DOCSLIB.ORG

Unexplained Infertility

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Unexplained Infertility Unexplained Infertility Kaylen M. Silverberg, M.D. Thomas C. Vaughn, M.D. Texas Fertility Center Austin, Texas Introduction Infertility is generally defined as the inability to conceive following one year of unprotected intercourse. This definition is often modified in couples where the female partner is 35 years of age or older, such that an infertility evaluation may be encouraged following only 6 months of unsuccessful attempted conception. Up to 30% of couples presenting with this chief complaint are eventually diagnosed as having unexplained infertility.1 Couples with unexplained infertility are thought to represent either a subpopulation of patients in the lower extreme end of the normal distribution of fertility, or a group of patients with a defect in fecundity not detected by the routine infertility evaluation.2 When compared to “normal, fertile” patients, couples with unexplained infertility demonstrate both diminished and delayed fecundity. Untreated, their pregnancy rates have been reported to be 34% within 6 months, 76% within 2 years, and 87% within 5 years.3 In a review of previously published prospective, randomized trials, Guzick et al determined the cycle fecundity rate with expectant management in couples with unexplained infertility to be 1.3-4.1% - compared to the generally accepted cycle fecundity of 20% in proven fertile couples. 4 This chapter will provide a critical, evidence based review of both the diagnosis and treatment of unexplained infertility. Diagnosis Traditionally, a diagnosis of unexplained infertility is made only when the basic infertility evaluation fails to reveal an obvious abnormality. This diagnosis therefore implies that a couple has evidence of normal, timely ovulation, adequate sperm production, fallopian tube patency, normal integrity of the endometrial cavity, adequate cervical mucus production, timely development of endometrial secretory change, and no evidence of pelvic endometriosis. Until recently, the basic infertility work-up included basal body temperature charting, a semen analysis, a hysterosalpingogram (HSG), a post- coital test (PCT), an endometrial biopsy (EMB), and a diagnostic laparoscopy. Over the past several years, both the PCT and the EMB have fallen into disfavor. Two studies in particular helped diminish the importance of the PCT. In the early 1980s, a group of investigators performed mid-cycle intracervical insemination in a group of infertile women, followed a few hours later by laparoscopy.5 During the surgical procedure, samples of cervical mucous and fluid surrounding the distal fallopian tubes were collected and analyzed for the presence of motile and non-motile sperm. The investigators were unable to correlate the findings in the cervical mucous with the findings in the peritoneal fluid surrounding the tubes and ovaries. In 1984, Collins, et al. followed a large group of patients who had discontinued their infertility treatment.6 Pregnancy rates observed over a subsequent two-year period of time were correlated with results obtained from post-coital tests performed during their evaluations. No statistically significant differences in pregnancy rates were observed in these couples, despite PCT results varying from more than 11 motile sperm per high power microscope field to no sperm seen at all. Based primarily on these studies, the PCT is no longer an integral part of the contemporary evaluation of infertility. While some physicians may still use it in isolated instances, such as assessing cervical mucous production in women treated with clomiphene citrate in order to determine whether or not to recommend intrauterine insemination (IUI), many others have eliminated it from their evaluation algorithm altogether. The routine endometrial biopsy is also no longer a universally accepted part of the contemporary infertility evaluation. Initially proposed as the optimal way to assess the synchrony between the development of the endometrium and the embryo, the EMB was plagued by differences in interpretation as well as the fact that up to 30% of normal ovulatory women can have an occasional out of phase biopsy. 7 It may, therefore, be both reasonable and cost-effective to actually perform a biopsy only after a luteal phase length of fewer than 11 days has been detected in a preceding cycle. This approach will minimize patient discomfort and cost, while possibly reducing the incidence of a false positive diagnosis as well. Although still thought to be a cause of recurrent miscarriage, more recent data suggest that luteal phase defect is not a prevalent cause of infertility.8 The role of routine laparoscopy continues to be a source of much controversy, just like the association between endometriosis and infertility. Although most investigators recognize a strong correlation between infertility and stage III and IV endometriosis, no such consensus is present for stage I and II disease. A recent prospective, randomized, multicenter Canadian trial (“EndoCAN”) was the first well-designed study to demonstrate such an association.9 In this trial, women diagnosed intraoperatively with Stage I or II disease were randomized to intraoperative resection or ablation of their disease or diagnosis alone. All patients were then followed expectantly for a minimum of 36 weeks. At the end of the study period, 31% of the patients in the laparoscopic surgery group had conceived, compared to 18% in the diagnostic group (p<0.05). Although interesting, these findings have not been universally accepted. A subsequent prospective, randomized Italian trial, similarly designed, has shown no difference in the one-year postoperative birth rate in 96 women undergoing resection/ablation or