DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:Math/0110064V1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:Math/0110064V1 Holonomy and monodromy groupoids∗ Ronald Brown Ilhan˙ I¸cen˙ School of Informatics University of In¨on¨u˙ Mathematics Division Faculty of Science and Art University of Wales Department of Mathematics Bangor, Gwynedd Malatya/ Turkey LL57 1UT, U.K. [email protected] [email protected] Osman Mucuk University of Erciyes Faculty of Science and Art Department of Mathematics Kayseri/Turkey [email protected] November 6, 2018 Abstract We outline the construction of the holonomy groupoid of a locally Lie groupoid and the monodromy groupoid of a Lie groupoid. These specialise to the well known holonomy and monodromy groupoids of a foliation, when the groupoid is just an equivalence relation. Introduction The holonomy and monodromy groupoids of foliations are well known, and with their smooth structure are usually attributed to Winkelnkemper [41] and Phillips [37]. The purpose of this paper is to advertise the fact, due to Pradines in 1966 [38], that these constructions are special arXiv:math/0110064v1 [math.DG] 5 Oct 2001 cases of constructions which apply to wide classes of structured groupoids, where the foliation case is essentially that where the groupoid is the equivalence relation determined by the leaves of the foliation. In the final section, we suggest a number of wider questions and possible directions for investigation, in particular the possible relation with generalised Galois theory, and the potentiality of higher dimensional analogues. An important feature of Pradines’ work is that these constructions of holonomy and mon- odromy groupoids come with universal properties of a local-to-global form. The association of ∗MSC2000: 18F20, 22A22, 58H05 1 monodromy with a universal principle is classical, see for example Chevalley [18]. The mon- odromy principle asserts roughly that, in a simply connected situation, for example a simply connected group, or an equivalence relation on a simply connected space, a local morphism ex- tends to a global morphism. More generally, a local morphism can be lifted to a global morphism on the universal cover. The association of holonomy with a universal principle is less well known. It is stated in terms of an adjoint pair of functors, but not explained in detail, in [38]. It involves the notion of what Pradines called ‘un morceau d’un groupo¨ıde diff´erentiables’ and which we prefer to call a ‘locally Lie groupoid’. This is a groupoid G and a subset W of G containing the identities and such that W has the structure of a manifold. Conditions are imposed so that the groupoid structure is as ‘smooth as possible’ on W . There is a kind of ‘holonomy principle’ that, in the ‘locally sectionable’ case (see below), the manifold structure on W extends to a Lie groupoid structure not on G but on an overgroupoid Hol(G, W ) of G, and in which W is an open subspace. The case when Hol(G, W ) = G is also of interest, since this gives a condition for the pair (G, W ) to be extendible. This is used crucially to obtain a Lie structure on the monodromy groupoid of a Lie groupoid. Thus whereas usually the holonomy groupoid is constructed as a quotient of the monodromy groupoid, here we regard the holonomy construction as fundamental. This difference of approach seems of interest. Another question arising from this work is the applicability of the notion of locally Lie groupoid for encapsulating ideas of local structures. It is proven by Brown and Mucuk in [17] that the charts of a foliation on a paracompact manifold gives rise to a locally Lie groupoid. This process is generalised by Brown and I¸cen˙ in [9] to the case of a local subgroupoid. We also note recent work of Claire Debord [20] which studies the case of singular foliations, and has constructions whose relation to those given here would be interesting to determine. One aim for Pradines of this notion of what we call a locally Lie groupoid was as a half way house between a Lie algebroid and a Lie groupoid. We have not found a clear statement of which Lie algebroids give rise to a locally Lie groupoid, but the two steps of holonomy and monodromy groupoid were designed to model two of the three steps in getting an essentially unique Lie group from a Lie algebra, namely: produce from the Lie algebra a locally Lie group; from this produce a Lie group; finally, take the universal cover of this Lie group. It is remarkable that Pradines’ intuitions on these steps was so strong. The main ideas of the results and proofs for the holonomy and monodromy groupoids were described by Pradines to Brown in the early 1980s, and an incomplete account was written in [5]. A full account of the holonomy construction and related material was given in Aof’s Bangor thesis [2] and published in [3]. A full account of the monodromy construction was given in Mucuk’s Bangor thesis [36] and published in [17]. It should be emphasised that this gives useful conditions for the groupoid M(G), obtained from a Lie groupoid by taking the universal covers of the stars of G at the identities, to be given the structure of Lie groupoid so that the projection M(G) → G gives the universal covering map on each star. A