Economics, Wildlife Tourism and Conservation Three Case Studies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economics, Wildlife Tourism and Conservation Three Case Studies ECONOMICS, WILDLIFE TOURISM AND CONSERVATION THREE CASE STUDIES By Clem Tisdell and Clevo Wilson ECONOMICS, WILDLIFE TOURISM AND CONSERVATION: Three case studies TECHNICAL REPORTS The technical report series present data and its analysis, meta-studies and conceptual studies, and are considered to be of value to industry, government and researchers. Unlike the Sustainable Tourism Cooperative Research Centre’s Monograph series, these reports have not been subjected to an external peer review process. As such, the scientific accuracy and merit of the research reported here is the responsibility of the authors, who should be contacted for clarification of any content. Author contact details are at the back of this report. EDITORS Prof Chris Cooper University of Queensland Editor-in-Chief Prof Terry De Lacy Sustainable Tourism CRC Chief Executive Prof Leo Jago Sustainable Tourism CRC Director of Research National Library of Australia Cataloguing in Publication Data Tisdell, C. A. (Clement Allan), 1939- . Economic, wildlife tourism and conservation : three case studies. Bibliography. ISBN 1 920704 15 9. 1. Wildlife recreation - Economic aspects - Australia - Case studies. 2. Ecotourism - Economic aspects - Australia - Case studies. 3. Birds - Queensland - Lamington National Park. 4. Wildlife - Antarctica. 5. Arachnocampa - Queensland - Springbrook National Park. I. Wilson, Clevo. II. Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism. III. Title. 333.95417 Copyright © CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd 2004 All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this book may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the publisher. Any enquiries should be directed to Brad Cox, Communications Manager [[email protected]] or Trish O’Connor, Publishing Manager [[email protected]]. ii ECONOMICS, WILDLIFE TOURISM AND CONSERVATION: Three case studies CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS _____________________________________________________________ VI SUMMARY __________________________________________________________________________VII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ___________________________________________________________1 CHAPTER 2 ECONOMICS, VALUE OF WILDLIFE TOURISM AND CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS________________________________________________________________________3 INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________________________3 ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WILDLIFE TOURISM ON INCOME AND EMPLOYMENT _________________________3 TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUE OF WILDLIFE AND TOURISM: SOME ISSUES ______________________________4 EMPIRICAL ESTIMATES OF THE IMPORTANCE OF WILDLIFE TOURISM: ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS _________6 ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS AND WILDLIFE TOURISM – THEIR PURPOSE AND USEFULNESS _______________7 DISCUSSION __________________________________________________________________________9 CHAPTER 3 CASE STUDY I: BIRDS AS A VISITOR ATTRACTION TO LAMINGTON NATIONAL PARK_____________________________________________________________________10 INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________________10 THE NATURE OF THE SURVEY AND THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS ________________11 STATED REASONS FOR VISITING O’REILLY’S/GREEN MOUNTAIN SITE AND ACTIVITIES ENGAGED IN_____13 PARTICULAR ATTRIBUTES/ASPECTS OF BIRDS AS ATTRACTIONS TO THE O’REILLY’S/GREEN MOUNTAINS SITE _____________________________________________________________________15 ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND ECONOMIC ISSUES ________________________________________________16 ATTITUDES TO CHARGING ENTRY FEES TO LNP______________________________________________17 SCOPE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT AND BETTER PROVISION OF INFORMATION ______________18 DISCUSSION _________________________________________________________________________19 CHAPTER 4 CASE STUDY II: ANTARCTIC WILDLIFE AS A TOURIST ATTRACTION _______21 INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________________21 SOME BACKGROUND ON ANTARCTIC TOURISM ______________________________________________21 SURVEYS, SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF RESPONDENTS, AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR THEIR ANTARCTIC TRIP______________________________________________________________________23 RESPONDENTS’ EVALUATIONS OF ANTARCTIC WILDLIFE_______________________________________25 OPINIONS OF RESPONDENTS ABOUT VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES INVOLVING ANTARCTICA _______28 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION ___________________________________________________________29 CHAPTER 5 CASE STUDY III: GLOW WORMS BASED TOURISM AT NATURAL BRIDGE IN SOUTHEAST QUEENSLAND ___________________________________________________________32 INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________________________32 GENERAL BACKGROUND ON INSECT-BASED TOURISM AND GLOW WORMS IN AUSTRALIA _____________32 THE NATURAL BRIDGE GLOW WORM SITE AND GENERAL