DOCSLIB.ORG

Kickback (“Redwood”) and Exclusion Blackwood Conventions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kickback (“Redwood”) and Exclusion Blackwood Conventions The “Kickback” (“Redwood”) Convention When a Slam in suits other than Spades is contemplaed, the use of the standard “Blackwood” (“4-NT”) asking bid to determine whether or not a potential Slam is feasible does not always work. In some instances the reponse signifying the numbers of Aces or Key-cards present takes the bidding beyond the 5-level of the agreed-upon suit such that the Partnership is inadvertantly propelled into an unmakeable 6-level contract. For example, if the agreed-upon suit is Clubs, and one asks for Controls by bidding “4-NT”, hoping to find two of the four Aces and/or the King of the agreed-upon suit, and the response begets a “5D” call, showing only 1-control card when using “Roman-Key-Card” (“0314”) responses, the Partnership is now committed to a doomed unmakeable 6C contract, if the asking Partner were seeking two controls. So as to eliminate this potential problem, the “Kickback” Convention is used as an alternative to the standard “Roman Key-Card Blackwood (RKC),” or regular Blackwood conventions, and is used for all four suits. If the Partnership uses this convention, singularly, when seeking only a Minor suit Slam, then this partial form of the “Kickback” Convention is called the “Redwood” Convention. The initiating calls in “Redwood,” are in either of the red suits, “4D” when seeking a possible Club Slam, or “4H” when seeking a possible Diamond Slam. The responses are the same as in RKC, but they are expressed in steps, rather than being “hard-wired” to particular denominations. The step responses in both conventions are the same as in “Roman Key-Card;” i.e., either “0314” or “1430”, but the initiating call is not singularly “4-NT”. Whatever the suit agreed-to by the Partnership, the “asking-bid” is an initiating bid of the next higher-ranking suit at the 4-level. Accordingly, if the agreed-upon Trump suit is Clubs, then the initiating bid is “4D”; if the agreed-upon Trump suit is Diamonds, then the relay bid is “4H”; (these first two responses representing both red suits and, thus, this conventional method is therefore designated as the “Redwood” Convention, instead of Blackwood); and if the agreed-upon Trump suit is Hearts, then the initiating bid is “4S”; and if the agreed-upon Trump suit is Spades, then a “4-NT” initiating bid is used. When all four suits utilize the system it is then designated as the “Kickback” Convention. “4D” Roman Key-Card Blackwood for Clubs – “Kickback” (“Redwood”) “4H” Roman Key-Card Blackwood for Diamonds – “Kickback” (“Redwood”) “4S” Roman Key-Card Blackwood for Hearts – “Kickback” “4-NT” Roman Key-Card Blackwood for Spades – “Kickback” When Clubs is the Agreed-Upon Trump Suit If the agreed Minor suit is Clubs, then the Kickback” (“Redwood”) initiating bid is “4D.” The number of Keycards is shown in a series of four steps. (Using “1430” responses) Opener Responder 1C 3C “4D” “4H” (Showing 1 or 4 keycards) “4S” (Showing 3 or 0 keycards) “4-NT” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards without the Club Queen) “5C” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards with the Club Queen) “5D” (5 of the asking Suit) = 2 or 4 Keycards + Void) Jump in Suit = 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the Suit Bid “5-NT” (showing 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the asking suit) ----------------------------- 1 When Diamonds is the Agreed-Upon Trump Suit If the agreed Minor suit is Diamonds, then the “Kickback” (“Redwood”) initiating bid is “4H.” The number of Keycards is again shown in a series of four steps. (Using “1430” responses) Opener Responder 1D 3D “4H” “4S” (Showing 1 or 4 keycards) “4-NT” (Showing 3 or 0 keycards) “5C” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards without the Diamond Queen) “5D” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards with the Diamond Queen) “5H” (5 of the asking Suit) = 2 or 4 Keycards + Void) Jump in Suit = 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the Suit Bid “5-NT” (showing 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the asking suit) ----------------------------- When Hearts is the Agreed-Upon Trump Suit If the agreed suit is Hearts, then the “Kickback” initiating bid is “4S.” The number of Keycards is again shown in a series of four steps. (Using “1430” responses) Opener Responder 1H 3H “4S” “4-NT” (Showing 1 or 4 keycards) “5C” (Showing 3 or 0 keycards) “5D” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards without the Heart Queen) “5H” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards with the Heart Queen) “5S” (5 of the asking Suit) = 2 or 4 Keycards + Void) Jump in Suit = 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the Suit Bid “5-NT” (showing 1 or 3 keycards + a Void in the asking suit ----------------------------- When Spades is the Agreed-Upon Trump Suit If the agreed suit is Spades, then the “Kickback” initiating bid is “4-NT.” The number of Keycards is again shown in a series of four steps. (Using “1430” responses) Opener Responder 1S 3S “4-NT” “5C” (Showing 1 or 4 keycards) “5D” (Showing 3 or 0 keycards) “5H” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards without the Spade Queen) “5S” (Showing 2 or 5 keycards with the Spade Queen) ----------------------------- 2 Asking for the Trump Queen Note: The Kickback Intervenor relays in the next higher-ranking suit, excluding the Trump suit, in order to ask for the Queen of the Trump suit. The answers as to the presence or absence of the Trump Queen are as follows: a) 5 of the Trump Suit = (No Queen) b) 6 of the Trump Suit = (Queen but no outside King) c) A Suit Bid = (Queen + King of the Suit Bid)) d) “5-NT” = (Queen + 3 Outside Kings) Asking for the Kings As in regular Blackwood, asking for Kings is a try for seven. Doing so, promises that all of the key cards, including the Queen of the Trump suit, are present. However, the King “Ask” is not necessarily 5-NT. It is usually a bid of “5K,” a bid at the 5-level of the Kickback suit. Depending upon Partnership agreement, the responses can be either the number of Kings, or specific Kings. Specific Kings The “Teller” does not show the number of Kings. Rather, he/she bids them “up-the-ladder.” Specific Kings are often the key to a grand Slam. Assuming Hearts are the agreed-upon Trump suit, after “4S,” and Teller’s responses, a bid of “5S” asks for specific Kings. The answers by the “Teller,” Asker’s Partner, are as follows: a) “7H” = “I accept a Grand-Slam. I have either the source of tricks, or substantial extra values.” b) “6C” = The presence of the King of Clubs c) “6D” = The presence of the King of Diamonds, but no King of Clubs d) “6S” = The presence of the King of Spades, but no Minor suit King e) “6H” = No side Kings Number of Kings “King Ask” = 5 of the next higher suit after the Trump Suit. a) 1st Step = (No King) b) 2nd Step = (1 King) c) 3rd Step = (2 Kings) d) 4th Step = (3 Kings) 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acol Bidding Notes
    SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION The following notes are designed to help your understanding of the Acol system of bidding and should be used in conjunction with Crib Sheets 1 to 5 and the Glossary of Terms The crib sheets summarise the bidding in tabular form, whereas these notes provide a fuller explanation of the reasons for making particular bids and bidding strategy. These notes consist of a number of short chapters that have been structured in a logical order to build on the things learnt in the earlier chapters. However, each chapter can be viewed as a mini-lesson on a specific area which can be read in isolation rather than trying to absorb too much information in one go. It should be noted that there is not a single set of definitive Acol ‘rules’. The modern Acol bidding style has developed over the years and different bridge experts recommend slightly different variations based on their personal preferences and playing experience. These notes are based on the methods described in the book The Right Way to Play Bridge by Paul Mendelson, which is available at all good bookshops (and some rubbish ones as well). They feature a ‘Weak No Trump’ throughout and ‘Strong Two’ openings. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ INDEX Section 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Bidding objectives & scoring Chapter 2 Evaluating the strength of your hand Chapter 3 Evaluating the shape of your hand . Section 2 Balanced Hands Chapter 21 1NT opening bid & No Trumps responses Chapter 22 1NT opening bid & suit responses Chapter 23 Opening bids with stronger balanced hands Chapter 24 Supporting responder’s major suit Chapter 25 2NT opening bid & responses Chapter 26 2 Clubs opening bid & responses Chapter 27 No Trumps responses after an opening suit bid Chapter 28 Summary of bidding with Balanced Hands .
