Economic Transition and the Exchange-Rate Regime Author(S): Jeffrey D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Economic Transition and the Exchange-Rate Regime Author(S): Jeffrey D American Economic Association Economic Transition and the Exchange-Rate Regime Author(s): Jeffrey D. Sachs Reviewed work(s): Source: The American Economic Review, Vol. 86, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association San Francisco, CA, January 5-7, 1996 (May, 1996), pp. 147-152 Published by: American Economic Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118113 . Accessed: 27/01/2012 16:54 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Economic Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Economic Review. http://www.jstor.org EXCHANGE-RATEREGIMES AND MACROECONOMICSTABILITYt Economic Transitionand the Exchange-Rate Regime By JEFFREYD. SACHS* Exchange-ratemanagement poses special initialpolicy, even if the countriesshould then challengesin thetransition economies of Eastern move to flexible-ratesystems after one or two Europeand the formerSoviet Union. These yearsof stabilizationand liberalization. countriesare adapting to open,market-based in- Most of the transitioneconomies began the temationaltrade without prior experience with shift to marketswith a commonset of struc- currencyconvertibility. Most are undertaking turalimbalances: repressed inflation, marked stabilizationprograms to end high inflation. by extreme shortagesin consumerand pro- Therefore,monetary and exchange-ratepolicy ducermarkets; large fiscal deficits,including mustbe designedwith an eye towardcurrency an overhang of foreign debt; extreme cur- stabilization.They are undergoingenormous rencyinconvertibility, including a largeblack- structuralchange, with very large movements in marketpremium on the exchange rate; low relativeprices and productivity,so thatindica- levels of domesticcompetitiveness; and weak torsof a country'sinternational competitiveness tradeand financial linkages with marketecon- (e.g., relativeunit labor costs, relativeproducer omies, includingWestern Europe. In Central prices)provide a very impreciseguide for pol- Europe,Czechoslovakia stood out as the sole icy. Likemany other countries in thedeveloping case of a countrythat began the reformperiod world,these countries are experiencing large in- withoutextreme prior macroeconomicinsta- flows and outflowsof capitaland are therefore bility. The financialproblems of the former increasinglysubject to shocksemanating from Soviet Union andthe formerYugoslavia were worldcapital markets. greatlycompounded by the suddenemergence In this maelstrom,are there guidelinesfor of new nationstates withoutseparate curren- the appropriatemanagement of the exchange- cies and, thereby,with multiplecentral banks rateregime? What kinds of numericalindica- ostensiblysharing a commoncurrency, with- torsshould be uppermostin the policymaker's out overallcoordination or control. attention?What advice and assistanceshould The first stage of the marketreforms in al- be given by the internationalfinancial com- most all transitioncountries was the liberal- munity,and most importantly,the IMF? izationof prices,the unificationof the official exchangerate and the marketexchange rate, I. EarlyExchange-Rate Management and the opening of the economy to interna- tionaltrade. In Poland,this was combinedwith Exchange-ratemanagement is one of the strongfiscal and monetarymeasures, so that areasof reformwhere optimal transitional pol- inflationvery quickly subsided,falling from icies may well differfrom long-rangeoperat- 586 percentin 1990 to 70 percentin 1991 and ing policies. For example, there are good 43 percentin 1992. In some othercountries in reasonsfor countriesat the startof stabiliza- EasternEurope, notably Bulgaria and Roma- tion and liberalizationprograms to adopt a nia, monetaryand fiscal policies remained lax, pegged exchange-rate regime as part of the and triple-digitinflation persisted for several years. In Hungary,moderate inflation rates (20-40 percentper year) persisted throughout the early 1990's. In the successorstates of the t Discussants: Michael Bruno, World Bank; Stanley Fischer, InternationalMonetary Fund. Soviet Union, high inflationwas pandemic, * HarvardInstitute for InternationalDevelopment, One reaching triple- or quadruple-digitrates in Eliot Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. 1992 in every one of the 15 new nations. 