diagnosis alone at the time of laparoscopy.10 In the patient with a normal HSG and pelvic examination, who has no history of prior IUD usage, PID, or previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, the likelihood of finding significant pelvic adhesions is remote. In addition, an early or mid-follicular transvaginal sonogram appears to be a reasonable screening test for the presence of an ovarian endometrioma. In the absence of such a lesion, one can rule out the presence of Stage III or IV endometriosis with a high degree of certainty. Recent data suggest that a good history, an HSG, and a single transvaginal ultrasound may well eliminate a needless laparoscopy in up to 40% of patients. This number may even be higher if one includes patients who are found to have only stage I or II endometriosis at laparoscopy.11 Just as some tests appear to be losing their place in the diagnostic algorithm for infertility, others appear to be gaining inclusion. Recently, many specialists have added an early or mid-cycle pelvic sonogram to the basic infertility evaluation. This examination facilitates the detection of uterine leiomyomata, endometrial polyps, and ovarian pathology, while also affording a timely assessment of maximal endometrial thickness and pattern. As no universal algorithm exists for the diagnosis of infertility, it should not be surprising that there appears to be a lack of consistency among even Board Certified Reproductive Endocrinologists (REs). Glatstein et al., recently published a nationwide survey assessing the tests employed by such specialists as part of their routine infertility evaluation. Of the 473 Board Certified REs surveyed, 397 responded, representing a response rate of 83.9%.12 Of the respondents, 54.7% were university hospital affiliated, while 45.3% were in private practice. Results from the survey (Table 1) indicate that at least 89% of REs perform a basic evaluation that includes a semen analysis, at least one method of ovulation assessment, an HSG, and a laparoscopy. Seventy-nine percent still perform post-coital testing, while 62.5% routinely perform an endometrial biopsy. Treatment Some data suggest that approximately 60% of couples with unexplained infertility of less than three years’ duration will become pregnant with three years of expectant therapy.14,15 Although these data may be somewhat promising, it is frequently difficult to ask a patient, even if she is young, to “keep trying for a few more years”. In addition, following three years of infertility, the prospect of future fertility decreases by 24% each year.16 Therefore it is reasonable to initiate therapy once the couple is concerned enough to have made the decision to consult a physician. The average normal fecundity for fertile couples in which the female partner is 35 years of age or younger is 20-25%, however the monthly pregnancy rate for couples with unexplained infertility is only 1.3-4.1%.4 A laudable goal for the physician is therefore to increase the pregnancy rate for these couples to the normal monthly fecundity for fertile couples. In the absence of a single correctable abnormality, the therapy for unexplained infertility has, by default, been empiric. Several different treatment regimens have been proposed, including the use of intrauterine insemination (IUI) with or without superovulation with either oral or injectable medications and the assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). As these patients may truly be subfertile, rather than infertile, the need for appropriately designed controlled trials evaluating these empiric therapies is profound. Unfortunately, there has been a relative paucity of such studies. Intrauterine Insemination The use of IUI appears to improve cycle fecundity when combined with either clomiphene citrate (CC) or gonadotropins (see below), but its use alone in couples with purely
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artificial Insemination
    Ch36-A03309.qxd 1/23/07 5:16 PM Page 539 Section 6 Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Chapter Artificial Insemination 36 Ashok Agarwal and Shyam S. R. Allamaneni INTRODUCTION widely available, the terms homologous artificial insemination and heterologous artificial insemination were used to differentiate Artificial insemination is an assisted conception method that can these two alternative sources. However, the use of these bio- be used to alleviate infertility in selected couples. The rationale medical terms in this manner is at variance with their scientific behind the use of artificial insemination is to increase the gamete meaning, where they denote different species or organisms (as in, density near the site of fertilization.1 The effectiveness of artificial e.g., homologous and heterologous tissue grafts). insemination has been clearly established in specific subsets of In the latter half of the 20th century, the terms artificial infertile patients such as those with idiopathic infertility, infertility insemination, donor (AID) and artificial insemination, husband related to a cervical factor, or a mild male factor infertility (AIH) found common use. However, the widespread use of the (Table 36-1).2,3 An accepted advantage of artificial insemination acronym AIDS for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome resulted is that it is generally less expensive and invasive than other in the replacement of AID with therapeutic donor insemination assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures.4 (TDI). An analogous alternative term for AIH has not evolved, This chapter provides a comprehensive description of probably in part because of the increasingly common situation indications for artificial insemination, issues to consider before where the woman’s partner is not her legal husband.
