Patented Electric Guitar Pickups and the Creation of Modern Music Genres Sean M
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 2016 Patented Electric Guitar Pickups and the Creation of Modern Music Genres Sean M. O'Connor University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Sean M. O'Connor, Patented Electric Guitar Pickups and the Creation of Modern Music Genres, 23 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1007 (2016), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/195 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2016] 1007 PATENTED ELECTRIC GUITAR PICKUPS AND THE CREATION OF MODERN MUSIC GENRES Sean M. O’Connor* INTRODUCTION The electric guitar is iconic for rock and roll music. And yet, it also played a defining role in the development of many other twentieth-century musical genres. Jump bands, electric blues and country, rockabilly, pop, and, later, soul, funk, rhythm and blues (“R&B”), and fusion, all were cen- tered in many ways around the distinctive, constantly evolving sound of the electric guitar. Add in the electric bass, which operated with an amplifica- tion model similar to that of the electric guitar, and these two new instru- ments created the tonal and stylistic backbone of the vast majority of twen- tieth-century popular music.1 At the heart of why the electric guitar sounds so different from an acoustic guitar (even when amplified by a microphone) is the “pickup”: a curious bit of very early twentieth-century electromagnetic technology.2 Rather than relying on mechanical vibrations in a wire coil to create an analogous (“analog”) electrical energy wave as employed by the micro- phone, “pickups” used nonmechanical “induction” of fluctuating current in a wire coil resulting from the vibration of a metallic object in the coil’s magnetized field.3 This faint, induced electrical signal could then be sent to an amplifier that would turn it into a much more powerful signal: one that could, for example, drive a loudspeaker. For readers unfamiliar with elec- tromagnetic principles, these concepts will be explained further in Part I below. * Boeing International Professor and Chair, Center for Advanced Studies and Research on Inno- vation Policy (CASRIP), University of Washington School of Law (Seattle); Senior Scholar, Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property (CPIP), George Mason University School of Law. The Author would like to thank: Adam Mossoff, Mark Schultz, and Matt Barblan at CPIP for inspiration and helpful suggestions about this Essay and its companion video presentation; Jason Parfet for his excellent re- search assistance on the history of electric guitar pickup patents; Devlin Hartline and Matt Barblan for providing guitars and amps for the presentation at George Mason Law; and Rod Harrell, Matt Tully, and other staff at the George Mason Law Review for edits, comments, and publication. All errors are the Author’s own. 1 See, e.g., THE WRECKING CREW! (Magnolia Pictures 2015). 2 Invention of the Electric Guitar, LEMELSON CTR. SMITHSONIAN NAT’L MUSEUM AM. HIST., http://invention.si.edu/invention-electric-guitar/p/35-invention (last visited May 28, 2016). 3 Kurt Prange, How Guitar Pickups Work, GUITAR PLANET MAG. (Sept.1, 2011), http://www. guitarplanet.eu/how-guitar-pickups-work.html. 1008 GEO. MASON L. REV. [VOL. 23:4 Amplifiers of the early twentieth century were exclusively vacuum- tube circuits because the transistor—and hence “solid state” circuits—had not yet been invented.4 Tube amplifiers have many virtues as “warm” and “natural” sounding systems, but they also have serious drawbacks.5 Most notably, they often “clip” the signal—that is, cut off some of the amplitude peaks—resulting in a distorted sound even at fairly low volumes.6 As tubes are “overdriven” when pushed too hard in a circuit, they also add extra harmonics to musical tones.7 This played a role in what often sounds like the “honky” and fuzzy tone of early recordings from the 1920s and ‘30s.8 Combined, the electric guitar pickup and tube amplification generated what was originally viewed as a flawed and even unpleasant tone for some, until it became the signature sound of musicians pushing the boundaries of existing musical genres. But as much as the pickup was a solution to a problem posed by a small niche of musicians, it was equally an off-shoot of the explosion in sound-amplification inventive activity unleashed by Alex- ander Graham Bell’s and others’ pioneering work in harnessing “galvanic” forces to transmit sound. Thus, the “transducer”—a thin flexible diaphragm attached to a wire coil within a magnetic field that vibrated in response to sound waves striking the diaphragm to induce a faint electric signal—soon became but one way of transforming acoustic sound waves into electrical ones.9 The pickup was one of these