DOCSLIB.ORG

View the Full Report in PDF (8.8

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View the Full Report in PDF (8.8 CONTENTS Abstract ..................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope .........................................................................................................................................................4 Previous investigations ..................................................................................................................................................4 Acknowledgments .........................................................................................................................................................5 Description of the study area .........................................................................................................................................5 Climate..................................................................................................................................................................5 Hydrology, soils, and topography .........................................................................................................................5 Water use...............................................................................................................................................................6 Model development................................................................................................................................................................6 Overview of the hydrological simulation program - FORTRAN (HSPF).....................................................................6 Model assumptions........................................................................................................................................................8 Watershed segmentation ................................................................................................................................................8 Land use.........................................................................................................................................................................8 Development of nutrient application rates...................................................................................................................11 Animal counts, animal units, and the manure land-use category........................................................................11 Organic fertilizer calculations.............................................................................................................................13 Nutrient requirements and goal yields ................................................................................................................13 Total nutrient applications...................................................................................................................................13 Method of fertilizer application ..........................................................................................................................18 Schedule of organic fertilizer application ...........................................................................................................18 Schedule of mineral fertilizer application...........................................................................................................18 Planting and harvesting dates..............................................................................................................................20 Atmospheric deposition...............................................................................................................................................20 On-site wastewater disposal system information ........................................................................................................20 Point sources................................................................................................................................................................20 Meteorological data .....................................................................................................................................................21 Development of water-quality data base for model calibration...................................................................................22 Model calibration approach..................................................................................................................................................22 Calibration of hydrology .............................................................................................................................................23 Parameter estimation...........................................................................................................................................23 Objective function for parameter estimation ......................................................................................................23 Calibration of total suspended solids and nutrients.....................................................................................................24 Analysis of model calibration and results ............................................................................................................................24 Calibration of hydrology .............................................................................................................................................26 Annual and monthly water balance.....................................................................................................................26 Mean daily streamflow time series .....................................................................................................................28 Calibration of total suspended solids...........................................................................................................................31 Annual edge-of-stream yields .............................................................................................................................31 Hourly concentration time series ........................................................................................................................31 Calibration of nutrients................................................................................................................................................31 Annual edge-of-stream yields .............................................................................................................................34 Hourly concentration time series ........................................................................................................................36 Summary and conclusions....................................................................................................................................................40 References cited ...................................................................................................................................................................40 iii Figures 1a. Hydrogeomorphic regions of the Delmarva Peninsula and location of the Delaware Inland Bays watershed ...........................................................................................................................................................2 1b. Detailed view of the Delaware Inland Bays watershed, Sussex County, Delaware................................................3 2. Soils map for the Inland Bays watershed showing percent organic matter, soil permeability, and a hydrologic characteristics grouping code (STATSGO group number)...............................................................7 3. Hydrological Simulation Program–FORTRAN (HSPF) Inland Bays watershed model segmentation, locations of U.S. Geological Survey stream-gaging stations, hourly and daily precipitation stations, and the major nutrient point source near Georgetown, Delaware...........................9 4. Generalized land-use map of the Delaware Inland Bays watershed .....................................................................12 5. Crop hectare allocations for the model..................................................................................................................13 6. Grouping of model segments with identical parameter values, indicating the calibration model segment source for those values ........................................................................................................................25 7. Monthly simulated and observed streamflow for the six calibrated basins during 1999......................................27 8. Simulated and observed daily flows, with daily precipitation intensity, for the six calibrated basins during 1999.............................................................................................................................................29 9. Simulated daily edge-of-stream streamflow components and total streamflow simulated at the end of the reach for the five single-segment calibrated basins during 1999 ...............................................30 10. Simulated total suspended solids yield during water year 1999 by model segment ............................................32 11. Simulated hourly total
Load more

Recommended publications
  • County Council Minutes, As Evidence of Support for Nullifica­ Tion of Property Assessments and Tax Increase, Within the Boundaries of Sussex County, State of Delaware
    SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL-GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE-FEBRUARY 25, 1975 Call to The regular meeting of the Sussex County Council was held on Order Tuesday, February 25, 1975 at 10:00 A. M. with the following members present: Ralph E. Benson President John T. Cannon, Sr. Vice President Charles W. Cole Member Oliver E. Hill Member W. Howard Workman Member The meeting was opened with the repeating of the Lord's Prayer and the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag. M 102 75 A Motion was made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. Workman, to Minutes approve the minutes of the previous meeting as presented. Approved Motion Adopted by Voice Vote. Corre­ The following correspondence was read by Mr. Betts, County spond ence Solicitor: National Association of Counties. Re: NACo's Research Foundation that has started working on a two-year grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism with the initial studies of counties as pro­ viders of major human services, including hospital, clinic, court, and correctional services being convincing that County government is ideally situated to offer comprehensive services that will help prevent and treat alcoholism and alcohol abuse. The above correspondence was referred to Mr. Conaway, County Administrator. John J. McNeilly, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Delaware. Re: Requesting the painters to return and complete their job of unsticking the windows in his chambers. The above correspondence was referred to Mr. Henry, County Engineer. The following petition was read by Mr. Betts, County Solicitor: District #4 Sussex County The American Legion Georgetown, Dela. 19947 February 18, 1975 Sussex County Council Sussex County Courthouse Georgetown, Dela.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES and ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DIVISION of WATER RESOURCES Statutory Authority: 7 Delaware Code, Chapters 40, 60, 66 and 72 (7 Del.C., Chs
