DOCSLIB.ORG

Before the International Tribunal for Natural Justice in the Constitutional

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Before the International Tribunal for Natural Justice in the Constitutional Before the International Tribunal for Natural Justice And In the Constitutional Court of South Africa Constitutional Court Case No: UZA court of record case no: 2013/06/S11 In the matter between: Unified Common Law Grand Jury of Southern Africa Hereinafter UZA: court of record and lawful representatives of we, the people of the original Republic of South Africa Demandants also known as Plaintiffs and the following people, acting as: Justices of the Constitutional Court of South Africa 1st Tenants also known as 1st Defendants Chief Justice: Mogoeng Mogoeng Deputy Chief Justice: Gikgang Moseneke Justice: Justice Bess Nkabinde Justice Chris Jafta Justice Edwin Cameron Justice Johan Froneman Justice Johann van der Westhuizen Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga Justice Ray Zondo Justice Sisi 1 As well as all the people acting on behalf of the following: Judicial Services Commission 2nd Tenants As well as: 2nd Defendants The National Prosecuting Authority of South Africa 3rd Tenants As well as: 3rd Defendants The Minister of Justice and Correctional Services 4th Tenants As well as: 4th Defendants Deputy Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development 5th Tenants As well as: 5th Defendants “All” Agents, “ALL” Attorneys, All” Assigns, “All” Bar Associations, “All” Chief Clerks, “All” Clerks, All CEOs, “All” Counsellors, “All” executive administrators, “All” Magistrates, “All” Law Societies, “All” Masters, “All” Officers, “All” Registrars, “All” Sheriffs and “All” other acting Agents of the REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA or any derivatives thereof; Co-Tenants Co-Defendants Founding Affidavit Notice to principal is notice to agent Notice to agent is notice to principal Be Pleased To Take Judicial Recognizance That we, the people on the land of Southern Africa hereby declare that this is private communication and not a PUBLIC communication and that the Justices see this Affidavit as an invitation to participate and to give guidance by our herein terms and as to the extraordinary remedies proposed, rather than viewing this writ as an indictment according to the herein charges; Whereas without any prejudice, we begin by referring to a point made by Albie Sachs just before this ‘democratic’ era came into being: 2 ‘The Constitution is Natural Justice Writ Large’ ‘It is no accident that constitutions usually come into being as a result of bad rather than good experiences. Their text, or sub-text, is almost invariably: “never again”. In the case of South Africa, the new constitution arises out of the need to escape from the profound humiliations and oppression created by apartheid. Through the constitution, we affirm that we learn something from our dolorous history. It is worth repeating: all constitutions are based on mistrust. If we could trust our rulers, our parties, ourselves, we would not need constitutions. Power not only corrupts, it intoxicates, it confuses. Like Nature, it abhors a vacuum. Like Water, it follows the path of least resistance. Oppression is oppression, but in some ways, oppression in the name of the good is worse than oppression in defence of the bad, since it tarnishes the very ideas it seeks to protect and deprives people even of the image or hope of a better society.’ [‘The Constitution is Natural Justice Writ Large’ in Corder and McLennan (eds) Controlling Public Power: Administrative Justice Through Law Cape Town, Department of Public Law, University of Cape Town: 1995, 51, 51. 1.] Be Pleased To Take Notice That we expressly wish to clarify from the outset that this is a clear case of subject matter jurisdiction as per the following precedent: 2.] SUPREME COURT RULING – NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54) 3.] And, whereas we expressly wish that this herein Affidavit and all related communications with the Constitutional Court and all similar jurisdiction courts are executed outside the Republic for use within the Republic in accordance with rule 63 of the High Courts and that the under-signed have waivered their right to recognition as a person as defined in the Interpretation Act. 4.] And, whereas we wish to start with a summary brief and conclusion so that our wishes and intent remains clear and not lost in the translation; “A few men live by reason, most live by experience, the remainder live by necessity, and the animals live by nature.” - Cicero 5.] We say that based on our