DOCSLIB.ORG

Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association for Margaux Meyer the Purpose of Informing Lawyers About Current Issues Relating to the Defense of Civil Actions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association for Margaux Meyer the Purpose of Informing Lawyers About Current Issues Relating to the Defense of Civil Actions COMPLIMENTARY MINNESOTA FALL 2020 QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: PAST AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AT THE (UNCERTAIN?) FUTURE INTERSECTION OF MINN. STAT. § 541.051 AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY ACTIONS STAYING POWER: WHAT KEEPS WOMEN PRACTICING LAW? MDLA OFFICERS and DIRECTORS PRESIDENT Matt Thibodeau The President’s Column 302 W. Superior St. #800 By Matt Thibodeau 3 Duluth, MN 55802 (218) 722-0073 Articles from Past Issues 4 VICE PRESIDENT Anthony J. Novak 30 E Seventh St #2800 Join a Committee 4 St. Paul MN 55101 (651) 312-6500 Qualified Immunity: Past and (Uncertain?) Future TREASURER By Andrew Wolf and Timothy Sullivan 5-10 Tammy Reno 610 Ottawa Avenue North Minneapolis, MN 55422 Recent Developments at the Intersection of Minn. Stat. § (612) 522-2040 541.051 and Products Liability Actions SECRETARY Brendan Tupa By Louise A. Behrendt 11-16 701 Xenia Ave. S. Ste. 220 Golden Valley MN 55416 Staying Power: What Keeps Women Practicing Law? (763) 546-8444 By Lauren Nuffort, Kelly Sofio, and Elizabeth Sorenson Brotten 17-20 PRESIDENT EMERITUS Benjamin D. McAninch 127 S. Second St. MDLA Congratulates 22 Mankato, MN 56002 (507) 345-1166 DRI Corner DIRECTORS By Richard Scattergood 23 Chris Angell Tessa McEllistrem St. Paul Lake Elmo Stephanie Angolkar Jessica Ommen Bloomington Appleton Rachel Beauchamp Michael Rowley Minnetonka Minneapolis Steve Erffmeyer Amie Penny Sayler Minneapolis Minneapolis Andrea Hoversten Elizabeth Sorenson St. Paul Brotten Cally Kjellberg-Nelson Minneapolis St. Cloud Katie Storms Minneapolis PAST PRESIDENTS 1974|75: Richard R. Quinlivan (deceased) | 1975|76: Paul Q. O’Leary | 1976|77: G. Alan Cunningham (deceased) | 1977|78: Richard P. Mahoney | 1978|79: William T. Egan (deceased) | 1979|80: James D. Cahill (deceased) | 1980|81: Clyde F. Anderson | 1981|82: George S. Roth (deceased) | 1982|83: Tyrone P. Bujold | 1983|84: Martin N. Burke (deceased) | 1984|85: Richard L. Pemberton | 1985|86: Lynn G. Truesdell | 1986|87: Gene P. Bradt (deceased) | 1987|88: Phillip A. Cole | 1988|89: Thomas R. Thibodeau | 1989|90: Former Chief Justice Eric J. Magnuson | 1990|91: John M. Degnan | 1991|92: Lawrence R. King (deceased) | 1992|93: Michael J. Ford (deceased) | 1993|94: The Honorable Dale B. Lindman (deceased) | 1994|95: The The Editorial Committee welcomes articles for publication in Minnesota Honorable Steve J. Cahill | 1995|96: Theodore J. Smetak | 1996|97: Rebecca Egge Moos | 1997|98: Richard J. Defense. If you are interested in writing an article, please contact one of Thomas | 1998|99: Nicholas Ostapenko | 1999|00: The the Chief Editors or call the MDLA office at 651-290-6293. Honorable John H. Scherer | 2000|01: Michael S. Ryan | 2001|02: The Hon. Kathryn Davis Messerich | 2002|03: Steven J. Pfefferle | 2003|04: Leon R. Erstad | 2004|05: CHIEF EDITORS EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Steven R. Schwegman | 2005|06: Gregory P. Bulinski | 2006|07: Patrick Sauter | 2007|08: Paul A. Rajkowski | 2008|09: Kay Elizabeth Tuveson | 2009|10: Thomas Sean J. Mickelson Rachel B. Beauchamp Benjamin C. Johnson Marshall | 2010|11: Patricia Y. Beety | 2011|12: Mark A. Solheim | 2012|13: Lisa R. Griebel | 2013|14: Mark A. Jeffrey R. Mulder Jonathan C. Marquet João C. Medeiros Fredrickson | 2014|15: Dyan J. Ebert | 2015|16: Richard Andrea E. Reisbord C. Scattergood | 2016|17: Troy A. Poetz | 2017|18: Jessica E. Schwie | 2018|19: Steven M. Sitek | 2019|20: Benjamin D. McAninch VOLUME 41, ISSUE 3 • FALL 2020 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Minnesota Defense is a regular publication of the Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association for Margaux Meyer the purpose of informing lawyers about current issues relating to the defense of civil actions. 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 252 St. Paul, MN 55114 All views, opinions and conclusions expressed in this magazine are those of the authors, and do (651) 288-3433 not necessarily reflect the opinion and/or policy of the editors, the Minnesota Defense Lawyers www.mdla.org Association or its leadership. e-mail: [email protected] The publication of any advertisement is not to be construed as an endorsement by Minnesota Defense, the Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association, or its leadership, of the product or service offered. All inquiries should be directed to MDLA, 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 252, St. Paul, MN 55114. © Copyright 2020 MDLA. All rights reserved. 