    [Show full text]
  • Unexplained Infertility
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Finland UNEXPLAINED INFERTILITY Studies on aetiology, treatment options and obstetric outcome RITA ISAKSSON ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented by permission of the Medical Faculty of the University of Helsinki for public criticism in the Auditorium of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, Helsinki, on October 18th, 2002, at 12 noon. Helsinki 2002 1 Supervised by Docent Aila Tiitinen, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Helsinki University Central Hospital Docent Bruno Cacciatore, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Helsinki University Central Hospital Reviewed by Docent Anne-Maria Suikkari, M.D., Ph.D. The Family Federation of Finland, Infertility Clinic, Helsinki Docent Aydin Tekay, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Oulu University Central Hospital Offi cial opponent Docent Hannu Martikainen, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Oulu University Central Hospital ISBN 952-91-5071-7 (print) ISBN 952-10-0712-5 (PDF) Yliopistopaino Helsinki 2002 2 To my family 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ORIGINAL PUBLICATIONS ....................................................................7 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions and Relevance of Unexplained Infertility in Reproductive Medicine 5
    Definitions and Relevance of Unexplained Infertility 1 in Reproductive Medicine Sandro C. Esteves, Glenn L. Schattman and Ashok Agarwal Infertility is customarily defined as the inability of a sexually infertility can result from congenital or acquired urogenital active couple with no contraception to achieve natural preg- abnormalities, urogenital tract infections, increased scrotal nancy within one year [1]. The American Society for Repro- temperature such as a consequence of varicocele, endocrine ductive Medicine (ASRM) considers infertility as a disease, disturbances, genetic abnormalities, immunological factors, which by definition is ‘‘any deviation from or interruption of lifestyle habits (e.g., obesity, smoking, and use of gonado- the normal structure or function of any part, organ, or system toxins), systemic diseases, erectile dysfunction, and incor- of the body as manifested by characteristic symptoms and rect coital habitus. Unfortunately, owed to limitations in our signs; the etiology, pathology, and prognosis may be known understanding of the events that take place during natural or unknown’’ [2, 3]. conception, and in view of the crude diagnostic tests avail- It has been estimated that 15 % of couples seek medical able to identify potential abnormalities, the cause of infertil- assistance for infertility, and the origins of the problem seem ity is not determined in nearly half of the cases. Moreover, to be equally distributed between male and female partners approximately 5 % of couples remain unwillingly childless [1]. Taking into account a global perspective and a world despite multiple interventions [1, 8, 9]. population of 7 billion people, these figures indicate that ap- Infertility of unknown origin comprises both idiopathic proximately 140 million people (2.2 %) face infertility [4, 5].