first-hand experiences with the people acting on behalf of the courts and banks and agencies of government of Southern Africa and based on the Annexures provided at http://giftoftruth.wordpress.com/annexures/ 3 6.] And, based on all further information researched and posted on the relevant giftoftruth.wordpress.com pages and all links named therein, all the aforementioned we believe to constitute sufficient and substantive proof of our herein-made claims: 7.] Whereas by natural reason in our discovery of the truth to find remedy in the law for we, the people and to be of consensus we hold the following to be true unless proven to be otherwise, In which case we will humbly withdraw our charges and claims and amend our ways: 8.] Summary brief of claims: 9.] Whereas we say that based on our findings we, the people have reason to believe that: i) We have no more lawful original Republican government by common-law definition; instead we are being governed by what can only be described as FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC CORPORATE LAW MERCHANT FRANCHISES; ii) The REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, SOUTH AFRICA, PARLIAMENT and all derivatives thereof are conformed companies, hereinafter RSA INC. iii) The FEDERAL BANKs are now ALL privately owned by a global cartel that hijacked the banking system in stages over the last 200 years; iv) Our SOUTH AFRICAN RESERVE BANK was finally ‘re-venued’ in 1994; v) The REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA was ‘re-venued’ in 1995 and subsequently ALL REGISTERED ENTITIES; vi) MONEY and PROMISSORY NOTES are merely IOUs; vii) INVOICES, REMITTANCES, ORDERS, WARRANTS are credit instruments; viii) People acting as AGENTS refuse to honour financial remedy by their own rules such as the Bills of Exchange Act; ix) We, the people have been turned from living creditors and equal shareholders into STRAWMAN SECURED PARTY DEBTORs; x) The CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA was ‘re- venued’ and PUBLISHED in 1996 without informing the people of the legal consequences; xi) SOCIAL INSURANCE was ’re-venued’ by 2004; 4 xii) SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICES was finally ‘re-venued’ in 2009 hence REVENUE STAMP has now fallen away ab 2009; xiii) The major RSA BANKS are the ‘MANAGERS’ of this CORPORATION; xiv) The BANKS create money out of thin air using our SIGNATURES; xv) The COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA are FRANCHISES too; xvi) The COURTS ENGAGE IN COMMERCE using ORDER and WARRANT and BILL as BILLS OF EXCHANGE or negotiable instruments; xvii) Our Peace Officers and Military are led to believe that RSA xviii) The COURT and JUSTICE and BANK and SHERIFF and LAW ENFORCEMENT all work hand-in-hand and cannot be separated as within this structure syndicated piracy and barratry against the people is rife; xix) These FRANCHISEs has been operating under ADMIRALTY revolving bankruptcy law Since the Insolvency Act of 1917; xx) We, the living souls are held hostage as the collateral, surety and human capital in this encroaching global corporate assimilation of our very souls; xxi) To ensure this, the government is enforcing birth certificates on we, the people; right now, anyone who refuses to ‘register’ their child is threatened with removal of their ancestor/offspring, again using semantic deceit; xxii) All contracts are based upon a fraudulent contract called the BIRTH CERTIFIATE which was ‘re-venued’ as a FRANCHISE and ASSET of RSA INC. on the stock exchanges; xxiii) We, as living souls are being re-venued and press-ganged from living jurisdiction into the fiction law of the sea through the use of semantic deceit; xxiv) Voting fraud is rampant as we are not informed of the legal consequences of voting and the INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION has since 2014 removed the right to remove one’s LEGAL FICTION from the VOTERS ROLL; xxv) The same global elite who control our money supply control and own the media, education, sciences, military, everything and fomenting a plot to instigate WW III and thereby destroy the very fabric of society; xxvi) Our very own people acting in positions of power are co-conspirators, either knowingly or un-knowingly; however, once noticed there is no more plausible deniability by anyone who has been educated from here on forth; 5 xxvii) Mankind is easily susceptible to propaganda and conditioning and in this way is being dumbed down to believe the lies so as to deceitfully abrogate all their rights; xxviii) All herein creates an illusion of consent; xxix) We say that we do not consent to any of it; xxx) The actions of the people acting as AGENT is tantamount to slavery and must be averted at all costs; we are in a state of emergency; xxxi) We, the people hereby expressly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report FY17-18
