Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2010 Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management Jack Douglas Galloway [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Nuclear Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Galloway, Jack Douglas, "Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/798 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jack Douglas Galloway entitled "Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Nuclear Engineering. G. Ivan Maldonado, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Kevin T. Clarno, Lee L. Riedinger, Arthur E. Ruggles Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Jack Douglas Galloway entitled “Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management” I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Nuclear Engineering. G. Ivan Maldonado, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Kevin T. Clarno Lee L. Riedinger Arthur E. Ruggles Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) i Boiling Water Reactor Core Simulation with Generalized Isotopic Inventory Tracking for Actinide Management A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jack Douglas Galloway August 2010 i Copyright © 2010 by Jack Douglas Galloway All rights reserved. ii Acknowledgments In this short space I would like to thank all the people who have worked to be a support to me throughout this endeavor. First off, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. G. Ivan Maldonado, who years ago pursued and encouraged me to enroll in graduate school and who has been an invaluable technical advisor as well as friend through these years. The number of people who have served as encouragements, technical support, and fellowship are too numerous to mention, but those who have stood out will be mentioned. Dr. Matthew Jessee as both friend and technical mentor, Dr. Kevin Clarno who is also serving on my committee, Dr. Ian Gauld who always had his door open to help, David Dixon who’s friendship has been a joy for years, Hermilo Hernandez, the number of collaborators at Oak Ridge National Laboratory who have worked to keep me both funded and serving on a truly enjoyable project. In addition I would like to thank Julie and Jon, my sister and brother, for their emotional support and encouragement. I want to thank my wife, Becky, for the support and encouragement she has provided throughout this journey. As I look at the people who have surrounded me and been my support through these years I am both humbled and thankful. The most influential people in my life are my parents Gary and Jennie Galloway. I am so thankful for Mom’s constant encouragement and affirming words. I also thank my Dad; as a mentor in Christ, as a Father figure, as a nuclear engineer. I only hope I can garner the respect of my peers in technical prowess and more importantly in strength of character and humility that he has over his years as a nuclear engineer. Finally, and most importantly, I want to thank Christ Jesus, to whom I gave my life over to many years ago, and who has never failed. As I look back through this journey, I see how He has fulfilled his promise to never leave; especially in the most difficult times. May this document serve as a witness to me and those who read, testifying to Christ’s faithfulness. iii Abstract The computational ability to accurately simulate boiling water reactor operation under the full range of standard steady-state operation, along with the capability to fully track the isotopic distribution of any fueled region in any location in the core has been developed. This new three-dimensional node-by-node capability can help designers track, for example, a full suite of minor and major actinides, fission products, and even light elements that result from depletion, decay, or transmutations. This isotopic tracking capability is not restricted to BWRs and can be employed in the modeling of PWRs, CANDUs, and other reactor types that can be modeled with the NESTLE code, the base core simulator employed in this research. To accurately simulate boiling water reactor operation, a major thermal-hydraulics upgrade was performed which involved the implementation of a drift-flux solution scheme to model steady- state boiling water flow. Sub-cooled boiling and bulk boiling are accurately modeled and a scheme for computing the correct flow distribution has been implemented. In addition, the incorporation of a nodal ORIGEN-based microscopic depletion solution has been included which allows for exceptional detail in tracking a large number of elements in every node of a core design, thus accounting for spectral dependencies such as moderator density effects, moderator temperature effects, fuel temperature effects, as well as controlled or uncontrolled conditions. The results of this study show the excellent fidelity of the two-phase solution for accurately predicting the boiling of water when compared to experimental results. Likewise, the isotopic inventory results show near-identical agreement with the well-established and validated ORIGEN-based SCALE/TRITON isotopic depletion sequence. The aim of these developments is to eventually produce a publicly available three-dimensional core simulator capable of assessing detailed isotopic inventories, a capability particularly valuable for the evaluation of recycling scenarios and actinide management in a variety of reactor types and fuel designs. iv Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Literature Review ............................