DOCSLIB.ORG

The Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology Of San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Dissertations Master's Theses and Graduate Research Summer 2019 The Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology of Social and Racial Justice Educators: An Untapped Resource to Address the Unequal Educational Outcomes for Students of Color and Other Non- dominant Comunities Adriana Eva Rangel San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_dissertations Recommended Citation Rangel, Adriana Eva, "The Ontology, Epistemology, and Axiology of Social and Racial Justice Educators: An Untapped Resource to Address the Unequal Educational Outcomes for Students of Color and Other Non-dominant Comunities" (2019). Dissertations. 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.3j85-dmm5 https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_dissertations/35 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ONTOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND AXIOLOGY OF SOCIAL AND RACIAL JUSTICE EDUCATORS: AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE TO ADDRESS THE UNEQUAL EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS OF COLOR AND OTHER NON-DOMINANT COMMUNITIES A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Educational Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctorate of Education by Adriana E. Rangel August 2019 © 2019 Adriana E. Rangel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Dissertation Committee Approves the Dissertation Titled THE ONTOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND AXIOLOGY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE FACULTY OF COLOR: AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE TO ADDRESS THE UNEQUAL EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS OF COLOR AND OTHER NON-DOMINANT COMMUNITIES by Adriana E. Rangel APPROVED FOR THE EDUCATIONAL DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY August 2019 Marcos Pizarro, Ph.D. Educational Leadership Roxana Marachi, Ph.D. Educational Leadership Ana Lomas, Ph.D. Campbell Unified School District Abstract THE ONTOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY, AND AXIOLOGY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE FACULTY OF COLOR: AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE TO ADDRESS THE UNEQUAL EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES FOR STUDENTS OF COLOR AND OTHER NON-DOMINANT COMMUNITIES By Adriana E. Rangel Despite repeated efforts towards educational reform, white students continue to experience higher educational attainment levels than historically underserved students. While the responsibility to change these outcomes has been vastly placed on the educational system, these disenfranchised populations have largely carried the blame for not improving their educational achievement. Thus, Students of Color have been portrayed as not possessing the drive nor interest to increase their educational attainment rates. Research notes many educators working with Communities of Color often lack the necessary critical consciousness around issues of race, privilege, power and oppression. These are warranted to adequately understand and support opportunities for marginalized populations. This research study employed a qualitative approach and multidisciplinary lenses to examine testimonios of five Faculty of Color committed to social justice. The premise of this study is to explore: 1) the ontological, epistemological, and axiological principles that shape how Faculty of Color approach their work; 2) the strategies used in professional training and credentialing programs where they teach; and 3) ways they navigate racial dynamics within academic institutions. This research study proposes an ontogeny model for social justice educators, and pronounces how critical this ontogeny is to reach social and racial equity at any level of formal education. iv Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my ancestors for the rich history of struggle and survival that I have inherited and treasure. To the people that worked with me on this research, I am forever indebted to you. Thank you for darme la mano in spite of your many obligations and limited time. I feel truly honored. To my dissertation committee, your support made all the difference. Dr. Pizarro, you challenged me intellectually every step of the way and did not allow me to give less than my best. Dr. Marachi, for the kind support since the beginning, and Dr. Lomas, who inspired me to follow her steps and earn this doctorate. To Cohort # 1, especially to Noralee Jasso and Long Truong: you made this academic journey challenging and enjoyable. Noralee Jasso, our intellectual discussions were better than any class we could have taken. We challenged each other as we deconstructed traditional ideologies and constructed new knowledge together. I am looking forward to many years of writing together. To my familia, close and far, I love you and missed you all. Thank you for your support and patience. I hope to see you more often now. To my sons, Peter and Jonathan, thank you for supporting my dreams, for the food, back rubs, and the hugs. You two are the strength that empowers me. I hope that you find your life purpose and achieve all your dreams. I want to see you two accomplished and happy as I feel today. v To my husband, Pedro, you are my rock and you have been there through thick and thin. I feel as lucky today as the day I married you. Thank you for your patience and encouragement. I dedicate this research to all the students that inspired it; students who struggle every day in a system that needs to catch up to their needs, students like my brother, Sandro, whose potential is still hidden. For all the late bloomers and por los que no. vi Table of Contents List of Tables …….