DOCSLIB.ORG

Merkinės Miestelio Esamos Infrastruktūros Pritaikymas Turizmo Reikmėms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Merkinės Miestelio Esamos Infrastruktūros Pritaikymas Turizmo Reikmėms Merkinės miestelio esamos infrastruktūros pritaikymas turizmo reikmėms INVESTICIJŲ PROJEKTAS 11/28/2016 Viešoji įstaiga „DTI Management“ Vilnius TURINYS SANTRAUKA .................................................................................................................................. 4 NAUDOJAMOS SĄVOKOS ............................................................................................................ 6 LENTELIŲ SĄRAŠAS ..................................................................................................................... 7 PAVEIKSLŲ SĄRAŠAS .................................................................................................................. 8 1. PROJEKTO KONTEKSTAS..................................................................................................... 9 1.1. Socialinė-ekonominė aplinka ............................................................................................ 9 1.1.1. Projekto socialinis ir ekonominis kontekstas .............................................................. 9 1.1.2. Atvykstamojo turizmo galimybės .............................................................................. 18 1.2. Teisinė aplinka ................................................................................................................ 21 1.3. Sprendžiamos problemos ............................................................................................... 23 1.1.1. Panašių objektų kompleksinis pritaikymas turizmo reikmėms .................................. 24 1.4. Tikslinių grupių poreikiai.................................................................................................. 24 2. PROJEKTO TURINYS ........................................................................................................... 26 2.1. Projekto tikslas ............................................................................................................... 26 2.2. Projekto sąsajos su kitais projektais ............................................................................... 26 2.3. Projekto ribos .................................................................................................................. 28 2.3.1. Seinų g.1, Merkinės miestelis .................................................................................. 30 2.3.2. Gardino g.28, Merkinės miestelis ............................................................................. 32 2.4. Projekto tikslinės grupės ................................................................................................. 34 2.5. Projekto uždaviniai .......................................................................................................... 34 2.6. Projekto organizacija ...................................................................................................... 34 2.7. Siekiami rezultatai........................................................................................................... 36 3. GALIMYBĖS IR ALTERNATYVOS ........................................................................................ 37 3.1. Esama situacija .............................................................................................................. 37 3.2. Galimos projekto veiklos ................................................................................................. 38 3.2.1. Alternatyva Nr. 1 „Pastato Seinų g. 1 techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ ..................................................................................... 39 3.2.2. Alternatyva Nr. 2 „Pastatų Gardino g. 28 techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ .................................................................................. 39 3.2.3. Alternatyva Nr. 3 „Seinų g. 1 ir Gardino g. 28 pastatų techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ .............................................................. 40 3.2.4. Alternatyva Nr. 4 „Parduoti Seinų g. 1 ir Gardino g. 28 esančius pastatus ir įsigyti, naują pastatą geresnių techninių charakteristikų pastatą“ ...................................................... 40 4. FINANSINĖ ANALIZĖ ............................................................................................................ 41 4.2. Projekto ataskaitinis laikotarpis ....................................................................................... 41 4.3. Finansinė diskonto norma ............................................................................................... 41 4.4. Investicijų vertė ............................................................................................................... 41 4.3.1. Alternatyvos Nr. 1 „Pastato Seinų g. 1 techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ investicijų vertė ............................................................ 41 4.3.2. Alternatyvos Nr. 2 „Pastatų Gardino g. 28 techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ investicijų vertė ......................................................... 42 4.3.3. Alternatyvos Nr. 3 „Seinų g. 1 ir Gardino g. 28 pastatų techninių bei funkcinių savybių pagerinimas ir pritaikymas teikti turizmo paslaugas“ investicijų vertė ..................................... 43 4.5. Reinvesticijos .................................................................................................................. 44 4.6. Investicijų likutinė vertė ................................................................................................... 44 4.7. Veiklos pajamos ............................................................................................................. 