewing specific books. As part of arranging book reviews, the book review editors will supply book review guidelines to reviewers. Themelios 46.2 (2021): 257–68 EDITORIAL A Biblical Theology of Education — D. A. Carson — D. A. Carson is emeritus professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois, and cofounder and theologian-at-large of The Gospel Coalition. he topic at hand—a biblical theology of education—is like an oversized, under-inflated beach ball: you can’t miss it, and it’s easy to swat around, but it’s very difficult to control.1 Nevertheless, let me try to impose at least a little order on the topic. Begin with the Texpression “biblical theology.” Although there are many variations, today’s use of the expression commonly conjures up one of two ideas. First, whereas “systematic theology” tends to order its treatment of the theology of the Bible along logical and hierarchical lines (see, for example, a standard systematic theology like that of Bavinck or a more popular one like that of Grudem), biblical theology tends to order its treatment of the theology of the Bible along temporal lines, focusing on the contribution of each book and corpus along the path of the Bible’s storyline. The distinction between systematic theology and biblical theology is never absolute, of course, but it is strong enough to warrant recognition. Thus, a biblical theology of, say, the temple, traces out temple themes in the early chapters of Genesis, follows their trajectories all the way to the Apocalypse, and observes how these trajectories are not random but interrelated, constituting the warp and woof of interwoven themes, unfolding across time. Similarly, one can speak of the biblical theology of creation/new creation, of priesthood, of exile, and of much more. But in this sense of “biblical theology,” can one legitimately speak of a biblical theology of education? I don’t think so. It’s not as if there is a theological development of the theme of education from one end of the canon to the other. Of course, one could cheat a little and insist that all of God’s self- disclosure across human history constitutes an education of those humans. In that sense, education is biblical theology. But no one uses the term “education” today in precisely that way. Consider the definition of education advanced by Wikipedia (“Education is the process of facilitating learning, or the acquisition of knowledge, skills, values, morals, beliefs, and habits”). This static vision of education is not following the storyline of redemptive history. To put it another way, it is difficult to discern that the canon provides developing reflection on education. So, in this sense of “biblical theology” we may reasonably doubt that there is such a thing as a biblical theology of education. 1 This is a slightly revised version of a paper delivered at the International Alliance for Christian Educa- tion (IACE) annual conference on 3 February 2021 at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Fort Worth, Texas, and tweaked in light of questions and comments at the conference, and in light of suggestions made by the editor of Themelios. 257 Themelios A second common contemporary meaning of “biblical theology” is theology that is found in or based upon the Bible—a way of referring to systematic theology that is biblically faithful. On this view, our title makes education a subset, in effect, of systematic theology. This is conceptually less problematic. To talk of the biblical theology of education, in this sense of biblical theology, is akin to talking about the biblical theology of ecology or the biblical theology of angels. Ecology, angels, and, I would say, education, are not central biblical themes akin to Christology, atonement, and theology proper, but enough is said about each of them that if we assemble these bits carefully and inquire as to how they fit into the Bible as a whole, it is surprising how much can be learned. So, let us assemble some of the bits and pieces of what the Bible says about education. Then we shall briefly survey how those bits and pieces have worked themselves out in a handful of historical arrays, before we explore the peculiar challenges of putting these pieces together at the beginning of the twenty-first century, in the Western world. 1. Observations on Some Biblical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Second Trimester 2018
