Coastal Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coastal Management INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island Narragansett, Rhode Island USA • #40 • Fall 2001 FOCUS ON: Coastal Management: In Search of Success By William Matuszeski health of the coastal resources Baltic Sea. But, little has actually been here are now a great many themselves.These kinds of results written up for the professional audi- IN SEARCH OF SUCCESS COASTAL MANAGEMENT: COASTAL Tcoastal management efforts are fewer and more difficult to pin ence on how these places have been underway throughout the world. down. saved. As your Guest Editor, I have These undertakings have resulted in This issue of InterCoast seeks out only limited overseas experience and many studies, new institutions, and success stories and tries to explain contacts. So I found it easiest to draw Highlights commitments to bring change. what made them happen. It draws upon friends and colleagues here in Especially where integrated coastal heavily upon experience in the the US to put their experiences to 4 USA to Thailand: management has been tried across a United States.This is not because paper. Transferring range of issues, agencies and inter- there are no success stories else- The result is a set of articles in this Lessons Learned ests, there have been ongoing where.We all know of progress in issue by remarkably talented practi- efforts to evaluate success. But, the coastal resource restoration and tioners—people who almost never 6 Tampa Bay, USA ultimate measures of success must protection being made worldwide have the time to sit down and write be the recovery and sustained from the Great Barrier Reef to the out what happened and why. I know (continued page 2) 8 Singapore River and the Kallang Basin Chesapeake Bay, USA: Lessons 10 Cuyahoga River, USA Learned from Managing a Watershed By Ann Pesiri Swanson effort is designed to work within The Chesapeake Bay 12 he Chesapeake Bay is the the highly participatory framework The Chesapeake Bay has often been Boston Harbor, largest and most productive USA T of the American democratic cul- referred to as the “crown jewel” of the estuary in the United States and ture. Multiple players are involved United States’ 850 estuaries. Located among the most productive in the 14 at every stage of the restoration midway along the east coast of the Puget Sound, USA world. Efforts to restore the process including various levels of United States, it extends 180 miles Chesapeake Bay are now more than government, private citizens, and (290 km) from the tidal reaches at the 16 two decades old, and there are businesses.The lessons outlined in mouth of the Susquehanna River in San Francisco Bay, many lessons we have learned.This this paper are put forth with trans- Maryland to Cape Charles,Virginia, USA paper is intended to highlight some ferability in mind. Some may be where it meets the Atlantic Ocean. It of these lessons and to identify directly transferable to similar cuts across virtually the entire north- some of the successes experienced restoration efforts elsewhere in the south length of two states—Maryland Theme in the effort to manage the bay as a world. Others may need to be and Virginia— helping to define their Advisor: single ecosystem, including all of modified in order to work within landscape, their cultures, and their its waters and the land that defines the ecological, cultural, or political economies. William its watershed. framework of a given region or As an estuarine system, the Matuszeski The Chesapeake Bay restoration country. Chesapeake Bay is highly complex. (continued page 28) Matuszeski about restoring the underwater (continued from page 1) grassbeds in Tampa Bay. this because it was difficult to get An overseas success story comes many of them to do it for you. INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETTER OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT from Singapore, where L.M. Chou These are folks who are accus- Executive Editor: outlines how a coordinated govern- Stephen B. Olsen tomed to being in the field—out ment effort cleaned up the Editor: Noëlle F. Lewis there making things happen. I hope Singapore River and the Kallang Designer: Matt Castigliego you will join me in thanking them Basin. A great many difficult deci- InterCoast is an internat- for taking time out to tell their sions had to be made and many ional newsletter of coastal stories. people had to change their liveli- management, published three We start with Chesapeake Bay, hoods and their lifestyles, but a times each year by the Coastal the place I am most familiar with. I clear action plan and broad support Resources Management counted Ann Swanson among my brought measurable results. Project of the University of closest and most capable colleagues Back in the states, we look at Rhode Island's Coastal during the decade I spent with the two infamous examples of pollu- Resources Center (CRC) and Bay Program.The Chesapeake is tion where there were concerted the U.S. Agency for America’s largest estuary, and International Development efforts and major turnarounds.The