2 MN DEFENSE s FALL 2020 THE PRESIDENT’S COLUMN Matt Thibodeau THIBODEAU, JOHNSON & FERIANCEK, PLLP I am excited to be MDLA’s president and look forward to Do you remember the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge on social serving our organization this year. My earliest memories of media? The ALS Ice Bucket Challenge swept the globe in the MDLA are attending large gatherings with my father 2014 as millions of people posed and posted pictures on Tom (who served as the MDLA President from 1988-1989) social media of themselves being doused with buckets of and my mother Mollie for mid-winter at Quadna Mountain ice-cold water. in Hill City and the Trial Techniques Seminar (TTS) in Tower Hall at the College of St. Scholastica in Duluth. I The George Floyd Challenge imitated the ALS Ice Bucket remember stories of multi-week trials, cross examinations Challenge. Fortunately, it only included some. Sadly, it of experts, camaraderie and lots of laughter. included Minnesotans. In the George Floyd Challenge, I saw white, teenage boys from Minnesota kneeling on each This year the pandemic cancelled our largest event — other’s necks posing and posting pictures on social media. TTS in Duluth. While the pandemic may continue to Smiling. impact our large gatherings, the MDLA still provides us benefits in our smaller, efficient committee meetings. Our As we watched the images on television and in the organization has 500 of the best civil defense lawyers in newspaper, we started talking about the events as a Minnesota actively engaged in 19 committees — please family, trying to explain to children ages 7 and 9 what we join one! were seeing. It was uncomfortable. We continued talking throughout the summer. Eventually, my 7-year-old said: My first committee involvement was MDLA’s Diversity “when are we going to be done talking about this?” I Committee. As is often the case, I joined with the intention didn’t know the answer. of giving to our organization and ended up receiving. I received perspective and insight from my MDLA The moment of silence at the Vikings opening game started colleagues. My committee involvement challenged me to the conversation in our house all over again. The kids explore areas that I never would have. For the first time, I couldn’t understand why everyone wasn’t supportive. We read Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” continued talking. Again, it was uncomfortable. from 1963, in which he writes: During the summer, I didn’t know the answer to my “I must confess that over the past few years I have been 7-year old’s question about “when are we going to be done gravely disappointed with the white moderate…who talking about this?” Today, I still don’t know the answer. is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive But re-reading the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, I do peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says know that I need to talk about it with my kids. I can’t wait ‘I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can’t agree with for a “more convenient season” to have the discussion. your methods of direct action’, who paternalistically feels As your President this year, my hope is that we can have he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom, who similar conversations as professionals and as people to lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the create equitable outcomes for our clients, our organization Negro to wait until a more convenient season”. and Minnesota. Unfortunately, the pandemic hasn’t been the only difficult issue we have faced as a state and a Nation. I also watched Minnesota struggle with George Floyd. I watched and listened with my family. MN DEFENSE s FALL 2020 3 ARTICLES FROM PAST ISSUES JOIN A COMMITTEE Members wishing to receive copies of articles from past MDLA committees provide great opportunities for learning issues of Minnesota Defense should forward a check made and discussion of issues and topics of concern with other payable to the Minnesota Defense Lawyers Association in members in similar practices. Activity in committees can vary the amount of $5 for postage and handling. In addition to from planning CLE programs, to working on legislation, to the articles listed below, articles dating back to Fall ‘82 are informal gatherings that discuss updated practice information available. Direct orders and inquiries to the MDLA office, or changes in the law. Serving on a committee is one of the 1000 Westgate Drive, Suite 252, St. Paul, MN 55114. best ways to become actively involved in the organization and increase the value of your membership. Summer 2020 COVID-19 in the Workplace — An Occupational Disease If you would like to join a committee’s distribution list, please Amy M. Byrne update your member profile on mdla.org specifying the The Rise of Modular Construction: Common Legal Issues appropriate committee under the “Practice Type” section. Janet G. Stellpflug, John F. Thomas and Eric H. Chadwick You will be automatically added to the distribution list. Why Women Want: An Analysis of Addiction in Females Jessie Sogge To learn more about an MDLA committee, please visit www. mdla.org. Meeting times and dates for each committee are Spring 2020 listed online. Mandatory Retirement Age Requirements Hannah Felix Committees available include: When Worker’s Compensation and Tort Law Collide Elizabeth Roff and Cindy Butler Same as It Ever Was: Lambertson Contribution in a Post-Fish v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson Sue K. Dosal, State Court Administrator Minnesota Judicial Branch 2007 Report to the Community