key aspect of the construction is that M(G) is initially defined by a universal construction which ensures that it comes with a monodromy principle on the extendibility to M(G) of certain local morphisms on G. The problem is to get a topology on M(G) and this, remarkably, is solved by the holonomy construction, but in the case where the holonomy is trivial. This seems a roundabout method. The point, however, seems to be that the construction of the topology 2 involves local smooth admissible sections, and the proof that this method works seems to be no simpler in the case of trivial holonomy than in the general case. Thus it is important to be clear about the general method. The use of local admissible sections for these constructions seems essential. To see this we contrast with the group case. If G is a topological group, then left multiplication Lg by an element g of G maps open sets of G to open sets, and in fact Lg is a homeomorphism of G. This is no longer the case if G is topological groupoid, for obvious domain reasons. To remedy this situation, Ehresmann introduced the notion of ‘smooth local continuous admissible section’ σ of a Lie groupoid G. This is a smooth section of the source map α defined on some open set U of the object space OG and such that βσ maps U diffeomorphically to an open set of OG. Then left multiplication Lσ can be defined on G and does map open sets of G to open sets of G. We say that left multiplication by an element has to be ‘localised’, that is ‘spread’ to a local area. Intuitively, we regard σ and its associated Lσ as a ‘local procedure’ on the Lie groupoid G. In the case of a locally Lie groupoid (G, W ) there is a new twist. We can say that σ is smooth only if the image of σ lies in W , since only W has a manifold structure. We call such a σ a ‘local procedure’. The composition in the groupoid G extends to a composition of local admissible sections, and so such a composition can be regarded as a ‘composite of local procedures’, but such a composition may not have values in W and so is not a ‘local procedure’. In fact in the literature, more so in physics than in mathematics, the notion of holonomy is regarded as an iteration of local procedures which returns to the starting point but not to the starting value. We will see this interpreted as a germ [σ]x of such a composite for which σ(x) = 1x but there is no neighbourhood U of x for which σ(U) is contained in W and σ|U is smooth. That is, the iteration does not even locally give a local procedure. The convenient formal description of the above is in terms of inverse monoids and groupoids of germs. The nice point is that the formal description does exactly encapsulate the intuition, and it is the intention of this paper to convey this point. Now we give some precise definitions. 1 Definitions We fix our notation. A groupoid consists of a set G and two functions, the source and target maps, α, β : G → G such that αβ = β,βα = α (whence α2 = α, β2 = β, and α and β have the same image). We often write g : αg → βg. Further, there is a multiplication written, say, gh, for g, h ∈ G, with the property that gh is defined if and only if βg = αh, and then α(gh) = αg, β(gh) = βh. The set αG is called the set of identities, or objects, of the groupoid G, and is written OG. If x ∈ αG one often writes 1x for x to emphasise that such an x acts as an identity. We also require associativity of the multiplication, and the existence of an inverse to every element of G. It is often convenient to think of OG as disjoint from G. Thus a groupoid is also a small category in which every morphism is an isomorphism. A groupoid in which α = β is called a bundle of groups, while a groupoid in which the anchor map (α, β) : G → OG × OG is injective is just an equivalence relation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monodromy Representations Associated to a Continuous Map
    Monodromy representations associated to a continuous map Salvador Borrós Cullell Supervisor: Dr. Pietro Polesello ALGANT Master Program Universität Duisburg-Essen; Università degli studi di Padova This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Master in Science July 2017 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Polesello for his infinite patience and his guidance while writing the thesis. His emphasis on writing mathematics in a precise and concise manner will forever remain a valuable lesson. I would also like to thank my parents for their constant support, specially during these two years I have been out of home. Despite the distance, they have kept me going when things weren’t going my way. A very special mention must be made of Prof. Marc Levine who introduced me to many of the notions that now appear in this thesis and showed unparalleled patience and kindness while helping me understand them in depth. Finally, I would like to thank my friends Shehzad Hathi and Jan Willem Frederik van Beck for taking up the role of a supportive family while living abroad. Abstract The aim of this thesis is to give a geometrical meaning to the induced monodromy rep- resentation. More precisely, given f : X ! Y a continuous map, the associated functor ind f f : P1(X) ! P1(Y) induces a functor Repk(P1(X)) ! Repk(P1(Y)) of the corresponding LCSH categories of representations. We will define a functor f∗ : LCSH(kX ) ! LCSH(kY ) from the category of locally constant sheaves on X to that of locally constant sheaves on Y in a way that the monodromy representation m LCSH is given by ind (m ), where m denotes f∗ F f F F the monodromy representation of a locally constant sheaf F on X.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/0507171V1 [Math.AG] 8 Jul 2005 Monodromy