    [Show full text]
  • Tt Fall 12 Web.Pub
    VOL. 53 No. 3 FALL 2012 Meet Michigan’s winning mini-Spingold squad Editor’s note: A team of five 20-something Ann Arbor players won the 0-1500 mini- Spingold KO, a multi- day limited national championship, at the summer North Ameri- can Bridge Champion- ships in Philadelphia. A month earlier, they also won the Sunday Winners of the mini-Spingold 0-1500 Swiss Teams at the KO Teams: (front) Jin Hu and Jonathan Fleischmann; (back) Max Glick, Zach- Toledo Regional. ary Scherr and Zachary Wasserman. Here are their stories: Jonathan Fleischmann ter. I'm an attorney less than a year out of law school. I'm 24 years old and live in I started playing in 1999 Bloomfield Hills with my fa- (Continued on page 22) ther, two brothers, and a sis- DON’T FORGET TO VOTE The annual election for MBA Board of Directors will be held during the last four days of the October regional. If you cannot be there on one of those days, you can still vote by complet- ing and sending in an absentee ballot. See page 5. Candi- dates’ pictures and statements appear on pages 6 and 7. Michigan Bridge Association Unit #137 2012 VINCE & JOAN REMEY MOTOR CITY REGIONAL October 8-14, 2012 Site: William Costick Center, 28600 Eleven Mile Road, Farmington Hills MI 48336 (between Inkster and Middlebelt roads) 248-473-1816 Intermediate/Newcomers Schedule (0-299 MP) Single-session Stratified Open Pairs: Tue. through Fri., 1 p.m. & 7 p.m.; Sat., 10 a.m. & 2:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Takes Five
    Friday, July 24, 2009 Volume 81, Number 1 Daily Bulletin Washington, DC 81st Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Hall of Fame takes five Hall of Fame inductee Mark Lair, center, with Mike Passell, left, and Eddie Wold. Sportsman of the Year Peter Boyd with longtime (right) Aileen Osofsky and her son, Alan. partner Steve Robinson. If standing ovations could be converted to masterpoints, three of the five inductees at the Defenders out in top GNT flight Bridge Hall of Fame dinner on Thursday evening The District 14 team captained by Bob sixth, Bill Kent, is from Iowa. would be instant contenders for the Barry Crane Top Balderson, holding a 1-IMP lead against the They knocked out the District 9 squad 500. defending champions with 16 deals to play, won captained by Warren Spector (David Berkowitz, Time after time, members of the audience were the fourth quarter 50-9 to advance to the round of Larry Cohen, Mike Becker, Jeff Meckstroth and on their feet, applauding a sterling new class for the eight in the Grand National Teams Championship Eric Rodwell). The team was seeking a third ACBL Hall of Fame. Enjoying the accolades were: Flight. straight win in the event. • Mark Lair, many-time North American champion Five of the six team members are from All four flights of the GNT – including Flights and one of ACBL’s top players. Minnesota – Bob and Cynthia Balderson, Peggy A, B and C – will play the round of eight today. • Aileen Osofsky, ACBL Goodwill chair for nearly Kaplan, Carol Miner and Paul Meerschaert.
    [Show full text]
  • Alastair White & Norman Lazonby 2-Over-1, Weak No-Trump (12-14)
    System Card— Alastair White & Norman Lazonby 2-over-1, Weak No-Trump (12-14), 5-card Majors and 3 Weak twos Neg. Arti- Min. Modifications over Competition Opening Bids Dble. Description Meaning of Responses Subsequent Auction ficial? Cards and Passed Partner (also see notes) Thru 11+ HCP or 5+ playing tricks Limit Raises, natural except: New Suit by responder After overcall: raises pre-emptive, cue-bid Longer minor—1. with 3-3, ‘Inverted’ raises to 2 and 3 forcing for 1 round (F1) strong support, jump cue=splinter 1. 1 3 3 1 with 4-4 in the minors Jump to 2/2/2 = weak jump shift 3rd/4th Suit Forcing (F1) After double: raises pre-emptive, Unsuitable for another opening New suit double jump = Splinter GF Trial bids show Stoppers redouble strength not support 1NT 5-11 HCP F1 unless passed; 11+ HCP or 5+ playing tricks As above but trial bids Generally as above. 2NT = ‘Jacoby’ with good support; 1 1 5 3 Usually at least 5 cards but now ask for help to bid 2. response by passed hand is ‘Drury’ (max 2 over 1 mostly GF; may be light/4 cards in 3rd game in the major pass, agrees major, game try with support) Jump Shift = ‘Mini Splinter’ (F1) 2. Stayman, 2 2 2NT transfers After opening and re- Simple ‘Wriggle’ if 1NT doubled. 12-14 HCP Balanced 1NT 2 2-way (range enquiry or clubs) sponse mostly natural , (see notes). Otherwise natural, (11-14 in 4th after 3 passes) 3. 33 3 GF (see notes) descriptive (see notes) Doubles suggest Penalty After 2NT rebid responses Control Showing: 2=negative Pass=negative response Artificial, Strong and forcing with as for 2NT opening.
