DOCSLIB.ORG

Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons Twenty-fourth Report of Session 2013-14 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes Volume II: Oral evidence Written evidence is contained in Volume III, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/escom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 20 November 2013 HC 109-I Published on 28 November 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The European Scrutiny Committee The European Scrutiny Committee is appointed under Standing Order No. 143 to examine European Union documents. Current membership Mr William Cash MP (Conservative, Stone) (Chair) Andrew Bingham MP (Conservative, High Peak) Mr James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Connarty MP (Labour, Linlithgow and East Falkirk) Geraint Davies MP (Labour/Cooperative, Swansea West) Julie Elliott MP (Labour, Sunderland Central) Tim Farron MP (Liberal Democrat, Westmorland and Lonsdale) Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Chris Heaton-Harris MP (Conservative, Daventry) Kelvin Hopkins MP (Labour, Luton North) Chris Kelly MP (Conservative, Dudley South) Stephen Phillips MP (Conservative, Sleaford and North Hykeham) Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (Conservative, North East Somerset) Mrs Linda Riordan MP (Labour/Cooperative, Halifax) Henry Smith MP (Conservative, Crawley) Ian Swales MP (Liberal Democrat, Redcar) The following members were also members of the committee during the parliament: Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Jim Dobbin MP (Labour/Co-op, Heywood and Middleton) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Mr Joe Benton MP (Labour, Bootle) Powers The committee’s powers are set out in House of Commons Standing Order No 143. The scrutiny reserve resolution, passed by the House, provides that Ministers should not give agreement to EU proposals which have not been cleared by the European Scrutiny Committee, or on which, when they have been recommended by the Committee for debate, the House has not yet agreed a resolution. The scrutiny reserve resolution is printed with the House’s Standing Orders, which are available at www.parliament.uk. Committee staff The staff of the Committee are Sarah Davies (Clerk), David Griffiths (Clerk Adviser), Terry Byrne (Clerk Adviser), Leigh Gibson (Clerk Adviser), Peter Harborne (Clerk Adviser), Paul Hardy (Legal Adviser) (Counsel for European Legislation), Joanne Dee (Assistant Legal Adviser) (Assistant Counsel for European Legislation), Hannah Finer (Assistant to the Clerk), Julie Evans (Senior Committee Assistant), Jane Lauder (Committee Assistant), Beatrice Woods (Committee Assistant), John Graddon (Committee Assistant), and Paula Saunderson (Office Support Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the European Scrutiny Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is (020) 7219 3292/5465. The Committee’s email address is [email protected] Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons 1 Contents Report Page Summary 5 1 Introduction 7 The importance of European scrutiny and the reasons for this Inquiry 7 Discussions on scrutiny since 2005 8 Discussions since the 2010 General Election 9 How the House of Commons scrutiny process works 11 The House of Lords European Union Committee 13 Comparisons across the European Union 14 The National Parliament Office 15 2 The role of the European Scrutiny Committee: examining merits? 17 3 The role of the European Scrutiny Committee: stages of scrutiny 19 Introduction 19 Committee consideration of documents 20 Explanatory Memoranda 20 The sift 21 The scope of document deposit 23 The early stages of policy formulation 24 Non-papers 24 Scrutiny and legislative development 25 UKRep, Coreper and decision-making in the Council 28 Limité documents 30 The future of limité status 32 Council meetings 33 Transposition 34 Conclusion 36 Non-legislative acts: challenges for document definition following the Treaty of Lisbon 38 Legislative and non-legislative acts 38 Common Foreign and Security Policy and Common Defence and Security Policy proposals 39 Delegated and implementing acts 42 Proposed new definition of European document for Standing Order No. 14344 4 The importance of the scrutiny reserve 45 Draft European scrutiny reserve resolution 48 Draft Resolution on Title V opt-in and Schengen opt-out scrutiny 50 5 European Union business on the floor of the House 51 Debates on EU Documents on the floor of the House 51 Conclusion 52 A national veto and disapplication of EU law 54 2 Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons European Council meetings 57 Post-European Council statements 58 Oral Questions on EU matters 58 Commission Work Programme 60 Draft revised Standing Order and resolution relating to business on the floor of the House 61 6 Departmental Select Committees 63 Liaison between the European Scrutiny Committee and Departmental Select Committees 65 Upstream engagement 66 Conclusion 67 A greater sense of coherence and prioritisation — Commission Work Programme 67 European Reporters 69 7 European Committees 71 History 71 Conclusions 74 Membership 74 Nomenclature 74 Chairs and procedures 75 Motions in European Committee 75 Guidance and advice 76 Draft revised form of Standing Order No. 119 77 8 The visibility of scrutiny and the media 79 The role of the media 79 Reform of European Scrutiny Committee working practices 84 Documents and