Testing with Groovy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Study on Functioning of Selenium Automation Testing Structure
Volume 7, Issue 5, May 2017 ISSN: 2277 128X International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering Research Paper Available online at: www.ijarcsse.com A Study on Functioning of Selenium Automation Testing Structure 1Jyoti Devi, 2Kirti Bhatia, 3Rohini Sharma* 1, 2 Sat Kabir Institute of Technology and College Management Bahadurgarh, Haryana, India 3 Jesus and Mary Delhi University Delhi, India DOI: 10.23956/ijarcsse/V7I5/0204 Abstract— In recent years, there is advancement in the field of software engineering, applications are getting automated. As the software is error prone, there should some easy and automated way to test the software application. It is very challenging to test such complicated web applications. Human intervention can be reduced by using automation tools. Selenium is an online web based software testing tool. In this article, we have study the design and functioning of the selenium tool and used it to test various online applications. In order to test an application, testers do need not to learn the selenium web driver tool completely. This tool is helpful for a developer and tester, they can analyse their code owing to screen shot characteristics of framework. It generates the adapted test report to the tester. It is very simple to sustain and restore the test suite for new version of the application by this tool. Keywords—Selenium; Automated Testing; Test Cases; Report Generation I. INTRODUCTION The objective of software testing is to discover faults and errors in a software application. Software testing utilizes more than 50 % time of software development lifecycle. Testing time depends upon the algorithm used, programming language, line of codes, function points, external and internal interfaces [1]. -
SHOW TEASE: It's Time for Security Now!. Steve Gibson Is Here. We're Going to Talk About the Strange Case of the Estonian ID Cards
Security Now! Transcript of Episode #642 Page 1 of 30 Transcript of Episode #642 BGP Description: This week we examine how Estonia handled the Infineon crypto bug; two additional consequences of the pressure to maliciously mine cryptocurrency; zero-day exploits in the popular vBulletin forum system; Mozilla in the doghouse over "Mr. Robot"; Win10's insecure password manager mistake; when legacy protocol come back to bite us; how to bulk-steal any Chrome user's entire stored password vault; and we finally know where and why the uber-potent Mirai botnet was created, and by whom. We also have a bit of errata and some fun miscellany. Then we're going to take a look at BGP, another creaky yet crucial - and vulnerable - protocol that glues the global Internet together. High quality (64 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/SN-642.mp3 Quarter size (16 kbps) mp3 audio file URL: http://media.GRC.com/sn/sn-642-lq.mp3 SHOW TEASE: It's time for Security Now!. Steve Gibson is here. We're going to talk about the strange case of the Estonian ID cards. A weird bug or actually flaw introduced into Microsoft's Windows 10. We're still not sure exactly who got it and why. We'll also talk about the case of the Firefox plugin promoting "Mr. Robot," and a whole lot more, all coming up next on Security Now!. Leo Laporte: This is Security Now! with Steve Gibson, Episode 642, recorded Tuesday, December 19th, 2017: BGP. It's time for Security Now!, the show where we cover your security online with this guy right here, the Explainer in Chief, Steve Gibson. -
Fast and Scalable Automation Framework : “Booster”
WHITEPAPER Fast and Scalable Automation Framework : “Booster” Testing is a form of software business insurance. More automation coverage means less risk. and that is good news for everyone. Sonal Pallewar Email : [email protected] “Automation Framework” and “Why do we need a framework for test automation?” A framework is a software solution that can be used in place of ordinary code that offers generic functions. Some of the challenges of automation are: ● Writing and maintaining test automation frameworks Booster– Linux based ● Scaling to high number of simultaneous tests in multithreaded various environments automation framework ● Reporting and analytics of large number of test results to assess test coverage and build quality ● Ease of use to extend and maintain the framework ● Rich libraries that can be leveraged for quick delivery of automation ”Booster” addresses the above challenges and is used to automate and test several web and mobile frontend applications as well as backend components by executing hundreds of simultaneous tests. Booster is a best-fit Linux based multithreaded automation framework that is fast, scalable and easily extensible. Booster also has readily available rich web, mobile, Linux libraries that can be leveraged to quickly build product specific tests without investing much time in interaction with web and mobile UI interfaces. 1 Need of Booster framework Linux Based Booster is a Linux based framework Supports remote execution of web tests Supports remote execution of tests in target environments with the help of paramiko python library. Supports frontend and backend automation Consists of a rich set of Selenium, mobile and Linux libraries Selenium Grid Supports serial and parallel execution of tests, Multi-platform support i.e. -
