DOCSLIB.ORG

T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 Spare Parts Exclusive Distributor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 Spare Parts Exclusive Distributor Reference Gu id e A UXILIARY AND GROUND P OW ER S YSTEM S Power Systems 11-2013 T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 spare parts exclusive Distributor www.gelbyson.com - E-mail: [email protected] Tel. (+39) 06.363.04.761 - (+39) 06.363.04.941 Fax (+39) 06.32.97.337 T-62T-46LC-1 TJ-50 APS 1000 APS 2100 APS 500 T-62T-46-2 APS 500R T-62T-40-8 Jet Fuel Starter APS 3200 11-2013 T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 spare parts exclusive Distributor www.gelbyson.com - E-mail: [email protected] Tel. (+39) 06.363.04.761 - (+39) 06.363.04.941 Fax (+39) 06.32.97.337 C OM M ERCIAL A PPLICATIONS MODEL NAME/NUMBER MAXI MUM BLEED AI R/ SIZE (IN) DRY WEI GHT (LBS.) APPLI CATI ON SUMMARY SHAFT OUTPUT (PPM/HP) LXWXH Gemini/T-62T-20G10C3/4 0/28 24.4x13x13.7 70 Learjet 55B/60, Raytheon King Air APS 500/ T-62T-39 37/40 29.8x20.9x21.2 94 Falcon 20, Jetstar, HS-125, Sabreliner 60 APS 500/T-62T-40C2 76/80 30.1x15.6x21.9 96 Gulfstream GII, Jetstar APS 500/T-62T-40C3 76/80 26.5x16x17.5 87 Falcon 200 Busi ness Jet s APS 500/ T-62T-40C3A/ A1 76/ 60 24.4x13x13.7 87 Falcon 50, Cessna Citation VI, VII APS 500/T-62T-40C7A 76/50 31.6x16.2x20.1 96 Cessna Citation III APS 500/T-62T-40C7B/D 72/50 31.8x10x23.5 105 deHavilland Dash 8-100/200/300 Series APS 500/T-62T-40C7E1 45/95 29x19x18.9 116 EMBRAER 120 APS 500/T-62T-40C7E2 70/90 29x19x18.9 111 Falcon 20 APS 500/T-62T-40C8D/D1 36/40 31.4x18.5x18 96 Raytheon Hawker 125-800/ 1000 APS 500/T-62T-40C9 44/40 26x19x18 102 Business Jet Applications APS 500/T-62T-40C11 61/25 27x22x21 115 EMBRAER ERJ 135/140/145 APS 500R/T-62T-40C14 77/25 27x22x21 120 EMBRAER ERJ 135/140/145 APS 1000/T-62T-46C1 97/150 33.6x20.5x20.6 175 Fokker 50 APS 1000/T-62T-46C3 97/100 36.4x27x22.3 190 BAE RJ/146, AVRO RJ Re g i o n aAPS l Je t s 1000/T-62T-46C3A 97/100 36.4x27x22.3 190 BAE AVRO RJX APS 1000/T-62T-46C7 83/90 39.2x23x26 160 Saab 2000 APS 1000/T-62T-46C12 84/25 30x24.5x22 135 deHavilland Dash 8 Q400 APS 2000/T-62T-47C1 175/95 42.1x20.9x21.9 282 Boeing 737 APS 2100 175/95 46.4x27x25.6 410 Boeing 717 APS 2300 127/62 36x20x22 260 EMBRAER ERJ 170/190 APS 3200 200/170 26.9x15.4x18.4 308 A318/319/320/321 Lar ge Transpor t s M ILITARY A PPLICATIONS MODEL NAME/NUMBER MAXI MUM BLEED AI R/ SIZE (IN) DRY WEI GHT (LBS.) APPLI CATI ON SUMMARY SHAFT OUTPUT (PPM/HP) LXWXH T- 2 0 G - 1 0 - C 4 P 0/28 12.9x12.5x9.8 28 * Rheinmetall Landsysteme for Hyundai K-1 ARV T- 6 2 T- 2 A 1 0/95 31.4x18.5x18 71 CH-47A-C T- 6 2 T- 2 B 0/95 32.7x13.8x21.1 75 CH-47D T- 6 2 T- 1 1 0/75 26.8x14x19.4 70 CH-46 T- 6 2 T- 1 6 B/ B1 0/75 26.9x15.4x18.4 75 H-3/VH-3D T- 6 2 T- 2 7 0/140 27x17.2x22.5 84 CH-53E T- 6 2 T- 4 0 - 1 56/56 29.3x16x17.1 87 BlackHawk, Seahawk, Night Hawk, Super Seasprite, AH-1Z, UH-1Y, VH-60, VH-3D T- 6 2 T- 4 0 - 8 0/230 17.3x10x12.4 43* Jet Fuel Starter for F-16 Fighter Aircraft T- 6 2 T- 4 0 - C 7 EH 56/56 27x15.9x18.7 89 EH 101 T- 6 2 T- 4 0 LC - 2 138/40 38.6x21.3x26.7 187 KC-135R T- 6 2 T- 4 6 - 2 0/300 31.4x17.9x16.9 149 V-22 Osprey Tiltrotor T- 6 2 T- 4 6 - C 1 6 75/90 29x16.4x16 132 Lockheed Martin/ Alenia C27J T- 6 2 T- 4 6 LC - 1 152/0 39.5x13.5x18.4 174 JAS-39 Gripen T- 6 2 T- 4 6 LC - 2 152/0 39.5x13.5x18.4 156 T/A-50 (KTX-2) T- 6 2 T- 4 6 C 1 4 70/116 41x24x22.6 182 EMBRAER EMB-145 SIVAM/AEW&C TJ- 3 0 30 (Thrust - Lbf.) 9x4.5x4.5 6 Lockheed Martin LOCAAS, Raytheon Netfires LAM TJ- 5 0 50 (Thrust - Lbf.) 12x5.4x6.9 12 MALD APS 3400 200/170 26.9x15.4x18.4 314 Lockheed Martin C-5 GROUND AND M ARINE P OW ER MODEL NAME/NUMBER MAXI MUM BLEED AI R/ SIZE (IN) DRY WEI GHT (LBS.) APPLI CATI ON SUMMARY SHAFT OUTPUT (PPM/HP) LXWXH T- 6 2 T- 1 1 A 0/47 26.2x15.6x15.9 95 PPU for CF-LLADS (Canadian Forces Low Level Air Defense System) T- 6 2 T- 4 0 - 1 72/90 29.3x16x17.1 87 VHU Startcart T- 6 2 T- 4 7 C 3 P 204/0 22.7x18x18 125 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Air Start Unit T- 6 2 T- 4 3 0/130 46.9x18x32 340 90 kW Generator Set for Mitsui PGX Hydrofoil T- 6 2 T- 4 0 - 7 4 0 / 1 5 0 3 8 . 