DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Look on Regret Regulation Process for Risky Decisions Nawel

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A New Look on Regret Regulation Process for Risky Decisions Nawel “I should not have been so cautious!” A new look on regret regulation process for risky decisions Nawel AYADI Maîtres de conférences IAE de Toulouse, Université Toulouse I Capitole CRM, EAC-CNRS 5032 [email protected] Laurent BERTRANDIAS Maîtres de conférences IAE de Toulouse, Université Toulouse I Capitole CRM, EAC-CNRS 5032 [email protected] « Je n’aurais pas dû être aussi prudent ! » Un nouveau regard sur le processus de régulation du regret pour les décisions risquées Résumé Le consommateur essaie de réguler son émotion de regret en prenant des décisions capables de minimiser le regret ressenti. Les conséquences des décisions risquées sont inconnues amenant le consommateur à anticiper le regret éprouvé pour les différentes situations possibles. L’article suggère que le regret anticipé est ambivalent et distingue le classique regret anticipé d’une prise de risque excessive (ARERT) du regret anticipé d’une recherche excessive de sécurité (ARESS). Les résultats de notre expérience montrent que ces deux regrets exercent des effets contraires sur la prise de risque mais que ces effets sont modérés par l’intelligence émotionnelle du consommateur. Mots-clés : régulation du regret, regret anticipé, intelligence émotionnelle, prise de risque “I should not have been so cautious!” A new look on regret regulation process for risky decisions Abstract Consumers try to regulate regret by taking decisions which minimize regret experience. Risky decisions consequences are unknown leading consumers to anticipate regret for all possible situations. The article suggests that anticipated regret is ambivalent and distinguishes between “traditional” anticipated regret of an excessive risk-taking (ARERT) and anticipated regret of an excessive safety-seeking (ARESS). Our experimental results show that both regrets exert opposite effects upon risk-taking but these effects are moderated by consumer emotional intelligence. Key-words: regret regulation, anticipated regret, emotional intelligence, risk-taking “I should not have been so cautious!” A new look on regret regulation process for risky decisions1 Introduction Choosing between several options is much more difficult and frightening when gains and losses are only known after the choice. Nevertheless, for consumers and savers, these choices under uncertainty are rather frequent. For instance, consumers have very often to choose among numbers of insurance contracts covering different ranges of damages with different prices. Moreover, when savers decide to invest their money in more or less risky financial investments, they often arbitrate between two basic options: the secure one associated to a low outcome and the uncertain one which has a potential high return (Kwon and Lee, 2009). This kind of choice induces complex cognitive trade-offs between risk-taking and safety-seeking individual aspirations (Zeelenberg et al., 1996). They also may be influenced by emotional aspects. In particular, consumers’ choices under uncertainty may lead them to experience regret (Simonson, 1992; Zeelenberg et al., 1996). For instance, let us imagine a consumer who has to contract a housing insurance policy to guarantee electric damages. This policy offers two alternative options. The more expensive one includes a refund of damaged devices on the basis of their purchasing price. In the cheaper second option, compensations are indexed on the real value of devices taking depreciation into account. Whatever the chosen option, consumer may experience regret because he will know exactly in the future the amount of his losses. If the cheaper policy is selected, regret would appear if he has to suffer an electric incident and if most of his devices are damaged. If he chooses the expensive option without undergoing an electric incident, he might also regret his prudence. 1 L’article est écrit en anglais mais les lecteurs peuvent formuler leurs remarques en français. 1 Behavioral decision-making research suggests that anticipated emotions such as anticipated regret are important determinants of subsequent behaviors (Hetts et al., 2000; McConnell et al., 2000; Mellers, Schwartz and Ritov, 1999) and decision-making (Connolly and Butler, 2006, Simonson, 1992). Arbitration between risk and security is propitious to regret because individuals can exactly assess, when the decision outcomes are known, how much they have lost. The rejected alternative is the standard from which the amount of loss is appraised. In the previous example, consumers take risk when they favor the cheaper policy. Then, when they face up to an electric incident, they experience regret because they can precisely assess the amount of loss due to the incomplete refund of their damaged devices. On the contrary, consumers favor safety when they select the expensive insurance policy. They may experience regret if, after many years, they realize they have spent a lot without suffering any damage. According to Zeelenberg and Pieters (2007a), individuals implement strategies to regulate their regret process. Generally, their goal is to minimize or more basically to avoid their post-decisional regret feeling. They set up a comparison mechanism based on a counterfactual thinking by asking themselves the following question: what would be my outcomes if I choose the other alternative? Depending on the answer, individuals may take a high level of risk or, in the opposite, may privilege cautiousness and prudence in order to minimize their