DATA ON ITS VISITORS____________________34 SURVEY METHODOLOGY _______________________________________________________________36 THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE OF INDEPENDENT VISITORS VIEWING GLOW WORMS AT NATURAL BRIDGE_____________________________________________________________________37 THE IMPORTANCE OF GLOW WORMS AT THIS SITE AS A TOURIST ATTRACTION AND THE ECONOMIC VALUE AND ECONOMIC IMPACT OF VISITS _________________________________________39 VISITORS’ KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESENCE OF THE GLOW WORM SITE AT NATURAL BRIDGE AND OF SUBSTITUTE SITES IN THE AREA __________________________________________________________41 VISITORS’ KNOWLEDGE OF GLOW WORMS__________________________________________________41 ECONOMIC SCOPE FOR VALUE ADDING ACTIVITIES AT THE NATURAL BRIDGE SITE __________________43 NEGATIVE SPILLOVERS FROM OTHER VISITORS AND THE QUESTION OF WHETHER INDEPENDENT VISITORS SHOULD PAY FEES TO VIEW GLOW WORMS AT NATURAL BRIDGE________________________44 DISCUSSION OF CASE III ________________________________________________________________44 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUDING COMMENTS________________________________________________46 OVERALL COVERAGE IN RETROSPECT _____________________________________________________46 LIMITATIONS_________________________________________________________________________47 SOME POSSIBLE IMPLICATIONS FOR THOSE IN THE TOURISM INDUSTRY____________________________47 APPENDIX A: O’REILLY’S /GREEN MOUNTAINS SURVEY FORM_________________________50 APPENDIX B: ANTARCTICA – PRE-VISIT SURVEY FORM________________________________54 iii ECONOMICS, WILDLIFE TOURISM AND CONSERVATION: Three case studies APPENDIX B (CONT’D): POST-VISIT SURVEY FORM ____________________________________59 APPENDIX C: NATURAL BRIDGE SURVEY FORM _______________________________________64 REFERENCES ________________________________________________________________________68 AUTHORS____________________________________________________________________________71 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Sampled visitors classified by frequency of their visits to O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains, LNP ______ 12 Table 2: Country and state of origin of Australian visitors to O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains, LNP___________ 12 Table 3: Composition of sampled visitors to O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains, LNP by duration of stay and country of origin __________________________________________________________________ 13 Table 4: Main reason given by sampled visitors (in an open-ended question) for visiting O’ Reilly’s/Green Mountains, LNP __________________________________________________________________ 14 Table 5: The relative importance of reasons for visiting O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains features at the site as stated by respondents ____________________________________________________________ 14 Table 6: Importance to visitors of various attributes of birdlife at O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains site – frequency of responses _____________________________________________________________ 15 Table 7: Cross tabulation of relative frequencies in per cent with which respondents rated specified attributes of birds as important or very important for their visit to the survey site________________ 15 Table 8: Average expenditures per person per day within a 60 kilometre radius of O’Reilly’s/ Green Mountains site as reported by respondents_________________________________________ 16 Table 9: Environmental improvements suggested by respondents for O’Reilly’s/Green Mountains, LNP ____ 19 Table 10: Estimates of numbers of tourists utilising Antarctica in the 2003-04 season by tourism types _____ 22 Table 11: In which country do you normally reside? (Pre-visit question) - distribution of responses ________ 23 Table 12: To what age group do you belong? (Pre-visit survey) - distribution of responses _______________ 23 Table 13: Indicate your highest educational qualification (Pre-visit survey) - distribution of responses ______ 24 Table 14: Family income level per annum? (Pre-visit survey) - distribution of responses _________________ 24 Table 15: If you are interested in Antarctic wildlife, is your interest mainly in which species listed? (you may tick more than one box) - distribution of responses. _____________________________ 25 Table 16: Responses to the questions: (Pre-Visit): How important was the possibility of seeing Antarctic/ Sub-Antarctic wildlife in your decision to come on this journey? (Post-Visit): How important was seeing Antarctic/Sub-Antarctic wildlife during this cruise? Distribution of responses. __________ 26 Table 17: Index of satisfaction anticipated and obtained from seeing Antarctic wildlife species based on responses to the following
Recommended publications
  • Bioluminescence Is Produced by a Firefly-Like Luciferase but an Entirely