    Monodromy Wolfgang Ebeling Dedicated to Gert-Martin Greuel on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Abstract Let (X,x) be an isolated complete intersection singularity and let f : (X,x) → (C, 0) be the germ of an analytic function with an isolated singularity at x. An important topological invariant in this situation is the Picard-Lefschetz monodromy operator associated to f. We give a survey on what is known about this operator. In particular, we re- view methods of computation of the monodromy and its eigenvalues (zeta function), results on the Jordan normal form of it, definition and properties of the spectrum, and the relation between the monodromy and the topology of the singularity. Introduction The word ’monodromy’ comes from the greek word µoνo − δρoµψ and means something like ’uniformly running’ or ’uniquely running’. According to [99, 3.4.4], it was first used by B. Riemann [135]. It arose in keeping track of the solutions of the hypergeometric differential equation going once around arXiv:math/0507171v1 [math.AG] 8 Jul 2005 a singular point on a closed path (cf. [30]). The group of linear substitutions which the solutions are subject to after this process is called the monodromy group. Since then, monodromy groups have played a substantial rˆole in many areas of mathematics. As is indicated on the webside ’www.monodromy.com’ of N. M. Katz, there are several incarnations, classical and l-adic, local and global, arithmetic and geometric. Here we concentrate on the classical lo- cal geometric monodromy in singularity theory. More precisely we focus on the monodromy operator of an isolated hypersurface or complete intersection singularity.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2010.15657V1 [Math.NT] 29 Oct 2020
    LOW-DEGREE PERMUTATION RATIONAL FUNCTIONS OVER FINITE FIELDS ZHIGUO DING AND MICHAEL E. ZIEVE Abstract. We determine all degree-4 rational functions f(X) 2 Fq(X) 1 which permute P (Fq), and answer two questions of Ferraguti and Micheli about the number of such functions and the number of equivalence classes of such functions up to composing with degree-one rational func- tions. We also determine all degree-8 rational functions f(X) 2 Fq(X) 1 which permute P (Fq) in case q is sufficiently large, and do the same for degree 32 in case either q is odd or f(X) is a nonsquare. Further, for several other positive integers n < 4096, for each sufficiently large q we determine all degree-n rational functions f(X) 2 Fq(X) which permute 1 P (Fq) but which are not compositions of lower-degree rational func- tions in Fq(X). Some of these results are proved by using a new Galois- theoretic characterization of additive (linearized) polynomials among all rational functions, which is of independent interest. 1. Introduction Let q be a power of a prime p.A permutation polynomial is a polyno- mial f(X) 2 Fq[X] for which the map α 7! f(α) is a permutation of Fq. Such polynomials have been studied both for their own sake and for use in various applications. Much less work has been done on permutation ra- tional functions, namely rational functions f(X) 2 Fq(X) which permute 1 P (Fq) := Fq [ f1g. However, the topic of permutation rational functions seems worthy of study, both because permutation rational functions have the same applications as permutation polynomials, and because of the con- struction in [24] which shows how to use permutation rational functions over Fq to produce permutation polynomials over Fq2 .
    [Show full text]
  • The Monodromy Groups of Schwarzian Equations on Closed
    Annals of Mathematics The Monodromy Groups of Schwarzian Equations on Closed Riemann Surfaces Author(s): Daniel Gallo, Michael Kapovich and Albert Marden Reviewed work(s): Source: Annals of Mathematics, Second Series, Vol. 151, No. 2 (Mar., 2000), pp. 625-704 Published by: Annals of Mathematics Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/121044 . Accessed: 15/02/2013 18:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Annals of Mathematics is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of Mathematics. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:57:11 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Annals of Mathematics, 151 (2000), 625-704 The monodromy groups of Schwarzian equations on closed Riemann surfaces By DANIEL GALLO, MICHAEL KAPOVICH, and ALBERT MARDEN To the memory of Lars V. Ahlfors Abstract Let 0: 7 (R) -* PSL(2, C) be a homomorphism of the fundamental group of an oriented, closed surface R of genus exceeding one. We will establish the following theorem. THEOREM. Necessary and sufficient for 0 to be the monodromy represen- tation associated with a complex projective stucture on R, either unbranched or with a single branch point of order 2, is that 0(7ri(R)) be nonelementary.