Silkperformer® 2010 R2 Release Notes Borland Software Corporation 4 Hutton Centre Dr., Suite 900 Santa Ana, CA 92707
SilkPerformer® 2010 R2 Release Notes Borland Software Corporation 4 Hutton Centre Dr., Suite 900 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Copyright 2009-2010 Micro Focus (IP) Limited. All Rights Reserved. SilkPerformer contains derivative works of Borland Software Corporation, Copyright 1992-2010 Borland Software Corporation (a Micro Focus company). MICRO FOCUS and the Micro Focus logo, among others, are trademarks or registered trademarks of Micro Focus (IP) Limited or its subsidiaries or affiliated companies in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. BORLAND, the Borland logo and SilkPerformer are trademarks or registered trademarks of Borland Software Corporation or its subsidiaries or affiliated companies in the United States, United Kingdom and other countries. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. ii Contents SilkPerformer Release Notes ..............................................................................4 What's New in SilkPerformer 2010 R2 ...............................................................5 Browser-Driven Load Testing Enhancements .......................................................................5 Enhanced Support for Large-Scale Load Testing .................................................................6 Support for Testing BlazeDS Server Applications .................................................................7 Support for Custom Terminal Emulation Screen Sizes .........................................................7 Graceful Disconnect for Citrix Sessions ................................................................................7 -
Unravel Data Systems Version 4.5
UNRAVEL DATA SYSTEMS VERSION 4.5 Component name Component version name License names jQuery 1.8.2 MIT License Apache Tomcat 5.5.23 Apache License 2.0 Tachyon Project POM 0.8.2 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Model 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 apache/incubator-heron 0.16.5.1 Apache License 2.0 Maven Plugin API 3.0.4 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Authentication Interceptor 2.0.0-M15 Apache License 2.0 Apache Directory LDAP API Extras ACI 1.0.0-M20 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.3.3 Apache License 2.0 Spark Project Tags 2.0.0-preview Apache License 2.0 Curator Testing 3.3.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache HttpComponents Core 4.4.5 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Apache License 2.0 classworlds 2.4 Apache License 2.0 abego TreeLayout Core 1.0.1 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License jackson-core 2.8.6 Apache License 2.0 Lucene Join 6.6.1 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons CLI 1.3-cloudera-pre-r1439998 Apache License 2.0 hive-apache 0.5 Apache License 2.0 scala-parser-combinators 1.0.4 BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License com.springsource.javax.xml.bind 2.1.7 Common Development and Distribution License 1.0 SnakeYAML 1.15 Apache License 2.0 JUnit 4.12 Common Public License 1.0 ApacheDS Protocol Kerberos 2.0.0-M12 Apache License 2.0 Apache Groovy 2.4.6 Apache License 2.0 JGraphT - Core 1.2.0 (GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later AND Eclipse Public License 1.0) chill-java 0.5.0 Apache License 2.0 Apache Commons Logging 1.2 Apache License 2.0 OpenCensus 0.12.3 Apache License 2.0 ApacheDS Protocol -
Adaptive LL(*) Parsing: the Power of Dynamic Analysis
Adaptive LL(*) Parsing: The Power of Dynamic Analysis Terence Parr Sam Harwell Kathleen Fisher University of San Francisco University of Texas at Austin Tufts University [email protected] [email protected] kfi[email protected] Abstract PEGs are unambiguous by definition but have a quirk where Despite the advances made by modern parsing strategies such rule A ! a j ab (meaning “A matches either a or ab”) can never as PEG, LL(*), GLR, and GLL, parsing is not a solved prob- match ab since PEGs choose the first alternative that matches lem. Existing approaches suffer from a number of weaknesses, a prefix of the remaining input. Nested backtracking makes de- including difficulties supporting side-effecting embedded ac- bugging PEGs difficult. tions, slow and/or unpredictable performance, and counter- Second, side-effecting programmer-supplied actions (muta- intuitive matching strategies. This paper introduces the ALL(*) tors) like print statements should be avoided in any strategy that parsing strategy that combines the simplicity, efficiency, and continuously speculates (PEG) or supports multiple interpreta- predictability of conventional top-down LL(k) parsers with the tions of the input (GLL and GLR) because such actions may power of a GLR-like mechanism to make parsing decisions. never really take place [17]. (Though DParser [24] supports The critical innovation is to move grammar analysis to parse- “final” actions when the programmer is certain a reduction is time, which lets ALL(*) handle any non-left-recursive context- part of an unambiguous final parse.) Without side effects, ac- free grammar. ALL(*) is O(n4) in theory but consistently per- tions must buffer data for all interpretations in immutable data forms linearly on grammars used in practice, outperforming structures or provide undo actions. -