45 4.8. Veiklos išlaidos ............................................................................................................... 48 4.9. Mokesčiai ....................................................................................................................... 50 4.10. Projekto finansavimo šaltiniai ...................................................................................... 50 4.11. Vertinamų alternatyvų finansiniai rodikliai .................................................................... 50 5. EKONOMINĖ ANALIZĖ ......................................................................................................... 52 5.2. Rinkos kainų perskaičiavimas į ekonomines ................................................................... 52 5.3. Išorinio poveikio vertinimas ............................................................................................. 52 5.4. Socialinė diskonto norma ................................................................................................ 55 5.5. Ekonominių rodiklių apskaičiavimas ................................................................................ 55 5.6. Optimalios alternatyvos pasirinkimas .............................................................................. 56 6. JAUTRUMAS IR RIZIKOS ..................................................................................................... 57 6.2. Jautrumo analizė ............................................................................................................ 57 6.3. Scenarijų analizė ............................................................................................................ 60 6.4. Kintamųjų tikimybių skirstinių nustatymas ....................................................................... 61 6.5. Rizikos įverčių apskaičiavimas ........................................................................................ 62 6.6. Rizikos priimtinumo įvertinimas ....................................................................................... 65 6.7. Rizikos valdymo priemonių apibūdinimas ....................................................................... 68 7. ĮGYVENDINIMO PLANAS ..................................................................................................... 71 7.2. Investicijų projekto trukmė ir etapai ................................................................................. 71 7.3. Investicijų projekto vieta .................................................................................................. 73 7.4. Investicijų projekto komanda ........................................................................................... 73 7.5. Investicijų projekto prielaidos ir tęstinumas ..................................................................... 73 IŠVADOS ...................................................................................................................................... 74 1 priedas ....................................................................................................................................... 76 2 priedas ....................................................................................................................................... 77 3 priedas ....................................................................................................................................... 79 4 priedas ....................................................................................................................................... 82 5 priedas ....................................................................................................................................... 86 6 priedas ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alternative Food Networks: How Artisan Cheese Reconnects Producer, Consumer and Nature
    Aalborg University Development and International Relations Master’s thesis Alternative Food Networks: how artisan cheese reconnects producer, consumer and nature Source: Creamery “Varinis puodas” Author: Asta Slapikaitė Supervisor: Henrik Plaschke November 2017 Abstract The conventional agro-food system is a great achievement of the 21st century, involving industrialization and globalization of the food sector and complex food supply chains. On the one hand, it provides a great variety of food emerging from different parts of the world; on the other hand, it disconnects people from the places where food is grown. The industrial food system is also connected with climate change processes through unsustainable agricultural practices, long transportation distances and other factors. Different production processes and artificial additives in the food as well as in animal feed are connected with outbreaks of food scares such as BSE and the contamination of eggs with the insecticide fipronil. This causes governments and consumers alike to question the safety of the food system. Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) emerged as a response to negative economic, social and ecological effects in the conventional food system. The European Commission (EC) has also started to pay more attention to the importance of the agro-food sector relocalization by shortening supply chains. Short food supply chains (SFSCs) are seen as a means to reconnect production and consumption practices, and also as a way to increase food quality. In this master thesis, small-scale farming is analyzed in a rural Lithuanian context, taking the example of local artisan cheese producers. These small-scale cheesemakers form alternatives to the conventional modes of food provisioning by producing cheese from the raw milk of their own animals kept in their farms and then selling it directly to the consumers or through a single intermediary.