    Volume LXXXII, No. 2 • 2nd Trimester 2018 Contents Dream Forward 2 Dream Forward 3Better Together Scholarship Initiative 4King and Kingdon 9Equine Science Exceeds Goal for 13 Leadership Memphis-Area Students 16 Racial Injustice 18 David Potts n partnership with the Ethics as we pursue racial unity in the 22 Annual Meeting Schedule Iand Religious Liberty midst of tremendous tension.” 24 Union’s EDGE Program Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, IABCU insti- The Dream Forward Scholarship 28 Williams Baptist College tutions participated in the Initiative seeks to partner Christian colleges and seminar- 30 Legal Notes Dream Forward Scholarship Initiative. Dream Forward was ies to invest in the educational 33 Charleston Southern University created as part of the MLK50 future of minority students. The Conference, a joint venture of centerpiece of this effort is the Vol. LXXXII, No. 2 the ERLC and The Gospel creation of new pathways to a 2nd Trimester 2018 Coalition. quality higher education through an array of full and partial Publisher: Barbara McMillin, President and Board Chair, IABCU From the conference site, “Racial tuition scholarships at participat- Managing Editor Ashley Hill, unity is a gospel issue and all the ing Christian colleges and uni- Executive Secretary, IABCU more urgent 50 years after versities around the country The Baptist Educator (ISSN 0038-3848) is a reserved exclusively for minority news magazine published three times a year Martin Luther King Jr.’s for administrators, faculty, staff, trustees and death.The 50th anniversary of students in Memphis. The goal is friends of member schools by the King’s tragic death marks an to equip these students to return International Association of Baptist Colleges and Universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Talbot OT Department
    TOP PICKS OF OLD TESTAMENT RESOURCES By Owen Smiley Featuring the Recommendations of the Faculty of Talbot School of Theology, viz. Ken Way, Tom Finley, John Hutchison, and Ron Pierce Copyright ©2011 by Owen Smiley. All rights reserved. ii . To Molly & Ella iii Acknowledgments: This work would not have come to pass without the aid and grace of several people. Ken Way provided faculty supervision of the project, giving valuable insights, helpful feedback, encouragement, and lots of source suggestions. Other faculty of Talbot School of Theology, most notably John Hutchison and Tom Finley, answered the call to recommend sources. The Biola University Library circulation, Link+, and Interlibrary Loan departments helped track down innumerable sources. Deserved recognition also goes to my students in Biblical Studies Research Seminar, who took my requests for editing help seriously. Finally, the Talbot Associated Students printed the final copy for editing. Molly, my bride, displayed grace upon grace as at least six hundred volumes passed through our living room over ten months. I am indebted to her patience and support. Ella, my daughter, was born a little more than two months into this project, and is more beautiful than my work will ever be. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ........................................................................................................1 a. Surveying The Field: Tips on Evaluating OT Scholarship ..........................1 b. Notes on Using This Guide ..........................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 5404 SBJT V10N1.3.Indd
    Does the Doctrine of the Trinity Hold the Key to a Christian Theology of Religions? An Evaluation of Three Recent Proposals Keith E. Johnson Keith E. Johnson is a Ph.D. can- Introduction Similarly, didate in Christian theology at Duke A remarkable revival of Trinitarian the- University. Keith also serves as the I believe that the Trinitarian doc- ology emerged in the twentieth century. trine of God facilitates an authen- Director of Theological Education for Karl Rahner, on the Catholic side, and Karl tically Christian response to the world religions because it takes the the U.S. Campus Ministry of Campus Barth, on the Protestant side, played key particularities of history seriously Crusade for Christ where he oversees roles in the “ecumenical rediscovery” of as well as the universality of God’s 1 the theological training of two thousand the Trinity. In addition to rethinking ele- action. This is so because the doc- full-time campus ministers. His disserta- trine seeks to affirm that God has ments of this central doctrine (e.g., nature disclosed himself unreservedly and tion research draws together two of his of divine personhood, Filioque, etc.), this irreversibly in the contingencies and central interests (the doctrine of the resurgence of interest in the Trinity has particularity of the person Jesus. But Trinity and the contemporary challenge within Trinitarian thinking, we are provided the impetus for a fresh examina- also able to affirm, in the action of of religious pluralism) by examining the tion of other aspects of Christian theology the third person, that God is con- constitutive role of Trinitarian theology in and practice from a Trinitarian standpoint stantly revealing himself through the Christian theology of religions.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of First Samuel Chapter 1
