DOCSLIB.ORG

North Dakota Outdoors Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Dakota Outdoors Magazine MATTERSMATTERS OF OF O OPINIONPINION hen you read through the continue to increase. 2019 hunting season outlook The number of acres in this popular in this issue of North Dakota walk-in access program has climbed WOUTDOORS, there is plenty of the last few years from about 730,000 good news. acres in 2015 to 762,000 acres in 2018. Without giving it all away, some of Approximately 791,000 acres will what we know heading into the fall be available to hunters this year as we hunting season is an increase of more head into fall. than 10,000 licenses for the deer gun The Game and Fish Department’s season compared to 2018. private land staff, and the many land- While there are a number of things owners around the state who willingly that must align, including assistance participate in the PLOTS program, from Mother Nature and quality wildlife should be applauded. habitat on the landscape, deer gun That additional 30,000 acres is Terry Steinwand licenses are heading in the direction certainly good news for hunters. And Director Terry Steinwand hunters like to see. continuing this trend of maintaining the Director In 2015, the Game and Fish Depart- highest amount of quality habitat in ment made available only 43,275 deer the program as possible is the Depart- licenses, the lowest total since 1978. ment’s aim. The climb from that low (49,000 in By the time this message hits the 2016, 54,500 in 2017 and 55,150 in hands of readers, many hunters will 2018) has been slow, but encouraging, have already dirtied their hunting boots nonetheless. in pursuit of North Dakota’s early fall Also, North Dakota’s pronghorn opportunities, while waiting for other population is estimated to be the high- hunting seasons to open. est in nearly a decade, providing more Fall, depending on who you talk to, is hunting opportunities, in more hunting arguably the best time of year in North units, for hunters. Dakota. The opportunities are many for Additionally, the forecast for the fall those who enjoy the outdoors, hunting flight of ducks from North Dakota this birds and big game, or fishing our open year is expected to be up from last waters that are promised to ice over in year, while numbers for Canada and weeks to come. snow geese remain high. North Dakota is a special place In the category of more good news, that just seems to be at its best in fall. Kevin Kading, Department private Having enjoyed my share over the land section leader, reports that acre years, I encourage you to sample, with numbers in the Department’s Private family or friends, North Dakota’s great Land Open To Sportsmen program also outdoors in the coming days. DEPARTMENT DIRECTORY Governor Doug Burgum ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION Game and Fish Director: Terry Steinwand Deputy Director: Scott Peterson Chief, Administrative Services: Kim Kary Business Manager: Corey Wentland Administrative Staff Officer: Justin Mattson Administrative Assistant: Lynn Timm Administrative Officer/Building Maint. Supvr: George Lee Accounting Manager: Angie Morrison Accountants: Kelly Wike, Melissa Long, Ashley Baker The mission of the North Dakota Game and Fish Department is to protect, conserve and enhance fish and wildlife IT Section Supervisor/GIS Specialist: Brian Hosek IT Coordinators: Alan Reile, Larry Gross populations and their habitats for sustained public consumptive and nonconsumptive use. Licensing Manager: Randy Meissner Assistants: Gail Mosset, Amanda Anstrom, Tracy Price, . Tana Bentz, Tanya Mikkelsen Editor: Ron Wilson Graphic Designer: Connie Schiff Circulation Manager: Dawn Jochim