experimental methods and hardly the most successful at its outset. This made it more of a technician’s solution in search of a problem. The volume limitations of the otherwise popular acoustic guitar, together with the relative ineffectiveness of early micro- phones to amplify it, made the guitar a perfect candidate for this fringe “electromagnetic pickup” approach.10 Once the unconventional tonal palette of an “electric guitar” (as well as other electric stringed instruments) became accepted in some quarters of the music world, a major invention race took off—first amongst upstart, electric instrument music companies and then soon involving major, estab- lished instrument manufacturers such as Gibson. While this race involved fascinating series of inventions in instrument bodies, strings, amplifiers, electric instrument cables, and ultimately “pedal” or “outboard” signal pro- cessing devices such as wah-wah pedals, distortion boxes, and time shifting 4 Michael Riordan et al., The Invention of the Transistor, 71 REV. MOD. PHYSICS 336 (1999) (noting that the invention of the “point-contact” transistor—the first transistor—occurred in 1947). 5 Eric Barbour, The Cool Sound of Tubes, IEEE SPECTRUM (Jan. 4, 1999), http://spectrum. ieee.org/consumer-electronics/audiovideo/the-cool-sound-of-tubes. 6 Id. 7 Id. 8 Microphones of the time were run through tube pre-amplifiers to provide enough signal to drive acetate and later tape recording devices. 9 TEEMU KYTTÄLÄ, SOLID-STATE GUITAR AMPLIFIERS 242 (2008), http://www.jeanpierrepoulin. com/PDF/transistor.pdf. 10 Invention of the Electric Guitar, supra note 2. 2016] PATENTED ELECTRIC GUITAR PICKUPS 1009 circuits (reverb, delay, flange, and chorus), the patent competition for new and improved pickups was at the heart of the electric guitar revolution. With significant revenues at stake as the new electric music genres explod- ed, the patent system provided the basis upon which inventors, manufactur- ers, and investors could commit significant resources to intense, and often quite high tech, research and development (“R&D”). But equally important to the R&D race was the fact that these new devices required professional manufacturers to put them into scaled-up commercial production as only a very few musicians could—or would—hand wire their own pickups, build their own amps or guitars, etc. While not rocket science, by today’s stand- ards the new electric instruments and amplification were very much futuris- tic technology of the time, advancing along the leading edge of electrical engineering. This Essay provides an overview of how patents thus played a core role in developing world-changing musical genres. This may be surprising, as normally copyright law is associated with incentivizing advances in the creative arts.11 But as this Conference’s theme and presentations emphasize, the whole range of intellectual property (“IP”), especially when viewed as a platform, supports innovation across the spectrum of human ingenuity and creativity.12 This Essay is also intended to be read in conjunction with a viewing of the live-music demonstration of how pickups transformed popu- lar music, delivered at the Conference and available at the Center for Pro- tection of Intellectual Property’s YouTube channel.13 Part I of this Essay explores how the electric guitar pickup emerged out of the turn-of-the-century invention gold rush in sound amplification and reproduction by electromagnetic means. Part II then explains how limi- tations of this new technology, combined with limits of the tube amplifica- tion of the time, created the unusual tonal aspects of the electric guitar. It also considers how patents were crucial to creating incentives for profes- sional manufacturers to enter into commercial production of sophisticated gear that most guitar players could not—or would rather not—build at home for themselves. Part III argues that this new sonic palette inspired not only rock and rollers, but also a wide range of musicians and artists to mod- ify existing genres of music, as well as to create entirely new ones. In this way, the “bugs” or limitations of this new sonic technology turned into 11 Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Foreseeability and Copyright Incentives, 122 HARV. L. REV. 1569, 1572 (2009). 12 Content from this Fall 2015 Conference—produced by the Center for the Protection of Intellec- tual Property (CPIP) at the George Mason University School of Law—is available at The IP Platform: Supporting Invention & Inspiration, CTR. PROTECTION INTELL. PROP., http://cpip.gmu.edu/conferences/ 2015-fall-conference/ (last visited May 28, 2016). 13 CPIP 2015 Fall Conference – Clip 6: Prof. Sean O’Connor, YOUTUBE (Apr. 12, 2016), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m7LKQPCHS0&feature=youtu.be [hereinafter Guitar Demonstra- tion].