…………………………………………………….……………… x List of Figures …….……………………………………………………………………. xi Chapter One – Background of the Study ……………….……..………………………… 1 Setting the Context ………………………………………………………………….. 1 Unequal educational outcomes………………………….…………………….... 2 The responsibility of educators………………………………..……………….. 3 Preparing the next generation of educators……….……………......................... 4 Social justice education programs…..................................................................... 5 Statement of the Problem……………………………………...…………………….. 7 Purpose of the Study …………………………………………………………...….... 8 Research Questions……………………………………………..………………….... 9 Significance of the Study……………………………………………..……………… 9 Definition of Terms & Phrases…………..…………...…………………………....... 10 Delimitations……………………………………...………………………………… 12 Summary……………………………………………………..…..…………………. 13 Organization of the Study…………………………………………………………… 13 Chapter Two – Literature Review ……………................................................................ 15 Contributing Factors ………………………………………...……………………... 16 Critical Race Theory...………………………………………………………….. 16 Latina/Latino Critical Race Theory…………………………………………….. 17 Multiculturalism ……………………………………………………………….. 19 Critical pedagogies …………………………………………………………….. 24 Pedagogy of the oppressed………………………………………………..... 24 Cultural responsive pedagogy………………………………………….…... 24 Culturally relevant pedagogy……………………………………………..... 25 Culturally sustaining pedagogy ……………………………………….…… 27 Pedagogy of care…………………………………………………………… 28 Critical hope ……………………………………………………………...... 28 Culturally relevant care …………………………………………………..... 29 Nepantlera pedagogy………………………………………………….…..... 30 Reality pedagogy …………………………………………………….…….. 30 Sentipensante ……………………………………………………………..... 31 Fieldwork……………………………………………………….......................... 32 Reflections and counterstories………………………………...……………...... 35 Summary of Contributing Factors………………………………………………...... 39 Deterring Factors……………………………………………………………….…… 41 The false dichotomy of the social justice definition …………………….…… 41 Epistemology of the oppressor………………………………………..……....... 44 The role of whiteness and white privilege …………………………………… 46 vii Hegemonic constructions………………………………………………………. 47 Meritocracy…………………………………………………………………. 47 Deficit thinking…………………………………………………………….. 48 Tools of whiteness………………………………………………………….….. 50 Lack of critical faculty……………………………………………………….... 51 Superficial treatment of racism……………………………………………….. 52 Lack of diversity in teaching force…………………………………………... 53 Silence and isolation………………………………………………………...….. 55 Summary of Deterring Factors……………………………………………………… 57 Changing the Status Quo……………………………………………………………. 60 Chapter Three – Methodology ………………………………………………………..... 62 Participants ………………………………………………………………………..... 62 Site ………………………………………………………………………………...... 66 Protocol & Data Collection…………………………………………………………. 66 Limitations of the Study ……………………………………………………………. 67 Positionality and Biases …………………………………………………………….. 68 Validity………………………………………………………………………..…….. 69 Rational for Qualitative Approach ………………………………………………..... 70 Testimonio ………………………………………………………………..…….. 70 Anzaldua’s Mestiza Consciousness and the Path of Conocimiento…………...... 72 Critical race-grounded methodology …………………………………………… 73 Indigenous methodologies …………………………………………………...… 74 Chicana feminist epistemology ……………………………………………….... 77 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs ………………………………………………..... 79 The Social Justice Pyramid …………………………………………………….. 79 Dichos (sayings) …………………………………………………………..…..... 82 Summary of Chapter Three……………………………………………………..…... 82 Chapter Four – Findings ………... ………………………………………………..….... 86 Findings for Question 1 Ontology of social justice educators……………………………………….….... 86 El sacrificio (community sacrifice)…………………………….………..… 87 Dale la mano a tu hermano (relational commitment) …………………......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Denying a Dualism: Goodman's Repudiation of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction
    Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 28, 2004, 226-238. Denying a Dualism: Goodman’s Repudiation of the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction Catherine Z. Elgin The analytic synthetic/distinction forms the backbone of much modern Western philosophy. It underwrites a conception of the relation of representations to reality which affords an understanding of cognition. Its repudiation thus requires a fundamental reconception and perhaps a radical revision of philosophy. Many philosophers believe that the repudiation of the analytic/synthetic distinction and kindred dualisms constitutes a major loss, possibly even an irrecoverable loss, for philosophy. Nelson Goodman thinks otherwise. He believes that it liberates philosophy from unwarranted restrictions, creating opportunities for the development of powerful new approaches to and reconceptions of seemingly intractable problems. In this article I want to sketch some of the consequences of Goodman’s reconception. My focus is not on Goodman’s reasons for denying the dualism, but on some of the ways its absence affects his position. I do not contend that the Goodman obsessed over the issue. I have no reason to think that the repudiation of the distinction was a central factor in his intellectual life. But by considering the function that the analytic/synthetic distinction has performed in traditional philosophy, and appreciating what is lost and gained in repudiating it, we gain insight into Goodman’s contributions. I begin then by reviewing the distinction and the conception of philosophy it supports. The analytic/synthetic distinction is a distinction between truths that depend entirely on meaning and truths that depend on both meaning and fact. In the early modern period, it was cast as a distinction between relations of ideas and matters of fact.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Logic 2018 Course Description (Tentative) January 15, 2018
    Philosophical Logic 2018 Course description (tentative) January 15, 2018 Valentin Goranko Introduction This 7.5 hp course is mainly intended for students in philosophy and is generally accessible to a broad audience with basic background on formal classical logic and general appreciation of philosophical aspects of logic. Practical information The course will be given in English. It will comprise 18 two-hour long sessions combining lectures and exercises, grouped in 2 sessions per week over 9 teaching weeks. The weekly pairs of 2-hour time slots (incl. short breaks) allocated for these sessions, will be on Mondays during 10.00-12.00 and 13.00-15.00, except for the first lecture. The course will begin on Wednesday, April 4, 2018 (Week 14) at 10.00 am in D220, S¨odra huset, hus D. Lecturer's info: Name: Valentin Goranko Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://www2.philosophy.su.se/goranko Course webpage: http://www2.philosophy.su.se/goranko/Courses2018/PhilLogic-2018.html Prerequisites The course will be accessible to a broad audience with introductory background on classical formal logic. Some basic knowledge of modal logics would be an advantage but not a prerequisite. Brief description Philosophical logic studies a variety of non-classical logical systems intended to formalise and reason about various philosophical concepts and ideas. They include a broad family of modal logics, as well as many- valued, intuitionistic, relevant, conditional, non-monotonic, para-consistent, etc. logics. Modal logics extend classical logic with additional intensional logical operators, reflecting different modes of truth, including alethic, epistemic, doxastic, temporal, deontic, agentive, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability of Mathematical Inference
    Reliability of mathematical inference Jeremy Avigad Department of Philosophy and Department of Mathematical Sciences Carnegie Mellon University January 2020 Formal logic and mathematical proof An important mathematical goal is to get the answers right: • Our calculations are supposed to be correct. • Our proofs are supposed to be correct. Mathematical logic offers an idealized account of correctness, namely, formal derivability. Informal proof is viewed as an approximation to the ideal. • A mathematician can be called on to expand definitions and inferences. • The process has to terminate with fundamental notions, assumptions, and inferences. Formal logic and mathematical proof Two objections: • Few mathematicians can state formal axioms. • There are various formal foundations on offer. Slight elaboration: • Ordinary mathematics relies on an informal foundation: numbers, tuples, sets, functions, relations, structures, . • Formal logic accounts for those (and any of a number of systems suffice). Formal logic and mathematical proof What about intuitionstic logic, or large cardinal axioms? Most mathematics today is classical, and does not require strong assumptions. But even in those cases, the assumptions can be make explicit and formal. Formal logic and mathematical proof So formal derivability provides a standard of correctness. Azzouni writes: The first point to observe is that formalized proofs have become the norms of mathematical practice. And that is to say: should it become clear that the implications (of assumptions to conclusion) of an informal proof cannot be replicated by a formal analogue, the status of that informal proof as a successful proof will be rejected. Formal verification, a branch of computer science, provides corroboration: computational proof assistants make formalization routine (though still tedious).