Liu Xiaobo BT 20 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Liu Xiaobo BT 20 3 Liu Xiaobo 1955- Chinese Writer and Human Rights Activist Winner of the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize BIRTH Liu Xiaobo was born on December 28, 1955, in Changchun, China, a large, industrial city in the northeastern part of the country and the capital of Jilin province. His parents were intellectuals, and his father was employed as a university professor. He has an older brother, Liu Xiaoguang, and a younger brother, Liu Xiaoxuan, who heads the engineering college at the Guangdong University of Technology. YOUTH Little information is available about Liu’s early life. After middle school, he followed his parents to a rural area in Inner Mongolia, an autonomous region in northern China, where they lived from 1969 to 1973 during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution—a social movement initiated by Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong to align the areas of education, art, and literature with communist ideology. As was typical of the educated youth of his generation, he was sent to the countryside at age 19 and spent two years laboring in a people’s commune in his home province of Jilin. Referencing this time in Liu’s life, his close friend Yang Jianli, now in exile, told the Guardian: “Some took it as suffering and thought they should reward themselves when they had power and money later. Liu Xiaobo took it as experience that helped him understand the real suffering of the Chinese people at the hands of the Chinese government.” In 1976 Liu got a job as a construction worker in his hometown of Changchun, the automotive hub of China. EDUCATION When the Communist Party reinstated the national university entrance exam in 1977 in the aftermath of the Cultural Revolution, Liu was admitted to Jilin University to study Chinese literature. While in college, he and six of his schoolmates formed the poetry group The Innocent Hearts, and Liu became interested in Western philosophy. After graduating from Jilin University in 1982, he attended Beijing Normal University, earning a master’s degree in Chinese literature in 1984. He lectured at Beijing Normal while completing his postgraduate studies and received his Ph.D. in Chinese literature in 1988; he was the first student to obtain a doctorate degree in literature under the communist system. CAREER HIGHLIGHTS In 1987 Liu published his first book, the nonfiction bestseller Criticism of the Choice, in which he challenged the ideology of professor Li Zehou, an influential voice in the intellectual community at the time. He also criticized the Chinese tradition of Confucianism, a system of ethical and philosophical principles based on the teachings of the ancient Chinese thinker Confucius. Liu became a professor at Beijing Normal in 1988 and worked as a visiting scholar at the University of Oslo, the University of Hawaii, and Columbia University in New York. His academic career ended abruptly in 1989 when he decided to return home to participate in the prodemocracy demonstrations underway in Beijing. He published The Fog of Metaphysics, a comprehensive survey of Western philosophies, that same year. Tiananmen Square Protests On April 27, 1989, Liu returned to Beijing to take part in the student-led prodemocracy demonstrations in Tiananmen Square, cutting short his lecture series at Columbia to join the movement. The protests began with a student march through the capital city in memory of Hu Yaobang, a recently deceased political leader who favored social and economic reform. Liu rushed home to become an advisor to the student movement. One of few professors to offer direct assistance to the protesters, he provided strategic guidance and gave speeches in support of their cause. The students called for freedom, democracy, and human rights for Chinese citizens, who face limits on many civil liberties, including freedoms of expression, association, and religion. In China, the Communist Party holds a monopoly on political and judicial power. In addition, the government censors telecommunications and media coverage, and police monitor the activities of those suspected of opposing government policy. On June 2, 1989, Liu staged a hunger strike with three other demonstrators to protest the use of military force to evacuate Tiananmen Square. He called for both the students and the government to abandon the ideology of class struggle in favor of a political culture based on dialogue and compromise. In a written statement issued at the start of the hunger strike and translated into English in London’s Independent newspaper, the protesters urged: “We must do this because hatred can only produce violence and dictatorship. We must adopt the spirit of tolerance. We must begin to build up Chinese democracy with a democratic spirit of tolerance and concept of co-operation. Democratic politics is a politics without enemies, without hatred. Instead it means a politics based on mutual respect, mutual tolerance, and mutual compromise, through