DOCSLIB.ORG

Geologic Controls of Shear Strength Behavior of Mudrocks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geologic Controls of Shear Strength Behavior of Mudrocks GEOLOGIC CONTROLS OF SHEAR STRENGTH BEHAVIOR OF MUDROCKS A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Ala’ M. Hajdarwish December 2006 Dissertation written by Ala’ M. Hajdarwish B. S., Yarmouk University, 1994 M. S., Yarmouk University, 1997 M. S., The University of Akron, 2001 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2006 Approved by , Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Abdul Shakoor , Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Peter Dahl , Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Neil Wells , Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Mandy Munro-Stasiuk , Graduate College Representative and Moderator Richard Meindl Accepted by , Chair, Department of Geology Donald Palmer , Dean, College of Arts and Sciences John R. D. Stalvey ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................vi LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...............................................................................................ix INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Classification of Mudrocks ..................................................................... 3 Related Research..................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ............................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH METHODS .................................................................................................8 Sampling ...............................................................................................................10 Laboratory Investigations .....................................................................................12 Natural Water Content Test ......................................................................13 Direct Shear Test.......................................................................................13 Grain Size Distribution Analysis ..............................................................13 X-ray Diffraction Analysis .......................................................................16 Dry Density, Specific Gravity, and Void Ratio Determinations ..............18 Absorption Test.........................................................................................20 Adsorption Test.........................................................................................21 Atterberg Limits Test................................................................................22 Slake Durability Index Test ......................................................................22 Data Analysis........................................................................................................23 Univariate Analysis...................................................................................23 Correlation Analysis .................................................................................24 Regression Analysis..................................................................................25 RESULTS OF DIRECT SHEAR TESTING....................................................................26 Cohesion ...............................................................................................................26 Friction Angle .......................................................................................................33 RESULTS OF LITHOLOGIC AND ENGINEERING TESTING ..................................41 iii Results of Lithologic Testing................................................................................41 Grain Size Distribution ............................................................................41 X-ray Diffraction Analysis Results...........................................................43 Results of Engineering Testing.............................................................................53 Natural Water Content .............................................................................53 Dry Density, Specific Gravity, and Void Ratio ........................................53 Absorption.................................................................................................55 Adsorption.................................................................................................56 Atterberg Limits........................................................................................57 Slake Durability ........................................................................................58 DATA ANALYSIS OF All MUDROCKS.......................................................................61 Analysis of Mudrock Data....................................................................................61 Univariate Analysis....................................................................................61 Correlation Analysis .............................................................................. ..62 Multivariate Regression analysis ..............................................................66 Multivariate Regression Analysis for Cohesion ...........................66 Multivariate Regression Analysis for Friction Angle...................73 DISCUSSION...................................................................................................................80 Limitations ............................................................................................................86 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...............................................................................87 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................90 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLES .........95 APPENDIX B: DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA............................................... 104 APPENDIX C: GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION RESULTS............................. 