Administrative Assistant – Dickinson: Janel Kolar, Stephanie Richardson Administrative Assistant – Devils Lake: Lisa Tofte Administrative Assistant – Jamestown: Tonya Kukowski AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2019 • NUMBER 2 • VOLUME LXXXII Administrative Assistant – Riverdale: Vacant Administrative Assistant – Williston: Vacant TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSERVATION AND COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION Division Chief: Greg Link, Bismarck FEATURES Communications Supervisor: Craig Bihrle, Bismarck Editor, North Dakota OUTDOORS: Ron Wilson, Bismarck 2019 Hunting Season Outlook ..........................................................................................................2 Digital Media Editor: Lara Anderson, Bismarck News Editor: Greg Freeman, Bismarck PLOTS Program Update ..................................................................................................................16 Video Project Supervisor: Mike Anderson, Bismarck “The Duck Factory” ......................................................................................................................... 20 Photographer/Asst. Videographer: Ashley Salwey Outreach Biologists: Doug Leier, West Fargo; Greg Gullickson, Minot; Pat Lothspeich, Bismarck; Jim Job, Grand Forks Information Specialist: Dawn Jochim, Bismarck DEPARTMENTS Graphic Artist: Connie Schiff, Bismarck Education Supervisor: Marty Egeland, Bismarck Buffaloberry Patch ........................................................................................................................... 28 Education Coordinators: Jeff Long, Brian Schaffer, Bismarck Hunter Education Coordinator: John Mazur, Bismarck Back Cast ..........................................................................................................................................33 Conservation Supervisor: Steve Dyke, Bismarck Resource Biologists: John Schumacher, Bruce Kreft, Bismarck Conservation Biologists: Sandra Johnson, Patrick Isakson, Elisha Mueller, Bismarck Administrative Assistant: Brandon Diehl, Bismarck ENFORCEMENT DIVISION Division Chief: Robert Timian, Bismarck Investigative Supervisor: Scott Winkelman, Bismarck Operations Supervisor: Jackie Lundstrom, Bismarck Warden Pilot: Jeff Sieger, Bismarck Region No. 1 Warden Supvr: Mark Pollert, Jamestown District Wardens: Corey Erck, Bismarck; Jerad Bluem, Steele; Michael Sedlacek, Fargo; Front Cover Tim Phalen, Wyndmere; Andrew Dahlgren, Edgeley; Erik Schmidt, Linton; Greg Hastings, Jamestown The number of elk licenses for 2019 increased in North Region No. 2 Warden Supvr: Paul Freeman, Devils Lake District Wardens: Jonathan Tofteland, Bottineau; Jonathan Peterson, Devils Lake; James Dakota compared to 2018. Photo by Craig Bihrle. Myhre, New Rockford; Blake Riewer, Grand Forks; Alan Howard, Cando; Peter Miley, Cavalier; Drew Johnson, Finley; Sam Feldman, Rugby Region No. 3 Warden Supvr: Doug Olson, Riverdale District Wardens: Jim Burud, Kenmare; Tim Larson, Turtle Lake; Ken Skuza, Riverdale; Michael Raasakka, Stanley; Brian Updike, Minot; Joe Lucas, Watford City; Shawn Sperling, Keenan Snyder, Williston Region No. 4 Warden Supvr: Dan Hoenke, Dickinson District Wardens: Kylor Johnston, Hazen; Art Cox, Bowman; Courtney Sprenger, Elgin; Zane Manhart, Golva; Jake Miller, Killdeer; Jeff Violett, Mandan; Zachary Schuchard, Richardton Administrative Assistant: Lori Kensington, Bismarck WILDLIFE DIVISION Division Chief: Jeb Williams, Bismarck Assistant Division Chief: Casey Anderson, Bismarck Official publication of the North Dakota Game and Fish Department (ISSN 0029-2761) Game Mgt. Section Leader: Stephanie Tucker, Bismarck