consultation, discussion, and the electoral process.” Unfortunately, Liu was powerless to prevent bloodshed in Tiananmen Square. On June 4, 1989, following seven weeks of peaceful student protests, the Chinese army killed hundreds—possibly thousands—of demonstrators in an event known as the June 4th Massacre. Liu, however, played a critical role in preventing slaughter on a much larger scale. On the night of June 3rd, before the army forced the protesters out of Tiananmen Square using tanks and guns, Liu disarmed a group of workers who were prepared to fight the troops. Seizing and smashing a rifle during a rally shortly before the military crackdown, he emphasized the importance of peaceful, rather than violent, resistance, arguing: “Whatever extreme the government takes will help it dig its own grave.” He negotiated the nonviolent retreat of several thousand protesters, brokering a deal with the army to allow the last demonstrators to evacuate the square in the final hours of the conflict. Witnessing the government’s violent response to the Tiananmen Square protests was, as Liu put it, a “major turning point in my 50 years on life’s road.” On June 6, 1989, he was arrested for his role in the prodemocracy movement. He was expelled from Beijing Normal University three months later, and his writings were banned. The government issued publications and news reports denouncing him as the “black hand” and “madman” behind the movement. Reflecting back on the government’s actions against him, Liu explained: “Merely for publishing different political views and taking part in a peaceful democracy movement, a teacher lost his lectern, a writer lost his right to publish, and a public intellectual lost the opportunity to give talks publicly.” Liu spent 19 months in detention before being convicted of “counter-revolutionary propaganda and incitement” in January 1991. He avoided a prison sentence on account of his “major meritorious action” in preventing further bloodshed in Tiananmen Square. Human Rights Activism Upon his release, Liu immediately resumed writing, focusing on the topics of human rights and politics. “Freedom of expression is the foundation of human rights, the source of humanity, and the mother of truth. To strangle freedom of speech is to trample on human rights, stifle humanity, and suppress truth,” he explained. Although his works were still banned in China, he published the memoir The Monologues of a Doomsday’s Survivor in Taiwan in 1992. Despite the dangers of being an outspoken critic of the Chinese government, he remained dedicated to the prodemocracy movement. “Living in an authoritarian society, doing the prodemocracy work that I do, the possibility of being sent to prison at any time doesn't actually scare me too much,” he said. “… The way I see it, people like me live in two prisons in China. You come out of the small, fenced-in prison, only to enter the bigger, fence-less prison of society.” In May 1995 he was taken into custody for petitioning the government to initiate political reforms and reassess its response to the Tiananmen Square protests. Authorities held him under residential surveillance before arresting him in October 1996 for questioning the merits of China’s single-party political system, criticizing China’s policy toward Taiwan, and calling for a dialogue between the Chinese government and the Dalai Lama of Tibet. He was sentenced to three years in a reeducation-through-labor camp for “disturbing public order” through his statements. Liu was released in 1999. At the turn of the millennium, he continued writing articles on political reform in his country and published compilations of political criticism and poetry in Taiwan and Hong Kong. He also petitioned for freedom of expression and the release of prisoners. In addition, he sought compensation for the families of victims of the June 4th Massacre through his work with the Tiananmen Mothers, a support group formed by parents of students killed in the 1989 protests. In 2001 he established an Internet connection in his home, using this tool to distribute his writings. “The Internet is God’s present to China,” he said. “It is the best tool for the Chinese people … to cast off slavery and strive for freedom.” In 2004, however, authorities cut his phone line and Internet connection when he released an essay criticizing the government’s use of “subversion” charges to silence authors and activists. He was detained overnight and thereafter subjected to regular police surveillance, signaling a government crackdown on outspoken intellectuals. From 2003 to 2007 Liu served as president of the Independent Chinese PEN Center, an association of independent writers. The organization’s mission is to defend freedom of expression, which in other countries is a basic civil right. It provides assistance to those writers who are threatened, harassed, and convicted of crimes on account of their words. PEN is a worldwide association affiliated with the United Nations that advocates on behalf of authors persecuted for their opinions.