worldwide is exceeded in size only Cuyahoga River in Cleveland is (USAID). Funding to publish by the Ob in northern Siberia.The InterCoast is provided by right up there with the Santa Chesapeake Bay Program is the USAID's Global Environment Barbara Oil Spill as a touchstone Center and the National granddaddy of US coastal restora- for the awakening of America’s Institute for Coastal and tion efforts, and the issues it deals environmental consciousness.This Marine Mangement,The with are as vast as its enormous was the river that was so polluted Netherlands. watershed and as complex as the it caught fire and burned in 1969. InterCoast’s objective is to interactions in its 700,000 acres Since then, it has seen a remarkable facilitate information exchange (280,000 hectares) of shallows. recovery.This past summer at the on coastal management issues. Ann’s article captures the key les- Coastal Zone ‘01 Conference in Readers are invited to contact sons from 25 years of intensive Cleveland, US, I sat in an outdoor Noëlle F. Lewis with contribu- management efforts. restaurant on the river in down- tions, questions, and com- Donna Nickerson’s piece ments. town Cleve-land, dining on Great explains how the US National Lakes seafood with friends and InterCoast Estuary Program (NEP) grew out watching the yachts go by. Coastal Resources Center of the Chesapeake Bay effort and University of Rhode Island The other remarkable comeback expanded to eventually encompass has been Boston Harbor.As recent- Narragansett, Rhode Island one-third of the nation’s estuaries. 02882 USA ly as 1988, the waters were so pol- Tel:401 874-6870 She goes on to provide a set of luted that they were an issue in the Fax: 401 789-4670 insights on how the NEP model presidential election campaign. E-mail: [email protected] and experience was applied to a Since then, there has been massive Website:www.crc.uri.edu bay in Thailand, with measurable investment of public funds to InterCoast's policy is to positive results. rebuild the sewage treatment sys- limit submissions to a short Next we turn to Tampa Bay tem of the metropolitan area. Rich essay or summary.The editor Program in Florida.This is a NEP Delaney’s article explains how it all routinely edits submissions with a comprehensive restoration happened and the results so far.The heavily and removes refer- plan, and they have taken the lead ences. Such changes are com- lesson here is that coastal cleanups on a range of issues, including the in urban areas have to deal with the monly made without further impact of deposition of air pollu- consultation with the author. basics of human sewage, and the tants on the water and the living solutions are not cheap. resources of the bay.We asked Keeping finance in mind, we Holly Greening, the Program’s next learn about Puget Sound in Chief Scientist, to take a specific Washington State, one of the first issue and demonstrate how goals NEP to complete its conservation were set and results achieved. She and management plan.We asked has provided us with a myriad of Nancy McKay to focus on how insights related to how they went (continued page 40) 2 InterCoast • Fall 2001 OCEANS AND COASTS AT RIO+10 TOWARDSTHE 2002 WORLD SUMMIT ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT,JOHANNESBURG ASSESSING PROGRESS,ADDRESSING CONTINUING AND NEW CHALLENGES PARIS,FRANCE DECEMBER 3-7, 2001 Background It has been almost a decade since many important new agreements on oceans and coasts were adopted at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro (United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED)), including Chapter 17 of Agenda 21, and the oceans-related aspects of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Since that time, too, the United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea has come into force, and several modifications to the con- vention—related to straddling stocks and to deep-seabed mining— have been adopted.There has been much investment in the management of coastal and marine areas by national and international donors, and the number of nations undertaking coastal and ocean management has increased significantly. International entities have done extensive work in providing guidance for sustainable development of coastal and marine resources, and national governments and communities are increasingly experimenting with models of management emphasizing sustainable development, integration, and the precautionary approach. Purpose The Global Conference on Oceans and Coasts at Rio+10:Assessing Progress,Addressing Continuing and New Challenges, to be held at UNESCO headquarters in Paris on December 3 through 7, 2001, is intended to provide an overall assessment of progress achieved on oceans and coasts since the Earth Summit and to provide input to the discussions by governments which will take place in Septemeber 2002 when nations around the world will converge at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (Rio+10) in Johannesburg, South Africa, to assess progress made in the implementation of all aspects of the world agenda on envi- ronment and development agreed to at the 1992 Earth Summit.
