Samuel Beckett in Confinement the Politics of Closed Space

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Samuel Beckett in Confinement the Politics of Closed Space Samuel Beckett in Confinement The Politics of Closed Space James Little "The scope of this study will make it of interest to scholars across many disciplines. [...] What Beckett in Confinement contributes to the ongoing discussion of a Beckettian politics is an understanding of how the confined spaces of his oeuvre equip readers and audiences with a set of cognitive and conceptual tools for an ethical and political analysis of closed space. Little argues that the politics of Beckett’s spatial aesthetic is its resistance to the representation of enclosed spaces on the terms of the state, sidestepping hermeneutic closure to open up a multiplicity of closed spaces to socio- political critique. [...] It is a powerful argument for seeing Beckett’s oeuvre as a formal engagement with politics that places the ethical question foremost, with the spatial forms of his work shaped by a relation to the inalienable alterity of confinement that retains, rather than assimilates, its difference." The Modernist Review Enter code SBIC35 on bloomsbury.com for a 35% discount* Hardback | 256 pp | May 2020 | 9781350112322 | £85.00 £55.25 Confinement appears repeatedly in Samuel Beckett’s oeuvre – from the asylums central to Murphy and Watt to the images of confinement that shape plays such as Waiting for Godot and Endgame. Drawing on spatial theory and new archival research, Beckett in Confinement explores these recurring concepts of closed space to cast new light on the ethical and political dimensions of Beckett’s work. Covering the full range of Beckett’s writing career, including two plays he completed for prisoners, Catastrophe and the unpublished ‘Mongrel Mime’, the book shows how this engagement with the ethics of representing prisons and asylums stands at the heart of Beckett’s poetics. James Little is a postdoctoral researcher at Charles University, Prague and Visiting Professor at Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: Beckett’s Spatial Politics 1 Images of Confinement: Proust, Dream of Fair to Middling Women 2 The Ethics of Writing Confinement: ‘Dante and the Lobster’, ‘Fingal’, Murphy 3 ‘Vaguening’ Confinement: Watt 4 ‘Undoing’ Confinement: ‘The End’, ‘The Expelled’, Molloy, Malone Dies 5 Political Pentimenti: Waiting for Godot, Endgame 6 Learning to Say ‘Not I’: The Unnamable 7 Redoing Not I in ‘Non-A’ 8 ‘The Limits of Interpretation’: Imagination Dead Imagine, All Strange Away 9 The ‘Anethics’ of Staging Confinement: ‘Mongrel Mime’, Catastrophe Conclusion: ‘Mongrel’ Space *This offer is available to individuals only. Please note price and availability subject to change without notice. Discount code only valid for books showing as available on bloomsbury.com. Discount code valid until 30 September 2021. .
Recommended publications