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Minnesota Judicial Branch 2007 Report to the Community Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson Sue K. Dosal, State Court Administrator 2007 Report to the Community From the Chief Justice On behalf of our dedicated staff and judges of the Minnesota Judicial Branch, we are pleased to offer this 2007 Report to the Community. In this report you will find many examples of innovation, of the challenges facing our courts, and of our efforts to make Minnesota’s courts, acclaimed internationally for efficiency and administrative and judicial excellence, even better. Minnesota’s trial and appellate courts were united and fully state funded in 2005, and a new governance body, the Judicial Council was created. We are using the benefit of this unification to improve efficiency across the system, reduce costs, enhance service to citizens, promote innovation, and share knowledge across the nearly 100 courts and work sites that make up the Minnesota Judicial Branch. In 2006, the Judicial Council adopted a strategic plan that established goals for the court system around three over-arching themes: (1) Improving Access to Justice; (2) Administering Justice for Effective Results; and (3) Ensuring Public Trust, Accountability and Impartiality. The strategic plan outlines 10 priorities for the 2007- 2009 time period that target court system resources toward advancement in these key areas. One of the most serious challenges facing the Judicial Branch involves our goal of preserving and enhancing public trust and confidence in the court system.
    [Show full text]
  • June 20, 2017 the Honorable Amy Klobuchar United States Senate
    June 20, 2017 The Honorable Amy Klobuchar The Honorable Al Franken United States Senate United States Senate 1200 Washington Avenue South, #250 60 Plato Boulevard, #220 Minneapolis, MN 55415 St. Paul, MN 55107 The Honorable Chuck Grassley The Honorable Diane Feinstein United States Senate United States Senate 135 Hart Senate Office Building 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Chuck Schumer United States Senate United States Senate 317 Russell Senate Office Building 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 Re: Nomination of Justice David Stras to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Dear Senators: The undersigned are Minnesota lawyers from all political walks of life who join in respectfully urging the Senate to confirm Justice David Stras’s nomination to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. (Signatories’ affiliations are provided for ease of identification and imply neither endorsement nor lack thereof by the affiliated organization.) In his seven years as a Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court, Justice Stras has distinguished himself not only as a top-notch jurist, but as a judge who decides cases without regard to political affiliation or party lines. He has sided with both “liberal” and “conservative” Justices during his tenure on the court, always in pursuit of applying the law as it comes to him, without ideology or favoritism. Justice Stras has also proven to be a collegial and collaborative judge, as three of his former colleagues on the Minnesota Supreme Court (retired Justices Alan Page, Helen Meyer, and Paul Anderson) explained in publicly endorsing him in a recent editorial in the Minneapolis StarTribune.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    OFFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM PAWLENTY 130 State Capitol ♦ Saint Paul, MN 55155 ♦ (651) 296-0001 NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung January 3, 2007 (651) 296-0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY APPOINTS KASBOHM TO FORENSIC LABORATORY ADVISORY BOARD Saint Paul – Governor Tim Pawlenty today announced the appointment of Lieutenant Brian Kasbohm, commander of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory, to the Forensic Laboratory Advisory Board. Prior to becoming commander of the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory, Kasbohm, of Chanhassen, held positions of laboratory supervisor, crime scene section supervisor, bloodstain pattern analyst, as well as over a decade of experience in the crime scene and latent fingerprint sections of the crime lab. He was also the project manager for the Hennepin County Sheriff’s Office Crime Laboratory accreditation with the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board. Kasbohm is a member of the American Society of Crime Lab Directors, Association of Forensic Quality Assurance Managers, and International Association of Bloodstain Pattern Analysts. Kasbohm is appointed to a position for an individual with expertise in the field of forensic science and will serve a four-year term that expires on July 1, 2010. The Forensic Laboratory Advisory Board was created by the Legislature (Laws of Minnesota 2006, Chapter 260, Article 3) to develop and implement a reporting system through which laboratories, facilities, or entities that conduct forensic analyses report negligence or misconduct that substantially affects the integrity of the forensic results committed by employees or contractors; encourage reporting of misconduct; investigate allegations of misconduct; and encourage laboratory accreditation with the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Sam Hanson of Counsel