regret. We argue that the regulation process is more complex in risky decisions because such decisions convey two forms of regret: regret of excessive risk-taking (ARERT) and regret of excessive safety-seeking (ARESS) (see figure 1) Safer decisions Risky decisions Safety-seeking risk-taking tendency tendency ARESS ARERT Figure 1. Risk-taking continuum and anticipated regrets 2 Some researches have identified the role of anticipated regret upon risk-avoidance (Josephs et al., 1992; Simonson, 1992; Zeelenberg et al., 1996). This article intends to demonstrate that the effect of anticipated regret on risk decisions is not unilateral. It develops the idea that both types of anticipated regrets (ARESS and ARERT) influence, directly and in opposite way, risk-taking decision. Because ARESS is a rather new concept, it is also interesting to identify factors reinforcing its effect on risk-taking. Regret is conceptualized as a cognitively determined emotion (Bell, 1982). However, emotions can vary in terms of complexity. We propose that, for risk-averse consumers, the regret of excessive safety seeking (ARESS) is a more subtle emotion than regret of excessive risk-taking (ARERT). Consequently, ARESS should be emotional information that is difficult to decrypt and to exploit in the decisional process. For that reason, we assume that consumer emotional intelligence (CEI) (Kidwell, Hardesty and Childers, 2008a) could be a factor which helps consumers to associate ARESS and risky decision. Emotional Intelligence concept derives from Mayer and Salovey's (1997) and Salovey and Mayer’s (1990) conceptualization and definition as a human ability varying across individuals. More precisely, emotional intelligence does not reflect a single trait or ability but rather consists in a composite of distinct emotional reasoning abilities: perceiving, facilitating, understanding, and regulating emotions. The roles of emotional intelligence have been widely studied in the fields of human resources and strategic management but very insufficiently investigated in marketing. Kidwell, Hardesty and Childers (2008a, 2008b) argue that consumption acts involve specific situations (e.g. making choices within a set of options, interacting with salespersons) which require relevant emotional domain-specific concepts. In sum, it is necessary to adapt the general emotional intelligence concept and measurement to consumption context. In particular, we aim to show that the positive effect of ARESS upon risk-taking is strengthened by consumer emotional intelligence (CEI). This research conveys implications for consumers’ regret regulation theory and for companies proposing products 3 and services involving different levels and types of risks, such as insurance companies or banks. The first section of the research describes the theoretical and conceptual framework. The method of the empirical study is presented in the second section. Results are then detailed and followed by a general discussion and implications. 1. Theoretical and conceptual framework 1.1. Regret regulation process It is commonly accepted that a decision alternative is evaluated with regard to its expected outcomes, including emotional ones. According to Zeelenberg (1999, p. 94), regret, which is one of the most studied emotions, is "an emotion cognitively determined and tested when the individual carries out or imagines that its current situation could have been better if he/she had acted differently". Based on counterfactual thinking, regret is a cognitive and aversive emotion resulting from a comparison made by consumer facing a decision-making issue. However, this comparison can be very complicated. Indeed, assessing whether a choice would be regretful or not is not always that obvious. At the beginning, regret theory, introduced by Bell (1982) and Loomes and Sugden (1982), was based on action comparison (Zeelenberg et al., 1996). Recent research developed a new conception based on inaction (Arkes, Kung and Hutzel, 2002; Tsiros, 2009; Tykocinski and Pittman, 1998; Zeelenberg et
Load more

Recommended publications
  • About Emotions There Are 8 Primary Emotions. You Are Born with These
    About Emotions There are 8 primary emotions. You are born with these emotions wired into your brain. That wiring causes your body to react in certain ways and for you to have certain urges when the emotion arises. Here is a list of primary emotions: Eight Primary Emotions Anger: fury, outrage, wrath, irritability, hostility, resentment and violence. Sadness: grief, sorrow, gloom, melancholy, despair, loneliness, and depression. Fear: anxiety, apprehension, nervousness, dread, fright, and panic. Joy: enjoyment, happiness, relief, bliss, delight, pride, thrill, and ecstasy. Interest: acceptance, friendliness, trust, kindness, affection, love, and devotion. Surprise: shock, astonishment, amazement, astound, and wonder. Disgust: contempt, disdain, scorn, aversion, distaste, and revulsion. Shame: guilt, embarrassment, chagrin, remorse, regret, and contrition. All other emotions are made up by combining these basic 8 emotions. Sometimes we have secondary emotions, an emotional reaction to an emotion. We learn these. Some examples of these are: o Feeling shame when you get angry. o Feeling angry when you have a shame response (e.g., hurt feelings). o Feeling fear when you get angry (maybe you’ve been punished for anger). There are many more. These are NOT wired into our bodies and brains, but are learned from our families, our culture, and others. When you have a secondary emotion, the key is to figure out what the primary emotion, the feeling at the root of your reaction is, so that you can take an action that is most helpful. .
