DOCSLIB.ORG

Magazine1-4 Final.Qxd (Page 3)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magazine1-4 Final.Qxd (Page 3) SUNDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2019 (PAGE 4) ACCESSION ACTORS Shiban Khaibri Sheikh Abdullah preaching non-violence and amity but Sheikh Abdullah whom he had all praises for, was imprisoned when Gandhi visited .Immediately after Gandhi On October 26, at Nehru's residence, History should not become subservient to distortions, meeting the Maharaja, Prime Minister Ram Chand Kak was dismissed. the exemplary role played by Sheikh manipulations and layers of opaqueness in addition to Abdullah to shape the future of Kashmir Gopalaswami Ayyangar hiding of or bypassing important events and the role is worth mentioning. Kabaylies or He was the Prime Minister of Jammu and of various types of noted personalities. We want history Raiders supported by Pakistani regulars Kashmir for 6 years right from 1937 to 1943. He is had almost reached outskirts of Srinagar, believed to have played a notable role in the state's - correct, factual and sans distortions, history based on ready to capture the airport and Srinagar accession to the fledging union of India as he knew ascertained facts and no manipulations or any cherry when Prime Minister Meher Chand each and every nerve of the state . He was elected picking but opening up hidden and suppressed topics to Mahajan threatened Nehru to 'make it to the Constituent Assembly of India in December fast' , accept accession papers and send 1946 and was appointed to the 13 member Drafting have a broader perspective of historical events which the army coupled with giving whatever powers needed, to Sheikh Abdullah, fail- Committee that formulated the constitution of younger generations must get to know without any ifs ing which he would negotiate the terms with Jinnah as the city must be saved India .After State's accession he was Union . Angered by Mahajan's threat , Nehru asked Mahajan to "go away". Patel Minister looking after Kashmir Affairs , while and buts. With that prelude , let it be said that state's whispered in the ear of Mahajan , "Of course, you are not going to Pakistan." Nehru held the overall charge of Kashmir which accession is hard won , it is a historical festival and not Mahajan stood up to leave and in the meantime, Sheikh Abdullah who was caused ripples in his relations with Patel who overhearing the talks, sensing the gravity of the situation, sent a slip of paper should have been looking after Kashmir as well being the Home Minister, it an ordinary day which we must celebrate with devotion, to Nehru, after reading which his attitude changed completely and he called was Ayyangar who stepped into the shoes of Patel and drew nearer to Nehru. remembering splendid role played by great leaders and Mahajan back and the 'deal' clicked. This has been thrown light upon by It is he, who later, on insistence of Nehru under pressure from Sheikh our heroes of battles who fought invasion of Pakistan. Mahajan himself in a book "Looking Back" written by him. Abdullah, drafted Article 370 giving (temporary) special status to Jammu Sardar Patel and Kashmir but only on August 5 this year , that was constitutionally is a travesty that the Day of Accession is not a holiday in revoked and Article 370 rendered inoperative. Sardar Patel too played a key role in seeing that Kashmir sealed its fate Jammu and Kashmir, July 13 is instead. with the fledging Union of independ- Maqbool Sherwani ent India. He was in constant touch A dedicated activist of National Conference and Sheikh Abdullah, a 19 M.S.Golwalker with Maharaja Hari Singh as also suc- year old Mohd. Maqbool Sherwani was the one who cessive Prime Ministers of the state. At the outset, let it unequivocally be stated that forced Mohd. Ali Jinnah to stop his address in That was precisely to ensure that the those 'liberal, democratic and secular' politicians Baramulla when he spoke about two nation theory . He Ruler's decision remained in India's frustrated the advance of thousands of savages by mis- and writers who take pride in criticising the RSS favour. Much before the catastrophe leading them about the route to Srinagar thus giving day in and day out to the extent of deriding it and of the treacherous Pakistani diaboli- Indian Army valuable time to land in Srinagar. Tied to a chorusing the manufactured "link" the organisa- cal move of attacking Jammu and wooden post , pasted "I am traitor" on forehead, 15 bul- tion had in the assassination of Gandhi Ji , have Kashmir by proxy, on July 3, he wrote lets were pumped into his body by the ruthless never brought in limelight the role of RSS to the Maharaja that in joining India Kabalyees. He remains an unsung hero for the govern- Sarsanghchalak M.S. Golwalkar affectionately only, interests of Kashmir were in ment and for many people he is a "traitor". called as Guru Ji in the state's accession with safe hands, secured and protected. India. Instead, pride is taken in giving all credit to He attempted to allay Maharaja's Brig. Rajinder Singh Jawarlal Nehru for "handling" Kashmir issue when apprehensions about Congress, in A saga of valour, bravery and devotion , the first in fact, he committed Himalayan errors in the whole issue. In fact, since particular Nehru's relations with recipient of Maha Vir Chakra in independent India some events of true national history are now unfolding progressively , it is Sheikh Abdullah. However, unfortu- has earned the title of 'saviour of Kashmir' who deduced that had Nehru not interfered with it, the Kashmir issue would have nately Maharaja sent a "Stand Still fought the swarm of raiders "to the last man and been all over after Pakistan attacked it in 1947-48. Agreement" on August 12 to the union the last bullet" in unparalleled way of bravery and Sardar Patel in kashmir, November 1947, with of India in response to which Patel Following declaration of the British government's deadline of June3, 1947 Bakshi Ghulam Mohammed standing), Sheikh patriotism. Maj.Som Nath Sharma ,recipient of Abdullah and Manibehn asked him to send a representative for Param Vir Chakra , played a unique role and for the princely rulers of India to join either India or Pakistan, it had met discussions and clarifications which with an undecided option in Jammu and Kashmir which soon was felt as demonstrated superb bravery and dedication to did not happen. Curiously, Pakistan cunningly accepted it immediately after duty and defended the airport and the city of serious challenge to the freedom and the integrity of the independent India, the Maharaja sent the same to them. Sardar Patel had deputed Golwalkar to lead a political mission to Srinagar Srinagar making it operational. Many brave and patriotic souls contributed in one way or the other to meet the Maharaja and his key role played in the accession of the state Lord Mountbatten in making the day of accession with India a reality with the union of India after independence and the Maharaja getting In fact, he can be counted among the first per- sons to touch the issue of future of Jammu and historically , legally and constitutionally to whom we are inclined towards acceding to India , cannot be ignored at all. These revela- always grateful. tions have been made in details by a senior bureaucrat Arun Bhatnagar hav- Kashmir with the Maharaja on June3, 1947 imme- diately after the partition plan was made public . He ing been a close aide of Smt. Sonia Gandhi, in his book "India shedding the even visited Srinagar and camped for 3 days (June RC KAK Past, Embracing the Future 1906-2017". Bhatnagar was running her pet 19 to 23 1947). Maharaja is said to have avoided him R C Kak was the prime minister of Maharaja Hari project National Advisory Council, and also headed Prasar Bharti Board dur- as he was reportedly toeing with the idea of opting Singh's regime who had given the concept of ing UPA era. for the third choice which Mountbatten was not in Independent Kashmir keeping in view the changing Very few know that Golwalkar had reached Srinagar on Oct 17, 1947 to favour of. political scenario at that time attend a meeting which state Prime Minister Meher Chand Mahajan had arranged between the Maharaja and Golwalkar which proved not only Mahatma Gandhi Mehar Chand Mahajan effective but very successful too. The Maharaja was inclined to the signing of He paid a 4 days visit , a historical and the fist On the day Hari Singh signed the Instrument of the Instrument of Accession to India which Golwalkar reported back to and the last one to Srinagar in early August 1947. Accession with India on October 26, 1947, Mahajan Sardar Patel . However, it was only when Kashmir came under savage attack The visit was the outcome of a meeting at Birla from Pakistani irregulars fully backed by its army and the devastation and House Delhi convened by Nehru , Patel, was the Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir mayhem created by the savages that forced Hari Singh's hand to take the Mountbatten and Gandhi himself where it was appointed by Hari Singh on the request of Sardar plunge . After a period of one week only, the Maharaja actually signed the decided that Gandhi Ji would visit Srinagar and Patel in May 1947. He was also the Indian National Instrument of Accession with the Indian Union. Why such a fact about the meet the Maharaja for the "job". He stayed at Congress-appointed member of the Radcliffe accession saga of Jammu and Kashmir has not been highlighted in public Barzulla in a private house and not in the Royal Commission, which was set up to demarcate the domain is baffling, if not intriguing.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I. Foundation of Jammu and Kashmir State