147 148 AEA PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS MAY 1996 The practical issue facing governments and bank financing of the Russian budget deficit. central banks was the appropriate manage- Russia and the other successor states were able ment of the exchange rate after price liberal- to achieve stabilization only when they be- ization, both in the immediate aftermath and came masters of their own monetary fate (i.e., in the longer term. This choice, of course, was only when they adopted a separate national partof a larger set of choices involving the role currency not used by other countries). In Rus- of the central bank, the implementation of sia, full monetary independence from the other monetary reforms (in the new nations), the states effectively began in the fall of 1993, scale of fiscal deficits, and their mode of when Soviet currency notes were withdrawn financing. Four countries relied initially on from circulation in Russia, and republics that pegged exchange rates: Czechoslovakia, Es- still lacked their own currency finally moved tonia, Hungary, and Poland. Four others relied to establish new national currencies. on floating exchange rates: Kygyzstan, Latvia, Poland established a patternfor other reform Russia, and Ukraine. By 1994, all but Russia countries with its rapid introduction of con- and Ukraine had succeeded in ending high in- vertibility on January 1, 1990. Ten Western flation, and in carrying out other main aspects governments joined to provide a $1 billion of reform.' zloty stabilization fund to provide reserves to Even before reaching the decision over defend the newly convertible currency. The exchange-rate regime, the successor states to zloty was devalued sharply, unified with the the Soviet Union had to take decisions regard- black-market rate, and then pegged vis-a-vis ing a national currency. In this, the IMF made the dollar. Inflation spiked in the month of a serious mistake in early 1992, in pushing price liberalization, to 100 percent in January, hard for the continuation of a common cur- and then fell to 20 percent in February, and 5 rency for the successor states, despite the ex- percent in March. The nominal exchange-rate istence of 15 separate central banks and little peg held successfully, without resort to the sta- feasibility of monetary coordination among bilization fund, and was maintained until a de- the separate central banks (see Sachs [1995a] valuation in April 1991. Poland adopted a for further discussion). In the spring of 1992, crawling peg in October 1991 and then a the IMF advised all countries that introduction crawling band in July 1995. Czechoslovakia of separate national currencies should be de- followed the Polish example one year later, layed for months (until the fall of 1992 at the when it devalued the koruna, established lim- earliest, in the case of advice to Estonia) or ited convertibility, and pegged the exchange indefinitely. This naive advice set back stabi- rate in January 1991. Hungary eschewed a lization by at least one year in most of the for- one-time step to convertibility but achieved mer Soviet Union, since the common currency substantial convertibility on the trade account effectively gave a license to issue credits to in 1990 and, thereafter, pegged the exchange each of the central banks. The Russian gov- rate, with occasional devaluations. ernment continued to accept the ruble credits Under IMF advice, other Eastern European issued by the non-Russian central banks in economies established quick convertibility, payment for imports from Russia and, in the but the IMF urged the other countries to move end, effectively supplied up to 7 percent of directly to a floating rate. Bulgaria and Ro- Russian GDP to the other republics in net ship- mania floated their exchange rates beginning ments financed by credits in the period April- in 1990. A similar pattern played out in the December 1992. This 7 percent of GDP former Soviet Union, once the Soviet ruble showed up in the Russian money supply and was dropped in favor of a national currency. provided a financial impetus to inflation of One country, Estonia, adopted a pegged about the same magnitude as did the central- exchange rate, counter to the initial advice of the IMF (though the IMF agreed to support the Estonian position). All other countries of ' A table summarizing the decisions taken for a repre- the former Soviet Union, under IMF tutelage, sentative selection of eight countries throughoutthe region moved directly to floating-exchange-rate re- is available from the author upon request. gimes. In early 1994, two of the initial floaters, VOL 86 NO. 2 EXCHANGE-RATEREGIMES AND MACROECONOMICSTABILITY 149 Latvia and Lithuania, adopted a pegged rateis usefulin the earlyphase of stabilization exchange rate
Recommended publications
  • A Survey of the Institutional and Operational Aspects of Modern-Day Currency Boards by Corrinne Ho
