DOCSLIB.ORG

12004 TPS Amendment Report P31 P44.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
12004 TPS Amendment Report P31 P44.Indd Shire of Roebourne Town Planning Scheme No. 8 Amendment No. 30 APPENDIX B ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT KARRATHA LAZY LANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared for: TME Report Date: 24 September 2012 Version: 1 Report No. 2012-50 CONTENTS Contents ............................................................................................................................................................. i List of Attachments .......................................................................................................................................... iv 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................ 1 2 REGIONAL DATA ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.1 Geology and Soils .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Acid Sulphate Soils Risk ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Biogeography ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2.5 Botanical District ............................................................................................................................... 4 3 DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Flora ................................................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Threatened Ecological Communities ................................................................................................. 5 3.3 Fauna ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3.4 Protected Matters Search Tool ......................................................................................................... 7 3.5 Commonwealth Lands ..................................................................................................................... 10 4 SITE P13 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 11 4.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Past and Present Land Use .............................................................................................................. 11 4.3 Topography ..................................................................................................................................... 11 4.4 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................. 12 4.5 Vegetation and Flora ....................................................................................................................... 12 4.6 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 13 4.7 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................... 13 4.7.1 Aboriginal heritage .................................................................................................................. 13 4.7.2 European Heritage................................................................................................................... 13 4.8 Environmental Impact of Development .......................................................................................... 13 5 SITE P17 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 14 5.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 14 5.2 Past and Present Land Use .............................................................................................................. 14 5.3 Topography ..................................................................................................................................... 14 10097_002_jh V1.docx i 5.4 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................. 15 5.5 Vegetation and Flora ....................................................................................................................... 15 5.6 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 16 5.7 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................... 16 5.7.1 Aboriginal heritage .................................................................................................................. 16 5.7.2 European Heritage................................................................................................................... 16 5.8 Environmental Impact of Development .......................................................................................... 16 6 SITE P28 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 17 6.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Past and Present Land Use .............................................................................................................. 17 6.3 Topography ..................................................................................................................................... 17 6.4 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................. 17 6.5 Vegetation and Flora ....................................................................................................................... 18 6.6 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 19 6.7 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................... 19 6.7.1 Aboriginal heritage .................................................................................................................. 19 6.7.2 European Heritage................................................................................................................... 19 6.8 Environmental Impact of Development .......................................................................................... 19 7 SITE P31 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 20 7.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 20 7.2 Past and Present Land Use .............................................................................................................. 20 7.3 Topography ..................................................................................................................................... 20 7.4 Surface Drainage ............................................................................................................................. 20 7.5 Vegetation and Flora ....................................................................................................................... 21 7.6 Fauna ............................................................................................................................................... 22 7.7 Heritage ........................................................................................................................................... 22 7.7.1 Aboriginal heritage .................................................................................................................. 22 7.7.2 European Heritage................................................................................................................... 22 7.8 Environmental Impact of Development .......................................................................................... 22 8 SITE P44 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................... 24 8.1 Site Location .................................................................................................................................... 24 8.2 Past