    I. Foundation of Jammu and Kashmir State The State of Jammu and Kashmir known for its extravagant natural beauty is the northernmost State of the Indian Union. It can be aptly described by famous farsi; couplet of Hazrat Amir Khusrau which states: Agar firdaus bar roo-e zameen ast, Hameen ast – o hameen ast – o hameen ast. It means if there is a paradise on earth it is this, it is this, it is this. Jammu and Kashmir which occupies an extremely strategic position on the Indian frontiers, is the only State in the Indian Union with a Muslim majority. It shares international with Russia, Afghanistan, Pakistan and China. It is bounded on the south by Himachal Pradesh and the Punjab, on the north by Chinese Turkistan and a little of Russian Turkistan, and on the east by Chinese Tibet. On the west lies Pakistan and to the northwest, Afghanistan. Causes for the foundation -In 1846 Kashmir experienced a unique development with enduring consequences. The development was that three distinctive political, geographical and cultural entities i.e. Kashmir valley, Jammu and ladakh were merged into one political entity. At no stage in the history of the state, the three regions formed a single political entity. It was only Kashmir which claim the position of an empire and on the contrary Jammu & Ladakh were small states each under a local ruler or tributaries of powerful rulers emerged either in Kashmir or elsewhere in neighborhood. On the eve of 1846, Kashmir, Jammu as well as Ladakh were under the control of Lahore Darbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Ending the Raj
    0 BACKGROUND GUIDE: ENDING THE RAJ 1 BACKGROUND GUIDE: ENDING THE RAJ Greetings from the Director, Hello and welcome to UTMUN 2018! My name is Shanzae Khan and I will be your Director for ‘Ending the Raj.’ As this is a crisis committee, we have a highly skilled crisis team working with us. The Crisis Manager for this committee is Jennifer Ben, our Moderator is Roaa Shoukry and the Crisis Analysts are Laura Quon, Maya Li Preti, Akil Abrar and Aniket Ka. We have been working very hard over the past few months to bring you this committee and will be present during the conference to answer any queries you may have. I have been involved with Model United Nations (MUNs) for over nine years and this is one of the most interesting committees that I have been given the opportunity to be a part of. I have participated as a Delegate, Vice-Chair, Co-Director, Director and have recently endeavored towards the logistical aspect of MUNs by serving as Director General for Internal Affairs at a recent conference. Diplomacy and debates are one of the most interesting aspects within this committee, and I hope to help you all with any and all aspects of debate you encounter during the course of this conference. Due to the competitive nature of UTMUN, I would strongly advise you all to read this background guide, submit your position papers on time, and conduct the relevant research required for your character. This will not only help you with your debating and diplomacy skills, but will also ensure that you all have a fun and memorable time within the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Impasse at the United Nations
    01-0290-0 ch1.qxd 3/15/09 10:58 AM Page 9 1 Impasse at the United Nations Before the 1947 partition of India, few Americans knew or cared about the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Tucked away in the high western Himalayas, Kashmir, as it was commonly called, was an amalgam of territories widely varied in language, culture, religion, ethnicity, and eco- nomic development. Its disparate regions had been cobbled together by the dynastic ambitions of the state’s rulers abetted by British imperial design. In the first half of the nineteenth century, these maharajas, Hindus of the Dogra ethnic group based in the Jammu area of the state, had with British backing created one of the largest states in Britain’s Indian empire. Situated along India’s border with China, touching Afghanistan, and close to the Central Asian regions of Czarist Russia and, later, the Soviet Union, it was also one of the most strategically placed. What little American interest there was in Kashmir before rival Indian and Pakistani claims brought the state to international attention in late 1947 was confined to occasional private visitors. A handful of traders came to the state to purchase carpets, papier mâché, and other handicrafts for export to the U.S. market. American missionary activity was limited; the state was the preserve of mainly British church groups. A few American tourists interested in exotic places and wealthy enough to get to them visited the state. During World War II, U.S. servicemen operating in the China-Burma-India theater went to Kashmir on leave to lounge on houseboats and get away from the heat and dust of the Indian plains.