Recommended publications
  • Kallang River to Be Rejuvenated
    Kallang River to Be Rejuvenated On 29 March, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) launched a new exhibition titled “A River Runs Through It”. This exhibition is a call for public feedback on a preliminary conceptual plan to improve connectivity along the 14km­long Kallang River, and to revitalise the areas around it. Minister for National Development and Second Minister for Finance Mr Lawrence Wong officiated at the launch of the exhibition. Potential for Rejuvenation Aerial view of possible enhancements along the Kallang River The Kallang River is Singapore’s longest natural river. Originating from Lower Peirce Reservoir, the river passes through many housing and industrial areas such as Ang Mo Kio, Bishan, Toa Payoh, Bendemeer, and Kallang Bahru before merging into the Kallang Basin. Some 800,000 people now live within 2km of the Kallang River. Over the next 20 years, there is potential to introduce another 100,000 dwelling units into the area. Waterfront rejuvenation started in the 1980s in Singapore, following the clean­up of both the Singapore River and the Kallang Basin. Over the past 30 years, the government has focused on the Singapore River, Marina Bay, and the Kallang Basin. The time is ripe to begin discussions about the further rejuvenation of the Kallang River. URA also hopes to upgrade underpasses and to build new ones in the area, including one under Sims Avenue that would help connect Kallang MRT station to the Singapore Sports Hub. Pedestrian crossings at Serangoon Road and Bendemeer Road are also expected to be widened to facilitate cycling. The existing CTE crossing could be widened and deepened for a more conducive environment for active mobility Currently, cyclists travelling along the Kallang River face several obstacles, including an 83­step climb with their bicycles up a pedestrian overhead bridge across the Pan­Island Expressway (PIE) and a 47­ step descent on the other side.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2016 School Holidays Sports Programmes (East)
    CHILDREN’S PROGRAMME AGE VENUE DAY / TIME DATE FEE SESSION(S) PARENT & CHILD PROGRAMME AGE VENUE DAY / TIME DATE FEE SESSION(S) Scuba Rangers Basic Wushu Workshop – Learn and experience: Parent & Child – Familiarisation with the This programme helps to underwater breathing develop a strong bond between 6 – 14 apparatus parent and child through years Pasir Ris Sports Centre Sat 2.00pm - 3.30pm 19 Mar $20/pair 1 – Getting yourself comfortable learning the basics of Wushu old breathing underwater that aim to build strength, – Learn basic underwater 6 – 14 balance, agility and flexibility. hand signals years Tampines Sports Centre Thur 9.00am – 10.30am 17 Mar $80 1 old – Demonstration of diving skills, Basketball – such as regulator clearing, Parent & Child NEW! retrieval, mask clearing and Parent and child can experience much more the joy in training and participating through a game of 3 – 12 Just bring your swimsuit and we basketball – a great opportunity years Pasir Ris Sports Centre Sat 3.00pm - 5.00pm 12 Mar $90/pair 1 will provide you with the rest of to live better through sports! old the equipment. Attire: Sports attire and sports shoes SG Basketball Participants will be brought 4 – 12 through a series of drills like FUN Start MOVE Smart! years Pasir Ris Sports Centre Fri 9.30am – 12.30pm 18 Mar $65 1 strength and conditioning, and old Parent & Child Workshop competitive play. Have fun with your child while 3 – 10 engaging them in physical Katong years Sat 11.00am – 1.00pm 12 Mar $30 1 activities designed to sharpen Swimming Complex Squash Camp old their fundamental movement Participants will learn the 13 – 17 skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation Slides