132 APPENDIX D: X-RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS RESULTS................... 160 APPENDIX E: WATER CONTENT DATA .................................................... 166 APPENDIX F: DRY DENSITY, SPECIFIC GRAVITY, VOID RATIO DATA .......................................................................... 170 APPENDIX G: ABSORPTION DATA............................................................. 177 APPENDIX H: ADSORPTION DATA ............................................................ 181 iv APPENDIX I: ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS .......................................... 185 APPENDIX J: SLAKE DURABILITY TEST RESULTS................................ 189 APPENDIX K: UNIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS...................... 193 APPENDIX L: BIVARIATE PLOTS ............................................................... 199 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Sample location map.......................................................................................... 12 2 Cross-sectional view of mudrock sample in the shear box................................ 14 3 Stress-strain plots for a mudrock sample under three different values of normal loads .................................................................................................. 15 4 Shear stress vs normal load plot used to obtain c and φ values ......................... 15 5 Distribution of cohesion values for all mudrocks.............................................. 28 6 Distribution of cohesion values for claystones .................................................. 29 7 Distribution of cohesion values for mudstones.................................................. 30 8 Distribution of cohesion values for siltstones.................................................... 31 9 Distribution of cohesion values for shales......................................................... 32 10 Distribution of friction angle values for all mudrocks....................................... 35 11 Distribution of friction angle values for claystones........................................... 36 12 Distribution of friction angle values for mudstones .......................................... 37 13 Distribution of friction angle values for siltstones............................................. 38 14 Distribution of friction angle values for shales.................................................. 39 15 X-ray diffractogram for claystone sample (S-10): (a) non-treated, (b) glycolated (c) heated at 350 ° C, (d) heated at 550 ° C.................................. 45 16 X-ray diffractogram for mudstone sample (S-1): (a) non-treated, (b) glycolated(c) heated at 350 ° C, (d) heated at 550 ° C................................... 47 17 X-ray diffractogram for siltstone sample (S-2): (a) non-treated, (b) glycolated(c) heated at 350 ° C, (d) heated at 550 ° C................................... 49 vi Figure Page 18 X-ray diffractogram of shale sample (S-32); (a) non-treated, (b) glycolated(c) heated at 350 ° C, (d) heated at 550 ° C................................... 51 19a Plot of regression model number and corresponding adjusted R 2 values with respect to cohesion. Refer to Table 37 for explanations of each model .... 68 19b Plot of number of variables in each model and corresponding adjusted R 2 values with respect to cohesion. Refer to Table 37 for identification of variables ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska
    Source and Bedrock Distribution of Gold and Platinum-Group Metals in the Slate Creek Area, Northern.Chistochina Mining District, East-Central Alaska By: Jeffrey Y. Foley and Cathy A. Summers Open-file report 14-90******************************************1990 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Manuel Lujan, Jr., Secretary BUREAU OF MINES T S Arv. Director TN 23 .U44 90-14 c.3 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF MINES -~ ~ . 4,~~~~1 JAMES BOYD MEMORIAL LIBRARY CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Acknowledgments 2 Location, access, and land status 2 History and production 4 Previous work 8 Geology 8 Regional and structural geologic setting 8 Rock units 8 Dacite stocks, dikes, and sills 8 Limestone 9 Argillite and sandstone 9 Differentiated igneous rocks north of the Slate Creek Fault Zone 10 Granitic rocks 16 Tertiary conglomerate 16 Geochemistry and metallurgy 18 Mineralogy 36 Discussion 44 Recommendations 45 References 47 ILLUSTRATIONS 1. Map of Slate Creek and surrounding area, in the northern Chistochina Mining District 3 2. Geologic map of the Slate Creek area, showing sample localities and cross section (in pocket) 3. North-dipping slaty argillite with lighter-colored sandstone intervals in lower Miller Gulch 10 4. North-dipping differentiated mafic and ultramafic sill capping ridge and overlying slaty argillite at upper Slate Creek 11 5. Dike swarm cutting Jurassic-Cretaceous turbidites in Miller Gulch 12 6 60-ft-wide diorite porphyry and syenodiorite porphyry dike at Miller Gulch 13 7. Map showing the locations of PGM-bearing mafic and ultramafic rocks and major faults in the east-central Alaska Range 14 8. Major oxides versus Thornton-Tuttle differentiation index 17 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Cement Stabilization on the Strength of the Bawen's Siltstone
