Carbon Disclosure Project S.C

Home , Raid (insecticide)

CDP 2013 CDP Supply Chain 2013 Information Request Carbon Disclosure Project S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

Module: Introduction

Page: Introduction Supply Chain

Climate change

Please tick the box below to complete the introduction questions for Climate Change true

0.1

Introduction

Please give a general description and introduction to your organization.

SC Johnson is a family-owned and managed business dedicated to innovative, high-quality products, excellence in the workplace and a long-term commitment to the environment and the communities in which it operates. Based in the USA, the company is one of the world's leading manufacturers of household cleaning products and products for home storage, air care, pest control and shoe care. It markets such well-known brands as GLADE®, KIWI®, OFF!®, PLEDGE®, RAID®, SCRUBBING BUBBLES®, SHOUT®, WINDEX® and ZIPLOC® in the U.S. and beyond, with brands marketed outside the U.S. including AUTAN®, TANA®, BAMA®, BAYGON®, BRISE®, KABIKILLER®, KLEAR®, MR. MUSCLE®, and RIDSECT®. The 127-year-old company, that generates $9 billion in sales, employs nearly 13,000 people globally and sells products in virtually every country around the world. www.scjohnson.com

0.2

Reporting Year Please state the start and end date of the year for which you are reporting data. The current reporting year is the latest/most recent 12-month period for which data is reported. Enter the dates of this year first. We request data for more than one reporting period for some emission accounting questions. Please provide data for the three years prior to the current reporting year if you have not provided this information before, or if this is the first time you have answered CDP information request. (This does not apply if you have been offered and selected the option of answering the shorter questionnaire). If you are going to provide additional years of data, please give the dates of those reporting periods here. Work backwards from the most recent reporting year. Please enter dates in following format: day/month/year (in full i.e. 2001).

Enter Periods that will be disclosed

Sun 01 Jan 2012 - Mon 31 Dec 2012

0.3

Country list configuration

Please select the countries for which you will be supplying data. This selection will be carried forward to assist you in completing your response.

Select country

Argentina Austria Australia Albania Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Select country

Ecuador Egypt France Germany Ghana Greece Hong Kong Hungary India Indonesia Israel Italy Japan Kazakhstan Kenya Malaysia Mexico Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Nigeria Pakistan Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Romania Russia Saudi Arabia Serbia Singapore Select country

Slovakia Slovenia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Turkey Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay Venezuela Vietnam

0.4

Currency selection

Please select the currency in which you would like to submit your response. All financial information contained in the response should be in this currency.

USD($)

0.5

Please select if you wish to complete a shorter information request.

Water

Please tick the box below to complete the introduction questions for Water false

Module: Management [Investor]

Page: 1. Governance

1.1

Where is the highest level of direct responsibility for climate change within your company?

Senior Manager/Officer

1.1a

Please identify the position of the individual or name of the committee with this responsibility

1.2

Do you provide incentives for the management of climate change issues, including the attainment of targets?

Yes

1.2a

Please complete the table

Who is entitled to benefit from The type of incentives Incentivized performance indicator these incentives?

Environment/Sustainability Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets managers Energy managers Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Facility managers Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Board chairman Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Board/Executive board Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Director on board Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Corporate executive team Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Chief Operating Officer (COO) Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Other: Chief Sustainability Officer Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Other: Technical exempt staff Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Monetary reward Meeting carbon emission reduction targets

Page: 2. Strategy

2.1

Please select the option that best describes your risk management procedures with regard to climate change risks and opportunities

Integrated into multi-disciplinary company wide risk management processes

2.1a

Please provide further details

At SC Johnson, sustainability is embedded throughout the organization. Our holistic approach to sustainability includes climate change risk assessment and management as a key element. We monitor media for consumer response and public opinion, scientific literature for changes in risks and opportunities for mitigation, the regulatory space for changes in regulations and activity with third party organizations to monitor trends which may negatively impact our corporate reputation if not appropriately addressed. These risks are monitored continuously for their potential impact on the company as a whole and for any possible impact at the local subsidiary level. In this way, urgent issues can be dealt with as they arise. In addition, quarterly reports are compiled and evaluated. Quarterly reporting matches the frequency with which the Corporate Executive Committee (CEC) and Board of Directors track progress against SC Johnson’s annual goals, and such reports are reviewed by the CEC as a part of this process When a new climate change risk arises or a change in an already identified risk occurs, the Corporate Sustainability department evaluates the situation and any potential impacts before making a recommendation to the CEC. Opportunities are evaluated taking into account, among other factors, the potential impact to the company, available resources, and various financial metrics, including return on investment and capital expenditure required for execution of the plan.

2.2

Is climate change integrated into your business strategy?

Yes

2.2a

Please describe the process and outcomes

For decades, SC Johnson has been steadfast in its environmental commitment and spirit of innovation. For SC Johnson, creating sustainable environmental value means protecting resources and the planet for future generations. That goal influences how the company powers its operations, develops its formulas, and manufactures and packages its products. The company recognizes the need for business to address global climate change. SC Johnson’s purpose is to make the world a better place by building superior brands and businesses that are a positive force in the world’s economy. It is committed to achieving this while simultaneously doing what is right for employees, consumers, customers, the communities the company is a part of and the environment. And because SC Johnson is a private company, we can take a long-term view that publicly traded companies focusing on short-term gains may not be able to take. The company’s sustainability efforts target four key platform areas where SC Johnson can make the biggest impact on quality of life, economic progress, the company’s product mix and the planet. These platforms are: Fewer Resources, Less Waste, Winning Products and overall doing Greater Good. Using Fewer Resources is the most pertinent for discussions of climate change, and SC Johnson works to keep carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere by reducing fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions through a wide range of innovative efforts at all global facilities and throughout its value chain. For more than a decade, SC Johnson has continually established and achieved goals that have helped the company lessen its impact on the world. SC Johnson believes that to make gains, goals must be set. That is why in 2000, the company established its first greenhouse gas emissions benchmark for its five largest international manufacturing plants. In 2002, two more SC Johnson plants voluntarily joined the efforts as well. In addition, that year SC Johnson joined the U.S. Climate Leaders program and set a second GHG reduction goal that covered all U.S. operations. By 2005, the company had surpassed its goals for both the United States and for its seven largest plants. So in 2007, aggressive new objectives were announced for 2011 to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 8% versus the 2005 baseline and cut greenhouse gas emissions from all worldwide factories by 12% versus the 2000 baseline. Thanks to ongoing efficiency improvements as well as renewable energy projects, by 2011 the company had achieved a 26% reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions. In the United States, SC Johnson far surpassed our objective, cutting emissions 27% versus 2005. Once again in 2011, we set new goals for the future. Our 2016 sustainability goals include the following: - Reduce our carbon footprint by decreasing our upstream footprint by 8%, reduce our greenhouse gas emissions from our worldwide factories by another 6%, increase our use of renewable energy to 44% of total electricity use worldwide and decrease our downstream footprint by 2%. - In addition, we’ve committed to reducing waste by increasing our post-consumer-recycled content across our product packaging to 30%, decrease packaging across our product lines by 5% and offset 30% of virgin material use through innovative partnership and packaging advances - Communicate transparently to the people who buy our products about the material we use and the impact of our operations - Continue to improve our products through our patented Greenlist™ ingredient classification process, increasing use of ingredients rated by our system as “better” or “best” in 2001 from 51% in 2011 to 58% by 2016.

Due to the company’s continued commitment to sustainability and GHG reductions, consumers and independent rankings recognize the company as a leader in the consumer products field. As two examples, SC Johnson was recognized with an EPA Climate Leadership Award in 2012 for Excellence in Greenhouse Gas Management and ranks SC Johnson #7 on the EPA’s Green Power Partners Top 20 On-Site Generation list. As mentioned above, SC Johnson has set publically declared goals relating to climate change and which are integrated into the business strategy of the company. The goals relate to carbon footprint reduction and are aimed at reductions in scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, as defined in the Greenhouse Gas Protocol, as well as waste reduction. These goals are an integrated part of the company’s 5 year strategic plan and are measured and reported annually, for all corporate facilities, globally. The strategy for GHG reduction has been driven primarily by the corporate philosophy of “doing what is right” and is underpinned by the desire to develop products in the most sustainable way and to maintain the reputation of the company as an environmental leader. The most important components of the corporate short term strategy that have been influenced by climate change have been the selection of materials for use in the products that we manufacture, increasing recycled content of the packaging materials used and increasing focus on waste reduction and transportation with reduced carbon footprint. The short term strategies involve annual targets which are rolled up into the 5 year plan. The longer term corporate strategy embodies the same elements as the short term strategy but also involves longer term strategy including measuring our progress against our year 2000 baseline. Successful execution of the long term strategy requires longer term, capital intensive programs such as increasing the on-site production of renewable energy by installing a co-generation plant which uses land-fill gas, installation of wind turbines and boilers which use biomass waste as fuel. The most substantial business decisions made relating to climate control go back to 1976, and even before, when the decision was made to remove Chlorinated Fluorocarbons from our aerosol products, prior to regulation, because these chemicals were determined to be damaging the upper ozone layer which protects the planet. Since then we have made numerous additional decisions underpinned by climate change factors. These include the use of intermodal transportation to reduce the energy use, and carbon emissions associated with shipping of products, and the numerous renewable energy projects mentioned above.

2.2b

Please explain why not

2.3

Do you engage in activities that could either directly or indirectly influence policy on climate change through any of the following? (tick all that apply)

Direct engagement Trade associations Funding research organizations

2.3a

On what issues have you been engaging directly?

