DOCSLIB.ORG

Track ID Brochure.Pub

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Track ID Brochure.Pub Because furbearing animals are primarily nocturnal SQUIRREL MUSKRAT RACCOON and are naturally secretive, often the only signs of their Squirrel tracks are very similar to rabbit tracks as Muskrat tracks show long, slender toes on front and Probably the easiest tracks to identify are those of a presence are tracks left on their nightly travels. they both hop, with the hind tracks landing ahead of the hind feet. Five toes appear on the hind imprint but raccoon. The front footprints show the long finger-like An ability to identify animal tracks greatly increases front tracks. A squirrel places its front paws side-by- generally only four on the front. The fifth toe is present toes that resemble a miniature human handprint. our enjoyment and knowledge of animal activity. side, while a rabbit’s front paws are in a line. but is generally too small to show. The muskrat often Because the raccoon walks flat-footed, the large sole on Unfortunately, there are no precise formulas or laws to drags its tail, leaving a mark. its hind feet often shows clearly. follow in track identification. Hopping Hind Front Always take into account the type and the condition 1.3” Front Walking 2.5” 3” of the material in which the track is found. Such varying 4” 6-20” conditions as mud, hard dirt, sand, or deep, drifting, or Hind Walking thawing snow make it difficult to find a distinct track. A 2-3’ 1.6” Front track from the same animal is much larger in mud than 3” Hind in dry, hard dirt. Do not rely only on track size for STRIPED SKUNK PORCUPINE positive identification. A small coyote may leave the Skunks walk flat-footed. Their hind footprints The tracks of a porcupine are usually accompanied same size print as a large fox. An animal also will leave resemble tracks of a barefooted human being. Skunks by a distinct scuff mark caused by dragging the tail. Toe RIVER OTTER a different pattern of tracks when it walks than when it often travel in short, shuffling steps. pads are usually not seen in tracks, though claw marks River otters have large webbed feet, though runs or bounds. are common. The tracks often appear rough in texture. sometimes the webbing is hard to see in a track. Other A good tracker is constantly on the alert for such 1.5” common track features include a tail drag or smoothed Front clues as hair, droppings, and other signs of animal 5-6” Walking path caused by sliding down stream banks and through activity. 1.7” Walking Front snow. 1.9” Hind Walking 2.5” COTTONTAIL RABBIT 2.7” Hind 17” BADGER Cottontail tracks reflect the hopping gait of these 3” Badger tracks are wide and appear blocky. The long species—about 3 feet in length—with the hind tracks 19” front claws often leave indentations about three quarters usually landing in front of the front tracks. Foot pads BEAVER of an inch in front of the toe imprints. The front and claws are usually indistinct as the feet are Beaver tracks show a large, webbed hind foot that footprints turn in slightly because badgers walk pigeon- completely haired. usually covers the smaller front footprint. Marks from WEASEL toed. the tail being dragged are also common. Weasel tracks resemble mink tracks but are generally 1.25” Hopping Front Walking 3” 3.5” smaller. A running weasel leaves a line of twin prints. 3” Front Both weasel and mink prints may show irregular spacing 3’ Beaver-chewed because of the animals’ habit of jumping—one short Front Hind stump jump, followed by a long jump, and so forth. 3.5” Hind 9-10” 5” Hind 0.5” Front JACKRABBIT 0.6” Hind Jackrabbit tracks are usually longer than they are OPOSSUM wide, with impressions from the hair on their feet visi- The hind tracks of an opossum show “big toes” that ble. A running jackrabbit leaves tracks of its hind feet MINK slant inward or backward. The three middle toes tend to ahead of the front feet because jackrabbits are primarily Mink tracks are round and often appear fuzzy. They Gallop stay in a tight group. hoppers. usually show five toe and claw imprints, although the Right inner toe will not always show. Walking 1.5” Front Gallop 1.7” Front 1.7” Front 7” 7-12’ Right 8-30” Hind 5” 1.8” Hind Bounding 2” Hind 14” Make your own tracks! SWIFT FOX DOMESTIC DOG Swift fox tracks usually appear in a line and may be Dog tracks are often confused with those of fox and TRACK confused with cat tracks. Smaller than coyote tracks and coyote, but dog tracks are round. Often a perfect circle is lacks the raised transverse bar seen on the heel pads of formed inside the imprint around the rear edges of the red foxes. toes and the front edge of the heel pad. Four claws IDENTIFICATION generally show in the imprint. The dog’s front footprint Front Walking 1.7” is wider than it is long. Unlike the fox and coyotes, dogs OF COMMON have a slanted gait when running, so the tracks do not appear in a straight line. Larger dog tracks are also Hind 1.3” 14” sometimes confused with those of a mountain lion. SOUTH DAKOTA However, mountain lions have retractable claws and RED FOX claw marks are very rarely seen in their tracks, unlike FURBEARERS Red fox