    Investor Presentation August 2011 Agenda 1 Overview of Mapletree Industrial Trust 2 Portfolio Highlights 3 Capital Structure 4 1Q FY2011 Financial Performance 5 Acquisition of JTC Assets 6 Summary 1 Overview of Mapletree Industrial Trust Overview of Mapletree Industrial Trust Public & Inst Sponsor Mapletree Investments Pte Ltd (“MIPL”) MIPL Unitholders Owns 30% of MIT 70% 30% Investment Focused on income producing real estate in Trustee mandate Singapore primarily used for industrial purposes, excluding properties primarily used for logistics purposes Manager Portfolio1 81 properties valued at S$2.6 billion 1.8 million sq m GFA Property 1.3 million sq m NLA Portfolio Manager Manager Mapletree Industrial Trust Management Ltd. • 3 Business Park Buildings 100% owned by the Sponsor • 64 Flatted Factories 2 Property Mapletree Facilities Services Pte. Ltd. (Grouped into 27 clusters ) Manager 100% owned by the Sponsor • 7 Stack-up / Ramp-up Buildings (Grouped into 1 cluster2) Trustee DBS Trustee Limited • 6 Light Industrial Buildings3 • 1 Warehouse 1 Includes Acquisition Portfolio of 8 JTC Flatted Factories and 3 Amenity Centres as announced on 2 July 2011 2 A property “cluster” consists of one or more individual buildings situated on the same land lot or adjoining land lots 3 Includes 26 Woodlands Loop, which is a property comprising 3 individual buildings 3 Key Milestones Achieved in 1st Year 21 October 2010 S$1.188 billion raised via Initial Public Offering on SGX Mainboard • Institutional Subscription of 39.6x 27 Jul 2011 • Public Offer Subscription of 27.7x 26 Jul 2011 Launch of Successful 1Q FY2011 S$177 mil Equity 1 Jul 2011 DPU 1.98 cents Fund Raising Award of JTC Portfolio worth Placement 26 Mar 2011 S$400.3 mil 13X Subscribed Preferential Offering 4Q FY2011 1.6X Covered DPU 1.93 cents 26 Jan 2011 First Financial Results Achieves DPU 1.52 cents 4 81 Properties Spanning 4 Key Property Types • One of the largest industrial landlords in Singapore • Total assets of approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Faqs for Resumption of Sport & Physical Exercise and Activity For
    FAQs For Resumption Of Sport And Physical Exercise & Activity For Phase Two (“Safe Transition”) (as of 18 Jun 20) FAQs FOR RESUMPTION OF SPORT AND PHYSICAL EXERCISE & ACTIVITY FOR PHASE TWO (“SAFE TRANSITION”) A. General Public Qn: Am I still allowed to exercise outdoors? Ans: Individuals can engage in sport and physical activity either alone or in a group of no more than 5 participants. For organised programmes and classes, an additional coach or instructor is allowed and will not be part of the group size of 5. A physical distancing of 2m (i.e. 2 arms-length) must be maintained when exercising or playing sport in general, while participants involved in indoor high intensity or high movement physical exercises such as Zumba and Piloxing, must maintain a physical distance of 3m (i.e. 3 arms-length) apart. Contact sports is permitted if they are modified to avoid extensive body contact. Groups that are sharing a space must not interact and must maintain a distance of 3m apart at all times. Masks must be worn when not engaged in strenuous activities. Senior-centric1 activities are allowed in Phase Two, limited for now to activities that can be done individually, with safe management measures in place and no sharing of equipment between participants. Qn: Am I allowed to exercise with my family members (those who stay with me) outdoors? Ans: Individuals can exercise outdoors with their family members, but group activities and exercise must be kept to no more than 5 participants. An additional coach/instructor is allowed and will not be part of the group size of 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore's Reclamation Story
    BIBLIOASIA APR – JUN 2017 Vol. 13 / Issue 01 / Feature Lim Tin Seng is a Librarian with the National (Facing page) Aerial photograph of ongoing reclamation work in Tuas. Photo by Richard W. J. Koh. All rights Library, Singapore. He is the co-editor of reserved, Koh, T. (2015). Over Singapore (pp. 108–109). Singapore: Editions Didier Millet. Roots: Tracing Family Histories – A Resource (Below) This lithograph (c. 1850) by Lieutenant Edwin Augustus Porcher from the British Royal Navy Guide (2013), Harmony and Development: shows the view as seen from South Boat Quay, where Singapore’s first reclamation took place in 1822. ASEAN-China Relations (2009) and Courtesy of the National Museum of Singapore, National Heritage Board. (Bottom) Named after George Chancellor Collyer, then Chief Engineer of the Straits Settlements, Collyer China’s New Social Policy: Initiatives for Quay was built on reclaimed land by convict labour and completed in 1864. Courtesy of National Archives a Harmonious Society (2010). He is also a of Singapore. LAND regular contributor to BiblioAsia. FROM Over the past two centuries, Singapore’s land area has expanded by a whopping 25 percent – from 58,150 to 71,910 hectares (or 578 to 719 sq km).1 This gradual increase in land surface is not because of tectonic movements or divine intervention, but SAND orather the miracle of a man-made engi- Singapore’s Reclamation Story neering feat known as land reclamation. The quest for land is as old as time immemorial; one of the reasons nations go to war is to gain new territory to sup- port a growing population.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.SG Unhabitat Ilugp Integrated Master Planning and Development