Recommended publications
  • People in Need Annual Report 2008
    PEOPLE IN NEED ANNUAL REPORT 2008 PIN_2008-EN_v1.indd 1 9/15/09 1:36:58 PM TABLE OF CONTENTS A Word from the Director 3 PIN Administered Webpages 4 List of Abbreviations 4 Areas of Activity 1992–2009 5 Relief and Development Department 6 Democratic Republic of Congo 7 Afghanistan 8 Burma 10 Cambodia 11 Sri Lanka 12 Pakistan 13 Angola 14 Ethiopia 15 Namibia 16 Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon 17 Georgia, Armenia, Chechnya 18 Ukraine, Romania 19 Development Awareness 20 Human Rights and Democracy Department 21 Cuba 22 Burma 23 Belarus 24 Moldova, Ukraine 25 One World Human Rights Film Festival 26 One World in Schools 28 Social Integration Programmes 29 Social Integration Programmes – Slovakia 33 Variants 34 Information and Media Projects 35 Club of Friends 36 Real Aid Public Collection 37 People in Need Staff 38 Financial Report 41 Q Photo: © Jan Faltus, Ethiopia 2006 / In November 2008 PIN opened a new primary school in the Lower Lenda District. PIN_2008-EN_v1.indd 2 9/15/09 1:37:01 PM DEAR FRIENDS, You have in your hands the report on the sixteenth year to support democracy and basic human rights in countries of People in Need. The objective of this report is to render where they are only a dream today. our accounts to the public, contributors, and all those who 2008 was also a year of challenge. The global fi nancial make our work possible, not to portray PIN in a fl attering crisis, the worsening of international relations and the light. Evaluating our work is up to you.
    [Show full text]
  • China Jails Dissident Liu Xiaobo for 11 Years
    China jails dissident Liu Xiaobo for 11 years Fri, Dec 25 2009 By Chris Buckley BEIJING (Reuters) - China's most prominent dissident, Liu Xiaobo, was jailed on Friday for 11 years for campaigning for political freedoms, with the stiff sentence on a subversion charge swiftly condemned by rights groups and Washington. Liu, who turns 54 on Monday, helped organize the "Charter 08" petition which called for sweeping political reforms, and before that was prominent in the 1989 pro-democracy protests centered on Tiananmen Square that were crushed by armed troops. He stood quietly in a Beijing courtroom as a judge found him guilty of "inciting subversion of state power" for his role in the petition and for online essays critical of the ruling Communist Party, defense lawyer Shang Baojun said. Liu was not allowed to respond in court to the sentence. "Xiaobo and I were very calm when the verdict was read. We were mentally prepared for it that he would get a long sentence," said Liu's wife, Liu Xia, who was allowed in to hear the verdict. She was barred from the trial on Wednesday. "Later we were allowed 10 minutes together, and he told me he would appeal, even if the chances of success are low," she said. Liu has been among the most combative critics of China's one-Party rule. His case attracted an outcry from Western government and rights activists at home and abroad. The unusually harsh sentence drew a fresh outcry that is likely to grow. China "sees Liu Xiaobo as a representative figure, and think they can scare the others into silence with such a harsh sentence," said dissident writer and Christian activist Yu Jie.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanising Disaster Risk
    Ben Flower and Matt Fortnam URBANISING DISASTER RISK PEOPLE IN NEED IN PEOPLE VULNERABILITY OF THE URBAN POOR IN CAMBODIA TO FLOODING AND OTHER HAZARDS Copyright © People in Need 2015. Reproduction is permitted providing the source is visibly credited. This report has been published by People in Need mission in Cambodia and is part of “Building Disaster Ressilient Communities in Cambodia II“- project funded by Disaster Preparedness Program of Eureopan Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (DIPECHO). The project is implemented by a consortium of five international organisations: ActionAid, DanChurchAid/ Christian Aid, Oxfam, People in Need and Save the Children. Disclaimer This document covers humanitarian aid activities implemented with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein should not be taken, in any way, to reflect the official opinion of the European Union, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. Acknowledgment People in Need would like to thank all the organisations and individuals which provided Piotr Sasin support and input throughout the research of this report. In particular we want to Country Director thank: National Committee for Disaster Management, Municipality of Phnom Penh, People in Need Municipality of Kampong Cham, Japan International Coopeation Agency, Mekong River Cambodia Commission, Urban Poor Women Development, Community Development Fund and June 2015 Sahmakum Teang Tnaut. Our special thanks go to urban
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Wall at Sea: China's Navy in the Twenty-First Century
    Christopher R. Hughes Book review: the Great Wall at sea: China’s Navy in the twenty-first century; China, the United States, and twenty-first-century sea power: defining a maritime security; China’s new diplomacy: rationale, strategies and significance partnership Article (Published version) (Refereed) Original citation: Hughes, Christopher R. (2010) Book review: the Great Wall at sea: China’s Navy in the twenty- first century; China, the United States, and twenty-first-century sea power: defining a maritime security; China’s new diplomacy: rationale, strategies and significance partnership. China review international, 17 (4). pp. 424-430. ISSN 1069-5834 © 2010 University of Hawaii Press This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/45737/ Available in LSE Research Online: September 2012 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. 424 China Review International: Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010 join me in campaigning against this technological abortion. So far I am a lonely voice. Diana Lary Diana Lary is the author of The Chinese People at War (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010) and Chinese Migrations: The Movement of People, Goods, and Ideas over Four Millennia ( forthcoming).