    [Show full text]
  • Chance, Luck and Statistics : the Science of Chance
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Alberta Gambling Research Institute Alberta Gambling Research Institute 1963 Chance, luck and statistics : the science of chance Levinson, Horace C. Dover Publications, Inc. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/41334 book Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca Chance, Luck and Statistics THE SCIENCE OF CHANCE (formerly titled: The Science of Chance) BY Horace C. Levinson, Ph. D. Dover Publications, Inc., New York Copyright @ 1939, 1950, 1963 by Horace C. Levinson All rights reserved under Pan American and International Copyright Conventions. Published in Canada by General Publishing Company, Ltd., 30 Lesmill Road, Don Mills, Toronto, Ontario. Published in the United Kingdom by Constable and Company, Ltd., 10 Orange Street, London, W.C. 2. This new Dover edition, first published in 1963. is a revised and enlarged version ot the work pub- lished by Rinehart & Company in 1950 under the former title: The Science of Chance. The first edi- tion of this work, published in 1939, was called Your Chance to Win. International Standard Rook Number: 0-486-21007-3 Libraiy of Congress Catalog Card Number: 63-3453 Manufactured in the United States of America Dover Publications, Inc. 180 Varick Street New York, N.Y. 10014 PREFACE TO DOVER EDITION THE present edition is essentially unchanged from that of 1950. There are only a few revisions that call for comment. On the other hand, the edition of 1950 contained far more extensive revisions of the first edition, which appeared in 1939 under the title Your Chance to Win. One major revision was required by the appearance in 1953 of a very important work, a life of Cardan,* a brief account of whom is given in Chapter 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Glossary
    Bridge Glossary Above the line In rubber bridge points recorded above a horizontal line on the score-pad. These are extra points, beyond those for tricks bid and made, awarded for holding honour cards in trumps, bonuses for scoring game or slam, for winning a rubber, for overtricks on the declaring side and for under-tricks on the defending side, and for fulfilling doubled or redoubled contracts. ACOL/Acol A bidding system commonly played in the UK. Active An approach to defending a hand that emphasizes quickly setting up winners and taking tricks. See Passive Advance cue bid The cue bid of a first round control that occurs before a partnership has agreed on a suit. Advance sacrifice A sacrifice bid made before the opponents have had an opportunity to determine their optimum contract. For example: 1♦ - 1♠ - Dbl - 5♠. Adverse When you are vulnerable and opponents non-vulnerable. Also called "unfavourable vulnerability vulnerability." Agreement An understanding between partners as to the meaning of a particular bid or defensive play. Alert A method of informing the opponents that partner's bid carries a meaning that they might not expect; alerts are regulated by sponsoring organizations such as EBU, and by individual clubs or organisers of events. Any method of alerting may be authorised including saying "Alert", displaying an Alert card from a bidding box or 'knocking' on the table. Announcement An explanatory statement made by the partner of the player who has just made a bid that is based on a partnership understanding. The purpose of an announcement is similar to that of an Alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Slam Bidding Ebook
    Practical Slam Bidding ebook RON KLINGER MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR BIG HANDS INTRODUCTION Slam bidding brings an excitement all of its own. The pulse quickens, adrenalin is pumping, it’s all systems go. The culmination can be euphoria when you are successful, misery when the slam fails. The aim of this book is to increase your euphoria-to-misery ratio. Of all the skills in bridge, experts perform worst in the slam area. You do not need to go far to find the reason: Lack of experience. Slams occur on about 10% of all deals. Compare that with 50% for partscores and 40% for games. No wonder players are less familiar with the big hands. Half of the slam hands will be yours, half will go to your opponents. You can thus expect a slam your way about 5% of the time. That is roughly one deal per session. If you play twice a week, you can hope for about a hundred slams a year. Practise on the 120 deals in this book and study them, and you will have the equivalent of an extra year’s training under your belt. Your euphoria ratio is then bound to rise. How to use this ebook This is not so much an ebook for reading pleasure as a workbook. It is ideal for partnership practice but you can also use it on your own. For each set of hands, the dealer is given, followed by the vulnerability. You and partner are the East and West. If the dealer is North, East comes next; if the dealer is South, West is next.