    INTEGRATED MASTER PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SG UNHabitat iLUGP Speaker Michael Koh Fellow, Centre for Liveable Cities Singapore Liveability Framework Outcomes of Liveability 1. High Quality of Life 2. Competitive Economy 3. Sustainable Environment Singapore Liveability Framework Principles of Integrated Master Planning and Development 1. Think long term 2. “Fight productively” 3. Build in flexibility 4. Execute effectively 5. Innovate systematically Outline Principles of Integrated Master Planning and Development 01 Concept Plan 02 Master Plan 03 Integrated Transport Planning 04 Urban Design Controls 05 Conservation Concept Plan 01 Concept Plan 02 Master Plan 03 Integrated Transport Planning 04 Urban Design Controls 05 Conservation Planning and Development Framework CONCEPT PLAN Maps out strategic vision over the next 40-50 years MASTER PLAN Guides development over the next 10-15 years LAND SALES & DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION CONTROL Concept Plan Review Process Identify long term land requirements (including Phase 1 planning assumptions, standards and projections) and key planning policies for all land use types Formulate and design structure plans and Phase 2 development strategies Phase 3 Traffic modelling, plan evaluation and refinement Phase 4 Monitoring and update of concept plan Concept Planning Framework & Strategic Planning Components POPULATION PROJECTIONS 8 CRITICAL AREAS Integrator: URA INDUSTRY [MTI/JTC] COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT LAND SUPPLY [EDB] INFRASTRUCTURE [PUB] CONSTRAINTS ENVIRONMENT [NEA] RECREATION [NPARKS] HOUSING
    [Show full text]
  • 2,217 Tenants 20.1 Million Sq Ft 86 Properties
    STRATEGIC LOCATIONS 2.6% ACROSS SINGAPORE 12.1% Portfolio Value 15.1% Mapletree Industrial Trust’s S$3,748.7 41.4% diverse portfolio of industrial properties Million As at 31 March 2017 Diverse Portfolio of Large Tenant Base of Total GFA of is located in established industrial Flatted Factories Hi-Tech Buildings Business Park Buildings 86 Properties 2,217 Tenants 20.1 Million Sq Ft estates and business parks with good 28.8% Stack-up/Ramp-up Buildings transportation infrastructure. Light Industrial Buildings Property Clusters1 CAUSEWAY TO MALAYSIA FLATTED FACTORIES 3836 1 Chai Chee Lane 13 Kolam Ayer 1 4141 2 Changi North 14 Kolam Ayer 2 3 Clementi West 15 Kolam Ayer 5 3234 4 Kaki Bukit 16 Loyang 1 5 Kallang Basin 1 17 Loyang 2 WOODLANDS 6 Kallang Basin 2 18 Redhill 1 REGIOGIONAL 7 Kallang Basin 3 19 Redhill 2 CENTRE 8 Kallang Basin 4 20 Tanglin Halt 9 Kallang Basin 5 21 Tiong Bahru 1 10 Kallang Basin 6 22 Tiong Bahru 2 11 Kampong Ampat 23 Toa Payoh North 2 12 Kampong Ubi 24 Toa Payoh North 3 28 27 29 31 HI-TECH BUILDINGS Serangoon Looyyang SNeorrathngoon 1166 17 North 25 1 and 1A Depot Close2 TAMPIPINENES 26 19 Tai Seng Drive TUATUAS REGIOGIONAL 265 2 CENTRE 27 26A Ayer Rajah Crescent SECOND 39 22 AIRPORRPORT JURONG LALAKE Toa Payoh 37 28 30A Kallang Place3 LINK DISTRICT North Kampong 3229 2323 3331 29 K&S Corporate Headquarters 2424 Ampat Changi 1111 North 4 4 30 Mukim 06 Lot 00869CPT 1133 12 40 31 Serangoon North 15 4240 KakiKaki Bukukit 35 38 3436 CChahnagngi i 33 32 Tata Communications Exchange 3537 Kolam Business 1144 Kampong 1 Business
    [Show full text]
  • Capitaland Launches Riveredge Condominium in Tanjong Rhu 135-Unit Development Will Feature Sky Terrace with Views of Kallang Basin