Pilot: Jeff Faught, Bismarck 100 N. Bismarck Expressway, Bismarck, ND 58501-5095 Upland Game Mgt. Supervisor: Jesse Kolar, Dickinson Website: gf.nd.gov • email: [email protected] Upland Game Mgt. Biologist: Rodney Gross, Bismarck Migratory Game Bird Mgt. Supervisor: Mike Szymanski, Bismarck • Information 701-328-6300 • Administration 701-328-6305 Migratory Game Bird Biologist: Andrew Dinges, Bismarck • Outdoors Subscriptions 701-328-6363 Big Game Mgt. Supvr: Bruce Stillings, Dickinson Big Game Mgt. Biologists: Bill Jensen, Bismarck; Brett Wiedmann, Dickinson; • Hunter Education 701-328-6615 • Licensing 701-328-6335 Jason Smith, Jamestown • 24-Hour Licensing by Phone: 800-406-6409 Survey Coordinator: Chad Parent, Bismarck Wildlife Veterinarian: Dr. Charlie Bahnson, Bismarck • The TTY/TTD (Relay ND) number for the hearing or speech impaired is 800-366-6888 Game Management Technician: Ryan Herigstad, Bismarck Wildlife Resource Management Section Leader: Kent Luttschwager, Williston North Dakota OUTDOORS is published 10 times a year, monthly except for the months of April and Wildlife Resource Mgt. Supvrs: Bill Haase, Bismarck; Brian Prince, Devils Lake; Brian Kietzman, Jamestown; Dan Halstead, Riverdale; Blake Schaan, Lonetree September. Subscription rates are $10 for one year or $20 for three years. Group rates of $7 a year are avail- Wildlife Resource Mgt. Biologists: Arvid Anderson, Riverdale; Randy Littlefield, Lonetree; able to organizations presenting 25 or more subscriptions. Remittance should be by check or money order Rodd Compson, Jamestown; Judd Jasmer, Dickinson; Todd Buckley, Williston Wildlife Techs: Tom Crutchfield, Jim Houston, Bismarck; Dan Morman, Robert Miller, Riverdale; payable to the North Dakota Game and Fish Department. Indicate if subscription is new or renewal. The Ernest Dawson, Jamestown; Cordell Schmitz, Brandon Ramsey, Lonetree; Scott Olson, Devils numbers on the upper right corner of the mailing label indicate the date of the last issue a subscriber will Lake; Zach Kjos, Williston Private Land Section Leader: Kevin Kading, Bismarck receive unless the subscription is renewed. Asst. Private Land Coordinator: Doug Howie, Bismarck Private Land Field Operation Coordinator: Nathan Harling, Bismarck Permission to reprint materials appearing in North Dakota OUTDOORS must be obtained from the Private Land Biologists: Colin Penner, Levi Jacobson, Bismarck;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bears in Oklahoma
    April 2010 Bears in Oklahoma Our speaker for the April 19 meeting of the Oklahoma City Audubon Society will be Jeremy Dixon, wildlife biologist at the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. His presentation is titled “The Strange But True History of Bears in Oklahoma.” For many years Jeremy was a biologist in Florida where he studied the interactions between black bears and humans. His master’s research was on the Conservation Genetics of the Florida Black Bear. Jeremy moved to Lawton in 2009 to experience life out here in the middle of the continent. Our grass prairie and ancient granite mountains are a new living environment for him. However, the black bears are coming back across Oklahoma from the east presenting birders an experience with a new and large predator to which we are unaccustomed. With an education from Jeremy, hopefully we can learn how to watch the birds while not feeding the bears ourselves. Come out for bear-hugging good time at bird club and bring a friend. County Birding: Kingfisher Jimmy Woodard On March 11, the group of 7 birders entered Kingfisher County in the far southeast corner. We located several small lakes with waterfowl: Canada Geese, Gadwall, Mallard, Green- Winged Teal and Ruddy Duck. We also found an adult Bald Eagle, the first of two found during the trip. Driving the back roads, we observed Great Horned Owl, Phoebe, King- fisher, and a bunch of sparrows – Harris, White Crowned, Song, Savannah, & Lincoln’s. We visited fields along the Cimarron River southeast of Dover. Carla Brueggen & her hus- band lease fields in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Populations in Texas