Focus of Corporate Proposed solution Details of engagement legislation Position SC Johnson has engaged with federal lawmakers to encourage the development of a longer-term tax incentive strategy for making renewable energy projects more financially feasible and achievable. Specifically, SC Johnson has advocated for tax policies that recognize and take into account the time it takes to develop and bring large renewable energy projects on line, often on a 3-5 year timeline. For example, extending important federal SC Johnson will continue to engage with lawmakers Clean tax incentive programs, such as the Production Tax Credit or the Sec. 48 in the hope of promulgating legislation which takes energy Support Investment Tax Credit, for only 1-2 years at a time makes it much more these factors into account and provides incentives generation difficult to plan for the long-term and puts significant pressure on equipment for installation of clean energy generation systems. suppliers, leading to delivery slowdowns as the end of the a tax year approaches. SCJ has recommended to the tax-writing committees of the US Senate and House of Representatives that tax credit extensions be done in a manner that enhances a company’ ability to efficiently plan and execute large, multi-year projects. SC Johnson has been a member since 2008 of the SmartWay® Transport Partnership program, a voluntary, collaborative partnership with U.S. EPA. Partners in the program, which include freight carriers as well as shippers like SC Johnson, commit to improving the environmental performance of their freight operations. In return, they gain access to tools and strategies to SC Johnson will continue to partner with the improve fuel efficiency and reduce the environmental footprint of their freight Smartway program in the US and to look for similar operations, such as intermodal shipping, warehouse improvements and idle Energy opportunities in other countries. We will also Support reduction. In recent years, our company has implemented anti-idling policies efficiency continue to work with legislators to promote at its U.S. facilities, increased intermodal shipping, and added a requirement regulations which allowmore efficient use of road of SmartWay® participation to its carrier-selection process. As of the end of and other transportation. 2011, 96 per cent of SC Johnson carriers were SmartWay® partners. To build on the success of fleet improvements like SmartWay®, SC Johnson has advocated for federal legislation that would allow states to raise interstate truck weight limits from the current 80,000 lbs. to a maximum of 97,000 lbs. for vehicles equipped with an additional sixth axle (but still Focus of Corporate Proposed solution Details of engagement legislation Position operating on today’s existing 53-foot maximum length trailers). Increasing current truck weight limits would result in significant benefits from an overall efficiency and environmental standpoint. Our transportation and logistics experts have studied this issue closely and some of the projected “metrics” for SC Johnson if increased truck weight limits were implemented nationwide include: a 27% reduction in semi-trailers operating between SC Johnson’s manufacturing plant and warehouse facilities; 4,776-plus semi-trailers operated by SC Johnson removed from U.S. roadways annually; and 5 million-plus fewer miles driven by semi-trailers on U.S. roadways. While federal legislation may be the preferred route to enact this change in policy, such as the Safe and Efficient Transportation Act of 2013 (H.R. 612), recently introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives, SC Johnson also has encouraged policymakers to work with the U.S. Department of Transportation to explore non-legislative solutions to addressing the economic and environmental challenges and opportunities facing the nation’s freight transportation network, including promoting pilot programs to demonstrate that truck weight limits can be raised safely and with significant environmental benefits.

2.3b

Are you on the Board of any trade associations or provide funding beyond membership? Yes

2.3c

Please enter the details of those trade associations that are likely to take a position on climate change legislation Is your position on climate Trade change How have you, or are you attempting to influence the association Please explain the trade association's position consistent postion?

with theirs?

American Consistent ACI has the following definition of sustainability as it relates to SC Johnson is represented on both the board of the ACI and Is your position on climate Trade change How have you, or are you attempting to influence the association Please explain the trade association's position consistent postion?

with theirs?

Cleaning the production and sale of cleaning products: ACI Sustainability on the Sustainability Committee. Through these groups, we Institute Definition : The ability to improve the quality of life for this and have been instrumental in shaping the policy and principles of future generations, by creating products that promote hygiene the organization as they relate to sustainability. SC Johnson and cleanliness, are environmentally sound, and are also provides data on carbon emissions, energy usage, waste economically successful. The association also declares the and other environmental metrics for the ACI Sustainability following sustainability mission: ACI Sustainability Mission : To Report which reports on the industry as a whole. SC Johnson benefit society and improve the quality of life through hygiene has been a contributor to this since the pilot stage of the and cleanliness by driving sustainability improvements across program and has continued over the past 4-5 years. our industry and throughout the supply chain. While these definitions do not explicitly refer to climate change they do talk about sustainability and the environment and in their principles of sustainability they state that one of the organizations principles is "To promote sustainable innovations that will help reduce the overall environmental impacts of our industry".

2.3d

Do you publically disclose a list of all the research organizations that you fund?

2.3e

Do you fund any research organizations to produce public work on climate change?

Yes

2.3f Please describe the work and how it aligns with your own strategy on climate change

SC Johnson is a funder of the World Resources Institute (WRI), a cross functional not for profit group which expresses its mission as follows "Our mission is to move human society to live in ways that protect Earth’s environment and its capacity to provide for the needs and aspirations of current and future generations". One of the WRI goals is around Climate, Energy and Transport where they have a climate protection goal "Protect the global climate system from further harm due to emissions of greenhouse gases and help humanity and the natural world adapt to unavoidable climate change". SC Johnson is active in WRI discussions, contributing from first hand experience in areas of expertize such as renewable energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction.

2.3g

Please provide details of the other engagement activities that you undertake

2.3h

What processes do you have in place to ensure that all of your direct and indirect activities that influence policy are consistent with your overall climate change strategy?

Any funding of external organizations or participation in groups and committees relating to sustainability in general, including climate control, is channelled through the SC Johnson corporate Office of Sustainability, and ultimately to the Chief Sustainability Officer, who reports to the Company's Chairman and CEO. The Office of Sustainability approves all public statements and strategies relating to climate change, thereby ensuring that they align with the overarching corporate strategies.

2.3i

Please explain why you do not engage with policy makers

Page: 3. Targets and Initiatives

3.1 Did you have an emissions reduction target that was active (ongoing or reached completion) in the reporting year?

Intensity target

3.1a

Please provide details of your absolute target

Base year % of % reduction from emissions ID Scope emissions in Base year Target year Comment base year (metric tonnes scope CO2e)

3.1b

Please provide details of your intensity target

% of % reduction Normalized ID Scope emissions from base Metric Base year base year Target year Comment in scope year emissions

Scope metric tonnes CO2e per metric To meet or exceed 5 A1 70% 10% 2010 12.2 2016 1+2 tonne of product year target.

3.1c

Please also indicate what change in absolute emissions this intensity target reflects

Direction of change anticipated in % change anticipated Direction of change anticipated in % change anticipated ID absolute Scope 1+2 emissions at in absolute Scope 1+2 absolute Scope 3 emissions at target in absolute Scope 3 Comment target completion? emissions completion? emissions

A2 Decrease 10 Decrease

3.1d

Please provide details on your progress against this target made in the reporting year

ID % complete (time) % complete (emissions) Comment

A3 40% 60%

3.1e

Please explain (i) why not; and (ii) forecast how your emissions will change over the next five years

3.2

Does the use of your goods and/or services directly enable GHG emissions to be avoided by a third party?

3.2a

Please provide details (see guidance)

3.3

Did you have emissions reduction initiatives that were active within the reporting year (this can include those in the planning and implementation phases)

Yes

3.3a

Please identify the total number of projects at each stage of development, and for those in the implementation stages, the estimated CO2e savings

Total estimated annual CO2e savings in metric tonnes Stage of development Number of projects CO2e (only for rows marked *)

Under investigation 3 15000 To be implemented* 2 13500 Implementation commenced* 2 13500 Implemented* 2 13500 Not to be implemented 1 1500

3.3b

For those initiatives implemented in the reporting year, please provide details in the table below

Annual monetary Estimated annual savings Investment required Payback Activity type Description of activity CO2e savings (unit (unit currency - as period (metric tonnes currency - specified in Q0.4) CO2e) as specified

in Q0.4)

Low carbon Install biomass water heater in Surabaya Indonesia to combust energy 7700 1-3 years waste rice husks to displace natural gas. installation Low carbon Install two 1.5 MW wind turbines at our largest manufacturing site 4-10 energy in Racine Wisconsin, USA. Onsite wind electricity will reduce 5800 years installation purchased grid electricity.

3.3c

What methods do you use to drive investment in emissions reduction activities?

Method Comment

Bonuses are awarded based upon achievement of objectives, including objectives relating to Internal incentives/recognition programs emission reduction targets Financial optimization calculations

Emission reduction projects can be approved with lower ROI if the project will be great for business Lower return on investment (ROI) specification and lessen CO2 emissions footprint

3.3d

If you do not have any emissions reduction initiatives, please explain why not

Page: 4. Communication

4.1

Have you published information about your company’s response to climate change and GHG emissions performance for this reporting year in places other than in your CDP response? If so, please attach the publication(s)

Page/Section Publication Attach the document reference

In voluntary communications https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/50/30450/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Page 18: Smaller (underway) – previous year Documents/Attachments/Investor-4.1-C3- Footprint section attached IdentifytAttachment/2012_SCJohnson_SustainabilityReport[1].pdf

Further Information

Please note that our reporting period for this CDP report is calendar year 2012 and while the attached report is the Sustainability report for 2012 it reflects data from calendar year 2011. This is the reason for labelling it as previous year.