tracks usually appear in a line. Individual dog tracks. footprints are oval with tiny toe pads. Under some Walking conditions, marks are left by the hair between the toes. Red fox possess a raised transverse bar on the heel pads, often the only part of the heel that leaves an imprint. Because of this, the pad appears as a narrow bar. Trotting 2.5” Front 9-11” 2” Hind MOUNTAIN LION When walking, lions usually put their hind paw in the COYOTE imprint made by their front paw. They have four toes. Coyote tracks show the two outer toes of the hind Claw marks are not normally visible since their claws feet being longer than the inner toes. The two inner toes are retractable. A distinctive characteristic of mountain on the front imprint slant toward each other. Toenail lion tracks is the “tri-lobed” pad. Some call this the “m” marks may show but are not as pronounced as those in shape. Also, the third toe of a lion seems to extend out dog tracks. Individual tracks are longer than they are slightly longer than the others. wide. Walking 3.5” Front 2.5” Front Trotting 3.25” Hind 12-14” 3’ 2.25” Hind DOMESTIC CAT BOBCAT Domestic cat tracks may be confused with those of Bobcat tracks resemble domestic cats’ tracks, but are the mink. Cats, however, have four toes. Cats walk with larger with a greater distance between tracks. The bobcat their claws retracted, leaving no claw marks. All cats are www.projectwildsd.info has a three-lobed pattern on the rear of the heel pads. considered “precise walkers” in that their hind feet step Like all cats, the bobcat walks with its claws retracted, Reprinted with permission from Project WILD; Project WILD K-12 into the tracks left by their front feet. Curriculum & Activity Guide © Copyright 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, leaving no claw marks. 2000, 1992, 1985, and 1983; Council for Environmental Education. The Walking complete Activity Guide can be obtained by attending a Project WILD Walking workshop. For more information, please contact Chad Tussing, Project WILD Coordinator, South Dakota GFP, at (605) 773-2541 SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF ([email protected]) or the Project WILD National Office at (713) 520- 1” 7-8” 1936, or visit the organization’s national web site, www.projectwild.org. 2” 9-13” GAME, FISH AND PARKS .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MINNESOTA MUSTELIDS Young
    By Blane Klemek MINNESOTA MUSTELIDS Young Naturalists the Slinky,Stinky Weasel family ave you ever heard anyone call somebody a weasel? If you have, then you might think Hthat being called a weasel is bad. But weasels are good hunters, and they are cunning, curious, strong, and fierce. Weasels and their relatives are mammals. They belong to the order Carnivora (meat eaters) and the family Mustelidae, also known as the weasel family or mustelids. Mustela means weasel in Latin. With 65 species, mustelids are the largest family of carnivores in the world. Eight mustelid species currently make their homes in Minnesota: short-tailed weasel, long-tailed weasel, least weasel, mink, American marten, OTTERS BY DANIEL J. COX fisher, river otter, and American badger. Minnesota Conservation Volunteer May–June 2003 n e MARY CLAY, DEMBINSKY t PHOTO ASSOCIATES r mammals a WEASELS flexible m Here are two TOM AND PAT LEESON specialized mustelid feet. b One is for climb- ou can recognize a ing and the other for hort-tailed weasels (Mustela erminea), long- The long-tailed weasel d most mustelids g digging. Can you tell tailed weasels (M. frenata), and least weasels eats the most varied e food of all weasels. It by their tubelike r which is which? (M. nivalis) live throughout Minnesota. In also lives in the widest Ybodies and their short Stheir northern range, including Minnesota, weasels variety of habitats and legs. Some, such as badgers, hunting. Otters and minks turn white in winter. In autumn, white hairs begin climates across North are heavy and chunky. Some, are excellent swimmers that hunt to replace their brown summer coat.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Land-Use Change Structures Carnivore Communities in Remaining Tallgrass Prairie
    Contemporary land-use change structures carnivore communities in remaining tallgrass prairie by Kyle Ross Wait B.S., Kansas State University, 2014 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Horticulture and Natural Resources College of Agriculture KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Adam A. Ahlers Copyright © Kyle Ross Wait 2017. Abstract The Flint Hills ecoregion in Kansas, USA, represents the largest remaining tract of native tallgrass prairie in North America. Anthropogenic landscape change (e.g., urbanization, agricultural production) is affecting native biodiversity in this threatened ecosystem. Our understanding of how landscape change affects spatial distributions of carnivores (i.e., species included in the Order ‘Carnivora’) in this ecosystem is limited. I investigated the influence of landscape structure and composition on site occupancy dynamics of 3 native carnivores (coyote [Canis latrans]; bobcat [Lynx rufus]; and striped skunk [Mephitis mephitis]) and 1 