Therapeutic Targeting of Autoreactive B Cells: Why, How, and When?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Primary Sjogren Syndrome: Focus on Innate Immune Cells and Inflammation
Review Primary Sjogren Syndrome: Focus on Innate Immune Cells and Inflammation Chiara Rizzo 1, Giulia Grasso 1, Giulia Maria Destro Castaniti 1, Francesco Ciccia 2 and Giuliana Guggino 1,* 1 Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Rheumatology Section, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche 2, 90110 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (G.M.D.C.) 2 Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via L. De Crecchio 7, 80138 Naples, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-091-6552260 Received: 30 April 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 3 June 2020 Abstract: Primary Sjogren Syndrome (pSS) is a complex, multifactorial rheumatic disease that mainly targets salivary and lacrimal glands, inducing epithelitis. The cause behind the autoimmunity outbreak in pSS is still elusive; however, it seems related to an aberrant reaction to exogenous triggers such as viruses, combined with individual genetic pre-disposition. For a long time, autoantibodies were considered as the hallmarks of this disease; however, more recently the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity as well as the consequent inflammatory process have emerged as the main mechanisms of pSS pathogenesis. The present review will focus on innate cells and on the principal mechanisms of inflammation connected. In the first part, an overview of innate cells involved in pSS pathogenesis is provided, stressing in particular the role of Innate Lymphoid Cells (ILCs). Subsequently we have highlighted the main inflammatory pathways, including intra- and extra-cellular players. -
Autoimmunity and Organ Damage in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
REVIEW ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-0677-6 Autoimmunity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus George C. Tsokos ✉ Impressive progress has been made over the last several years toward understanding how almost every aspect of the immune sys- tem contributes to the expression of systemic autoimmunity. In parallel, studies have shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to organ inflammation and damage. New approaches that address the complicated interaction between genetic variants, epigen- etic processes, sex and the environment promise to enlighten the multitude of pathways that lead to what is clinically defined as systemic lupus erythematosus. It is expected that each patient owns a unique ‘interactome’, which will dictate specific treatment. t took almost 100 years to realize that lupus erythematosus, strongly to the heterogeneity of the disease. Several genes linked to which was initially thought to be a skin entity, is a systemic the immune response are regulated through long-distance chroma- Idisease that spares no organ and that an aberrant autoimmune tin interactions10,11. Studies addressing long-distance interactions response is involved in its pathogenesis. The involvement of vital between gene variants in SLE are still missing, but, with the advent organs and tissues such as the brain, blood and the kidney in most of new technologies, such studies will emerge. patients, the vast majority of whom are women of childbearing age, Better understanding of the epigenome is needed to under- impels efforts to develop diagnostic tools and effective therapeu- stand how it supplements the genetic contribution to the dis- tics. The prevalence ranges from 20 to 150 cases per 100,000 peo- ease. -
Pathophysiology of Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura: a Bird's-Eye View
Egypt J Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2014;12(2):49-61. Review article Pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a bird's-eye view. Amira Abdel Moneam Adly Pediatrics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt ABSTRACT and B lymphocytes (including T-helper, T- Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is a cytotoxic, and T-regulatory lymphocytes) 6. common autoimmune disorder resulting in isolated The triggering event for ITP is unknown7, but thrombocytopenia. It is a bleeding disorder continued research is providing new insights into characterized by low platelet counts due to decreased the underlying immunopathogenic processes as well platelet production as well as increased platelet as the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved destruction by autoimmune mechanisms. ITP can in megakaryocytopoiesis and platelet turnover. present either alone (primary) or in the setting of other Although historically ITP-associated thrombo- conditions (secondary) such as infections or altered cytopenia was attributed solely to increased rates of immune states. ITP is associated with a loss of destruction of antibody- coated platelets, it has tolerance to platelet antigens and a phenotype of become evident that suboptimal platelet production accelerated platelet destruction and impaired platelet also plays a role 8. production. Although the etiology of ITP remains Bleeding is due to decreased platelet production unknown, complex dysregulation of the immune as well as accelerated platelet destruction mediated system is observed in ITP patients. Antiplatelet in part by autoantibody-based destruction antibodies mediate accelerated clearance from the mechanisms9. Most autoantibodies in ITP are circulation in large part via the reticuloendothelial isotype switched and harbor somatic mutations10, (monocytic phagocytic) system. -