    [Show full text]
  • Male Infertility Is a Women's Health Issue—Research and Clinical
    cells Review Male Infertility is a Women’s Health Issue—Research and Clinical Evaluation of Male Infertility Is Needed Katerina A. Turner 1 , Amarnath Rambhatla 2, Samantha Schon 3, Ashok Agarwal 4 , Stephen A. Krawetz 5, James M. Dupree 6 and Tomer Avidor-Reiss 1,7,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI 48202, USA; [email protected] 3 Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, L4000 UH-South, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; [email protected] 4 American Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; [email protected] 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Urology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48019, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Urology, College of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43614, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 February 2020; Accepted: 14 April 2020; Published: 16 April 2020 Abstract: Infertility is a devastating experience for both partners as they try to conceive. Historically,when a couple could not conceive, the woman has carried the stigma of infertility; however, men and women are just as likely to contribute to the couple’s infertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Folate, Hormones and Infertility
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 987 Folate, Hormones and Infertility Different factors affecting IVF pregnancy outcome TIINA MURTO ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6206 ISBN 978-91-554-8919-9 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-220476 2014 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Gustavianum, Auditorium Minus, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, Thursday, 22 May 2014 at 09:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Faculty of Medicine). The examination will be conducted in Swedish. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Sven-Eric Olsson (Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Danderyds sjukhus (KI DS)). Abstract Murto, T. 2014. Folate, Hormones and Infertility. Different factors affecting IVF pregnancy outcome. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine 987. 57 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-554-8919-9. Various hormones have been studied as regards prediction of pregnancy outcome after infertility treatment, but no ideal candidate has been found. Folate and genetic variations in folate metabolism have also been associated with infertility, but it remains unclear how these factors affect IVF pregnancy outcome. It is known that infertility is associated with active folic acid supplement use, but the effect of socioeconomic and lifestyle factors on folic acid supplement use in infertile women has not been well investigated. The overall aim of this work was to obtain information on the prediction of live birth, and to study factors affecting the role of folate and folic acid intake in relation to IVF pregnancy outcome. Infertile women with various infertility diagnoses were studied. Healthy, fertile non-pregnant women were used as controls in three of the studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Success of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in Couple with Unexplained Infertility
    J Women’s Health Dev 2020; 3 (2): 077-091 DOI: 10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840019 Research Article Success of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in couple with Unexplained Infertility Nazdar Raouf1*, Roj Hikmat², Aveen Munib³, Maida Shamdeen4, Ramadhan Salahaldeen5, Hameed Abdullah6 ¹Duhok Obstetrics and Gynecology Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan, Iraq ²Senior Registrar, Duhok Obstetrics and Gynecology Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan, Iraq ³Infertility and IVF center, College of Pharmcy, Azadi Teaching Hospital, Duhok, Iraq 4Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Duhok Medical College, Azadi Teaching Hospital, Iraq 5Duhok Medical College, Azadi Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan, Iraq 6Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Hevi Pediatrics Teaching Hospital, Duhok, Iraq *Corresponding Author: Nazdar Raouf, Duhok Obstetrics and Gynecology Teaching Hospital, Kurdistan, Iraq, Tel: + (964) 7504863598; Email: [email protected] Received: 05 April 2020; Accepted: 18 April 2020; Published: 23 April 2020 Citation: Nazdar Raouf, Roj Hikmat, Aveen Munib, Maida Shamdeen, Ramadhan Salahaldeen, Hameed Abdullah. Success of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination in couple with Unexplained Infertility. Journal of Women’s Health and Development 3 (2020): 077-091. Abstract Background: Management of unexplained infertility remains largely empirical, the therapeutic approach should be individualized taking into account patient age and duration of infertility, treatments include expectant observation with timed intercourse
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Efficacy of Letrozole and Gonadotropin Combination Versus Gonadotropin Alone in Intrauterine Insemination Cycl