    [Show full text]
  • ALYTUS Sport and Recreation
    ALYTUS sport and recreation ALYTUS is the largest southern town of Lithuania. 16 km of the loop of Nemunas with picturesque forests, green hills surrounds Alytus. Alytus is a town in a park. More than a third of the territory of the city is covered with green areas. Alytus is known as one of the sports tourism attraction centers of Lithuania. Every year different national and inter- national sports events are organized here. The town hosted one of the stages of the 2011 FIBA European Men Basket- ball Championship, 2013 UEFA European U-19 Champion- ship matches, European U-17 Championship matches. In 2011, Alytus was declared the top sports town of Lit huania. Alytus men handball (Almeida-Stronglasas), basketball (Dzūkija), football (Dainava) teams play in the premier sports leagues of Lithuania, men (ASRC-Almeida-Strongla- sas), women handball (ASRC-Margiris), women basketball (Alytus RKL) teams play in the first leagues of the country. Sport is becoming a more and more important recreational activity; therefore it is the focus of Alytus city municipali- ty. Residents of the town, including students, are able to choose one of 20 sports in the Sports and Recreation Center or participate in the activities of 65 sports clubs and public organizations. New objects of sports infrastructure allowing the residents and guests of the town to be active during their free-time are reconstructed or constructed every year. The recon- structed Sports and Recreation Center arena is suitable for international tournaments of the highest level. The reno- vated center also has a 50 meter 8 lane swimming pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Action Plan Baltic Environmental Forum Lithuania Elvyra Mikšytė, Justas Gulbinas, Audronė Alijošiutė - Paulauskienė
    Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Action Plan Baltic Environmental Forum Lithuania Elvyra Mikšytė, Justas Gulbinas, Audronė Alijošiutė - Paulauskienė 1. Case Area Description The Dovinė River Catchment covers an area of approximately 588.7 km2 and is located in the southern part of Lithuania (see Figure 1). The basin is one of the small catchment areas of the larger Neman river basin, which covers around 75% of the territory of Lithuania and is the 4th river basin in size in the whole Baltic Sea Region. The Dovinė river catchment is located in the southern Lithuania (see Figure 2) and consists of a network of rivers and water bodies formed by five big lakes (Dusia 23,3 km2, Zuvintas 9,3 km2, Figure 1. Location of Dovinė Catchment area. Simnas 2,4 km2, Giluitis 2,4 km2, Amalvas 1,9 Source: Nature Heritage Fund km2) and a number of rivulets and small lakes (see Annex 1). Within the borders of the basin lies one of the oldest and most unique protected areas of Lithuania – Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve. The reserve lies in the junction of three municipalities (Alytus district municipality, Lazdijai district municipality and Marijampolė municipality). This one of the most valuable Natura 2000 territories in the country hosts valuable habitats for biodiversity, breeding and feeding areas for protected species, especially migratory birds (see Figure 2). Figure 2. A gaggle of geese flocking in Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve during migration. Source: Žuvintas Biosphere Reserve Directorate 1 A lot of species found in the area are listed in the Birds Directive Annex 1 and the Habitats Directive Annex 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Priebalsių Š, Ž Kietinimas Prieš E, Ė, Ę, En Apie Šių Priebalsių Kietinimą
    KALBOTYRA XXIII (1) 1971 PRIEBALSIŲ KIETINIMAS LIETUVIŲ KALBOS TARMĖsE 1. Priebalsių Š, ž kietinimas prieš e, ė, ę, en Ž. URBANAVIČIOTĖ Apie šių priebalsių kietinimą pradėta rašyti tik pastaraisiais metais. Be skyriaus apie priebalsių kietinimą Z. Zinkevičiaus "Lietuvių dialektologijoje" ir T. Buch straipsnioI, jie niekur plačiau nebuvo nagrinėti. Priebalsiai Š, ž kietai tariami prieš e, ė, ę, en žymiai mažesniame plote, negu J, r, s, z. Prieš e jie kietinami pietų aukštaičių tarmės pietinėje dalyje ir artimesnėse vakarų aukštaičių šnektose į pietus nuo ribos Liubavas - Sangrūda - Rudamina­ Šventežeris-Seirijai-tarp Savilionių ir Kibyšių-Merkinė- Zervynos-Rudnia­ Rodūnia. Eišiškių, Šalčininkų, Dieveniškių, Lazūnų, Zietelos apylinkes į kietini­ mo plotą galima įskirti tik sąlygiškai, nes ten šių priebalsių kietinimas labai nenuo­ seklus, pVZ.: žamė, ažaras, žamas, šašbl, berža!is ir žiimė, šlire, beržii!is, ašeri's, šešeli (Eišiškės); žamė ir žiimė, šlire, beržii!is, šeiva (Vėžionys); žanijas ir šešta (Šalčininkai); parša!is, aršaĮi<J "veršelis", š3iva ir žiimė, žemaū, šiištas, veršii!is (Dieveniškės); žamė" zamė, šapeteis, šašbl, šašatas, šarb;'s, važa!is, naimažasnis ir ziimė, žemi'n, šešta, šeši, šiišetas, šeim{'na (Zietela) ir pan. Priebalsiai š, ž sporadiškai kietinami ir kitose šnektose, neretai net gana toli i šiaurę nuo nu­ rodytos ribos. Daugiausia tokio kietinimo atvejų galima išgirsti tose tarmėse, kur gyventojai daž• nai vartoja lenkų ar baltarusių kalbą. Toks kietinimas žymiai dažniau pasitaiko prieš balsi e, pvz.: žani'su, ažaras (Breslauja), &žaras, žame., Šašu.pe., šaimi'na, šara, gegužala. - geguželė, ša/us (Apsas), ša/uos (Arnionys, Lakaja), žame, šara, pušal/.nis "pušinis" (Šumskas), šašazdešime (Šu• tai), žJmi., diržalis, paršalis (Nemenčinė), žiim(! (Baltamiškis), ždnklas (Slučajus), žiimė, žanras, šiišras, šare (Ismonys), ažarelis (Perloja), ša/alika (Šašuolėliai), žame, Žalva (Inturkė) ir pan.