    [Show full text]
  • Galois Theory Towards Dessins D'enfants
    Galois Theory towards Dessins d'Enfants Marco Ant´onioDelgado Robalo Disserta¸c~aopara obten¸c~aodo Grau de Mestre em Matem´aticae Aplica¸c~oes J´uri Presidente: Prof. Doutor Rui Ant´onioLoja Fernandes Orientador: Prof. Doutor Jos´eManuel Vergueiro Monteiro Cidade Mour~ao Vogal: Prof. Doutor Carlos Armindo Arango Florentino Outubro de 2009 Agradecimentos As` Obsess~oes Em primeiro lugar e acima de tudo, agrade¸co`aminha M~aeFernanda. Por todos os anos de amor e de dedica¸c~ao.Obrigado. Agrade¸coao meu Irm~aoRui. Obrigado. As` minhas Av´os,Diamantina e Maria, e ao meu Av^o,Jo~ao.Obrigado. Este trabalho foi-me bastante dif´ıcilde executar. Em primeiro lugar pela vastid~aodo tema. Gosto de odisseias, da proposi¸c~aoaos objectivos inalcan¸c´aveis e de vis~oespanor^amicas.Seria dif´ıcilter-me dedicado a uma odisseia matem´aticamaior que esta, no tempo dispon´ıvel. Agrade¸coprofundamente ao meu orientador, Professor Jos´eMour~ao: pela sua enorme paci^enciaperante a minha constante mudan¸cade direc¸c~aono assunto deste trabalho, permitindo que eu pr´oprio encontrasse o meu caminho nunca deixando de me apoiar; por me ajudar a manter os p´esnos ch~aoe a n~aome perder na enorme vastid~aodo tema; pelos in´umeros encontros regulares ao longo de mais de um ano. A finaliza¸c~aodeste trabalho em tempo ´utils´ofoi poss´ıvel com a ajuda da sua sensatez e contagiante capacidade de concretiza¸c~ao. Agrade¸cotamb´emao Professor Paulo Almeida, que talvez sem o saber, me ajudou a recuperar o entu- siasmo pela procura da ess^enciadas coisas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monodromy Groupoid of a Lie Groupoid Cahiers De Topologie Et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques, Tome 36, No 4 (1995), P
    CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES RONALD BROWN OSMAN MUCUK The monodromy groupoid of a Lie groupoid Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 36, no 4 (1995), p. 345-369 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1995__36_4_345_0> © Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1995, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET Volume XXXVI-4 (1995) GEOMETRIE DIFFERENTIELLE CATEGORIQUES THE MONODROMY GROUPOID OF A LIE GROUPOID by Ronald BROWN and Osman MUCUK Resume: Dans cet article, on montre que, sous des condi- tions générales, Punion disjointe des recouvrements universels des étoiles d’un groupoide de Lie a la structure d’un groupoide de Lie dans lequel la projection possède une propriete de mon- odromie pour les extensions des morphismes locaux reguliers. Ceci complete un rapport 46ta,iU6 de r6sultats announces par J. Pradines. Introduction The notion of monodromy groupoid which we describe here a.rose from the grand scheme of J. Pradines in the ea.rly 1960s to generalise the standard construction of a simply connected Lie group from a Lie al- gebra to a corresponding construction of a. Lie grOllpOld from a Lie algebroid, a notion first defined by Pradines.