    2017/18 The Rhodes Trust Second Century Annual Report 2017/18 Trustees 2017/18 Sir John Hood KNZM, Chairman Professor Margaret Professor Ngaire Woods CBE (New Zealand & Worcester 1976) MacMillan CH, CC (New Zealand & Balliol 1987) Andrew Banks Dr Tariro Makadzange John Wylie AM (Florida & St Edmund Hall 1976) (Zimbabwe & Balliol 1999) (Queensland & Balliol 1983) Dominic Barton Michael McCaffery (British Columbia & Brasenose 1984) (Pennsylvania & Merton 1975) New Trustees 2018 Professor Sir John Bell GBE John McCall MacBain O.C. Robert Sternfels (Alberta & Magdalen 1975) (Québec & Wadham 1980) (California & Worcester 1992) Professor Elleke Boehmer Nicholas Oppenheimer Katherine O’Regan (South Africa-at-Large and St John’s 1985) Professor Dame Carol Robinson DBE Dame Helen Ghosh DCB Trustee Emeritus Dilip Shangvhi Donald J. Gogel Julian Ogilvie Thompson (New Jersey & Balliol 1971) Peter Stamos (Diocesan College, Rondebosch (California & Worcester 1981) & Worcester 1953) Glen James Judge Karen Stevenson (Maryland/DC & Magdalen 1979) Development Committee Andrew Banks, Chairman Bruns Grayson The Hon. Thomas McMillen (Florida & St Edmund Hall 1976) (California & University 1974) (Maryland & University 1974) Nicholas Allard Patrick Haden Timothy Orton (New York & Merton 1974) (California & Worcester 1975) (Australia-at-Large & Magdalen 1986) Dominic Barton Sir John Hood KNZM Lief Rosenblatt (British Columbia & Brasenose 1984) (New Zealand & Worcester 1976) (Massachusetts & Magdalen 1974) Shona L. Brown Sean Mahoney Arthur Scace, CM, QC, LLD (Ontario & New College 1987) (Illinois & New College 1984) (Ontario & Corpus Christi 1961) Gerald J. Cardinale Jacko Maree The Hon. Malcolm Turnbull MP (Pennsylvania & Christ Church 1989) (St Andrews College, Grahamstown (New South Wales & Brasenose 1978) & Pembroke 1978) Sir Roderick Eddington Michele Warman (Western Australia & Lincoln 1974) Michael McCaffery (New York & Magdalen 1982) (Pennsylvania & Merton 1975) Michael Fitzpatrick Charles Conn (Western Australia & St Johns 1975) John McCall MacBain O.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Speculumjuris 2007 Part 1.Pdf
    SPECULUM JURIS VOLUME 21 PART 1 2007 ARTICLES “Law and Transformative Justice in Post-Apartheid South Africa”: A Conference to Celebrate the 90th Anniversary of the University of Fort Hare – by Professor Patrick C Osode......................................... 1 Transformative Adjudication in Post-Apartheid South Africa – Taking Stock after a Decade – by Dikgang Moseneke ..................................................... 2 The Horizontal Application of Human Rights Norms – by Johan Froneman......................................................... 13 Post-1994 Administrative Law in South Africa: The Constitution, the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 and the Common Law – by Clive Plasket.... 25 Towards a Transformative Adjudication of Socio-Economic Rights – by Sandra Liebenberg............... 41 Judges, Politics and the Separation of Powers – by Francois Venter.......................................................... 60 Judicial Review and the Transformation of South African Jurisprudence with Specific Reference to African Customary Law – by D D Ndima ....................................... 75 From “Repugnancy” to “Bill Of Rights”: African Customary Law and Human Rights in Lesotho and South Africa – by Laurence Juma...................................... 88 The Equality Act: Enhancing the Capacity of the Law to Generate Social Change for the Promotion of Gender Equality – by Nomthandazo Ntlama................................... 113 The National Director of Public Prosecutions in South Africa: Independent Boss or Party
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2014 Annual Report