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seed Ecology Iii
    SEED ECOLOGY III The Third International Society for Seed Science Meeting on Seeds and the Environment “Seeds and Change” Conference Proceedings June 20 to June 24, 2010 Salt Lake City, Utah, USA Editors: R. Pendleton, S. Meyer, B. Schultz Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Preface Extended abstracts included in this proceedings will be made available online. Enquiries and requests for hardcopies of this volume should be sent to: Dr. Rosemary Pendleton USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station Albuquerque Forestry Sciences Laboratory 333 Broadway SE Suite 115 Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA 87102-3497 The extended abstracts in this proceedings were edited for clarity. Seed Ecology III logo designed by Bitsy Schultz. i June 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah Proceedings of the Seed Ecology III Conference Table of Contents Germination Ecology of Dry Sandy Grassland Species along a pH-Gradient Simulated by Different Aluminium Concentrations.....................................................................................................................1 M Abedi, M Bartelheimer, Ralph Krall and Peter Poschlod Induction and Release of Secondary Dormancy under Field Conditions in Bromus tectorum.......................2 PS Allen, SE Meyer, and K Foote Seedling Production for Purposes of Biodiversity Restoration in the Brazilian Cerrado Region Can Be Greatly Enhanced by Seed Pretreatments Derived from Seed Technology......................................................4 S Anese, GCM Soares, ACB Matos, DAB Pinto, EAA da Silva, and HWM Hilhorst
    [Show full text]
  • For Review Only Journal: the Rangeland Journal
    The Rangeland Journal Proximate causes and possible adapt ive functions of mast seeding and barren flower shows in arid spinifex grasses (Triodia spp.) For Review Only Journal: The Rangeland Journal Manuscript ID: RJ13104 Manuscript Type: Research paper Date Submitted by the Author: 11-Oct-2013 Complete List of Authors: Wright, Boyd; Northern Territory Herbarium, Zuur, Alain; Highland Statistics, Chan, Gary; University of Queensland, Spinifex associations, Arid plant ecology, Fire ecology, Native grasslands, Keyword: Plant adaptation Note: The following files were submitted by the author for peer review, but cannot be converted to PDF. You must view these files (e.g. movies) online. Fig1.doc http://www.publish.csiro.au/journals/trj Page 1 of 40 The Rangeland Journal 1 Proximate causes and possible adaptive functions of 2 mast seeding and barren flower shows in arid spinifex 3 grasses ( Triodia spp.) A,B,E C D 4 Boyd R. Wright , Alain F. Zuur , Gary C.K. Chan 5 AAlice Springs Herbarium, Northern Territory Department of Land and 6 Resource Management.For Review Only 7 BSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, The University of Queensland, 8 Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia. 9 CHighland Statistics, Ltd., 6 Laverock Rd. Newburgh AB41 6AA, UK. 10 DSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, 11 Australia. 12 ECorresponding author. Email: 13 Running Head: Proximate and adaptive causes of masting in spinifex grasses 14 Summary text: Arid Triodia grasses are masting plants that occur in regions 15 where episodic wildfires occur after fuel accumulations following high rainfall 16 periods. We conducted a herbarium-based study and found that Triodia 17 reproduction is driven by precipitation over 12 months, and that high-yield 18 years corresponded to years of high fire likelihood.
    [Show full text]
  • Koolan Island Quoll Demographics & Genetics
    Running head: Conservation status of the Olive Python Final report GENETIC SURVEY OF THE PILBARA OLIVE PYTHON (Liasis olivaceaus barroni) David Pearson1, Peter Spencer2 Mia Hillyer2 and Ric A. How3 1Science Division, Department of Parks and Wildlife PO Box 51, Wannerooo, WA 6946 2School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150 3Department of Terrestrial Zoology (Vertebrates), Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew St, Welshpool, WA 6986 September, 2013 Olive python – final report 1 Running head: Conservation status of the Olive Python Summary • The study used genetic information to investigate differences between and within populations of olive pythons in the Pilbara. This information was compared with genetic profiles from olive pythons form the Kimberley and carpet pythons. • Genetic variation was examined at eight nuclear genes (microsatellite) from 47 individual olive pythons. • Genetic analyses of nuclear markers show that the Pilbara olive python contains low levels of diversity, compared with its Kimberley counterpart. • The Pilbara population also had a low effective population size, but showed no signatures of a genetic bottleneck as a result of a population crash. • Nuclear DNA markers identified two distinct olive python populations. One in the Pilbara and the other in the Kimberley. • Mitochondrial analysis at three diagnostic regions showed two distinct clades representing Pilbara and Kimberley olive pythons, exclusively, consistent with results from nuclear markers. • Overall olive pythons appear to have two Evolutionary Significant Units. The Pilbara unit appear to be less genetically diverse than Kimberley one and shows little phylogeographic structure within the Pilbara. • There is sufficient evidence from the data that the taxonomy of the two groups should be subject to a re-appraisal, the Kimberley and Pilbara Olive pythons sufficiently different to be considered as different species.