    Book of First Samuel Chapter 1 First Samuel in the flow of Old Testament history: • Judges & Ruth – no king • 1 Samuel – man’s king (Saul) • 2 Samuel – God’s king (David) First Samuel is a book of transition: • From a time of judges to a time of kings • From a theocracy to a monarchy • Samuel was God’s bridge-builder . He was the last of the judges and the first of the prophets. He became the bridge to the kings of Israel by anointing the first two kings, Saul and David. Samuel gave spiritual leadership to the people at a critical time. The Bible describes those times in Judges 21:25 In those days there was no king in Israel: every man did that which was right in his own eyes. There was no king, but God raised up a prophet who called the nation back to God. Samuel was a man who stood in the gap. A. T. Pierson once said: “History is His story .” God is ultimately in control of history, but God uses people to change the course of history, and in this case He used Samuel. First Samuel traces the lives of three important leaders: • Samuel (chapters 1-7) • Saul (chapters 8-15) • David (chapters 16-31) 1. Hannah’s Problems (1:1-8) A. She had a domestic problem . She lived in a divided home because she had a rival woman to contend with. She had to share her husband with another woman. B. She had a physical problem . She was barren. Elkanah’s other wife had children, but she had none.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete List: 1-A
    Complete list: 1-a 1 & 2 Chronicles 1 & 2 Thessalonians 1–3 John Acts Louis C. Jonker David J. Williams Robert W. Yarbrough Mikeal C. Parsons Understanding THE BIBLE Understanding THE BIBLE BAKER EXEGETICAL Commentary PAIDEIA: Commentaries Commentary SERIES Commentary SERIES ON THE NEW Testament ON THE NEW Testament 978-0-8010-4825-8 • 352 pages 978-0-8010-4806-7 • 192 pages 978-0-8010-2687-4 • 464 pages 978-0-8010-3188-5 • 464 pages $23.00p* • Baker Books $17.00p* • Baker Books $42.99c • Baker Academic $30.00p* • Baker Academic ebook available ebook available ebook available ebook available UK rights: Paternoster UK rights: Paternoster 1, 2 & 3 John Acts 1 & 2 Kings 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus Thomas F. Johnson Jaroslav Pelikan Peter J. Leithart Gordon D. Fee Understanding THE BIBLE BRAZOS THEOLOGICAL BRAZOS THEOLOGICAL Understanding THE BIBLE Commentary SERIES Commentary ON THE BIBLE Commentary ON THE BIBLE Commentary SERIES 978-0-8010-4671-1 • 224 pages 978-1-58743-354-2 • 320 pages 978-1-58743-397-9 • 304 pages 978-0-8010-4623-0 • 350 pages $17.00p* • Baker Books $28.00p* • Brazos Press $28.00p* • Brazos Press $18.00p* • Baker Books ebook available ebook available ebook available ebook available UK rights: Paternoster EU rights: SCM-Canterbury Press EU rights: SCM-Canterbury Press UK rights: Paternoster 2 Corinthians Acts 1 & 2 Kings 1 Corinthians George H. Guthrie David J. Williams Iain W. Provan David E. Garland BAKER EXEGETICAL Commentary Understanding THE BIBLE Understanding THE BIBLE BAKER EXEGETICAL Commentary ON THE NEW Testament Commentary SERIES Commentary SERIES ON THE NEW Testament 978-0-8010-2673-7 • 736 pages 978-0-8010-4805-0 • 512 pages 978-0-8010-4748-0 • 320 pages 978-0-8010-2630-0 • 896 pages $49.99c • Baker Academic $22.00p* • Baker Books $18.00p* • Baker Books $54.99c • Baker Academic ebook available ebook available ebook available ebook available UK rights: Paternoster UK rights: Paternoster 2 Corinthians 1 Corinthians James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    JETS 63.2 (2020): 345–415 BOOK REVIEWS Basics of Hebrew Discourse: A Guide to Working with Hebrew Prose and Poetry. By Matthew H. Patton and Frederic Clarke Putnam. Edited by Miles V. Van Pelt. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2019, 288 pp., $29.99. Basics of Hebrew Discourse is authoreD by Matthew H. Patton (pastor of Cove- nant Presbyterian Church in Vandalia, OH) anD FreDeric Clarke Putnam (associate professor of Bible and liberal studies, The Templeton Honors College at Eastern University) and edited by Miles V. Van Pelt (Alan Belcher Professor of OT and Biblical Languages at Reformed Theological SeMinary). This is the newest aDdition to ZonDervan’s popular Basics of … language series anD maKes a significant contri- bution, not only to the series, but also to the fields of discourse analysis, Hebrew exegesis, and Hebrew language pedagogy. Written as a textbook for upper-level Hebrew students, the book is grounDbreaking in that it brings together these three fields in a way that is easy to understanD anD is useful for stuDents anD their teach- ers. The front matter for the book includes acknowledgments, a general introDuc- tion by Van Pelt, abbreviations, a table of graMMatical terMs, anD a bibliography. The authors then divide the book into two main sections, with Patton discussing Hebrew prose and Putnam covering Hebrew poetry. The Hebrew prose section begins with an introduction and a chapter that covers Discourse analysis in general. These are followed by chapters on discourse markers in Hebrew, verbal sequences in narrative and non-narrative, placing non-verbal elements before a verb, and verbless clauses.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley and the Future of Systematic Theology