    Wildlife Populations in Texas • Five big game species – White-tailed deer – Mule deer – Pronghorn – Bighorn sheep – Javelina • Fifty-seven small game species – Forty-six migratory game birds, nine upland game birds, two squirrels • Sixteen furbearer species (i.e. beaver, raccoon, fox, skunk, etc) • Approximately 900 terrestrial vertebrate nongame species • Approximately 70 species of medium to large-sized exotic mammals and birds? White-tailed Deer Deer Surveys Figure 1. Monitored deer range within the Resource Management Units (RMU) of Texas. 31 29 30 26 22 18 25 27 17 16 24 21 15 02 20 28 23 19 14 03 05 06 13 04 07 11 12 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 08 Blackland Prairie 20 731,745 21 367,820 Cross Timbers 22 771,971 23 1,430,907 24 1,080,818 25 1,552,348 Eastern Rolling Plains 26 564,404 27 1,162,939 Ecoregion RMU Area (Ha) 29 1,091,385 Post Oak Savannah 11 690,618 Edwards Plateau 4 1,308,326 12 475,323 5 2,807,841 18 1,290,491 6 583,685 19 2,528,747 7 1,909,010 South Texas Plains 8 5,255,676 28 1,246,008 Southern High Plains 2 810,505 Pineywoods 13 949,342 TransPecos 3 693,080 14 1,755,050 Western Rolling Plains 30 4,223,231 15 862,622 31 1,622,158 16 1,056,147 39,557,788 Total 17 735,592 Figure 2. Distribution of White-tailed Deer by Ecological Area 2013 Survey Period 53.77% 11.09% 6.60% 10.70% 5.89% 5.71% 0.26% 1.23% 4.75% Edwards Plateau Cross Timbers Western Rolling Plains Post Oak Savannah South Texas Plains Pineywoods Eastern Rolling Plains Trans Pecos Southern High Plains Figure 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Canvasback Aythya Valisineria
    Canvasback Aythya valisineria Class: Aves Order: Anseriformes Family: Anatidae Characteristics: A large diving duck, in fact the largest in its genus, the canvasback weighs about 2.5-3 pounds. The male has a chestnut-red head, red eyes, light white-grey body and blackish breast and tail. The female has a lighter brown head and neck that gets progressively darker brown toward the back of the body. Both sexes have a blackish bill and bluish-grey legs and feet. Range & Habitat: Behavior: Breeds in prairie potholes and A wary bird that is very swift in flight. They prefer to dive in shallow water winters on ocean bays to feed and will also feed on the water surface (Audubon). Reproduction: Several males will court and display to one female. Once a female chooses the male, they will form a monogamous bond through breeding season. They build a floating nest in stands of dense vegetation above shallow water and lay 7-12 olive-grey eggs. Often redheads will lay their eggs in canvasback nests which will result in canvasbacks laying fewer eggs. The female incubates the eggs which hatch after 23-28 days. The young feed themselves and mom leads them to water within hours of hatching. Lifespan: up to 20 years in Diet: captivity, 10 years in the wild. Wild: Seeds, plant material, snails and insect larvae, they dive to eat the roots and bases of plants Special Adaptations: They go Zoo: Scratch grains, greens, waterfowl pellets from freshwater marshes in summer to saltwater ocean bays in Conservation: winter. Some say the populations are decreasing while others say they are increasing due to habitat restoration and the ban on lead shot.