reports 84 Engagement with the European Parliament 84 The Committee’s informal meetings 85 Transparency 85 Pre-appointment hearings 86 9 Conclusion 88 Conclusions and recommendations 90 Annex 1: Glossary 105 Acquis 105 Codecision procedure/ordinary legislative procedure 105 Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) 105 Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) 105 Coreper 106 Council of the EU 106 Court of Justice of the EU 107 Delegating and Implementing Acts 107 European Commission 108 Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons 3 European Council 108 European External Action Service 108 European Parliament 109 Explanatory Memorandum 109 Green Paper 109 High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy 109 Presidency of the Council of the EU 110 Qualified Majority 110 Subsidiarity 111 White Paper 111 Annex 2 112 Formal minutes 129 Witnesses 130 List of written evidence 131 Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons 5 Summary The depth and pace of EU integration, now accelerating with demands for fiscal and political union and economic governance, has demonstrated the need for effective democratic parliamentary scrutiny and accountability of Government at Westminster— all of which affects the UK electorate. Since the UK joined the EEC, and the passing of the European Communities Act 1972, we and our predecessor Committees have been established under the Standing Orders of the House of Commons with the central task of prioritising EU proposals for scrutiny according to their political and legal importance. This is the first major inquiry into the European scrutiny system in the House of Commons for eight years. We have examined each aspect of our current powers, and also scrutinised the effectiveness of the other components of the system: Departmental Select Committees, European Committees and debates on the floor of the House. We set out full conclusions in Chapter 9. There is a need for essential reform to make the existing system more coherent and co- ordinated. Our sifting role is valued across the House. But there is more that we could do to look at the impact of new proposals on the electors of the United Kingdom, and our Standing Orders require an urgent update. The evidence we took showed how important it is to ensure that the policy expertise of Departmental Select Committees is applied to these complex questions; we propose that there should be a new requirement to appoint ‘Reporters’ to take the lead within Committees on EU issues, as well as a more co- ordinated approach to the Commission Work Programme. We were told that the existing European Committee system should be scrapped; we do not agree. The system must be enhanced. The problems with European Committees as currently constituted arise from the fact that new Members are appointed for each document. We argue forcefully for a return to the permanent membership system, new powers and a change of name to reflect the Committees’ core purpose: EU Document Debate Committees. Given the vital primacy of the United Kingdom Parliament, we also examined how EU business is taken on the floor of the House, and the procedures which apply to it. We set out a series of recommendations about the way debates are scheduled and conducted and put the case for a new session of ‘EU Questions’. In Chapter 8 of the Report we review our own working practices and the visibility of the House’s scrutiny of the EU in the media. It was disappointing that in the final stages of our inquiry we were thwarted in our efforts to hold two final key evidence sessions: one with the prospective Head of the UK Permanent Representation to the EU (UKRep), Ivan Rogers, and the second with the Chairman of the BBC Trust, Lord Patten of Barnes. In earlier evidence from the BBC, it was clear to us that serious questions need to be answered about how EU issues in general and scrutiny in particular are covered and explained, given the fundamental importance of this scrutiny to the workings of our parliamentary and legislative systems. We will take this forward over the coming months. As important as all these recommendations are it is now time also to take more radical 6 Reforming the European Scrutiny System in the House of Commons steps. Throughout this Report we allude to the fundamental role of national Parliaments – which has been emphasised in speeches this year by the Prime Minister, the Foreign Secretary and the Minister for Europe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 11 October 2011 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Masterman, R. and Mitchell, J. (2001) 'Devolution and the centre.', in The state of the nations 2001 : the second year of devolution in the United Kingdom. Thorverton: Imprint Academic, pp. 175-196. Further information on publisher's website: http://www.booksonix.com/imprint/bookshop/ Publisher's copyright statement: Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk 8 Devolution and the Centre' Roger Masterman and James Mitchell INTRODUCTION Much of the debate on devolution before the enactment of the various pieces of devolution legislation was parochial. It had been parochial in concentrat- ing on the opportunities, problems and implications of devolution within Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland; little attention had been paid to devo- lution's impact UK on the as a whole or on the `centre' - Whitehall and Westminster.