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 086 604 SO 006 822 AUTHOR Norris, Jack A., Jr. TITLE Introduction to Philosophy. Social Studies--Language Arts: 6414.16. INSTITUTION Dade County Public Schools, Miami, Fla. PUB DATE 72 NOTE 20p.; Authorized Course of Instruction for the Quinmester Program EDRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 DESCRIPTORS Course Objectives; Curriculum Guides; Grade 10; Grade 11; Grade 12; *Language Arts; Learnin4 Activities; *Logic; Non Western Civilization; *Philosophy; Resource Guides; Secondary Grades; *Social Studies; *Social Studies Units; Western Civilization IDENTIFIERS *Quinmester Program ABSTRACT Western and non - western philosophers and their ideas are introduced to 10th through 12th grade students in this general social studies Quinmester course designed to be used as a preparation for in-depth study of the various schools of philosophical thought. By acquainting students with the questions and categories of philosophy, a point of departure for further study is developed. Through suggested learning activities the meaning of philosopky is defined. The Socratic, deductive, inductive, intuitive and eclectic approaches to philosophical thought are examined, as are three general areas of philosophy, metaphysics, epistemology,and axiology. Logical reasoning is applied to major philosophical questions. This course is arranged, as are other quinmester courses, with sections on broad goals, course content, activities, and materials. A related document is ED 071 937.(KSM) FILMED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY U S DEPARTMENT EDUCATION OF HEALTH. NAT10N41
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    BAS C. VAN FRAASSEN Curriculum Vitae Last updated 3/6/2019 I. Personal and Academic History .................................................................................................................... 1 List of Degrees Earned ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Title of Ph.D. Thesis ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Positions held ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Invited lectures and lecture series ........................................................................................................................................ 1 List of Honors, Prizes ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Research Grants .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Non-Academic Publications ................................................................................................................................................ 5 II. Professional Activities .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Misconceived Relationships Between Logical Positivism and Quantitative Research: an Analysis in the Framework of Ian Hacking
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 452 266 TM 032 553 AUTHOR Yu, Chong Ho TITLE Misconceived Relationships between Logical Positivism and Quantitative Research: An Analysis in the Framework of Ian Hacking. PUB DATE 2001-04-07 NOTE 26p. PUB TYPE Opinion Papers (120) ED 2S PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. 'DESCRIPTORS *Educational Research; *Research Methodology IDENTIFIERS *Logical Positivism ABSTRACT Although quantitative research methodology is widely applied by psychological researchers, there is a common misconception that quantitative research is based on logical positivism. This paper examines the relationship between quantitative research and eight major notions of logical positivism:(1) verification;(2) pro-observation;(3) anti-cause; (4) downplaying explanation;(5) anti-theoretical entities;(6) anti-metaphysics; (7) logical analysis; and (8) frequentist probability. It is argued that the underlying philosophy of modern quantitative research in psychology is in sharp contrast to logical positivism. Putting the labor of an out-dated philosophy into quantitative research may discourage psychological researchers from applying this research approach and may also lead to misguided dispute between quantitative and qualitative researchers. What is needed is to encourage researchers and students to keep an open mind to different methodologies and apply skepticism to examine the philosophical assumptions instead of accepting them unquestioningly. (Contains 1 figure and 75 references.)(Author/SLD) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Misconceived relationships between logical positivism and quantitative research: An analysis in the framework of Ian Hacking Chong Ho Yu, Ph.D. Arizona State University April 7, 2001 N N In 4-1 PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIALHAS BEEN GRANTED BY Correspondence: TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES Chong Ho Yu, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology on Management
    The Second International Conference on Entrepreneurship STUDY OF ONTOLOGY, EPISTEMOLOGY AND AXIOLOGY ON MANAGEMENT Rahmat Setiawan1 Airlangga University, Surabaya INDONESIA Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT There is still a difference of opinion among experts in the field of management of what is meant by management, namely whether the management is a science, an art or a profession. In addition, the management theory and studies have also experienced rapid growth, especially until the 19th century until the present. These developments have given rise to various groups of schools of thought about the management, which is a group of classical management perspective, a group of behavior management perspective, and a group of quantitative management perspective. Therefore, it is necessary to study on the development of management in terms of the philosophy of science perspective. By