    [Show full text]
  • Gateway to the West Regional Sunday
    Sunday July 14-19 Hi 92°F Low 75°F Daily Bulletin Gateway to the West Regional All St. Louis Regional Results: for coming to St. Louis and we’d like www.acbl.org & www.unit143.org, to see you right back here again next Unit 143 includes links to the week’s Daily Bulletins. year. We appreciate that you chose to attend our Regional ’coz we do it all for you! to our Caddies, We appreciate your fine work this week! Jackson Florea Anna Garcia Jenna Percich Lauren Percich Clara Riggio Frank Riggio Katie Seibert Kate Vontz Our Date Back to August 15-21, 2016 Come back and join us next August. Please put us on your Regional tournament calendar today. Charity Pairs Series Raises $ BackStoppers will receive the $$$$ that you helped us raise in the Saturday morning Charity Open Pairs Game and will be added to what Last Chance for Registration Gift & was raised in the Wednesday evening Swiss event. We support this To Pick Up Your Section Top Awards organization to express our appreciation for lives given on behalf of Sunday, from 10:00 – 10:20 AM before the Swiss Team session others. Unit 143 will present the check at their October Sectional. begins, and 30 minutes after the sessions end, will be the last opportunity to pick up your convention card holder and section Thanks for playing in these events and showing your support! top awards. Daily Grin How can you tell if someone is a lousy bridge player? No Peeking, Lew! He has 5 smiling Kibitzers watching him play.
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th EUROPEAN OPEN BRIDGE CHAMPIONSHIPS Tromsø, Norway
    [O,<967,(567,5 )90+.,*/(47065:/07: Daily Bulletin Tromsø 27th June-11th July Editor: Mark Horton Co-Editor: Jos Jacobs Lay-out Editor & Photographer: Francesca Canali Journalists: Snorre Aalberg, David Bird, John Carruthers, Patrick Jourdain, Fernando Lema, Micke Melander, Barry Rigal, Ram Soffer, Ron Tacchi THE WHITE HOUSE RULES WEDNESDAY, JULY 1 2015 12 °C Issue No. 4 CONTENTS CLICK TO NAVIGATE Mixed teams, runners up photos, p. 2 Inference or Hypothesis Mark Horton, p. 3 A brace of Grand Slams Barry Rigal, p. 4 Prince Henrik’s Prize MMIXEDI X E D TTEAMSE A M S WINNERSW I N N E R S p. 5 Team White House - Koos Vrieze (President NBB), Meike Wortel, Small is beautiful Jacco Hop, Christina Lund Madsen, Ton Bakkeren A. Roth & F. Lema, p. 6 In a final where most of the significant action took place in the first Caption contest session it was the transnational White House team that assumes the p. 7 mantle of European Mixed Teams Champions. Ton Bakkeren and Lillebaluba vs A J Diamonds I Meike Wortel were winning their second titles (and their third medals) Barry Rigal, p. 8 in the Open Championships. Lillebaluba vs A J Diamonds II Sylvie Willard’s bronze medal was her eighth medal in the Open Ram Soffer, p. 12 Championships, a new record. Philippe Cronier’s bronze makes him the first man to have secured five medals (the same number that his Zimmermann vs Casino Floor Ron Tacchi, p. 16 wife has!). Christina’s action double [O,<967,(567,5,5 )90+.,*/(47065:/07:/07: Daily Bulletin Tromsø A.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer-Oriented Symmetric Relay
    Transfer-Oriented Symmetric Relay Mark Abraham and Josh Sher February 10, 2009 Contents List of Reminders iv 1 Relay Structure 1 1.1 Relay Structure Table of Contents . 1 1.2 General Notes . 1 1.3 Responder’s hand valuation after a strong opening. 2 1.4 Positive shape-showing relays . 2 1.5 Strength asking relays . 6 1.6 Zooming . 6 1.7 Spiral Scan . 6 1.8 Ending relay auctions . 7 1.9 Reverse Relay . 8 1.10 Stopper Asks . 10 1.11 After a negative response to 1♣ .......................... 11 1.12 Interference after 1♣–1♦ .............................. 15 2 Major-oriented one-level openings 16 2.1 General . 16 2.2 Responding to the 1♦ opening . 17 2.3 Responding to the 1♥ opening . 22 2.4 Competitive Bidding . 