    Sam Hanson Of Counsel 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 p: 612.977.8525 f: 612.977.8650 [email protected] Sam Hanson is a member of the firm's Business Litigation and PRACTICE AREAS Energy sections and Appellate practice group. After serving on the Business Litigation Minnesota Court of Appeals for two years and the Minnesota Appellate Representation Supreme Court for five years, he rejoined Briggs and Morgan. Sam is Alternative Dispute a former firm president, managing partner and vice president, as well Resolution (ADR) as former head of the Business Litigation section and a former Energy Litigation member of the board of directors. Sam practices principally in the Energy Law areas of: ● Arbitration and mediation INDUSTRIES Energy ● Complex civil litigation ● Appellate law EDUCATION William Mitchell College of ● Public utility regulation Law, LL.B, 1965, Cum Laude, With Honors Sam's representative cases include: St. Olaf College, B.A., ● Davies v. Waterstone Capital Management, LP, 856 N.W.2d 1961 711 (Minn. Ct. App. 2015) (further review denied, Minnesota Supreme Court; cert. denied U.S. Supreme Court); BAR & COURT successfully reversed district court decision and vacated ADMISSIONS arbitration award of $11 million arising from the termination of Minnesota a high performing trader for our hedge fund client. U.S. District Court District of Minnesota ● In Re Estate of Boyd, 2016 WL76444 (Minn. Ct. App. 2016); U.S. Court of Appeals 8th successfully reversed district court decision dismissing Circuit stepson’s objections to stepfather’s will, which did not honor U.S. Supreme Court the deceased mother’s wishes that her husband devise her previously separate property to her son after her husband’s CLERKSHIPS death.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 As Despite Budget Challenges and Other Judicial Branch with the Transfer of Our Judges and Court Personnel Constraints
    A Message From the Chief Justice The Minnesota Judicial Branch children with advocates in court ¶ Continuing the transformation of the enjoyed many milestones in 2003 as despite budget challenges and other Judicial Branch with the transfer of our judges and court personnel constraints. the Second (Ramsey County) and continue to focus on four strategic Fourth (Hennepin County) judicial ¶ Seeing concrete results from the areas: Access to Justice, Childrens districts from county to state funding. work of the Childrens Justice Justice, Technology, and Public Trust Initiative, the countrys first But we do not intend to rest on these and Confidence. These milestones statewide reform of the child accomplishments. The Judicial include: protection system. Branch continues to search for new ¶ Launching the Minnesota Court opportunities to better serve the public, Information System (MNCIS) in three more effectively target the problems counties and preparing to roll out that bring people into court in the first the system statewide. MNCIS will place, and use our budget as link court records, improving efficiently as ever. information sharing among courts The budget challenges faced by the and law enforcement agencies. state in 2003 have impacted the ¶ Reviewing initial data collected judiciary as well. Yet, we remain statewide that will help us assess committed to and focused on our racial disparities in the court system overriding responsibility our so we can work to eliminate them. constitutionally prescribed mission of We also marked the 10th resolving the more than 2 million anniversary of the judiciarys work disputes brought to our courts each toward erasing racial bias in our year.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDICIAL B1v\!'I;CH
    ~1l:"i.".;"<;(lT..\ JUDICIAL B1v\!'I;CH 2005 Annual Report A Year of Change OUR MISSION To provide justice through a system that assures equal access for the fair and timely resolution of cases and controversies. OUR VISION The general public and those who use the court system will refer to it as accessible, fair, consistent, responsive, free of discrimination, independent, and well managed. OUR CORE VALUES • Judicial independence and accountability • Equal justice, fair and respectful treatment of all • Customer focused – internally and externally • Accessible • Affordable quality - commitment to excellence and a quality of work environment • Commitment to effective communication • Predictability of procedures • Balance between individualized justice and predictability of outcome • Efficient • Innovative and self-analytical OUR STRATEGIC PRIORITIES • Improving citizens’ access to justice • Reforming the children’s justice system • Using technology more effectively • Maintaining public trust and confidence CONTENTS A Message from Chief Justice Russell A. Anderson ..……………………………........ 2 A Tribute to Chief Justice Kathleen A. Blatz ……………………………………............ 3 Completing the Transition to a Fully State-Funded Court System......................... 4 The Judicial Council.………................................................................................. 5 Improving Efficiency And Effectiveness In Court Operations…………….............… 6 100th Anniversary of Minnesota’s Juvenile Court................................................ 7 Reforming