    [Show full text]
  • Canvasback and Lesser Scaup Activities and Habitat-Use on Pool 19, Upper Mississippi River
    Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science (1993), Volume 86, 1 and 2, pp. 33 - 45 Canvasback and Lesser Scaup Activities and Habitat-Use on Pool 19, Upper Mississippi River David M. Day1, Richard V. Anderson and Michael A. Romano Department of Biological Sciences Western Illinois University Macomb, IL 61455 1Current address: Illinois Department of Conservation Streams Program Aledo, IL 61231 ABSTRACT Behavior and habitat use of canvasback (Aythya valisineria) and lesser scaup (Aythya affinis) were assessed on Pool 19 of the Upper Mississippi River during the spring and fall of 1982 and the spring of 1983. Ducks were frequently observed in three sections of the study area; on the Illinois side of the river from Hamilton to Nauvoo; between Montrose and Niota; and in spring near Dallas City. Resting behavior was most prevalent, followed by diving (feeding) and loafing (sleeping). Lesser scaup dove more and spent less time loafing than canvasbacks. For all three seasons, within nonvegetated habitat, no significant seasonal or behavioral differences were found between male and female canvasbacks, but significant differences were found between the sexes of lesser scaup. Differences in activities between male and female lesser scaup did not persist when fall observations were excluded, suggesting seasonal differences in use of Pool 19. No significant seasonal or behavioral differences between species were observed in ducks using submergent vegetation during the spring periods. Activity patterns for both species, during the combined spring periods, were significantly different between submergent vegetation and nonvegetated areas. It appears these differences were due largely to changes in the distribution of diving and loafing activities between habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivation of Non-Breeding Duck
    North American Waterfowl Management Plan Science Support Team Technical Report No. 2019–01 Derivation of Regional, Non-breeding Duck Population Abundance Objectives to Inform Conservation Planning in North America — 2019 Revision Kathy K. Fleming U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Bird Management Michael K. Mitchell Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Southern Regional Office Michael G. Brasher Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Gulf Coast Joint Venture John M. Coluccy Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Great Lakes and Atlantic Regional Office J. Dale James Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Southern Regional Office Mark J. Petrie Ducks Unlimited, Inc., Western Regional Office, Pacific Coast Joint Venture Dale D. Humburg Ducks Unlimited, Inc., National Headquarters Gregory J. Soulliere U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Upper Mississippi / Great Lakes Joint Venture ABSTRACT During the early 2000s, a methodology was developed to derive regional non-breeding population abundance objectives from continental abundance estimates (M. Koneff, USFWS, unpublished data). This information was foundational to North American Waterfowl Management Plan (NAWMP) Joint Venture (JV) habitat conservation planning and implementation for non-breeding waterfowl, especially wintering ducks. The 2012 NAWMP Revision and its amended population objectives motivated JVs to begin updating their waterfowl implementation plans. Fleming et al. (2017) revisited the initial work to derive non- breeding abundance objectives and developed an updated approach. Although Fleming et al. (2017) made use of the least biased and most geographically consistent datasets, they identified outstanding issues to be resolved before the derivation technique could be effectively applied across all regions of North America. We updated the work of Fleming et al. (2017) by addressing 3 of those issues.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Waterfowl Population Status Survey
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 Waterfowl Population Status, 2019 August 19, 2019 In the United States the process of establishing hunting regulations for waterfowl is conducted annually. This process involves a number of scheduled meetings in which information regarding the status of waterfowl is presented to individuals within the agencies responsible for setting hunting regulations. In addition, the proposed regulations are published in the Federal Register to allow public comment. This report includes the most current breeding population and production information available for waterfowl in North America and is a result of cooperative eforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Canadian Wildlife Service (CWS), various state and provincial conservation agencies, and private conservation organizations. In addition to providing current information on the status of populations, this report is intended to aid the development of waterfowl harvest regulations in the United States for the 2020–2021 hunting season. i Acknowledgments Waterfowl Population and Habitat Information: The information contained in this report is the result of the eforts of numerous individuals and organizations. Principal contributors include the Canadian Wildlife Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, state wildlife conservation agencies, provincial conservation agencies from Canada, and Direcci´on General de Conservaci´on Ecol´ogica de los Recursos Naturales, Mexico. In addition, several conservation organizations, other state and federal agencies, universities, and private individuals provided information or cooperated in survey activities. Appendix A.1 provides a list of individuals responsible for the collection and compilation of data for the “Status of Ducks” section of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT of MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES for MALLARD and CANVASBACK Region 6