    MATEC Web of Conferences 195, 03012 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819503012 ICRMCE 2018 The effect of cement stabilization on the strength of the Bawen’s siltstone Edi Hartono1,3, Sri Prabandiyani Retno Wardani2, and Agus Setyo Muntohar3,* 1 Ph.D Student, Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Abstract. Siltstones are predominantly found along the Bawen toll-road. Siltstone is degradable soil due to weather session. The soil is susceptible to the drying and wetting and the changes in moisture content. Thus, Siltstone is problematic soils in its bearing capacity when served as a subgrade or subbase. The main objective of this study was to investigate the effect of cement stabilization on the strength of Siltstone. The primary laboratory test to evaluate the strength was Unconfined Compression Strength (UCS) and California Bearing Ratio (CBR). The cement content was varied from 2 to 12 per cent by weight of the dry soil. The soils were collected from the Ungaran – Bawen toll road. The specimens were tested after seven days of moist-curing in controlled temperature room of 25oC. The CBR test was performed after soaking under water for four days to observe the swelling. The results show that the mudstones were less swelling after soaking. Cement-stabilized siltstone increased the CBR value and the UCS significantly. The addition of optimum cement content for siltstone stabilization was about 7 to 10 per cent. 1 Introduction Rock lithology that includes claystone, siltstone, mudstone and shale is also known as mudrocks.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Nimrod Area Granite County Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1958 Geology of the Nimrod area Granite County Montana Joel Kenneth Montgomery The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Montgomery, Joel Kenneth, "Geology of the Nimrod area Granite County Montana" (1958). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 7095. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/7095 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. aUv DATE DUE .**'“ '■’ K ^-r>o<> . t_A \J ^ D e c 0 1 ]ggg ^ A H 1 5 GEOLOGY OP THE NIMROD AREA GRANITE COUNTY, MONTANA by JOEL K. MONTGOMERY B. S. Brigham Young University, 1956 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1958 Approved by: Chairman, Board of ^aminers Dean, Graduate School 2 0 1953 bate UMl Number: EP37896 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT OisMftartion Publishing UMl EP37896 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho
    Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Some Belt Rocks, Montana and Idaho By J. E. HARRISON and D. J. GRIMES CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1312-O A comparison of rocks from two widely separated areas in Belt terrane UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1970 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 75-607766 4- V For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Price 35 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................................................................................. Ol Introduction ............................:.................................... .......................................... 2 General geology ...............................................................;.'................................... 3 Methods of investigation ........................y .............................................................. 7 Sampling procedure ..............................:....................................................... 7 Analytical technique for mineralogy ...............:............................................ 11 Analytical technique and calculations for geochemistry................................ 13 Mineralogy of rock types........................................................................................ 29 Geochemistry .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lacustrine Massive Mudrock in the Eocene Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China: Nature, Origin and Significance
    Marine and Petroleum Geology 77 (2016) 1042e1055 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Research paper Lacustrine massive mudrock in the Eocene Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China: Nature, origin and significance * Jianguo Zhang a, b, Zaixing Jiang a, b, , Chao Liang c, Jing Wu d, Benzhong Xian e, f, Qing Li e, f a College of Energy, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China b Institute of Earth Science, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China c School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum (east China), Qingdao 266580, China d Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China e College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China f State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, Beijing 102249, China article info abstract Article history: Massive mudrock refers to mudrock with internally homogeneous characteristics and an absence of Received 13 May 2016 laminae. Previous studies were primarily conducted in the marine environment, while notably few Accepted 6 August 2016 studies have investigated lacustrine massive mudrock. Based on core observation in the lacustrine Available online 8 August 2016 environment of the Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China, massive mudrock is a common deep water fine-grained sedimentary rock. There are two types of massive mudrock. Both types are sharply delin- Keywords: eated at the bottom and top contacts, abundant in angular terrigenous debris, and associated with Massive mudrock oxygen-rich (higher than 2 ml O /L H O) but lower water salinities in comparison to adjacent black Muddy mass transportation deposit 2 2 Turbiditic mudrock shales.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Plateau Coring Project, Phase I (CPCP-I)
