DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Technical Report Golden Summit Project Preliminary Economic Assessment Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska USA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NI 43-101 Technical Report Golden Summit Project Preliminary Economic Assessment Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska USA FREEGOLD VENTURES LIMITED PO BOX 10351 SUITE 888 – 700 WEST GEORGIA STREET VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA V7Y 1G5 PHONE: (604) 662-7307 | FAX: (604) 662-3791 NI 43-101 Technical Report Golden Summit Project Preliminary Economic Assessment Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska USA Document: 910054-REP-R0001-01 RESOURCE EFFECTIVE DATE: MAY 31, 2013 REPORT EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 20, 2016 ISSUE DATE: MARCH 10, 2016 AMENDED AND RESTATED DATE: MAY 11, 2016 Prepared by List of Qualified Persons and Designations Mark J. Abrams, C.P.G. Jackie A. Blumberg, P.E. Gary H. Giroux, P.Eng. Chris Johns, P.Eng. Edwin C. Lips, P.E. Nick Michael, QP Dave M. Richers, QP, PG Vicki J. Scharnhorst, P.E., LEED AP D. Erik Spiller, QP Keith Thompson, CPG, PG 350 Indiana Street, Suite 500, Golden, CO 80401 Phone: 303-217-5700 Fax: 303-217-5705 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 KEY OUTCOMES ............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & OWNERSHIP ............................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 HISTORY .......................................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 GEOLOGY & MINERALIZATION ........................................................................................................... 1-5 1.6 MINERAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.7 MINERAL PROCESSING & METALLURGICAL TESTING .......................................................................... 1-9 1.7.1 MINERAL PROCESSING ....................................................................................................... 1-9 1.7.2 METALLURGICAL TESTING .................................................................................................. 1-9 1.8 MINING METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 1-9 1.9 INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................... 1-10 1.10 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PERMITTING & SOCIAL OR COMMUNITY IMPACT ...................................... 1-12 1.11 CAPITAL & OPERATING COSTS ........................................................................................................ 1-12 1.11.1 CAPITAL COSTS ............................................................................................................... 1-12 1.11.2 OPERATING COSTS .......................................................................................................... 1-13 1.12 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 1-13 1.13 INTERPRETATIONS & CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 1-14 1.13.1 GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 1-14 1.13.2 MINING ............................................................................................................................ 1-14 1.13.3 GROUNDWATER HYDROGEOLOGY .................................................................................... 1-14 1.13.4 METALLURGY & PROCESS ................................................................................................ 1-15 1.13.5 ENVIRONMENTAL ............................................................................................................. 1-15 1.14 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 1-16 2.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 TERMS OF REFERENCE..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4 SOURCES OF INFORMATION & DATA .................................................................................................. 2-2 2.5 UNITS OF MEASURE ......................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.6 DETAILED PERSONAL INSPECTIONS ................................................................................................... 2-2 3.0 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS .............................................................................................................. 3-1 4.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ............................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 LOCATION ........................................................................................................................................ 4-1 4.2 CLAIMS & AGREEMENTS ................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 KEYSTONE CLAIMS............................................................................................................. 4-5 4.2.2 TOLOVANA CLAIMS ............................................................................................................. 4-5 4.2.3 NEWSBOY CLAIMS ............................................................................................................. 4-6 4.2.4 GREEN CLAIMS .................................................................................................................. 4-6 4.2.5 CHATHAM CLAIMS .............................................................................................................. 4-7 May 2016 i 4.2.6 ALASKA MENTAL HEALTH TRUST AUTHORITY LAND ............................................................. 4-7 4.2.7 FORMER FAIRBANKS EXPLORATION CLAIMS ........................................................................ 4-8 5.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ......... 5-1 5.1 ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 CLIMATE .......................................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 LOCAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 5-1 5.4 PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................................................................................................ 