Module: Risks and Opportunities [Investor]

Page: 5. Climate Change Risks

5.1

Have you identified any climate change risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply

Risks driven by changes in regulation Risks driven by changes in physical climate parameters

5.1a

Please describe your risks driven by changes in regulation

Potential Direct/ Magnitude ID Risk driver Description Timeframe Likelihood impact Indirect of impact

A number of air Pollution regulations exist today and already impact the business of SC Johnson either in restricting materials used in product formulations or by restricting emissions from manufacturing facilities. For example the California Air Resources Board (and other jurisdictions) regulations on Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions from products set VOC emission limits from the use of Increased Air pollution B1 chemically formulated consumer products. There are also numerous operational Current Direct Very likely Medium limits regulations limiting emissions from production facilities, for example cost those implemented by the Wisconsin DNR to regulate emissions in Wisconsin which directly impact our main production facility in Racine, WI. These regulations require SC Johnson to apply for permits and to control emissions and this requires significant investment of staff and capital equipment. Renewable energy regulation, coupled with greenhouse gas reduction targets, may require companies like SC Johnson to invest in higher Renewable levels of renewable energy in order to meet the requirements. This Increased Medium- B2 energy requires heavy capital investment, at the multi million dollar level and, >10 years Direct Very likely capital cost high regulation potentially, drives up the cost of production for our products. Typical projects to produce significant renewable energy, cost upwards of $10million

5.1b

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk and (iii) the costs associated with these actions

B1 Air Pollution Limits: (i) the potential financial risks of imposed Air Pollution limits are significant to SC Johnson. Limits on product formulation emissions in consumer use have already resulted in the need for significant re-formulations to bring products into compliance (e.g. California VOC regulations). In the best case this requires significant product development time and resources including laboratory formulation, claims substantiation, product compatibility testing, product scale up, system and label changes, as well as product testing with the consumer to ensure that the new product meets their needs. The resources to undertake this for a typical product can be significant and any changes in production equipment requirements, increased cost of raw materials or loss of sales due to consumer dissatisfaction can all further erode profits. At the production site emission level, significant investment in production equipment may be required to provide filters, scrubbers, and capture systems to control plant emissions. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically. (ii) SC Johnson is not unduly concerned by regulations around Air Pollution Limits because we already manage these issues proactively by appropriate selection of the materials we use in our products and by controlling the emissions from our factories. Sustainability is embedded throughout the organization and every project is approached with the environment in mind. Since 2001 we have employed our patented Greenlist™ process in the selection of all materials used in our products. The Greenlist™ process goes beyond regulations to help us select materials with improved environmental and human health profiles. As a part of this process, the Greenlist™ takes into account the VOC levels and any potential for air pollution in the materials we use, ensuring that we minimize these factors as far as possible. Additionally, we have been complying with California VOC emission regulations for more than a decade and this ensures that our products have the lowest possible VOC levels. In the case of Air emissions from production facilities, again we take a pro-active approach to meet and exceed current regulations and to anticipate future regulations. We have stringent internal standards to restrict emissions of all kinds and regularly conduct audits of our facilities to ensure these standards are being met. In cases where regulations already exist we work closely with the regulating agencies to ensure that we both understand the regulations and comply with them. Examples of this include the DNR in Wisconsin and government agencies in the Netherlands where our largest European manufacturing site is located. (iii) Over the past 10-20 years we have made significant investments to both re-formulate our products to reduce Air Pollutant content, and to reduce emissions from our production facilities. Since the California and other VOC regulations were introduced, we have re-formulated many of our product lines at significant cost. We have also invested heavily in sophisticated production equipment and material handling equipment at our production facilities during that same period. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically. B2 Renewable Energy regulation: Some years ago, SC Johnson identified Renewable Energy regulation as a potential risk to the company and, for this and other reasons, as a company we have undertaken numerous programs over the past 15-20 years to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels globally. (i) the potential financial risks of increasing renewable energy regulation are substantial for companies like SC Johnson whether through increased energy charges, increased regulations on carbon emissions or even potential plant closure due to non-compliance. In recent years we have already seen substantial increases in fossil fuels in many parts of the world and this is likely to continue unless renewable energy is substituted. It is likely that we could see a 10-20% increase in fossil fuel costs over the next 10-20 years, which would directly impact the profitability of the company (ii) Over the past 15-20 years, SC Johnson has made significant investments in numerous programs to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels globally The company continues to substitute traditional fuels with renewable and alternative sources, including co-generation at its Racine, Wisconsin facility, wind turbines at its Netherlands and Wisconsin facilities, small wind turbines at its Racine headquarters and its largest U.S. sales office in Arkansas, and palm shells and rice husks as biofuels at two manufacturing plants in Indonesia. We are also engaged in significant power purchase agreements at some of our larger plants, to supplement the renewable energy usage. The company continues to look far into the future to globally assess the role regulation could play across all of its markets and as a result of continued efficiency improvements and a decreasing reliance on fossil fuels, SC Johnson is positioned well for potential future renewable energy regulations. The company has had rolling five year objectives since 2000 to increase the use of renewable energy and to reduce the carbon emissions from its operations. (iii) Global Investment, by SC Johnson, on renewable energy projects in this timeframe has been significant. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically.

5.1c

Please describe your risks that are driven by change in physical climate parameters

Direct/ Potential Magnitude ID Risk driver Description Timeframe Indirect Likelihood impact of impact

Changes in weather patterns, precipitation patterns, as well as sea level rise could have adverse effects to certain suppliers throughout SC Johnson’s supply chain. This could also potentially Change in affect the transport and availability of the materials the company Increased Indirect precipitation About as Low- B3 purchases. Because developing countries tend to be more operational 6-10 years (Supply extremes and likely as not medium susceptible to significant weather changes – including floods, cost chain) droughts droughts, and sea level rise SC Johnson’s customer base may be adversely impacted in these regions, which could then pose a risk to the company’s expansion strategy in emerging markets.

5.1d

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; and (iii) the costs associated with these actions

B3 Changes in precipitation extremes and droughts (i) SC Johnson is most concerned with the future availability and cost of certain raw material inputs due to adverse weather patterns that could drive up costs as a result of scarcity. Another area of concern is the cost of transportation. Transport costs could increase because of fuel price increases due to scarcity, especially in more remote areas. It is anticipated that the impact of this could be a 20% increase in costs or even higher, especially if the supply of a significant raw material is completely cut off for one reason or another.

(ii) SC Johnson has positioned itself to appropriately adjust to the various physical risks that climate change imposes through a diversified supplier and global manufacturing base. In March of 2009, SC Johnson announced a broad ingredient communication program. This program is a natural extension of the company’s patented Greenlist™ process, which evaluates the potential human health and environmental effects of each ingredient to help its scientists choose the chemicals with lower impacts on the environment and human health while maintaining high performance. Having a thorough understanding of its ingredients not only helps SC Johnson manage human health risks, it also helps the company manage future climate change risk. Fully understanding its inputs allows SC Johnson to assess risks along each ingredient’s supply chain and ensure that the company is sourcing from a geographically diverse supplier base. In addition to evaluating product ingredients, SC Johnson has also diversified its operations around the world, allowing it to maintain business continuity in the face of a regional climate related disruption.

(iii) The costs of SC Johnson’s actions to mitigate precipitation-based risks are minimal at this time. If precipitation extremes and droughts become more widespread in the future, preventing SC Johnson from meeting customer demands, costs associated with moving manufacturing operations and shifting suppliers will be incurred. The costs of these actions cannot be quantified at this time.

5.1e

Please describe your risks that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments

Direct/ Potential Magnitude of ID Risk driver Description Timeframe Indirect Likelihood impact impact

5.1f

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the risk before taking action; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this risk; (iii) the costs associated with these actions

5.1g

Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

5.1h Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

5.1i

Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to risks driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

SC Johnson does not consider itself to be exposed to risks associated with other climate-related developments. The company is already well established as one that is focused on sustainability and one that regularly assesses future climate-related risks. In 2001, SC Johnson transformed how it evaluates ingredients with its patented Greenlist™ process for classifying ingredients considered for use in its products. The goal is that beyond meeting legal and regulatory requirements, SC Johnson use its Greenlist™ process to annually increase the proportion of its ingredients with a lower impact on the environment and human health while maintaining high performance. As public awareness of companies’ impacts on the environment rises, consumers may begin purchasing only environmentally friendly products. In order to be transparent with consumers about what’s in our products, in March of 2009, SC Johnson announced a broad ingredient communication program. Knowing that families today want to understand more about the products they use in their homes, SC Johnson decided to go beyond industry ingredient communication guidelines by disclosing dyes, preservatives and fragrance ingredients. Currently, the program includes approximately 500 products with information available online, on product labels and via a toll-free number in English, Spanish, and French. In 2012, the company moved one step further by disclosing the ingredients used in its fragrances through the release of the SC Johnson Exclusive Fragrance Palette. As a company focused on making better products, using fewer resources, generating less waste and doing the greater good, increasing transparency of the ingredients used in our products through a public awareness and education campaign was a logical step. SC Johnson has also calculated its Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint on an annual basis over the past decade to measure its impact, and in 2009 conducted its first Scope 3 assessment. This continued commitment to measuring and managing its global carbon emissions within the company’s own operations and upstream and downstream will keep SC Johnson ahead of any future climate-related regulations or changes in consumer behaviour related to emissions monitoring and reporting. By remaining proactive, SC Johnson can implement action items that ultimately avoid energy availability/price and other sustainability-related risks in both the short and long terms.