  • 6 X 10 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86520-3 - Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image Anthony Uhlmann Index More information Index Abbott, H. Porter 106 Bre´hier, Emile 130, 134–6, 143, 145, 153 Ackerley, C. J. 39, 70 ...but the clouds ...2, 62 All That Fall 63 All Strange Away 2, 49, 64, 104 ‘Calmative, The’ 50, 61 Aldington, Richard 30 Carroll, Lewis 134 Altman, Robert 16, 17 Catastrophe 122, 129 Anzieu, Didier 112 Chaikin, Joseph 51 A Piece of Monologue 62 Chrysippus 130, 133, 141 Aristotle 71 Cioran, Emil 129 Arrabal, Fernando 129 Cicero 131 ‘As the Story Was Told’ 49 Cleanthes 130, 133 Cle´ment, Bruno 108–9, 110, 112 Bacon, Sir Francis 67, 92 cliche´ 12–14, 16–17 Badiou, Alain 112 ‘Cliff, The’ 50 Bakhtin, Mikhail 2, 57, 75 Cohn, Ruby 1, 48 Bataille, Georges 108 Come and Go 45, 62, 138, 139, 140 Beckett, Samuel Company 50 on Jack Yeats 24, 30–1 Conrad, Joseph 124 letter to Georges Duthuit 1949 26, 37–8, 117 Czerny, Carl 1 and knowledge of Bergson 29–31, 117–18 and letter to Axel Kaun 54, 66 d’Aubare`de, Gabriel 72, 74 on Joyce 56 Dante Alighieri 78, 104 and the nature of the image in his works ‘Dante ...Bruno. Vico.. Joyce’ 26, 74 62–4 Dearlove, J. E. 36 reading of Geulincx’ Ethics 70, 81, 90–105 Defoe, Daniel 68 and the image of the rocking chair 78–85 de Lattre, Alain 69 and images adapted from Geulincx 90–105 Deleuze, Gilles 2, 112, 147–8 and his notes to his reading of Geulincx 90–1, and minor tradition 5 92, 131 and Cinema books 6–14, 18–21 and the image of the voice 94–5 and the image in Beckett 31–5 Beethoven, Ludwig van
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical Response to Samuel Beckett
    THE CRITICAL RESPONSE TO SAMUEL BECKETT Edited by CATHLEEN CULOTTA ANDONIAN Critical Responses in Arts and Letters, Number 30 Cameron Northouse, Series Adviser GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Contents Series Foreword by Cameron Northouse xvii Acknowledgments xix Introduction 1 1. Early Prose and Poetry Symbolism To-day Bonamy Dobree 13 Dubliners Arthur Calder-Marshall 14 Samuel Beckett and His Whoroscope Clas Zilliacus 15 Savage Humor Vivian Mercier 17 2. The Novel: Murphy, Watt, and The Trilogy Fiction Kate O'Brien 21 A Master Stylist B. S.Johnson 22 xii Contents Nought into Zero A. J. Leventhal 23 Under the Jar John Coleman 26 Samuel Beckett's World of Fiction Charles I. Glicksberg 27 Samuel Beckett and the Death of the God-Narrator Brian Wicker 39 Not Going Places Enoch Brater 51 L'Innommable and the Hermeneutic Paradigm Brian T. Fitch 54 Naming the M/inotaur: Beckett's Trilogy and the Failure of Narrative Roch C. Smith 62 Beckett and the Comedy of Decomposition Morton Gurewitch 70 Ashes to Ashes, Dust to Dust Robert Sandarg 79 3. Early Theatrical Works Theatre (Review of Waiting for Godot) Anthony Hartley 91 Theatre (Review of Waiting for Godot) Harold Clurman 93 The Uneventful Event Vivian Mercier 95 En attendant Godot: Tragedy or Comedy? Ramona Cormier and Janis L. Pallister 96 Contents xiii Samuel Beckett and the Postmodern: Language Games, Play, and Waiting for Godot Jeffrey Nealon 106 How to Read Endgame Vivian Mercier 114 Theatre (Review of Endgame) Harold Clurman 118 In the Ruins of the Past: Reading Beckett Intertextually Per Nykrog 120 Rebuke to Nihilism Tom F.