5-1 6.0 HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 7.0 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION ..................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 REGIONAL, DISTRICT & PROPERTY GEOLOGY ................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY.......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.2 FAIRBANKS DISTRICT GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.3 GOLDEN SUMMIT PROJECT GEOLOGY................................................................................. 7-3 7.2 MINERALIZATION .............................................................................................................................. 7-6 7.2.1 INSTRUSIVE-HOSTED SULFIDE-QUARTZ VEINLETS ............................................................... 7-8 7.2.2 AURIFEROUS QUARTZ VEINS .............................................................................................. 7-8 7.2.3 SHEAR-HOSTED VEINLET ZONES ........................................................................................ 7-9 8.0 DEPOSIT TYPES ......................................................................................................................................... 8-1 9.0 EXPLORATION ............................................................................................................................................ 9-1 10.0 DRILLING ................................................................................................................................................... 10-1 10.1 CHRISTINA PROSPECT .................................................................................................................... 10-9 11.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY ........................................................................ 11-1 11.1 1992–2004 ..................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Indicators for Arctic Mining
    SOCIAL INDICATORS FOR ARCTIC MINING ISER Working Paper 2011.2 Sharman Haley, Professor of Public Policy Nick Szymoniak, Matthew Klick, Andrew Crow and Tobias Schwoerer, Research Associates May 12, 2011 Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage, Alaska 99508 Abstract This paper reviews and assesses the state of the data to describe and monitor mining trends in the pan-Arctic. It constructs a mining index and discusses its value as a social impact indicator and discusses drivers of change in Arctic mining. The widely available measures of mineral production and value are poor proxies for economic effects on Arctic communities. Trends in mining activity can be characterized as stasis or decline in mature regions of the Arctic, with strong growth in the frontier regions. World prices and the availability of large, undiscovered and untapped resources with favorable access and low political risk are the biggest drivers for Arctic mining, while climate change is a minor and locally variable factor. Historical data on mineral production and value is unavailable in electronic format for much of the Arctic, specifically Scandinavia and Russia; completing the historical record back to 1980 will require work with paper archives. The most critically needed improvement in data collection and reporting is to develop comparable measures of employment: the eight Arctic countries each use different definitions of employment, and different methodologies to collect the data. Furthermore, many countries do not report employment by county and industry, so the Arctic share of mining employment cannot be identified. More work needs to be done to develop indicator measures for ecosystem service flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Auditor Credentials Form International Cyanide Management Code Audit
    Auditor Credentials Form International Cyanide Management Code Audit Facility Audited: Kinross Gold Corporation/ Tasiast Mauritanie Limited S.A. (TMLSA) – Tasiast Gold Mine Audit Date: 11 November to 18 November 2019 Lead Auditor Credentials Lead Auditor: Clinton Phaal – Practitioner Member, PIEMA Auditor Certification No.: 0024259 Certifying Organization Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA) Saracen House, Crusader Road City Office Park, Tritton Park Lincoln, LN6 7AS United Kingdom Phone: +44 1522 540069 Fax: +44 1522 540090 Email: [email protected] Lead Auditor Experience: Clinton Phaal, PIEMA – Ramboll UK Limited Year Type of Facility/Type of Audit Led Country 2019 Lead Auditor: On behalf of Kinross Gold Corporation, Ghana conducted an International Cyanide Management Code recertification audit of the Chirano Gold Mine located in south western Ghana. 2019 Lead Auditor: On behalf of Kinross Gold Corporation, USA conducted an International Cyanide Management Code recertification audit of the of Round Mountain Gold Corporation, Round Mountain Mine, Nevada. 2019 Eldorado Gold Corporation/Tüprag Metal Madencilik Sanayi Turkey ve Ticaret AS (Tüprag), Lead Auditor, recertification audit of Kışladağ Gold Mine 2019 On behalf of Georgian Manganese conducted Environmental Federation of Georgia Legislation Compliance Review of mining and processing facilities to prepare a lobby position for environmental liabilities in advance of Georgia acceding to EU legislation. 2016 Lead Auditor: On behalf of Chukotka Mining and Geological Chukotka, Russian Company and Kinross Gold Corporation, conducted an Federation International Cyanide Management Code recertification audit of the Kupol Gold Mine located in Russia. 1 Auditor Credentials Form International Cyanide Management Code Audit Year Type of Facility/Type of Audit Led Country 2016 Lead Auditor: On behalf of Kinross Gold Corporation, led an Ghana International Cyanide Management Code (ICMC) re- certification audit of the Chirano Gold Mine located in southwestern Ghana.