Further Information

A copy of our 2012 Public Sustainability report is attached in support of the holistic approach that the company has adopted to sustainability. This approach has positioned the company well to be able to respond to climate change and to mitigate the impact on operations and business in general.

Attachments https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/50/30450/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/InvestorCDP2013/5.ClimateChangeRisks/2012_SCJohnson_SustainabilityReport[1].pdf

Page: 6. Climate Change Opportunities

6.1

Have you identified any climate change opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure? Tick all that apply

Opportunities driven by changes in regulation Opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments

6.1a

Please describe your opportunities that are driven by changes in regulation

Opportunity Magnitude ID Description Potential impact Timeframe Direct/Indirect Likelihood driver of impact

SC Johnson recognizes that the market is trending towards product labelling regulations and standards. Companies who have already taken steps towards Product participating in these labelling discussions will be well Increased demand labeling C1 positioned to meet future regulations and standards. for existing 1-5 years Direct Very likely Medium regulations and This could result in increased demand for products. SC products/services standards Johnson is a leader in providing information on product labels, especially with respect to ingredients and environmental information. SC Johnson recognizes that emission reporting requirements and obligations are likely to be Emission implemented and continue to increase on a global Indirect C2 reporting basis. Companies that are already collecting and Wider social benefits 1-5 years Likely (Client) obligations reporting data will be better positioned to respond as these regulations evolve. SC Johnson collects and publically reports numerous different data sets relating Opportunity Magnitude ID Description Potential impact Timeframe Direct/Indirect Likelihood driver of impact

to emissions as a result of its operations

6.1b

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions

C1 Product labelling regulations and standards (i) At this point in time, financial information is not available to assess the scale of this opportunity. The green consumer currently makes up a small portion of the market (less than 5% for most product categories), but reports show that upwards of 30% of consumers self report as green consumers. If labelling becomes mandatory and these self-reporting consumers translate into purchasing consumers this could be a significant opportunity for SC Johnson given the company’s commitment to making its products environmentally responsible. In addition, research has shown that consumers have a preference for INCI type nomenclature to determine what is inside a product, and SC Johnson recently announced that it would begin to phase INCI type nomenclature onto its labels over the next several years. (ii) Through Scope 3 reporting and participation in The Sustainability Consortium (TSC) Working Groups for Home Care, external relations, and packaging, SC Johnson actively participates in the dialogue surrounding the development of product labelling standards for its product categories. SC Johnson has identified, measured, tracked, and disclosed its own and the company’s suppliers’ GHG emissions as a potential opportunity under a different regulatory regime. That’s why SC Johnson has been helping to develop, and now test, standards for measuring and reporting GHG emissions across corporate and product supply chains. These initiatives have not only increased SC Johnson’s understanding of where its impacts and future opportunities lie, but they have also put the company at the forefront of reporting and monitoring if this becomes federally mandated in the future. Understanding its emissions and its suppliers’ emissions would position SC Johnson favorably for meeting any future emission reporting standards, product label requirements, and supplier requests. Additionally, participating in the Consumer Goods Forum and TSC allows the company to contribute to the shaping of these future product category standards. (iii) While involvement in these organizations comes at a cost, this cost is minimal in comparison to the potential returns and the information gained through participation. Label changes can be a significant cost but again small in relation to the potential benefits. As a privately held company. SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically. C2 Emission Reporting Obligations (i) It is impossible to accurately estimate the potential financial implications of being well positioned to respond to emission reporting obligations because the impact is impossible to quantify. Having said that it is likely to be large because it connects to the reputation of the company and at a minimum will protect that reputation and maintain the existing customer base. On the up side, there is potential to greatly enhance the reputation of the company and to cause customers at the retail and individual consumer level to switch to SC Johnson products, this increasing sales. (ii) SC Johnson is already managing this opportunity by collecting and reporting emissions data from its worldwide operations. Among the data being reported are GHG emissions, solid waste emissions and water usage, all of which contribute to the reputation of the company as leading in the field of sustainability reporting and emissions reduction. (iii) The costs associated with the reporting of emissions are relatively small compared to the costs incurred with the actual reductions by implementing programs to increase renewable energy usage, reduce energy usage and reduce waste emissions. Costs associated with reporting and third party auditing are currently low but could increase as the obligations increase. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically.

6.1c

Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in physical climate parameters

Opportunity Potential Direct/ Magnitude of ID Description Timeframe Likelihood driver impact Indirect impact

6.1d

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity and (iii) the costs associated with these actions

6.1e

Please describe the opportunities that are driven by changes in other climate-related developments

Opportunity Direct/ Magnitude ID Description Timeframe Likelihood driver Indirect of impact Potential impact

SC Johnson’s past and future success depends on its consumers and customers’ continued belief in its products’ quality and safety. SC Johnson established a generations- Increased demand More likely C3 Reputation long legacy of environmental responsibility, community for existing 6-10 years Direct Medium than not leadership and providing great places to work. The company products/services does this because it wants to do what is right for its business today, and also what is right for people and the planet Opportunity Direct/ Magnitude ID Description Timeframe Likelihood driver Indirect of impact Potential impact

tomorrow. As consumers become more aware of the impacts companies have on the climate, it is expected that consumers and SC Johnson’s customers will begin to incorporate a company’s environmental performance into their purchasing decisions. With the current initiatives it has in place, SC Johnson feels well positioned in light of this increased demand. SC Johnson sees a disconnect in purchasing behavior as more and more consumers self declare as Green Consumers. SC Johnson sees this disconnect as a future Changing opportunity. As consumers become more aware of the Increased demand More likely C4 consumer impacts companies have on the climate, it is expected that for existing 6-10 years Direct Medium than not behaviour consumers will begin to incorporate a company’s products/services environmental performance into their purchasing decisions. With the current initiatives it has in place, SC Johnson feels well positioned in light of this increased demand.

6.1f

Please describe (i) the potential financial implications of the opportunity; (ii) the methods you are using to manage this opportunity; (iii) the costs associated with these actions

C3. Reputation (i) The opportunities associated with the company’s reputation as a sustainability-focused company have not been quantified. However, if an improved reputation based on SC Johnson’s efforts to address climate change leads to increases in demand for its goods, this will be accompanied by the respective revenue increases, which could be significant. (ii) SC Johnson has calculated its Scope 1 and 2 carbon footprint on an annual basis over the past decade to measure its impact, and in 2009 conducted its first Scope 3 assessment. This continued commitment to measuring and managing the company’s global carbon emissions within its own operations and upstream and downstream will continue to strengthen SC Johnson’s reputation as a sustainably-focused company. SC Johnson also continues to be a leader in product sustainability through the continued use of its patented Greenlist™ process that leads to the selection of materials which have a lower impact on the environment and human health. In March of 2009, SC Johnson announced a broad ingredient communication program. This program is a natural extension of its Greenlist™ process, which evaluates the potential human health and environmental effects of each ingredient to help the company’s scientists choose chemicals with lower impacts on the environment and human health. Having a thorough understanding of its ingredients not only helps SC Johnson manage human health risks, it also helps the company manage future climate change risk. Fully understanding its inputs and their associated impacts allows SC Johnson to assess risks along each ingredient’s supply chain to ensure that the company is sourcing from a geographically diverse supplier base. (iii) While continued support for these programs comes at a cost, this cost is estimated to be less relatively low for the company and we believe these programs are the right thing to do as a sustainability-minded company. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically. C4 Changing Consumer Behavior (i) As consumers become more aware of, and concerned with, the impacts of climate change we anticipate that they will look to buy from companies which are viewed as more environmentally responsible. At a minimum this will help protect existing business volume but it is also likely to result in increased sales for companies such as SC Johnson who have consistently demonstrated a sustainable approach to business. In either scenario, the impact is likely to be significant (ii) SC Johnson has a heritage of environmental stewardship going back several decades. This has placed the company in a strong position in the minds of customers and consumers. We will continue to follow our corporate ethos of "doing what is right" , for future generations and the reputation of the company will be maintained. (iii) These actions require considerable investment by SC Johnson, in multiple areas, including consumer reserach, product development and innovation, staffing, advertising and public affairs. This has been, and continues to be, significant investment for the company. As a privately held company, SC Johnson does not share this kind of financial information publically.

6.1g

Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in regulation that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

6.1h

Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by physical climate parameters that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

SC Johnson does not anticipate significant physical opportunities to emerge for the company from climate change in the short or long term. SC Johnson has evaluated potential opportunities on a global scale and has concluded that these opportunities, if present, will not be unique to SC Johnson and therefore will not result in substantive change.