    [Show full text]
  • The European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid: an Ngo Perspective
    VOICE STUDY - MAY 2014 THE EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON HUMANITARIAN AID: AN NGO PERSPECTIVE VOICE Voluntary Organisations in Cooperation in Emergencies 43, Avenue Louise, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 (0)2 - 541.13.60 Fax: +32 (0)2 - 534.99.53 www.ngovoice.org E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ngovoice.org AUSTRIA BELGIUM CZECH REPUBLIC FRANCE FINLAND DENMARK GREECE UNITED KINGDOM GERMANY IRELAND PORTUGAL C : 100 M : 60 J : 0 N : 0 Médecins du monde - Identité visuelle PORTUGAL 08/07/2009 SPAIN SWITZERLAND SWEDEN THE NETHERLANDS LUXEMBOURG ITALY NORWAY VOICE STUDY - MAY 2014 THE EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON HUMANITARIAN AID: AN NGO PERSPECTIVE This report was researched and written by: Full bibliography and annexes can be found on the VOICE website. Commissioned and edited by: VOICE Graphic Design and Layout by: Marina Colleoni Copyright: VOICE, May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................... page 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................... page 7 Main findings ...................................................................................................................... page 7 Key recommendations ....................................................................................................... page 10 INTRODUCTION ................... page 11 METHODOLOGY ................... page 13 1. APPLYING THE EUROPEAN CONSENSUS ON HUMANITARIAN AID ................... page 14 1.1 Awareness of the Consensus ....................................................................................... page 15 1.2 Reflection of the
    [Show full text]
  • THE POWER of the POWERLESS in CHINA Panel Discussion
    THE POWER OF THE POWERLESS IN CHINA Panel Discussion Wednesday, September 26, 5 p.m. Since 2016, The Vaclav Havel Library Foundation recognizes writers who share Havel’s passionate commitment to human rights and have suffered unjust persecution for their beliefs. The award for a Courageous Writer at Risk is given each year to a writer of a distinguished work of fiction, literary nonfiction, biography/memoir, drama, or poetry, who is courageous in dissent and has been punished for challenging an oppressive regime. The winner of the 2018 Disturbing the Peace, Award for a Courageous Writer at Risk is Chinese author, reporter, musician and poet – Liao Yiwu (aka Lao Wei). As a vocal critic of China’s Communist regime, he spent four years in prison after publicly reciting his poem “Massacre” in memory of the victims of the Tiananmen Square military on June 4, 1989. He currently lives in Germany, under asylum but will be attending the award ceremony at The Bohemian National Hall in New York on September 27, 2018. In his books The Corpse Walker and God is Red, Liao Yiwu recounts the stunning life stories of ordinary men and women who live at the margins of Chinese society – Christian believers as well as oddballs and outcasts who have been battered by life and state repression yet who have managed to retain their irrepressible personality, invincible spirit, and innate human dignity. These stories raise the inevitable question that Vaclav Havel persistently posed as an underground playwright: Can a totalitarian state prevail against the human spirit it tries so hard to stifle? Liao Yiwu will be joined in this discussion by Liu Xia, an artist herself and the widow of Nobel Laureate and Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo; and by Professor Andrew Nathan, a leading China specialist and human rights advocate.