    • l ... I .....1 r v DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR MALLARD AND CANVASBACK Region 6 Materials used in support of presentation by Robert L. Croft at Project Leader's Meeting January 18, 1983 . -- • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Di stri buti on 1 Statement of Reponsibilities 1 Supply and Demand Mallard 4 Canvasback 5 Objectives Mallard 5 Canvasback 5 Definition of Problems Mallard 6 Canvasback 6 Analysis of Causes and Consequences Mallard 6 Canvasback 10 Description of Strategy Elements Habitat Development 12 Habitat Development off Service Lands 15 Management of Predation 17 Increase High Protein Foods (Service Refuges Only) 20 Habitat Preservation 20 Population Surveys 23 Research and Development 24 Disease Management 25 FWS Administration 26 Preliminary Screening 27 Characteristics of Affected Publics 28 Sources of Information 28 DEVELOPMENT OF MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR MALLARD AND CANVASBACK INTRODUCTION This paper summarizes accomplishments from Regional Resource Planning efforts concerning the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos platyrhynchos) and the canvasback (Aythya valisineria) due~ The purpose is to provide a bases for developing four or five strategies to test, using the Mallard Management Model, for accomplishing the population objectives for mallards and canvasbacks in Region 6. To develop these strategies, a list and description of potential strategy elements is given. Our intent is to identify all potential strategy elements regardless of their cost or practicability for use in developing the test strategies. We need your help to review and to add potential strategy elements (management techniques) to this list. There are approximately 25 times more breeding mallards than canvasbacks in Region 6. It is our judgement that public demand requires the mallard to be the lead species for strategy development.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Proposed Rule Making Public Safety Cougar Removals
    CR-102 (June 2004) PROPOSED RULE MAKING (Implements RCW 34.05.320) Do NOT use for expedited rule making Agency: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Preproposal Statement of Inquiry was filed as WSR 11-06-058 and WSR 11- Original Notice 10-083 ; or Supplemental Notice to WSR Expedited Rule Making--Proposed notice was filed as WSR ; or Continuance of WSR Proposal is exempt under RCW 34.05.310(4). Title of rule and other identifying information: (Describe Subject) WAC 232-12-243, Public safety cougar removals. WAC 232-28-272, 2009 Black bear and 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 cougar hunting seasons and regulations. WAC 232-28-287, 2009-2010, 2010-2011, and 2011-2012 Cougar permit seasons and regulations. WAC 232-28-435, 2011-12 Migratory waterfowl seasons and regulations. Hearing location(s): Submit written comments to: Natural Resources Building, Conference Room 172 Name: Wildlife Program Commission Meeting Public Comments 1111 Washington Street SE Address: 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia WA 98501-1091 Olympia, Washington 98504 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: (360) 902-2162 by (date) Wednesday, July 13, 2011 Date: August 5-6, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m. Assistance for persons with disabilities: Contact Susan Yeager by July 29, 2011 Date of intended adoption: August 5-6, 2011 TTY (800) 833-6388 or (360) 902-2267 (Note: This is NOT the effective date) Purpose of the proposal and its anticipated effects, including any changes in existing rules: See Attachment A Reasons supporting proposal: See Attachment A Statutory authority for adoption:
    [Show full text]
  • Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action Amend Sections 502 and 507 Title 14, California Code of Regulations Re: Waterfowl and Take of Migratory Birds
    State of California Fish and Game Commission Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action Amend Sections 502 and 507 Title 14, California Code of Regulations Re: Waterfowl and Take of Migratory Birds I. Dates of Statement of Reasons: Initial Statement of Reasons: November 13, 2019 Final Statement of Reasons: May 4, 2020 II. Dates and Locations of Scheduled Hearings (a) Notice Hearing Date: December 11, 2020 Location: Sacramento (b) Discussion Hearing Date: February 21, 2020 Location: Sacramento (c) Adoption Hearing Date: April 16, 2020 Location: Teleconference III. Update At its April 16, 2020 meeting, the Fish and Game Commission (Commission) adopted the specific season lengths and daily bag limits for the 2020-21 waterfowl hunting season as set forth in the attached Approved Regulatory Text, including a season closing date of January 31, 2021 in most zones. The Commission also adopted other minor editorial changes to clarify the regulations and to comply with the federal Frameworks. The originally proposed regulatory language in the Initial Statement of Reasons contained a range of season lengths and daily bag limits, which were contingent upon the establishment of federal Framework regulations. These frameworks were proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) in October and specify the maximum season lengths and daily bag limits. In addition, federal regulations require the North Coast Special Management Area late goose season dates to conform to the adjacent zone in Oregon and require the Colorado River Zone to conform to the adjacent zone in Arizona. Lastly, the Department modified the opening date for ducks and geese in the Northeastern Zone based on public and regional Department input.