    [Show full text]
  • Of a Different Feather: Two New Species of Featherheads from the Ptilotus Macrocephalus (Amaranthaceae) Complex
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany, 2019, 32,61–70 https://doi.org/10.1071/SB18065 Of a different feather: two new species of featherheads from the Ptilotus macrocephalus (Amaranthaceae) complex Timothy A. Hammer A,C, Robert W. Davis B and Kevin R. Thiele A ASchool of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. BWestern Australian Herbarium, Science and Conservation, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Ptilotus macrocephalus (R.Br.) Poir. (Amaranthaceae), commonly known as a featherhead, isa widespread and common species in many parts of Australia. In the present study, we assess morphological variation in P. macrocephalus throughout its geographic range and provide evidence for the recognition of two new species, namely, P. psilorhachis T.Hammer & R.W.Davis and P. xerophilus T.Hammer & R.W.Davis. Geospatial analyses indicated that these new species are partitioned ecologically and geographically. Additional keywords: Australia, biogeography, ecology, taxonomy. Received 30 October 2018, accepted 8 April 2019, published online 8 May 2019 Introduction T. pachocephalum and T. fusiforme sensu Lindley (in Mitchell Ptilotus R.Br. comprises ~120 species, all of which are native to 1848) to be conspecific (including them under P. pachocephalus mainland Australia, with one species (P. conicus R.Br.) also (Moq.) F.Muell.). Bentham (1870) recognised the similarity of occurring on the Lesser Sunda Islands and the Aru Islands, and Ptilotus and Trichinium, but, nevertheless, maintained them as one (P. spathulatus (R.Br.) Poir.) occurring in Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001-2002 (PDF
    2001 2002 Annual report NSW national Parks & Wildlife service Published by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220 Copyright © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002 ISSN 0158-0965 Coordinator: Christine Sultana Editor: Catherine Munro Design and layout: Harley & Jones design Printed by: Agency Printing Front cover photos (from top left): Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS); Bouddi National Park (J Winter/NPWS); Banksias, Gibraltar Range National Park Copies of this report are available from the National Parks Centre, (P Green/NPWS); Launch of Backyard Buddies program (NPWS); Pacific black duck 102 George St, The Rocks, Sydney, phone 1300 361 967; or (P Green); Beyers Cottage, Hill End Historic Site (G Ashley/NPWS). NPWS Mail Order, PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220, phone: 9585 6533. Back cover photos (from left): Python tree, Gossia bidwillii (P Green); Repatriation of Aboriginal remains, La Perouse (C Bento/Australian Museum); This report can also be downloaded from the NPWS website: Rainforest, Nightcap National Park (P Green/NPWS); Northern banjo frog (J Little). www.npws.nsw.gov.au Inside front cover: Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS). Annual report 2001-2002 NPWS mission G Robertson/NPWS NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Aboriginal heritage 46 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 47 Customers, partners and stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • Tesis Amarilla, Leonardo David.Pdf (5.496Mb)
    Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales Estudio Poblacional y Filogenético en Munroa (Poaceae, Chloridoideae) Lic. Leonardo David Amarilla Tesis para optar al grado de Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas Directora: Dra. Ana M. Anton Co-Director: Dr. Jorge O. Chiapella Asesora de Tesis: Dra. Victoria Sosa Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal CONICET-UNC Córdoba, Argentina 2014 Comisión Asesora de Tesis Dra. Ana M. Anton, IMBIV, Córdoba. Dra. Noemí Gardenal, IDEA, Córdoba. Dra. Liliana Giussani, IBODA, Buenos Aires. Defensa Oral y Pública Lugar y Fecha: Calificación: Tribunal evaluador de Tesis Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... “Tengamos ideales elevados y pensemos en alcanzar grandes cosas, porque como la vida rebaja siempre y no se logra sino una parte de lo que se ansía, soñando muy alto alcanzaremos mucho más” Bernardo Alberto Houssay A mis padres y hermanas Quiero expresar mi más profundo agradecimiento a mis directores de tesis, la Dra. Ana M. Anton y el Dr. Jorge O. Chiapella, por todo lo que me enseñaron en cuanto a sistemática y taxonomía de gramíneas, por sus consejos, acompañamiento y dedicación. De la misma manera, quiero agradecer a la Dra. Victoria Sosa (INECOL A.C., Veracruz, Xalapa, México) por su acompañamiento y por todo lo que me enseñó en cuando a filogeografía y genética de poblaciones. Además quiero agradecer… A mis compañeros de trabajo: Nicolás Nagahama, Raquel Scrivanti, Federico Robbiati, Lucia Castello, Jimena Nores, Marcelo Gritti. A los curadores y equipo técnico del Museo Botánico de Córdoba. A la Dra. Reneé Fortunato. A la Dra. Marcela M. Manifesto. A la Dra.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Hilliana X Stellaticeps
    WATTLE Acacias of Australia Acacia hilliana Maiden x Acacia stellaticeps Kodela, Tindale & D.Keith Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com B.R. Maslin B.R. Maslin Source: W orldW ideW attle ver. 2. Published at: w w w .w orldw idew attle.com See illustration. Family Fabaceae Distribution Scattered in north-western W.A. from the NW edge of the Pilbara region N to Anna Plains Stn, adjacent to Eighty Mile Beach. Description Spreading, multistemmed, resinous, glabrous shrub 0.3–0.4 m high and 1–2 m across, ±flat-topped or low-domed, not noticeably aromatic. Bark grey. Branchlets obscurely tuberculate, obscurely ribbed. Phyllodes solitary or occasionally 2 or 3 in clusters, mostly linear to narrowly oblong, acute with innocuous to coarsely pungent points, 15–30 (–35) mm long, (1–) 1.5–2.5 (–3) mm wide, flat, rather wide spreading, mostly straight or shallowly recurved, often finely longitudinally wrinkled when dry, dull green to sub-glaucous; longitudinal nerves 3 to numerous, very obscure; gland obscure, 0.5–2 mm above pulvinus. Inflorescences simple, erect; peduncles 10–25 (–30) mm long; spikes obloid to short cylindrical, 10–15 mm long, golden.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetable Gardening Vegetable Gardening
    TheThe AmericanAmerican GARDENERGARDENER® The Magazine of the American Horticultural Society January / February 2009 Vegetable Gardening tips for success New Plants and TTrendsrends for 2009 How to Prune Deciduous Shrubs Sweet Rewards of Indoor Citrus Confidence shows. Because a mistake can ruin an entire gardening season, passionate gardeners don’t like to take chances. That’s why there’s Osmocote® Smart-Release® Plant Food. It’s guaranteed not to burn when used as directed, and the granules don’t easily wash away, no matter how much you water. Better still, Osmocote feeds plants continuously and consistently for four full months, so you can garden with confidence. Maybe that’s why passionate gardeners have trusted Osmocote for 40 years. Looking for expert advice and answers to your gardening questions? Visit PlantersPlace.com — a fresh, new online gardening community. © 2007, Scotts-Sierra Horticulture Products Company. World rights reserved. www.osmocote.com contents Volume 88, Number 1 . January / February 2009 FEATURES DEPARTMENTS 5 NOTES FROM RIVER FARM 6 MEMBERS’ FORUM 8 NEWS FROM AHS Renee’s Garden sponsors 2009 Seed Exchange, Stanley Smith Horticultural Trust grant funds future library at River Farm, AHS welcomes new members to Board of Directors, save the date for the 17th annual National Children & Youth Garden Symposium in July. 42 ONE ON ONE WITH… Bonnie Harper-Lore, America’s roadside ecologist. page 14 44 GARDENER’S NOTEBOOK All-America Selections winners for 2009, scientists discover new plant hormone, NEW PLANTS AND TRENDS FOR 2009 BY DOREEN G. HOWARD 14 Massachusetts Horticultural Society forced Get a sneak peek at some of the exciting plants that will hit the to cancel one of market this year, along with expert insight on garden trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Survey June 2018