    Being George Eliot: An Impossible Standpoint? Janice McRandal “Coakley is the George Eliot of Theologians.”1 This claim, made by Mark Oppenheimer, has sat uncomfortably in my memory for many years now, punctuated by a perpetual question mark. Oppenheimer was most likely referring to the way prose operated in Coakley’s work, but the ambiguity, or rather the irony, of this analogy has stuck. Eliot, of course, chose to conceal her gender. It was a means to an end, a way to penetrate the literary community of the Victorian era; a choice she felt would allow her work to be taken seriously and shield her from the puritanical gaze. It was a successful strategy for Mary Ann Evans: George Eliot’s legacy is secure alongside the great writers of Western literature. But this is hardly an uncomplicated ascription, perhaps demonstrated by the lasting confusion surrounding Virginia Woolf’s famous declaring of Eliot’s Middlemarch to be “one of the few English novels written for grown- up people.”2 In Coakley’s case, writing systematic theology as a woman 1. Mark Oppenheimer, “Prayerful Vulnerability,” Christian Century 120, no. 13 (2003): 26. 2. Virginia Woolf, “George Eliot,” The Times Literary Supplement, 20 November 1919. Regarding the vii COAKLEY AND THE FUTURE OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY has become an identity marker, a way in which her work is praised and critiqued. She has been celebrated for her “erudite, challenging and eirenic theological voice,”3 her work being described as a “connoisseur’s piece,”4 while simultaneously being critiqued for her academic Fachsprache,5 an ongoing issue of concern for feminists debating the use of exclusive language in the field.6 Much of this evaluation seems to depend on assumptions regarding what constitutes a serious systematician, or a solemn feminist.
    [Show full text]
  • POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L
    TMSJ 18/1 (Spring 2007) 3-21 THE NATURE OF TRUTH: POSTMODERN OR PROPOSITIONAL? Robert L. Thomas Professor of New Testament Ernest R. Sandeen laid a foundation for a contemporary concept of truth that was unique among evangelicals with a high view of Scripture. He proposed that the concept of inerrancy based on a literal method of interpretation was late in coming during the Christian era, having its beginning among the Princeton theologians of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He ruled out their doctrines related to inspiration because they were based on rational thinking which he taught was absent from earlier Christian thought. Subsequent evaluations of Sandeen’s work have disproved his assumption that those doctrines were absent from Christianity prior to the Princeton era. Yet well-known Christian writers have since built on Sandeen’s foundation that excludes rationality and precision from an interpretation of Scripture. The Sandeenists criticize the Princetonians for overreacting in their response to modernism, for their use of literal principles of interpretation, for defining propositional truth derived from the Bible, and for excluding the Holy Spirit’s help in interpretation. All such criticisms have proven to be without foundation. The Princetonians were not without fault, but their utilization of common sense in biblical interpretation was their strong virtue. Unfortunately, even the Journal of the inerrantist Evangelical Theological Society has promoted some of the same errors as Sandeen. The divine element in inspiration is a guarantee of the rationality and precision of Scripture, because God, the ultimate author of Scripture, is quite rational and precise, as proven by Scripture itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah Coakley
    god, sexuality, and the self God, Sexuality, and the Self is a new venture in systematic theology. Sarah Coakley invites the reader to reconceive the relation of sexual desire and the desire for God, and – through the lens of prayer practice – to chart the intrinsic connection of this relation to a theology of the Trinity. The goal is to integrate the demanding ascetical undertaking of prayer with the recovery of lost and neglected materials from the tradition, and thus to reanimate doctrinal reflection both imaginatively and spiritually. What emerges is a vision of human longing for the triune God which is both edgy and compelling: Coakley’s théologie totale questions standard shib- boleths on ‘sexuality’ and ‘gender’, and thereby suggests a way beyond current destructive impasses in the churches. The book is clearly and accessibly written, and will be of great interest to all scholars and students of theology. sarah coakley is Norris–Hulse Professor of Divinity at the University of Cambridge. Her publications include Religion and the Body (Cambridge, 2000), Powers and Submissions: Philosophy, Spirituality and Gender (2002), Pain and its Transformations (2008), The Spiritual Senses (with Paul L. Gavrilyuk; Cambridge, 2011), and Sacrifice Regained (Cambridge, 2012). Coakley is also the editor of Re-Thinking Gregory of Nyssa (2003) and co-editor (with Charles M. Stang) of Re-Thinking Dionysius the Areopagite (2009). University Printing House, Cambridge CB28BS, United Kingdom Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York Cambridge University Press is part of the University of Cambridge. It furthers the University’s mission by disseminating knowledge in the pursuit of education, learning, and research at the highest international levels of excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Biblical Womanhood