2 x21.5x21.5 164 LCAC (Landing Aircraft Cushion) Vehicle *Powerhead only 11-2013 T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 spare parts exclusive Distributor www.gelbyson.com - E-mail: [email protected] Tel. (+39) 06.363.04.761 - (+39) 06.363.04.941 Fax (+39) 06.32.97.337 Hamilton Sundstrand — Power Systems Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, headquartered in Windsor Locks, Connecticut, USA, is a subsidiary of United Technologies Corporation and was formed as a result of the 1999 merger of Hamilton Standard and Sundstrand Corporation. Hamilton Sundstrand operations, located around the world, produce high-technology aerospace and industrial products for a variety of markets. Hamilton Sundstrand — Power Syst ems, Sa n D i eg o , C a l i f o r n i a , U SA, part of the Air Management and Power Systems business unit of Hamilton Sundstrand, designs, manufactures and supports auxiliary power unit systems, high- performance fans, and other environmental control system products. Power Systems houses over 650 employees in a modern 225,000 square-foot facility in San Diego. Hamilton Sundstrand — Power Systems provides a wide range of APUs for com- mercial aircraft from business to regional jets up to 200-passenger airliners. Over 3,360 units are in commercial service with more than 26,000,000 hours of operation Hamilton Sundstrand - Power Systems, San Diego, California experience. Hamilton Sundstrand — Power Systems is also the world’s largest supplier of gas turbine APUs for military applications, with such high-volume programs as the Sikorsky H-60 series helicopter (3,000 units), the F-16 (4,000 units), and the KC-135R (900 units). Approximately half of the installed base of the western world’s military aircraft that have APUs or jet fuel starters were equipped by Hamilton Sundstrand. Units are available for ground operation, flight-essential and flight-critical applications. In addition to being the principal supplier of gas turbine auxiliary power units, Hamilton Sundstrand is now the leader in the development of miniature (less than 100 lbf thrust) jet engines. Auxiliary power units are available to both aircraft manufacturers and support equipment packagers. Mobile ground power systems and air start units are available through Rheinmetall Landsystem of Kiel Germany. Power Systems 4400 Ruffin Road I P.O. Box 85757 I San Diego, California 92186-5757 Phone: (858) 627-6000 I FAX: (858) 627-6601 Email: [email protected] www.hs-powersystems.com HSPS2322190600 11-2013 T-62T-2A1 & T-62T-16B/B1 spare parts exclusive Distributor www.gelbyson.com - E-mail: [email protected] Tel. (+39) 06.363.04.761 - (+39) 06.363.04.941 Fax (+39) 06.32.97.337.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nord-Micro's TTP-Based Cabin Pressure Control System
    Advanced Control Systems for Airbus A380 Nord-Micro’s TTP-Based Cabin Pressure Control System More about this success story online www.tttech.com/aerospace We have decided for TTTech because our systems are critical for passenger safety and cabin comfort. Their time-triggered protocol TTP and products provide us with “ the safest and most advanced platform for cabin pressure control systems available on the market. Friedrich Scheerer Manager Cabin Pressure Control System Development Nord-Micro ” The Airbus A380 is the most advanced, spacious and efficient commercial airliner ever conceived. Designed in close collaboration with major airlines, airport operators and airworthiness authorities, the A380 brings new standards of cabin comfort and better economics in more environmentally responsible aircraft. Whilst doing all of this, it allows growth and reduced congestion from today’s airports with minimum change. Most importantly, the A380’s modern technology and economies of scale offer passengers a whole new way of flying and more affordable prices. The A380 flies for up to 14 hours at an altitude of 11,000 meters with an ambient temperature of -56°C and a pressure of less than 20 per cent of the usual ambient pressure. No human being could survive air travel in such a hostile environment. In order to ensure that passengers and attendants enjoy their flight under the same conditions as in daily life, a cabin pressure control system is required. Airbus selected Nord-Micro (Business unit of UTC Aerospace Systems), Frankfurt/Germany, to supply its highly reliable cabin pressure control system to the new flagship of their fleet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential of Turboprops to Reduce Fuel Consumption in the Chinese Aviation System