Molecules with Specificity for Cd45 and Cd79 Moleküle Mit Cd45- Und Cd79-Spezifizität Molécules Présentant Une Spécificité Vis-À-Vis De Cd45 Et Cd79
(19) *EP003169704B1* (11) EP 3 169 704 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: C07K 16/28 (2006.01) 29.07.2020 Bulletin 2020/31 (86) International application number: (21) Application number: 15738655.8 PCT/EP2015/066368 (22) Date of filing: 16.07.2015 (87) International publication number: WO 2016/009029 (21.01.2016 Gazette 2016/03) (54) MOLECULES WITH SPECIFICITY FOR CD45 AND CD79 MOLEKÜLE MIT CD45- UND CD79-SPEZIFIZITÄT MOLÉCULES PRÉSENTANT UNE SPÉCIFICITÉ VIS-À-VIS DE CD45 ET CD79 (84) Designated Contracting States: • WRIGHT, Michael John AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB Slough GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO Berkshire SL1 3WE (GB) PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR • TYSON, Kerry Designated Extension States: Slough BA ME Berkshire SL1 3WE (GB) Designated Validation States: MA (74) Representative: UCB Intellectual Property c/o UCB Celltech (30) Priority: 16.07.2014 GB 201412659 IP Department 208 Bath Road (43) Date of publication of application: Slough, Berkshire SL1 3WE (GB) 24.05.2017 Bulletin 2017/21 (56) References cited: (73) Proprietor: UCB Biopharma SRL WO-A1-2011/025904 WO-A1-2013/085893 1070 Brussels (BE) • GOLD ET AL.: "The B Cell Antigen Receptor (72) Inventors: Activates the AKT/Glycogegn Synthase Kinase-3 • FINNEY, Helene Margaret Signalling Pathway via Phosphatydilinositol Slough 3-Kinase", J. IMMUNOLOGY, vol. 163, 1999, Berkshire SL1 3WE (GB) pages 1894-1905, XP002745175, • RAPECKI, Stephen Edward Slough Berkshire SL1 3WE (GB) Note: Within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent in the European Patent Bulletin, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to that patent, in accordance with the Implementing Regulations. -
B Cell Activation and Escape of Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive B Cells
cells Review B Cell Activation and Escape of Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive B Cells Carlo G. Bonasia 1 , Wayel H. Abdulahad 1,2 , Abraham Rutgers 1, Peter Heeringa 2 and Nicolaas A. Bos 1,* 1 Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, GZ, The Netherlands; [email protected] (C.G.B.); [email protected] (W.H.A.); [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 Groningen, GZ, The Netherlands; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Autoreactive B cells are key drivers of pathogenic processes in autoimmune diseases by the production of autoantibodies, secretion of cytokines, and presentation of autoantigens to T cells. However, the mechanisms that underlie the development of autoreactive B cells are not well understood. Here, we review recent studies leveraging novel techniques to identify and characterize (auto)antigen-specific B cells. The insights gained from such studies pertaining to the mechanisms involved in the escape of tolerance checkpoints and the activation of autoreactive B cells are discussed. Citation: Bonasia, C.G.; Abdulahad, W.H.; Rutgers, A.; Heeringa, P.; Bos, In addition, we briefly highlight potential therapeutic strategies to target and eliminate autoreactive N.A. B Cell Activation and Escape of B cells in autoimmune diseases. Tolerance Checkpoints: Recent Insights from Studying Autoreactive Keywords: autoimmune diseases; B cells; autoreactive B cells; tolerance B Cells. Cells 2021, 10, 1190. https:// doi.org/10.3390/cells10051190 Academic Editor: Juan Pablo de 1. -
Mechanisms Governing Anaphylaxis: Inflammatory Cells, Mediators
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Mechanisms Governing Anaphylaxis: Inflammatory Cells, Mediators, Endothelial Gap Junctions and Beyond Samantha Minh Thy Nguyen 1, Chase Preston Rupprecht 2, Aaisha Haque 3, Debendra Pattanaik 4, Joseph Yusin 5 and Guha Krishnaswamy 1,3,* 1 Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA; [email protected] 2 The Rowan School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ 08084, USA; [email protected] 3 The Bill Hefner VA Medical Center, Salisbury, NC 27106, USA; [email protected] 4 Division of Allergy and Immunology, UT Memphis College of Medicine, Memphis, TN 38103, USA; [email protected] 5 The Division of Allergy and Immunology, Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90011, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Anaphylaxis is a severe, acute, life-threatening multisystem allergic reaction resulting from the release of a plethora of mediators from mast cells culminating in serious respiratory, cardiovascular and mucocutaneous manifestations that can be fatal. Medications, foods, latex, exercise, hormones (progesterone), and clonal mast cell disorders may be responsible. More recently, novel syndromes such as delayed reactions to red meat and hereditary alpha tryptasemia have been described. Anaphylaxis manifests as sudden onset urticaria, pruritus, flushing, erythema, Citation: Nguyen, S.M.T.; Rupprecht, angioedema (lips, tongue, airways, periphery), myocardial dysfunction (hypovolemia, distributive -
B Cell Checkpoints in Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases
REVIEWS B cell checkpoints in autoimmune rheumatic diseases Samuel J. S. Rubin1,2,3, Michelle S. Bloom1,2,3 and William H. Robinson1,2,3* Abstract | B cells have important functions in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, including autoimmune rheumatic diseases. In addition to producing autoantibodies, B cells contribute to autoimmunity by serving as professional antigen- presenting cells (APCs), producing cytokines, and through additional mechanisms. B cell activation and effector functions are regulated by immune checkpoints, including both activating and inhibitory checkpoint receptors that contribute to the regulation of B cell tolerance, activation, antigen presentation, T cell help, class switching, antibody production and cytokine production. The various activating checkpoint receptors include B cell activating receptors that engage with cognate receptors on T cells or other cells, as well as Toll-like receptors that can provide dual stimulation to B cells via co- engagement with the B cell receptor. Furthermore, various inhibitory checkpoint receptors, including B cell inhibitory receptors, have important functions in regulating B cell development, activation and effector functions. Therapeutically targeting B cell checkpoints represents a promising strategy for the treatment of a variety of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Antibody- dependent B cells are multifunctional lymphocytes that contribute that serve as precursors to and thereby give rise to acti- cell- mediated cytotoxicity to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases -
Difference Between Hypersensitivity and Autoimmunity Key Difference – Hypersensitivity Vs Autoimmunity
Difference Between Hypersensitivity and Autoimmunity www.differencebetwee.com Key Difference – Hypersensitivity vs Autoimmunity Autoimmunity is an adaptive immune response mounted against self-antigens. In simple terms, when your body is acting against its own cells and tissues, this is called an autoimmune reaction. An exaggerated and inappropriate immune response to an antigenic stimulus is defined as a hypersensitivity reaction. Unlike autoimmune reactions that are triggered only by the endogenous antigens, hypersensitivity reactions are triggered by both endogenous and exogenous antigens. This is the key difference between hypersensitivity and autoimmunity. What is Hypersensitivity? An exaggerated and inappropriate immune response to an antigenic stimulus is defined as a hypersensitivity reaction. The first exposure to a particular antigen activates the immune system and, antibodies are produced as a result. This is called sensitization. Subsequent exposures to the same antigen give rise to hypersensitivity. Few important facts regarding the hypersensitivity reactions are given below They can be elicited by both exogenous and endogenous agents. They are a result of an imbalance between the effector mechanisms and the countermeasures that are there to control any inappropriate execution of an immune response. The presence of a genetic susceptibility increases the likelihood of hypersensitivity reactions. The manner in which hypersensitivity reactions harm our body is similar to the way that the pathogens are destroyed by immune reactions. Figure 01: Allergy According to the Coombs and Gell classification, there are four main types of hypersensitivity reactions. Type I- Immediate Type/ Anaphylactic Mechanism Vasodilation, edema, and contraction of smooth muscles are the pathological changes that take place during the immediate phase of the reaction. -
Molecular Design, Optimization and Genomic Integration of Chimeric B
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/516369; this version posted June 5, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Molecular design, optimization and genomic integration of chimeric B cell 2 receptors in murine B cells 3 4 Theresa Pesch1, Lucia Bonati1, William Kelton1, Cristina Parola1,2, Roy A Ehling1, Lucia 5 Csepregi1, Daisuke Kitamura3, Sai T ReDDy1,* 6 7 1 Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zürich, Basel 4058, Switzerland 8 2 Life Science Graduate School, Systems Biology, ETH Zürich, University of Zurich, Zurich 8057, 9 Switzerland 10 3 Research Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Japan 11 *To whom corresponDence shoulD be aDDresseD. Tel: +41 61 387 33 68; Email: [email protected] 12 Key worDs: B cells, synthetic antigen receptor, cellular engineering, genome eDiting, cellular 13 immunotherapy, CRISPR-Cas9 14 15 Abstract 16 Immune cell therapies baseD on the integration of synthetic antigen receptors proviDe 17 a powerful strategy for the treatment of Diverse Diseases, most notably retargeting 18 T cells engineereD to express chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) for cancer therapy. In 19 aDDition to T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes may also represent valuable immune cells 20 that can be engineereD for therapeutic purposes such as protein replacement therapy 21 or recombinant antiboDy proDuction. In this article, we report a promising concept for 22 the molecular Design, optimization anD genomic integration of a novel class of 23 synthetic antigen receptors, chimeric B cell receptors (CBCR). -
Cd79b Expression in B Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Its Implication for Minimal Residual Disease Detection