    BIS Working Papers No 110 A survey of the institutional and operational aspects of modern-day currency boards by Corrinne Ho Monetary and Economic Department March 2002 Abstract This paper surveys the institutional and operational features of the six modern currency boards. The survey is developed around three key aspects: organisation, operations and legal foundation. By laying out the facts, this survey seeks to shed light on how and why modern currency boards in practice are different from the classic definition, and to distil from their features an updated definition and the revised “rules of the game”. JEL Classification Numbers: E42, E52, E58 Keywords: currency boards, convertibility, rules, discretion, liquidity management BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. Copies of publications are available from: Bank for International Settlements Information, Press & Library Services CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +41 61 280 9100 and +41 61 280 8100 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2002. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is cited. ISSN 1020-0959 Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • The Choice and Design of Exchange Rate Regimes Már Gudmundsson
    The choice and design of exchange rate regimes Már Gudmundsson Introduction This paper discusses the design and management of exchange rate regimes in Africa.1 It starts by looking at the current landscape of exchange rate regimes in the region and comparing it to other regions of the world. It then discusses relevant considerations for the choice of exchange rate regimes in developing countries, including the optimal currency area, but also their limitations in a developing country context. The ability of countries to deliver disciplined macroeconomic policies inside or outside a currency union is an important consideration in that regard, along with political goals and the promotion of financial sector development and integration. The paper then proceeds to discuss in turn the management of flexible exchange rates, the design of exchange rate pegs and monetary integration. Exchange rate regimes in Africa Exchange rate regimes in Africa reflect choices made at the time of independence as well as more recent trends in exchange rate regimes of developing countries. Original exchange rate pegs in many cases evolved over time into flexible exchange rates. That development was given a further boost by the stabilisation and liberalisation programmes in the 1980s and 1990s. Former colonies of France constitute a core group in the CFA franc zone of western and central Africa, which is composed of two currency unions with a hard external peg to the euro, underpinned by the French authorities. Three neighbouring countries of South Africa are part of the rand zone, where national currencies are 1 The paper draws extensively on Masson and Pattillo (2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina's Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies After the Convertibility
    CENTER FOR ECONOMIC AND POLICY RESEARCH April Argentina’s Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies after the Convertibility Regime Collapse • ii Contents Introduction 1 1. The Convertibility Regime 2 2. The Post-Convertibility Macroeconomic Regime and Performance 9 2.1 The Main Characteristics of the Economic Recovery 10 2.2 The Evolution of Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies 16 3. A Macroeconomic Policy Regime with a SCRER as an Intermediate Target 25 3.1 The Orthodox Arguments Against RER Targeting 26 3.2 The Exchange Rate Policy 29 3.3 The Exchange Market and Capital Flows 30 3.4 Monetary Policy 31 Conclusion 35 References 36 Chronological Appendix 39 About the Authors Roberto Frenkel is a senior research associate at the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C. and Principal Research Associate at the Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad (CEDES) in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Martín Rapetti is a research assistant at CEDES and a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Acknowledgements This paper was written as part of an international research project on Alternatives to Inflation Targeting for Stable and Equitable Growth co-directed by Gerald Epstein, PERI and Erinc Yeldan, Bilkent University. The authors thank the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Ford Foundation and UN-DESA for financial support. Additionally, Nelson Barbosa-Filho, Erinc Yeldan and the participants in the workshop on “Alternatives to Inflation Targeting Monetary Policy for Stable and Egalitarian Growth in Developing Countries” held at CEDES in May 13-14, 2005 contributed comments to a previous version of this paper. Finally, the authors thank Julia Frenkel for her collaboration and Erinc Yeldan and an anonymous referee from World Development for their comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Bank of Russia's Exchange Rate Policy