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Aspects of Emotions in Fish
    Behavioural Processes 100 (2013) 153–159 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Behavioural Processes jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/behavproc Functional aspects of emotions in fish ∗ Silje Kittilsen Norwegian School of Veterinary Science, Norway a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: There is an ongoing scientific discussion on whether fish have emotions, and if so how they experience Received 19 March 2013 them? The discussion has incorporated important areas such as brain anatomy and function, physiological Received in revised form and behavioural responses, and the cognitive abilities that fish possess. Little attention has however, been 10 September 2013 directed towards what functional aspects emotions ought to have in fish. If fish have emotions – why? Accepted 11 September 2013 The elucidation of this question and an assessment of the scientific evidences of emotions in fish in an evolutionary and functional framework would represent a valuable contribution in the discussion on Keywords: whether fish are emotional creatures. Here parts of the vast amount of literature from both biology and Emotions Behaviour psychology relating to the scientific field of emotions, animal emotion, and the functional aspects that Cognition emotions fulfil in the lives of humans and animals are reviewed. Subsequently, by viewing fish behaviour, Psychology physiology and cognitive abilities in the light of this functional framework it is possible to infer what Fish functions emotions may serve in fish. This approach may contribute to the vital running discussion on Evolution the subject of emotions in fish. In fact, if it can be substantiated that emotions are likely to serve a function in fish similar to that of other higher vertebrate species, the notion that fish do have emotions will be strengthened.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empathy Connection
    The Empathy Connection Creating Caring Communities through the Human-Animal Relationship The Doris Day Animal Foundation (DDAF) is a national nonprofit organization working to create caring communities. Thanks to a generous grant from the Claire Giannini Fund, we are pleased to present “The Empathy Connection,” a publication designed to help parents, teachers, and other adults instill the important skill of empathy in our youth. As a mother of two school-age children, president of the parent teacher’s association of a middle school, and as the Executive Director of the Doris Day Animal Foundation, I know how important empathy is in children’s development. Empathy is an important skill, related to success in many areas of development—social, academic, and personal. Learning how to respond empathetically is also the best antidote to violence, bullying, and other unwanted, aggressive behavior in children. The basic tenet of DDAF’s “creating caring communities” mission is that the protection of, and respect for, animals is closely linked to human welfare. The development of empathy is a case in point: one of the best—and probably one of the most enjoyable—ways to teach children empathy is through the human-animal relationship. The Doris Day Animal Foundation offers training workshops and materials designed to help professional and lay communities address the problem of violence and promote positive development in children, families, and communities. We do this by demonstrating how paying attention to the animal-human welfare link builds safer, more creative communities for all living creatures. We hope you will let us know how you used “The Empathy Connection,” or other DDAF materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Playbook—The Fear of Loss and Regret Approaching the Challenges and Potential Opportunities of Market Volatility
    T. ROWE PRICE INSIGHTS ON GLOBAL EQUITY Crisis Playbook—The Fear of Loss and Regret Approaching the challenges and potential opportunities of market volatility. March 2020 isk happens. Global equity markets entered 2020 in a state Rof Goldilocks—low interest rates and bottoming short‑cycle economic indicators. Markets were heavily David Eiswert focused on the Trump administration’s election “put” and China’s focus on Portfolio Manager, economic stability heading into 2021. T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund This benign environment drove markets and multiples higher. Then the butterfly flapped its wings and time, it seems that COVID‑19 is not a we found ourselves with COVID‑19, the mortal threat to most people. Obviously, novel coronavirus. this is conjecture given I am no expert in virology or public health. So we are COVID‑19 introduced a risk poorly continuing to track the development handled by monetary policy, the world’s of this crisis, learning and evolving our preferred tool for economic stability. A thinking as the situation unfolds. supply shock has spread outward from China along with the virus. Regardless, a virus that is novel and spreads far and wide means panic The virus appears to be very contagious as well as