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE East J Med 25(3):427-433, 2020 DOI: 10.5505/ejm.2020.24993 Comparison of The Efficacy of Letrozole and Gonadotropin Combination Versus Gonadotropin Alone In Intrauterine Insemination Cycles In Patients With Unexplained Infertility Süleyman Cemil Oğlak1*, Mehmet Nafi Sakar2, Serhat Ege1, Serap Mutlu Özçelik Otçu1, Mehmet Obut3, Bekir Kahveci4, İsmail Yıldız5 1Health Sciences University, Diyarbakır Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diyarbakır, Turkey 2Memorial Diyarbakır Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Diyarbakır, Turkey 3Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey 4Çukurova University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Adana, Turkey 5Dicle University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Diyarbakır, Turkey ABSTRACT This study aimed to determine the outcomes of combined treatment of letrozole (LTZ) with recombinant follicle - stimulating hormone (rFSH) in comparison with rFSH alone in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. This study consisted of 86 patients who experienced 106 IUI cycles. Patients were classified into two treatment groups: group I underwent a combination of LTZ plus rFSH, and group II received rFSH alone. Ovulation was triggered with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and IUI performed 36 hours later. The number of follicles ≥18 mm, endometrial thickness, required dose of FSH, duration of ovulation induction (OI), clinical pregnancy rates, multiple pregnancy rates, spontaneous abortion rates, and live birth rates were evaluated. The total required rFSH dose during the OI was significantly lower in the LTZ-rFSH combination group than the rFSH alone group (401.2±177.1 IU and 770.1±345.8 IU, respectively, p<0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects on Follicular Diameter and Endometrial Thickness in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
    European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine ISSN 2515-8260 Volume 07, Issue 07, 2020 Clomiphene Citrate and Anastrozole : Effects on Follicular Diameter and Endometrial Thickness in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Yashinta Sampeliling1, Andi Mardiah Tahir2,Eddy Hartono3, Firdaus Kasim4 1,2,3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Hasanuddin 4Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Hasanuddin, Dr. Wahidin Sudirohusodo General Hospital, Makassar Abstract Objective: To compare the effects of clomiphene citrate and anastrozole on follicular diameter and endometrial thickness in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Methods: This prospective study was conducted at the private-practice setting. The study group consisted of 14 patients who received clomiphene citrate 50 mg and 14 patients received anastrozole 1 mg on day 3 of menstruation for 5 days. Follicular diameter and endometrial thickness were measured with transvaginal ultrasound on day 12 of menstruation. Results: The mean diameter of follicles in the clomiphene citrate group was not significantly differ compared with anastrozole group (13.35±4.72 mm vs 10.92±4.29 mm; p>.05, respectively). A similar effect also observed in endometrial thickness for both study groups (8.51±1.88 mm in anastrozole vs 7.49±2.09 mm in clomiphene citrate; p>.05). Conclusion: Clomiphene citrate and anastrozole were not significantly improved follicular diameter dan endometrial thickness in polycystic ovary syndrome. Keywords : Clomiphene citrate, anastrozole, PCOS 1. INTRODUCTION Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) occurs in 15-20% of reproductive women according to the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). Fifty to seventy percents of PCOS cases are caused by insulin resistance.1 This syndrome is characterized by chronic anovulation with exaggerated biochemical and/or clinical of androgens and without other diseases of the adrenal gland, thyroid or pituitary in similar features.
    [Show full text]
  • Altered Follicular Fluid Metabolic Pattern Correlates with Female Infertility and Outcome Measures of in Vitro Fertilization
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Altered Follicular Fluid Metabolic Pattern Correlates with Female Infertility and Outcome Measures of In Vitro Fertilization Giacomo Lazzarino 1,† , Romina Pallisco 2,†, Gabriele Bilotta 2,†, Ilaria Listorti 2,†, Renata Mangione 3,4, Miriam Wissam Saab 5, Giuseppe Caruso 6 , Angela Maria Amorini 5 , Maria Violetta Brundo 7 , Giuseppe Lazzarino 5,8,* , Barbara Tavazzi 3,4,* and Pasquale Bilotta 9 1 UniCamillus—Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Via di Sant’Alessandro 8, 00131 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 2 Alma Res Fertility Center, Laboratory of Andrology and Embriology, Via Parenzo 12, 00198 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (R.P.); [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (I.L.) 3 Department of Basic Biotechnological Sciences, Intensive and Perioperative Clinics, Catholic University of Rome, Largo F. Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy; [email protected] 4 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy 5 Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Division of Medical Biochemistry, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] (M.W.S.); [email protected] (A.M.A.) 6 Department of Drug and Health Sciences, University of Catania, Viale A. Doria 6, 95125 Catania, Italy; [email protected] 7 Department of Biology, Geology and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Biology, University of Catania, Via Androne 81, 95124 Catania,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Cycle In-Vitro Fertilization in Couples with Unexplained Infertility: Impact of Various Factors on Outcome