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Transmutation ........................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Thermal-Hydraulics ................................................................................................. 10 1.2.3 Isotopics .................................................................................................................. 11 2 Proof of Principle Studies ...................................................................................................... 13 3 Two-Phase Thermal-Hydraulic Model ................................................................................... 24 3.1 Thermal-Hydraulics Overview ........................................................................................ 24 3.2 Nestle Drift-Flux Solution ............................................................................................... 26 3.3 Flow Distribution ............................................................................................................ 37 3.4 Thermal Limits ................................................................................................................ 42 4 Code Validation ..................................................................................................................... 43 4.1 Water Property Validation ............................................................................................. 43 4.2 Thermal-Hydraulic Validation ........................................................................................ 46 4.2.1 Benchmark Overview .............................................................................................. 46 4.2.2 Experiment Description .......................................................................................... 47 4.2.3 Single Phase Results ................................................................................................ 48 4.2.4 Two-Phase Results .................................................................................................. 54 4.3 Coupled Neutronics and Thermal Hydraulics Validation ............................................... 61 v 4.3.1 NESTLE Input ..........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the US
    Spent Nuclear Fuel Pools in the U.S.: Reducing the Deadly Risks of Storage front cover WITH SUPPORT FROM: WITH SUPPORT FROM: By Robert Alvarez 1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600, Washington DC 20036 - www.ips-dc.org May 2011 About the Author Robert Alvarez, an Institute for Policy Studies senior scholar, served as a Senior Policy Advisor to the Secre- tary of Energy during the Clinton administration. Institute for Policy Studies (IPS-DC.org) is a community of public scholars and organizers linking peace, justice, and the environment in the U.S. and globally. We work with social movements to promote true democracy and challenge concentrated wealth, corporate influence, and military power. Project On Government Oversight (POGO.org) was founded in 1981 as an independent nonprofit that investigates and exposes corruption and other misconduct in order to achieve a more effective, accountable, open, and ethical federal government. Institute for Policy Studies 1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 http://www.ips-dc.org © 2011 Institute for Policy Studies [email protected] For additional copies of this report, see www.ips-dc.org Table of Contents Summary ...............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................4 Figure 1: Explosion Sequence at Reactor No. 3 ........................................................4 Figure 2: Reactor No. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Light Water Reactor System Designed to Minimize Environmental Burden of Radioactive Waste
    Hitachi Review Vol. 63 (2014), No. 9 602 Featured Articles Light Water Reactor System Designed to Minimize Environmental Burden of Radioactive Waste Tetsushi Hino, Dr. Sci. OVERVIEW: One of the problems with nuclear power generation is the Masaya Ohtsuka, Dr. Eng. accumulation in radioactive waste of the long-lived TRUs generated as Kumiaki Moriya byproducts of the fission of uranium fuel. Hitachi is developing a nuclear reactor that can burn TRU fuel and is based on a BWR design that is Masayoshi Matsuura already in use in commercial reactors. Achieving the efficient fission of TRUs requires that the spectrum of neutron energies in the nuclear reactor be modified to promote nuclear reactions by these elements. By taking advantage of one of the features of BWRs, namely that their neutron energy spectrum is more easily controlled than that of other reactor types, the new reactor combines effective use of resources with a reduction in the load on the environment by using TRUs as fuel that can be repeatedly recycled to burn these elements up. This article describes the concept behind the INTRODUCTION RBWR along with the progress of its development, NUCLEAR power generation has an important role to as well as its specifications and features. play in both energy security and reducing emissions of carbon dioxide. One of its problems, however, is the accumulation in radioactive waste from the long- RBWR CONCEPT lived transuranium elements (TRUs) generated as Plutonium Breeding Reactor byproducts of the fission of uranium fuel. The TRUs The original concept on which the RBWR is based include many different isotopes with half-lives ranging was the plutonium generation boiling water reactor from hundreds to tens of thousands of years or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Analysis for Boiling Water Reactors
    Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH Safety Analysis for Boiling Water Reactors A Summary GRS - 98 Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH Safety Analysis for Boiling Water Reactors A Summary E. Kersting J. von Linden D. Müller-Ecker W. Werner Translation by F. Janowski July 1993 GRS - 98 ISBN 3-923875-48-7 Note This report is the translation of GRS-95 "Sicherheitsanalyse für Siedewasserreaktoren - Zusammenfassende Darstellung". Recent analysis results - concerning the chapters on accident management, fire and earthquake - that were not included in the German text have been added to this translation. In cases of doubt, GRS-102 (main volume) is the factually correct version. Keywords Safety analysis, PSA, boiling water reactor, accidents, event-sequence analysis, systems analysis, fault-tree analysis, reliability data, accident management Abstract After completing the German Risk Study for pressurised water reactors, the Gesell­ schaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) has now conducted for the first time a probabilistic safety analysis for boiling water reactors (BWR) on behalf of the Federal Minister for Research and Technology (BMFT). Reactor safety is constantly developed in line with research findings and operating experience. Thus reactor safety is a dynamic process in which safety analyses play an important role. Probabilistic safety analyses determine the frequency of certain events (e.g. leaks in pipes) and the failure probabilities of the safety systems needed to control such events. The failure of safety systems initially leads to a hazard to the cooling of the reactor core. When such hazard states occur, there are accident­ management measures which can still be carried out in order to prevent core melt.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors
    Project No. 11-3023 Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors Reactor Concepts Dr. Ehud Greenspan University of California-Berkeley In collaboration with: Massachusetts Institute of Technology University of Michigan Brookhaven National Laboratory Brian Robinson, Federal POC Temitope Taiwo, Technical POC NEUP Project # 11-3023 September 2011 to December 2014 Self-sustaining thorium boiling water reactors Summary Report Ehud Greenspan, Phillip M. Gorman, Sandra Bogetic, Jeffrey E. Seifried, Guanheng Zhang, Christopher R. Varela, Massimiliano Fratoni and Jasmina L. Vujic UC Berkeley, [email protected] Thomas Downar, Andrew Hall, Andrew Ward, Michael Jarrett, Aaron Wysocki and Yunlin Xu University of Michigan, [email protected] Mujid Kazimi, Koroush Shirvan and Alexander Mieloszyk MIT, [email protected] Michael Todosow, Nicholas Brown and Lap Cheng BNL, [email protected] 28 February 2015 1 Table of Contents Overview Page Executive summary 3 1. Introduction 7 2. The RBWR cores 7 2.1 Hitachi RBWR cores 7 2.2 Independent evaluation of the Hitachi designs 14 2.3 The incentive for thorium-based RBWR 15 2.4 The thorium-based RBWR core designs 17 3. Development of computational methods for RBWR type cores 19 3.1 3-D core simulator 20 3.2 Monte-Carlo based coupled neutronics - TH - depletion analysis capability 21 3.3 Stability and safety analysis capability 21 3.4 Fuel performance analysis capability 22 3.5 Thermal hydraulic correlations for tight lattice high void cores 24 4. Feasibility of fuel-self-sustaining RBWR-Th cores 24 4.1 Study strategy 24 4.2 RBWR-Th core designs 26 4.3 RBWR-Th safety and stability 30 4.4 RBWR-Th fuel performance 31 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Technical Feasibility of Fusion Energy to the Special Committee for the ITER Project
    March 8, ASDEX Upgrade Seminar Report on Technical Feasibility of Fusion Energy to the Special Committee for the ITER Project M. Kikuchi Former member of subcommittee for Fusion Development Strategy under Fusion Council Structure of Fusion Program Promotion in Japan (before May 17,2000) Special committee for the ITER Project Chair: Prof. H. Yoshikawa Atomic Energy Fusion ITER/EDA Technical Commission Council Subcommittee Chair: Prof. N. Inoue Chair: Prof. M. Wakatani Planning and Promotion Subcommittee Chair: Prof. K. Miya Subcommittee for Fusion Development Strategy Chair: Prof. N. Inoue 1 Charge to Subcommittee for Fusion Development Strategy (3) Technical feasibility of the fusion energy (4) Extension of the program and basic supporting research For topic (3) above, the Special Committee additionally requested an evaluation of the feasibility of fusion energy as a safe and reliable energy source from the aspects of technical potential, management capability, and characteristics of Japanese industrial structure. Two other subcommittes are formed for answering (1) Survey of long term demand and supply of energy sources (2) Feasibility study of alternative energy sources (5) Distribution of resources for research (6) International relations. 2 Members of Subcommittee for Fusion Development Strategy (April 2000) Nobuyuki Inoue (Chairman) Chairman of Fusion Council Professor, Institute of Advanced Energy, Kyoto University) Katsunori Abe Professor, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University Kunihiko Okano Research Fellow, Komae Research