    [Show full text]
  • Posthuman Beckett English 9169B Winter 2019 the Course Analyzes the Short Prose That Samuel Beckett Produced Prior to and After
    Posthuman Beckett English 9169B Winter 2019 The course analyzes the short prose that Samuel Beckett produced prior to and after his monumental The Unnamable (1953), a text that initiated Beckett’s deconstruction of the human subject: The Unnamable is narrated by a subject without a fully-realized body, who inhabits no identifiable space or time, who is, perhaps, dead. In his short prose Beckett continues his exploration of the idea of the posthuman subject: the subject who is beyond the category of the human (the human understood as embodied, as historically and spatially located, as possessing some degree of subjective continuity). What we find in the short prose (our analysis begins with three stories Beckett produced in 1945-6: “The Expelled,” “The Calmative,” “The End”) is Beckett’s sustained fascination with the idea of the possibility of being beyond the human: we will encounter characters who can claim to be dead (“The Calmative,” Texts for Nothing [1950-52]); who inhabit uncanny, perhaps even post-apocalyptic spaces (“All Strange Away” [1963-64], “Imagination Dead Imagine” [1965], Lessness [1969], Fizzles [1973-75]); who are unaccountably trapped in what appears to be some kind of afterlife (“The Lost Ones” [1966; 1970]); who, in fact, may even defy even the philosophical category of the posthuman (Ill Seen Ill Said [1981], Worstward Ho [1983]). And yet despite the radical dismantling of the idea or the human, as such, the being that emerges in these texts is still, perhaps even insistently, spatially, geographically, even ecologically, located. This course which finds its philosophical inspiration in the work of Martin Heidegger, especially his critical analysis of the relation between being and world, and attempts to come to some understanding of what it means for the posthuman to be in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Samuel Beckett's Short Prose Fiction
    Samuel Beckett, 1969, Ink on board , as represented by cartoonist Edmund Valtman. From Storms of Sound to Missing Words: The Story of Samuel Beckett’s Short prose Fiction María José Carrera de la Red UNIVERSIDAD DE VALLADOLID A chronological ove r v i ew of Samuel Becke t t ’s short prose fiction may seem an unlikely choice as a celebration of the life and work of the author of seminal texts in the history of 20t h- c e n t u r y literature like Waiting for Godot or The Unnamable. But it takes the reading of these lesser- k n ow n t exts to fully understand what the whole Beckettian project is about. If Beckett referred to his prose fiction as “the important writing” —signifi c a n t l y, prose was the only genre, with poetry, that he practised from the beginning to the very end of his career— his short prose texts in particular can be said to delineate the story of his creative evolution providing, by virtue of their concentrated nature, magnificent introductions to his varying artistic intentions and writing methods. As might be expected with an author like Beckett, some of these texts are so innova t ive or experimental that even terminology fails. Certainly it is hard to call them fi c t i o n, or s t o r i e s, but eve n the word p ro s e is ill-fitting to describe some of Becke t t ’s more concentrated attempts, one of which was about to be included in a poetry collection when Beckett claimed that it was prose not ve r s e .
    [Show full text]
  • Mingled Flesh Ulrika Maude
    MINGLED FLESH ULRIKA MAUDE All Strange Away, Imagination Dead Imagine, Ping, and The Lost Ones figure among the shorter prose fictions Samuel Beckett wrote in the 1960s. Critics have tended to approach this group of texts, which are linked not only in imagery but also through their textual genetics, as allegories of the human condition or as parables of the authorial process. Closer scrutiny of these works reveals that the prose fragments engage in a probing examination of the contradictory nature of perception and the embodied state of subjectivity. Through a systematic set of negations, marked by the abandonment of the first-person narrator, the privileging of gesture and posture over language and hearing and, most prominently, the prioritising of the sense of touch over that of vision, these works question and undermine the primacy of the conceptual order, foregrounding exteriority and surface over interiority and depth. The narrating voice itself, through its application of conflicting and ultimately self-negating registers, becomes the locus merely of further doubt and uncertainty. The same can even be said of the persistently failing mathematics of the narrator. In short, the systematic interrogations and negations in the texts set into motion a vacillating dynamic between subjectivity and its dissolution. During the 1960s, Samuel Beckett wrote a series of shorter prose fictions that have acquired an enigmatic place in their author’s canon. The series begins with All Strange Away, which dates from 1963-1964, and Imagination Dead