nonnative carnivore (domestic cat, [Felis catus]) across an urbanization gradient in the Flint Hills during 2016-2017. I also examined how the relative influence of various landscape factors affected native carnivore species richness and diversity. I positioned 74 camera traps across 8 urban-rural transects in the 2 largest cities in the Flint Hills (Manhattan, pop. > 55,000; Junction City, pop. > 31,000) to assess presence/absence of carnivores. Cameras were activated for 28 days in each of 3 seasons (Summer 2016, Fall 2016, Winter 2017) and I used multisession occupancy models and an information-theoretic approach to assess the importance of various landscape factors on carnivore site occupancy dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Striped Skunk Mephitis Mephitis
    Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis Other common names None Introduction Striped skunks are highly recognizable for their distinctive coloring and their ability to spray an extremely foul smelling substance when they feel threatened. Some folks may also recognize them as the inspiration for the Looney Tunes character Pepé le Pew. There are 11 different species in the skunk family, with 5 species residing throughout the United States, but only the striped skunk can be found in New York. Physical Description and Anatomy Striped skunks are about the size of an average domestic cat. Adults can Pepé le Pew weigh anywhere between 2 – 12 lbs (0.9 – 5.4 kg), and are 18 – 32 inches (45.7 – 81.3 cm) long, with the tail making up 7 – 11 inches (17.8 – 27.9 cm) of that length. They have a stout body, short legs, and a long, bushy tail. Each foot is equipped with five strong claws that are used for digging. The bold striping pattern of the glossy black and white fur is highly variable. This coloration is designed to serve as a warning to other species not to bother it, or they will suffer the consequences. Generally, the top of the head is white, which splits into two stripes of white down the back, divided by a stripe of black. The lower parts are black as well. Variations may result in individuals that are all white above and all black below, some other combination of stripes and patches, or almost solid white or black. Skunks have such bold coloration because they Picture showing variation in color patterns of striped skunk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red and Gray Fox
    The Red and Gray Fox There are five species of foxes found in North America but only two, the red (Vulpes vulpes), And the gray (Urocyon cinereoargentus) live in towns or cities. Fox are canids and close relatives of coyotes, wolves and domestic dogs. Foxes are not large animals, The red fox is the larger of the two typically weighing 7 to 5 pounds, and reaching as much as 3 feet in length (not including the tail, which can be as long as 1 to 1 and a half feet in length). Gray foxes rarely exceed 11 or 12 pounds and are often much smaller. Coloration among fox greatly varies, and it is not always a sure bet that a red colored fox is indeed a “red fox” and a gray colored fox is indeed a “gray fox. The one sure way to tell them apart is the white tip of a red fox’s tail. Gray Fox (Urocyon cinereoargentus) Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) Regardless of which fox both prefer diverse habitats, including fields, woods, shrubby cover, farmland or other. Both species readily adapt to urban and suburban areas. Foxes are primarily nocturnal in urban areas but this is more an accommodation in avoiding other wildlife and humans. Just because you may see it during the day doesn’t necessarily mean it’s sick. Sometimes red fox will exhibit a brazenness that is so overt as to be disarming. A homeowner hanging laundry may watch a fox walk through the yard, going about its business, seemingly oblivious to the human nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fur Harvester Digest 3 SEASON DATES and BAG LIMITS
    2021 Michigan Fur Harvester Digest RAP (Report All Poaching): Call or Text (800) 292-7800 Michigan.gov/Trapping Table of Contents Furbearer Management ...................................................................3 Season Dates and Bag Limits ..........................................................4 License Types and Fees ....................................................................6 License Types and Fees by Age .......................................................6 Purchasing a License .......................................................................6 Apprentice & Youth Hunting .............................................................9 Fur Harvester License .....................................................................10 Kill Tags, Registration, and Incidental Catch .................................11 When and Where to Hunt/Trap ...................................................... 14 Hunting Hours and Zone Boundaries .............................................14 Hunting and Trapping on Public Land ............................................18 Safety Zones, Right-of-Ways, Waterways .......................................20 Hunting and Trapping on Private Land ...........................................20 Equipment and Fur Harvester Rules ............................................. 21 Use of Bait When Hunting and Trapping ........................................21 Hunting with Dogs ...........................................................................21 Equipment Regulations ...................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Felis Silvestris, Wild Cat