volatility in asset prices as but relatively mild compared with others, unexpected risks present themselves. Our first task such as Ebola and MERS, but pandemic We are tasked with managing a global means suffering and death and must equity fund given these circumstances, is to act early. be urgently addressed. The immediate and in moments such as this, I am control of COVID‑19 is particularly incredibly grateful for our global complex in that many of its victims are research resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 17(1), 3–18 Copyright © 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. HJCP A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0 Regret Regulation Theory Marcel Zeelenberg and Rik Pieters Tilburg University, The Netherlands We propose a theory of regret regulation that distinguishes regret from related emotions, specifies the conditions under which regret is felt, the aspects of the decision that are regret- ted, and the behavioral implications. The theory incorporates hitherto scattered findings and ideas from psychology, economics, marketing, and related disciplines. By identifying strate- gies that consumers may employ to regulate anticipated and experienced regret, the theory identifies gaps in our current knowledge and thereby outlines opportunities for future research. The average consumer makes a couple of thousands of concerning regret. Regret research originated in basic decisions daily. These include not only the decision of research in economics (Bell, 1982; Loomes & Sugden, 1982), which products and brands to buy and in which quantity, and psychology (Gilovich & Medvec, 1995; Kahneman & but also what to eat for breakfast, what kind of tea to Tversky, 1982; Landman, 1993). Nowadays one can find drink, whether to read the morning newspaper, which spe- examples of regret research in many different domains, such cific articles and ads (and whether to act on them), when to as marketing (Inman & McAlister, 1994; Simonson, 1992), stop reading, which shows to watch on which TV-channels law (Guthrie, 1999; Prentice & Koehler, 2003), organiza- (and whether to zap or zip), or maybe watch a DVD, and tional behavior (Goerke, Moller, & Schulz-Hardt, 2004; for how long, how to commute to work or school, and so Maitlis & Ozcelik, 2004), medicine (Brehaut et al., 2003; forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Playbook—The Fear of Loss and Regret Approaching the Challenges and Potential Opportunities of Market Volatility
    T. ROWE PRICE INSIGHTS ON GLOBAL EQUITY Crisis Playbook—The Fear of Loss and Regret Approaching the challenges and potential opportunities of market volatility. March 2020 isk happens. Global equity markets entered 2020 in a state Rof Goldilocks—low interest rates and bottoming short‑cycle economic indicators. Markets were heavily David Eiswert focused on the Trump administration’s election “put” and China’s focus on Portfolio Manager, Global Focused Growth economic stability heading into 2021. Equity Strategy This benign environment drove markets and multiples higher. Then the butterfly flapped its wings and a virus with these characteristics could we found ourselves with COVID‑19, the spread far and wide. At the same time, novel coronavirus. it seems that COVID‑19 is not a mortal threat to most people. Obviously, this COVID‑19 introduced a risk poorly is conjecture given I am no expert in handled by monetary policy, the world’s virology or public health. So we are preferred tool for economic stability. A continuing to track the development supply shock has spread outward from of this crisis, learning and evolving our China along with the virus. thinking as the situation unfolds. The virus appears to be very contagious Regardless, a virus that is novel and but relatively mild compared with others, spreads far and wide means panic Our first task such as Ebola and MERS, but pandemic as well as volatility in asset prices as means suffering and death and must unexpected risks present themselves. is to act early. be urgently addressed. The immediate We are tasked with managing a control of COVID‑19 is particularly global equity portfolio given these complex in that many of its victims are circumstances, and in moments such either not sick or not so seriously sick as this, I am incredibly grateful for our that they can be identified and isolated global research resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grief of Late Pregnancy Loss a Four Year Follow-Up