    For immediate release 2 November 2005 NEWS RELEASE CapitaLand launches RiverEdge condominium in Tanjong Rhu 135-unit development will feature sky terrace with views of Kallang Basin Singapore, 2 November 2005 – CapitaLand will officially launch the 135-unit RiverEdge condominium (水秀轩) this Saturday, 5 November 2005, at an average price of S$590 per square foot. Located in the prime Tanjong Rhu residential area, the 99-year leasehold riverfront development is targeted at families and investors who appreciate its close proximity to good schools, MRT connections and the future Marina Bay integrated resort development. For the phase one launch, a total of 77 units will be released. The condominium is a joint venture development by CapitaLand (45%); OKS Capital (45%), a Singapore vehicle backed by Middle Eastern investment interests; and Ghim Li Holdings (10%). CapitaLand is the lead project manager for the development. This is CapitaLand’s third residential launch this year, following strong sales achieved for two other developments released in the first half of 2005 - RiverGate and Tanglin Residences. At the 545-unit RiverGate, 70% of the 370 units launched have been sold. This includes the purchase of 100 units by Ferrell Premier Real Estate Investment Fund for a total of S$182.3 million. Similarly, the 43-unit Tanglin Residences saw strong buyer response, especially from foreign homebuyers. The apartments are fully sold and only a few townhouses, valued at approximately S$5 million each, are available. Ms Patricia Chia, CEO of CapitaLand Residential Singapore, said: “We are confident of keen buyer interest in RiverEdge due to positive public sentiments arising from a stronger economy and the recent changes to regulations on property purchases.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Facilities Sports Hall Roof at Geylang East Swimming Complex Unconventional Steel Structures
    Auditorium Roof at Singapore Sports School Swimming Pool Roof at Singapore Sports School sports facilities Sports Hall Roof at Geylang East Swimming Complex unconventional steel structures Our firm has designed many sports facilities Each design is specifically tailored to meet with unconventional steel structures, such as both the client’s requirements and the the roofs to the Bishan Stadium, Jalan Besar objective of achieving an aesthetic and yet Stadium and Singapore Sports School. They buildable, efficient and economical are usually the more exciting part of the structure, in order to give our clients the best Grandstand Roof at overall civil and structural design package. overall project value. Tampines Swimming Complex AWARD •Structural Steel Design Award 2002 •Merit for Structural Steel Design Award 2004 •Merit at URA’s Southern Ridge Bridge Design Competition 2004 Main Grandstand Roof at Jalan Besar Stadium Click here to visit our website Sports Hall Roof at Bishan Sport Complex our clients and projects SINGAPORE SPORTS COUNCIL • Singapore Sports School Grandstand Roof at Bishan Sport Complex • Bishan Sport Complex • Jalan Besar Stadium • Additions & Alterations to Tampines Swimming Complex • Additions & Alterations to Geylang East Swimming Complex • Deck reconstruction @ Kallang Basin Swimming Pool • Additions & Alterations to National Stadium • Additions & Alterations to Bishan Stadium • Additions & Alterations to Hougang Sports Hall • Sailing Centre at Seletar Country Club • Breakwater at the National Sailing Centre Swimming Pools Roof at Singapore Sports School Sports Hall Roof at Geylang East Swimming Complex Click here to visit our website ALBERT LOH consultants steel structures specialist 170 Upper Bukit T i m a h R o a d # 1 9 - 02 B u k i t T i m a h Shopping Centre Singapore 588179 Tel: +65 64698788 Fax: +65 64696306 E m a i l : [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Property Portfolio
    MAPLETREE ANNUAL REPORT 38. INDUSTRIAL TRUST 2015/2016 STRATEGIC DIRECTION | PEOPLE | PORTFOLIO | GOVERNANCE | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 39. PROPERTY PORTFOLIO FLATTED FACTORIES KEY STATISTICS (AS AT 31 MARCH 2016) Flatted Factories comprise high-rise multi-tenanted buildings. Standard units NUMBER OF GROSS FLOOR PROPERTIES AREA range from 1,000 sq ft to 10,000 sq ft, sharing naturally ventilated corridors 57 10,734,350 and lift lobbies. Other common facilities (GROUPED INTO 24 CLUSTERS) SQ FT include car parks, loading/unloading areas and cargo lifts. Selected Flatted Factories enjoy amenity centres located NET LETTABLE NUMBER OF within the cluster. AREA TENANTS Many of MIT’s Flatted Factories are 7,685,736 1,794 SQ FT TENANTS located near established housing estates, providing tenants access to a ready labour pool and the convenience of GROSS REVENUE OCCUPANCY shops and services. Most of the Flatted (FOR FY15/16) (FOR FY15/16) Factories are also well-connected to major roads, expressways and Mass S$161.7 94.6 Rapid Transit system, offering convenient MILLION % access for tenants. VALUATION % OF PORTFOLIO (BY VALUATION) S$1,566.4 44.0 MILLION % Flatted Factory, Kampong Ubi TOP FIVE TENANTS IN FLATTED FACTORIES % of Portfolio Gross Monthly Property/ Rental Income Cluster Tenant (As at No Tenant Name Trade Sector 31 March 2016) 1 HGST Kaki Bukit Computer, 1.8% Singapore Electronic and Pte. Ltd. Optical Products 11.8% 43.0% 2 Semiconductor Kallang Precision 0.5% Technologies Basin 6 Engineering, 26.7% & Instruments Electrical, Pte Ltd Machinery and Transportation TENANT Products BUSINESS SECTOR (BY GROSS RENTAL INCOME) 3 Blackmagic Kolam Computer, 0.5% Design Ayer 5 Electronic and Manufacturing Optical Products Pte.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Goh's Speech