    Contents Acknowledgments viii Introduction 1 1. The Beginning of Patriarchy 11 2. What If Biblical Womanhood Doesn’t Come from Paul? 39 3. Our Selective Medieval Memory 71 4. The Cost of the Reformation for Evangelical Women 101 5. Writing Women Out of the English Bible 129 6. Sanctifying Subordination 151 7. Making Biblical Womanhood Gospel Truth 173 8. Isn’t It Time to Set Women Free? 201 Notes 219 Author Bio 245 vii _Barr_BiblicalWomanhood_MB_jck.indd 7 12/18/20 11:53 AM TWO What from Doesn’t Come Paul? Womanhood If Biblical “I HATE PAUL!” I can’t tell you how many times I have heard that from my students, mostly young women scarred by how Paul has been used against them as they have been told to be silent (1 Corinthians 14), to submit to their husbands (Ephesians 5), not to teach or exercise authority over men (1 Timothy 2), and to be workers at home (Titus 2). They have been taught that God designed women to follow male headship (1 Corinthians 11), focusing on family and home (Colossians 3; 1 Peter 3), and that occupations other than family should be secondary for women, mostly undertaken out of necessity or after their children have left the house. A few years ago, a student came to my office ostensibly to discuss her class paper, but it soon became clear that what she really wanted to discuss was her vocation. She asked me: Did God call you to be a professor as well as a mom and a pastor’s wife? Was it hard? Did you feel guilty about working outside the home? Was your husband sup- portive? What did people in your church think? She shared her frustrations as a career-minded Christian woman from a conservative background who was trying to reconcile church and family expectations with her vocational calling.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY and the LIBERATION of EVE a Thesis
    CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY AND THE LIBERATION OF EVE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Jennifer Emily Sims, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. April 1, 2016 CHRISTIAN PATRIARCHY AND THE LIBERATION OF EVE Jennifer Emily Sims, B.A. MALS Mentor: Theresa Sanders, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Christian Patriarchy is a set of beliefs held by many conservative Christians that outlines gender roles based on a literal interpretation of scripture. These gender roles, also referred to as biblical manhood and biblical womanhood, dictate the hierarchy of authority where Christ is the head of the household, the husband is the head of the wife. Children are primed at a very young age to demonstrate the tenets of biblical manhood and biblical womanhood, but for young girls, their paths are strictly laid out for them to marry, birth many Godly children, and serve their husbands. The fundamentalist reading of Genesis 2-3 is used to justify female submission via Eve’s creation and subsequent role in the Fall of Humanity. This evangelical interpretation uses Genesis 2-3 as the foundational text to first justify women as subordinate based on creation order, and secondly justify women’s submission on Eve’s role in the Fall of Humanity. By using biblical interpretations to subordinate the woman’s position vis-à-vis her husband, women in these conservative Christian homes are locked into this role with little chance to follow a different path, and are often dependent on a dominant male figure for survival.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection Or Miraculous Cures? the Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against Its Ancient Near Eastern Background
    Bar, “Resurrection or Miraculous Cures?” OTE 24/1 (2011): 9-18 9 Resurrection or Miraculous Cures? The Elijah and Elisha Narrative Against its Ancient Near Eastern Background SHAUL BAR (UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS) ABSTRACT The Elijah and Elisha cycles have similar stories where the prophet brings a dead child back to life. In addition, in the Elisha story, a corpse is thrown into the prophet’s grave; when it comes into con- tact with one of his bones, the man returns to life. Thus the question is do these stories allude to resurrection, or “only” miraculous cures? What was the purpose of the inclusion of these stories and what message did they convey? In this paper we will show that these are legends that were intended to lend greater credence to prophetic activity and to indicate the Lord’s power over death. A INTRODUCTION There is consensus among scholars that Dan 12:2-3, which they assign to the 1 second century B.C.E., refers to the resurrection of the dead. The question be- comes whether biblical texts earlier than this era allude to this doctrine. The phrase “resurrection of the dead” never appears in the Bible. Scholars searching for biblical allusions to resurrection have cited various idioms.2 They list verbs including “arise,”3 “wake up,”4 and “live,”5 all of which can denote a return to life. We also find “take,”6 which refers to being taken to Heaven, the noun “life,”7 and “see.”8 In the present paper however, we shall examine the stories of the Elijah and Elisha cycles which include similar tales in which the prophet brings a dead child back to life: in Elijah’s case, the son of the widow of Zare- phath (1 Kgs 17:17-24); in Elisha’s, the son of the Shunammite matron (2 Kgs 4:31-37).
    [Show full text]