doing this assessment, management will be studied ontological, epistemological and axiological. Ontologically, management is the science, art and profession of work done through others. Material object is a behavior management work done through others. In management development, ontologically most experts view reality of social management in management as something objective, not subjective. Epistemologically, in management development, the approach most widely used by management experts is a deductive approach. However, the trend also shows that the inductive approach is also widely used lately. In axiological, largely through the efforts of study and research in the development of management is not value-free because the paradigm used by most bear management experts in developing management are positivist or functionalist paradigm. However, in applying the results of research to take a policy, then the leader of the company must still pay attention to the values of ethics and humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Axiology and the Philosophy of Social Science; Esp., Political Science
    Formal Axiology and the Philosophy of Social Science; esp., Political Science Introduction In the 22 centuries from Aristotle to Galileo, man’s way of life, and knowledge of nature, changed very little compared to the explosion of invention and discovery in the mere four centuries since Galileo. According to philosopher of science, R.S. Hartman, Galileo empowered humanity to make such progress when he “created the empirico-mathematical world picture;” that is, the worldview of natural science.1 During the Scientific Revolution, the European sense of reality was transformed from a dream-like condition under the control of “God’s Will,” and which only He could fully understand, to sets of processes which could be understood and explained in precise mathematical formulas. Natural philosophy, prior to Galileo, offered “explanations” of natural phenomena, but without much precision. For example, Aristotle defined “movement” as “the transition from potentiality to actuality.” This was accepted and studied for centuries. But Galileo re-defined “motion,” so that it became mathematically measurable. Rather than the vagaries of “realizing potential,” Galileo offered the formula V=s/t. He showed that by measuring the space (s) traversed by an object, and the time (t) it took, a precise measurement of speed, or velocity (V), could be calculated. Now motion was much less a mystery. Hartman notes that “Galileo’s formula led to a multitude of consequences; [eventually including] the systems of Newton and Einstein.”2 Galileo thus changed the way of thinking about nature from vague philosophical speculation to a method applying precise formal analysis and explanation. That shift in the way of thinking made possible all that followed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction and the Classical Model of Science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege
    Synthese (2010) 174:237–261 DOI 10.1007/s11229-008-9420-9 The analytic-synthetic distinction and the classical model of science: Kant, Bolzano and Frege Willem R. de Jong Received: 10 April 2007 / Revised: 24 July 2007 / Accepted: 1 April 2008 / Published online: 8 November 2008 © The Author(s) 2008. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract This paper concentrates on some aspects of the history of the analytic- synthetic distinction from Kant to Bolzano and Frege. This history evinces con- siderable continuity but also some important discontinuities. The analytic-synthetic distinction has to be seen in the first place in relation to a science, i.e. an ordered system of cognition. Looking especially to the place and role of logic it will be argued that Kant, Bolzano and Frege each developed the analytic-synthetic distinction within the same conception of scientific rationality, that is, within the Classical Model of Science: scientific knowledge as cognitio ex principiis. But as we will see, the way the distinction between analytic and synthetic judgments or propositions functions within this model turns out to differ considerably between them. Keywords Analytic-synthetic · Science · Logic · Kant · Bolzano · Frege 1 Introduction As is well known, the critical Kant is the first to apply the analytic-synthetic distinction to such things as judgments, sentences or propositions. For Kant this distinction is not only important in his repudiation of traditional, so-called dogmatic, metaphysics, but it is also crucial in his inquiry into (the possibility of) metaphysics as a rational science. Namely, this distinction should be “indispensable with regard to the critique of human understanding, and therefore deserves to be classical in it” (Kant 1783, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Description Logics—Basics, Applications, and More