    SINGAPORESINGAPORE’’’’SS WATERFRONT REJUVENATION EFFORTS A Presentation by Mr Mark Goh, Head (Marina Bay Development Agency), Urban Redevelopment Authority, Singapore delivered to the Harbour Business Forum Luncheon in Hong Kong on 28 Mar 2007 IntroIntroductionduction 1 Much like Hong Kong, Singapore as an island city has been blessed with a long coastline and waterbodies right in the heart of the city centre. Within and near the City Centre, we have the Singapore River, Kallang Basin and Marina Bay. Today, I would like to share our experience of developing these waterfront areas and the strategies we took to help us transform these urban waterfront areas. Singapore River 2 Let me start with the Singapore River. The 3km long Singapore River is located in the City Centre. The sheltered banks of the river made it an excellent place for trading and warehousing activities since Singapore’s colonial days. Merchants were quick to build offices, godowns and jetties to facilitate these activities along the riverbanks. 3 By the 1860s, three quarters of all shipping businesses in Singapore was done here. By the 1970s, as business proliferated, so did the pollution. Both the river banks and water became polluted by the myriad activities and squatters along the river. In fact, the river was like an open sewer. 4 The task to clean up Singapore River was an enormous one, and involved many government agencies. To start off, all the boats were moved out to Pasir Panjang as container shipping had replaced this earlier mode of transporting goods from the ships to the godowns. Tonnes of garbage were dredged from the river.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 with the Current Closure of the Singapore City Gallery Due to the COVID-19 Situation, We Have Curated a List of Articles From
    With the current closure of the Singapore City Gallery due to the COVID-19 situation, we have curated a list of articles from our past Skyline editions. We hope this will provide you a background on Singapore’s urban planning within the safety of your home. Instructions to search for e-copy from NLB 1. Go to NLB Search 2. Select Advanced Search 3. At title box, type: Skyline 4. Select search medium: Magazines & Articles List of past Skyline editions by topics a. Special topics b. Planning areas 1 Special Topics S/N Keywords Issue Year Title of Articles 1 Active Mobility; Skyline, Issue 5, 2016 2016 Rise of the innovative city; Working Public Spaces; towards active mobility; Creative hacks to Kampong Spirit; public spaces; Bringing back the kampong Urban Farming spirit; Urban farm to table; At a glance: 6 new ways to appreciate our city anew 2 Architecture; Skyline Sept/Oct. 2005 Architecture of the crossroad city; Honours Heritage 2005 for heritage 3 Best Cities; Skyline, May/June 1998 Showcasing the best cities; Safe and Creative Solutions; 1998 charming; Creative solutions; Restoration Understanding restoration 4 Business Improvement Skyline: Insights into 2019 Making cities work; More reasons to make District programme; planning space cities great, 9 new precincts are piloting Redesigning Cities for around us. Issue 10 the Business Improvement District People; 2019 programme; Redesigning cities for people, Reconnect with Nature; former Toronto chief planner Jennifer Restoration Keesmaat advocates for complete streets focused on pedestrians; Is Singapore a biophilic city? Yes and more - conservationist Dr Lena Chan on why we need to reconnect with nature; New travels and old biscuits, we explore how The Great Madras and Khong Guan Building have been beautifully restored 5 Cities; Skyline, May/June 2012 Six cities offer valuable lessons; Sustainable Sustainability; 2012 solutions for cities of the future; A labour Conservation; of love for conservation; Programming the Rail Corridor Rail Corridor; Perspectives from the ideal city.
    [Show full text]