    THE POTENTIAL OF TURBOPROPS TO REDUCE FUEL CONSUMPTION IN THE CHINESE AVIATION SYSTEM Megan S. Ryerson, Xin Ge Department of City and Regional Planning Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering University of Pennsylvania [email protected] ICRAT 2014 Agenda • Introduction • Data collection • Turboprops in the current CAS network • Spatial trends for short-haul aviation • Regional jet and turboprop trade space • Turboprops in the future CAS network 2 1. Introduction – Growth of the Chinese Aviation System Number of Airports • The Chinese aviation system is in a period 300 of rapid growth • China’s civil aviation system grew at a rate 250 244 of 17.6%/year, 1980 - 2009 • Number of airports grew from 77 to 166 and annual traffic volume increasing from 3.43 million to 230 million 200 • The Civil Aviation Administration of China 166 (CAAC) maintains a target of 244 airports 150 across the country by 2020 • The CAAC plans for 80% of urban and suburban areas to be within a 100km (62 100 77 miles) of aviation service by 2020 • Plans also include strengthening hub-and- 50 spoke networks across the country to meet the dual goals of improving the competitiveness and efficiency of domestic 0 and international aviation. 1980 2009 2020 (Planned) 3 1. Introduction – Reform of the Chinese Aviation System • Consolidation Strong national hubs + insufficient regional coverage • Regional commuter airlines could fill this gap by partnering with China’s major carriers and serving the second-tier and emerging hubs (Shaw, 2009) 4 1. Introduction – Aircraft of the Short Haul Chinese Aviation System Narrow Body Jet Fuel per seat: 7.9 gal Regional Jet Fuel per seat: 19.0 gal Turboprop Fuel per seat: 4.35 gal 5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Fuel Efficiency Characteristics of Regional Aircraft from Technological, Operational, and Cost Perspectives
    The Historical Fuel Efficiency Characteristics of Regional Aircraft from Technological, Operational, and Cost Perspectives Raffi Babikian, Stephen P. Lukachko and Ian A. Waitz* Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139 ABSTRACT To develop approaches that effectively reduce aircraft emissions, it is necessary to understand the mechanisms that have enabled historical improvements in aircraft efficiency. This paper focuses on the impact of regional aircraft on the U.S. aviation system and examines the technological, operational and cost characteristics of turboprop and regional jet aircraft. Regional aircraft are 40% to 60% less fuel efficient than their larger narrow- and wide-body counterparts, while regional jets are 10% to 60% less fuel efficient than turboprops. Fuel efficiency differences can be explained largely by differences in aircraft operations, not technology. Direct operating costs per revenue passenger kilometer are 2.5 to 6 times higher for regional aircraft because they operate at lower load factors and perform fewer miles over which to spread fixed costs. Further, despite incurring higher fuel costs, regional jets are shown to have operating costs similar to turboprops when flown over comparable stage lengths. Keywords: Regional aircraft, environment, regional jet, turboprop 1. INTRODUCTION The rapid growth of worldwide air travel has prompted concern about the influence of aviation activities on the environment. Demand for air travel has grown at an average rate of 9.0% per year since 1960 and at approximately 4.5% per year over the last decade (IPCC, 1999; FAA, 2000a). Barring any serious economic downturn or significant policy changes, various * Contact author: 617-253-0218 (phone), 617-258-6093 (fax), [email protected] (email) 1 organizations have estimated future worldwide growth will average 5% annually through at least 2015 (IPCC, 1999; Boeing, 2000; Airbus, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Afterburners
    2. AFTERBURNERS 2.1 Introduction The simple gas turbine cycle can be designed to have good performance characteristics at a particular operating or design point. However, a particu­ lar engine does not have the capability of producing a good performance for large ranges of thrust, an inflexibility that can lead to problems when the flight program for a particular vehicle is considered. For example, many airplanes require a larger thrust during takeoff and acceleration than they do at a cruise condition. Thus, if the engine is sized for takeoff and has its design point at this condition, the engine will be too large at cruise. The vehicle performance will be penalized at cruise for the poor off-design point operation of the engine components and for the larger weight of the engine. Similar problems arise when supersonic cruise