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN New Zealand glowworm (Arachnocampa luminosa) bioluminescence is produced by a Received: 8 November 2017 Accepted: 1 February 2018 frefy-like luciferase but an entirely Published: xx xx xxxx new luciferin Oliver C. Watkins1,2, Miriam L. Sharpe 1, Nigel B. Perry 2 & Kurt L. Krause 1 The New Zealand glowworm, Arachnocampa luminosa, is well-known for displays of blue-green bioluminescence, but details of its bioluminescent chemistry have been elusive. The glowworm is evolutionarily distant from other bioluminescent creatures studied in detail, including the frefy. We have isolated and characterised the molecular components of the glowworm luciferase-luciferin system using chromatography, mass spectrometry and 1H NMR spectroscopy. The purifed luciferase enzyme is in the same protein family as frefy luciferase (31% sequence identity). However, the luciferin substrate of this enzyme is produced from xanthurenic acid and tyrosine, and is entirely diferent to that of the frefy and known luciferins of other glowing creatures. A candidate luciferin structure is proposed, which needs to be confrmed by chemical synthesis and bioluminescence assays. These fndings show that luciferases can evolve independently from the same family of enzymes to produce light using structurally diferent luciferins. Glowworms are found in New Zealand and Australia, and are a major tourist attraction at sites located across both countries. In contrast to luminescent beetles such as the frefy (Coleoptera), whose bioluminescence has been well characterised (reviewed by ref.1), the molecular details of glowworm bioluminescence have remained elusive. Tese glowworms are the larvae of fungus gnats of the genus Arachnocampa, with eight species endemic to Australia and a single species found only in New Zealand2.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia-15-Index.Pdf
    © Lonely Planet 1091 Index Warradjan Aboriginal Cultural Adelaide 724-44, 724, 728, 731 ABBREVIATIONS Centre 848 activities 732-3 ACT Australian Capital Wigay Aboriginal Culture Park 183 accommodation 735-7 Territory Aboriginal peoples 95, 292, 489, 720, children, travel with 733-4 NSW New South Wales 810-12, 896-7, 1026 drinking 740-1 NT Northern Territory art 55, 142, 223, 823, 874-5, 1036 emergency services 725 books 489, 818 entertainment 741-3 Qld Queensland culture 45, 489, 711 festivals 734-5 SA South Australia festivals 220, 479, 814, 827, 1002 food 737-40 Tas Tasmania food 67 history 719-20 INDEX Vic Victoria history 33-6, 95, 267, 292, 489, medical services 726 WA Western Australia 660, 810-12 shopping 743 land rights 42, 810 sights 727-32 literature 50-1 tourist information 726-7 4WD 74 music 53 tours 734 hire 797-80 spirituality 45-6 travel to/from 743-4 Fraser Island 363, 369 Aboriginal rock art travel within 744 A Arnhem Land 850 walking tour 733, 733 Abercrombie Caves 215 Bulgandry Aboriginal Engraving Adelaide Hills 744-9, 745 Aboriginal cultural centres Site 162 Adelaide Oval 730 Aboriginal Art & Cultural Centre Burrup Peninsula 992 Adelaide River 838, 840-1 870 Cape York Penninsula 479 Adels Grove 435-6 Aboriginal Cultural Centre & Keep- Carnarvon National Park 390 Adnyamathanha 799 ing Place 209 Ewaninga 882 Afghan Mosque 262 Bangerang Cultural Centre 599 Flinders Ranges 797 Agnes Water 383-5 Brambuk Cultural Centre 569 Gunderbooka 257 Aileron 862 Ceduna Aboriginal Arts & Culture Kakadu 844-5, 846 air travel Centre
    [Show full text]
  • South East Queensland
    YOUR FAMILY’S GUIDE TO EXPLORING OUR NATIONAL PARKS SOUTH EAST QUEENSLAND Featuring 78 walks ideal for children Contents A BUSH ADVENTURE A bush adventure with children . 1 Planning tips . 2 WITH CHILDREN As you walk . 4 Sometimes wonderful … As you stop and play . 6 look what can we As you rest, eat and contemplate . 8 This is I found! come again? Great short walks for family outings. 10 awesome! Sometimes more of a challenge … I'm tired/ i need are we hungry/bored the toilet nearly there? Whether the idea of taking your children out into nature fills you with a sense of excited anticipation or nervous dread, one thing is certain – today, more than ever, we are well aware of the benefits of childhood contact with nature: 1. Positive mental health outcomes; 2. Physical health benefits; 3. Enhanced intellectual development; and 4. A stronger sense of concern and care for the environment in later life. Planet Ark – Planting Trees: Just What the Doctor Ordered Above all, it can be fun! But let’s remember … Please don’t let your expectations of what should “If getting our kids out happen as you embark on a bush adventure into nature is a search for prevent you from truly experiencing and perfection, or is one more enjoying what does happen. Simply setting chore, then the belief in the intention to connect your children to a perfection and the chore natural place and discover it alongside defeats the joy.” 2nd Edition - 2017 them is enough. We invite you to enjoy Produced & published by the National Parks Association of Queensland Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomechanical Properties of Fishing Lines of the Glowworm