    The history of the Bank of Russia’s exchange rate policy Central Bank of the Russian Federation Abstract During the post-Soviet period of 1992–98, the monetary policy of the Bank of Russia was essentially exchange rate-oriented due to overall economic and financial instability combined with hyperinflation (1992–94) and high inflation (1995–98). An exchange rate corridor system was introduced in 1995. The government debt crisis of 1998 triggered a shift to a managed floating exchange rate. After that crisis, exchange rate dynamics were largely market-driven. The exchange rate continued to be tightly managed through 2002–05. In 2004, less restrictive capital control regulations were adopted, marking a move from an authorization-based system to flow controls. The rouble experienced steady upward pressure and the Bank of Russia intervened repeatedly in the foreign exchange market to contain the rouble’s appreciation. In 2005, the Bank of Russia introduced a dual-currency basket as the operational indicator for it exchange rate policy, again to smooth the volatility of the rouble’s exchange rate vis-à-vis other major currencies. Following the global financial crisis, the Bank of Russia changed its policy focus towards moderating the rouble’s depreciation. Interest rates were steadily raised, and a range of control measures was implemented. During 2009–12, the Bank of Russia further increased the flexibility of its exchange rate policy. Intervention volumes have steadily decreased. The overall scale of the exchange rate pass-through in the Russian economy has diminished in recent years. Greater flexibility on exchange rates has also let the Bank of Russia put increased emphasis on its interest rate policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Rate Regime and Economic Growth in Asia: Convergence Or Divergence
    Journal of Risk and Financial Management Article Exchange Rate Regime and Economic Growth in Asia: Convergence or Divergence Dao Thi-Thieu Ha 1,* and Nga Thi Hoang 2 1 International Economics Faculty, Banking University Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam 2 Office of Finance & Accounting, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City 70000, Vietnam; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 June 2019; Accepted: 30 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 Abstract: Exchange rates and exchange rate regimes in a constantly changing economy have always attracted much attention from scholars. However, there has not been a consensus on the effect of exchange rate on economic growth. To determine the direction and magnitude of the impact of an exchange rate regime on economic growth, this study uses the exchange rate database constructed by Reinhart and Rogoff. This study also employs the GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) technique on unbalanced panel data to analyze the effect of the exchange rate regime on economic growth in Asian countries from 1994 to 2016. Empirical results suggest that a fixed exchange rate regime (weak flexibility) will affect economic growth in the same direction. As such, results from the study will serve as quantitative evidence for countries in the Asian region to consider when selecting a suitable policy and an exchange rate regime to attain high economic growth. Keywords: exchange rate regime; economic growth; Asia; Reinhart and Rogoff 1. Introduction In a market economy with a flexible exchange rate, the exchange rate changes daily, or in fact, by the minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Euro's Fixed Exchange Rate Regime Undermining Cohesion Policy?
    European Review, page 1 of 25 © 2020 Academia Europaea. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S1062798720001192 Continental Drift: Is the Euro’s Fixed Exchange Rate Regime Undermining Cohesion Policy? CHRISTOPHER JAMES DAY University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy, 16–21 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK. Email: [email protected] The ravages of two world wars and a desire to develop a politically and economically united Europe led to the establishment of the Eurozone in January 1999. The European Monetary Union was a grand experiment that brought 11 European nations under a single currency, the euro. Complexities associated with the imple- mentation of effective fiscal, budgetary and banking coordination left the bloc vul- nerable to asymmetries in the productivity and factor markets of its members. This article analyses how adoption of the euro, which prevented nominal exchange rate adjustments, impacted on the competitiveness and real economies of member states, thereby undermining the European Union’s key priority of creating balanced eco- nomic growth and productivity. 1. Introduction The establishment of the Eurozone in January 1999 marked a significant step towards the European Union’s (EU’s) goal of ‘ever closer union’. Notwithstanding, the absence of sufficient fiscal and budgetary coordination has created tensions between the diverse economies of the European Monetary Union (EMU) (Baldwin and Wyplosz 2012; De Grawe 2012; Stiglitz 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • The Reform of the Renminbi Exchange Rate Regime