    [Show full text]
  • Alytaus Alytaus Miesto (Alytaus Miesto Savivaldybė) Alytus Infrastruktūrinis Objektas Infrastruktūrinis Objektas Pulko G
    Nr. Apskritis Savivaldybė Seniūnija Gyvenvietė Objekto tipas Įstaigos pavadinimas Adresas 1 Alytaus Alytaus miesto (Alytaus miesto savivaldybė) Alytus Infrastruktūrinis objektas Infrastruktūrinis objektas Pulko g. 12, Alytus 2 Alytaus Alytaus miesto (Alytaus miesto savivaldybė) Alytus Mokymo įstaiga Alytaus rajono sporto centras Kepyklos g. 17, Alytus 3 Alytaus Alytaus miesto (Alytaus miesto savivaldybė) Alytus Infrastruktūrinis objektas Infrastruktūrinis objektas Alytus 4 Alytaus Alytaus miesto (Alytaus miesto savivaldybė) Alytus Savivaldybė Alytaus m. savivaldybės administracija Rotušės a. 4, LT-62504 Alytus 5 Alytaus Alytaus miesto (Alytaus miesto savivaldybė) Alytus Infrastruktūrinis objektas Infrastruktūrinis objektas Stoties g. 12, LT-62431 Alytus 6 Alytaus Alytaus rajono (Alytaus rajono savivaldybė) Alytus Savivaldybė Alytaus r. savivaldybės administracija Pulko g. 21, LT-62135 Alytus 7 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Alovės Alovė Mokymo įstaiga Alytaus rajono Alovės pagrindinė mokykla Mokyklos g. 5 , Alovė, LT-64117 Alytaus r. 8 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Alovės Alovė Seniūnija Alovės seniūnija Alovė, LT-64117 Alytaus r. 9 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Alytaus Miklusėnai Infrastruktūrinis objektas Infrastruktūrinis objektas Miklusėnai, Alytaus r. 10 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Alytaus Miklusėnai Seniūnija Alytaus seniūnija Užubalių g. 3, Miklusėnai, Alytaus r. 11 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Butrimonių Butrimonys Seniūnija Butrimonių seniūnija Vytauto g. 31, Butrimonys, LT-64429 Alytaus r. 12 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Daugų Daugai Seniūnija Daugų seniūnija S. Nėries g. 3, Daugai, LT-64140 Alytaus r. 13 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Krokialaukio Krokialaukis Mokymo įstaiga Alytaus rajono Krokialaukio Tomo Noraus-Naruševičiaus vidurinė mokykla Žuvinto g. 41, Krokialaukis, LT-64355 Alytaus r. 14 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Krokialaukio Krokialaukis Seniūnija Krokialaukio seniūnija Krokialaukis, LT-64355 Alytaus r. 15 Alytaus Alytaus rajono Miroslavo Miroslavas Seniūnija Miroslavo seniūnija Miroslavas, LT-64235 Alytaus r.