    Burrup Peninsula Interconnector Pipeline Flora and Fauna Survey June 2018 Prepared for DDG Operations Pty Ltd Report Reference: 21244-18-BISR-1Rev0_180803 This page has been left blank intentionally. Burrup Peninsula Interconnector Pipeline Flora and Fauna Survey Prepared for DDG Operations Pty Ltd Job Number: 21244-18 Reference: 21244-18-BISR-1Rev0_180803 Revision Status Rev Date Description Author(s) Reviewer B. Jeanes A 20/07/2018 Draft Issued for Client Review H. Warrener J. Atkinson J. Johnston B. Jeanes 0 03/08/2018 Final Issued for Information H. Warrener J. Atkinson J. Johnston Approval Rev Date Issued to Authorised by Name Signature A 20/07/2018 M. Goodwin R. Archibald 0 03/08/2018 M. Goodwin S. Pearse © Copyright 2018 Astron Environmental Services Pty Ltd. All rights reserved. This document and information contained in it has been prepared by Astron Environmental Services under the terms and conditions of its contract with its client. The report is for the clients use only and may not be used, exploited, copied, duplicated or reproduced in any form or medium whatsoever without the prior written permission of Astron Environmental Services or its client. DDG Operations Pty Ltd Burrup Peninsula Interconnector Pipeline – Flora and Fauna Survey, June 2018 Abbreviations Abbreviation Definition Astron Astron Environmental Services BAM Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 DBNGP Dampier Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline DBCA Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions DEC Department of Environment and Conservation
    [Show full text]
  • Robe River Limited 1.3
    Clearing Permit Decision Report 1. Application details 1.1. Permit application details Permit application No.: 8319/1 Permit type: Purpose Permit 1.2. Proponent details Proponent’s name: Robe River Limited 1.3. Property details Property: Iron Ore (Robe River) Agreement Act 1964, Mineral Lease 248SA (AML 70/248) Local Government Area: Shire of Ashburton Colloquial name: Puluru 1.4. Application Clearing Area (ha) No. Trees Method of Clearing For the purpose of: 110 Mechanical Removal Mineral Exploration, Hydrogeological Investigations and Associated Activities. 1.5. Decision on application Decision on Permit Application: Grant Decision Date: 18 April 2019 2. Site Information 2.1. Existing environment and information 2.1.1. Description of the native vegetation under application Vegetation Description The vegetation of the application area is broadly mapped as Beard vegetation association 82: Hummock grassland, low tree steppe; Snappy Gum (Eucalyptus leucophloia) over Triodia wiseana (GIS Database). A flora and vegetation survey was conducted over the application area by Biota Environmental Services during July 2018. The following vegetation units were recorded within the application area (Biota, 2018): Vegetation of River Systems and Drainages R1: EcEvMaAtrCYPvCYa Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. refulgens, E. victrix, Melaleuca argentea closed forest over Acacia trachycarpa tall open shrubland over Cyperus vaginatus open sedgeland and Cymbopogon ambiguus scattered tussock grasses. R2: EcEvMgAtrCYPvEUaTHtERItCYa Eucalyptus camaldulensis subsp. refulgens, E. victrix woodland over Melaleuca glomerata, Acacia trachycarpa tall shrubland over Cyperus vaginatus, very open sedgeland and Eulalia aurea, Themeda triandra, Eriachne tenuiculmis, Cymbopogon ambiguus very open tussock grassland. R3: AtrERIt Acacia trachycarpa tall shrubland over Eriachne tenuiculmis scattered tussock grasses. Vegetation of Gorges and Gullies G1: CfPHbTHt Corymbia ferriticola low woodland over Phyllanthus baccatus scattered tall shrubs over Themeda triandra very open tussock grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Acacia Inaequilatera Domin