    [Show full text]
  • South Coast Air Quality Management District
    SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Preliminary Draft Staff Report Proposed Amended Rule 1407 – Control of Emissions of Arsenic, Cadmium, and Nickel from Non-Chromium Metal Melting Operations June 2019 Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Philip M. Fine, Ph.D. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Susan Nakamura Planning and Rules Manager Planning, Rule Development and Area Sources Michael Morris Author: Michael Morris – Planning and Rules Manager Contributors: John Anderson – Air Quality Analysis and Compliance Supervisor Jason Aspell – Enforcement Manager Yadira DeHaro-Hammock – Senior Air Quality Chemist Luke Eisenhardt – Air Quality Specialist Kennard Ellis – Air Quality Specialist (retired) Mike Garibay – Supervising Air Quality Engineer Marco Polo – Air Quality Engineer II Barbara Radlein – Program Supervisor Amanda Sanders – Supervising Air Quality Inspector Areio Soltani – Supervising Air Quality Inspector Paul Stroik – Air Quality Specialist Charles Tupac – Supervising Air Quality Engineer Uyen-Uyen Vo – Program Supervisor Bill Welch – Senior Air Quality Engineer Lisa Wong – Assistant Air Quality Specialist Reviewed by: Barbara Baird – Chief Deputy Counsel Stacey Pruitt – Senior Deputy District Counsel William Wong – Principal Deputy District Counsel SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT GOVERNING BOARD Chairman: DR. WILLIAM A. BURKE Speaker of the Assembly Appointee Vice Chairman: BEN BENOIT Council Member, Wildomar Cities of Riverside County MEMBERS: LISA BARTLETT Supervisor, Fifth District County of Orange JOE BUSCAINO Council Member, 15th District City of Los Angeles Representative MICHAEL A. CACCIOTTI Council Member, South Pasadena Cities of Los Angeles County/Eastern Region VANESSA DELGADO Senate Rules Committee Appointee JANICE HAHN Supervisor, Fourth District County of Los Angeles LARRY MCCALLON Mayor Pro Tem, Highland Cities of San Bernardino County JUDITH MITCHELL Mayor, Rolling Hills Estates Cities of Los Angeles County/Western Region V.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\Data\WP\F\199\199 Internet.Wpd
    Jonathan A. Hill, Bookseller, Inc. 325 West End Avenue, Apt. 10B New York City, New York, 10023-8145 Tel: 646 827-0724 Fax: 212 496-9182 E-mail: [email protected] Catalogue 199 Proofs Science, Medicine, Natural History, & Bibliography Selective Subject Index on Following Pages 8 JONATHAN A. HILL Selective Subject Index Aeronautics: 38 Agriculture: 78, 88 Alchemy: 19, 26, 27, 78 Americana: 35, 72, 82 Architecture: 17 Art: 9, 17 Artillery: 26, 27, 55, 86 Astrology: 82 Astronomy: 40, 44, 61, 62, 67, 70, 82 Auction Catalogues: 3-15, 63 Bibliography: 3-15, 29, 31, 33, 34, 39, 47, 51, 54, 57, 60, 63, 69, 71, 75, 76, 81, 83, 90, 98-100 Biography: 89 Biology: 30 Bookbinding: 57, 68 Botany: 35, 78, 83, 88, 91 Bridges: 49, 87 Canals: 49 Cartography: 20 Catalogues: 3-15, 29, 31, 33, 35, 39, 47, 51, 54, 63, 69, 71, 81, 83, 90, 99, 100 Ceramics: 9, 78 Chemistry: 1, 2, 19, 21, 22-24, 26, 27, 48, 53, 65, 66, 72, 74, 78, 85 Color Theory: 33 Comets: 70 Conchology: 13 Crystallography: 2 Dentistry: 58 Dibner items: 26, 27, 66 Dictionaries: 2, 47 Dyeing & Bleaching: 26, 27, 72, 94-96 Early Printed Books (before 1601): 1, 20, 26, 27, 79, 82, 92 Economics: 1, 16, 72, 80, 94-96 Electricity & Magnetism: 39, 40, 52, 55, 67, 70, 79 Engineering: 16, 18, 49, 72, 78, 87 Entomology: 30 Evolution: 30 Forests: 56 Gardens: 35, 78 CATALOGUE ONE HUNDRED & NINETY–NINE 9 Garrison-Morton items: 30 Gems: 78 Geology: 64. 78, 92 Geometry: 20 Glass: 26, 27, 93 History: 1, 17, 28, 80, 89 Hoover items: 18, 19, 64 Horology: 25, 37 Horticulture: 35 Hydraulics: 25, 41, 70, 78 Instruments:
    [Show full text]
  • A Transformed Business, Looking to the Future
    ACACIA MINING PLC A TraNSFORMED BUSINESS, LOOKING TO THE FUTURE AnnUal REPORT & AccOUNTS 2016 A nn U al RE P ORT & A cc OU N TS 2016 ACACIA MINING PLC The successful transformation of our business is nearly complete. Our strategy is yielding results and we can now begin to take a longer-term outlook. The future is bright for Acacia as we continue to unlock value through the following areas... …BY DEVELOPING OUR WOrld-class assets Underground mining with exciting potential For more information, visit our website: www.acaciamining.com p8 WHAT’S INSIDE STRATEGIC REPORT 2 GOVERNANCE 60 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 109 Group at a glance 2 Governance overview 60 Independent auditors’ report Chairman’s statement 4 Board of Directors 62 on the consolidated financial statements 109 Our business model 6 Executive Leadership Team 66 Consolidated financial statements 114 Developing our world-class assets 8 Corporate governance report 67 Notes to the consolidated Expanding our exploration footprint 10 Committee reports 72 financial statements 119 Enhancing our stakeholder relations 12 Remuneration report 77 Independent auditors’ report on the parent company financial statements 157 Our strategy 14 Other information 97 Parent company financial statements 159 Chief Executive’s review 16 Directors’ responsibilities statement 102 Notes to the parent company Market overview 22 Reserves and resources 103 financial statements 163 Key performance indicators 24 Risk management 28 Principal risks and uncertainties 30 SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION 174 Glossary of terms 174 Shareholder enquiries 180 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 34 Operating review 34 Financial review 46 Sustainability review 52 …BY EXPANDING …BY ENHANCING OUR EXplorAtion footprint OUR STAKEHOLDER RELATIONS Targeting more high-value Continuing to invest in discoveries across Africa unearthing Africa’s potential p10 p12 ACACIA MINING PLC AnnUAL Report & AccoUnts 2016 1 GROUP AT A GLANCE We are the leading gold producer in Tanzania with a vision of becoming a leading gold miner across Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska's Mineral Industry 1995: a Summary by T.K
    Alaska's Mineral Industry 1995: A Summary by T.K. Bundtzen, R.C. Swainbank, A.H. Clough, M.W. Henning, and K.M. Charlie Mine construction at the Fort Knox project. When the mine is in production in the fourth quarter of 1996, it will be Alaska's largest gold mine. Photo by R.C. Swainbank. PRODUCTZON4n 1995 production gross value EXPLORATION-Grass-roots exploration spending of Alaska's mineral industry increased 6 percent to increased 9 percent statewide to $34.0 million with th $539.5 million. Red Dog zinc, lead, and silver greatest increase in the Eastern Interior Region. mine became the world's largest producer of zinc. Gold production was down by 25 percent from EMPLOYMENT-With about 3,405 full-time- i 1994 levels. equivalent jobs, mineral industry employment was up 10 percent from 1994 levels. DEVELOPMENT--Expenditures reached $147.8 nullion in 1995, up 234 percent from 1993 levels. GOVERNMENT ACTIONS-Governor Knowles The main reasons for the increase were mine signed an exploration incentive bill. US.Bureau of expansion at Red Dog and mine construction at Mines was dissolved. Eleven firms received reclama- Fort Knox and Nixon Fork. tion awards. s INFORMATION CIRCULAR 41 Alaska Department of Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys March 1996 NATURAL ALASKA MINERAL INDUSTRY 1995: INTRODUCTION Table 1. Total value of the mineral industry in Alaska by year (in millions of dollars) This report summarizes mined industry activity of the 1995 calendar year. Much of the information it contains is based Exploration Development Production Total on a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) questionnaire 1981 sent to approximately 985 companies, individuals, and govern- 1982 ment agencies involved in mineral extractive industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Resource Data File, Fairbanks Quadrangle, Alaska
    Alaska Resource Data File, Fairbanks quadrangle, Alaska By Curtis J. Freeman1 and Janet Schaefer1 Open-File Report 01–426 2001 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1 Fairbanks, Alaska Fairbanks quadrangle Descriptions of the mineral occurrences shown on the accompanying figure fol- low. See U.S. Geological Survey (1996) for a description of the information content of each field in the records. The data presented here are maintained as part of a statewide database on mines, prospects and mineral occurrences throughout Alaska. o o o o o o o o Distribution of mineral occurrences in the Fairbanks 1:250,000-scale quadrangle, Alaska This and related reports are accessible through the USGS World Wide Web site http://ardf.wr.usgs.gov. Comments or information regarding corrections or missing data, or requests for digital retrievals should be directed to: Frederic Wilson, USGS, 4200 University Dr., Anchorage, AK 99508-4667, e-mail [email protected], telephone (907) 786-7448. This compilation is authored by: Curtis J. Freeman and Janet Schaefer Fairbanks, Alaska Alaska Resource Data File This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geologi- cal Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 27. Amend Rule 219 – Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant
    BOARD MEETING DATE: May 5, 2017 AGENDA NO. 27 PROPOSAL: Amend Rule 219 – Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II; and Amend Rule 222 – Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II SYNOPSIS: Proposed Amended Rule 219 will exempt certain categories of equipment from the requirement to obtain a written permit and remove existing exemptions for equipment that the SCAQMD has learned may not be able to demonstrate compliance with all SCAQMD rules, and will also provide clarification for sources or processes currently covered under Rule 219. Proposed Amended Rule 222 will add additional categories to the streamlined filing/registration program of Rule 222. Both proposed amendments will further facilitate the streamlining of the District’s permitting system. COMMITTEE: Stationary Source, March 17, 2017 and April 21, 2017 Reviewed RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Adopt the attached resolution: 1. Determining that the proposed amendments to Rule 219 - Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II, and Rule 222 - Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II, are exempt from requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; 2. Amending Rule 219 – Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II; and 3. Amending Rule 222 – Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II. Wayne Nastri Executive Officer PF:SN:TG:BG Background Rule 219 – Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II – identifies equipment, processes, and operations that emit small amounts of air contaminants or those where SCAQMD staff has determined that the particular source will meet requirements of existing SCAQMD rules and therefore a written permit is not needed.