    [Show full text]
  • LIE GROUPOIDS and LIE ALGEBROIDS LECTURE NOTES, FALL 2017 Contents 1. Lie Groupoids 4 1.1. Definitions 4 1.2. Examples 6 1.3. Ex
    LIE GROUPOIDS AND LIE ALGEBROIDS LECTURE NOTES, FALL 2017 ECKHARD MEINRENKEN Abstract. These notes are under construction. They contain errors and omissions, and the references are very incomplete. Apologies! Contents 1. Lie groupoids 4 1.1. Definitions 4 1.2. Examples 6 1.3. Exercises 9 2. Foliation groupoids 10 2.1. Definition, examples 10 2.2. Monodromy and holonomy 12 2.3. The monodromy and holonomy groupoids 12 2.4. Appendix: Haefliger’s approach 14 3. Properties of Lie groupoids 14 3.1. Orbits and isotropy groups 14 3.2. Bisections 15 3.3. Local bisections 17 3.4. Transitive Lie groupoids 18 4. More constructions with groupoids 19 4.1. Vector bundles in terms of scalar multiplication 20 4.2. Relations 20 4.3. Groupoid structures as relations 22 4.4. Tangent groupoid, cotangent groupoid 22 4.5. Prolongations of groupoids 24 4.6. Pull-backs and restrictions of groupoids 24 4.7. A result on subgroupoids 25 4.8. Clean intersection of submanifolds and maps 26 4.9. Intersections of Lie subgroupoids, fiber products 28 4.10. The universal covering groupoid 29 5. Groupoid actions, groupoid representations 30 5.1. Actions of Lie groupoids 30 5.2. Principal actions 31 5.3. Representations of Lie groupoids 33 6. Lie algebroids 33 1 2 ECKHARD MEINRENKEN 6.1. Definitions 33 6.2. Examples 34 6.3. Lie subalgebroids 36 6.4. Intersections of Lie subalgebroids 37 6.5. Direct products of Lie algebroids 38 7. Morphisms of Lie algebroids 38 7.1. Definition of morphisms 38 7.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Iterated Monodromy Groups Arxiv:1403.0899V1 [Math.DS] 4 Mar 2014
    Introduction to Iterated Monodromy Groups Sébastien Godillon March 24, 2012 Abstract The theory of iterated monodromy groups was developed by Nekrashevych [Nek05]. It is a wonderful example of application of group theory in dynamical systems and, in particular, in holomorphic dynamics. Iterated monodromy groups encode in a computationally efficient way combinatorial information about any dynamical system induced by a post-critically finite branched covering. Their power was illustrated by a solution of the Hubbard Twisted Rabbit Problem given by Bartholdi and Nekrashevych [BN06]. These notes attempt to introduce this theory for those who are familiar with holomor- phic dynamics but not with group theory. The aims are to give all explanations needed to understand the main definition (Definition 10) and to provide skills in computing any iter- ated monodromy group efficiently (see examples in Section 3.3). Moreover some explicit links between iterated monodromy groups and holomorphic dynamics are detailed. In particular, Section 4.1 provides some facts about combinatorial equivalence classes, and Section 4.2 deals with matings of polynomials. Contents 1 Preliminaries 3 1.1 Tree automorphism . 3 1.2 Partial self-covering . 9 2 Tree of preimages 10 2.1 A right-hand tree . 10 2.2 A left-hand tree . 11 3 Iterated monodromy group 14 arXiv:1403.0899v1 [math.DS] 4 Mar 2014 3.1 Monodromy action . 14 3.2 Definition . 17 3.3 Examples . 19 4 Some properties in holomorphic dynamics 29 4.1 Combinatorial invariance . 29 4.2 Matings . 33 References 38 1 Representations of groups, automata, bimodules and virtual endomorphisms are inten- tionally omitted in order to make this introduction more elementary.
    [Show full text]
  • Monodromy of Elliptic Surfaces 1 Introduction
    Monodromy of elliptic surfaces Fedor Bogomolov and Yuri Tschinkel January 25, 2006 1 Introduction Let E → B be a non-isotrivial Jacobian elliptic fibration and Γ˜ its global monodromy group. It is a subgroup of finite index in SL(2, Z). We will assume that E is Jacobian. Denote by Γ the image of Γ˜ in PSL(2, Z) and by H the upper half-plane completed by ∞ and by rational points in R ⊂ C. 1 The j-map B → P decomposes as jΓ ◦ jE , where jE : B → MΓ = H/Γ 1 and jΓ : MΓ → P = H/PSL(2, Z). In an algebraic family of elliptic fi- brations the degree of j is bounded by the degree of the generic element. It follows that there is only a finite number of monodromy groups for each family. The number of subgroups of bounded index in SL(2, Z) grows superex- ponentially [8], similarly to the case of a free group (since SL(2, Z) con- tains a free subgroup of finite index). For Γ of large index, the number of 2 MΓ-representations of the sphere S is substantially smaller, however, still superexponential (see 3.5). Our goal is to introduce some combinatorial structure on the set of mon- odromy groups of elliptic fibrations which would help to answer some natural questions. Our original motivation was to describe the set of groups corre- sponding to rational or K3 elliptic surfaces, explain how to compute the dimensions of the spaces of moduli of surfaces in this class with given mon- odromy group etc.
