No: BH2015/00888 Ward: REGENCY App Type: Full
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
No: BH2015/00888 Ward: REGENCY App Type: Full Planning Address: Sussex Heights 14 St Margarets Place Brighton Proposal: Installation of insulated render to all elevations and replacement of metal window cills with UPVC cills and associated alterations. Officer: Robin Hodgetts, tel: 292366 Valid Date: 10/04/2015 Con Area: Regency Square Expiry Date: 05 June 2015 Listed Building Grade: N/A Agent: RLF, 26 Finsbury Square London EC2A 1DS Applicant: Sussex Heights (Brighton) Limited - SHBL, Sussex Heights St Margarets Place Brighton BN1 2FQ 1 RECOMMENDATION REFUSE planning permission, subject to the reason(s) set out in section 11. 2 SITE LOCATION & DESCRIPTION This application relates to Sussex Heights, a 24 storey residential tower block built c1966-68. Sussex Heights is an extremely prominent modernist landmark building visible from various places in the surrounding area. The original design by Richard Seifert has been partly compromised by the enclosure of some of the balconies and many of the original steel windows have regrettably been replaced in uPVC. The building is located within the Regency Square Conservation Area and is situated adjacent listed buildings. 3 RELEVANT HISTORY None relevant to this application. 4 THE APPLICATION The application seeks consent for the application of an external wall, insulated render system to all of the existing external rendered surfaces of the building. The insulated render system would be applied directly to the existing external surface and would have a thickness of 65mm. The existing metal window cills and headers would also be removed and replaced with upvc along with metal capping to the tops of the balcony parapet walls. 5 PUBLICITY & CONSULTATIONS External: Neighbours: Eight (8) letters of representation have been received from 3b, 9d, 18e, 22e, 23b, 23b, 23c & 24c Sussex Heights objecting to the application for the following reasons:- The proposal is a wasted opportunity to create a modern and beautiful external façade; The proposal would significantly alter the lines and visual integrity of Sussex Heights; Cladding directly onto the solid building, which already has damp problems, would create future problems. One (1) letter of representation supporting the application has been received from 8c Sussex Heights supporting the application as there is a need to ensure the building is water-tight. The proposed work will maintain the basic appearance while making Sussex House brighter and cleaner. Internal: Heritage: The application is seeking planning permission for the installation of insulated render to all elevations of the building and replacement of the metal window cills with uPVC cills and associated alterations. The prominent application building is situated within a conservation area and within the setting of listed buildings; therefore the proposed installation of render to the building should seek to preserve, enhance and/or better reveal the character and appearance of the conservation area and preserve the setting of the listed buildings. It is set out at paragraph 128 of the Framework that an applicant should “describe the significance of any heritage assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting (and) …the level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ importance and no more than is sufficient to understand the potential impact of the proposal on their significance.” Unfortunately, and contrary to the Framework, the application does not include an appropriate level of supporting information which would allow one to have an informed understanding regarding the potential impact of the proposed render system on the aforementioned heritage assets. For example, the section drawings appear to show the window detail to the enclosed balcony areas; these windows are set within reveals whereas the windows to the building elevations are set flush with the outer face of the wall. Additional details have been submitted during the application process however, the sample panel of white painted render is too rough textured. Furthermore, the section showing the proposed window cill detail would be odd; the cill is noticeably slanted and the profile under the cill plate is rather deep and would be a poor detail. There are also concerns regarding the long term performance of the proposed system. Due to the exposed nature of the building in the marine environment, the proposed finish will be vulnerable to heavy weathering and the application does not confirm that the product has been tested in such an environment. Thus, there are concerns with regards the performance of the product in the proposed location and the required long term maintenance. In additional to above, the proposed use of uPVC cills to replace the existing metal cill detail is resisted. Metal cills and windows were part of the original building design and the appearance and finish of uPVC would conflict with the character and appearance of the building. By virtue of the lack of detailed information regarding the proposed rendering system and the inappropriate render sample and additional detail submitted during the application process, it is considered that the current proposal would not serve to preserve, enhance or better reveal the character and appearance of the conservation area, or preserve the setting of the surrounding listed buildings. The proposal would thus be contrary to Sections 66(1) & 72(2) of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, Sections 7 & 12 of the NPPF and Local Plan Policies QD4; QD5; QD14; HE3 & HE6. 6 MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS Section 38 (6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 states that “If regard is to be had to the development plan for the purpose of any determination to be made under the planning Acts the determination must be made in accordance with the plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.” The development plan is: Brighton & Hove Local Plan 2005 (saved policies post 2007); East Sussex, South Downs and Brighton & Hove Waste and Minerals Plan (Adopted February 2013); East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Minerals Local Plan (November 1999); Saved policies 3,4,32 and 36 – all outside of Brighton & Hove; East Sussex and Brighton & Hove Waste Local Plan (February 2006); Saved Policies WLP 7 and WLP8 only – site allocations at Sackville Coalyard and Hangleton Bottom and Hollingdean Depot. The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) was published on 27 March 2012 and is a material consideration which applies with immediate effect. Due weight should be given to relevant policies in the development plan according to their degree of consistency with the NPPF. The Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One (submission document) is an emerging development plan. The NPPF advises that weight may be given to relevant policies in emerging plans according to their stage of preparation, the extent to which there are unresolved objections to relevant policies and the degree of consistency of the relevant policies to the policies in the NPPF. All material considerations and any policy conflicts are identified in the “Considerations and Assessment” section of the report. 7 RELEVANT POLICIES & GUIDANCE The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) Brighton & Hove Local Plan: QD1 Design - quality of development and design statements QD2 Design - key principles for neighbourhoods QD14 Extensions and alterations QD27 Protection of Amenity HE3 Development affecting the setting of a listed building HE6 Development within or affecting the setting of conservation areas Supplementary Planning Document: SPD12 Design Guide for Extensions and Alterations Brighton & Hove City Plan Part One (submission document) SS1 Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development 8 CONSIDERATIONS & ASSESSMENT The main considerations in the determination of this application relate to the impact that the proposed development would have on the character and appearance of the host building and wider Regency Square Conservation Area. Character and appearance Sussex Heights is a 24 storey, residential block which is highly visible within the surrounding townscape and within the Regency Square Conservation Area. The surrounding area is a mix of modern commercial developments such as Churchill Square shopping centre to the east and historic squares such as Russell Square to the north. The proposed external wall, insulated render system (StoTherm System) would be applied to all existing, external wall surfaces and thus would have a significant impact upon the character and appearance of the building. The render system includes layers of insulation which would create a considerable thickness of approximately 60-65mm. This, when applied to the exterior of the building, would have a significant impact upon the setting of existing window cills and headers along with the setting of balcony parapet walls, fundamentally changing the appearance of the building and the relationship between the fenestration and exterior walls. A sample of the exterior render has been provided by the applicant, which would be white with a rough finish. This rough finish would result in a considerably different character, with the texture considered inappropriate for a building of this prominence in such a sensitive setting. The proposal would also include the removal of existing window cills and headers and their replacement with upvc. Due to the thickness of the proposed render system and the required gradient of the cills an alien profile would be created which would contrast with the existing