Selenium Python Bindings Release 2
Selenium Python Bindings Release 2 Baiju Muthukadan Sep 03, 2021 Contents 1 Installation 3 1.1 Introduction...............................................3 1.2 Installing Python bindings for Selenium.................................3 1.3 Instructions for Windows users.....................................3 1.4 Installing from Git sources........................................4 1.5 Drivers..................................................4 1.6 Downloading Selenium server......................................4 2 Getting Started 7 2.1 Simple Usage...............................................7 2.2 Example Explained............................................7 2.3 Using Selenium to write tests......................................8 2.4 Walkthrough of the example.......................................9 2.5 Using Selenium with remote WebDriver................................. 10 3 Navigating 13 3.1 Interacting with the page......................................... 13 3.2 Filling in forms.............................................. 14 3.3 Drag and drop.............................................. 15 3.4 Moving between windows and frames.................................. 15 3.5 Popup dialogs.............................................. 16 3.6 Navigation: history and location..................................... 16 3.7 Cookies.................................................. 16 4 Locating Elements 17 4.1 Locating by Id.............................................. 18 4.2 Locating by Name............................................ 18 4.3 -
Lexing and Parsing with ANTLR4
Lab 2 Lexing and Parsing with ANTLR4 Objective • Understand the software architecture of ANTLR4. • Be able to write simple grammars and correct grammar issues in ANTLR4. EXERCISE #1 Lab preparation Ï In the cap-labs directory: git pull will provide you all the necessary files for this lab in TP02. You also have to install ANTLR4. 2.1 User install for ANTLR4 and ANTLR4 Python runtime User installation steps: mkdir ~/lib cd ~/lib wget http://www.antlr.org/download/antlr-4.7-complete.jar pip3 install antlr4-python3-runtime --user Then in your .bashrc: export CLASSPATH=".:$HOME/lib/antlr-4.7-complete.jar:$CLASSPATH" export ANTLR4="java -jar $HOME/lib/antlr-4.7-complete.jar" alias antlr4="java -jar $HOME/lib/antlr-4.7-complete.jar" alias grun='java org.antlr.v4.gui.TestRig' Then source your .bashrc: source ~/.bashrc 2.2 Structure of a .g4 file and compilation Links to a bit of ANTLR4 syntax : • Lexical rules (extended regular expressions): https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/blob/4.7/doc/ lexer-rules.md • Parser rules (grammars) https://github.com/antlr/antlr4/blob/4.7/doc/parser-rules.md The compilation of a given .g4 (for the PYTHON back-end) is done by the following command line: java -jar ~/lib/antlr-4.7-complete.jar -Dlanguage=Python3 filename.g4 or if you modified your .bashrc properly: antlr4 -Dlanguage=Python3 filename.g4 2.3 Simple examples with ANTLR4 EXERCISE #2 Demo files Ï Work your way through the five examples in the directory demo_files: Aurore Alcolei, Laure Gonnord, Valentin Lorentz. 1/4 ENS de Lyon, Département Informatique, M1 CAP Lab #2 – Automne 2017 ex1 with ANTLR4 + Java : A very simple lexical analysis1 for simple arithmetic expressions of the form x+3. -
Scraping Sites That Use Search Forms
Chapter 9 Scraping Sites that Don’t Want to be Scraped/ Scraping Sites that Use Search Forms Skills you will learn: Basic setup of the Selenium library, which allows you to control a web browser from a Python script. Filling out a form on a website and scraping the returned records. Introduction: Sometimes, websites throw up hurdles, deliberately or incidentally, that can make scraping more difficult. For example, they may place cookies on your computer containing values that must be resubmitted with the next request to the server, failing which the request will be ignored or redirected to the landing page. These cookies may expire after a set period of time and have to be regenerated by the server. Ordinary scraping scripts using libraries such as urllib2 may fail when you attempt to scrape these kinds of sites because the script doesn’t send the expected values. Similarly, pages may contain hidden import fields (basically form fields that are not visible to the user) that automatically submit long strings of alphanumeric characters to validate the request. Again, the script fails to submit the required string, and the request fails or is redirected. On other occasions, you may need to fill out a form before the server will send data, or you may wish to use the form to selectively choose which data to scrape. Selenium allows us to deal with these challenges because it controls an actual browser, such as Firefox, and when the script “clicks” a submit button, as an example, any cookies, hidden form fields, or JavaScript routines are handled by the browser just as they would be if a human user had clicked the button. -