    [Show full text]
  • A P-Adic Local Monodromy Theorem
    Annals of Mathematics, 160 (2004), 93–184 A p-adic local monodromy theorem By Kiran S. Kedlaya Abstract We produce a canonical filtration for locally free sheaves on an open p-adic annulus equipped with a Frobenius structure. Using this filtration, we deduce a conjecture of Crew on p-adic differential equations, analogous to Grothendieck’s local monodromy theorem (also a consequence of results of Andr´e and of Mebkhout). Namely, given a finite locally free sheaf on an open p-adic annulus with a connection and a compatible Frobenius structure, the module admits a basis over a finite cover of the annulus on which the connec- tion acts via a nilpotent matrix. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. Crew’s conjecture on p-adic local monodromy 1.2. Frobenius filtrations and Crew’s conjecture 1.3. Applications 1.4. Structure of the paper 1.5. An example: the Bessel isocrystal 2. A few rings 2.1. Notation and conventions 2.2. Valued fields 2.3. The “classical” case K = k((t)) 2.4. More on B´ezout rings 2.5. σ-modules and (σ, ∇)-modules 3. A few more rings 3.1. Cohen rings 3.2. Overconvergent rings 3.3. Analytic rings: generalizing the Robba ring 3.4. Some σ-equations 3.5. Factorizations over analytic rings 3.6. The B´ezout property for analytic rings 94 KIRAN S. KEDLAYA 4. The special Newton polygon 4.1. Properties of eigenvectors 4.2. Existence of eigenvectors 4.3. Raising the Newton polygon 4.4. Construction of the special Newton polygon 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Arboreal Representations, Sectional Monodromy Groups
    Arboreal representations, sectional monodromy groups, and abelian varieties over finite fields by Borys Kadets Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2020 ○c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author................................................................ Department of Mathematics March 31, 2020 Certified by. Bjorn Poonen Distinguished Professor in Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Davesh Maulik Graduate Co-Chair, Department of Mathematics 2 Arboreal representations, sectional monodromy groups, and abelian varieties over finite fields by Borys Kadets Submitted to the Department of Mathematics on March 31, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract This thesis consists of three independent parts. The first part studies arboreal rep- resentations of Galois groups – an arithmetic dynamics analogue of Tate modules – and proves some large image results, in particular confirming a conjecture of Odoni. Given a field K, a separable polynomial f 2 K[x], and an element t 2 K, the full − S ∘−k backward orbit O (t) := k f (t) has a natural action of the Galois group GalK . For a fixed f 2 K[x] with deg f = d and for most choices of t, the orbit O−(t) has − the structure of complete rooted d-ary tree T1. The Galois action on O (t) thus defines a homomorphism 휑 = 휑f;t : GalK ! Aut T1. The map 휑f;t is the arboreal representation attached to f and t. In analogy with Serre’s open image theorem, one expects im 휑 = Aut T1 to hold for most f; t, but until very recently for most degrees d not a single example of a degree d polynomial f 2 Q[x] with surjective 휑f;t was known.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1806.09784V2 [Math.GT]
    EMBEDDINGS OF 3–MANIFOLDS VIA OPEN BOOKS DISHANT M. PANCHOLI, SUHAS PANDIT, AND KULDEEP SAHA Abstract. In this note, we discuss embeddings of 3–manifolds via open books. First we show that every open book of every closed orientable 3–manifold admits an open book embedding in any open book decom- pistion of S2 × S3 and S2×eS3 with the page a disk bundle over S2 and monodromy the identity. We then use open book embeddings to reprove that every closed orientable 3–manifold embeds in S5. 1. Introduction Let M be a closed oriented smooth manifold and B be a co-dimension 2 oriented smooth submanifold with a trivial normal bundle in M. We say that M has an open book decomposition, denoted by Ob(B, π), if M \ B is a locally trivial fibre bundle over S1 such that the fibration π in a neighborhood of B looks like the trivial fibration of (B × D2) \ (B ×{0}) → S1 sending (x, r, θ) to θ, where x ∈ B and (r, θ) are polar co-oridinates on D2 and the boundary of each fibre is B which we call the binding. The closure of each fibre is called the page of the open book and the monodromy of the fibration is called the monodromy of the open book. An open book decomposition of M is determined – up to diffeomorphism of M – by the topological type of the page Σ and the isotopy class of the monodromy which is an element of the mapping class group of Σ. In [Al], J.
    [Show full text]