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    ISSN 1751-8229 Volume Three, Number Three Beckett’s Ticklish Characters: reading Beckett through Žižek Federico Bellini, University of Siena. During the last decade, around the centennial celebration of Samuel Beckett’s birth, criticism of the author underwent a discreet yet radical subversion. After the era of existentialist reception and the subsequent postmodern phase, it looks like fresh interpretations are emerging that do without the dreariness of the former and the idiosyncrasies of the latter. At the forefront of this movement are Alain Badiou and Slavoij Žižek, who provide the tools to interpret Beckett’s literary characters as mi8rroring a certain understanding of the subject. This paper is part of a broader inquiry into the ontological status of the character in contemporary literature that will attempt to reclaim a consistency and centrality for the character that the last decades of critique have negated. In here, I will show how Beckett’s characters, far from representing a ‘fragmented self’, are the expression of a radical experience of the subject, which shares a deep affinity with Žižek’s theory, especially as presented in The Ticklish Subject. In consideration of space limitations, rather than providing an exhaustive overview of the Beckett corpus, I will focus on the last novel of his trilogy, The Unnamable, the most challenging yet most relevant of his works on this topic. I will demonstrate how this comprehension of the subject takes shape in the narrative world and how this narrative world curdles around it, giving birth to a character that grounds its singularity in its being originally split.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beckettian Mimesis of Absence
    Colby Quarterly Volume 39 Issue 2 June Article 3 June 2003 The Beckettian Mimesis of Absence Eric P. Levy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq Recommended Citation Colby Quarterly, Volume 39, no.2, June 2003, p. 137-150 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Colby Quarterly by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Colby. Levy: The Beckettian Mimesis of Absence The Beckettian Mimesis ofAbsence By ERIC P. LEVY ECKETTIAN MIMESIS insists on the primacy of perspective: "seen from a Bcertain angle" (The Lost Ones 13, 16; Malone Dies 245). But it is a per­ spective that paradoxically claims exclusive validity ("from this point of view but there is no other" ["Imagination Dead Imagine" 65]), while acknowledg­ ing its own limitation and fallibility: "for the visibility, unless it be the state of my eyesight, only permits me to see what is close beside me" (The Unnamable 297).1 Moreover, it is a perspective that, through recognizing its futility ("To be on the watch and never sight ..." (The Unnamable 368), repu­ diates its own function: "Perhaps it would be better to be blind ..." (The Unnamable 372-73); "I don't believe in the eye either, there's nothing to see, nothing to see with ..." (The Unnamable 375). In this context, the ultimate object seen from the Beckettian perspective is the reduction of sight to redun­ dant reflex with neither stimulus nor registration: "Then the eyes suddenly start afresh as famished as the unthinkable first day until for no clear reason they as suddenly close again or the head falls" (The Lost Ones 32).
    [Show full text]
  • Beckett on Film (2001) Artists for the Extraordinary Interviews That They Gave to Me, Some of Whom Are Quoted Here
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Balaam, Annette C Title: Samuel Beckett in Virtual Reality General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Samuel Beckett in Virtual Reality. ANNETTE CAROLINE BALAAM. A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of PhD in the Faculty of Arts, Graduate School of Arts and Humanities, October 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom and Negativity in the Works of Samuel Beckett and Theodor Adorno
    FREEDOM AND NEGATIVITY IN THE WORKS OF SAMUEL BECKETT AND THEODOR ADORNO Natalie Leeder Royal Holloway, University of London PhD Thesis TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY ........................................................................... 3 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... 5 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 9 CHAPTER ONE: FREEDOM AND ITS LIMITS ...................................................................... 44 CHAPTER TWO: THE ILLUSION OF FREEDOM AND THE FREEDOM OF ILLUSION ................ 71 CHAPTER THREE: THE SCARS OF EVIL .......................................................................... 105 CHAPTER FOUR: VIRTUAL FREEDOM ............................................................................ 144 CHAPTER FIVE: METAPHYSICS ..................................................................................... 190 EPILOGUE .................................................................................................................... 227 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Closed Spaces: Beckett and Confinement James Little Doctor of Philosophy in English Trinity College Dublin August 2017