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Proposed Amendments to the Minnesota Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards
    REPORT AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON RULES OF THE BOARD ON JUDICIAL STANDARDS C4-85-697 March 14, 2008 Honorable Gary J. Pagliaccetti, Chair Sen. Don Betzold Sharon Mohr Hon. Tanya Bransford Hon. Tom Neuville2 Felicia J. Boyd Amy Rotenberg Hon. Edward Cleary Patrick Sexton Annamarie Daley Rep. Steve Simon Hon. Sam Hanson Dane Smith Karen Janisch Rep. Steve Smith Jeff Johnson1 Virginia Stringer Robert M.A. Johnson William Wernz Jeremy Lane DePaul Willette Cmdr. Bill Martinez Hon. Bruce Willis Hon. Leslie Metzen Hon. Paul H. Anderson Supreme Court Liaison Kelly Lyn Mitchell Staff ________________ 1 Jeff Johnson resigned from the committee in January 2008. 2 Hon. Tom Neuville was a member of the Minnesota State Senate when he was appointed to the committee. He was appointed to the bench in January, 2008. INTRODUCTION The Advisory Committee on Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards was established on April 3, 2007, to review and recommend proposed changes to the Rules of the Board on Judicial Standards (see order establishing the committee in Appendix A). The committee met monthly from June 2007 to February 2008. The committee received public testimony at its first meeting (see Appendix D for list of presenters), welcomed and distributed additional written input throughout the course of the committee proceedings, and held a public forum to receive input regarding the recommendations set forth in this report on January 31, 2008 (see Appendix E for abstract of presentations made at the public hearing). The committee also sought advice and information about national trends in judicial discipline from Cynthia Gray, Director of the Center for Judicial Ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Elections of Justices to the Minnesota Supreme Court 1857 – 2016 ______
    RESULTS OF ELECTIONS OF JUSTICES TO THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT 1857 – 2016 ______ COMPILED BY DOUGLAS A. HEDIN 1. The Election Code The Minnesota Constitution, ratified by voters on October 13, 1857, imposed conditions on state judges that were far more restrictive than the standard for federal judges set by Article III, §1, of the U. S. Constitution. Rather than serve “during good behavior,” equivalent to “lifetime” employ- ment, judges on the state supreme court and lower courts were elected to short terms. Article 6, §3, provided: The judges of the supreme court shall be elected by the electors of the state at large, and their terms of office shall be seven years and until their successors are elected and qualified. The inclusion of a requirement of an elected judiciary in the 1857 constitution, besides being a reaction against the policy of presidential appointments to the court during the territorial period, 1 reflected the prevailing belief in the wisdom of the people; popularly-elected judges, it was supposed, would protect the rights and interests of the people; and a wayward judge could be checked at the next election. 2 Each judicial election since 1857 has been conducted according to an election code, which the legislature has amended, revised, reformed, and transformed many times. Unlike contests for executive and legislative 1 For the politics behind the selection of each of the eleven justices to the territorial supreme court, see my article, “‘Rotation in Office’ and the Territorial Supreme Court, 1849-1857” (MLHP, 2010). 2 Minnesota was not alone in requiring the election of its judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • HONORABLE SAM HANSON, Ret. Minneapolis, Minnesota
    HONORABLE SAM HANSON, ret. Minneapolis, Minnesota Sam is a former firm president and vice president, as well as a former head of the Business Litigation Section and a former member of the board of directors. After serving on the Minnesota Court of Appeals for two years and the Minnesota Supreme Court for five years, he rejoined Briggs’ Business Litigation Section and Energy Law Group, and is a member of the firm’s Appellate Practice Group. Sam practices principally in the areas of: • Arbitration and mediation • Complex civil litigation • Appellate law • Public utility regulation Sam's representative cases include: • Dew Corporation v. Mathwig Development Co., 2010 WL1541294, (Minn. Ct. App. 2010); successfully reversed district court decision and established priority of $32 million dollar mortgage lien against $8 million dollar mechanics lien for condominium development project. • In re denial of variance granted to Robert W. Hubbard , 778 N.W.2d 313 (Minn. 2010); successfully argued that DNR lacked statutory authority