    [Show full text]
  • REMEMBERING LIU XIAOBO Analyzing Censorship of the Death of Liu Xiaobo on Wechat and Weibo
    REMEMBERING LIU XIAOBO Analyzing censorship of the death of Liu Xiaobo on WeChat and Weibo By Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Jeffrey Knockel, Blake Miller, Jason Q. Ng, Lotus Ruan, Lokman Tsui, and Ruohan Xiong JULY 16, 2017 RESEARCH REPORT #97 Copyright © The Citizen Lab Licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 (Attribution-ShareAlike licence). Electronic version first published in 2017 by the Citizen Lab. This work can be accessed through https://citizenlab.ca/2017/07/analyzing- censorship-of-the-death-of-liu-xiaobo-on-wechat-and-weibo/. Document Version: 1.0 The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license under which this report is licensed lets you freely copy, distribute, remix, transform, and build on it, as long as you: • give appropriate credit; • indicate whether you made changes; and • use and link to the same CC BY-SA 4.0 licence. However, any rights in excerpts reproduced in this report remain with their respective authors; and any rights in brand and product names and associated logos remain with their respective owners. Uses of these that are protected by copyright or trademark rights require the rightsholder’s prior written agreement. Suggested Citation Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Jeffrey Knockel, Blake Miller, Jason Q. Ng, Lotus Ruan, Lokman Tsui, and Ruohan Xiong. “Remembering Liu Xiaobo: Analyzing censorship of the death of Liu Xiaobo on WeChat and Weibo,” Citizen Lab Research Report No. 97, University of Toronto, July 2017. Acknowledgements Authors are listed in alphabetical order: Masashi Crete-Nishihata, Jeffrey Knockel, Blake Miller, Jason Q. Ng, Lotus Ruan, Lokman Tsui, and Ruohan Xiong. Special thanks to Ron Deibert for review and supervision.
    [Show full text]
  • Media As Challenger of State Genocide
    University of Business and Technology in Kosovo UBT Knowledge Center UBT International Conference 2020 UBT International Conference Oct 31st, 1:30 PM - 3:00 PM Media as challenger of state genocide Safet Zejnullahu University for Business and Technology, [email protected] Velibor Covic [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference Recommended Citation Zejnullahu, Safet and Covic, Velibor, "Media as challenger of state genocide" (2020). UBT International Conference. 155. https://knowledgecenter.ubt-uni.net/conference/2020/all_events/155 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Publication and Journals at UBT Knowledge Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in UBT International Conference by an authorized administrator of UBT Knowledge Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Media as a challenger of state genocide Safet Zejnullahu UBT – Institution of Higher Education, Kalabria, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo [email protected] Abstract. The media and state leadership have a strong and inseparable link in the history of the media. In totalitarian regimes, the government finances and controls the media, in regimes with apartheid elements the government closes the media that does not like, persecutes and kills journalists. In democratic societies, state leadership and the media have a financial connection in most of the cases. This paper will address a very specific media situation, that of Montenegro in 1999. Montenegro was part of the former Yugoslavia, which was committing genocide against Kosovo Albanians. But the main media in Montenegro, starting with the public broadcaster, the radio as part of it, and the main newspapers, marked a rare case when the media does not obey the government but takes the side of people in need - Kosovar refugees who, fleeing extermination, sought refuge in Montenegro.
    [Show full text]
  • Rising Soft Powers: China Contents
    Rising Soft Powers CHINA 1 All of the articles in this work originally appeared on the CPD website. All of the photographs in this work, unless noted otherwise, are by César Corona. USC Center on Public Diplomacy 3502 Watt Way, Suites 232-234 Los Angeles, CA 90089 P: 213.821.2078 F: 213.821.0774 E: [email protected] Visit uscpublicdiplomacy.org © 2016 Rising Soft Powers: China Contents Director’s Dispatches The U.S.-China Relationship 1 Public Diplomacy in U.S.-China Relations 2 China’s First Lady 3 Mr. Xi Comes to America’s Heartland 5 Advertising China 6 Features Authenticating the Nation: Confucius Institutes and Soft Power 9 Media Diplomacy and U.S.-China Military-to-Military Cooperation 15 Q&A with CPD Zhao Qizheng 31 Xu Lin 34 Essays Networks and Partnerships within U.S.-China Public Diplomacy 37 China’s Panda Diplomacy 40 Why Hollywood Makes a Stronger Case for China 43 Spotlight Not Lost in Translation: Why Is Jon Stewart Popular in China? 47 Rising Soft Powers: China Photo Gallery: Expo Shanghai 2010 Viewpoints The First Soft-Power Superpower 56 A Cautionary Tale of Soft Power Promotion 58 When the “Sleeping Dragon” Dreams 60 Religion, Nation Branding and the Soft Power Showdown in China 62 Urbanizing China-EU Relations? 65 China and India: Translating Public Diplomacy into Soft Power 66 Exporting Chinese “Culture” 68 Beijing Film Festival: Technically Dazzling, Ultimately Disappointing 70 Items & Ideas MPD in China 2013: The Four Schools of Chinese PD 72 Rising Soft Powers: China 4 Director’s Dispatches Jian (Jay) Wang, director of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy and associate professor at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, is the author of the following articles about Chinese public diplomacy and soft power.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011 Web2