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Biomechanical properties of fshing lines of the glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa (Diptera; Received: 4 June 2018 Accepted: 9 January 2019 Keroplatidae) Published: xx xx xxxx Janek von Byern 1,2, Pete Chandler3, David Merritt4, Wolfram Adlassnig2, Ian Stringer5, Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow6, Alexander Kovalev 7, Victoria Dorrer8, Simone Dimartino 9, Martina Marchetti-Deschmann 8 & Stanislav Gorb7 Animals use adhesive secretions in highly diverse ways, such as for settlement, egg anchorage, mating, active or passive defence, etc. One of the most interesting functions is the use of bioadhesives to capture prey, as the bonding has to be performed within milliseconds and often under unfavourable conditions. While much is understood about the adhesive and biomechanical properties of the threads of other hunters such as spiders, barely anything is documented about those of the New Zealand glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa. We analysed tensile properties of the fshing lines of the New Zealand glowworm Arachnocampa luminosa under natural and dry conditions and measured their adhesion energy to diferent surfaces. The capture system of A. luminosa is highly adapted to the prevailing conditions (13–15 °C, relative humidity of 98%) whereby the wet fshing lines only show a bonding ability at high relative humidity (>80%) with a mean adhesive energy from 20–45 N/m and a stronger adhesion to polar surfaces. Wet threads show a slightly higher breaking strain value than dried threads, whereas the tensile strength of wet threads was much lower. The analyses show that breaking stress and strain values in Arachnocampa luminosa were very low in comparison to related Arachnocampa species and spider silk threads but exhibit much higher adhesion energy values.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Basis for the Blue Bioluminescence of the Australian Glow-Worm Arachnocampa Richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae)
    Accepted Manuscript Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae) Stephen C. Trowell, Helen Dacres, Mira M. Dumancic, Virginia Leitch, Rodney W. Rickards PII: S0006-291X(16)31203-7 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.081 Reference: YBBRC 36158 To appear in: Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications Received Date: 8 July 2016 Accepted Date: 19 July 2016 Please cite this article as: S.C. Trowell, H. Dacres, M.M. Dumancic, V. Leitch, R.W. Rickards, Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae), Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (2016), doi: 10.1016/ j.bbrc.2016.07.081. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Molecular basis for the blue bioluminescence of the Australian glow-worm Arachnocampa richardsae (Diptera: Keroplatidae) Stephen C. Trowell 1* , Helen Dacres 2, Mira M. Dumancic 1, Virginia Leitch 1, Rodney W. Rickards 3#. 1. CSIRO, Black Mountain Laboratories, Canberra, ACT2601. 2. CSIRO, 671 Sneydes Road, Werribee, VIC3030. 3. Research School of Chemistry, ANU, Canberra, ACT2601. * Corresponding author – [email protected] # Deceased MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 1 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ABSTRACT Bioluminescence is the emission of visible light by living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturallygc Full Program Booklet
    CONNECT, CONSERVE, EXPLORE NATURE #NaturallyGC NaturallyGC Program JULY 2021 – JUNE 2022 Connecting the Gold Coast community with nature through free and low-cost environmental workshops, events, activities and sustainable nature-based recreation. NaturallyGC Ambassador MAYOR’S MESSAGE Patrick Brabant “Enviro Warrior” Ruby and Noah Jay Protecting, restoring, and promoting The Gold Coast is one of the most the Gold Coasts natural areas is at the beautiful and biodiverse cities in Australia Helping nature delivers a better community centre of the NaturallyGC program. I and we’re excited to be NaturallyGC am excited to be involved in a unique youth ambassadors for 2021−22! program like NaturallyGC and feel We both love wildlife and are privileged to be one of its ambassadors. passionate about helping to preserve Feeling connected to our natural world is something inherent in the human spirit. It is even more important now in these stressful and restore natural habitats. times that we take time to connect and On weekends, we can often be found The challenges of Covid-19 brought that Thanks to NaturallyGC, the community can experience our local natural environment. desire for better connectivity to the fore help play a vital role in the conservation planting trees in local parks, cleaning – whether it was through people enjoying of our natural areas and get their The NaturallyGC program is an important the beach or co-presenting Junior Wild their local parks and open space or hands dirty by planting native trees or community asset and provides a great Defenders workshops for children. connecting to local organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (Reporting Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020)
    Report on the administration of the Nature Conservation Act 1992 (reporting period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020) Prepared by: Department of Environment and Science © State of Queensland, 2020. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Disclaimer This document has been prepared with all due diligence and care, based on the best available information at the time of publication. The department holds no responsibility for any errors or omissions within this document. Any decisions made by other parties based on this document are solely the responsibility of those parties. If you need to access this document in a language other than English, please call the Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS National) on 131 450 and ask them to telephone Library Services on +61 7 3170 5470. This publication can be made available in an alternative format (e.g. large print or audiotape) on request for people with vision impairment; phone +61 7 3170 5470 or email <[email protected]>. September 2020 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nature Conservation Act 1992—departmental administrative responsibilities ............................................................. 1 List of legislation and subordinate legislation ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tamborine National Park and Tamborine Forest Reserve Management Statement 2013