to deny certification of variance granted by municipality for construction on the St. Croix River. • Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles Cty. Bd ., 617 N.W.2d 566 (Minn. 2000); successfully overturned attempt of County Board to prevent utility’s upgrade to existing transmission lines by amending county’s zoning ordinance to change set-back requirements. • Northern States Power Co., Arbitration (1999); successfully defeated $50 million claim by Manitoba Hydro Electric Company for additional fees under an electric power agreement. Sam practiced law with Briggs and Morgan for 34 years before he was appointed to the Court of Appeals in 2000. He has had extensive experience in both the state and federal courts in Minnesota, as well as courts in many other states in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Minnesota Court of Appeals: Arguing To, and Limitations Of, A
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 35 | Issue 4 Article 10 2009 The innesotM a Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, an Error-correcting Court Sam Hanson Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Hanson, Sam (2009) "The inneM sota Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, an Error-correcting Court," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 35: Iss. 4, Article 10. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol35/iss4/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Hanson: The Minnesota Court of Appeals: Arguing to, and Limitations of, a THE MINNESOTA COURT OF APPEALS: ARGUING TO, AND LIMITATIONS OF, AN ERROR-CORRECTING COURT Sam Hanson† Assisted by Jonathan Schmidt†† and Tara Reese Duginske††† I. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 1262 II. HISTORY ................................................................................... 1264 III. PURPOSE AND FUNCTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS ......... 1267 IV. COURT OF APPEALS RECOGNIZES ITS LIMITATIONS AS AN ERROR-CORRECTING COURT .................................................. 1268 V. THE ERROR-CORRECTING LIMITATION APPLIES TO AREAS BEYOND THE COMMON LAW .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Distinguished Life & Work of the Honorable John E. Simonett
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 39 | Issue 3 Article 7 2013 The Distinguished Life & Work of the Honorable John E. Simonett: Justice Simonett & the Art of Judging Paul H. Anderson Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Anderson, Paul H. (2013) "The Distinguished Life & Work of the Honorable John E. Simonett: Justice Simonett & the Art of Judging," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 39: Iss. 3, Article 7. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol39/iss3/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Anderson: The Distinguished Life & Work of the Honorable John E. Simonett: THE DISTINGUISHED LIFE & WORK OF THE HONORABLE JOHN E. SIMONETT: JUSTICE SIMONETT & THE ART OF JUDGING† Moderator Tom Boyd Introduction Honorable Paul H. Anderson Presenters Honorable Alan C. Page Honorable Esther M. Tomljanovich Honorable Martha M. Simonett Diana Morrissey James Sheehy Chelsea Brennan DesAutels Nathan Sellers Tom Boyd: The title of the next panel is “Justice Simonett & the Art of Judging.” It will be moderated by Justice Paul Anderson. I have spoken with Justice Anderson about his plans for this part of the program, and I am still not entirely sure what he is going to do, but I think we should all expect something very dynamic and fluid. I think it will be reminiscent of what people used to do in the old days, something that I used to hear about from the 1960s—those things they called a “happening.” In any event, I think it will be very interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword Sam Hanson
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 32 | Issue 4 Article 15 2006 Foreword Sam Hanson Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Hanson, Sam (2006) "Foreword," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 32: Iss. 4, Article 15. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol32/iss4/15 This Prefatory Matter is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Hanson: Foreword 01FOREWORD.DOC 5/31/2006 1:05:13 PM FOREWORD The Honorable Sam Hanson† It is with great pleasure that I accept the invitation to introduce this volume of the William Mitchell Law Review, focusing on decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court for the 2004-2005 term. For the outside world, the most notable events of the term may have been the change in the composition of the court, with the departures of Justice Gilbert and Chief Justice Blatz, the arrivals of Justice Barry Anderson and Justice Gildea, and the elevation of Russell Anderson to Chief Justice. These changes in composition made life very interesting, but to those of us on the inside of the court, they are perhaps secondary to the frequently expressed perception that the cases we considered this term were increasingly complex and difficult. The cases chosen for comment in this issue provide strong evidence that this was a valid perception.
    [Show full text]