    [Show full text]
  • Read CDPRG Chairman Crispin Blunt's Letter to the Prime Minister
    The Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group, Limited Suite 15.17 Citibase, 15th Floor Millbank Tower 21-24 Millbank, Westminster London SW1P 4QP The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP The Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA 20 November 2020 Dear Prime Minister, As Chairman of the Conservative Drug Policy Reform Group, I am writing today with a comprehensive set of recommendations prepared by the CDPRG research team, to secure the future of the UK’s cannabidiol (CBD) industry. Though nascent, this industry is already valued at £300 million and it is predicted to grow to around £1 billion by 2025, equivalent to the entirety of the UK’s herbal supplement market in 2016. I am sure you will agree with me that this projected market growth, and the jobs, investment and R&D it attracts, needs safeguarding and stimulating rather than inhibiting. This fulfilment depends on the practicality of the legislations safeguarding this burgeoning industry, which is why I am writing to strongly recommend that the UK votes in favour of recommendations to be proposed on 02 December 2020 by the World Health Organisation at the 53rd United Nations Session on the Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND), of which the UK is a signatory. The WHO recommends adding the following footnote to the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, to read: "Preparations containing predominantly cannabidiol and not more than 0.2 percent of delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] are not under international control”. This harmonises with a ruling issued this week from the European Union that member states may not prohibit the marketing of CBD lawfully produced in other member states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Straiton Arrow
    October - December 2014 The Straiton 40p Arrow The long summer and recent mild weather has been very welcome even if Happy Birthday there are still a few midgies and wasps around. Cameron, 13 on 9th Dec Since the last Arrow we’ve had the Commonwealth Games and the Finn, 6 on 10th Nov Referendum. The amount of folk voting in the Straiton parish in the Angus & Kitty 4 on 13th Referendum was about 90% – an excellent turnout. Dec We also had the shock announcement that Dersalloch Wind Farm was Rory, 5 on 9th Jan approved without a Public Local Inquiry. Since then both South and East Isla 11 on 17th Jan Ayrshire councils have agreed to petition for a Judicial Review. David 6 on 20th Jan The high production of this issue is due to the kind assistance of Jim Kirk, a Cameron 11 on 28th Jan colour version is available to download or view on visitstraiton.com. James, 10 on 4th Feb Bea Holden Dates for your Diary November 25th Community Council Meeting, 19th Straiton Ladies Christmas 1st Bonfire Night, Showfield, McCandlish Hall, 7.30pm Night Out, Black Bull 7 for 7.30pm 7.30pm TBC Straiton Village Co-op AGM 21st Christmas Lunch in Hall, 2nd Communion Service, McCandlish Hall 1pm St Cuthbert’s, 12 noon 30th St Andrew’s Day 23rd School closes for holidays 9th Armistice Sunday Service, St December 24th Watchnight Service, Cuthbert’s and Memorial, 12 noon TBC School Carol Service and 11.30pm Kirkmichael 15th Christmas Fayre, Village Carol Singing 25th Christmas Day McCandlish Hall, 11am - 3pm 6th Trip to Pantomime in Ayr, January 18th Knockskae Wind Farm coaches leave at 6pm 1st New Year’s Day Exhibition, McCandlish Hall, 4 - 15th School Pantomime, 6th School re-opens 7.30pm McCandlish Hall, 7pm 22nd Wine and Whisky Tasting, 27th Community Council Meeting, 16th Community Council Meeting, Crosshill, 7.30pm Tickets £15, Dalduff 7.30pm Kirkmichael, 7.30pm an elephant ride in her wedding e Minister Writes How to contact gown).