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine National Wildlife Refuge: Wildlife List
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Valentine National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife List Wildlife Abounds Valentine National Wildlife Refuge Hackberry and Look for ducks and geese, especially in the Native (NWR), located 25 miles south of Pelican Lakes during the spring and fall. Watch for Prairie the town of Valentine, Nebraska, is pintail, mallard, ruddy, canvasback, 71,774 acres in size and was established and many more ducks. Take a walk in 1935 as a Refuge and breeding on the nature trail up to the old fire grounds for migratory birds and tower on the west end of Hackberry other wildlife. In fact, most of the Lake for a view of the Sandhills and wildlife present in historical times a look at grassland sparrows. This goose, are still present on the Refuge designed by J.N. today. Numerous wetlands, lakes, Duck Lake Look in the trees around the boat “Ding” Darling, wet meadows, and large expanses of ramp for they are an oasis for has become the native prairie attract a wide variety songbirds. Watch for warblers, blue symbol of the of wildlife. This brochure lists and black-headed grosbeaks, Lazuli National Wildlife 289 species of birds, 41 species of buntings, eastern bluebirds, and Refuge System. mammals, 16 species of reptiles, and many more. six species of amphibians that have been recorded on the Refuge. Check-list Key Sp Spring March – May S Summer June – August May, September, and October offer F Fall September – November good opportunities for observing a W Winter December – February variety of migratory birds. Spring migrants, including waterfowl and c common – present in large warblers, are most numerous in May.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Two Genetic Markers Used in the Identification of Diving
    Comparing two genetic markers used in the identification of diving ducks (Aythyinae) involved in birdstrikes Damani Eubanks, Carla Dove Ph.D, Faridah Dahlan, Sergei Drovetski Ph.D Abstract Results Knowing the species of birds involved in damaging collisions with U.S. military and civil aircraft (birdstrikes) is For our phylogenetic reconstruction we used 25 (16 new and 9 from GenBank) ND2 sequences and 51 (17 new and paramount to understanding and preventing human-wildlife conflicts in this field. The Feather Identification Lab, 34 from GenBank/BoLD) CO1 sequences. Although we were not able to sequence 3 samples for ND2 and for 2 Smithsonian Institution, identifies over 9,000 birdstrike cases each year using feather morphology and DNA samples for CO1, this indicates similar efficiency of ND2 and CO1 primers. barcoding. While the DNA barcode marker (CO1) is successful at identifying many species of birds, it falls short Genetic distances between closely related species in the ND2 tree were 1.8 - 5.3 times greater than those in the CO1 in species that are very closely related or hybridize frequently. This project tested the effectiveness of two tree (Fig. 1; Table 1). When number of segregating sites is considered, the differences are even greater due to the mitochondrial genetic markers, cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) used for differences in sequence length of the two markers. identifying species of waterfowl within the genus Aythya. Because these diving ducks are commonly involved in Both the differences in evolutionary rate and the sequence length between the two loci had a strong effect on posterior damaging birdstrikes, the most reliable method of DNA identification is needed for species designation of probability of monophyly of conspecific haplotypes.
    [Show full text]