    The grief of late pregnancy loss A four year follow-up Joke Hunfeld The grief of late pregnancy loss A four year follow-up Rouwreacties bij laat zwangerschapsverlies. Een vervolgstudie over vier jaar. Proefschrift Tel' verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Pro£dr P.W.C. Akkermans M.A. en volgens besluit van het college voor promoties. De open bare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op woensdag 13 september 1995 om 15.45 uur door Johanna Aurelia Maria Hunfeld geboren te Utrecht. Promotiecommissie: Promotoren: Pro£ jhr dr J.w, Wladimiroff Pro£ dr E Verhage Overige leden: Pro£ dr H.P. van Geijn Pro£ dr D. Tibboel Pro£ dr Ee. Verhulst Het onderzoek dat in dit proefschrift is beschreven kon worden uitgevoerd dankzij subsidies van Ontwikkelings Geneeskunde, het Universiteitsfonds van de Erasmus Universiteit en het Nationaal Fonds voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondhcid. CIP-gegevens KDninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag Hunfeld, J.A.M. The grief onate pregnancy loss / Johanna Aurelia Maria Hunfeld - Delft Eburon P & L Proefschrift Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam - met samenvatting in het Nederlands ISBN 90-5651-011-8 Nugi Trefw;: perinatal grief Distributie: Eburon P&L, Postbus 2867, 2601 CW Delft Drukwerk: Ponsen & Looijen BY, Wageningen Lay-out verzorging: A. Praamstra All rights reserved Omslagtekening © P. Picasso, 1995 do Becldrecht Amsterdam © Joke Hunfeld, 1995 Rouwreacties bij laat zwangerschapsverlics Eell vcrvolgstudie over vier jaar Contents 1 Theoretical and empirical background
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Finance: Loss and Regret Aversion
    Commentary September 2014 Behavioral Finance: Loss and Regret Aversion Prospect Theory proposes that investors’ decision-making processes are contingent on the perceived values and costs of gains and losses, rather than the likelihood of each outcome. Loss aversion suggests that investors tend to be disproportionately risk averse in relation to their expected outcomes in order to avoid the pain associated with financial loss. Regret aversion posits that investor indecision and failure to take action typically stems from wanting to avoid responsibility for a poor result. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky (K&T) conceived However, securities prices often rise or fall for good Prospect Theory in 1979, three years after the reason, after new information comes to light (see publication of their seminal Judgment Under Uncertainty: Behavioral Finance: The Three A’s – Availability, Heuristics and Biases. Anchoring and Adjustment for a more thorough explanation). Prospect Theory was a critique of and alternative offered to the “expected utility theory,” which stated that people When investors fail to appropriately adjust the estimated can assess the value of decisions by combining outcome value of their investments as a result of new information, probabilities with the values of those outcomes. On the causing them to sell winners too early or losers too late, contrary, K&T sought to explain, decision-making they change the risk-reward profile of their portfolios for processes are contingent on the values and costs the worse. investors associate with gains and losses rather than the likelihood of each outcome. According to Prospect Such loss aversion, combined with myopia (or short-term Theory, investors tend to qualify these gains and losses perspective), accounts for the “equity premium puzzle,” through the lens of various heuristics (rules of thumb), according to theorists Shlomo Bernatzi and Richard further limiting their ability to make reasonable decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Experience of Men After Miscarriage Stephanie Dianne Rose Purdue University
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations January 2015 The Experience of Men After Miscarriage Stephanie Dianne Rose Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Recommended Citation Rose, Stephanie Dianne, "The Experience of Men After Miscarriage" (2015). Open Access Dissertations. 1426. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1426 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. THE EXPERIENCE OF MEN AFTER MISCARRIAGE A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Stephanie Dianne Rose In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii To my curious, sweet, spunky, intelligent, and fun-loving daughter Amira, and to my unborn baby (lost to miscarriage February 2010), whom I never had the privilege of meeting. I am extremely happy and fulfilled being your mother. Thank you for your motivation and inspiration. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to everyone who contributed to my study. Specifically, I am indebted to my sisters Sara Okello and Stacia Firebaugh for their helpful revisions, and to my parents Scott and Susan Firebaugh for their emotional and financial support along the way. I am thankful to those who provided childcare during this project, including my family and friends. My wonderful family and friends have blessed me with much support and encouragement throughout this project. I am also very grateful to my advisor Dr. Heather Servaty-Seib for her tireless support and investment in this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Guilt and Shame Among Violent Criminals Mehvish Riaz* Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