    Closed Spaces: Beckett and Confinement James Little Doctor of Philosophy in English Trinity College Dublin August 2017 ii Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. Signature _________________________ iii Summary This thesis is the first sustained study of Samuel Beckett’s career-long engagement with confinement, examining both his use of institutions of coercive confinement as well as the closed spaces of his later prose and drama. Focussing on twenty-two case studies from Beckett’s critical, poetic, dramatic and prose writing, including the seven prose works in which institutions of confinement feature as key locales, it combines a historicist approach to institutional and performance space with the methodologies of genetic criticism (which studies an author’s manuscripts to investigate the geneses of his/her works) and spatial theory. Close readings of Beckett’s texts form the basis for a re-evaluation of his development as a writer and director. Chapter 1 analyses Beckett’s use of images of confinement, which allowed him to formulate key aesthetic problems in his critical monograph Proust, his posthumously published novel Dream of Fair to Middling Women and his short stories ‘Dante and the Lobster’ and ‘Fingal’. Chapters 2 and 3 examine the function of institutional space in Murphy and Watt, two novels in which an asylum setting is central to the narrative development, as well as to the development of Beckett’s own poetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Beckett Collection 1932-1996 MS.1991.001
    Samuel Beckett Collection 1932-1996 MS.1991.001 http://hdl.handle.net/2345/3248 Archives and Manuscripts Department John J. Burns Library Boston College 140 Commonwealth Avenue Chestnut Hill 02467 library.bc.edu/burns/contact URL: http://www.bc.edu/burns Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Biographical Note: Samuel Beckett .............................................................................................................. 6 Biographical Note: Calvin Israel ................................................................................................................... 6 Biographical Note: Robert Pinget .................................................................................................................. 7 Biographical Note: Barney Rosset ................................................................................................................ 7 Biographical Note: Judith Schmidt Douw ..................................................................................................... 8 Biographical Note: Alan Schneider ............................................................................................................... 8 Scope and Contents .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Piece of Monologue, 16, 36, 144, 172, 175-192, 196, 203, 209
    Index A Piece of Monologue, 16, 36, Beethoven, Ludwig van, 109, 144, 172, 175-192, 196, 153, 166 203, 209, 212, 216, 227, Begam, Richard, 84 230, 242, 246, 247 Benjamin, Walter, 74-75 Abbott, H. Porter, 122, 193- Benveniste, Emile, 32 194, 242 Ben-Zvi, Linda, 31, 33, 88, Acheson, James, 20 145, 161 Act Without Words, 42, 225 Berceuse, 234 Akalaitis, JoAnne, 240 Berkeley, Bishop George, 65 Albright, Daniel, 70-71, 74, Bernold, André, 109 83, 92, 134 Billington, Michael, 148 Aldington, Richard, 20 Bion, Wilfred Ruprecht, 29 All Strange Away, 103 Bishop, Thomas, 124 All That Fall, 30-31, 39, 44- Blake, William, 150 47, 56-57, 59, 66, 68, 73, Blin, Roger, 107, 120 77, 81, 109 Bragg, Melvyn, 154 Antonello da Messina, 133, Brater, Enoch, 11-13, 19, 22, 150 66, 83, 99, 117, 136, 139, Anzieu, Didier, 29 140-141, 155, 165, 183, Aplaugh, David, 73 188, 196, 205, 207-208, 224 Arikha, Avigador, 133, 135 Brecht, Bertolt, 132 Artaud, Antonin, 53-55, 58 Breton, André, 22 As the Story was Told, 123 Briezna, Susan, 221, 224 “Assumption”, 11, 18, 37-38, Browning, Robert, 21 Astier, Pierre, 195 Brustein, Robert, 240 Atik, Anne, 135 Buñuel, Luis, 22 Austin, J. L., 12 ...but the clouds..., 99, 154, Bacon, Francis, 148 171, 181, 188 Bair, Deirdre, 225 Callet, Jeanette Leigh, 11-12 Bakewell, Michael, 108 Caravaggio, Michaelangelo Baldwin, Hélène L, 143 Merisi da, 132-133 Banville, John, 22 Casanova, Pascale, 18, 23 Barthes, Roland, 56 Cascando, 13, 16, 27, 33, 79, Beach, Syliva, 17 107-129, 131, 151-152, 155, Beckett, John, 46, 108 164, 166, 168, 171-173, 274
    [Show full text]