    1 2011 Annual Report of the COMMITTEE OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS During 2010, the Committee of Concerned Scientists continued to advocate on behalf of scientists, academics, and their organizations. We wrote in concern for over 35 individuals or organizations, located in 15 countries. We generally addressed our letters to the heads of state, as well as to the ministries or local authorities with jurisdiction over the case when we were able to identify them. We contacted the ambassador of the country involved, as well as the US embassy or the US State Department where we could hope for their assistance. The following summaries will give you an idea of the grave risks our colleagues are running in exercising their human rights, as well as of the rare victories we achieved on their behalf. Even as we write, some of the countries involved in our efforts are reverberating with unprecedented demands by their own populations for greater respect for their human rights. BAHRAIN Professor Abdul Jalil Al-Sigace, who taught mechanical engineering at the University of Bahrain, was arrested upon his return from the United Kingdom, where he had addressed the House of Lords concerning human rights in Bahrain. Al-Sigace also directed the Human Rights Bureau of the Haq Movement for Civil Liberties and Democracy, an opposition Bahraini political movement. We wrote to protest his arrest at the airport on August 13, 2010 and detention without charges, as well as his inability to get medical treatment. Dr. Al-Singace suffers from polomyelitis. According to Amnesty International, he was eventually charged with sedition and he faces the death penalty for expressing his views, in violation of Article 19 of the UN International Convention on civil and political rights, to which Bahrain is a party.
    [Show full text]
  • China Media Bulletin
    CHINA MEDIA BULLETIN A biweekly update of press freedom and censorship news related to the People’s Republic of China Issue 97: December 4, 2013 Headlines Fired CCTV producer denounces station’s practices Despite reported self-censorship, Bloomberg stays in Beijing’s doghouse Censors limit coverage of Qingdao pipeline blast Netizens wary of plans for new national security committee Zimbabwe’s ruling party sends team to China for media cooperation PHOTO OF THE WEEK: FOUR-LETTER WORDS BROADCAST / PRINT MEDIA NEWS Fired CCTV producer denounces station’s practices Wang Qinglei, a producer who had been with state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV) for 10 years, was forced to resign on November 27 after he questioned the station’s journalistic ethics. In a December 1 microblog posting, Wang confirmed his departure and criticized CCTV for aiding the government’s aggressive campaign to rein in influential bloggers, including Chinese- American businessman Charles Xue, whose jailhouse “confession” was aired by the station in September (see CMB No. 93). Wang said the broadcaster essentially served as an accomplice by helping the authorities punish individuals without legal basis. “The news media is not a court,” he wrote. He also lashed out at CCTV for running “embarrassing” and unprofessional reports against the U.S.-based coffee retailer Starbucks (see CMB No. 95), among other topics. Wang said his views were shared by many of his colleagues at the station, but managers used actions like his firing to keep them in line. Wang’s open letter was shared 30,000 times within hours before it was removed by the microblogging platform Sina Weibo.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Context Following the Events in the Middle East
    CHINA OBSERVATORY FOR thE PROTEctiON OF humAN Rights DEFENDERS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 In China, human rights activities and fundamental freedoms remained severely restricted throughout 2010 and 2011. In addition, the Chinese authorities increased their repression against any form of dissent in response to anonymous online calls for a “Jasmine Revolution” that started in February 2011 following the events in the Middle East and North Africa. In that context, human rights defenders, including the signatories of “Charter 08”, human rights lawyers as well as defenders working on HIV/AIDS, who denounced forced evictions, corruption and who questioned the Government’s role in various scandals, continued to be subjected to various acts of harassment and intimidation, including arbitrary detention and enforced disappear- ance. The authorities also continued to crackdown on defenders and restrict freedoms of expression, assembly and association on the eve of key sensitive anniversaries and events, such as the Shanghai World Expo 2010. IA S Political context A Following the events in the Middle East and North Africa in early 2011, Chinese authorities became increasingly concerned that the revolutions may have a spill-over effect in China as well. Their reactions especially intensified after an anonymous call online on February 19, 2011, urging people to start a “Jasmine Revolution-style uprising”, similar to those in Tunisia and Egypt. The online post urges protestors to chant slogans on February 20, 2011, in several cities across China. Although faced with a massive response from the police, another online post called on people to march peacefully on February 27 to certain central or symbolic places.
    [Show full text]