6.1i Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to opportunities driven by changes in other climate-related developments that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operations, revenue or expenditure

Module: GHG Emissions Accounting, Energy and Fuel Use, and Trading [Investor]

Page: 7. Emissions Methodology

7.1

Please provide your base year and base year emissions (Scopes 1 and 2)

Scope 1 Base year Scope 2 Base Base year emissions (metric tonnes year emissions (metric CO2e) tonnes CO2e)

Sat 01 Jan 2000 - Sun 31 Dec 2000 100217 195052

Fri 01 Jan 2010 - Fri 31 Dec 2010 89041 139616

7.2

Please give the name of the standard, protocol or methodology you have used to collect activity data and calculate Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions

Please select the published methodologies that you use

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (Revised Edition)

7.2a

If you have selected "Other", please provide details below

7.3

Please give the source for the global warming potentials you have used

Gas Reference

CO2 IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year) N2O IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year) CH4 IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year) HFCs IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR - 100 year)

7.4

Please give the emissions factors you have applied and their origin; alternatively, please attach an Excel spreadsheet with this data

Fuel/Material/Energy Emission Factor Unit Reference

Natural gas 117 lb CO2e per million BTU WE Energies

Further Information

Natural gas combustion uses an emission factor including CO2, N20 and CH4

Page: 8. Emissions Data - (1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012)

8.1

Please select the boundary you are using for your Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas inventory

Operational control

8.2

Please provide your gross global Scope 1 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e

80489

8.3

Please provide your gross global Scope 2 emissions figures in metric tonnes CO2e

130628

8.4

Are there are any sources (e.g. facilities, specific GHGs, activities, geographies, etc.) of Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions which are not included in your disclosure?

8.4a Please complete the table

Source Scope Explain why the source is excluded

8.5

Please estimate the level of uncertainty of the total gross global Scope 1 and 2 emissions figures that you have supplied and specify the sources of uncertainty in your data gathering, handling and calculations

Scope 1 Scope 1 emissions: Scope 2 emissions: Scope 1 emissions: emissions: Main Please expand on Scope 2 emissions: Please expand Scope 2 emissions: Main sources of Uncertainty range sources of the uncertainty in on the uncertainty in your data Uncertainty range uncertainty uncertainty your data

Metering/ Various, but considered immaterial More than 2% but less Data Gaps Unreported fuel use More than 2% but less Measurement where metering and billing than or equal to 5% at various sites. than or equal to 5% Constraints discrepancy occurs

8.6

Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 1 emissions

Third party verification or assurance complete

8.6a

Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 1 emissions that are verified/assured

More than 60% but less than or equal to 80%

8.6b

Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements

Type of verification or Relevant Attach the document assurance standard

https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/50/30450/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor- High assurance ISO14064-3 8.6b-C3-RelevantStatement/SCJ's_2012_GHG_Verification_Final_Report.pdf

8.6c

Please provide further details of the regulatory regime to which you are complying that specifies the use of Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS)

Regulation Compliance period Evidence of submission % of emissions covered by the system

8.7

Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 2 emissions

Third party verification or assurance complete

8.7a

Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 2 emissions that are verified/assured

More than 60% but less than or equal to 80%

8.7b

Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements

Type of verification or Relevant Attach the document assurance standard

https://www.cdproject.net/sites/2013/50/30450/Investor CDP 2013/Shared Documents/Attachments/Investor- High assurance ISO14064-3 8.7b-C3-RelevantStatement/SCJ's_2012_GHG_Verification_Final_Report.pdf

8.8

Are carbon dioxide emissions from biologically sequestered carbon relevant to your organization?

8.8a

Please provide the emissions in metric tonnes CO2

Further Information

Only US facilities were audited and verified by external consultant.

Page: 9. Scope 1 Emissions Breakdown - (1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012)

9.1

Do you have Scope 1 emissions sources in more than one country?

Yes

9.1a

Please complete the table below

Country/Region Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e

Argentina 2297 Australia 95 Austria 224 Colombia 0 Belarus 19 Belgium 175 Bosnia and Herzegovina 7 Brazil 753 Bulgaria 26 Canada 3164 China 7485 Costa Rica 10 Croatia 17 Czech Republic 115 Ecuador 10 Egypt 381 France 847 Germany 645 Ghana 163 Country/Region Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e

Greece 131 Hong Kong 0 Hungary 137 India 99 Indonesia 5790 Israel 3 Italy 150 Japan 321 Kazakhstan 0 South Korea 340 Kenya 330 Malaysia 21 Mexico 2185 Morocco 11 Netherlands 3963 New Zealand 112 Nigeria 1032 Pakistan 96 Peru 5 Philippines 230 Poland 1907 Portugal 76 Puerto Rico 293 Romania 51 Russia 371 Saudi Arabia 24 Serbia 16 Singapore 80 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 6 South Africa 1025 Spain 210 Sweden 75 Country/Region Scope 1 metric tonnes CO2e

Switzerland 46 Taiwan 4 Thailand 369 Turkey 351 Ukraine 1232 United Arab Emirates 34 United Kingdom 778 United States of America 40460 Uruguay 31 Venezuela 828 Vietnam 756 Paraguay 0 Cyprus 8 Albania 6

9.2

Please indicate which other Scope 1 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply)

9.2a

Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by business division

Business division Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

9.2b Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by facility

Facility Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Latitude Longitude

9.2c

Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by GHG type

GHG type Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

9.2d

Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by activity

Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e) Activity

9.2e

Please break down your total gross global Scope 1 emissions by legal structure

Legal structure Scope 1 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

Page: 10. Scope 2 Emissions Breakdown - (1 Jan 2012 - 31 Dec 2012) 10.1

Do you have Scope 2 emissions sources in more than one country?

Yes

10.1a

Please complete the table below

Country/Region Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e Purchased and consumed electricity, Purchased and consumed low carbon heat, steam or cooling (MWh) electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)

Argentina 1335

Australia 851

Austria 10

Albania 0

Belarus 0

Belgium 10

Bosnia and Herzegovina 8

Brazil 539

Bulgaria 21

Canada 2440

Chile 29

China 14927

Colombia 9

Costa Rica 2

Croatia 1

Cyprus 39

Czech Republic 12

Ecuador 16

Egypt 552

France 113

Germany 0

Country/Region Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e Purchased and consumed electricity, Purchased and consumed low carbon heat, steam or cooling (MWh) electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)

Ghana 7

Greece 147

Hong Kong 14

Hungary 7

India 1050

Indonesia 13347

Israel 11

Italy 316

Japan 163

Kazakhstan 5

Kenya 149

South Korea 55

Malaysia 632

Mexico 4023

Morocco 4

Netherlands 1834

New Zealand 26

Nigeria 64

Pakistan 39

Paraguay 0

Peru 1

Philippines 624

Poland 1447

Portugal 24

Puerto Rico 0

Romania 15

Russia 35

Saudi Arabia 1219

Serbia 8

Singapore 4

Slovakia 3

Slovenia 2

South Africa 3590

Country/Region Scope 2 metric tonnes CO2e Purchased and consumed electricity, Purchased and consumed low carbon heat, steam or cooling (MWh) electricity, heat, steam or cooling (MWh)

Spain 30

Sweden 3

Switzerland 2

Taiwan 52

Thailand 247

Turkey 29

Ukraine 1297

United Arab Emirates 0

United Kingdom 0

United States of America 78156

Uruguay 5

Venezuela 439

Vietnam 558

10.2

Please indicate which other Scope 2 emissions breakdowns you are able to provide (tick all that apply)

10.2a

Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by business division

Business division Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

10.2b Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by facility

Facility Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

10.2c

Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by activity

Activity Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

10.2d

Please break down your total gross global Scope 2 emissions by legal structure

Legal structure Scope 2 emissions (metric tonnes CO2e)

Page: 11. Energy

11.1

What percentage of your total operational spend in the reporting year was on energy?

More than 0% but less than or equal to 5%

11.2 Please state how much fuel, electricity, heat, steam, and cooling in MWh your organization has purchased and consumed during the reporting year

Energy type MWh

Fuel 574187 Electricity 252336 Heat

Steam 2968 Cooling

11.3

Please complete the table by breaking down the total "Fuel" figure entered above by fuel type

Fuels MWh

Natural gas 299712 Distillate fuel oil No 2 4538 Diesel/Gas oil 57189 Kerosene 12171 Motor gasoline 22708 Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) 9072 Biogas 118019 Other: Agricultural waste husks 47809

11.4

Please provide details of the electricity, heat, steam or cooling amounts that were accounted at a low carbon emission factor

Basis for applying a low carbon MWh associated with low carbon electricity, Comments emission factor heat, steam or cooling

Page: 12. Emissions Performance

12.1

How do your absolute emissions (Scope 1 and 2 combined) for the reporting year compare to the previous year?

Decreased

12.1a

Please complete the table

Reason Emissions value (percentage) Direction of change Comment

Emissions reduction activities 6.4 Decrease Sourcing more renewable forms of energy Closed manufacturing plants in US, Australia, and Divestment 2 Decrease UK Acquired manufacturing plants in Europe, Africa, Acquisitions 3 Increase and Malaysia Mergers

Change in output

Change in methodology

Change in boundary

Change in physical operating conditions

Unidentified

Other

12.2 Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per unit currency total revenue

% change Direction of Intensity Metric Metric from change from Reason for change figure numerator denominator previous previous year year

Due to confidentiality of financial data, $9 billion is used as an estimate for metric tonnes unit total 2012 intensity measurements. Therefore, these intensity calculations may not .0000234 17 Decrease CO2e revenue accurately reflect SC Johnson’s change in emissions intensity based on revenue.

12.3

Please describe your gross combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions for the reporting year in metric tonnes CO2e per full time equivalent (FTE) employee

Direction of Metric Metric % change from Intensity figure change from Reason for change numerator denominator previous year previous year

metric tonnes FTE is calculated using SC Johnson’s regular employees 16.2 FTE employee 13 Decrease CO2e and does not include part-time labor

12.4

Please provide an additional intensity (normalized) metric that is appropriate to your business operations

% change from Direction of change Intensity figure Metric numerator Metric denominator Reason for change previous year from previous year

Page: 13. Emissions Trading

13.1

Do you participate in any emissions trading schemes?