    Science Reports Sci. Dril., 24, 15–40, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-24-15-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Colorado Plateau Coring Project, Phase I (CPCP-I): a continuously cored, globally exportable chronology of Triassic continental environmental change from western North America Paul E. Olsen1, John W. Geissman2, Dennis V. Kent3,1, George E. Gehrels4, Roland Mundil5, Randall B. Irmis6, Christopher Lepre1,3, Cornelia Rasmussen6, Dominique Giesler4, William G. Parker7, Natalia Zakharova8,1, Wolfram M. Kürschner9, Charlotte Miller10, Viktoria Baranyi9, Morgan F. Schaller11, Jessica H. Whiteside12, Douglas Schnurrenberger13, Anders Noren13, Kristina Brady Shannon13, Ryan O’Grady13, Matthew W. Colbert14, Jessie Maisano14, David Edey14, Sean T. Kinney1, Roberto Molina-Garza15, Gerhard H. Bachman16, Jingeng Sha17, and the CPCD team* 1Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY 10964, USA 2Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA 3Earth and Planetary Sciences, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA 4Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 5Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Rd., Berkeley CA 94709, USA 6Natural History Museum of Utah and Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA 7Petrified Forest National Park, Petrified Forest, AZ 86028, USA 8Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48859, USA 9Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway 10MARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 11Earth and Environmental Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Troy, NY 12180, USA 12National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK 13Continental Scientific Drilling Coordination Office and LacCore Facility, N.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stability Back Analysis Using Rocscience Software
    Slope Stability Back Analysis using Rocscience Software A question we are frequently asked is, “Can Slide do back analysis?” The answer is YES, as we will discover in this article, which describes various methods of back analysis using Slide and other Rocscience software. In this article we will discuss the following topics: Back analysis of material strength using sensitivity or probabilistic analysis in Slide Back analysis of other parameters (e.g. groundwater conditions) Back analysis of support force for required factor of safety Manual and advanced back analysis Introduction When a slope has failed an analysis is usually carried out to determine the cause of failure. Given a known (or assumed) failure surface, some form of “back analysis” can be carried out in order to determine or estimate the material shear strength, pore pressure or other conditions at the time of failure. The back analyzed properties can be used to design remedial slope stability measures. Although the current version of Slide (version 6.0) does not have an explicit option for the back analysis of material properties, it is possible to carry out back analysis using the sensitivity or probabilistic analysis modules in Slide, as we will describe in this article. There are a variety of methods for carrying out back analysis: Manual trial and error to match input data with observed behaviour Sensitivity analysis for individual variables Probabilistic analysis for two correlated variables Advanced probabilistic methods for simultaneous analysis of multiple parameters We will discuss each of these various methods in the following sections. Note that back analysis does not necessarily imply that failure has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Slate Shale/Mudrock Regional 060(240)±20/70±10SE 020(200)±20/20±10NW No 060(240)±20/70±10SE 120(300)±20/20±10SW Yes No Q
    Name: Reg. lab day: M Tu W Th F Geology 1013 Field trip to Black River Valley (Lab #7, Answer Key) Drive south on Gaspereau Avenue and stop at the Highway 101 overpass. Stop 1: HALIFAX GROUP A: Go to the north side of the overpass. slate a) Name the rock exposed in this outcrop. b) What was the original rock before metamorphism? Shale/mudrock c) Was the metamorphism regional or contact? regional d) Use the compass to measure strike & dip of cleavage. 060(240)±20/70±10SE e) Use the compass to measure strike & dip of bedding. 020(200)±20/20±10NW f) Is cleavage parallel to bedding? no g) Plot cleavage and bedding on the attached map using the proper symbols. B: Go to the south side of the overpass. 060(240)±20/70±10SE a) Use the compass to measure strike & dip of cleavage. 120(300)±20/20±10SW b) Use the compass to measure strike & dip of bedding. c) Is the cleavage orientation similar to that in (d) above? yes d) Is the bedding orientation similar to that in (e) above? no Drive on through Gaspereau to White Rock. Go through the intersection in White Rock and stop in the big quarry on the right. Stop 2: WHITE ROCK FORMATION quartzite a) Name the rock. quartz sandstone b) What was the original rock before metamorphism? c) This rock unit is more resistant to weathering than the Halifax Formation. Suggest reasons why. 1. composition (hard, chemically inert mineral) 2. no foliation (no planes of weakness) Black River Lab – Answer Key Page 2 of 4 Drive back through White Rock, turn south, and stop at the parking area at the Gaspereau River bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil and Rock Properties