    Faculty of Law 2014 Centre for ANNUAL Faculty of Law Human Rights REPORT 2 The Centre for Human Rights, based at the Faculty of Law, CONTENTS University of Pretoria, is both an academic department and a non- DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE 4 governmental organisation. ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES 6 The Centre was established in the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria, in 1986, as part of domestic efforts against the apartheid system of the time. RESEARCH 8 The Centre for Human Rights works towards human rights education in Africa, a greater awareness of human rights, the wide dissemination of publications on human rights in Africa, and the improvement of the PROJECTS 10 rights of women, people living with HIV, indigenous peoples, sexual minorities and other disadvantaged or marginalised persons or groups across the continent. PUBLICATIONS 31 Over the years, the Centre has positioned itself in an unmatched network of practising and academic lawyers, national and international civil servants and human rights practitioners across the entire continent, with a CENTRE PERSONNEL 33 specific focus on human rights law in Africa, and international development law in general. Today, a wide network of Centre alumni contribute in numerous ways to the advancement and strengthening STAFF ACTIVITES 36 of human rights and democracy all over the Africa continent, and even further afield. FUNDING 40 In 2006, the Centre for Human Rights was awarded the UNESCO Prize for Human Rights Education, with particular recognition for the African Human Rights Moot Court Competition and the LLM in Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa. In 2012, the Centre for Human Rights was awarded the 2012 African Union Human Rights Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrevised Hansard National
    UNREVISED HANSARD NATIONAL ASSEMBLY TUESDAY, 13 JUNE 2017 Page: 1 TUESDAY, 13 JUNE 2017 ____ PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ____ The House met at 14:02. The Speaker took the Chair and requested members to observe a moment of silence for prayer or meditation. MOTION OF CONDOLENCE (The late Ahmed Mohamed Kathrada) The CHIEF WHIP OF THE MAJORITY PARTY: Hon Speaker I move the Draft Resolution printed in my name on the Oder Paper as follows: That the House — UNREVISED HANSARD NATIONAL ASSEMBLY TUESDAY, 13 JUNE 2017 Page: 2 (1) notes with sadness the passing of Isithwalandwe Ahmed Mohamed Kathrada on 28 March 2017, known as uncle Kathy, following a short period of illness; (2) further notes that Uncle Kathy became politically conscious when he was 17 years old and participated in the Passive Resistance Campaign of the South African Indian Congress; and that he was later arrested; (3) remembers that in the 1940‘s, his political activities against the apartheid regime intensified, culminating in his banning in 1954; (4) further remembers that in 1956, our leader, Kathrada was amongst the 156 Treason Trialists together with Nelson Mandela and Walter Sisulu, who were later acquitted; (5) understands that he was banned and placed under a number of house arrests, after which he joined the political underground to continue his political work; UNREVISED HANSARD NATIONAL ASSEMBLY TUESDAY, 13 JUNE 2017 Page: 3 (6) further understands that he was also one of the eight Rivonia Trialists of 1963, after being arrested in a police swoop of the Liliesleaf
    [Show full text]
  • Top Court Trims Executive Power Over Hawks
    Legalbrief | your legal news hub Sunday 26 September 2021 Top court trims executive power over Hawks The Constitutional Court has not only agreed that legislation governing the Hawks does not provide adequate independence for the corruption-busting unit, it has 'deleted' the defective sections, notes Legalbrief. It found parts of the legislation that governs the specialist corruption-busting body unconstitutional, because they did not sufficiently insulate it from potential executive interference. This, notes a Business Day report, is the second time the court has found the legislation governing the Hawks, which replaced the Scorpions, unconstitutional for not being independent enough. The first time, the court sent it back to Parliament to fix. This time the court did the fixing, by cutting out the offending words and sections. The report says the idea behind the surgery on the South African Police Service (SAPS) Act was to ensure it had sufficient structural and operational independence, a constitutional requirement. In a majority judgment, Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng said: 'Our anti-corruption agency is not required to be absolutely independent. It, however, has to be adequately independent. 'And that must be evidenced by both its structural and operational autonomy.' The judgment resolved two cases initially brought separately - one by businessman Hugh Glenister, the other by the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF), notes Business Day. Because both cases challenged the Hawks legislation on the grounds of independence, the two were joined. Glenister's case - that the Hawks could never be independent while located in the SAPS, which was rife with corruption - was rejected by the court.