    Tamborine National Park and Tamborine Forest Reserve Management Statement 2013 Legislative framework Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 Park size: Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Tamborine National Park 2,080 hectares (ha) Act 1999 (Cwlth) Tamborine Forest Reserve 12ha Forestry Act 1958 Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth) Bioregion: South Eastern Nature Conservation Act 1992 Queensland Plans and agreements QPWS region: South East Bonn Convention Local government Scenic Rim Regional Border Ranges Rainforest Biodiversity Management Plan NSW & Queensland estate/area: Council China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement Gold Coast City Council Japan–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement State electorate: Albert National recovery plan for the black-breasted button- quail Turnix melanogaster Beaudesert Recovery plan for stream frogs of south-east Gaven Queensland 2001-2005 Republic of Korea–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement South East Queensland Horse Riding Trail Network Management Plan 2011 Southern macadamia species recovery plan Thematic strategies Level 1 Fire Management Strategy Level 2 Pest Management Strategy Land mullet Egernia major. Photo: NPRSR Vision Tamborine National Park and Tamborine Forest Reserve (both referred to as Tamborine herein), will be managed to protect its high biodiversity values, exceptional scenic and natural features, and varied recreational and tourism opportunities. The park will continue to protect and present the rich Aboriginal and shared-history cultural values, including the early conservation efforts associated with Queensland’s first national park. Tamborine National Park and Tamborine Forest Reserve Management Statement 2013 Conservation purpose A small section of the now Tamborine National Park was originally gazetted in 1908 as Witches Falls National Park under the State Forest and National Parks Act of 1906, making it Queensland’s first national park.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Climate Change Impacts on Park Values on Four Queensland World Heritage National Parks in Australia
    A comparison of climate change impacts on park values on four Queensland World Heritage National Parks in Australia Sherri L Tanner-McAllister, Jonathan Rhodes, Marc Hockings Abstract Protected areas will vary in how they respond to climate related threats and impacts. An important step in adapting protected area management to respond to climate change is identifying how protected areas and their values may be impacted. This requires an understanding of the ecological and social system impacting on the particular values so that consideration of management options and issues can be informed by this understanding. A set of Bayesian belief networks were developed to assess impacts and management issues for three key values (stream-dwelling frogs, cool temperate forest and recreational walking access) across four National Parks (Springbrook, Lamington, Mount Barney and Main Range) in Queensland, Australia. The aim was to assess how those values may be impacted by climate change, how the parks differ in relation to likely impact and options for management adaptation. We observed, depending on a protected area’s physical and socio-ecological characteristics, that the values were likely to be differently affected across the parks and management responses will need to take account of these differences. Introduction Climate change is one of the most significant issues facing our natural environment (Sommer et al. 2010). Globally, there has been detectable increases in land and ocean surface temperatures, sea temperatures, ocean salinity and sea levels over the last three decades (IPCC 2013; Savage & Vellend 2015). Climate change projections of an increase in average temperatures are likely to exceed 1.5 - 2oC (relative to 1850 to 1900) by the end of this century (IPCC 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 19/20 Annual Report