    II THE MACRO- FINANCIAL ENVIRONMENT Box 4 THE REFORM OF THE RENMINBI EXCHANGE RATE REGIME Against a background of large and growing global financial imbalances and concerns about the associated risks for global financial stability, international pressure mounted on the Chinese authorities to adopt a more flexible exchange rate regime in order to help curb growing global current account imbalances and to alleviate upward pressure on more flexible international currencies. Many analysts also expected that any revaluation of the Chinese currency would trigger greater exchange rate flexibility in other Asian countries. On 21 July 2005, the renminbi was revalued by 2% against the US dollar, from 8.2765 to 8.11, and the Chinese authorities announced that they had moved to a “managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies”. However, since the reforms, the renminbi has continued to be tightly managed against the US dollar, so that little impact on the scale of global imbalances can be expected in the short term. The Peoples Bank of China (PBC) has emphasised that managing the exchange rate “with reference to” a basket of currencies does not mean that the renminbi will be pegged to a basket of currencies. The objective of the new regime is to keep the renminbi exchange rate basically stable at an adaptive equilibrium level. While the weights of the currencies in the reference basket were not disclosed, the currencies were selected mainly on the basis of the relative shares of China’s trading partners in goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Does a Correlation Exist Between the Foreign Exchange Reserves and the Exchange Rate?
    Does a correlation exist between the foreign exchange reserves and the exchange rate? An empirical study of China Authors: Fang Yu Lu Lili Supervisor: Kim Ittonen Student Umeå School of Business and Economics Autumn semester 2011 Master thesis, two-year, 15 hp ABSTRACT The main purpose of this study is to investigate relationship between foreign exchange reserves and RMB exchange rate. In order to obtain a precise result, foreign trade situation and GDP are also considered. The monthly data is collected over period 1994 to 2011, and processed through ADF test, Johansen test, and Granger causality test. Final results indicate that there is a long-term equilibrium relationship existing between foreign exchange reserves and RMB exchange rate. Moreover, any changes of foreign exchange reserves would lead to the fluctuation of RMB exchange rate but not vice versa. At last, the dummy variables are added into regression model to test influence from the reform of RMB exchange rate regime. Results suggest that regime reform not only increase flexibility of RMB exchange rate, but also slow down the accumulation of foreign exchange reserves. Key words: Foreign exchange reserves, Foreign exchange rate, Gross domestic product, Total volume of import and export trade, RMB I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This study cannot be accomplished effectively without the whole-hearted support of many people. We would more like to express our sincere thanks to the people who makes this research possible. Primarily, we would like to give thanks to our supervisor Mr. Kim Ittonen who offers us a lot of emotional and studying support. He encourages us to carry out this subject from beginning, which builds us more confidence to complete the study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renminbi Exchange Rate Revaluation: Theory, Practice and Lessons from Japan
    The Renminbi Exchange Rate Revaluation: Theory, Practice and Lessons from Japan Toshiki Kanamori (金森俊树) Zhijun Zhao (赵志君) March, 2006 Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building, 8th Floor 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6008 Japan www.adbi.org ADBI Policy Paper No. 9 [email protected] © 2006 Asian Development Bank Institute. Knowledge Management Unit 3/06 ISBN: 4-89974-010-7 The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views or position of the ADB Institute, its Advisory Council, Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. The ADB Institute does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included and accepts no responsibility for any consequences arising from its use. The word “country” or other geographical names do not imply any judgment by the ADB Institute as to the legal or other status of any entity, including its borders. About the authors Toshiki Kanamori is Director, Administration, Management and Coordination of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI). He graduated from Hitotsubashi University as well as from New Asia and Yale Center of Chinese University of Hong Kong. During his government career he served with Japan’s Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of International Trade and Industry. He was an Alternate Director at ADB HQ from 1990 to 1993. Before joining the ADBI, he was a Visiting Fellow at the China Business Centre (CBC), Hong Kong Polytechnic University. He has published many articles on the PRC economy as well as on global socio-economic issues. Zhijun Zhao is professor and senior researcher of the Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS).