    [Show full text]
  • In Depth: Jammu and Kashmir
    In Depth: Jammu and Kashmir drishtiias.com/printpdf/in-depth-jammu-and-kashmir https://youtu.be/nP_Lj24SwFM Both Article 370 and Article 35A have been subject matters of debates for several years. They've been continuously challenged in the Supreme Court on grounds of being unconstitutional and violating the basic structure of the Indian Constitution. The debate has once again gained ground with National Conference leader and former J&K CM Omar Abdullah calling for a separate PM for J&K. History of J&K The first formal document of Kashmir came out through Kalhana’s Rajatarangini. Both Hindus and Muslims had ruled Kashmir time to time before independence. During Ranjit Singh’s rule, even Sikhs also governed this area. In 1822, Gulab Singh became the King. Ranbir Singh came to power after the death of 1/4 Gulab Singh in 1857. Hari Singh took the charge of state in 1925. He was the king of Kashmir when the treaty was signed with India. Accession of J&K to India Jammu and Kashmir was one among the 565 princely states of India on which the British paramountcy lapsed at the stroke of midnight on 15th August 1947 under the Partition Plan provided by the Indian Independence Act. The rulers of princely states were given an option to join either India or Pakistan. The ruler of Kashmir Maharaja Hari Singh did not exercise the option immediately. He instead offered a proposal of standstill agreement to both India and Pakistan, pending the final decision on the state’s accession. Pakistan entered into the standstill agreement but it invaded the Kashmir from north with an army of soldiers and tribesmen carrying modern weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Jammu and Kashmir (Princely State) Was Created with the Signing of the Treaty of Amritsar Between the British East India Company and Raja Gulab Singh of Jammu
    1846: Jammu and Kashmir (princely state) was created with the signing of the Treaty of Amritsar between the British East India company and Raja Gulab Singh of Jammu. - Gulab Singh, a Hindu king already ruled over Jammu and Ladakh - The British East India Company defeated the Sikhs and wanted compensation of Rs. &7.5 million - The Sikhs could not pay. - Gulab Singh did and got the Kashmir valley in return - Gulab Singh accepted overall British sovereignty 1947: End of British rule – creation of India & Pakistan - Indian leaders & Viceroy Mountbatten did not want a divided India - Zinnah did – he was afraid Muslims would not get fair treatment - Indian leaders excepting Gandhi finally caved - Rulers of three princely States, Hyderabad, Junagadh and Kashmir asked to choose between India and Pakistan - Maharaja Hari Singh of Kashmir dithered - Pakistan, sensing opportunity, attacked with a tribal army - Hari Singh asked for Indian help and acceded to India 1948: Matter referred to the Security Council - Security Council recommended referendum and troop withdrawal - Pakistan refused to withdraw troops 1951: Elections in Indian-administered area backed accession to India - India: Referendum unnecessary - Pakistan: Referendum has to be over entire area 1953: State Govt. of Jammu & Kashmir ratified accession to India 1950s: China gradually occupied eastern Kashmir (Aksai Chin) 1962: India lost war to regain Aksai Chin 1963: Pakistan ceded Trans Karakorum tract to China 1965: Second India-Pakistan war 1971-72: Third India-Pakistan war – creation of Bangladesh 1987 to 2020 – This period is marked by a) Repeated infiltrations by Pakistan-trained and armed fighters launching terrorist attacks and inciting uprisings b) At times heavy handed response by Indian armed forces c) Movements by some Kashmiris for autonomy 2019 August - Indian government stripped Jammu and Kashmir state of the special status that gave it significant autonomy under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Jammu and Kashmir
    Jammu and Kashmir Jammu and Kashmir, commonly known as Kashmir, territory in the north-western part of the Indian subcontinent bounded on the north-west by Afghanistan, on the north-east by China, on the south by the Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab, and on the west by the North-West Frontier and Punjab provinces of Pakistan. Kashmir has an area of about 222,236 sq km (85,806 sq mi). Both India and Pakistan claim all of Kashmir, but the territory has been partitioned between them since 1947. India controls the southern half of Kashmir, which it has organized as the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Before India's defeat in the 1962 Sino-Indian War, the state of Jammu and Kashmir also included the north-eastern section of the territory, which India still claims as part of Jammu and Kashmir State, but which has since been occupied by China as Aksai Chin. Pakistan controls the northern and western portion of Kashmir which is organized into three main regions: Azad (Free) Kashmir, occupying the crescent of land on the western border of Kashmir, between the state of Jammu and Kashmir on the east and Pakistan on the west; and Gilgit and Baltistan (the Northern Areas) located in the Karakorum Range in the far north-west. Azad Kashmir has a government protected and financed by Pakistan; Gilgit and Baltistan are notionally autonomous, but in practice are administered by political agents of the Pakistani government. The capital of the state of Jammu and Kashmir is Srinagar. The administrative centre of Azad Kashmir is Muzaffarabad; Gilgit town and Skardu are respectively the capitals of Gilgit and Baltistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Geopolitics of Northern Areas