    [Show full text]
  • Child Sexual Exploitation and the Response to Localised Grooming
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Child sexual exploitation and the response to localised grooming Second Report of Session 2013–14 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 16 and 31 October, 13, 20 and 27 November, and 11 December 2012, 15 January, and 16, 18 and 23 April 2013 Published on 12 June 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Keith Vaz MP (Labour, Leicester East) (Chair) Nicola Blackwood MP (Conservative, Oxford West and Abingdon) James Clappison MP (Conservative, Hertsmere) Michael Ellis MP (Conservative, Northampton North) Lorraine Fullbrook MP (Conservative, South Ribble) Dr Julian Huppert MP (Liberal Democrat, Cambridge) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham Selly Oak) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) Mark Reckless MP (Conservative, Rochester and Strood) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Mr David Winnick MP (Labour, Walsall North) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the Parliament. Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour & Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Karl Turner MP (Labour, Kingston upon Hull East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN CHANNELS Public Dialogue in Science and Technology
    Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology OPEN CHANNELS Public dialogue in science and technology Report No. 153 March 2001 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF THE PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2001 OFFICERS CHAIRMAN: Dr Ian Gibson MP VICE-CHAIRMAN: Lord Flowers FRS DIRECTOR: Professor David Cope PARLIAMENTARY MEMBERS House of Lords The Earl of Erroll Lord Oxburgh, KBE, PhD, FRS Professor the Lord Winston House of Commons Mr Richard Allan MP Mrs Anne Campbell MP Dr Michael Clark MP Mr Michael Connarty MP Mr Paul Flynn MP Dr Ashok Kumar MP Mrs Caroline Spelman MP Dr Phyllis Starkey MP Mr Ian Taylor, MBE, MP NON PARLIAMENTARY MEMBERS Professor Sir Tom Blundell, FRS Professor Jim Norton, FIEE, FRSA Sir David Davies, CBE, FREng, FRS Dr Frances Balkwill EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS Clerk of the House: represented by Mr Malcolm Jack Librarian of the House of Commons: represented by Mr Christopher Barclay Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology OPEN CHANNELS Public dialogue in science and technology Report No. 153 April 2001 Primary Author: Gary Kass POST would like to thank the following organisations and individuals for their information and comment @Bristol Agriculture an Environment Biotechnology Commission Association of British Healthcare Industries Association of Independent Research and Technology Organisations British Association for the Advancement of Science British Council British Energy Cabinet Office Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, University Confederation of British Industry of Lancaster Construction
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT+ Conservatives Annual Report 2020.Pdf
    LGBT+ CONSERVATIVES TEAM April 2019 - July 20201 OFFICERS CHAIRMAN - Colm Howard-Lloyd DEPUTY CHAIRMAN - John Cope HONORARY SECRETARY - Niall McDougall HONORARY TREASURER - Cllr. Sean Anstee CBE VICE-CHAIRMAN CANDIDATES’ FUND - Cllr. Scott Seaman-Digby VICE-CHAIRMAN COMMUNICATIONS - Elena Bunbury (resigned Dec 2019) VICE-CHAIRMAN EVENTS - Richard Salt MEMBERSHIP OFFICER - Ben Joce STUDENT OFFICER - Jason Birt (resigned Sept 2019) GENERAL COUNCIL Cllr. Andrew Jarvie Barry Flux David Findlay Dolly Theis Cllr. Joe Porter Owen Meredith Sue Pascoe Xavier White REGIONAL COORDINATORS EAST MIDLANDS - David Findlay EAST OF ENGLAND - Thomas Smith LONDON - Charley Jarrett NORTH EAST - Barry Flux SCOTLAND - Andrew Jarvie WALES - Mark Brown WEST MIDLANDS - John Gardiner YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER - Cllr. Jacob Birch CHAIRMAN’S REPORT After a decade with LGBT+ Conservatives, more than half of them in the chair, it’s time to hand-on the baton I’m not disappearing completely. One of my proudest achievements here has been the LGBT+ Conservatives Candidates’ Fund, which has supported so many people into parliament and raised tens of thousands of pounds. As the fund matures it is moving into a new governance structure, and I hope to play a role in that future. I am thrilled to be succeeded by Elena Bunbury. I know that she will bring new energy to the organisation, and I hope it will continue to thrive under her leadership. I am so grateful to everyone who has supported me on this journey. In particular Emma Warman, Matthew Green and John Cope who have provided wise counsel as Deputy Chairman. To Sean Anstee who has transformed the finances of the organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prime Minister, HC 833