    [Show full text]
  • JSC Rejects Hlophe Bid for Recusal of Five Members
    Legalbrief | your legal news hub Thursday 30 September 2021 JSC rejects Hlophe bid for recusal of five members The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) will for the first time hold an inquiry that could be the prelude to the impeachment of a judge, after it rejected a request that five of its members should recuse themselves, says a report in the The Sunday Independent. The JSC, which met at the weekend to consider the complaints by the Constitutional Court and Cape Judge President John Hlophe, found that in view of the 'conflict of fact' on papers before it, oral evidence would be required from both sides. The report quotes an unnamed leading senior counsel as saying: 'The inquiry that is going to be held is of huge importance. If this matter is proved, it is difficult to imagine anything more serious.' The request for recusal by counsel for Hlophe was based on concerns that he would not get a fair hearing because last year the five had felt the Judge President should face a gross misconduct inquiry relating to his 'moonlighting' for the Oasis group of companies. At the time, during the Oasis matter, the JSC had been split largely on racial lines, and it was Chief Justice Pius Langa who cast the deciding vote that saw Hlophe escape an inquiry that could have led to his impeachment. According to a report on the News24 site, JSC spokesperson Marumo Moerane said both parties made presentations regarding the future conduct of the matter. He said notice of the date and venue of the oral hearing would be made known once arrangements had been finalised.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the North West Bar Association
    THE BAR IN SA was a circuit court. This led to an arrangement being made between the A brief history of the North West Bar and advocates who were employed Bar Association as lecturers at the Law Faculty of the newly established University of LCJ Maree SC, Mafikeng Transkei in terms of which lecturers were allowed to practise on a part-time basis. Thus in 1978, Don Thompson, Birth and name (Judge-President of the High Court of Bophuthatswana), F Kgomo (Judge­ Brian Leslie, Joe Renene and Selwyn In an old dilapidated minute book, the President of Northern Cape High Court) Miller (presently the Acting Judge following is to be found on the first and Nkabinde, Leeuw and Chulu President of the Transkei Division) all page: 'Ons, die ondergetekendes, stig (deceased) Uudges of the High Court of became members of the Society. hiermee 'n organisasie wat bekend sal Bophuthatswana). A number of our staan as die Balie van Advokate van The membership of the Society grew members have acted as judges in various Bophuthatswana, ook bekend as die steadily during the 1980s. New members divisions and Lever SC has also acted in Balie van Bophuthatswana. Die grond­ included Tholie Madala (a justice of the the High Court of Botswana. Our mem­ wet van die Vereniging is hierby aange­ Constitutional Court from its inception), bers have chaired various commissions heg as Bylae A.' The 'stigtingsakte' as Peter Rowan, Peter Barratt, Joe Miso, during the period when commissions of they called it, was signed by Advocates enquiries were fashionable. Vic Vakalisa (upon his return), Digby JJ Rossouw, TBR Kgalegi and LAYJ Koyana, Nona Goso, Sindi Majokweni, Thomas on 17 March 1981 at Mafikeng.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa
    NYLS Law Review Vols. 22-63 (1976-2019) Volume 60 Issue 1 Twenty Years of South African Constitutionalism: Constitutional Rights, Article 5 Judicial Independence and the Transition to Democracy January 2016 The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa STEPHEN ELLMANN Martin Professor of Law at New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation STEPHEN ELLMANN, The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa, 60 N.Y.L. SCH. L. REV. (2015-2016). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in NYLS Law Review by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@NYLS. NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 Stephen Ellmann The Struggle for the Rule of Law in South Africa 60 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 57 (2015–2016) ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Stephen Ellmann is Martin Professor of Law at New York Law School. The author thanks the other presenters, commentators, and attenders of the “Courts Against Corruption” panel, on November 16, 2014, for their insights. www.nylslawreview.com 57 THE STRUGGLE FOR THE RULE OF LAW IN SOUTH AFRICA NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW VOLUME 60 | 2015/16 I. INTRODUCTION The blight of apartheid was partly its horrendous discrimination, but also its lawlessness. South Africa was lawless in the bluntest sense, as its rulers maintained their power with the help of death squads and torturers.1 But it was also lawless, or at least unlawful, in a broader and more pervasive way: the rule of law did not hold in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judiciary As a Site of the Struggle for Political Power: a South African Perspective
    The judiciary as a site of the struggle for political power: A South African perspective Freddy Mnyongani: [email protected] Department of Jurisprudence, University of South Africa (UNISA) 1. Introduction In any system of government, the judiciary occupies a vulnerable position. While it is itself vulnerable to domination by the ruling party, the judiciary must at all times try to be independent as it executes its task of protecting the weak and vulnerable of any society. History has however shown that in most African countries, the judiciary has on a number of occasions succumbed to the domination of the ruling power. The struggle to stay in power by the ruling elite is waged, among others, in the courts where laws are interpreted and applied by judges who see their role as the maintenance of the status quo. To date, a typical biography of a post-independence liberation leader turned president would make reference to a time spent in jail during the struggle for liberation.1 In the post-independence Sub-Saharan Africa, the situation regarding the role of the judiciary has not changed much. The imprisonment of opposition leaders, especially closer to elections continues to be a common occurrence. If not that, potential opponents are subjected to charges that are nothing but a display of power and might. An additional factor relates to the disputes surrounding election results, which inevitably end up in court. The role of the judiciary in mediating these disputes, which are highly political in nature, becomes crucial. As the tension heats up, the debate regarding the appointment of judges, their ideological background and their independence or lack thereof, become fodder for the media.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Women on South Africa's Courts Make a Difference?