    [Show full text]
  • The Morphology of Lithuanian Toponyms – Differences and Parallels of Different Classes of Names
    HARALD BICHLMEIER Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Fields of resea rch: onomastics (toponymy), historical phonology of the Germanic languages, Indo-European linguistics, Aljamiado-texts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35321/all82-06 THE MORPHOLOGY OF LITHUANIAN TOPONYMS – DIFFERENCES AND PARALLELS OF DIFFERENT CLASSES OF NAMES Lietuvių toponimijos morfologija – įvairių vardų grupių skirtumai ir paralelės ANNOTATION The participation in the project “Vakarinių pietų aukštaičių vietovardžių integravimas į Lietuvos vietovardžių geoinformacinę duomenų bazę ir jų kilmės bei motyvacijos tyrimai” [The integration of Western South Aukštaitian toponyms into the Lituanian geoinformational database and studies on their origin and motivation] led to two interesting results: 1) It seems necessary to refine (Lithuanian) terminology and 2) there can be found remarkable differences in the percentage of the morphological (and syntactical) structures used to build names for flowing bodies of water (potamonyms) and names for standing bodies of water (limnonyms). It turns out that in the researched area in limnonyms the percentage of deri- vational formations is significantly higher and that of compound names significantly lower than in potamonyms. More research needs to be done to find out, whether this is a charac- teristic of the researched area or a general tendency all over Lithuania. KEYWORDS: potamonyms/river-names, limnonyms/lake-names, morphology of onyms, syntactical structure of onyms, western
    [Show full text]
  • Accentuation Models of Disyllabic Nouns in the Southern Aukštaitian Dialect
    ISSN 1392–1517. Online ISSN 2029–8315. KALBOTYRA. 2016 • 68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2016.10321 Accentuation models of disyllabic nouns in the Southern Aukštaitian dialect Vilija Ragaišienė Institute of the Lithuanian Language P. Vileišio g. 5 LT-10308 Vilnius, Lithuania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The article provides an analysis of the accentuation of disyllabic nouns in the Southern Aukštaitian (SAuk) dialect spoken in Southern Lithuania (Alytus, Lazdijai, Varėna, Šalčininkai, Druskininkai and Trakai districts). The term pietų aukštaičiai (southern Aukštaitians) was coined by scholars; because of certain phonetic peculiarities of the dialect, the inhabitants of southern Lithuania consider themselves to be dzūkai (Dzūkians). The SAuk has been of special interest to both dialectologists and Baltic language specialists for a long time. The archaic grammatical forms, syntactic constructions, phonetic, accentual and lexical peculiarities that are features of these dialects are intertwined with new phenomena and thus reveal many stages of the development of the dialect of the Southern Aukštaitians, which in turn can be of help in finding answers to some unanswered questions about the development and usage of language. For this reason more attention and research has been devoted to the SAuk dialect and its broader connections with language as a whole. The article analyses the tendencies of the accentuation parallels of disyllabic nouns with ā, ē, a and i̯ a1 stems in the SAuk dialect. Drawing on audio and written sources dating from 1952–2015, the spread of the accentuation variants of the words and their forms in the same subdialect, separate subdialects and/or their groups are discussed; the accentuation patterns of disyllabic nouns with the productive ā, ē, a and i̯ a1 stems that are stressed in various ways are described, and the nature of their prevalence in the area of the dialect is established.