vehicles are considered. The afterburning gas turbine cycle was an early attempt to avoid some of these problems. Afterburners or augmentation devices were first added to aircraft gas turbine engines to increase their thrust during takeoff or brief periods of acceleration and supersonic flight. The devices make use of the fact that, in a gas turbine engine, the maximum gas temperature at the turbine inlet is limited by structural considerations to values less than half the adiabatic flame temperature at the stoichiometric fuel-air ratio. As a result, the gas leaving the turbine contains most of its original concentration of oxygen. This oxygen can be burned with additional fuel in a secondary combustion chamber located downstream of the turbine where temperature constraints are relaxed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power for Flight: NASA's Contributions To
    The Power Power The forFlight NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion for for Flight Jeremy R. Kinney ThePower for NASA’s Contributions to Aircraft Propulsion Flight Jeremy R. Kinney Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Kinney, Jeremy R., author. Title: The power for flight : NASA’s contributions to aircraft propulsion / Jeremy R. Kinney. Description: Washington, DC : National Aeronautics and Space Administration, [2017] | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2017027182 (print) | LCCN 2017028761 (ebook) | ISBN 9781626830387 (Epub) | ISBN 9781626830370 (hardcover) ) | ISBN 9781626830394 (softcover) Subjects: LCSH: United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration– Research–History. | Airplanes–Jet propulsion–Research–United States– History. | Airplanes–Motors–Research–United States–History. Classification: LCC TL521.312 (ebook) | LCC TL521.312 .K47 2017 (print) | DDC 629.134/35072073–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017027182 Copyright © 2017 by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The opinions expressed in this volume are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the United States Government or of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Table of Contents Dedication v Acknowledgments vi Foreword vii Chapter 1: The NACA and Aircraft Propulsion, 1915–1958.................................1 Chapter 2: NASA Gets to Work, 1958–1975 ..................................................... 49 Chapter 3: The Shift Toward Commercial Aviation, 1966–1975 ...................... 73 Chapter 4: The Quest for Propulsive Efficiency, 1976–1989 ......................... 103 Chapter 5: Propulsion Control Enters the Computer Era, 1976–1998 ........... 139 Chapter 6: Transiting to a New Century, 1990–2008 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reusable Ram Booster Launch Design Emphasizes Use of Existing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration technology opportunity Reusable Ram Booster Launch Design Emphasizes Use of Existing Components to Achieve Space Transport for Satellites and Spacecraft Using off-the-shelf technology to make space transport more affordable Engineers at NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center have designed a partially reusable launch Benefits system to propel a payload-bearing spacecraft t Economical: Lowers the cost of space access, into a low Earth orbit (LEO). The concept design with use of reusable components and a simplified propulsion system for the three-stage Ram Booster employs existing turbofan engines, ramjet propulsion, and an already t Efficient: Maximizes use of already operational components by using off-the-shelf technology operational third-stage rocket to achieve LEO t Effective: Enables fast turnaround between missions, for satellites and other spacecraft. Excluding with reuse of recoverable first and second stages payload (which stays in orbit), over 97 percent t Safer: Operates with jet fuel in lower stages, of the Ram Booster’s total dry weight (including eliminating the need for hazardous hypergolic or cryogenic propellants and complex reaction three stages) is reusable. As the design also control systems draws upon off-the-shelf technology for many t Simpler: Offers a single fuel type for air-breathing of its components, this novel approach to space turbofan and ramjet engines transport dramatically lowers the cost of access to t Novel: Approaches space launch complexities space. The technology has applications for NASA, in a new way, providing a conceptual technical breakthrough for first and second stage boost the military, and the commercial aerospace sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Jet Fuel: from Well to Wing