26 3 Minor-oriented openings 28 3.1 General . 28 3.2 Responding to the 2NT opening . 30 3.3 Competitive Bidding . 30 4 Opening 1NT 32 4.1 Preliminaries . 32 4.2 The Keri 2♣ puppet . 32 4.3 After a transfer to ♥ ................................ 35 4.4 After a transfer to ♠ ............................... 36 ii CONTENTS CONTENTS 4.5 Common structures in Keri major-transfers . 38 4.6 Other sequences . 40 4.7 Slam ideas . 41 4.8 Keri in Competition . 42 4.9 1NT in competition . 42 5 Third and Fourth Seat Adjustments 44 5.1 General . 44 5.2 Opening Bids . 44 iii List of Reminders Shortages are shown high-middle-low order, and accordingly lengths shown low-middle- high. 1 Assymmetric 7-4-1-1 shape-showing 4 Limited hands do not zoom to show strength or controls past 3NT.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Capital Program
    Appendix A BRIDGE CAPITAL PROGRAM East River Bridge Rehabilitation Plans A-1 Bridges Under Construction A-2 Component Rehabilitation A-3 Bridges Under Design A-4 170 2009 BRIDGES AND TUNNELS ANNUAL CONDITION REPORT APPENDIX A-1 MANHATTAN BRIDGE REHABILITATION ITEMS TOTAL ESTIMATED COST Est. Cost ($ in millions) • Repair floor beams. (1982) 0.70* • Replace inspection platforms, subway stringers on approach spans. (1985) 6.30* • Install truss supports on suspended spans. (1985) 0.50* • Partial rehabilitation of walkway. (1989) 3.00* • Rehabilitate truss hangers on east side of bridge. (1989) 0.70* • Install anti-torsional fix (side spans) and rehabilitate upper roadway decks on approach spans on east side; replace drainage system on approach spans, install new lighting on entire upper roadways east side, including purchase of fabricated material for west side of bridge. (1989) 40.30* • Eyebar rehabilitation - Manhattan anchorage Chamber “C”. (1988) 12.20* • Replacement of maintenance platform in the suspended span. (1982) 4.27* • Reconstruct maintenance inspection platforms, including new rail and hanger systems and new electrical and mechanical systems; over 2,000 interim repairs to structural steel support system of lower roadway for future functioning of roadway as a detour during later construction contracts. (1992) 23.50* • Install anti-torsional fix on west side (main and side spans); west upper roadway decks, replace drainage systems on west suspended and approach spans; walkway rehabilitation (install fencing, new lighting on west
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Slam-Bidding Methods
    this page intentionally left blank We-Bad System Document January 16, 2011 “We-Bad”: Contents IV. Competitive-Bidding Methods page numbers apply to PDF only A. Competition After Our Preempt 32 B. Competition After Our Two-Club Opening 32 Introduction 4 C. Competition After Our One-Notrump Opening 33 I. Definitions 5 D. Competition After Our Major-Suit Opening 34 II. General Understandings and E. Competition After Our Minor-Suit Opening 35 Defaults 6 F. Competition After Any Suit One-Bid 36 III. Partnership-Bidding Methods V. Defensive-Bidding Methods A. Opening-Bid A. Initial Defensive-Action Requirements 39 Requirements 10 A2. All-Context Actions 46 B. Choice of Suit 11 B. After Our Double of a One-Bid 46 C. After Our Preempt 12 C. After Our Suit Overcall of a One-Bid 47 D. After Our Two Clubs 13 D. After Our One-Notrump Overcall 48 E. After Our Two-Notrump- E. After We Reopen a One-Bid 48 Family Opening 14 F. When the Opener has Preempted 48 F. After Our One-Notrump G. After Our Sandwich-Position Action 50 Opening 16 G. Delayed Auction Entry 50 G. After Our Major-Suit VI. Slam-Bidding Methods 51 Opening 20 VII. Defensive Carding 59 H. After Our Minor-Suit VIII. Related Tournament-Ready Systems 65 Opening 25 IX. Other Resources 65 I. After Any Suit One-Bid 26 Bridge World Standard following 65 3 of 65 1/16/2011 9:52 AM 3 of 65 We-Bad System Document Introduction (click for BWS) We-Bad is a scientific 5-card major system very distantly descended from Bridge World Standard.
    [Show full text]