No, and we do not currently anticipate doing so in the next 2 years

13.1a

Please complete the following table for each of the emission trading schemes in which you participate

Period for which Verified emissions in Scheme name Allowances allocated Allowances purchased Details of ownership data is supplied metric tonnes CO2e

13.1b

What is your strategy for complying with the schemes in which you participate or anticipate participating?

13.2

Has your company originated any project-based carbon credits or purchased any within the reporting period?

13.2a

Please complete the table

Credit Number of Number of credits origination Project Project Verified to which credits (metric (metric tonnes Credits Purpose, e.g. or credit type identification standard tonnes of CO2e): Risk adjusted retired compliance purchase CO2e) volume

Page: 14. Scope 3 Emissions

14.1

Please account for your organization’s Scope 3 emissions, disclosing and explaining any exclusions

Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data

All raw material and component purchases are classified based on their material type into 60 categories and converted from their purchasing weight to kilograms. EcoInvent is used to select emissions factors based on the extraction, transportation and production of the material category. For each material category, emissions factors from the Top 1, 2 or 3 materials by weight within that category are determined. For the raw material category, these emissions factors are applied Purchased goods Relevant, individually to those specific materials, and then averaged 934119 100% and services calculated together to come up with an estimated factor for the remaining materials within that category. For the component category, emission factors for all material types reported are determined. For material types that are not properly classified (i.e. reported as N/A, 0, or mixed composition), average representative emissions factors based on the top 1 or 2 materials by weight within that category are applied to the data gaps. These factors are then multiplied by the purchased amount to calculate total emissions. Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data

The size and level of risk associated with this category Not relevant, are small in comparison to Capital goods explanation Not Applicable SCJ’s overall scope 3

provided emissions; therefore, this category has not been calculated. This category contributes less Fuel-and-energy- than 5% to the overall Not relevant, related activities emissions and the level of explanation Not Applicable (not included in influence is limited; therefore, provided Scope 1 or 2) this category has not been calculated. For the purposes of its scope 3 Inventory, upstream transportation and distribution is being defined as all transport legs up until the finished products leave SCJ distribution centers. All North America and Europe transport emissions are calculated by multiplying shipment ton-mile data by a Climate Leaders emissions factor specific to the mode of transportation. Ton-miles are calculated by converting shipment weights in pounds or kilograms to U.S. tons, and then multiplying this by the shipments' mileage. SAP Countries. For inbound Upstream purchases, all shipments from countries other than the U.S., Relevant, transportation and 193573 Canada, and Mexico that were not indicated to arrive by rail is 85% calculated distribution assumed to be transported by boat. All U.S., Canada and Mexico shipments that were not indicated to arrive by rail is assumed to be by truck. Non-SAP Regions. The remaining regions in which SCJ operates are estimated using North America and Europe data. Upstream intensity factors are calculated using the North America and Europe emissions and dividing them by the number of cases shipped. This CO2e intensity factor is then multiplied by the number of cases shipped in Asia Pacific, the Americas, and AFNE to estimate upstream emissions. Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data

Non-hazardous waste. 2010 waste category breakdowns were used to determine the average composition of manufacturing waste by material type and region, assuming the manufacturing waste. Emission factors for the landfilling of these wastes from EcoInvent are selected based on the various material groups and averaged based on their contribution to the waste's overall composition. This weighted average region-specific emission factor is multiplied by each plant's non-hazardous waste to determine the plant emissions from non-hazardous waste. Hazardous Waste. A hazardous waste emission factor, using the assumption that all hazardous waste is incinerated, is taken from EcoInvent and multiplied by each plant's hazardous waste to quantify emissions. Mixed Recycled Content. Each plant provides data about the amount of materials they recycle. A historical study conducted by the Waxdale facility determined the average composition of its recycled material. This material composition is assumed to be the same for all SCJ facilities' Waste generated in Relevant, 4909 recycled materials. Emissions factors from EcoInvent are 100% operations calculated selected and averaged based on the various material groups that contributed to the waste's overall composition. Wastewater. Each location's specific COD content in sludge is used to determine its respective emissions factor. The only major source of emissions resulting from industrial wastewater is in the form of methane. For each site, the quantity of methane resulting from the treatment of wastewater (whether treated onsite or offsite) is calculated using IPCC’s 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The IPCC guidelines dictate that the product of the total quantity of COD discharged and the amount treated anaerobically applying a default value for the maximum CH4 producing capacity results in the total amount of methane produced. Methane recovery is assumed to be zero for all calculations. Transport of Waste. Waste is transported from SCJ facilities to landfill, incinerator, or recycling center by an outside hauling company. To calculate emissions, the weight of non-hazardous Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data

waste, hazardous waste, sludge, and mixed recycled content is added together and multiplied by a ton-mile truck emissions factor. The average distance to landfill is assumed to be 15 miles based on the distance from the Waxdale plant to the nearest landfill in Wisconsin. North America emissions sources are calculated for: automobile rentals based on fuel purchases; personal automobile travel based on vehicle-miles reimbursed; and air travel by passenger-mile determined by haul distance. Rental car fuel purchases are given in spend; the purchased fuel quantity is estimated using average annual retail prices provided by EIA and Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) for fuels purchased in the U.S. and Canada, respectively. For personal vehicle reimbursement, SCJ follows rates set by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and Canada Revenue Agency. Therefore, the spend reported is divided by these factors to calculate total mileage traveled. For air travel, total miles flown between cities is provided, which is converted to average miles Relevant, per segment, and flight segments are designated short-haul, Business travel 6252 45% calculated medium-haul, and long-haul to apply the appropriate emissions factors. Emissions factors for motor gasoline, vehicle-miles, and miles-flown from EPA Climate Leaders are used to calculate emissions for all business travel. Business travel outside of North America is estimated using expenditure dollars multiplied by a kg CO2e per USD factor based on the North American emissions intensity. A travel-to-total T&E ratio is calculated using travel cost data provided for North America compared to the North American global T&E spend. The global T&E spend is taken from SAP and represents the total spent on both transportation and entertainment. The ratio of transportation-to-entertainment is applied to each country’s global T&E spend to estimate business travel expenditures and emissions for countries outside of North America. Employee Not relevant, Not Applicable The size and level of risk

Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data commuting explanation associated with this category provided are small in comparison to SCJ’s overall scope 3 emissions; therefore, this category has not been calculated. Not relevant, SCJ does not own any Upstream leased explanation Not Applicable upstream leased assets making assets provided this category not applicable. SCJ does not own any Not relevant, investments that are not Investments explanation Not Applicable included in one of the other

provided categories making this category not applicable For the purposes of its scope 3 Inventory, downstream transportation and distribution is being defined as the delivery of finished products to customers from SCJ distribution centers. All North America and Europe transport emissions are calculated by multiplying shipment ton-mile data by a Climate Leaders emissions factor specific to the mode of transportation, which includes truck, rail, boat, and air. Ton-miles are calculated by converting shipment weights in pounds or Downstream kilograms to U.S. tons, and then multiplying this by the Relevant, transportation and 262812 shipments' mileage. Outbound shipment routes indicated as 60% calculated distribution intermodal are split out between rail and road transport. All other U.S. and Canada shipments to North America destinations are assumed to be via road transport. Distances are provided by SCJ and calculated using a combination of PC*MILER and Google Maps. Customer pickup transport is assumed to be by truck. Distances are calculated using a combination of PC*MILER and Google Maps. Customer postal codes are assumed to be the delivery location of the customer's distribution center. Processing of sold Not relevant, Not Applicable SCJ products do not require

Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data products explanation further processing making this provided category not relevant. Plug-In. Using an internal consumer behavior analysis, electricity amounts are generated per product type for each geographic region based on refill volumes, average device wattage (5% less than UL wattage), refill duration (in hours), and assumptions on plug-in time beyond refill expiration and market segmentation. These electricity amounts are multiplied by a region-specific emissions factor from the Carbon Monitoring for Action (CARMA) database to calculate plug-in emissions. Battery. Refill sales are used to estimate battery requirements for annual battery-operated device usage. Use of sold Relevant, 494416 Cradle-to-grave emissions factor for AA and 9V batteries are 80% products calculated collected from literature and multiplied by battery quantities to calculate emissions. Coils. Burning coils is assumed to emit similar emissions as would be created by incinerating untreated wood at an incinerator. An EcoInvent emissions factor is selected and multiplied by total coil weight to calculate coil emissions. Candles. Candle emissions are created from the burning of wax. Emissions factors are developed by Deloitte practitioners that take into consideration the primary wax ingredients and multiplied by total wax purchasing amounts in kilograms to calculate candle emissions. Component data from SAP is used to determine end-of-life volumes. All components are assumed to be disposed of in the region shipped. SCJ estimates the percentage of waste that is recycled per material category and region, which is applied to End of life the total waste generated in each region. The remainder of the Relevant, treatment of sold 38008 components are assumed to be either incinerated or landfilled. 80% calculated products Using various reports from the U.S., European Union, and ASEAN, estimates are made for the amount of remaining waste that is disposed of to landfill and incinerator. For regions where waste disposal reports are unavailable, they are assumed to have the same behavior as North America. The Percentage of metric Sources of Scope emissions tonnes Methodology 3 emissions Evaluation calculated CO2e Explanation status using

primary

data

end-of-life calculations utilize the component weight data and emission factors from the EcoInvent database for the final emission calculations. Emissions factors for recycling, incineration, and landfill are selected based on the most representative materials within the EcoInvent database for each material category. Each category is multiplied by its respective emissions factor to calculate emissions by region for recycling, incineration, and landfilling. Transportation of waste to recycling facility, incinerator, or landfill is also included in these calculations. Waste is transported from consumer homes to landfill, incinerator, or recycling center by an outside hauling company. To calculate emissions, the waste weight is multiplied by a ton-mile truck emissions factor. The average distance to landfill is estimated to be 15 miles based on the distance from the Waxdale plant to the nearest landfill in Wisconsin. SCJ does not own any Not relevant, Downstream leased downstream leased assets explanation Not Applicable assets making this category not provided applicable. Not relevant, SCJ does not own any Franchises explanation Not Applicable franchises making this category

provided not applicable. Other (upstream)

Other (downstream)

14.2

Please indicate the verification/assurance status that applies to your Scope 3 emissions

Third party verification or assurance complete

14.2a

Please indicate the proportion of your Scope 3 emissions that are verified/assured

More than 60% but less than or equal to 80%

14.2b

Please provide further details of the verification/assurance undertaken, and attach the relevant statements

Type of verification or assurance Relevant standard Attach the document

Moderate assurance

14.3

Are you able to compare your Scope 3 emissions for the reporting year with those for the previous year for any sources?