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Rate Regimes, Capital Flows and Crisis Prevention
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES, CAPITAL FLOWS AND CRISIS PREVENTION Sebastian Edwards Working Paper 8529 http://www.nber.org/papers/w8529 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 October 2001 This is a revised version of a paper prepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research Conference on “Economic and Financial Crises in Emerging Market Economies,” held in Woodstock, October 19-21, 2000. I have benefited from conversations with Ed Leamer. I thank Marty Feldstein for comments. The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily those of the National Bureau of Economic Research. © 2001 by Sebastian Edwards. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Exchange Rate Regimes, Capital Flows and Crisis Prevention Sebastian Edwards NBER Working Paper No. 8529 October 2001 JEL No. F1, F2, F3, F31, F33 ABSTRACT In this paper I analyze, within the context of the new “financial architecture,” the relationship between exchange rate regimes, capital flows and currency crises in emerging economies. The paper draws on lessons learned during the 1990s, and deals with some of the most important policy controversies that emerged after the Mexican, East Asian, Russian and Brazilian crises. I evaluate some recent proposals for reforming the international financial architecture that have emphasized exchange rate regimes and capital mobility. I discuss emerging markets’ ability to have floating exchange rate regime, and I analyze issues related to “dollarization.” Sebastian Edwards Anderson Graduate School of Business 110 Westwood Plaza UCLA Los Angeles, CA 90095 and NBER [email protected] 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Rate Regime: Does It Matter for Inflation?
    Exchange Rate Regime: Does it Matter for Inflation? Dosse Toulaboe Fort Hays State University Rory Terry Fort Hays State University This paper investigates the link between exchange rate regimes and inflation performance in developing countries. De facto classifications of exchange rate systems are first obtained by using different methodologies to assess the volatility of the observed nominal effective exchange rates. The empirical work on the linkage between exchange rate regimes and inflation is then undertaken by developing and estimating an expanded version of the conventional Philips curve model. Two major conclusions are reached on the basis of our results: (1) the rate of inflation is unambiguously positively linked to real exchange rate depreciation regardless of exchange rate arrangement and, more specifically, (2) that the rate of inflation is much more responsive to the real exchange rate levels in the flexible rate systems than in the fixed regimes, suggesting that the former regime is more inflationary. INTRODUCTION Since the breakdown of the Bretton Woods and the resulting uncertainty regarding what represents an appropriately valued currency and how it can be achieved, the economic performance of many developing countries has been greatly challenged. The importance and degree of what is at stake is evidenced by the wide variety of exchange rate regimes adopted by different countries, ranging from fully pegged to fully flexible – with a broad array of intermediate systems. The logic behind the search for the “right” exchange rate regime is that it matters for economic performance such as inflation and output. In fact, the impact of inflation on economic growth and other macro variables is a serious concern that warrants economic policies to ensure their stability.1 The economic and social costs of inflation, and the emerging view that even moderate rates of inflation are harmful to economic efficiency and growth, generated a renewed interest for a need to design sustained and more prudent strategies to secure a reasonable rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Rate Regimes for the Acceccion Countries
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Buiter, Willem; Grafe, Clemens Article Anchor, float or abandon ship: Exchange rate regimes for the acceccion countries EIB Papers Provided in Cooperation with: European Investment Bank (EIB), Luxembourg Suggested Citation: Buiter, Willem; Grafe, Clemens (2002) : Anchor, float or abandon ship: Exchange rate regimes for the acceccion countries, EIB Papers, ISSN 0257-7755, European Investment Bank (EIB), Luxembourg, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 51-71 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/44812 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Anchor, float or abandon ship: Exchange rate regimes for the Accession countries 1. Introduction This paper investigates the appropriate exchange rate regimes, both prior to and following European Union accession, for those former centrally planned Central and Eastern European countries that are currently candidates for full membership in the European Union (1).
    [Show full text]