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Statutory Authority: 7 Delaware Code, Chapters 40, 60, 66 and 72 (7 Del.C., Chs. 40, 60, 66 & 72) 7 DE Admin. Code 7403 PROPOSED REGISTER NOTICE SAN#2002- 06 1. TITLE OF THE REGULATION: 7403 Regulations Governing the Pollution Control Strategy for the Indian River, Indian River Bay, Rehoboth Bay and Little Assawoman Bay Watersheds, Delaware. 2. BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF THE SUBJECT, SUBSTANCE AND ISSUES: The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) plans to conduct a public hearing to gather comments on the proposed Pollution Control Strategy for the Inland Bays including the proposed Regulations Governing the Pollution Control Strategy for the Indian River, Indian River Bay, Rehoboth Bay, and Little Assawoman Bay Watersheds. The proposed Strategy includes both voluntary and regulatory actions which need to be implemented in order to achieve the nitrogen and phosphorus load reductions required by the Total Maximum Daily Loads for these watersheds. The proposed regulations would impact multiple sources of nutrients including point sources, stormwater, and onsite wastewater treatment and disposal systems. These regulations replace the previously proposed regulations that appeared in the May 1, 2007 Delaware Register of Regulations. 3. POSSIBLE TERMS OF THE AGENCY ACTION: Following the adoption of the proposed Regulations, various programs to reduce nutrient pollutant loadings will be implemented. 4. STATUTORY BASIS OR LEGAL AUTHORITY TO ACT: The authority to develop this Pollution Control Strategy and the associated Regulations is provided by Title 7 of the Delaware Code, Chapters 40, 60, 66, and 72 and in Title 29 of the Delaware Code, Sections 8014(5) and 8025.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Sand-Resource Assessment of the Delaware Shelf
    FEDERAL SAND-RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE DELAWARE SHELF Technical Report for Cooperative Agreement M14AC00003 Kelvin W. Ramsey, C. Robin Mattheus, John F. Wehmiller, Jaime L. Tomlinson, Trevor Metz Delaware Geological Survey University of Delaware May 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ......…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………….…….…… 2 Motivation …………………………………………………………………….…………. 2 Objectives ………………………………………………….………………….….……… 4 Background ……………………………………………………………………………… 4 Delaware Shelf Stratigraphy ………..……………………..…………….……….. 4 Delaware Coastal Plain Geology …………………………………….…………... 6 METHODS AND DATA MANAGEMENT …………………..………………………….…….. 8 DGS-BOEM Survey Area …..…………………………………………………………… 8 Stratigraphic Framework Mapping ………………………………………………………. 8 Geophysical Data ………………………………………………………………… 8 Core Data ……………………………………………………………………….. 11 Surface and Volume Models ……..…………………………………………………….. 12 GEOLOGIC MAPPING RESULTS …...……………………………………………………….. 12 Seismic Mapping …………….…………………………………………………………. 12 Subsurface Interpretations …………………………………….………….…….. 12 Seismic Units, Bounding Surfaces, and Facies …………………………. 13 Lithologic Mapping …………………………………………………………………….. 14 Sheet sand (Qss)..………………………………………………….……….…… 14 Shoal sand (Qsl) ………………………………………………………………… 16 Intershoal (Qis) …...………………………………………………….…………. 16 Ravinement lag deposits (Qrl) …………….………………….…….…….…….. 16 Lagoonal/Estuarine (Ql, Qlh, Qsi, Qo) ………………………………………….. 16 Marine sand (Qms).……………………………………………………….…….. 17 Fluvio-deltaic (Tbd)..…………………………………………………………… 17 SEDIMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Park TIS Review Letter
    April 2, 2019 Mr. D.J. Hughes Davis, Bowen & Friedel, Inc. 1 Park Avenue Milford, DE 19963 Dear Mr. Hughes: The enclosed Traffic Impact Study (TIS) review letter for the proposed Ocean Park (Tax Parcels 334-12.00-50.00 & 51.00) development has been completed under the responsible charge of a registered professional engineer whose firm is authorized to work in the State of Delaware. They have found the TIS to conform to DelDOT’s Development Coordination Manual and other accepted practices and procedures for such studies. DelDOT accepts this review letter and concurs with the recommendations. If you have any questions concerning this letter or the enclosed review letter, please contact me at (302) 760-2167. Sincerely, Troy Brestel Project Engineer TEB:km Enclosures cc with enclosures: Mr. Ring Lardner, Davis, Bowen & Friedel, Inc. Ms. Constance C. Holland, Office of State Planning Coordination Ms. Janelle Cornwell, Sussex County Planning and Zoning Mr. Andrew Parker, McCormick Taylor, Inc. DelDOT Distribution DelDOT Distribution Brad Eaby, Deputy Attorney General Drew Boyce, Director, Planning Mark Luszcz, Chief Traffic Engineer, Traffic, DOTS Michael Simmons, Assistant Director, Project Development South, DOTS J. Marc Coté, Assistant Director, Development Coordination T. William Brockenbrough, Jr., County Coordinator, Development Coordination Peter Haag, Traffic Studies Manager, Traffic, DOTS Alastair Probert, South District Engineer, South District Gemez Norwood, South District Public Works Manager, South District Susanne Laws, Sussex Subdivision Review Coordinator, Development Coordination David Dooley, Service Development Planner, Delaware Transit Corporation Mark Galipo, Traffic Engineer, Traffic, DOTS Sarah Coakley, Principal Planner, Statewide & Regional Planning Anthony Aglio, Planning Supervisor, Statewide & Regional Planning Derek Sapp, Sussex County Subdivision Reviewer, Development Coordination Claudy Joinville, Project Engineer, Development Coordination April 1, 2019 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assawoman Wildlife Area Sussex County, Delaware
    Historical Analysis and Map of Vegetation Communities, Land Covers, and Habitats of Assawoman Wildlife Area Sussex County, Delaware Little Assawoman Bay and Indian River Bay Watersheds Submitted to: Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife 4876 Hay Point Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977 Completed by: Robert Coxe, Ecologist Delaware Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program Wildlife Section, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control 4876 Hay Point Landing Road Smyrna, DE 19977 July 12, 2012 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction and Methods ............................................................................................. 4 Setting of Assawoman Wildlife Area ......................................................................................... 4 History and Formation of Assawoman Wildlife Area ................................................................ 5 Early History of the Land ....................................................................................................... 5 Formation of Assawoman Wildlife Area ................................................................................ 5 Soils and Geology of Assawoman Wildlife Area ....................................................................... 6 Underlying Geology................................................................................................................ 6 Soil .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GM18 Geologic Map of the Bethany Beach and Assawoman Bay
    DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY University of Delaware, Newark GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BETHANY BEACH AND ASSAWOMAN BAY QUADRANGLES, DELAWARE David R. Wunsch, State Geologist GEOLOGIC MAP SERIES NO. 18 6' 75° 4' 2' 75° 0' 0" W 75° 7' 30" W 38° 37' 30" N EXPLANATION 38° 37' 30" N 10 Qd Qscy Qm Delaware Seashore State Park LONG NECK RD f Qm 1 FILL OMAR FORMATION Qo Qd Qm f 3 Man-made and natural materials (sand, gravel) emplaced in stream valleys or marshes to Light-gray to gray, silty clay to silty, very fine sand with scattered shell beds. The Omar Qd Qscy f 3 Formation consists of up to 5 ft of light to dark-gray, basal, pebbly, coarse to very coarse L O N G N E C K 7 Qss bring the topography above grade, usually in road beds, dams, or construction near a 20 shoreline. Fill deposits include sediment dredged from the marshes and offshore in sand that grades upward into 1 to 3 ft of gray to very dark-gray, fine to coarse silty sand Tbd f Qm Qm Indian River Bay and emplaced on the uplands. with scattered laminae to thin beds of peat composed of sand to gravel-size plant Steels Qbw 40 Qm Big Ditch fragments. The sands are overlain by 3 to 5 ft of very dark-gray to black organic-rich Cove f Qfs Qscy Qns sandy silt to silty clay. Above this organic-rich zone, in the areas where the Omar is 6 Qqw of Holocene lagoon (Ql) at depth thickest, 10 to 40 ft of greenish-gray, compact, silty clay to clayey silt is common.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 – Comprehensive Land Use Plan
    This page left black intentionally for printing purposes TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Chapter 1 | Introduction Authority to Plan Comprehensive Plan History Plan Coordination Vision & Goals Chapter 2 | Community Character Location & History Physical Conditions & Climate Community Design Healthy Communities Complete Communities Chapter 3 | Town & Community Services Town Government Public Safety & Health Library Education Solid Waste & Recycling Collection Places of Worship Postal Service Social Services Community Organizations Chapter 4 | Community Profile Population Population Projections Race & Ethnicity Age Education Income & Poverty Chapter 5 |Housing Profile Occupancy Household Size Housing Age Affordability & Challenges Goals & Recommendations Chapter 6 |Economic Development Employment Economic Base & Labor Market Income &Poverty Economic Development Goals & Recommendations Chapter 7 |Transportation Road Network Corridor Capacity Preservation Program TOWN OF SELBYVILLE 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 Pedestrian & Bicycle Circulation Public Transportation Freight Railroad Facilities Air Travel Evacuation Route Transportation Studies & Projects Goals & Recommendations Chapter 8 |Utilities Water Wastewater Sourcewater Protection Miscellaneous Services Goals & Recommendations Chapter 9 |Environmental Protection Floodplain Wetlands Stormwater Management Total Maximum Daily Loads Air Quality Climate Change Goals & Recommendations Chapter 10 |Open Space & Recreation Open Space & Recreation Agricultural Preservation Goals & Recommendations
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Delaware
    SE M3ER 985 U.s. - artm nt of h - n erior S ate of D lawa FiSh and Wildlife Service Department of Natural Resourc and Enviro mental Con ra I WETLANDS OF DELAWARE by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. Regional Wetland Coordinator Habitat Resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Newton Corner, MA 02158 SEPTEMBER 1985 Project Officer David L. Hardin Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Wetlands Section State of Delaware 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 Cooperative Publication U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Delaware Department of Natural Region 5 Resources and Environmental Habitat Resources Control One Gateway Center Division of Environmental Control Newton Corner, MA 02158 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 This report should be cited as follows: Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Newton Corner, MA and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section, Dover, DE. Cooperative Publication. 77 pp. Acknowledgements Many individuals have contributed to the successful completion of the wetlands inventory in Delaware and to the preparation of this report. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section contributed funds for wetland mapping and database construction and printed this report. David Hardin served as project officer for this work and offered invaluable assistance throughout the project, especially in coor­ dinating technical review of the draft report and during field investigations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District also provided funds for map production. William Zinni and Anthony Davis performed wetland photo interpretation and quality control of draft maps, and reviewed portions of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Evolution of an Estuarine Coast and Tidal Wetlands
    Holocene evolution of an estuarine coast and tidal wetlands CHARLES H. FLETCHER, III Department of Geology and Astronomy, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19383 HARLEY J. KNEBEL U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 JOHN C. KRAFT Geology Department, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716 ABSTRACT and Kraft (1985), Chrzastowski and Kraft (1985), Fletcher (1986), Fletcher and Kraft (1986a), Fletcher and Pizzuto (1986), Knebel and Modern facies-distribution patterns, extensive core data, and others (1988) (Fig. 1C), Knebel and Circe (1988), and Knebel (1989) chronostratigraphic cross sections provide a detailed history of Holo- have expanded on the earlier investigations of Moody and Van Reenan cene inundation within the Delaware Bay estuary and sedimentation (1967), Moose (1973), Sheridan and others (1974), Kraft and others in adjacent coastal environments. Flooding of the estuary occurred (1975), Weil and others (1975), Weil (1976, 1977), and Twichell and with rising sea level as the shoreline retreated northwest along a path others (1977). From these newer studies, a more detailed picture of the determined by the pre-transgression topography. Simultaneous migra- evolution of Delaware Bay estuary is emerging. tion of an estuarine turbidity maximum depocenter provided the bulk In this paper, we describe the evolutionary history of the coastal of fine sediments which form the coastal Holocene section of the sedimentary system along the southwest shore of Delaware Bay. Knowl- estuary. Prior to 10 Ka, the ancestral bay was predominantly a tidal edge of the modern distribution of sedimentary facies (Fig. IE) in both river, and the turbidity maximum depocenter was located southeast of coastal and offshore environments (Jordan and Groot, 1962; Parker and the modern bay mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenwick Island State Park