    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online): 2319 – 7722, ISSN (Print): 2319 – 7714 www.ijhssi.org Volume 2 Issue 5 ǁ May. 2013ǁ PP.48-56 Geopolitical Significance of Gilgit Baltistan of J & K State a b Saroj Saini Dr Shaheen Showkat Dar ABSTRACT: Gilgit-Baltistan, previously known as the Northern Areas, is part of a disputed state of Jammu and Kashmir, which has been divided between India and Pakistan since their independence in 1947. The Kashmir dispute has remained a major catalyst of militarization, open and protracted wars, extremism, and underdevelopment in South Asia. Situated in the mountains of northern Pakistan, Gilgit-Baltistan has a strategic importance because of its geopolitical dimensions. Geopolitically, Gilgit-Baltistan is located at the junction of China, Central -South Asia, and the ancient silk route, famous for trade in Central Asia crossed through this region. Its geography also makes it vulnerable to spread out conflicts from active militant movements in surrounding areas. Keeping in view these dimensions, this paper will illustrate the geo-political dimensions of Northern Areas of State of Jammu and Kashmir. The region here signifies the undivided Jammu and Kashmir before partition i.e. 1947A.D. and the surrounding areas encompassing India, Pakistan, Tibet and China. Therefore, the main focus of this paper is to explain the strategic significance of NA, also called Gilgit-Baltistan for India, Pakistan and China. This region also effects peace and security in South Asia. The geo-political significance of Northern Areas for India is because of the reason that NA is an integral part of Princely State of Jammu and Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • Geo-Political Significance of Kashmir: an Overview of Indo-Pak Relations
    IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 9, Issue 2 (Mar. - Apr. 2013), PP 115-123 e-ISSN: 2279-0837, p-ISSN: 2279-0845. www.Iosrjournals.Org Geo-political Significance of Kashmir: An overview of Indo-Pak Relations Naseer Ahmed Kalis* Shaheen Showkat Dar** * Naseer Ahmed Kalis, Junior Research Fellow in the Department of Strategic and Regional Studies University of Jammu.18006. (J&K) ** Shaheen Showkat Dar, Assistant Professor in the Department of Strategic and Regional Studies University of Jammu. 180006. (J&K) Abstract: Geopolitical significance is an important aspect of relation between states which have common borders. In case of India and Pakistan, geopolitical deliberations owe their significance to the very act of partition of India into two independent states and Kashmir as a disputed and divided territory between them. In this context, this paper will analyse the geo-political significance of Kashmir for India and Pakistan. There are strong evidences in the scholarly literature that the two states are creating an atmosphere of chaos, hostility and their citizens are battling with insecurities of poverty, illiteracy and underdevelopment. The duo states are acting as oppressor in Kashmir where thousands of people has been died and left their homes due to Indo-Pak hostility. The panorama of peace and human rights from last 24 years is in murky. Therefore, the geo-political, significance of Kashmir has put India and Pakistan on formidable wars from the last 65 years. The root cause of instability and hostility revolves around Kashmir, a landlocked territory, a bone of confrontation and a contributory cause of Indo- Pak hostility from the day one of their independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Kashmir Conflict
    K a s h mi r C o n f l i c t : A S t u d y o f W h a t L e d t o t h e I n s u r g e n c y i n K a s h m i r V a l l e y & P r o p o s e d F u t u r e S o l u t i o n s By P r iy an k a Bak ay a and S u meet Bh at t i 1 Introduction Throughout ancient times, the breathtakingly beautiful Valley of Kashmir has stood for peaceful contemplation, intellectual advancement and religious diversity co- existing in an atmosphere of tolerance for the most part. In the modern geopolitical era, this same diversity, evident from the blend of Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism in this single state, has made it a center of warfare rather than cultural advancement. In the late 1980s, an insurgency in the valley threatened not only to rip Kashmir apart, but also pull the rest of the world into a dangerous war. In this paper, we will examine the major reasons for the insurgency, and why it only gained momentum some 40 years after India’s partition. Finally, we will explore some of the modern-day proposed solutions to the ongoing conflict over Kashmir. In order to gain a better understanding of why the insurgency of 1987-89 took place, we will examine the origins and development of the Kashmir independence movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine-2-3 Final-1.Qxd (Page 3)
    SUNDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2019 (PAGE 3) Suman K Sharma o paraphrase a proverb, the event of Accession had cast a long shadow before it actually happened. On 15 August, T1947, the Indian Independence Act, 1947, caused the set- THOSE 70 DAYS OF ting up of the independent Dominions of India and Pakistan. On 26 October of that year, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instru- ment of Accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India. The inter- vening 70 days tell a sordid tale of how Pakistan, a country PAK’S MACHINATIONS avowedly found for the Muslim cause, schemed to perpetrate unending bloodshed in this Muslim majority state of ours. After the winding up of the British Raj, Maharaja Hari Singh had, like all other ruling princes of the larger states, options before him either to join the Indian Union or merge with Pak- istan.He could have also perhaps thought of being a sovereign king of his domain. The 52-year old monarch, who had been rul- ing Jammu and Kashmir for the last 22 years, mulled over the problem for what seemed a long time during those turbulent days. Joining India would mean that the Muslim majority of his being led and carried out by non-State personnel. The entire force of domain won't be happy. If he acceded to Pakistan, Hindus and over 20,000 fighting men, armed and equipped by the army and pro- Sikh subjects would be insecure. Choosing to be independent did vided logistic support by civilian authorities of Pakistan, was com- not seem a pleasant prospective either.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Transformation of Pakistan Under Kashmir Dispute
    Social Transformations in Contemporary Society, 2019 (7) ISSN 2345-0126 (online) SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION OF PAKISTAN UNDER KASHMIR DISPUTE Sohaib Mukhtar National University of Malaysia, Malaysia [email protected] Abstract Kashmir dispute is the most important issue between India and Pakistan as they have fought three major wars and two conflicts since 1947. Kashmir dispute arose when British India was separated into Pakistan and India on 15th August 1947 under Indian Independence Act 1947. Independent Indian States could accede either to Pakistan or India as on 26th October 1947, Hari Singh signed treaty of accession with Indian Government while the Governor General of India Mountbatten remarked that after clearance from insurgency, plebiscite would take place in the state and people of Kashmir would decide either to go with Pakistan or India. During war of Kashmir in 1947, India went to the United Nations (UN) and asked for mediation. The UN passed resolution on 20th January 1948 to assist peaceful resolution of Kashmir dispute as another resolution was passed on 21st April 1948 for organization of plebiscite in Kashmir. India holds 43% of the region, Pakistan holds 37% and remaining 19% area is controlled by China. Dispute of Kashmir is required to be resolved through mediation under UN resolutions. Purpose – This research is an analysis of Kashmir dispute under the light of historical perspective, law passed by British Parliament and UN resolutions to clarify Kashmir dispute and recommend its solution under the light of UN resolutions. Design/methodology/approach – This study is routed in qualitative method of research to analyze Kashmir dispute under the light of relevant laws passed by British Parliament, historical perspective, and resolutions passed by the UN.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Historical and Cultural Importance of Kashmir
    Extremism, Violence and Jihad 1 The Government: Research Journal of Political Science Supplementary Edition Vol. III ANALYSIS OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL IMPORTANCE OF KASHMIR Ghulam Akbar Mahesar* Dr. Shuja Ahmed Mahesar** Ghulam Mustafa Gaho*** Ms. Fehmida Aslam**** Abstract This article is focused on the historical and cultural significance of the issue of Kashmir. The first part of the article justifies strategic importance of the Kashmir region and gives an overview of its geography, economy and social structure. In addition it also gives brief account of population trends in the Kashmir. The second part of the paper analyses the status of Kashmir as a princely state before the establishment of colonial rule in India and it discusses political change in the Kashmir during the British period. The third part of the paper examines the issue during the post-partition period. It is argued in the paper that the issue of the problem was an outcome of the unjust partition of British India. The state of Jammmu and Kashmir was supposed to join Pakistan according to the principles of the Partition plan. Nevertheless, the violation of the principles in the distribution of territories between India and Pakistan gave India a passage to the Kashmir valley. Thus, India was able to claim over Kashmir was as its constituent part. Key words: Colonial history, Culture, Geopolitics, Partition Plan, British Policy 1.1 Geostrategic Significance of Kashmir The total area of the State of Jammu and Kashmir is about 84, 471 square miles, according to 1941 census, the population of Jammu and Kashmir State was 4, 21, 616, majority 77.11 % were Muslims, 20.12 % Hindus and 1.64 % were Sikhs.
    [Show full text]