    riminolog C y: d O n p Riaz, Social Crimonol 2018, 6:2 a e y n g A DOI: 10.35248/2375-4435.18.6.191 o c l c o i e c s o s Sociology and Criminology-Open Access S ISSN: 2375-4435 Research Article Article OpenOpen Access Access Exploring Guilt and Shame among Violent Criminals Mehvish Riaz* Institute of Applied Psychology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan Abstract The purpose of this study was to explore Shame and Guilt among Violent Criminals. The main objective was to determine whether criminals feel shame? Another objective was to assess whether old criminals feel less shame? First, the profile of violent criminals was made who were currently incarcerated. The profile included age, crime, marital status, education, occupation, victim, crime occurrence (1st time, 2nd time) and circumstances of the crime. Semi-structured interview design was used to assess moral emotions. Self made questionnaire was developed for this purpose. A sample of 10 criminals was taken from District Jail Kotlakhpat Lahore. Interview was conducted with criminals individually. Content analysis of the data was carried out. Frequencies and percentages of the data were obtained. For further analysis data from 20 policemen and 10 lawyers was also taken, to determine if they noticed feelings of shame and guilt among criminals. Another self made questionnaire was developed. Analysis was carried out through Spss (16.5). Frequencies and percentages of the data were obtained. The finding of the results showed that criminals had feelings of guilt as well as shame, whether they were first time offenders or re-offenders.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing the Emotional and Cognitive Components of Regret Joshua BUCHANAN Central Washington University
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Lee Kong Chian School of Business Business 5-2016 The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the emotional and cognitive components of regret Joshua BUCHANAN Central Washington University Amy SUMMERVILLE Miami University Jennifer LEHMANN Case Western Reserve University Jochen REB Singapore Management University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research Part of the Cognitive Psychology Commons, and the Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons Citation BUCHANAN, Joshua; SUMMERVILLE, Amy; LEHMANN, Jennifer; and Jochen REB. The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the emotional and cognitive components of regret. (2016). Judgment and Decision Making. 11, (3), 275-286. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business. Available at: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5121 This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Kong Chian School of Business at Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business by an authorized administrator of Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University. For more information, please email [email protected]. Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 3, May 2016, pp. 275–286 The Regret Elements Scale: Distinguishing the affective and cognitive components of regret Joshua Buchanan∗ Amy Summerville† Jennifer Lehmann† Jochen Reb ‡ Abstract Regret is one of the most common emotions, but researchers generally measure it in an ad-hoc, unvalidated fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximizing Versus Satisficing: Happiness Is a Matter of Choice
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2002, Vol. 83, No. 5, 1178–1197 0022-3514/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.5.1178 Maximizing Versus Satisficing: Happiness Is a Matter of Choice Barry Schwartz and Andrew Ward John Monterosso Swarthmore College University of Pennsylvania Sonja Lyubomirsky Katherine White and Darrin R. Lehman University of California, Riverside University of British Columbia Can people feel worse off as the options they face increase? The present studies suggest that some people—maximizers—can. Study 1 reported a Maximization Scale, which measures individual differ- ences in desire to maximize. Seven samples revealed negative correlations between maximization and happiness, optimism, self-esteem, and life satisfaction, and positive correlations between maximization and depression, perfectionism, and regret. Study 2 found maximizers less satisfied than nonmaximizers (satisficers) with consumer decisions, and more likely to engage in social comparison. Study 3 found maximizers more adversely affected by upward social comparison. Study 4 found maximizers more sensitive to regret and less satisfied in an ultimatum bargaining game. The interaction between maxi- mizing and choice is discussed in terms of regret, adaptation, and self-blame. Rational choice theory has tried to explain preference and principles of rational choice (e.g., J. Baron, 2000; Kahneman & choice by assuming that people are rational choosers (von Neu- Tversky, 1979, 1984; Tversky, 1969; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981; mann & Morgenstern, 1944). According to the rational choice for a discussion, see Schwartz, 1986, 1994). In particular, modern framework, human beings have well-ordered preferences—prefer- behavioral economics has acknowledged that the assumption of ences that are essentially impervious to variations in the way the complete information that characterizes rational choice theory is alternatives they face are described or the way in which they are implausible.
    [Show full text]