    [Show full text]
  • Version of 09/04/2008 PG
    LIFE09NAT/LT/00581 Mid-term Report Covering the project activities from 01-10-2010 to 30-09-2012 Reporting Date 01/11/2012 ECONAT Development of Pilot Ecological Network through Nature Frame Areas in Southern Lithuania Data Project Project location Lithuania: Alytus, Lazdijai, Varena districts Project start date: 01-10-2010 Project end date: 30-09-2014 Total budget € 766 260 EC contribution: € 381 150 (%) of eligible costs 49.79 Data Beneficiary Name Beneficiary Lithuanian Fund for Nature Contact person Ms Dalia Bastyte Postal address Algirdo g. 22-3, LT-03218 Vilnius Telephone +370 5 2310700 Fax: +370 5 2310441 E-mail [email protected] Project Website www.glis.lt/ekotinklas 1. Table of contents 2. List of key-words and abbreviations .......................................................................... 4 3. Executive summary ................................................................................................... 5 3.1. General progress .................................................................................................. 5 3.2. Assessment as to whether the project objectives and work plan are still viable. 5 3.3. Problems encountered ......................................................................................... 7 4. Administrative part ..................................................................................................... 7 5. Technical part ............................................................................................................. 9 5.1. Actions ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BALTIC SEA REGION CLUBS GOLF TOURNAMENT 2016 (FOUR TEAMS) Regulations of the Tournament
    BALTIC SEA REGION CLUBS GOLF TOURNAMENT 2016 (FOUR TEAMS) Regulations of the tournament TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP 2016 (FOUR TEAMS) Location, date and time Location: the Wolf Golf Course, Kamorūnų village, Leipalingis ward, Druskininkai municipality, Lithuania Date: 17th and 18th of September, 2016 (Saturday and Sunday) Event schedule for 17th of September (Saturday): Arrival and registration begins at 8:00 AM. (GMT +2); Start: 9:00 AM (GMT +2); 2 players in one flight, from the 1st and 10th holes. Event schedule for 18th of September (Sunday): Arrival and registration begins at 8:00 AM. (GMT +2); Start: 10:00 AM (GMT +2); 2 players in one flight, from the 1st and 10th holes. Format of the tournament Type of the event: match play, single (without HCP) (men and ladies); Form of competition: team (10 + 2 reserves; the team will have a opportunity to change two players before every round), in total – 6 teams; Coverage: Saturday – 27 (9+9+9) holes, Sunday – 18 holes; Teeing ground: men – yellow; ladies – red. Schedule Schedule for 17th of September (Saturday) (9+9+9 holes): Time Hole Match 9:00 1 A1 B1 9:00 10 A6 B6 9:08 1 C1 D1 9:08 10 C6 D6 9:16 1 A2 B2 9:16 10 A7 B7 9:24 1 C2 D2 9:24 10 C7 D7 9:32 1 A3 B3 9:32 10 A8 B8 9:40 1 C3 D3 9:40 10 C8 D8 9:48 1 A4 B4 9:48 10 A9 B9 9:56 1 C4 D4 2 9:56 10 C9 D9 10:04 1 A5 B5 10:04 10 A10 B10 10:12 1 C5 D5 10:12 10 C10 D10 SNACKS 11:30 10 A1 C1 11:30 1 A6 C6 11:38 10 B1 D1 11:38 1 B6 D6 11:46 10 A2 C2 11:46 1 A7 C7 11:54 10 B2 D2 11:54 1 B7 D7 12:02 10 A3 C3 12:02 1 A8 C8 12:10 10 B3 D3 12:10 1 B8
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY of Disertation2014 02 17-2
    VILNIUS UNIVERSITY NATURE RESEARCH CENTRE INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOGRAPHY VIOLETA PUKELYT Ė BALTR ŪNIEN Ė THE INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOMORPHOLOGICAL REGIONS (CASE STUDY OF SOUTH LITHUANIA) Summary of Doctoral Dissertation Physical sciences, Physical geography (06 P) Vilnius, 2014 The dissertation was prepared at the Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography in 2009–2012. Scientific supervisor Prof. Dr. Hab. Algimantas Česnulevi čius (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P) The dissertation is defended at the Council of Geographical Research of Vilnius University: Chairman Prof. Dr. Ar ūnas Bukantis (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Members: Prof. Dr. Inga Dailidien ė (Klaip ėda University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Dr. Virgilija Gregorauskien ė (Lithuanian Geological Survey under the Ministry of Environment, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Prof. Dr. Egidijus Rimkus (Vilnius University, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Doc. Dr. Julius Taminskas (Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). Opponents: Dr. Albertas Bitinas (Klaip ėda University, Physical sciences, Geology – 05 P). Dr. Darius Jarmalavi čius (Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography, Physical sciences, Physical geography – 06 P). The official defence of the dissertation is due to be held at the public meeting of the Physical Science Council at the Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography on March 25, 2014, at 15.00 Address: T. Šev čenkos str. 13, LT-03223, Vilnius, Lithuania. The summary of the dissertation was distributed on February 24, 2014 The dissertation is available in the libraries of Vilnius University and Nature Research Centre, Institute of Geology and Geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Alytus District 23 Raižiai Mosque B5 24 Chapel in Bukaučiškės D6 a 25 St
    1 URBAN AND ARCHITECTURAL VALUES 1 Historical centre of Butrimonys B5 2 Historical centre of Daugai C6 3 Historical centre of Simnas C1 4 Architectural ensemble of Kurnėnai School C3 5 Memorial Farmstead and place of birth of the painter Antanas Žmuidzinavičius C3 6 Alovė St. Trinity Church C5 7 Butrimonys Jesus Christ the Saviour Church B5 8 Daugai Providence of God Church C6 9 Kriokialaukis Transfiguration Church B2 10 Miroslavas Holy Trinity Church D3 11 Nemunaitis Birth of Blessed Mary Virgin Church D4 12 Pivašiūnai Assumption of Blessed Mary Virgin Church B6 12 29 30 68 13 Punia St. Jacob Apostle Church B4 14 Rumbonys Holy Trinity Church B4 15 Simnas Assumption of Blessed Mary Virgin Church C1 Geruliai Mound A5 Kaukai Mound C2 Žaltė valley A4 “Tarzanija” Adveture Park C4 Lake Daugai C6 Bird observation tower in Žuvintas Pivašiūnai Assumption of Blessed Mary Virgin Church B6 Biosphere Reserve B1 16 Alytus Holy Angels Custodians Church C4 17 Photo by M. Šematulskis, G. Bernatavičius, Z. Bulgakovas, A.Pranaitis, Z. Stankevičienė, M. Gudzinevičius, L. Mitrulevičius, B. Malaškevičiūtė Alytus St. Ludvick Church C4 18 Alytus Holy Mary, Help of Christians Church C4 1 2 3 4 5 6 19 Alytus St. Casimir Church C4 20 Church of Sacred Heart of Jesus in Ūdrija B3 21 Christ the King Church in Santaika C2 22 Church of St. Monica in Ryliškiai E4 Alytus District 23 Raižiai Mosque B5 24 Chapel in Bukaučiškės D6 A 25 St. George Chapel in Punia B4 26 Chapel in Balkasodis D4 27 Manor of Dapkiškės C3 79 MOUNDS 38 Olakalnis Hill C3 28 Bambininkai Mound B1
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Report No: ICR000052 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IBRD-70140) Public Disclosure Authorized ON A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$35.36 MILLION TO LITHUANIA FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized KLAIPEDA PORT PROJECT June 24, 2009 Public Disclosure Authorized Sustainable Development Department South Central Europe and Baltics Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective May 4, 2009) Currency Unit = Litas 1.00 = US$ 0.386 US$ 1.00 = 2.599 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS Country Assistance Strategy KSSA Klaipeda State Seaport Authority CDF Confined Disposal Facility LISCO Lithuanian Shipping Company CEEC Central and Eastern European Countries LR Lithuanian Railways CIS Commonwealth of Independent States LRA Lithuanian Road Administration CMEA Council for Mutual Economic Assistance MOE Ministry of Energy EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction & Dev. MOT Ministry of Transport EIB European Investment Bank MT Million Tons EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return NPV Net Present Value FMS Financial Management System OED Operations Evaluation Department FSU Former Soviet Union PHRD Policy and Human Resource Development GDP Gross Domestic Product PIU Project Implementation Unit GPN General Procurement Notice SA Special Account IAS International Accounting Standards SAL Structural Adjustment Loan ICB International Competitive Bidding SOE Statement of Expenditure ICR Implementation Completion Report SPN Special Procurement Notice IMO International Maritime Organization TEU Twenty Foot Equivalent Units KLASCO Klaipeda Stevedoring Company Vice President: Shigeo Katsu Country Director: Theodore Ahlers (Acting) Sector Manager: Henry G. R. Kerali Project Team Leader: Henry G. R. Kerali ICR Team Leader: Ross Pavis LITHUANIA KLAIPEDA PORT PROJECT CONTENTS Data Sheet A.
    [Show full text]