    Human Reproduction vol.12 no.ll pp.2402-2407, 1997 Natural cycle in-vitro fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: impact of various factors on outcome F.Zayed1'3, E.A.Lenton1'2 and I.D.Cooke2 The first live birth following IVF occurred in 1978 and was a consequence of IVF performed in the natural cycle 'Sheffield Fertility Centre, 26 Glen Road, Sheffield S7 IRA and 2University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, of a woman with tubal infertility (Edwards et al, 1980). Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/12/11/2402/664697 by guest on 30 September 2021 Jessop Hospital for Women, Sheffield S3 7RE, UK This success encouraged a number of groups to attempt NIVF, but they experienced difficulties (Johnston et al, 3To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jordan University of Science and 1981; Jones et al, 1982). NIVF was quickly abandoned in Technology, P.O. Box 962106, Amman-11196, Jordan favour of stimulated IVF (SIVF), which yielded higher pregnancy rates as a consequence of transferring several This study evaluated outcome in 117 couples with un- embryos (Wood et al, 1985; Testart et al, 1986). However, explained infertility who underwent 162 attempts at recently interest in NIVF has revived because of concerns natural cycle in-vitro fertilization (NIVF) between 1991 surrounding ovarian stimulation. These include ovarian and 1993. An egg was obtained in 138 cycles and a hyperstimulation syndrome, multiple pregnancies (Rizk single embryo was transferred in 89 cycles. There were 16 et al, 1991; Tan et al, 1992), a possible decrease in implantations (four biochemical pregnancies, three clinical endometrial receptivity (Paulson et al, 1990), the emotional abortions and nine live births).
    [Show full text]
  • The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: AUA Best Practice Statement
    The Optimal Evaluation of the Infertile Male: AUA Best Practice Statement Panel Members: AUA Staff: Jonathan Jarow, MD, Chairman Heddy Hubbard, PhD, MPH, FAAN, Mark Sigman, MD, Facilitator Cynthia Janus, MLS, Michael Folmer, Kebe Kadiatu Peter N. Kolettis, MD, Larry R. Lipshultz, MD, Consultant: R. Dale McClure, MD, Joan Hurley, JD, MHS Ajay K. Nangia, MD, Cathy Kim Naughton, MD, Gail S. Prins, PhD, Jay I. Sandlow, MD, Peter N. Schlegel, MD Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ...................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology .................................................................................................................................. 4 Evaluation goals ............................................................................................................................ 6 When to do a full evaluation for infertility ................................................................................. 7 Components of a full evaluation for male infertility .................................................................. 7 Required evaluation components for every patient ..................................................................... 7 Medical history ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 Physical examination -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • CER 217 Management of Infertility Evidence Summary
    Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 217 R Management of Infertility Evidence Summary Background Purpose of Review Condition and Therapeutic Strategies Evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of “Infertility” has traditionally been defined treatments for common causes of infertility. as failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 Key Messages months of regular unprotected intercourse with the same partner (or after 6 months • The ability to compare the effectiveness of for women greater than 35 years of age). treatments would be enhanced by greater However, as many as half of such couples consistency in reporting of outcomes, particularly will conceive without intervention over the live birth rates, as well as reporting of diagnosis- next 12-24 months. Because of this, the term specific outcomes for treatments, such as assisted “subfertility” is preferred by many.1 From a reproductive technology, that are used for population perspective, couples who meet the multiple diagnoses. dichotomous criteria for “infertility” include • Letrozole most likely results in more live births couples who are “normal” but who are in with lower multiple births than clomiphene alone the upper end of the population distribution in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. for “time to pregnancy,” and couples who have a physiological or anatomical cause for • For women with unexplained infertility, there is a prolonged time to pregnancy. However, to most likely shorter time to pregnancy for women be concise, we will use the term “infertility” with immediate in vitro fertilization (IVF) throughout this report. than for those who undergo other treatments prior to IVF. For the outcomes of live birth, Self-reported infertility in the United States, multiple births, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, using the 12-month definition, affected low birthweight, and ovarian hyperstimulation approximately 6 percent of married women syndrome however, there may be no difference aged 15-44 in the 2006-2010 National Survey between the two groups.
    [Show full text]