    FENWICK ISLAND STATE PARK • Fenwick Island State Park is managed as part of Delaware State Parks’ Delaware Seashore Region, which has 17 full-time staff. • The park offers three miles of beaches along the Atlantic Ocean, and bayside access points along Little Assawoman Bay. • The park has 378 acres and welcomed 230,638 visitors last year. • A 2018 economic impact study indicated Fenwick Island State Park contributed $60 million in visitor spending, the third-highest in the Delaware State Park system. Current Challenges at Fenwick Island State Park Much of Fenwick Island State Park’s infrastructure is obsolete, and the park lacks amenities OBSOLETE INFRASTRUCTURE • Undersized bathhouse • No continuous sidewalk pedestrian access from town limits into the park • Periodic flooding • Buildings are not all ADA-compliant Main entrance to the park Flooding, following a fall cloudburst Current Challenges at Fenwick Island State Park Much of Fenwick Island State Park’s infrastructure is obsolete, and the park lacks amenities PARKING ISSUES • Insufficient parking – The park reached capacity on a record 50 days during the 2019 summer season, more than any other Delaware state park. When the lot is full, traffic backs out onto Route 1, creating hazards for bikers and other vehicles and blocking entrance to the Chamber of Commerce • Parking lot has badly deteriorated and needs significant improvements. Main parking lot (aerial) • One-in/one-out parking when the park is at capacity blocks emergency routes. This can literally create a life-or-death situation in the event of sudden lightning strikes, serious traffic accidents, or other life-threatening emergencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Assawoman Bay Watershed Plan Are Intended to Fulfill the Elements of a Watershed Plan in Compliance with the A) Through I) Criteria As Established by EPA
    WATERSHED PLAN Little Assawoman Bay Watershed Prepared by: Delaware NPS Program 2011 The contents of the Little Assawoman Bay Watershed Plan are intended to fulfill the elements of a Watershed Plan in compliance with the a) through i) criteria as established by EPA. Version I Complete: February 25, 2011 Submitted: March 5, 2012 By: Mark Hogan Delaware NPS Program Executive Summary The contents of the Little Assawoman Bay Watershed Plan are intended to fulfill the elements of a Watershed Plan in compliance with the a) through i) criteria established by EPA. The Little Assawoman Bay Watershed Plan addresses the following criteria: Causes and Sources of Impairment Expected Load Reductions Proposed Management Measure Technical/Financial Needs Information, Education and Public Participation Component Schedule and Milestones Load Reduction and WQ Evaluation Monitoring Strategy Nutrient over-enrichment has long been a concern in Delaware’s Inland Bays, specifically in the Indian River, Indian River Bay, Rehoboth Bay and Little Assawoman Bay and their tributaries. Many plans have been made in order to correct these problems, but few were as contentious as the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) regulations promulgated by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (Department). They were established for the Indian River, Indian River Bay and Rehoboth Bay in December, 1998 and for the Little Assawoman Bay in January 2005. These TMDLs called for the systematic elimination of all point sources of nutrient loading to those water bodies along with a 40-65% reduction in nonpoint phosphorus loading and a 40-85% reduction in nonpoint nitrogen loading see Appendix B.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry and Geophysical Framework of the Shallow Sediments of Assawoman Bay and Isle of Wight Bay in Maryland
    Department of Natural Resources MARK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Emery T. Cleaves, Director COASTAL ESTU GEOLOGY OPEN FILE REPORT NO. 15 Geochemistry and geophysical framework of the shallow sediments of Assawoman Bay and Isle of Wight Bay in Maryland Darlene V. Wells, Robert D. Conkwright, and June Park Subnlitted to U.S.Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Coidiilental Margins Prograi~~ and Bureau of Econoinic Geology The Univel-sity of Texas at At~stin in fiilfillment of Contract #I 4-35-000 1-30534 COMMISSION OF THE MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. GORDON WOLMAN, CHAIRMAN F. PIERCE LNAWEAVER THOMAS 0. NUTTLE ROBERT W. RIDKU CONTENTS Page Abstract .................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................. 3 Objectives ............................................... 3 Acknowledgements ........................................ 4 Previous Studies .......................................... 4 StudyArea .................................................. 5 Geologic Setting .......................................... 5 Physical Characteristics ..................................... 8 Summary and Conclusions ....................................... 10 Results and Discussion .......................................... 12 Seismic Profiles ........................................... 12 Sediment Texture .......................................... 16 Water Content ............................................ 18 Geochemistry ............................................ 19 Nitrogen Content
    [Show full text]