    Jet Fuel: From Well to Wing JANUARY 2018 Abstract Airlines for America (A4A) is the nation’s oldest and largest U.S. airline industry trade association. Its members1 and their affiliates account for more than 70 percent of the passenger and cargo traffic carried by U.S. airlines. According to the Energy Information Administration, U.S.-based jet fuel demand averaged 1.6 million barrels per day in 2016. Generally, fuel is supplied to airports through a combination of interstate multiproduct pipelines, third-party and off-airport terminals, and dedicated local pipelines. The last few years have continued to demonstrate the fragility of this complex system and the threat it poses to air-service continuity. The current interstate refined products pipeline system, constructed many decades ago, is both capacity-constrained and vulnerable to disruptions that typically require a patchwork of costly, inadequate fixes. New shippers have difficulty obtaining line space and long-established shippers have difficulty shipping all of their requirements. It is likely that demand will continue to outpace the capacity of our outdated distribution system for liquid fuels. Given the increasing demand to transport liquid fuels, it is imperative that we take steps to overcome existing bottlenecks and prevent future ones. These fuels are essential to aviation, trucking and rail, among others, which help power our twenty- first century economy. As shippers and consumers of significant quantities of refined products on pipelines throughout the country, airlines and other users of liquid fuels have a substantial interest in addressing the nationwide deficiency in pipeline investment. Surely, expedited permitting for fuel distribution-related infrastructure projects could help pave the way to upgrade existing pipeline assets and expand throughput capacity into key markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulating the Use of Alternative Fuels in a Turbofan Engine
    NASA/TM—2013-216547 Simulating the Use of Alternative Fuels in a Turbofan Engine Jonathan S. Litt and Jeffrey C. Chin Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio Yuan Liu N&R Engineering, Inc., Parma Heights, Ohio September 2013 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientifi c and technical NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientifi c and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major signifi cant phase For more information about the NASA STI of research that present the results of NASA program, see the following: programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Combustion and Fuels Research Talks
    .. COMBUSTION AND FUELS RESEARCH Part I - High-Output Turbojet Combustors • 'A by Wilfred E. Scull and Richard H. Donlon . " You have already seen, or will see elsewhere, a portion of the laboratory's research effort on compressors for handling higher air flows. Higher air flows through the engine are neoeaaary to obtain higher thrusts. To go with the compressors of inoreased capacities, we must also have priJ'D8.ry oombustors and afterburners which can handle higher air flows, or operate at higher velocities. ( A part of our combustion research is aimed therefore at obtaining high performance at high air velocities in the primary combustor, and it is this phase of the work that I would like to discuss now. Higa air velocities in the primary combustor result in several problems; ~ for example, stable combustion at the air velocities found in present day equipment might be analogous to keeping a matoh burning in a hurrioane. Combustion at high air velocities must occur with as high a combustion efficiency and as low pressure losses as possible. In general, combustion efficiency may be defined as the ratio of heat , . output of the combustor to the heat imput of the fuel. Pressure losses are caused by the flow resistance of the combustor liner, and changes in velocity of the air during combustion. '\ We would now like to demonstrate some results of our research to " develop combustors which can operate at high air .veloeities. The primary oombustor of the turbojet engine consists of a housing and a liner. !he liner, which is installed within the housing, shields the oombustion space from the blast of incoming air.