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T60354712A50652361 Felis silvestris, Wild Cat Assessment by: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. 2015. Felis silvestris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T60354712A50652361. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T60354712A50652361.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information
    [Show full text]
  • Small Predator Impacts on Deer
    IMPACTS OF SMALL PREDATORS ON DEER TERRY BLANKENSHIP, Assistant Director, Welder Wildlife Foundation, P.O. Box 1400, Sinton, Tx 78387. Abstract: Predator size influences the type of prey taken. Generally, smaller predators rely on rabbits, rodents, birds, fruits, or insects. Food habit studies of several small predators indicate the presence of deer in the diet. Percentages of deer in the diet were larger in the north and northeast where variety of prey was lower. Studies conducted in the south and southeast generally found lower percentages of deer in the diets. Studies in the south indicate fawns were the age class of choice. Although food habit studies indicate the presence of deer in the diet, this does not show these predators have an impact on deer populations. The bobcat (Lynx rufus), gray fox diet of the smaller predators listed above (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), red fox(Vulpes and the impact they may have on a deer vulpes), and golden eagle (Aquila population or a particular age class of deer. chrysaetos) are several of the smaller predators that have the potential to take deer BOBCAT (Odocoileus spp.) or a certain age class of deer. Much of the research conducted on A compilation of bobcat food habit the impacts of small predators on deer relate studies indicate rabbits (Lepus spp., to the presence or amount found in the diet. Sylvilagus spp.) were the primary prey taken Research has identified major prey items for throughout their range. Deer were an each of these predators in different regions important prey item in the northeast and of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Monodelphis Domestica in the Opossum Λ Conservation Of
    Marsupial Light Chains: Complexity and Conservation of λ in the Opossum Monodelphis domestica This information is current as Julie E. Lucero, George H. Rosenberg and Robert D. Miller of September 29, 2021. J Immunol 1998; 161:6724-6732; ; http://www.jimmunol.org/content/161/12/6724 Downloaded from References This article cites 35 articles, 10 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/161/12/6724.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on September 29, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 1998 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. Marsupial Light Chains: Complexity and Conservation of l in the Opossum Monodelphis domestica1,2 Julie E. Lucero, George H. Rosenberg, and Robert D. Miller3 The Igl chains in the South American opossum, Monodelphis domestica, were analyzed at the expressed cDNA and genomic organization level, the first described for a nonplacental mammal.
    [Show full text]
  • Mink: Wildlife Notebook Series
    Mink The American mink (Neovison vison) and other fur bearing animals attracted trappers, traders, and settlers to Alaska from around the world. Some of the most valuable furbearers belong to the Mustelidae or weasel family, which includes the American mink. Other members of this family in Alaska include weasels, martens, wolverines, river otters, and sea otters. Mink are found in every part of the state with the exceptions of Kodiak Island, Aleutian Islands, the offshore islands of the Bering Sea, and most of the Arctic Slope. General description: A mink's fur is in prime condition when guard hairs are thickest. Mink are then a chocolate brown with some irregular white patches on the chin, throat, and belly. White patches are usually larger on females and often occur on the abdomen in the area of the mammary glands. Several albino mink have been reported from Alaska. Underfur is usually thick and wavy, not longer than an inch. It is dark gray to light brown in color with some suggestion of light and dark bands. The tail is one third to one fourth of the body length with slightly longer guard hairs than the body. As an adaptation to their aquatic lifestyle, their feet have semiwebbed toes and oily guard hairs tend to waterproof the animal. Adult males range in total length from 19 to 29 inches (48-74 cm). They may weigh from three to almost five pounds (1.4-2.3 kg). Females are somewhat smaller than males. Their movements are rapid and erratic as if they are always ready to either flee or pounce on an unwary victim.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulpes Vulpes) Evolved Throughout History?