Leukemia (1999) 13, 1501–1505 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0887-6924/99 $15.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/leu CD79b expression in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: its implication for minimal residual disease detection JA Garcia Vela, I Delgado, L Benito, MC Monteserin, L Garcia Alonso, N Somolinos, MA Andreu and F On˜a Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain The surface expression of CD79b, using the monoclonal anti- antigen expression and antigen overexpression) in order to body (Mab) CB3–1, on B lymphocytes from normal individuals establish the applicability of immunophenotypic aberrances and patients with B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) for monitoring MRD as in acute leukemias with a sensitivity has been analyzed using triple-staining cells for flow cytome- −4 try. In addition, the clinical significance of CD79b expression level of 10 (one aberrant CLL cell among 10000 normal in CLL patients and its possible value for the evaluation of mini- cells). We have previously published that CD5 is overex- mal residual disease (MRD) was explored. A total of 15 periph- pressed in most CLL cases.2 This aberrantly CD5high/CD19+ eral blood (PB) samples from healthy blood donors, five bone expression was present in 90% of our CLL. Dilutional experi- marrow (BM) samples from normal donors and 40 PB samples ments showed that CD5high/CD19+ were identified at fre- from CLL untreated patients were included in the study. In −4 addition we studied the expression of CD79b in B lymphocytes quencies as low as 10 . from five CLL patients after fludarabine treatment in order to Recently, different groups have communicated that CD79b support our method. -
Autoantibody Development Under Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors Emma C
Published OnlineFirst November 13, 2018; DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0245 Cancer Immunology Miniature Cancer Immunology Research Autoantibody Development under Treatment with Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors Emma C. de Moel1, Elisa A. Rozeman2, Ellen H. Kapiteijn3, Els M.E. Verdegaal3, Annette Grummels4,JaapA.Bakker4, Tom W.J. Huizinga1, John B. Haanen2,3, Rene E.M. Toes1, and Diane van der Woude1 Abstract Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) activate the and any irAEs [OR, 2.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) immune system to assault cancer cells in a manner that is 0.85–10.01]. Patients with antithyroid antibodies after ipi- not antigen specific. We hypothesized that tolerance may limumab had significantly more thyroid dysfunction under also be broken to autoantigens, resulting in autoantibody subsequent anti–PD-1 therapy: 7/11 (54.6%) patients with formation, which could be associated with immune-related antithyroid antibodies after ipilimumab developed thyroid adverse events (irAEs) and antitumor efficacy. Twenty-three dysfunction under anti–PD1 versus 7/49 (14.3%) patients common clinical autoantibodies in pre- and posttreatment without antibodies (OR, 9.96; 95% CI, 1.94–51.1). Patients sera from 133 ipilimumab-treated melanoma patients were who developed autoantibodies showed a trend for better determined, and their development linked to the occurrence survival (HR for all-cause death: 0.66; 95% CI, 0.34–1.26) of irAEs, best overall response, and survival. Autoantibodies and therapy response (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 0.85–8.16). We developed in 19.2% (19/99) of patients who were autoan- conclude that autoantibodies develop under ipilimumab tibody-negative pretreatment. -
Tests for Autoimmune Diseases Test Codes 249, 16814, 19946
Tests for Autoimmune Diseases Test Codes 249, 16814, 19946 Frequently Asked Questions Panel components may be ordered separately. Please see the Quest Diagnostics Test Center for ordering information. 1. Q: What are autoimmune diseases? A: “Autoimmune disease” refers to a diverse group of disorders that involve almost every one of the body’s organs and systems. It encompasses diseases of the nervous, gastrointestinal, and endocrine systems, as well as skin and other connective tissues, eyes, blood, and blood vessels. In all of these autoimmune diseases, the underlying problem is “autoimmunity”—the body’s immune system becomes misdirected and attacks the very organs it was designed to protect. 2. Q: Why are autoimmune diseases challenging to diagnose? A: Diagnosis is challenging for several reasons: 1. Patients initially present with nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, joint and muscle pain, fever, and/or weight change. 2. Symptoms often flare and remit. 3. Patients frequently have more than 1 autoimmune disease. According to a survey by the Autoimmune Diseases Association, it takes up to 4.6 years and nearly 5 doctors for a patient to receive a proper autoimmune disease diagnosis.1 3. Q: How common are autoimmune diseases? A: At least 30 million Americans suffer from 1 or more of the 80 plus autoimmune diseases. On average, autoimmune diseases strike three times more women than men. Certain ones have an even higher female:male ratio. Autoimmune diseases are one of the top 10 leading causes of death among women age 65 and under2 and represent the fourth-largest cause of disability among women in the United States.3 Women’s enhanced immune system increases resistance to infection, but also puts them at greater risk of developing autoimmune disease than men.