    Do Women on South Africa’s Courts Make a Difference? Do Women on South Africa’s Courts Make a Difference? *By Ruth B. Cowan Research assistance provided by Colleen Normile Women’s presence on the bench in South Africa began in 1994 with the end of apartheid. As Justice Yvonne Mokgoro observes in the documentary Courting Justice, during the hundreds of preceding years “ I guess there was no thought that women could also serve.” More accurately, what kept women off the bench were the thoughts that women , unsuited by nature, could never serve. The post apartheid Constitution, setting forth a human rights- based constitutional democracy, dismissed these notions and mandated the consideration of women when making judicial appointments. The appointments were to be made to what was now to be an independent judiciary. The apartheid judiciary had not been independent—its charge was to assure the validation of apartheid’s legislation, executive regulations and official actions. Yet, these courts were to be retained, as were the judges and court personnel whose record was hostile to the very human rights which the judiciary was now charged to protect. The Constitution did create one new court ; i.e., the Constitutional Court . It was charged with and limited to considering cases in which constitutional issues were raised. Given the continued engagement of the apartheid judges --all but two of whom were white males and almost all of whom were energetic in support of apartheid’s oppressive and repressive laws and brutal actions, the transformation of the judiciary by race and gender was and continues to be verbally embraced as a high priority.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadres Running Scared
    PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 6 FINANCE// GLOBAL CITIZEN// LIGHT// THE FAMOUS LIVING THE LIFE RUGBY: it’S KICK- BRANDS JOURNEY IN LISBON OFF TIME, FINALLY BizTHE RATIONAL PERSPECTIVENewsDigest WWW.BIZNEWS.COM FRIDAY 09 OCTOBER 2020 BIZNEWSCOM Cadres running scared BRIEFS Business Long-suffering South Africans, even those more cynically inclined, have reason to celebrate Arrest Confidence Index October, now that the National Prosecution Authority is finally cracking the whip. At last count, 17 suspects had been rounded up with more arrests on the cards under the rejuvenated leadership of the 85.7 NPA, and nourished by the flow of evidence at the Zondo Commission into State Capture. It’s early September 2020 days, but a tangible momentum shift is undeniable, that the corrupt elite’s days of reckoning are coming. The likes of serially-implicated ANC secretary general Ace Magashule and former minister Nomvula Mokonyane, among others, must know it’s not if, but when the Hawks put on the cuffs and R640m take them for a drive. – Derek Alberts Sanral shortfall to date By Claire Badenhorst Ace quivering The Free State asbestos project that lead to the arrest of seven Afrimat he State Capture suspects, including fast-living interim headline Commission has heard tenderpreneur Edwin Sodi, cast earnings per share from key witnesses about even more aspersions on deeply Thow several meetings were held implicated ANC secretary general with former president Jacob Ace Magashule. 0-5% Zuma, his close friend Dudu He is said to be feeling the pressure Myeni, and Eskom executives though, so much so that he sought in 2015.
    [Show full text]