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses Environmental Studies Program 2020 TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? Abigail Misfeldt University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Disclaimer: The following thesis was produced in the Environmental Studies Program as a student senior capstone project. Misfeldt, Abigail, "TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY?" (2020). Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses. 283. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/envstudtheses/283 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Environmental Studies Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Studies Undergraduate Student Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUMANS AND RED FOXES (VULPES VULPES) EVOLVED THROUGHOUT HISTORY? By Abigail Misfeldt A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The University of Nebraska-Lincoln In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Science Major: Environmental Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. David Gosselin Lincoln, Nebraska November 2020 Abstract Red foxes are one of the few creatures able to adapt to living alongside humans as we have evolved. All humans and wildlife have some id of relationship, be it a friendly one or one of mutual hatred, or simply a neutral one. Through a systematic research review of legends, books, and journal articles, I mapped how humans and foxes have evolved together.
    [Show full text]
  • STRIPED SKUNK Mephitis Mephitis
    WILDLIFE IN CONNECTICUT INFORMATIONAL SERIES EASTERN STRIPED SKUNK Mephitis mephitis Habitat: Fields, fencerows, wooded ravines and rocky Diet: Insects (especially grubs), small mammals, outcrops. May also be found under buildings, in culverts earthworms, snails, grains, nuts, fruits, reptiles, vegeta- and near garbage dumps. tion, amphibians, birds, eggs, carrion and garbage. Weight: 6 to 14 pounds. Length: 21 to 26 inches. Males are somewhat larger than females. Identification: The eastern striped skunk’s body is born between late April and early June. At three weeks covered with fluffy black fur. It has a narrow white stripe of age, young skunks open their eyes and begin up the middle of the forehead and a broad white area crawling. At seven weeks, they begin to venture out on the top of the head and neck, which usually divides with the female and are able to spray musk; they into two stripes continuing along the back. The long, usually disperse during the fall of their first year. Adult bushy tail is a mixture of white and black hairs. Some males are generally solitary except during the mating skunks have more white than black hairs. Skunks have season. a small head, small eyes and a pointed snout. Their History in Connecticut: The eastern striped skunk is short legs and flat-footed gait makes them appear to adaptable to a wide range of habitats but prefers areas waddle when they walk. Sharp teeth and long claws of open fields with low, brushy vegetation. Early enable them to dig in soil or sod and pull apart rotten farming in Connecticut probably increased the suitability logs in search of food.
    [Show full text]
  • LCFPD Track Identification and Walking Gaits
    Track Identification Cat Rabbit ➢ 4 toes on each foot ➢ 4 toes on each foot ➢ round tracks ➢ oval tracks ➢ no claw marks ➢ front of skid has claw marks ➢ hind paws narrower ➢ almost impossible to see pads Dog, Fox, Coyote Raccoon ( Dog family) ➢ 5 toes on each foot ➢ 4 toes on each foot ➢ toes close together ➢ tracks maple leaf shaped or egg shaped ➢ toes long and finger shaped ➢ claw marks appear ➢ claw marks appear ➢ front feet larger Weasel, Skunk, Mink Opossum (Weasel Family) ➢ 5 toes on each foot ➢ 5 toes on each foot ➢ toes spread widely ➢ toes close together ➢ toes long and finger shaped ➢ toes short and round ➢ no claw mark on hind thumbs ➢ some partially webbed Mice, Squirrels, etc. (Rodent Family) Deer ➢ 4 toes on front feet, 5 toes on hind ➢ 2 toes on each foot feet ➢ tracks are paired when bounding ➢ front feet show dew claws ➢ hind feet step in fore feet ➢ size of track is important in separating species tracks ➢ may leave tail mark Walking Gaits Pace Diagonal Walk (Raccoon) (Dog Family, Cat, Deer, Opossum) Move both left feet together, Left front, right hind, right then both right feet front, left hind Bound Gallop (Weasel Family) (Rodent Family, Rabbit) Move both front feet together, Move both feet together, then then both hind feet move both hind feet Place hind feet behind front feet Place hind feet ahead of front feet .
    [Show full text]