    [Show full text]
  • STS-1000: a High Performance Turboshaft Engine for Hybrid
    AIAA 2018-2018 Engine Design Competition Sharif University of Technology STS-IDOO: A Candidate T urboshaft Engine for Hybrid Electric Medium Altitude Long Endurance Search and Rescue UAV High PowBr to WBight Low FuBI Consumption Modular 6 Compact SIGNATURE SHEET Prof. Kaveh Ghorbanian M. Reza AminiMagham Alireza Ebrahimi Faculty Advisor Project Advisor Team Leader 952166 Amir Nazemi Abolfazl Zolfaghari Hojjat Etemadianmofrad Vahid Danesh 981123 919547 964808 964807 M. Mahdi Asnaashari Saeide Kazembeigi Mahdi Jamshidiha Amirreza Saffizadeh 952842 978931 688249 937080 Copyright © 2019 by FARAS. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with Permission Executive Summary This report proposes a turboshaft engine referred to “Sharif TurboShaft 1000 (STS-1000)” as a candidate engine to replace the baseline engine TPE331-10 for the next generation “Hybrid Electric Medium Altitude Long Endurance Search and Rescue UAV” by the year 2025. STS-1000, unlike the baseline engine, is a split single-spool turboshaft engine. The hot gas generator is a single spool with a single stage radial compressor, a reverse annular combustion chamber, and an uncooled single stage axial compressor turbine. The required shaft power is produced by a two stage axial power turbine on a separate spool which passes through the spool of the core engine and is intended to drive a power generator at the cold end of the engine. The air intake is of S-type and the exhaust duct has circular cross section. Compared to TPE331-10, STS-1000 has a higher turbine inlet temperature, a lower stage number for the air compressor, and requires less mass flow rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Technology Roadmap to 2050 | IATA
    Aircraft Technology Roadmap to 2050 NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regulations. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Association shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Furthermore, the International Air Transport Association expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without the prior written permission from: Senior Vice President Member & External Relations International Air Transport Association 33, Route de l’Aéroport 1215 Geneva 15 Airport Switzerland Table of Contents Table of Contents ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 78, No. 100/Thursday, May 23, 2013
    Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 100 / Thursday, May 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 30795 4. Will not have a significant panel outer layer, before further flight, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION economic impact, positive or negative, replace the bearing with an airworthy on a substantial number of small entities bearing. Federal Aviation Administration under the criteria of the Regulatory (iii) If there is damage on the lower side Flexibility Act. of the floor in the area of the assembly 14 CFR Part 39 opening that extends through the panel outer We prepared an economic evaluation [Docket No. FAA–2013–0262; Directorate layer (revealing an open honeycomb cell or of the estimated costs to comply with Identifier 2013–NE–13–AD] this proposed AD and placed it in the layer), before further flight, replace the AD docket. bearing with an airworthy bearing and repair RIN 2120–AA64 the floor. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 (2) After performing the actions in (d)(1)(i) Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation through (iii) of this AD, before further flight, Standard Division and Hamilton safety, Incorporation by reference, install a Teflon strip and identify the floor by Sundstrand Corporation Propellers following the Accomplishment Instructions, Safety. AGENCY: Federal Aviation paragraphs 3.E.(1) through 3.E.(4), of the Administration (FAA), DOT. The Proposed Amendment ASB. Accordingly, under the authority (3) Within 100 hours TIS, modify and re- ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking delegated to me by the Administrator, identify the rod as depicted in Figure 1 of the (NPRM). the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part ASB and by following the Accomplishment SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 39 as follows: Instructions, paragraphs 3.H.(1) through airworthiness directive (AD) for 3.H.(3)(f), of the ASB.
    [Show full text]