    Soil and rock properties W.A.C. Bennett Dam, BC Hydro 1 1) Basic testing methods 2) Soil properties and their estimation 3) Problem-oriented classification of soils 2 1 Consolidation Apparatus (“oedometer”) ELE catalogue 3 Oedometers ELE catalogue 4 2 Unconfined compression test on clay (undrained, uniaxial) ELE catalogue 5 Triaxial test on soil ELE catalogue 6 3 Direct shear (shear box) test on soil ELE catalogue 7 Field test: Standard Penetration Test (STP) ASTM D1586 Drop hammers: Standard “split spoon” “Old U.K.” “Doughnut” “Trip” sampler (open) 18” (30.5 cm long) ER=50 ER=45 ER=60 Test: 1) Place sampler to the bottom 2) Drive 18”, count blows for every 6” 3) Recover sample. “N” value = number of blows for the last 12” Corrections: ER N60 = N 1) Energy ratio: 60 Precautions: 2) Overburden depth 1) Clean hole 1.7N 2) Sampler below end Effective vertical of casing N1 = pressure (tons/ft2) 3) Cobbles 0.7 +σ v ' 8 4 Field test: Borehole vane (undrained shear strength) Procedure: 1) Place vane to the bottom 2) Insert into clay 3) Rotate, measure peak torque 4) Turn several times, measure remoulded torque 5) Calculate strength 1.0 Correction: 0.6 Bjerrum’s correction PEAK 0 20% P.I. 100% Precautions: Plasticity REMOULDED 1) Clean hole Index 2) Sampler below end of casing ASTM D2573 3) No rod friction 9 Soil properties relevant to slope stability: 1) “Drained” shear strength: - friction angle, true cohesion - curved strength envelope 2) “Undrained” shear strength: - apparent cohesion 3) Shear failure behaviour: - contractive, dilative, collapsive
    [Show full text]
  • A) Conglomerate B) Dolostone C) Siltstone D) Shale 1. Which
    1. Which sedimentary rock would be composed of 7. Which process could lead most directly to the particles ranging in size from 0.0004 centimeter to formation of a sedimentary rock? 0.006 centimeter? A) metamorphism of unmelted material A) conglomerate B) dolostone B) slow solidification of molten material C) siltstone D) shale C) sudden upwelling of lava at a mid-ocean ridge 2. Which sedimentary rock could form as a result of D) precipitation of minerals from evaporating evaporation? water A) conglomerate B) sandstone 8. Base your answer to the following question on the C) shale D) limestone diagram below. 3. Limestone is a sedimentary rock which may form as a result of A) melting B) recrystallization C) metamorphism D) biologic processes 4. The dot below is a true scale drawing of the smallest particle found in a sample of cemented sedimentary rock. Which sedimentary rock is shown in the diagram? What is this sedimentary rock? A) conglomerate B) sandstone C) siltstone D) shale A) conglomerate B) sandstone C) siltstone D) shale 9. Which statement about the formation of a rock is best supported by the rock cycle? 5. Which sequence of events occurs in the formation of a sedimentary rock? A) Magma must be weathered before it can change to metamorphic rock. A) B) Sediment must be compacted and cemented before it can change to sedimentary rock. B) C) Sedimentary rock must melt before it can change to metamorphic rock. C) D) Metamorphic rock must melt before it can change to sedimentary rock. D) 6. Which sedimentary rock formed from the compaction and cementation of fragments of the skeletons and shells of sea organisms? A) shale B) gypsum C) limestone D) conglomerate Base your answers to questions 10 and 11 on the diagram below, which is a geologic cross section of an area where a river has exposed a 300-meter cliff of sedimentary rock layers.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    Michael Kenney Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon The Paleozoic Era spans about 250 Myrs of Earth History from 541 Ma to 254 Ma (Figure 1). Within Grand Canyon National Park, there is a fragmented record of this time, which has undergone little to no deformation. These still relatively flat-lying, stratified layers, have been the focus of over 100 years of geologic studies. Much of what we know today began with the work of famed naturalist and geologist, Edwin Mckee (Beus and Middleton, 2003). His work, in addition to those before and after, have led to a greater understanding of sedimentation processes, fossil preservation, the evolution of life, and the drastic changes to Earth’s climate during the Paleozoic. This paper seeks to summarize, generally, the Paleozoic strata, the environments in which they were deposited, and the sources from which the sediments were derived. Tapeats Sandstone (~525 Ma – 515 Ma) The Tapeats Sandstone is a buff colored, quartz-rich sandstone and conglomerate, deposited unconformably on the Grand Canyon Supergroup and Vishnu metamorphic basement (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Thickness varies from ~100 m to ~350 m depending on the paleotopography of the basement rocks upon which the sandstone was deposited. The base of the unit contains the highest abundance of conglomerates. Cobbles and pebbles sourced from the underlying basement rocks are common in the basal unit. Grain size and bed thickness thins upwards (Middleton and Elliott, 2003). Common sedimentary structures include planar and trough cross-bedding, which both decrease in thickness up-sequence. Fossils are rare but within the upper part of the sequence, body fossils date to the early Cambrian (Middleton and Elliott, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]