    Description Logics|Basics, Applications, and More Ian Horrocks Information Management Group University of Manchester, UK Ulrike Sattler Teaching and Research Area for Theoretical Computer Science RWTH Aachen, Germany RWTH Aachen 1 Germany Overview of the Tutorial • History and Basics: Syntax, Semantics, ABoxes, Tboxes, Inference Problems and their interrelationship, and Relationship with other (logical) formalisms • Applications of DLs: ER-diagrams with i.com demo, ontologies, etc. including system demonstration • Reasoning Procedures: simple tableaux and why they work • Reasoning Procedures II: more complex tableaux, non-standard inference prob- lems • Complexity issues • Implementing/Optimising DL systems RWTH Aachen 2 Germany Description Logics • family of logic-based knowledge representation formalisms well-suited for the representation of and reasoning about ➠ terminological knowledge ➠ configurations ➠ ontologies ➠ database schemata { schema design, evolution, and query optimisation { source integration in heterogeneous databases/data warehouses { conceptual modelling of multidimensional aggregation ➠ : : : • descendents of semantics networks, frame-based systems, and KL-ONE • aka terminological KR systems, concept languages, etc. RWTH Aachen 3 Germany Architecture of a Standard DL System Knowledge Base I N Terminology F E I R Father = Man u 9 has child.>... N E T Human = Mammal. u Biped . N E Description C R E F Logic A Concrete Situation S C Y E John:Human u Father S John has child Bill . T . E M RWTH Aachen 4 Germany Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Logic to Philosophical Theology: a Formal Deductive Inference of Affirming God's Existence from Assuming the A-Priori
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Tomsk State University Repository Вестник Томского государственного университета Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 55 ОНТОЛОГИЯ, ЭПИСТЕМОЛОГИЯ, ЛОГИКА УДК 16 + 17 + 2 + 51-7 DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/55/1 V.O. Lobovikov1 APPLYING LOGIC TO PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGY: A FORMAL DEDUCTIVE INFERENCE OF AFFIRMING GOD’S EXISTENCE FROM ASSUMING THE A-PRIORI-NESS OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE SIGMA FORMAL AXIOMATIC THEORY For the first time a precise definition is given to the Sigma formal axiomatic theory, which is a result of logical formalization of philosophical epistemology; and an interpretation of this formal theory is offered. Also, for the first time, a formal deductive proof is constructed in Sigma for a formula, which represents (in the offered interpretation) the statement of God’s Existence under the condition that knowledge is a priori. Keywords: formal axiomatic epistemology theory; two-valued algebra of formal axiology; formal-axiological equivalence; a-priori knowledge; existence of God. 1. Introduction Since Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Stoics, Cicero, and especially since the very beginning of Christianity philosophy, the possibility or impossibility of logical proving God’s existence has been a nontrivial problem of philosophical theology. Today the literature on this topic is immense. However, even in our days, the knot- ty problem remains unsolved as all the suggested options of solving it are contro- versial from some point of view. Some respectable researchers (let us call them “pessimists”) believed that the logical proving of God’s existence in theoretical philosophy was impossible on principle, for instance, Occam, Hume [1], and Kant [2] believed that any rational theoretic-philosophy proof of His existence was a mistake (illusion), consequently, a search for the logical proving of His existence was wasting resources and, hence, harmful; only faith in God was relevant and useful; reason was irrelevant and use- less.
    [Show full text]
  • Willard Van Orman Quine: the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction
    Willard Van Orman Quine: The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction Willard Van Orman Quine was one of the most well-known American “analytic” philosophers of the twentieth century. He made significant contributions to many areas of philosophy, including philosophy of language, logic, epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of mind/psychology (behaviorism). However, he is best known for his rejection of the analytic/synthetic distinction. Technically, this is the distinction between statements true in virtue of the meanings of their terms (like “a bachelor is an unmarried man”) and statements whose truth is a function not simply of the meanings of terms, but of the way the world is (such as, “That bachelor is wearing a grey suit”). Although a contentious thesis, analyticity has been a popular explanation, especially among empiricists, both for the necessity of necessary truths and for the a priori knowability of some truths. Thus, in some contexts “analytic truth,” “necessary truth,” and “a priori truth” have been used interchangeably, and the analytic/synthetic distinction has been treated as equivalent to the distinctions between necessary and contingent truths, and between a priori and a posteriori (or empirical) truths. Empirical truths can be known only by empirical verification, rather than by “unpacking” the meanings of the terms involved, and are usually thought to be contingent. Quine wrestled with the analytic/synthetic distinction for years, but he did not make his thoughts public until 1950, when he delivered his paper, “The Two Dogmas of Empiricism” at a meeting of the American Philosophical Association. In this paper, Quine argues that all attempts to define and understand analyticity are circular.
    [Show full text]