    Liaison Committee Oral evidence: The Prime Minister, HC 833 Tuesday 20 December 2016 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 20 Dec 2016. Watch the meeting Members present: Mr Andrew Tyrie (Chair); Hilary Benn; Mr Clive Betts; Crispin Blunt; Andrew Bridgen; Sir William Cash; Yvette Cooper; Meg Hillier; Mr Bernard Jenkin; Dr Julian Lewis; Stephen Metcalfe; Mr Laurence Robertson; Dame Rosie Winterton; Pete Wishart; Dr Sarah Wollaston; Mr Iain Wright. Questions 1-129 Witness [I]: Rt Hon Mrs Theresa May Examination of witness Witness: Rt Hon Mrs Theresa May Q1 Chair: Prime Minister, thank you very much for coming to give evidence to us this afternoon. We are very grateful, and I think Parliament is also very grateful, that you are agreeing to do these sessions. Could I just have confirmation that you are going to continue the practice of your predecessor of three a year? Mrs May: Yes, indeed, Chairman. I am happy to do three attendances at this Committee a year. Q2 Chair: Logically, bearing in mind the very big events likely to take place at the end of March, it might be sensible to push scrutiny of the triggering, or proposed triggering, of article 50, and any accompanying Government documents, to after the spring recess. Then we will have two meetings: one right at the beginning and one towards the end of the summer session. Mrs May: That may very well be sensible, Chairman. I suggest that perhaps the Clerk and my office will be able to talk about possible dates. Obviously the Committee will have a view as to when they wish to do it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Costs of Replacing Trident
    The costs of replacing Trident ND has calculated that replacing Trident, Britain’s nuclear weapons system, will end up costing at least £205 billion, and that’s Cbefore taking into account that Ministry of Defence projects typically go well over budget. The costs of replacing Trident Manufacturing four successor submarines £31 billion 1 Contingency fund £10 billion 2 Missile extension programme £350 million 3 Replacement warheads £4 billion 4 Infrastructure capital costs £4 billion 5 In service costs £142 billion 6 Conventional military forces directly assigned to support Trident £1 billion 7 Decommissioning £13 billion 8 TOTAL £205 billion Parliament voted in July 2016 to go ahead with building new submarines, the delivery vehicles for the nuclear missiles. In its National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review, published in November 2015, the government announced a huge increase in the estimated cost of these submarines to £31 billion. Additionally, a contingency fund of £10 billion was allocated to the project. The UK leases the missiles for the nuclear weapons system from the United States and will participate in that country’s missile life extension programme so that they can be used until the early 2040s. As set out in the government’s 2006 White Paper on ‘The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent’ , this will cost £250 million, or £350 million in today’s prices. The 2006 White Paper also stated that the current warhead will last into the 2020s and provided for up to £3 billion for the possible future refurbishment or replacement of the warhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Party Funding
    1071 Party Funding.qxd 30/11/04 11:32 Page a3 December 2004 The funding of political parties Report and recommendations 1071 Party Funding.qxd 30/11/04 11:32 Page a4 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact The Electoral Commission: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The Electoral Commission We are an independent body that was set up by the UK Parliament. We aim to gain public confidence and encourage people to take part in the democratic process within the UK by modernising the electoral process, promoting public awareness of electoral matters and regulating political parties. The funding of political parties Report and recommendations Copyright © The Electoral Commission 2004 ISBN: 1-904363-54-7 1071 Party Funding.qxd 30/11/04 11:32 Page 1 1 Contents Executive summary 3 Financial implications of limiting donations 84 Commission position 86 1Introduction 7 Political parties 7 6Public funding of political parties 89 Review process 9 Background 89 Priorities 10 Direct public funding 90 Scope 10 Indirect public funding 92 Stakeholders’ views 94 2 Attitudes towards the funding of Commission position 97 political parties 13 Reforming the policy development Research 13 grant scheme 97 Public opinion 14 New forms of public funding 98 Party activists 20 Attitudes towards implementation 23 7 The way forward 103 The importance of political parties 103 3Party income and expenditure 25 The way forward 104 The
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Leadership and standards in the police Third Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I HC 67-I House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Leadership and standards
    [Show full text]
  • Defence and Security After Brexit Understanding the Possible Implications of the UK’S Decision to Leave the EU Compendium Report
    Defence and security after Brexit Understanding the possible implications of the UK’s decision to leave the EU Compendium report James Black, Alex Hall, Kate Cox, Marta Kepe, Erik Silfversten For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1786 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: HMS Vanguard (MoD/Crown copyright 2014); Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoon FGR4, A Chinook Helicopter of 18 Squadron, HMS Defender (MoD/Crown copyright 2016); Cyber Security at MoD (Crown copyright); Brexit (donfiore/fotolia); Heavily armed Police in London (davidf/iStock) RAND Europe is a not-for-profit organisation whose mission is to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org www.rand.org/randeurope Defence and security after Brexit Preface This RAND study examines the potential defence and security implications of the United Kingdom’s (UK) decision to leave the European Union (‘Brexit’).
    [Show full text]