Yes

14.3a

Please complete the table

Sources of Scope 3 Emissions value Direction of Reason for change Comment emissions (percentage) change

Increased procurement of materials due to increased Purchased goods & services Change in output 12 Increase demand/output Upstream transportation & Increased transportation usage due to increased procurement Change in output 27 Increase distribution of materials Waste generated in reduction in recycled waste for which an emission credit is Change in output 39 Increase operations given and increase in waste to incineration Emissions reduction Business travel 60 Decrease Reduction in travel and decrease in miles travelled activities Downstream transportation Emissions reduction Ton - miles to distribution centers reduced by management of 8 Decrease and distribution activities shipments Other: Data Difficulty obtaining accurate sales data outside of US and Use of sold products 22 Decrease Collection Issues Europe End-of-life treatment of sold Change in Changes in conversion of SAP data to products and 2 Decrease products methodology components and update of recycling emissions factors

14.4

Do you engage with any of the elements of your value chain on GHG emissions and climate change strategies? (Tick all that apply)

Yes, other partners in the value chain

14.4a

Please give details of methods of engagement, your strategy for prioritizing engagements and measures of success

Encourage other value chain partners to join CDP and complete the Supply Chain reporting. Dialogue with suppliers on how to improve their emissions profile. Success measured by CDP reporting of results.

14.4b

To give a sense of scale of this engagement, please give the number of suppliers with whom you are engaging and the proportion of your total spend that they represent

Number of suppliers Comment % of total spend

14.4c

If you have data on your suppliers’ GHG emissions and climate change strategies, please explain how you make use of that data How you make use of the data Please give details

14.4d

Please explain why not and any plans you have to develop an engagement strategy in the future

Module: Water-Governance

Page: Water-1-ManagementGovernance

1.1

Does your company have a water policy, strategy or management plan?

1.1a Please describe your policy, strategy or plan, including the highest level of responsibility for it within your company and its geographical reach.

Country or region Description of policy, strategy or plan Position of responsible person

1.1b

Does the water policy, strategy or plan specify water-related targets or goals?

1.1c

Please describe these water-related targets or goals and the progress your company has made against them.

Category of target or Description of target Progress against Country or region goal type or goal target or goal

1.1d

You may explain here why your company does not have a water policy, strategy or plan and if you intend to put one in place.

1.2

Do you wish to report any actions outside your water policy, strategy or management plan that your company has taken to manage water resources or engage stakeholders in water-related issues?

Category of action Description of action and outcome Country or region

Module: Water-RisksOpps

Page: Water-2-indicators-op

2.1

Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions?

2.1a

Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions (you may choose more than one method).

Method used to define water stress Please add any comments here:

2.1b

Please list the water-stressed regions where you have operations and the proportion of your total operations in that area.

Country or region Proportion of operations located River basin Further comments in this region (%)

2.1a Please specify the method(s) you use to characterize water-stressed regions.

Method used to define water stress Please add any comments here:

2.1c

You may explain here why you are not able to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water stress and whether you have plans to investigate this in the future.

2.2

Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk?

2.2

Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report that help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk?

2.2

Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report which help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk?

2.2a Please list the regions at risk where you have operations, the relevant risk indicator and proportion of your total operations in that area.

Proportion of Country or region Risk Indicator operations located in River basin Further comments this region (%)

2.2a

Please list the regions at risk where you have operations, the relevant risk indicator and proportion of your total operations in that area.

Proportion of Country or region Risk Indicator operations located in River basin Further comments this region (%)

2.2a

Please list the regions at risk where you have operations, the relevant risk indicator and proportion of your total operations in that area.

Proportion of Country or region Risk Indicator operations located in River basin Further comments this region (%)

2.2b

You may explain here why you do not wish to report or why you do not use other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk.

2.2b

You may explain here why you do not use or wish to report other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water- related risk.

2.2b

You may explain here why you do not use or wish to report other indicators to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water- related risk.

2.3

Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2.

2.3

Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and/or 2.2.

2.3

Please specify the total proportion of your operations that are located in the regions at risk which you identified in questions 2.1 and /or 2.2.

2.4

Please specify the basis you use to calculate the proportions used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2.

Basis used to determine proportions Please add any comments here

2.4

Please specify the basis you use to calculate the proportions used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2.

Basis used to determine proportions Please add any comments here

2.4

Please specify the basis you use to calculate the proportions used for questions 2.1 and/or 2.2

Basis used to determine proportions Please add any comments here

Page: water-indicators-sc

2.5

Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk?

2.5a

Please state or estimate the proportion of your key inputs or raw materials that come from regions subject to water-related risk.

Proportion of key input or Unit used for Country or region Input or material raw material that comes Further comments River basin calculating from region at risk (%) percentage

2.5b

You may explain here why you are not able to identify if any of your key inputs or raw materials come from regions subject to water-related risk and whether you have plans to explore this issue in the future.

Page: water-3-riskassess-op

3.1

Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure?

3.1a

Please describe (i) the current and/or future risks to your operations, (ii) the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations before taking action, (iii) the estimated timescale of these risks, and (iv) your current or proposed strategies for managing them.

Potential Estimated Risk management Country or region River basin Risk type business impact timescale (years) strategies

3.1b Please explain why you do not consider your company to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure.

3.1c

Please explain why you do not know if your company is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and if you have plans to assess this risk in the future.

3.2

What methodology and what geographical scale (e.g. country, region, watershed, business unit, facility) do you use to analyze water-related risk across your operations?

Country or geographical scale Risk methodology

Page: water-riskassess-sc

3.3

Do you require your key suppliers to report on their water use, risks and management?

3.4

Is your supply chain exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure?

3.4a

Please describe (i) the current and/or future risks to your supply chain, (ii) the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations before taking action, (iii) the estimated timescale of these risks and, (iv) your current or proposed strategies for managing them.

Potential business Risk management Country or region impact (to responding Estimate timescale (years) strategies (by River basin Risk type (to supplier) company) responding company)

3.4b

Please explain why you do not consider your supply chain to be exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure.

3.4c

Please explain why you do not know if your supply chain is exposed to any water-related risks that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure, and if you have plans to assess this risk in the future.

Page: Water-4-Impacts

4.1 Has your business experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years?

4.1a

Please describe these detrimental impacts including (i) their financial impacts and (ii) whether they have resulted in any changes to company practices.

Country Impact indicator Description of impact Response strategy

4.1b

Please explain why you do not know whether your business has experienced any detrimental impacts related to water in the past five years and if you have any plans to explore this in the future?

Page: Water-5-Opportunities

5.1

Do water-related issues present opportunities (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure?

5.1a

Please describe (i) the current and/or future opportunities, (ii) the ways in which these opportunities affect or could affect your operations (iii) the estimated timescale and (iv) your current or proposed strategies for exploiting them.

Potential Country or region Opportunity type Estimated timescale Strategy to exploit business impact opportunity

5.1b

Please explain why you do not consider water-related issues to present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure or supply chain.

5.1c

Please explain why you do not know whether water-related issues present opportunities to your company that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure.

Page: Water-6-tradeoffs

6.1

Has your company identified any linkages or trade-offs between water and carbon emissions in its operations or supply chain?

6.1a

Please describe the linkages or trade-offs and the related management policy or action.

Linkage or trade-off Policy or action

Module: Water-Accounting

Page: Water-7-Withdrawals

7.1

Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water withdrawals within your operations?

7.1a

Please report the water withdrawals within your operations for the reporting year.

Proportion of data that has Country or region Withdrawal type Quantity (megaliters/year) River basin been verified (%) Comments

7.1b

Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water withdrawals.

7.2

Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations?

7.2

Are you able to provide data, whether measured or estimated, on water recycling/reuse within your operations?

7.2a

Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year.

Proportion of data that has Country or region Quantity (megaliters/year) River basin been verified (%) Comments

7.2a

Please report the water recycling/reuse within your operations for the reporting year.

Proportion of data that has Country or region Quantity (megaliters/year) River basin been verified (%) Comments

7.2b

Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations.

7.2b

Please explain why you are not able to provide data for water recycling/reuse within your operations.

7.3

Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above.