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Nuclear Energy 105 (2018) 83–98
    Progress in Nuclear Energy 105 (2018) 83–98 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Nuclear Energy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pnucene Technology perspectives from 1950 to 2100 and policy implications for the T global nuclear power industry Victor Nian Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: There have been two completed phases of developments in nuclear reactor technologies. The first phase is the Nuclear industry trends demonstration of exploratory Generation I reactors. The second phase is the rapid scale-up of Generation II Nuclear energy policy reactors in North America and Western Europe followed by East Asia. We are in the third phase, which is the ff Technology di usion construction of evolutionary Generation III/III+ reactors. Driven by the need for safer and more affordable New user state nuclear reactors post-Fukushima, the nuclear industry has, in parallel, entered the fourth phase, which is the International cooperation development of innovative Generation IV reactors. Through a comprehensive review of the historical reactor Advanced reactor development technology developments in major nuclear states, namely, USA, Russia, France, Japan, South Korea, and China, this study presents a projection on the future potentials of advanced reactor technologies, with particular focus on pressurized water reactors, high temperature reactors, and fast reactors, by 2100. The projected potentials provide alternative scenarios to develop insights that complement the established technology roadmaps. Findings suggest that there is no clear winner among these technologies, but fast reactors could demonstrate a new and important decision factor for emerging markets. Findings also suggest small modular reactors, espe- cially those belonging to Generation IV, as a transitional technology for developing domestic market and in- digenous technology competence for emerging nuclear states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Ligand Design for U(VI) and Pu(IV)* by Géza Szigethy BA
    Rational Ligand Design for U(VI) and Pu(IV)* by Géza Szigethy B.A. (Princeton University), 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kenneth N. Raymond, Chair Professor Richard A. Andersen Professor Garrison Sposito Fall 2009 * This research and the ALS are supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (OBES), and the OBES Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the U.S. Department of Energy at LBNL under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. Rational Ligand Design for U(VI) and Pu(IV) by Géza Szigethy B.A. (Princeton University), 2004 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Kenneth N. Raymond, Chair Professor Richard A. Andersen Professor Garrison Sposito Fall 2009 Rational Ligand Design for U(VI) and Pu(IV) Copyright © 2009 Géza Szigethy Abstract Rational Ligand Design for U(VI) and Pu(IV) by Géza Szigethy Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor Kenneth N. Raymond, Chair Nuclear power is an attractive alternative to hydrocarbon-based energy production at a time when moving away from carbon-producing processes is widely accepted as a significant developmental need. Hence, the radioactive actinide power sources for this industry are necessarily becoming more widespread, which is accompanied by the increased risk of exposure to both biological and environmental systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelation of Actinides
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Chelation of Actinides Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b57t174 Author Abergel, RJ Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.1039/9781782623892-00183 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Chapter 6 Chelation of Actinides rebecca J. abergela aChemical Sciences Division, lawrence berkeley National laboratory, One Cyclotron road, berkeley, Ca 94720, USa *e-mail: [email protected] 6.1 The Medical and Public Health Relevance of Actinide Chelation the use of actinides in the civilian industry and defense sectors over the past 60 years has resulted in persistent environmental and health issues, since a large inventory of radionuclides, including actinides such as thorium (th), uranium (U), neptunium (Np), plutonium (pu), americium (am) and curium 1 Downloaded by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory on 22/06/2018 20:28:11. (Cm), are generated and released during these activities. Controlled process- Published on 18 October 2016 http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/9781782623892-00183 ing and disposal of wastes from the nuclear fuel cycle are the main source of actinide dissemination. however, significant quantities of these radionu- clides have also been dispersed as a consequence of nuclear weapons testing, nuclear power plant accidents, and compromised storage of nuclear materi- als.1 In addition, events of the last fifteen years have heightened public con- cern that actinides may be released as the result of the potential terrorist use of radiological dispersal devices or after a natural disaster affecting nuclear power plants or nuclear material storage sites.2,3 all isotopes of the 15 ele- ments of the actinide series (atomic numbers 89 through 103, Figure 6.1) are radioactive and have the potential to be harmful; the heaviest members, however, are too unstable to be isolated in quantities larger than a few atoms at a time,4 and those elements cited above (U, Np, pu, am, Cm) are the most RSC Metallobiology Series No.