    Annual Report TABLE OF CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS ................................................................... 4 CHAIRPERSON’S REPORT .............................................................. 6 INTERIM MANAGING DIRECTOR’S REPORT..................... 13 CHIEF EXECUTIVE REPORT ........................................................ 16 FRIENDS OF BINNA BURRA REPORT ..................................20 FINANCIAL REPORT .......................................................................... 21 COMPANY DETAILS ......................................................................... 52 PAGE 3 | BINNA BURRA LODGE LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2019-2020 BOARD OF DIRECTORS STEVE NOAKES, Chairperson Steve is a local Beechmont resident. He has an extensive 40 years of engagement in the tourism and travel sector as an entrepreneur, academic and volunteer in various not-for-profit organisations. He is founder of Pacific Asia Tourism, an international project management company that works with a range of multi-lateral and bilateral agencies in relation to sustainable tourism development. He is a Director of Ecolodges Indonesia and he played a leading role in the formation of the international body, the Global Sustainable Tourism Council. In 2008 he was recognised in the inaugural Ecotourism Australia Lifetime Achievement Awards for his contributions to the Australian and international ecotourism industry. He has served as an Adjunct Professor in Sustainable Tourism at Universities in Australia, Finland and Norway. SALLY TRESTRAIL, Director Sally joined the board of Binna Burra Lodge Limited in June 2019, having enjoyed the beautiful walks and unique hospitality provided by Binna Burra with her family and friends. She is Finance Director at Tourism and Events Queensland. She was previously Chief Financial Officer (CFO) at St John Ambulance Qld Limited and CFO and interim CEO at the Leukaemia Foundation of Australia, having transitioned to the not for profit sector after 10 years in private equity and corporate advisory firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourists to Lamington National Park, Economic and Other Dimensions Of
    ISSN 1327-8231 ECONOMICS, ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Working Paper No. 76 Visitor Profiles and Environmental Attributes, especially of Birds, Attracting Visitors to Lamington National Park: Tourist Attitudes and Economic Issues by Clem Tisdell and Clevo Wilson March 2003 THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND ISSN 1327-8231 WORKING PAPERS ON ECONOMICS, ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Working Paper No. 76 Visitor Profiles and Environmental Attributes, especially of Birds, Attracting Visitors to Lamington National Park: Tourist Attitudes and Economic Issues by Clem Tisdell* and Clevo Wilson* March 2003 © All rights reserved ∗† * School of Economics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072 Australia. Email: [email protected] WORKING PAPERS IN THE SERIES, Economics, Ecology and the Environment are published by the School of Economics, University of Queensland, 4072, Australia, as follow up to the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Project 40 of which Professor Clem Tisdell was the Project Leader. Views expressed in these working papers are those of their authors and not necessarily of any of the organisations associated with the Project. They should not be reproduced in whole or in part without the written permission of the Project Leader. It is planned to publish contributions to this series over the next few years. Research for ACIAR project 40, Economic impact and rural adjustments to nature conservation (biodiversity) programmes: A case study of Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China was sponsored by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), GPO Box 1571, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia. The research for ACIAR project 40 has led in part, to the research being carried out in this current series.
    [Show full text]
  • She-Oaks in Rural Landscape
    Glossy Black Fact Sheet No. 9 - Glossy Black Conservancy MONITORING GLOSSY BLACKS FEATHER COLLECTION PROTOCOL Background to the project protected areas (see Attachment 1 list). Should Glossy Black-Cockatoo (Calyptorhynchus you wish to collect feathers in a protected area lathami) is one of the rarest and most threatened not included in the list, please contact the of Australia’s large, black cockatoos. As the Conservancy and we can apply to include the population ecology of the species is so poorly protected area in the permit. understood on mainland Australia, the Glossy Black Conservancy is supporting ecological research and monitoring on the movement patterns and dispersal between breeding populations of Glossy Black-Cockatoos in South- Eastern Queensland and Far North-Eastern New South Wales. Traditional techniques of monitoring movement through capturing birds and attaching radio or satellite transmitters or other markings are both invasive and costly. The use of data derived from feathers provides a non-invasive alternative to infer the extent of regional movement on the basis of genetic and/or feather isotope analysis. Project aims The Glossy Black Conservancy is co-ordinating a research project to collect discarded (i.e. naturally moulted) feathers of Glossy Black- Cockatoo. The aim of the project is to accumulate a collection of feathers that may be Male Glossy Black-Cockatoo aged between 1 and used for research projects to: (a) examine 3 years, showing a mixture of old, worn juvenile population genetic structure across the range of (barred black, more pointed with shaft extending the species using genetic material that can be beyond the tip) and newer immature (barred to extracted from feather shafts; and/or (b) use partially barred) or adult (unbarred) tail feathers isotope analysis of feather material to examine (Photo © Bobbi Marchini).
    [Show full text]