Creating Custom DSL Editor for Eclipse Ian Graham Markit Risk Analytics
Speaking Your Language Creating a custom DSL editor for Eclipse Ian Graham 1 Speaking Your Language | © 2012 Ian Graham Background highlights 2D graphics, Fortran, Pascal, C Unix device drivers/handlers – trackball, display devices Smalltalk Simulation Sensor “data fusion” electronic warfare test-bed for army CASE tools for telecommunications Java Interactive visual tools for QC of seismic processing Seismic processing DSL development tools Defining parameter constraints and doc of each seismic process in XML Automating help generation (plain text and HTML) Smart editor that leverages DSL definition Now at Markit using custom language for financial risk analysis Speaking Your Language | © 2012 Ian Graham Overview Introduction: Speaking Your Language What is a DSL? What is Eclipse? Demo: Java Editor Eclipse architecture Implementing an editor Implementing a simple editor Demo Adding language awareness to your editor Demo Learning from Eclipse examples Resources Speaking Your Language | © 2012 Ian Graham Introduction: Speaking Your Language Goal illustrate power of Eclipse platform Context widening use of Domain Specific Languages Focus editing support for custom languages in Eclipse Speaking Your Language | © 2012 Ian Graham Recipe Editor 5 Text Editor Recipes | © 2006 IBM | Made available under the EPL v1.0 What is a DSL? Domain Specific Language - a simplified language for specific problem domain Specialized programming language E.g. Excel formula, SQL, seismic processing script Specification language -
Conflict Resolution in a Recursive Descent Compiler Generator
LL(1) Conflict Resolution in a Recursive Descent Compiler Generator Albrecht Wöß, Markus Löberbauer, Hanspeter Mössenböck Johannes Kepler University Linz, Institute of Practical Computer Science, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria {woess,loeberbauer,moessenboeck}@ssw.uni-linz.ac.at Abstract. Recursive descent parsing is restricted to languages whose grammars are LL(1), i.e., which can be parsed top-down with a single lookahead symbol. Unfortunately, many languages such as Java, C++, or C# are not LL(1). There- fore recursive descent parsing cannot be used or the parser has to make its deci- sions based on semantic information or a multi-symbol lookahead. In this paper we suggest a systematic technique for resolving LL(1) conflicts in recursive descent parsing and show how to integrate it into a compiler gen- erator (Coco/R). The idea is to evaluate user-defined boolean expressions, in order to allow the parser to make its parsing decisions where a one symbol loo- kahead does not suffice. Using our extended compiler generator we implemented a compiler front end for C# that can be used as a framework for implementing a variety of tools. 1 Introduction Recursive descent parsing [16] is a popular top-down parsing technique that is sim- ple, efficient, and convenient for integrating semantic processing. However, it re- quires the grammar of the parsed language to be LL(1), which means that the parser must always be able to select between alternatives with a single symbol lookahead. Unfortunately, many languages such as Java, C++ or C# are not LL(1) so that one either has to resort to bottom-up LALR(1) parsing [5, 1], which is more powerful but less convenient for semantic processing, or the parser has to resolve the LL(1) con- flicts using semantic information or a multi-symbol lookahead. -
A4Q Selenium Tester Foundation Syllabus
A4Q Selenium Tester Foundation Syllabus Released Version 2018 Alliance for Qualification Version 2018 © A4Q Copyright 2018 © A4Q Copyright 2018 - Copyright notice All contents of this work, in particular texts and graphics, are protected by copyright. The use and exploitation of the work is exclusively the responsibility of the A4Q. In particular, the copying or duplication of the work but also of parts of this work is prohibited. The A4Q reserves civil and penal consequences in case of infringement. Revision History Version Date Remarks Version 2018 5 August 2018 1. Release version Version 2018 3 December 2018 Minimal corrections Version 2018 © A4Q Copyright 2018 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 0 Introduction 4 0.1 Purpose of this Syllabus 4 0.2 Examinable Learning Objectives and Cognitive Levels of Knowledge 4 0.3 The Selenium Tester Foundation Exam 4 0.4 Accreditation 5 0.5 Level of Detail 5 0.6 How this Syllabus is Organized 5 0.7 Business Outcomes 6 0.8 Acronyms 6 Chapter 1 - Test Automation Basics 7 1.1 Test Automation Overview 7 1.2 Manual vs. Automated Tests 9 1.3 Success Factors 12 1.4 Risks and Benefits of Selenium WebDriver 13 1.5 Selenium WebDriver in Test Automation Architecture 14 1.6 Purpose for Metrics Collection in Automation 16 1.7 The Selenium Toolset 18 Chapter 2 - Internet Technologies for Test Automation of Web Applications 20 2.1 Understanding HTML and XML 20 2.1.1 Understanding HTML 20 2.1.2 Understanding XML 28 2.2 XPath and Searching HTML Documents 30 2.3 CSS Locators 33 Chapter 3 - Using Selenium WebDriver