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Annual Report 2007/2008
    Wissenschaftlich-Technische Berichte FZD-517 2009 Bi-Annual Report 2007/2008 The Rossendorf-Beamline at ESRF (ROBL-CRG) Editors: A.C. Scheinost and C. Baehtz Preface The Rossendorf Beamline (ROBL) - located at BM20 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France - is in operation since 1998. This 6th report covers the period from January 2007 to December 2008. In these two years, 50 peer- reviewed papers have been published based on experiments done at the beamline. The average citation index, which increased constantly over the years, has now reached 3.5 (RCH) and 3.0 (MRH), indicating that papers are predominately published in journals with high impact factors. Six exemplary highlight reports on the following pages should demonstrate the scientific strength and diversity of the experiments performed on the two end-stations of the beamline, dedicated to Radiochemistry (RCH) and Materials Research (MRH). Demand for beamtime remains very high as in the previous years, with an average oversubscription rate of 1.8 for ESRF experiments. The attractiveness of our beamline is based upon the high specialization of its two end-stations. RCH is one of only two stations in Europe dedicated to x-ray absorption spectroscopy of actinides and other radionuclides. The INE beamline at ANKA provides superior experimental flexibility and extends to lower energies, including important elements like P and S. In contrast, ROBL-RCH provides a much higher photon flux, hence lower detection limits crucial for environmental samples, and a higher energy range extending to elements like Sb and I. Therefore, both beamlines are highly complementary, covering different aspects of radiochemistry research.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors
    Project No. 11-3023 Self-Sustaining Thorium Boiling Water Reactors Reactor Concepts Dr. Ehud Greenspan University of California-Berkeley In collaboraon with: Massachuses Instute of Technology University of Michigan Brookhaven Naonal Laboratory Brian Robinson, Federal POC Temitope Taiwo, Technical POC NEUP Project # 11-3023 September 2011 to December 2014 Self-sustaining thorium boiling water reactors Summary Report Ehud Greenspan, Phillip M. Gorman, Sandra Bogetic, Jeffrey E. Seifried, Guanheng Zhang, Christopher R. Varela, Massimiliano Fratoni and Jasmina L. Vujic UC Berkeley, [email protected] Thomas Downar, Andrew Hall, Andrew Ward, Michael Jarrett, Aaron Wysocki and Yunlin Xu University of Michigan, [email protected] Mujid Kazimi, Koroush Shirvan and Alexander Mieloszyk MIT, [email protected] Michael Todosow, Nicholas Brown and Lap Cheng BNL, [email protected] 28 February 2015 1 Table of Contents Overview Page Executive summary 3 1. Introduction 7 2. The RBWR cores 7 2.1 Hitachi RBWR cores 7 2.2 Independent evaluation of the Hitachi designs 14 2.3 The incentive for thorium-based RBWR 15 2.4 The thorium-based RBWR core designs 17 3. Development of computational methods for RBWR type cores 19 3.1 3-D core simulator 20 3.2 Monte-Carlo based coupled neutronics – TH – depletion analysis capability 21 3.3 Stability and safety analysis capability 21 3.4 Fuel performance analysis capability 22 3.5 Thermal hydraulic correlations for tight lattice high void cores 24 4. Feasibility of fuel-self-sustaining RBWR-Th cores 24 4.1 Study strategy 24 4.2 RBWR-Th core designs 26 4.3 RBWR-Th safety and stability 30 4.4 RBWR-Th fuel performance 31 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
    Fundamentals of Nuclear Power Juan S. Giraldo Douglas J. Gotham David G. Nderitu Paul V. Preckel Darla J. Mize State Utility Forecasting Group December 2012 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... v Glossary ........................................................................................................................................... vi Foreword ........................................................................................................................................ vii 1. Overview ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Current state of nuclear power generation in the U.S. ......................................... 1 1.2 Nuclear power around the world ........................................................................... 4 2. Nuclear Energy .................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 How nuclear power plants generate electricity ..................................................... 9 2.2 Radioactive decay .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]