    [Show full text]
  • NI 43-101 Updated Technical Report Pan Gold Project White Pine County, Nevada
    NI 43-101 Updated Technical Report Pan Gold Project White Pine County, Nevada Effective Date: June 30, 2017 Report Date: July 7, 2017 Report Prepared for And GRP Minerals Corp. Fiore Exploration Ltd 8310 South Valley Highway Suite 3123, Suite 180 595 Burrard Street Englewood, Colorado 80112 Vancouver, BC V7X 1J1 Report Prepared by SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. 5250 Neil Road, Suite 300 Reno, NV 89502 SRK Project Number: 493800.050 Signed by Qualified Persons: J. B. Pennington, M.Sc., C.P.G. Kent Hartley, P.E. Justin Smith, P.E., RM-SME. Deepak Malhotra, RM-SME Valerie Sawyer, RM-SME Brooke J. Miller, M.Sc., C.P.G. Reviewed by: John Tinucci, PhD, PE SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc. NI 43-101 Updated Technical Report – Pan Project, NV Page ii Table of Contents 1 Summary ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Property Description and Ownership .................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Geology and Mineralization ................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Status of Exploration, Development and Operations .......................................................................... 3 1.3.1 Status of Operations and Development .................................................................................. 3 1.3.2 Restarting Pan and Achieving Commercial Production .......................................................... 3 1.3.3
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Mining and Preconcentration Systems for Nickel Sulfide Ores Trent William Weatherwax
    INTEGRATED MINING AND PRECONCENTRATION SYSTEMS FOR NICKEL SULFIDE ORES by TRENT WILLIAM WEATHERWAX BS Michigan Technological University, 2003 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Mining Engineering) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA December, 2007 © Trent William Weatherwax, 2007 Abstract As part of a strategic research initiative at UBC to design and evaluate integrated underground mining and mineral processing systems, work has been done to determine how to utilize the coarse rejects of pre-concentration in the underground environment. An amenability study for nine orebodies from four of Xstrata Nickel’s Ontario operations evaluated both processing and waste disposal methods. Metallurgically the orebodies showed amenability to dense media separation and conductivity sorting. The dense media results showed high mass rejections and high metal recoveries for all nine orebodies. Conductivity sorter results were not as consistent, but still showed good results. Dense media rejects were examined to determine the applicability of their use in rockfills and composite minefills. The geotechnical properties indicated that the rejects would provide a competent material for minefills. The mix designs were examined for both strength and rheological properties and showed that fills utilizing rejects were comparable to fills currently used by industry. Composite fills containing rejects had significantly lower void ratios, decreasing cement requirements for a given strength requirement. Conceptual designs for pre-concentration systems based on the metallurgical, reject characterization, and mix design were developed for each of the four mines in the study. The designs took into consideration the current mining plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Isakidd™ – 2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Contents
    2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Long the benchmark in the industry, IsaKidd™ accounts for over 13.6 mtpa of copper production from over 116 licensees world wide, including Glencore’s own operations. We provide clients with a comprehensive range of technology, process support and core equipment to ensure long term operational and economic success.” IsaKidd™ at a Glance > IsaKidd™ Technology is focused on delivering quality products and services to its customers whilst continuously working on technical innovations and developments to address the ever changing needs of the market. > Since development and commercialisation in the early 1980s, both ISA and KIDD technologies have undergone continuous improvement and today are regarded as the benchmark technologies for high intensity copper electro-refining and electro-winning operations. > Significant advancements have been achieved with both the stainless steel cathode technology and the electrode handling equipment used in copper tankhouses. For more: [email protected] Tel +61 7 3833 8500 IsaKidd™ – 2020 Compendium of Technical Papers Contents Copper Refinery Modernisation, Mopani Copper Mines Plc, Mufulira, Zambia ................................................................................................................... 2 Mount Isa Mines Necessity Driving Innovation ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Current Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Operational Excellence…
    Annual Report & Accounts 2013 STRATEGIC REPORT STRATEGIC Driving operational excellence… Annual Report and Accounts 2013 3 STRATEGIC REPORT Group at a glance 1 … through a sharper focus Chairman’s statement 2 Chief Executive Of!cer’s report 4 on asset optimisation Strategy and business model 6 Year in review 8 Operational Review 10 & tighter control of Senior leadership 12 Outlook 13 costs we are creating Key performance indicators 14 Operating review 16 Exploration review 22 a stronger business Financial review 25 Corporate responsibility 34 GOVERNANCE Forward-looking statements Letter from the Chairman 38 This Annual Report includes “forward-looking statements” that express or imply expectations of future events or results. Forward-looking statements are statements that Board of Directors 39 are not historical facts. These statements include, without limitation, !nancial projections Senior management 42 and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future production, operations, costs, projects, and Corporate governance report 44 statements regarding future performance. Forward-looking statements are generally Committee reports 49 identi!ed by the words “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates” and other similar expressions. All forward-looking statements involve a Remuneration report 56 number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of ABG, which could cause actual results and developments to
    [Show full text]