7.3

Please use this space to describe the methodologies used for questions 7.1 and 7.2 or to report withdrawals or recycling/reuse in a different format to that set out above.

7.4

Are any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water?

7.4a

Please list any water sources significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water.

Country or geographical reach River basin Water source Impact Company action and outcomes

7.4b You may explain here why your company's withrawal of water does not significantly affect any water sources.

7.4c

Please explain why you do not know if any water sources are significantly affected by your company's withdrawal of water.

Page: Water-8-Discharges

8.1

Are you able to identify discharges of water from your operations by destination, by treatment method and by quantity and quality using standard effluent parameters?

8.1a

Please explain why you are not able to identify discharges from your operations by destination, treatment method , quantity and quality, and whether you have any plans to put in place systems that would enable you to do so.

8.2

Did your company pay any penalties or fines for significant breaches of discharge agreements or regulations in the reporting period?

8.2a Please describe the location and impact of the discharge that was the subject of the significant breach(es), the associated fines and any actions taken to minimise the risk of future non-compliance.

Country or region Impact Fines and penalties Company action and outcomes River basin

8.3

Are any water bodies and related habitats significantly affected by discharges of water or runoff from your operations?

8.3a

Please list any water bodies and associated habitats which are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations.

Country or region River basin Water body Impact Company action and outcomes

8.3b

You may explain here why your company's discharge of water does not significantly affect any water bodies or associated habitats.

8.3c

Please explain why you do not know if any water bodies and associated habitats are significantly affected by discharge of water or runoff from your operations.

Page: Water-9-Intensity

9.1

Please provide any available financial intensity values for your company's water use across its operations.

Please provide any contextual details that Financial intensity you consider relevant to Country or region Water use type (megaliters) (Currency/mega- River basin Financial metric Currency understand the units or liter) figures you have

provided.

9.2

Please provide any available water intensity values for your company's products or services across its operations.

Please provide any Water intensity contextual details that Country or region Water unit (Water unit/product Water use type River basin Product Product unit you consider relevant to unit) understand the units or

figures you have

provided.

Module: SupplyChain

Page: SM0. Supply Chain Module - Introduction

SM0.0 Please take this opportunity, if you would like to do so, to provide a separate introduction to this module

SC Johnson is a family-owned and managed business dedicated to innovative, high-quality products, excellence in the workplace and a long-term commitment to the environment and the communities in which it operates. Based in the USA, the company is one of the world's leading manufacturers of household cleaning products and products for home storage, air care, pest control and shoe care. It markets such well-known brands as GLADE®, KIWI®, OFF!®, PLEDGE®, RAID®, SCRUBBING BUBBLES®, SHOUT®, WINDEX® and ZIPLOC® in the U.S. and beyond, with brands marketed outside the U.S. including AUTAN®, TANA®, BAMA®, BAYGON®, BRISE®, KABIKILLER®, KLEAR®, MR. MUSCLE®, and RIDSECT®. The 126-year-old company, that generates $9 billion in sales, employs nearly 13,000 people globally and sells products in virtually every country around the world. www.scjohnson.com

Page: SM1. Supply Chain - Allocation

SM1.1

Please allocate your emissions to your customers listed below according to the goods or services you have sold them in this reporting period

Please note that this table ( for SM1.1) is designed so that only the customer that you select in column 1 ("Please select the requesting member(s)") will be able to see the data relevant to them. If you enter an answer without selecting a requesting member, your answer will not be viewable at all.

Please select Uncertainty (+/- the requesting Scope of Emissions in Major sources Verified Please give details %) member(s) emissions metric of emissions

tonnes CO2e

Wal-Mart Stores, Fuel, disposal, and energy Allocation based on the market value Scope 1+2 33300 10 No Inc. consumption of products purchased

SM1.2

Please explain how you have identified the GHG sources listed above, including major limitations to this process and assumptions made

In 2010, SCJ participated in the preliminary road testing process for the GHG Protocol Initiative’s Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (Scope 3 Standard) – a supplement to the GHG Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol). The GHG Protocol Initiative is a global collaboration of businesses, governments, and non-governmental organizations, convened by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), to develop credible methods for measuring and reporting corporate GHG emissions. SCJ has been conducting its scope 1 and 2 emissions inventory since 2000, and for calendar year 2010, chose to include scope 3 emissions as part of its corporate footprint assessment as well. The expanded boundaries of this footprint has allowed SCJ to not only understand the direct impact of its own facilities and offices, but also the carbon, energy, and cost impacts throughout its value chain. The Scope 3 Standard provides a standardized method for measuring the GHG emissions associated with corporate value chains, taking into account impacts both upstream and downstream of the company’s operations. SCJ feels that the Scope 3 Standard is a critical tool in assessing the overall environmental impact of its operations. In 2013, Deloitte was commissioned to act as mentors during the 2012 scope 3 GHG inventory process with the goal of transferring knowledge on the scope 3 inventory calculation procedures to SCJ’s internal team.

SM1.3

Where published information has been used in completing SM1.1, please provide a reference(s)

S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., 2012 Scope 3 GHG Inventory Methodology as prepared by Deloitte. Publication only available within this report as an attachment in Section 12 of the Investor's Responce

SM1.4a

What are the challenges in allocating emissions to different customers and what would help you to overcome these challenges Allocation challenges Please explain what would help you overcome challenges Doing so would require we disclose business sensitive / proprietary Making efforts to conservatively allocate emissions to our largest customers using information reasonable assumptions.

SM1.4b

Please describe whether and how you plan to develop your capabilities to allocate emissions to your customers in the future Create a more robust internal GHG accounting system to more accurately track Scope 1, 2 & 3 emissions and how they correspond to our customers.

Page: SM2. Supply Chain - Collaboration SM2.1

Please use the table below to communicate any proposals you would like to make to specific Supply Chain members for the collaborative development of GHG emission reducing projects or products

Please do NOT include details of existing commercial offerings of which your customer will already be aware. Use this as an opportunity to think about how you can work with your customer to reduce the emissions associated with the goods and services you provide to your customer.

Please note that this table (for SM2.1) is designed so that only the customer that you select in column 1 ("Please select requesting member") will be able to see the data relevant to them. If you enter an answer without selecting a requesting member, your answer will not be viewable at all.

Please select requesting Details of proposal Type of member proposal

Process SC Johnson has discussed GHG emissions reductions with Walmart’s sustainability team through engagement with Wal-Mart Stores, emissions The Sustainability Consortium. SC Johnson attends Walmart’s sustainability meeting in Bentonville and discussed Inc. reductions reporting and tracking of sustainability metrics, including carbon emissions.

SM2.2a

Have requests or initiatives by CDP Supply Chain members prompted your company to take organizational-level emission reduction initiatives No

SM2.2b

Please select the requesting member(s) that have driven a reduction Please select the requesting member(s) that Give reduction for the reporting year in Describe the reduction initative have driven a reduction metric tonnes of CO2e

Further Information SC Johnson already has a very large and comrehensive program of emission reduction initiatives. Supply chain members have not identified any additional, viable opportunities

Page: SM3. Supply Chain - Product level data

SM3.1

For how many goods/services do you wish to provide data?

SM3.1a

Please give the overall percentage of total emissions, for all scopes, that are covered by these products

SM3.2

Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data using the following template and attach it to the response

SM3.2a

Product 1 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

Total +/- % change emissions in Date of previous figure Explanation of Methods used to from previous Description of SKU (Stock Keeping kg CO2e per supplied change estimate figure supplied good/service Unit) unit lifecycle

emissions

SM3.2b Product 1 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 1 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 1 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 1 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 2 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 2 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 2 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 2 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 2 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 3 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 3 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 3 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 3 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 3 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 4 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 4 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 4 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 4 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 4 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 5 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 5 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 5 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 5 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 5 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 6 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 6 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 6 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d Product 6 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 6 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 7 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 7 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 7 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 7 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 7 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 8 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 8 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 8 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 8 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 8 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 9 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 9 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 9 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 9 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 9 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 10 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 10 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 10 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 10 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 10 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 11 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 11 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 11 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 11 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 11 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 12 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 12 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 12 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 12 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 12 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 13 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 13 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 13 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 13 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 13 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 14 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 14 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 14 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 14 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 14 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 15 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 15 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 15 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d Product 15 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 15 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 16 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 16 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 16 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 16 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 16 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 17 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 17 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 17 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 17 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 17 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 18 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 18 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 18 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 18 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 18 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 19 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 19 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 19 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 19 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 19 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

SM3.2a

Product 20 - Please describe the goods/services for which you want to provide data

emissions

SM3.2b

Product 20 - Data for lifecycle stages

Emissions (kg CO2e) per unit Please enter lifecycle stage at the lifecycle stage Is this stage under your Data quality Type of data used ownership or control?

SM3.2c

Product 20 - Please detail emission reduction initiatives completed or planned for this product Completed or planned Emission reductions in kg Initiative number or name Description of initiative CO2e per unit

SM3.2d

Product 20 - Have any of the initiatives described in SM3.2c been driven by requesting members?

SM3.2e

Product 20 - Please explain which initiatives have been driven by requesting members Requesting member(s) Initiative number or name

Module: Sign Off [Supply Chain]

Page: Sign Off [Supply Chain]

Please enter the name of the individual that has signed off (approved) the response and their job title

C. Loney -Safety & Environmental Staff Engineer- Rev 1 10:30am Tuesday 8/13 W.I.Archer - Director Global Sustainability

CDP 2013 CDP Supply Chain 2013 Information Request