    Acacia inaequilatera Domin Identifiants : 196/acaina Association du Potager de mes/nos Rêves (https://lepotager-demesreves.fr) Fiche réalisée par Patrick Le Ménahèze Dernière modification le 29/09/2021 Classification phylogénétique : Clade : Angiospermes ; Clade : Dicotylédones vraies ; Clade : Rosidées ; Clade : Fabidées ; Ordre : Fabales ; Famille : Fabaceae ; Classification/taxinomie traditionnelle : Règne : Plantae ; Sous-règne : Tracheobionta ; Division : Magnoliophyta ; Classe : Magnoliopsida ; Ordre : Fabales ; Famille : Fabaceae ; Genre : Acacia ; Synonymes : In the past often confused with Acacia pyrifoli ; Nom(s) anglais, local(aux) et/ou international(aux) : baderi , Partirri ; Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Rapport de consommation et comestibilité/consommabilité inférée (partie(s) utilisable(s) et usage(s) alimentaire(s) correspondant(s)) : Données absentes/manquantes et/ou insuffisantesµ{{{(dp*)µ. Les graines vertes sont consommées néant, inconnus ou indéterminés.néant, inconnus ou indéterminés. Illustration(s) (photographie(s) et/ou dessin(s)): Autres infos : dont infos de "FOOD PLANTS INTERNATIONAL" : Distribution : Il pousse dans les zones arides. Il convient aux climats chauds et secs. Il a besoin d'un sol bien drainé et d'une Page 1/2 position ensoleillée{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : It grows in arid areas. It suits hot dry climates. It needs a well drained soil and a sunny position{{{0(+x). Localisation : Australie*{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : Australia*{{{0(+x). Notes : Il existe environ 1350 espèces d'Acacia. Plus de 1 000 se produisent en Australie. Aussi comme Mimosaceae{{{0(+x) (traduction automatique). Original : There are about 1,350 Acacia species. Over 1,000 occur in Australia. Also as Mimosaceae{{{0(+x).
    [Show full text]
  • Palatability of Plants to Camels (DBIRD NT)
    Technote No. 116 June 2003 Agdex No: 468/62 ISSN No: 0158-2755 The Palatability of Central Australian Plant Species to Camels Dr B. Dorges, Dr J. Heucke, Central Australian Camel Industry Association and R. Dance, Pastoral Division, Alice Springs BACKGROUND About 600,000 camels (Camelus dromedarius) are believed to inhabit the arid centre of Australia, mainly in South Australia, Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Most of these camels are feral. A small camel industry has developed, which harvests selected animals for domestic and export markets, primarily for meat. Camels can eat more than 80% of the common plant species found in Central Australia. Some plant species are actively sought by camels and may need to be protected. METHOD Observations of grazing preferences by camels were made periodically for up to 12 years on five cattle stations in Central Australia. Where camels were accustomed to the presence of humans, it was possible to observe their grazing preferences from a few metres. Radio transmitters were fitted on some camels for easy detection and observation at any time. These evaluations were used to establish a diet preference or palatability index for observed food plants. Table 1. Palatability index for camels Index Interpretation 1 only eaten when nothing else is available 2 rarely eaten 3 common food plant 4 main food plant at times 5 preferred food plant 6 highly preferred food plant 7 could be killed by camel browsing More information can be obtained from the web site of the Central Australian Camel Industry Association http://www.camelsaust.com.au 2 RESULTS Table 2.
    [Show full text]